Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I.
1965: The Elementary and Secondary Act 1972: Health and Rehabilitation Act (PL 93-112) 1975: The Education for all Handicapped children Act of 1975 (PL 94-142) 1986: The Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments (PL 99-457)
(1)
(2)
(3)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2801456 Expanded the scope of 94-142 to include early intervention and early childhood education. Services for students with disabilities were expanded to include ages 3-21.
B.
C.
D.
E.
The Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Education Act (Three Primary Components)
(a)
(b)
(c) the research of effective methods of testing, identication, and programming, which is performed at the National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented; the awarding of grants to colleges, states, and districts that focus on underrepresented populations of gifted students; grants awarded to state and districts for program implementation.
F.
1990:
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (PL 101-476)
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
G.
H.
I.
1990: Public Law 94-142 becomes the Inidividuals with Disabilities Education Act. 1990: Americans with Disabilities Act (PL 101-336) 1997:
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments (IDEA) (PL 105-14)
EDUCATION LEGISLATION & LITIGATION RELATING TO STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS IN THE UNITED STATES 1965 - 2008
J.
K.
L.
2004: Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 P.L. 108-446 2006: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendment (Part B for school aged children)
(1)
(2)
The nal regulations were published on Aug. 14, 2006. IDEA Regulations
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
Identify the members of the IEP Team. Identify instances when an IEP Team member may not need to attend. Provide for inviting representatives from the Part C system. Require that the notice inform parents of other IEP Team participants. Revise requirements for when transition content must be included in an IEP meeting notice. Set forth provisions regarding consideration of Individualized Family Services Plans (IFSPs) for children aged three through ve. Require that the IEP be accessible to teachers and others responsible for its implementation. Address the IEP for a student who transfers to a different school district in the state. Address transmittal of records for students who transfer. Add a new provision for amending the IEP without another meeting. Encourage consolidation of IEP meetings. Provide for the review and, as appropriate, revision of the IEP.
(m)
(n)
EDUCATION LEGISLATION & LITIGATION RELATING TO STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS IN THE UNITED STATES 1965 - 2008
M.
N.
(d)
http://www.wrightslaw.com/info/sec504.adaaa.htm
(e)
It is important for music educators to be aware of these and future legislative changes
because more students will be eligible for Section 504 Plans as a result of the ADA
Amendments. (2)
How can the LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT be applied in the music classroom? 2011: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendment (Part C for Babies & Toddlers) http://nichcy.org/laws/idea
II.
Current Structure of Special Education in our schools
`
A.
B.
C.
INFLUENCED BY (1)
The Civil Rights Movement (2)
Parents and Advocates of students with special needs PROVIDES (1)
VISION that all students (those with and without special needs) have the opportunity to learn
and grow within the whole of society regardless of differences and diversity (2) The Widened Lens of Inclusion INEQUITIES STILL EXIST (1)
Racial segregation is now a social "taboo" (2)
Children with Autism or Down Syndrome often must be transported great distances away from
their neighborhood schools
III.
The Broad Scope of SPECIAL NEEDS
A.
B.
MENTALLY & PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED GIFTED AND TALENTED
EDUCATION LEGISLATION & LITIGATION RELATING TO STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS IN THE UNITED STATES 1965 - 2008
IV.
Texas Education Agency
A.
B.
TEKS Guidelines (MUSIC) (1)
Elementary (2)
MIddle (3)
High School Integration of IEP Goals with the mandatory TEKS Goals established by the TEA
V.
Litigation
A.
B.
1896: Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in the jurisprudence of the United States, upholding the constitutionality of state laws requiring racial segregation in public facilities under the doctrine of "separate but equal." 1954:
Brown vs. Board of Education