0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
79 Ansichten2 Seiten
In the u.s., at least for the last few decades, the legal certificate is sufficient for a couple to be considered married. In some jurisdictions, no ceremony as such is required, Just signatures on a piece of paper. Without a certificate of marriage, the state maintains that there is no marriage.
In the u.s., at least for the last few decades, the legal certificate is sufficient for a couple to be considered married. In some jurisdictions, no ceremony as such is required, Just signatures on a piece of paper. Without a certificate of marriage, the state maintains that there is no marriage.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOCX, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
In the u.s., at least for the last few decades, the legal certificate is sufficient for a couple to be considered married. In some jurisdictions, no ceremony as such is required, Just signatures on a piece of paper. Without a certificate of marriage, the state maintains that there is no marriage.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOCX, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Legally speaking, a jurisdiction may recognize such a union by issuing a certificate, often called a 'marriage license'. By giving legal recognition to the marriage, the state confers certain rights and obligations onto the couple. There are also laws relating to their offspring. In the United States, at least for the last few decades, the legal certificate is sufficient for a couple to be considered married. In some American jurisdictions, no ceremony as such is required. Just signatures on a piece of paper. If a couple were to hold hands in the park, and say, "We marry each other." the state would not be amused. It would not recognize the validity of the alleged marriage. Why? Because as the cliché goes, no job is finished until the paperwork is done. Without a certificate of marriage, the state maintains that there is no marriage. (If the couple live together long enough in some jurisdictions, theirs may be considered a 'common law' marriage, but that's another story.) Maybe centuries ago, this legal requirement was less strict or non-existent. But these are modern times, and that's how the law is these days. Now, let us consider the religious aspect. After becoming married in a religious ceremony, according to the dictates of their religion, a couple is considered to be 'married', as far as other members of their religion are concerned. If there is another denomination of their religion, or an entirely different religion that accepts their marriage, all well and good: other churches will accept their marriage, too. Still, in nearly all cases, the church will insist that the couple take care of the legal requirements of the jurisdiction in which they reside. Often, the pastor, priest, rabbi or minister who conducts the religious ceremony is also authorized to sign the legal paperwork. In my own case, Jane and I were married (civil sense) by Esteban Galvan, pastor of the Bronx UC, who obtained authority from the government to sign the marriage certificate. The Reverend Sun Myung Moon does not sign marriage licenses. Not only would this be impracticably arduous in the case of a mass marriage of 1,000 or more couples, but it is not possible for him to be authorized by the multitude of legal jurisdictions throughout the world. So after getting married in the Blessing ceremony, the couple must get married in the civil sense as well. This can often take a long time, especially if the couple are citizens of different countries or have overseas missions. Not speaking the same language can be a problem, too! Still, like all other couples, Blessed couples celebrate their wedding anniversary according to the date of their Blessing -- not the date of their civil ceremony. Conflicts between the two aspects of marriage A couple can get married (in the civil, legal sense) by signing a marriage certificate with the proper endorsements. This, however, might not be recognized by their church. Some religions do not recognize the validity of marriage with non-believers or with adherents of another, conflicting faith. A couple can get married (in the religious sense) but still not be considered 'married' by the state. In many international marriages, this can be a big problem, particularly when a wife from a poor country immigrates to the United States to be with husband. It can take years to straighten out the legal issues, if Immigration disputes the marriage's validity. This was rather a common problem for UC members in the 1970s and 1980s, when typically after being Blessed a couple would then remain separated for 3 years or more before settling down. Conclusion In this essay, I have presented the idea that there are two aspects to marriage: religious and civil. Both religions and governments insist that their respective aspects be fulfilled properly to recognize the validity of a marriage. Indeed, in nearly all cases, a couple will fulfill the requirements of both their religion and their government, by participating in a religious wedding and by completing the proper legal documents.