Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Product Re-Launch Excellence: Transforming Lackluster Pharmaceutical Products Into Market Success Stories
Study Overview
Best Practices, LLC conducted this benchmarking study to assist brand teams in understanding winning strategies and tactics for relaunching products in the U.S. and global marketplace.
Study Objective
This study seeks to benchmark the winning strategies, field-proven tactics and experiencebased pitfalls of pharmaceutical companies that have re-launched or repositioned a brand.
Re-Defining Product Character Investment Levels Strategy & Structure Marketing Mix Optimization Sales Force Management Product Leadership
BEST PRACTICES,
LLC
Benchmark Brands
Across 19 companies, this study covers such brands as:
Benchmarked Brands
BEST PRACTICES,
LLC
Universe of Learning
Best Practices, LLC distilled observations and insights from in-depth interviews, survey data and published reports on a total of 19 brand leaders within 14 leading pharmaceutical and biotech companies.
Benchmarked Companies
Abbott Laboratories AstraZeneca Aventis Bayer Biologics Baxter Healthcare DSM Pharmaceuticals Eli Lilly GlaxoSmithKline Merck Novartis Pfizer Roche Schering AG UCB Pharma
Copyright Best Practices, LLC
BEST PRACTICES,
LLC
BEST PRACTICES,
LLC
To bolster the studys key findings two successful drug re-launch case studies - Zithromax and Wellbutrin provide valuable real world insights:
Wellbutrin Sales GlaxoWellcome merger enlarges sales force Patent expires. No immediate generic release 1992 1993 1998 1994 1995 1996 1997 1999 2000 2001 Wellbutrin SR Launched Zyban Launched Wellbutrin XL Launched
1991
1990
BEST PRACTICES,
2002
2003
LLC
Why Re-Launch?
There is no single reason why companies re-launch. Rather, it is a combination of factors. Poor execution, brand identity and off-target product positioning trigger the majority of all product re-launches.
What were the rationales for the re-launch of the brand(s)?
Poor Execution Off-Target Brand Identity/Product Positioning Brand Identity Was not Meaningful or Relevant Brand Identity Became Dated and Ineffective Target Customers Preferences Changed Other Unexpected Product Profile Feature Brand Identity Targeted Limited/Shrinking Market Incorrect Pricing N =19
Copyright Best Practices, LLC
BEST PRACTICES,
LLC
REFINE POSITION
Refine First Launch message Sharpen target groups Fine-tune mix Refine field tactics to win first trial use
REFOCUS POSITION
Refocus message Refocus on different target group(s) Shift mix Some new training
EXPAND POSITION
Expand message to greater positioning Expand targets Expand sales force Shift Mix New training
REPOSITION COMPLETELY
Change team Change position Shift targets Change or expand sales forces Revise marketing plan Major new training
BEST PRACTICES,
LLC
However, underlying every successful product re-launch is a core message that supports and enforces the re-defined brand character. Savvy brand leaders clarify and revise messaging at re-launch to emphasize the products strongest new features or most viable new markets. Successful core message changes in this study are most frequently based upon product efficacy, improved quality of patient life or new population groups that could benefit from using a drug.
Brand Character
When re-defining brand character, benchmarked companies communicated the importance of re-setting product positioning. This includes re-setting core promotional messages and positioning for unmet medical need. In addition, executives consistently stressed the importance of focusing on product benefits instead of features. Rate the effectiveness of different techniques for redefining brand character and brand story in the market place.
Not Used Not Effective 5% 32% 17% 12% 6% 11% 17% 12% 6% Highly Effective Somewhat Effective
Re-set Core Promotional Message Re-set Positioning for Unmet Medical Need Re-articulate Benefits Re-articulate Positioning
Vis--vis Core Competitor(s)
N =19
Not Used
Ineffective
Highly Effective
BEST PRACTICES,
LLC
Of a dozen factors companies use to underpin their core messaging at re-launch, product efficacy is the most common and is judged by the benchmark respondents to be the most beneficial. Partners also frequently employ safety, unmet medical needs, targeting new patient sub-populations, ease-of-use, therapeutic treatment differences, and quality of life / patient compliance to support new messages.
Core Message
The products core message must align with the re-defined brand character. Consequently, unmet medical need is not only instrumental in re-defining the brand character but also in re-setting the core message. In addition, efficacy is also a top factor contributing to re-defining the products core message.
Which factors were most helpful in re-defining the products core message at re-launch?
Not Used Not Effective 5% 32% 17% 28% 21% 17% 21% 28% 26% 22% 11% 18% 35% N =19 Not Used 28% 16% 6% 11% 28% 18% 18% Ineffective 17% 11% 5% Efficacy Unmet medical need Targeting new patient sub-population with clear target patient description Differences from current therapies Safety Patient quality of life Ease-of-use/patient compliance No/reduced side effects Duration Cost effectiveness Dosing Health outcomes Somewhat Ineffective Highly Effect. Somewhat Effect. 74% 47% 44% 39% 37% 33% 32% 22% 21% 21% 22% 22% 37% 22% 32% 44% 42% 16%
Highly Effective
BEST PRACTICES,
LLC
Carefully orchestrate all communication tools to help physicians understand the products new position relative to the target market of patients who will benefit from the medicine.
One of the most critical aspects of a successful re-launch is communicating new messages to the physician population. Brand teams want physicians to understand thoroughly which patient-type, segment or subpopulation the product treats in order to win initial physician trials. Benchmark partners find that communicating the targeted patient type by diagnostic name or segment is the most effective method of winning physician understanding for a new message. Over half the benchmark class rates this method highly effective and, of brand managers who had used the method, the rating of highly effective increased to 56 percent. No other method garnered above a 29 percent rating of highly effective.
Physician Communication
Communicating patient diagnostic type by name/segment is critical to help physicians identify the best target patients. Most benchmarked companies leveraged a combination of the following tactics to help physicians understand the best target population or the product to win initial physician trial. Which factors most helped physicians understand the patient type, segment or sub-population best for the new product to win initial physician trial?
Not Used Not Effective 22% 18% 29% 22% 6% 22% 22% 71% 47% 6%12% 11% 22% Patient Type by Diagn. Name/Segment Patients Needs/Wants from Patients View Symptom Classification Patients Needs/Wants from Physician View Classif. by Non-Respond. for Current Therapies Other Classification by Side Effects 29% 28% 28% 22% 14% 14% 35% Highly Effective Highly Effective 56% 24% 44% 39% 33% Somewhat Effective 22% Short/Long term cost effectiveness Long term benefits for the patient category Needs & wants from third party payer's view Needs & wants from caregivers/patient family's view Somewhat Effective
N =19
Not Used
Ineffective
Somewhat Ineffective
BEST PRACTICES,
LLC
Successful re-launch requires significant investment usually above the levels of the entrenched market competition and the companys own first launch.
Re-launches require an enormous amount of resources. In fact, the majority of the benchmark class spent more than 100 percent of the initial launch and market leader investment. While the actual investment levels vary by brand, the amount remains substantial. To be heard in a competitive marketplace, relaunched products need to promote themselves above the established levels of the competition. Benchmark partners revealed that 60 percent of the class invested at 100 to 200 percent relative to the existing competitive landscape during re-launch.
What percent of a core brands investment levels are required for a re-launched product to successfully establish its own brand identity?
151%-200% 5% More than 200% 5% 40-60% 26%
121%-150% 32%
"Unless you have an incredible amount of resources you can bring to bear, you need 12-24 months to have the effect you want. - A leading Pharmaceutical Company
N =19
101-120% 11%
81%-100% 5%
61%-80% 16%
BEST PRACTICES,
LLC
Sales force strategy needs to fit the re-launch approach and scope to place resources where they will make a difference.
Re- invigorated sales force support is crucial to the success of any re-launch effort. Field force adjustment tactics must fit the product teams strategy to re-position or re-focus the brand. In some circumstances, the key to success may lie in expanding sales resources. In other instances, sales force effectiveness may lie in enhanced training. For example, a re-launch product requiring relatively modest changes such as a sharpened image may not require a larger sales force but rather better training for the sales organization or a higher product position among more sales reps. A product that is being expanded to cover new indications might require training
but also increased staffing. Benchmark partners identified various factors to consider when evaluating sales force changes: Should the sales force size be expanded? Should the product position be elevated within a sales force? Will different customer segments need to be targeted and penetrated? Will new incentives be required to win support? Will new training be essential to sales force success?
The study attempts to support all best practices harvested with valuable real world experiences from the case studies. In the Zithromax re-launch Pfizer innovatively leveraged the expertise of two former competing sales forces to support the re-launch effort:
All managers went through a training process to ensure that the sales force would be up to speed for a re-launch.
Copyright Best Practices, LLC
BEST PRACTICES,
LLC
10
This study presents research from Best Practices, LLCs pharmaceutical marketing practice study titled, Product Re-Launch Excellence: Transforming lackluster Pharmaceutical Products Into Market Success Stories. Additional pharmaceutical marketing studies include: Building Pharmaceutical Brand Identity Through Internet Presence Best Practices in Pharmaceutical Brand Management Launching Pharmaceutical Megabrands: Best Practices in Marketing Blockbusters Developing a High-Performance Market Research Function
Contact Best Practices at (919) 403-0251 or bestpractices@best-in-class.com for more information about this research or on how to apply our insights and capabilities to optimize your medical affairs activities.
11