Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
March 2010
Finance
March 2010
1 / 22
This class
Generic factor models Example: the CAPM Conditional vs. unconditional models The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Finance
March 2010
2 / 22
Finance
March 2010
3 / 22
Proof
Since E[Rj ] =
Finance
March 2010
5 / 22
This class
Generic factor models Example: the CAPM Conditional vs. unconditional models The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Finance
March 2010
6 / 22
The CAPM
A capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is a model in which: Mt+1 = at + bt RW ,t+1 Such a model can be derived in a number of models. We will cover: A two period quadratic utility model Rubinsteins (1976) log utility model Mertons (1973) intertemporal capital asset pricing model ICAPM
Finance
March 2010
7 / 22
Now, use the last result: E[Ri,t+1 ] = t + i,t t where i,t = (Et [RW ,t+1 RW ,t+1 )1 Et [RW ,t+1 Ri,t+1 ]. How can we nd ?
Alex Stomper (MIT, IHS & VGSF) Finance March 2010 8 / 22
Et [RW ,t+1 ] is determined by: E[RW ,t+1 ] = t + 1t Thus: E[Ri,t+1 ] = t + i,t (E[RW ,t+1 ] t ) where t is the expected return of a zero-beta asset. If a risk-free asset exists, t = rf ,t .
Finance
March 2010
9 / 22
pW ,t = Et
=0
M Ct+ = Et
=0
ct Ct+ = ct Ct+ 1
+ 1 Ct+1
1 ct
RW ,t+1
1 Ct+1 1 = ct Mt+1
Finance
March 2010
10 / 22
Discussion
So, Mt+1 = 1/RW ,t+1 . Why do we get this result? Because the eects of news of higher future consumption Ct+ on the value of the wealth portfolio are oset by changes in the discount factor Mt+ . How about a factor representation? The discrete time log utility model can only represented as Mt+1 = at + bt RW ,t+1 by means of a Taylor approximation. An exact linearization is often possible in continuous time since diusion processes are locally normally distributed - we will see this when we talk about the ICAPM. Or, we assume normally distributed returns and factors...
Finance
March 2010
11 / 22
Steins lemma
Steins lemma: If F and R are bivariate normal, is a dierentiable function and E[| [F ]|] < , then Cov[[F ], R] = E[ [F ]]Cov[F , R]
Finance
March 2010
12 / 22
i.e.
Mt+1 = = Et [[Ft+1 ]] E[ [Ft+1 ]]Et [Ft+1 ] + E[ [Ft+1 ]]Ft+1 at + bt Ft+1
where Wt+1 = RW ,t+1 (et ct ), RW ,t+1 = wt Rt+1 and t are state variables that may describe relative price changes, changes in the investment opportunity set, etc. We will consider a continuous time model. Recall: Et Assume that t = exp[t]VW [Wt , t ]. dt Wt VWW [Wt , t ] dW VW [Wt , t ] = dt + + dt t VW [Wt , t ] W VW [Wt , t ]
Alex Stomper (MIT, IHS & VGSF) Finance March 2010 14 / 22
A factor model
dt dpj,t t pj,t VW [Wt , t ] dpt dWt dpj,t Et dt rf ,t dt + RRt Et Wt pj,t VW [Wt , t ] pt rf ,t + RRt Covt [RW ,t+1 , Rj,t+1 ] + t Covt [t+1 , Rj,t+1 ] rf ,t dt Et
Finance
March 2010
15 / 22
Conditioning
This class
Generic factor models Example: the CAPM Conditional vs. unconditional models The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Finance
March 2010
16 / 22
Conditioning
1 = Et [at ]Et [Rj,t+1 ]+Et [bt ]Et [Ft+1 Rj,t+1 ]+Covt [at , Rj,t+1 ]+Covt [bt , Ft+1 Rj, so, we need that Covt [at , Rj,t+1 ] = Covt [bt , Ft+1 Rj,t+1 ] = 0 for 1 = Et [(Et [at ] + Et [bt ]Ft+1 )Rj,t+1 ]
Alex Stomper (MIT, IHS & VGSF) Finance March 2010 17 / 22
Conditioning
Implications
A model that implies a conditional linear factor model with respect to a particular information set that cannot be observed. As a consequence, such models cannot be tested. Examples: the two period quadratic utility model, models based on normally distributed returns (Steins lemma),... Exception: models like the log-utility model (M = 1/RW ) can be tested using GMM. A partial solution: we could try to model the variation in at and bt in Mt+1 = at + bt Ft+1 : at = at and bt = bt Mt+1 = at + bt Ft+1 is a model with factors t , Ft+1 , t Ft+1 . The variables zt are referred to as instruments.
Alex Stomper (MIT, IHS & VGSF) Finance March 2010 18 / 22
The APT
This class
Generic factor models Example: the CAPM Conditional vs. unconditional models The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Finance
March 2010
19 / 22
The APT
A statistical model
Suppose that asset returns can be described by the following factor decomposition: Rj = aj + j F + j Rj = E[Rj ] + j (F E[F ]) + j where E[
j k]
Finance
March 2010
20 / 22
The APT
No arbitrage
Lets assume that we can set up well-diversied portfolios s.t. RP = wR E[wR] + P F where w is the vector of portfolio weights and R is a vector of asset returns. No arbitrage requires that:
1 0 0 E[M](E[RP ] rf ) E[RP ] rf E[RP ] rf w E[R] rf E[Rj ] rf
Alex Stomper (MIT, IHS & VGSF)
= = = = = = = =
The APT
Lets construct a portfolio Qi with a unit beta vector Qi (i.e. a vector the ith component of which equals one while all other components are zero). Line 6 of our last derivation implies: E[RQi ] rf = i Thus, E[Rj ] rf =
i
j,i (E[RQi ] rf )
Finance
March 2010
22 / 22