IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF GEORGIA
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
SCOTT M. HERRMANN
State Bar Number 349345,
Respondent.
) SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO.
)
)
) STATE DISCIPLINARY BOARD
) DOCKET NO. 6136
)
NOTICE OF DISCIPLINE
The Office of the General Counsel, State Bar of Georgia has been
directed by the Investigative Panel of the State Disciplinary Board to issue a
Notice of Discipline for disbarment against Respondent Scott M. Herrmann, in
the above-referenced case. This Notice is issued pursuant to Bar Rule
4-208.1 ofthe Rules and Regulations for the Organization and Government of
the State Bar of Georgia. The Investigative Panel shows the Court the
following in support of this Notice:
1.
After full investigation, the Investigative Panel of the State Disciplinary
Board has found probable cause to believe that Respondent has violated
Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct 1.15(1), 1.15(II), 8.4 and 9.3.
2.
The facts supporting the Panel's decision are as follows:
a. In or about October 2006, Mr. Clint Rosenberg retained
Respondent to represent him in business related litigation.
b. In or about 2010, Mr. Rosenberg authorized Respondent to settle
the litigation.
c. Respondent received settlement funds on Mr. Rosenberg's behalf
in the amount of$375,000. Mr. Rosenberg instructed Respondent
to pay himself $45,000 for legal fees, to distribute $30,000 to a
third party, and to distribute the remaining balance of$300,000 to
Mr. Rosenberg's bank as payment on a loan.
d. Respondent did not deliver the $300,000 payment to Mr.
Rosenberg's bank for 2 months.
e. Respondent has failed to distribute the third party payment of
$30,000, and has failed to account for those funds.
f. Respondent withdrew fiduciary funds from his trust account for his
own use and has converted those funds.
g. Respondent was served by publication with the Notice of
Investigation in this matter on June 17,2011.
h. Respondent failed to respond to the Notice ofInvestigation in
accordance with the Bar Rules.
-2-
3.
The Investigative Panel has determined that the appropriate disciplinary
sanction to be imposed upon Respondent is disbarment.
4.
Bar Rule 4-208.2(a)(4) requires that the Panel state the reasons that it
recommends that Respondent be disbarred. In aggravation ofthe level of
discipline to be imposed in this case, the Investigative Panel considered the
following factors:
(a) Respondent has experience in the practice oflaw, and has
been a member of the State Bar of Georgia since 1993.
(b) Respondent failed to respond to the Notice ofInvestigation
in this case.
(c) Respondent's dishonest conduct has caused the complainant
significant financial harm.
5.
Bar Rule 4-208.3 as amended is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated by this reference.
6.
As required by Bar Rule 4-208.2(a)(6), the Memorandum of Grievance
filed by Clint Rosenberg is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by
this reference.
7.
Asrequired by Bar Rule 4-208.2(a)(7), Respondent's disciplinary history
is as follows:
- 3 -
(a) Respondent currently has no history of discipline, though a motion
for Respondent's interim suspension pursuant to Bar Rule 4-204.3
was filed with the Court on October 31,2011.
WHEREFORE, the State Bar of Georgia prays that this Court enter an
order disbarring Respondent.
This ~ a y of November, 2011
STATE BAR OF GEORGIA
Office of the General Counsel
104 Marietta Street, NW
Suite 100
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
(404) 527-8720
J@' Y . Mittelman
D p- General Counsel
State Bar Number 513 828
-4-
Rl.lle4-208.3. Rejection of Notice of Discipline.
(a) In order to reject The Notice of Discipline the respondent or
the Office of General Counsel must file a Notice of Rejection of the
Notice of Discipline with the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Georgia
within thirty (30) days following service of the Notice of Discipline.
In the event service was accomplished by certified mail, the
respondent shall have thirty-three (33) days from the date the
Notice of Discipline was mailed to file the Notice of Rejection.
(b) Any Notice of Rejection by the respondent shall be served
upon the Office of the General Counsel of the State Bar of Georgia.
Any Notice of Rejection by the Office of the General Counsel of the
State Bar of Georgia shall be served upon the respondent. No
rejection by the Respondent shall be considered valid unless the
Respondent files a written response to the pending grievance at or
before the filing of the rejection. A copy of such written response
must also be filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court at the time of
filing the Notice of Rejection.
(c) The timely filing of a Notice of Rejection shall constitute an
election for the Supreme Court to appoint a Special Master and the
matter shall thereafter proceed pursuant to Rules 4-209 through
4-225.
STATE BAR
OF GEORGIA
EXHIBIT#-LA'-'--___ I
CASE> ('(3 e
STATE BAR OF GEORGIA
GRIEVANCE -
CONFIDENTIAL "
d J" 'I
U U
Please type or print legibly.
All C STATE BAR OF GEORGIA
YOUR NAME: (Mr.lMrs./Ms.)_-.!.I"-; v"7b
M A ILl N GAD D R ES S: __ o-;slo--'.'II----'-'IIAc-.:'c:::/...-='---'-';2.c:::D:......
Street or P. O. Box City !;tate' Zip
YOUR PHONE NUMBERS: (W) 2'1'8 -5"'82..- 0300 (H) 2<18-2'(0 -1'/88
NAME OF THE ATTORNEY: Mt.. SGOrr /'4. /kI2ftfAtVN
Fill-out-a separate fonn for each attorney. Do not list law firms.
DATE OF FIRST CONTACT WITH ATTORNEY: aCT. 2DOIO DATE OF LAST CONTACT WITH ATTORNEY: 5oJT: 2. 0(0
DOES THIS ATTORNEY CURRENTLY REPRESENT YOU?
STATE WHAT THE ATTORNEY HAS DONE OR HAS.:NOTDONE THA-T-CAUSES YOU TO SUBMIT THIS RE'PORT.
Ifmore space is needed, please attach other pages. Please do not write on the back.
Return to: State Bar of Georgia
Office of the General Counsel
1 04 Marietta Street, NW
Suite 100
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
"1 affirm that the information I have pr vided here is true to the best of my knowledge."
__
DATE: _--,--1_-'..'12:= '-.---'1..:.1 ________ _
OPTIONAL: PLEASE PROVIDE THE NAME AND PHONE NUMBER OF SOMEONE WE CAN CONTACT IF WE HAVE
DIFFICULTY CONTACTING YOU;
NAMEOFCONTACTPERSON: __ ____________________________
PHONE NUMBERS OF CONTACT PERSON: (W) 2'18- LfS'i-- 9200
(H) 0IC:r
OF GEORGIA
IF YOU HAVE A DISABILITY AND NEED ASSISTANCE IN THE GRIEVANCE PROC
PLEASE CONTACT THE ADA COORDINATOR AT (404) 527-8720 OR (800) 334-68 EXHIBIT#.'-,-8!..L::-___ 1
CASE" (Rr?V
To whom it may concern:
<' _ J ~ a m filing this grievance against Mr. Scott Herrmann because he has wrongfully converted
approximately $30,000 of my money. (See attached complaint filed in Oaldand County Circuit Court,
Pontiac, Michigan).
I am the owner of Tyler Sales, Inc. (dba Northern Metals, Inc.) a Michigan corporation. I filed a
lawsuit in Georgia against Scovill Fasteners, Inc. in July of2005. In approximately October of2006, I
was first introduced to Mr. Scott Herrmann and retained his professional services.
In May of 2007, Mr. Herrmann left the mm he was at al1d started his own firm. I was forced to retain
his services as I couldn't afford to start over with new counsel after paying almost $20,000.00. I signed
the paperwork and gave him a retainer of $4,000.00. Years went by and trial dates got pushed back and
re-scheduled. The lack of communicatiofrwas constant and many errors were made by Mr. Herrmrum,
including, but not limited to, not.f1ling all-answer to Summary Judgment and a clerical error during trial
missing an entire year of interest I could have recovered (approx. $50,000.00). I also reminded him
several times to ask for legal fees during trial, but he failed to do so until closing argument, at which
point the judge said it was too late-to seek legal fees.
Despite Mr. Herrmrum's deficiencies, I won the trial. I continuously told my creditors not to foreclose
on my business and was assured the money was coming by Mr. Hermann. However, appeals ensued,
and I eventually negotiated a settlement (due in large part to Scovill's new CEO and myself talking on
----the telephone) with Scovill. Prior to thiscSettlement agreement, I made sure I knew my legal costs that , , ~ ~ "
would come out of the proceeds. I agreed to a settlement of $375,000.00. Of this settlement, I
instructed Mr. Herrmann to pay his $45,000 in legal fees and to distribute $30,000.00 owed to a
supplier whose debt was directly related to the suit. He would then distribute the remaining balance of
$300,000.00 to my bank in which I had a secured line of credit that needed to be paid down. Despite
previously stating that his fees were $45,000, Mr. Herrmann then unilaterally decided that he was owed
$55,000.
After almost 2 months of calling everyday and hiring an additional Michigal1law firm to call and send
letters, I received a wire transfer to my bill1lc for $300,000.00. However, Mr. Herrmrum retained the
other $30,000 he was supposed to distribute. I then called every day, at least 2 times per day, to both of
his phone numbers and sent numerous e-mails regarding this sum. Again, I retained legal services to
send letters and leave phone messages for Mr. Scott Herrmann. NOTHING. He completely
disappeared with my money.
During this time, I was in Atlanta, GA for personal business al1d went to his listed address that I had on
file and was greeted by a doorman. They called upstairs to his residence and I was told he wasn't there
(though it appeared that the doorman and he spoke on the phone). I quickly asked to spealc to Mr.
Herrmrum. He took my phone call but quicldy said he was in Ohio visiting family and that he would
contact me when he got back to town in the next couple days. I extended my trip to wait and spealc to
--h1m as promised and NOTHING, again. I therefore retumed home and contracted the legal services
once again of David Hansma at Mantese Honigmill1 Rossmill1 and Williamson, P.C.
We filed a lawsuit in Oaldill1d County Circuit Court in Michigill1, case number 1O-1l3136-CZ, on
September 3, 2010. After several service attempts, Mr. Herrmann disappeared once again ill1d we were
forced to file other costly motions to [mally obtain a default judgment for the amOlmt owed. (See
attached default judgment).
I am here. Still worldng hard in a Metro Detroit economy that is trying to make a comeback. I have
lost many business opportunities, had to pay additional legal fees to avoid a supplier lawsuit that was
owed and promised money from the Scovill settlement. In total, Mr. Herrmann was paid over
$60,000.00 and has retained an additional $75,000.00. I am asldng for any help that I can get in
collecting my money (Judgment) and restoring my faith in the legal system. I have many friends and
colleagues who are lawyers. They are troubled by the actions of Mr. Herrmann and amazed at the
length of the suit, the appeal process, the complete lack of communication, the complete lack of care on
.Mr. Herrmann's part, and the wrongful retention of my money. I sincerely hope that your professional
----organization imposes appropriate sanctions. I would strongly welcome the opportunity to present my
issues in person. You may also.cQutactMr. Hansma at Mantese Honigman Rossman and Williamson,
P.C. at (248) 457-9200.
Sincerely,

Clint Rosenberg,
Northern Metals, Inc.
,
11/27/2005
2395418732
LMI, CO.
PAGE 01(04
706 7S{ .6 En OLSON
Il1J 006
r; .
. .
IN TH.E STATE COURT OF GWlNNETT COlJ,N1Y
STATE OJ!' GEORqIA
NOil:rlIERN METALS, lNC. )
I'laillti.ff,
vs
) CIVlL ACTlON .FlU!: NO.
)

)
SCOVlLL FASTENERS, INC.
)
)
Defendallt.
COMPLAtN'X' FORlUtEArn OF CONTRACT ANn'FuR
ATTOlll'IEY'S FEES UNDJ!lR D.C.G.A, 13-6-n' .
COMES NOW, 1he Plaintlfffu the w<J'ie_captioned :wHo" and sh_st.b.i,s cOUl'llhe
. following facts:
1.
Di:f<m.dllUt, Scovill Fail'leneW, Inc. ("Scovill'')'ittay be .erved by sen/ing its registered
agent which is The P;entice Hall Corp. at 40 Technology Parkway Sm,th, #300, No1'(;toss,
GWJ:NNETT COUNl"l, Georgia arid is therefore subject to the jnrisdiction and venue oftbl$
court.
.2.
The Plaintiff, (''Northern'') is a Mlcbigan <mmpany who imporl$, e"potts and dlittributes
metal prQducts.
3.
The Defuud.,mt requested bids on variotIs items wIth ceJ:I"';u specificatio(lS,
otherwise known as lots.
4.
The Plaintifi'bid on 62 items 1 and 2) based <ill the annual ge stated in lbe bid
PAGE Rcm A.T PM lEa.gt.em DaytJQt)t SVR:rurucHTFAX/f1" tmr$;4g050 3158
E
(mm-:!ls):U28
" .:,,'
,
11/27/2006 12:12 2395418732
LMI, CD.
PAGE 02/04
'07:20/2D05 15:08 70S 754 ,'8 ED OLSON
'-"
req\li:st. (See Exhibit "A;' atw.ched hereto)
5 .
. rhe l)efend!ll;\!"is$uedp1Jmliase 'orders for' the 62 items OIJ. which they accepted 1:\10
Plaintiffs bidJ,rice for fabrication of the metal.
6.
The requ1:r='=bythe purchase uxd"" to keep the vanon'! (terns in iuV"ll(ory so
that they could be delivered wh!)n they were requested to be by ilia Defendant. The
purchase orders contain tlJn1lnn lIT Delivetywhlch l'equl.res immediate delivery after the order
i8 placed. (See attached hereto as Exltibit''B'')
7.
The Plai1lti.ffkept the reqmred amo\lllt 'of goo& "vaiJ:;,Ille fnr'delivery on 62 ofllie
8.
A. sepru:ute purchase ordf\\" was tequested to be .shipped to China but time franie to
fabricate and sl'l.ip /hose ite=. was appro"imately 15 wee!m and !haitim6 futmo was
eom.m.un.i.cated to the Defendant at tjle time the order mw eVetl though ihe ",del'
oruy hAd" fi"" shipment fulJ.e futmc.
9.
Th" :Plaintiff sh\ppod the goods 10 China as orderod which were invoiced' On 8/i Sf\}4 in
the amQunt. !Il;\d 9/9/04 in the amourit of
10.
The Defend!ll;lls have failed !Il;\d rewed to pay for the Chinese .hlp*"mt in the principal
11/27/2005 12:12
2395418732
LMI,CO.
PAGE 03/04
,
07!"O/"'"' 1.:59 Fal 106 ;8
',; .
lID OLSON I1liO"S
,
amQ\U\t of$84,882.31 ;yiiliin the sl1;;\y (60) dayteuns whioh wer" lnotLldedill 1he purchase
orders. (See example attached ,;. E1<.Wbil "A")
11.
The i.qJ:<\rest state<foon each invoice is 18% .1'''' rumUIU after sbety (60) days from invoice
date.
12.
The Phintiff shi:pped Within the U:S. between januory 200S lilld March 2005 and
Il.ot been paid the principal Sum of$196,292.98.
Ule Plaintiff COlltlll.>e8U) have an m..vento,y of goods purchased for the Defendant which
is vlllued at the fubricatiOllyriceQid plus the dQst of m.ctal at tue time tht the goods $hollld have
'. .
been shil'l.'ed. the value of the inventorY;s $241,036.61 ba.lC(t on the cost of m<';tal
. duringlhe periq!i When th;:, goods would have been sbipped bi,t for tbe Defendant's b,eaehes of
contract.
14.
The Defendant has notordered any of tbdnventory on hand which has caused the
Plalntiff to Ulcur st.orage charges on a contimling
15.
':the Defendants cOntinue to breach the ponirac\ll causing the Plaintiff various aud
16.
The Defundant has acted in oad faith and has cauoed Ullll.ece$sary w"uble and expiOnSe.

2395418732

PAGE 04/04
'.
B ED OLSON"
I@oos
: ::.,
17 .
.M a result of the Defendant's conduct as dellCribed mparagxaph 16, they are liable to the
flaintifffote-xpensea of Htlgatio
n
and ,ltomey's tee, O.C.G.A. 13-6-11.
WlIllREFOlUl, the Plainti4EJlm]18 for judgment agai"s, the Defend""t .. f<ll1o"ws: "
" a) the principal aiun uf$196,292,98 to, the recci.vab16 bak'UlCe;
b) the Principal. olID1-o$S4,a82.31 for the China ordor, IDld "
a) the principal sum of appre*im.ately $241,036.01; and
d) C(lst of stOrage of materialsheld for "the Defend",,\; and
e) interest on each sum; and
f) attomey's f"08 incwTed"and OlSCperu;es oflitigal;on; mld
!D all <JUwr amountS deemed just and due.
JBenberg & HewItt P.C.
7000 Peachtree Dunwoody Row!
:Bldg. 15, Suite 100
Atlanta, Georgia 303;18
770,.3514400, 770-828-0100 (faCsimile) "
):rlsetJberg@isenberg-Mwitt.com
FILED It! OFFICE
CLEllL 'j'\7F rOU'lf
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GWINNETT CQ1J:lI!
1
i-
Y
T GA
STATE OF GEORGIA
2008 MAY 28 PM 3: 48
NORTHERN METALS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
) . I
) CIVJL ACTION FlLE LAWLER. CLERK
v.
SCOVlIL FASTENERS, m.,
Defendant.
) FILE NO. 05-C-8839-4
)
)
)
. JUDGMENT
The Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Breach of Contract and For Attorney's Fees Under
O.C.G.A. 13-6-11 on July 19, 2005. The Defendant filed an Answer andCmmterclaimfor
Breach of Contract and Statutory Interestwld Expenses of Litigation on September 1, 2005.
The above styled matter came before the GOfu-t for bench trial May 12 through 14, 2008. Upon a
consideration of the Pleadings, Evidence presented and Argument of Counsel,. the Court makes
the following findings offacrand conclusions 0flaw:
The Court finds that the Parties did in fact enter into a two year contra:ct for the supplying
by the Plaintiff of certain tYPes of metal products to the Defendailt at its plant in Georgia in
February of 2004. The first delivery of product \yas scheduled for June of2004. The contract
terms were not contained in anyone document The contract terms are contained in .the
. nefenclant'srequest for bids, the subsequent verbal negotiations between
.. PO's. sent by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, and the running annual usage dot;umiintaridthe stuck
requirements docutnei1t provided via emaiI frum the Defendant to the PlaintifK . The-Parnes bbfu
performedunderthe terms of this con met (The American contract).
The Parties entered into a second contract for the one-time sale of metal produeifroIl1 the
Plaintiff to the Defendant at the Defendant's new plant in China in May of 2004. Tl'ie delivery of
the product was schidWed fur June of20J4. (The China contract).
As to the American contract, the Court finds that the Plaintiff did provide metal products
to the Defendant which the Defendant paid for late or did not pay for at alL From the beginning
date of the contract, the Plaintiff delivered products late. However, the Defendant accepted the
product and in tum paid for it late - well beyond the contracted for 60 day payment period. Both
Parties breached the terms of the contract from the beginning and both cbntiiluedto perlortn
under the contract. To date several invoices for product delivered to the Defendant have not been
paid for at all. The behavior of both Parties became circular in that late deliveries and late
payments led to more late and withheld deliveries and more late and withheJd payments. Neither
Party has clean hands and both have breached the contract. By December of2004, the contract
had been terminated by bothyarties. The Plaintiff notified the Defendant that the Plaintiff
refused to deliver anymore product until payments were made. Defendant responded by
instrncting the Plaintiff not to order any more product for the Defendant. Although some product
and payments were the first of2005, these transactions were follow through on
transactions begun in-ZQ04. 2005 transaetions were in essence clean up. The balance on
invoiceS for product delivered, accepted and not paid for by the Defendant on the American
contract is $196,292.99
.As to the China contract, the Court find. that the Plaintiff did not deliver the product
contracted. for until August and Beptember of 2004, some 2 to 3 months after the contracted for
delivery date. However, the Defendant did accept the product when delivered. The Defendant
never attempted to reject delivery or return any of the product delivered. The Defendant did not
buy the product from another supplier or present any evidence of any loss suffered as a result of
the late delivery. The Defendant has not made any payment for the product delivered. The Court
finds that the principal amoUnt owed for the product delivered to China is $84,882.31.
The total principal amount owed on the American contract and the China contract is
$281,175.29.
Under the American contract the Defendant was to pay invoices within 60 days. The
Plaintiff has sought interest in the amount of 18% on unpaid invoices. Under 7-4-16 Plaintiff is .
entitled to 1.5% per month (18% per year) interest in that the Parties are engaged in a commercial
contract. However, the Plamtiffbegan calculating interest after 30 days, instead of the 60 days
provided for in the Parties' contract. The Court finds that the Plaintiff is entitled to interest on
the unpaid invoices. Interest would not accrue until after the 60 day payment period. The
Plaintiff has not provided any evidence as to what the interest calculations would be on each
invoice after 60 days. The Court therefore fmds that the Plaintiff is entitled to 18% interest on the
total unpaid balance of the invoices on the American contract beginning 61 days after the last
invoice was sent on March 21,2005. The Court finds this date to be May 21,2005. At trial the
Plaintiff sought interest only through May 12, 2007. Clint Rosenberg for the Plaintiff testified
that the Plaintiff sought interest through May 12, 2007 in the amount of $77, 436.35 on the
American contract and in the amount of $40, 162.03 on the China contract. Plaintiff did not
request interest on the unpaid amounts past this date. The Court finds the appropriate amount of
interest on the American contract through the date sought by the Plaintiff to be $70,665.47 and
on the China contract to 00$38,655.40. The total amount of interest on the two contracts as
sought by the Plaintiff is $-109,320.86.
The Court does n()Mind that the Plaintiff is entitled to recover any additional damages
against the Defendant induding damages-for the product held in a warehouse and eventually sold
to the Defendant.
The -Court therefol'eJ'inds by a preponderance of the evidence in favor of and hereby
enters a JUdgment in favor-oflhe Plaintiff and against the Defendant in the principal sum of
$281,175.29 and prejudgment interest in the amount of $109,320.86 for a total Judgmentin the
amount of $390,496.15. Said amount shall accrue post judgment interest from the date of
Judgment forward at the legal rate of 8% .
. The Defendant filed a Counterclaim against the Plaintiff seeking damages for additional
amounts it alleges it was forced to pay to other venders to obtain the metal products that the
Plaintiff should have provided under the American contract. The Court finds that the Defendant
did in fact obtain metal product from other venders at a higher cost than what it had contracted to
pay the Plaintiff for the same product. The Court further finds that the Plaintiff s failure to
delivery the metal product in a timely manner under the contract was the cause of the Defendant
incurring these costs- cover damages. However, the Court does not find that the Defendant is
entitled to recover the difference in price on all of the purchases presented from other venders.
The Court finds that the Defendant is not entitled to recover where the amount of metal product
purchased from other venders exceeded the amounts required to be kept on hand in the annual
usage and stock requirement document provided by the Defendant to the Plaintiff. The Court
finds that the Defendant was made aware of the fact that the Defendant would need three months
lead time to stock product that exceeded the stock amounts required by the Plaintiff during the.
negotiations to enter the American contract in January/February 2004. Having been made aware
of the three month lead time, the Defendant still entered into a contract 'With the Plaintiff. The
Court finds that the amount of cover damages the Defendant is entitled to recover from the
Plaintiff to be $ 13,516.00
The Defendant further contends that the Plaintiff in fact overcharged on certain invoices
in that the calculation used to price the metal product was done incorrectly. The Court finds that
the Plaintiff did in fact miscalculate the contracted for price on certain invoices and that the
Defendant is entitled to recover for said overcharges. The Court.finds that the amount that the
Defendant is entitled to r.ecover from the Plaintiff for overcharges is $ 8194.45.
The Court does not fmd that the Defendant is entitled to recover any additional damages.
The Comt finds that the contract between the Parties was breached by and ended by both of the
Parties in December of 20ll4: The Gourt does not finds that the Defendant is entitled to recover
any cover damages fo!" the year 2005 after the contract had been terminated. The Court does not
find that the Defendant is entitled to recover any damages for overhead costs. The Defendant
was capable of and did j n ~ j : a c t acquire metal product from other venders to keep the factory in
operation. The Defendant has failed to show that any slow down or shut down in production was
the fault of the Plaintiff as opposed to its own failure or inability to pay venders for the product it
needed.
The Court therefure finds by a preponderance of evidence in favor of the Defendant and
efIters Judgment in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff in the amount $21710.45 .
. Said judgments shall accrue post-judgment interest at the legal rate of 8%.
It is so Ordered, this 27 day of May, 2008.
cc: Attorney Scott M. Hermann
Attorney John G. Diespriet
V. E. Head, Judge State Court
By Designation
. : , ;-; IN j)t '" !:
IN THE STATE COURT OF GWINNETT
STATE OF GEORGIA
2010 JUN 29 PH 12: 36
NORTHERN METAL8,lNC.,
TOM lJ\\'VU::n, CLEhK
P1aintiff,
v.
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.
05C-08839-4
SCOVILL FASTENERS, INC.,
Befel1dant.
MUTUAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL CLAIMS
COME NOW Plaintiff Northern Meta)s, Inc. and Defendant Scovi11 Fasteners, Inc. and
hereby dismiss with prejudice any and aU claims and counterclaims, adjudicated and
unadjudicated, in this action with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and
costs.
m
day of June, 2010.
THE HERRMANN LAW FIRM, PC

Georgia Bar Number 349345
Post Office Box 550047
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
Raclel King PoweU '"
Georgia Bar Number 421311
1230 Peachtree Street, N .E.
Suite 3100, Promenade II
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
(404) 815-3662
<"".- -->-'--
Atlanta, Georgia 30355
(404) 627-5291
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant
I"}
IN THE STATE COUR1: OF GWINNETT COUNyiY<, ViH'lY, GA
NORTHERN METKLS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOVILL FASTENER'S, INC.,
Defendant.
STATE OF GEORGIA 20\ 0 JUN 29 12: 34
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.
05C-08839-4
SATISFA.CTION OF JUDGMENT
COMES NOW Northern Metals, Inc., Plaintiff in the above-styled -action, and in
accordance withO.CO.A. 9-13-80, hereby shows that the Judgment entered against Defendant
Scovill Fasteners, Inc. has been released, satisfied, settled, and compromised, by agreement of
the parties.
Scovill Fasteners, Inc., Defendant in the above-styled action, in accordance with
O.C.G.A. 9-13-80, hereby shows that the Judgment entered against Plaintiff Northern Metals,
Inc. has been re!0rd, satisfied, settled, and compromised, by agreement of the parties.
day ofJune, 2010. .
THE HE RMANN LAW FIRM, PC
Scott n
Georgia Bar N ber 349345
Post Office Box 550047
Atlanta, Georgia 30355
(404) 627-5291
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
Rachel King Powell
Georgia Bar Number 421311
1230 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Suite 3100, Promenade II
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
.. (404) 815-3662
Attorneys for Defendant.
NORTHERN METALS, INC.,

v.
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.
05C-08839-4
SCOVILL FASTENE&&, INC.,
Defendant.
JOINT MOTION FOR 0Pd)ER RELEASING SUPERSEDEAS BOND
COME NOW -Plaintiff Northern Metals, Inc. ("NOIihern") and Defendant Scovill
Fasteners, Inc. ("Sco:v:iTl") and move this COU!1 for entry of an Order discharging, releasing and
exonerating Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America ("Travelers"), as surety, and the
Supersedeas Bond bearing Number 105128082 ("Supersedeas Bond"). The Supersedeas Bond
was posted in the amount of $412,990.17 by Travelers, as surety, at the request of Scovill, in
favor of Northem, as judgment creditor, in cqnnection with the above-styled case. As grounds
for the release, the parties show:
An appeal of this case was taken on June 17,2008.
The Supersedeas Bond was posted on August 26, 2008.
The Georgia Court of Appeals entered an order affim1ing in part and reversing in
part the judgment on March 29,2010.
The parties have agreed to settle this action in its entirety on an agreed amount.
By virtue of the settlement, the judgment and counter-judgment have been
satisfied in full. Accordingly, the Supersedeas Bond obligations have been satisfied and

discharged, the Supersedeas Bond is no longer required, and the Supersedeas Bond and
Travelers should be released.
Northern, as judgment creditor, agrees and represents that it does not have an
objection and hereby consents and agrees to the entry of an Order by this COUli
discharginKthe Supersedeas Bond and releasing Travelers and its parents, affiliates and
subsidiaries from any and all liability.
WHEREFORE for the foregoing reasons, the parties through their undersigned counsel
respectfullTTequest- that the Court enter an Order fully and unconditionally discharging,
releasing and exonerating the Supersedeas Bond and releasing Travelers from any and all past,
present and future Iilloility arising under or in connection with the issuance of the Supersedeas
Bond.
June, 2010.
THE HE RMANN LAW FIRM, PC
Scott ann
Georgia Bar Number 349345
Post Office Box 550047
Atlanta, Georgia 30355
(404) 627-5291
Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
Rachel King Powell
Georgia Bar Number 421311
1230 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Suite 3100, Promenade II
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
(404) 815-3662
Attorneys for Defendant
."- -.-. - ,
NORTHERN METALS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOVILL FASTENERS, INC.,
Defendant.
TOM VlvvLtrl, CLEhl',
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.
05C-08839-4
." ... -.,.-_ ..... --_. ---------------
CON:3ENT ORDERTO RELEASE SUPERSEDEAS BOND
This matter having come before the Court on the Joint Motion for DrEier Releasing
Supersedeas Bond, and the Court being fully advised in the matter, and the parties having
reached an agreement on these issues, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED as follows:
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment has been fully satisfied, as evidenced
by the Satisfaction of Judgment to be filed with the Clerk of Court, a copy of which is attached
hereto, and therefore the Supersedeas Bond is no longer required and is hereby fully and
unconditionally discharged, released and exonerated and Travelers Casualty and Surety,
"""Company of America is hereby released from any and all past, present and future liability arising
under or in connection with the issuance of the Supersedeas Bond. This Order is final and non-
appealable by the parties.
SO ORDERED this 29 day of June, 2010.

.. The Honorable Joseph C.
Judge, Gwinnett County State Court
MANTESE HONIGMAN ROSSMAN & WILLIAMSON, PC.
GERARD V. MANTESE
DAVID !VI. HONIGMAN
MARK C, ROSSMAN
IAN M. WILLIAMSON
DAVID F, HANSMA
BRENDAN H. FREY
BRIAN M. SAXE
Scott M," Hermann, Esq.
The Hermal1n Law Firm
PO Box 5509-4-7
Atlanta,
Smh@herrmannlaw.com
ATrORNEYS AND COUNSELORS
August 12, 2010
I 36 I E. BIG BEAVER ROAD
TROY, MI 48083
PHot-IE 248-457-9200
FAX I
WVIfW. MANTEsELAW .COM
Re: Northern Metals v. Scovill Fasteners
Dear Mr. HefP"u:ann:
Our firm represents Clint Rosenberg. We understand that he asked you for the
balance on his account prior to settling the above matter, and you advised him that he
owed yourfirm=$45,000. We now understand you are attempting to bill Mr. Rosenberg for
$55,000-an&YJu are holding money in excess of $70,000 in your account.
Please be advised that if you do not remit the balance of funds held by you, minus
the $45,000 you agreed Mr. Rosenberg owes, within 5 days, we will have no choice but to
file an action for conversion against you, seeking triple damages. We trust this will not be
necessary.
GVM/bsr
Sincerely,
MANTESE HONIGMAN ROSSMAN
ACZILUjMSON, P.C.
;ff;;;,
/rJ {/iAL.
"Gerard V. Mantese
STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND
CLINT ROSENBERG, and
NORTHERN METALS, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
scon M. HERRMANN,
and TI::IEHERRMANN LAW-FIRM,
Defendants.
g ~ ; ; : ' D 10-113136-CZ
111111111 I I 111111111111111111
JUDGE RUDY J. NICHOLS
ROSENBERG,CLI v HERRMANN.sec
__________________________________ ~ I
MANTESE HeN1GMAN RQ:S'SMAN
AND WILLIAMSON, P.C.
Gerard Mantese (P34424)
David HansmaW71 056)
Attorneys for PI'aintiffs
1361 E. Big Beaver Road
Troy, MI 48083
(248) 457-9200
--------------------------------_1
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
t:i5
.,......,.
<#?
U?
r.:g
I
W
.."
:::;;:
Plaintiffs, Clint Rosenberg and Northern Metals, Inc. ("Plaintiffs"), by their attorneys,
Mantese Honigman Rossman and Williamson, P.C., and for their Complaint, state as
follows:
JURISDICTIONAL ALLEGATIONS
1. Plaintiff Northern Metals is a Michigan corporation doing business in this
County and with its address at 1600 E. 11 Mile Road, Madison Heights, MI 48071.
2. Plaintiff Clint Rosenberg is a Michigan resident residing in Oakland County,
and is the sole shareholder of Plaintiff Northern Metals.
3. Defendant The Herrmann Law Firm is a Georgia professional corporation
with its address in Atlanta, Georgia.
4. Defendant Scott Herrmann is the owner and CEO of the Herrmann Law Firm.
5. Defendants' liability arises out of their conversion of Plaintiffs' property.
6. The amount in controversy exceeds $35,000 plus attorney fees and costs.
This Court has-jurisdiction over the Defendants, and venue is proper in this Court.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
7. J1efendants me an attorney and law firm located in Atlanta, Georgia.
8. Plaintiffs hired Defendants to represent them in litigation that was pending
in Georgia.
9. Prior to settling that matter, Plaintiffs asked Defendants forthe balance owing
to Defendants. Defendants informed Plaintiffs that the balance was $45,000.
10. Thereafter, without warning, Defendants unilaterally decided that Plaintiffs'
balance was $55,000.
11. Defendants have refused to acceptthe $45,000 they originally agreed to, and
are holding $75,000 of Plaintiffs' money in their account.
12. Plaintiff has made demands for this money, minus the $45,000 balance
originally agreed to. These demands have been ignored. Defendants know that this
money does not belong to them and are wrongfully retaining it.
COUNT I
STATUTORY AND COMMON LAW CONVERSION
13. Plaintiffs reallege all preceding allegations.
14. Defendants have knowingly, intentionally and wrongfully took, detained or
otherwise converted Plaintiffs' money.
2
15. Defendants have no rights to the excess money being retained. Their actions
constitute unlawful and wrongful dominion and control over Plaintiffs' funds inconsistent
with Defendants' rights therein, and are a conversion.
16. At all times, Defendants' actions were wanton, willful, and malicious, and
Plaintiffs are entitled to exemplary damages.
17. As the proximate result of the Defendants' conversion, Plaintiffs have
sufered=actual damages in the amount of $30,000.
18. Defendants are liable to Plaintiffs for common law and statutory conversion.
19. Underthe conversion statute, Plaintiffs are entitled to treble damages of
$.90,000, plus.costs and reasonable attorney fees. Mel 600.2919a.
WR-EREFORE, Plaintiff requests entry of a Judgment against Defendant in the
amount of $90,000 plus attorney fees and costs, as well as pre-filing and post-filing
interest.
Dated: September 3, 2010
Respectfully Subrnitted,
MANTESE HONIGMAN ROSSMAN
AND WilLIAMSON, p.e.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
__ n- ______ _
Gerard Mantese (P34424)
David Hansrna (P71 056)
1361 E. Big Beaver Road
Troy, MI 48083
(248) 457-9200
3
Approved, SCAO
Onginal - Court
, . 151 copy - Defendant-
10-113136-CZ
II
I
, STATE OF MICHIGAN
JUDICIAL DISTRICT
6th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
COUNTY PROBATE
SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
JUDGE RUDY J, NICHOLS
ROSENBERG,CLI v HERRMANN,SCOT __________ ______________________
<;ourt address Court telephone no.
1200 North Telegraph Road, Pontiac, MI 4834] (248) 858-0582
t:larrje(s), address(es), and telephone no(s). Defendant name(s), address(es). and telephone no(s).
CLINT ROSENBERG and NORTHERN METALS, INC.
,',.<.'
. -, "'.: _.
v SCOTT M. HERRMANN
1440 Boulevard SE
Atlanta, GA 30315
THE HERRMANN LAW FIRM
c/o Scott M. Henman, Registered Agent
1126 Ponce de Leon Avenue, NE
Atlanta GA 30306
I SUMMONS' NO-l"ICE TO THE DEFENDANT: In the name of the people of the State of MiChigan you are noiified:
1. You are
2. YOU HAVE 21
c
lJ1l.YS.afterreceiving this summons to file a written answer with the court and serve a copy on the other party
ortake other lawful action wifu:the court(28 days if you were served by mail oryouwereserved outside this state). MeR2,111 (e)
3. If you do not answer or take other action within the time allowed, judgment may be entered against you for the relief demanded
in the complaint.
IISS'SEp 0 l/?OlO IThi1Jrcns0'3es2010 ICourtclerk RUTH JOHNSON
*Thls summons is invalid unless salVed on or before its expira1ion dale.
This document must be sealed by the seal of the court.
I COMPLAINT I Instruction: The foJ/owing is information thatis required to be in the caption ofeverycompJaint and is to becompJeted
by the plaintiff. Actual allegations and the claim for relief must be stated on additional complaint pages and attached to this fonn.
Family Division Cases
o There is no other pending orresolved action within the jurisdiction olthe family division of circuit court involving the family orfamily
members of the parties.
o An action within the jurisdiction of the family division of the circuit court involving the family or family members of the parties
has been previously filed in Court.
The action 0 remains 0 is no longer pending. The docket number and the judge assigned to the action are:
/Docket no.
Bar no.
General Civil Cases
bZI There is no other pending or resolved civil action arising out ofthe same transaction or occurrence as alleged in the complaint.
o A civil action between these parties or other parties arising out of the transaction or occurrence alleged in the complaint has
been previously filed in Court.
The action 0 remains 0 is no longer pending. The docket number and the judge assigned to the action are:
JDocket no.
Bar no.
VENUE I
Plaintiff(s) residence (include city, township, or village) Defendant(s) residence (include city, township, or village)
Oakland County, Michigan
Fulton County, City of Atlanta, State of Georgia
Place where action arose or business conducted
Oakland Connty, Michigan
1-1-[0
Date SignatuTeOtaomey!piaintiff
If you require special accommodations to use the court because ofa disability or if you require a foreign language interpreter to help
you to fully pariicipate in court proceedings, please contact the court immediatelyto'make'arrangements. " ,-
MC 01 (3/06) SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT MeR 2.102{B){11), MeR 2.104, MeR 2.105. MeR 2.107, MeR 2.113{C){2){a), (b), MeR 3.206{A)
SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
I PROOF OF SERVICE I Case No. 09- - CV
TO PROCESS SERVER: You are to serve the summons and complaint not laterthan 91 days from the dale of filing or the date
of expiration on the orderforsecond summons. You must make and file your return with the court clerk. If you are unable to complete
service you must return this original and all copies to the court clerk.
I CERTlFICATE/AFFIDAVITOFSERVICEIiIIONSERViCE I
o OFFICER CERTIFICATE OR . M AFFIDAVIT OF PROCESS SERVER
I certify that I am a sheriff, deputy sheriff, bailiff, appointed
court officer, oraiiomey for a party [MCR 2.1 04(A)(2)], and
Beind'first duly swom, I state that I am a legally competent
adultwho is not a partyoran officerofa corporate party, and
that: (notarization not required) that: (notarization required)
o I served personaily a copy of the summons and complaint,
o I seived by registered or certified mail (copy of return receipt attached) a copy of the summons and complaint,
__________ ______ ____ ______________________________________ ___
list-:aJI-documents served with the Summons and Complaint
__________________________________________________________________ on the defendant(s):
Defendant's name Complete address(es) of selVice Day, date, time
personally attempted to serve the summons and complaint, togetherwilh any attachments on the following defendanl(s)
and have been unable to complete service.
Defendanfs name Complete addressees) of serAce
6::oH IVI. l-!errmGtIl/\
Service fee Miles traveled Mileage fee Total fee
Signature
$ $ $
Title
Subscribed and sworn to before me on / ?-j ll} I / 0
Date I I
My commission expires: l2-J t?)} LI Signature:
Date'{'\' Q
Notary public, state oUAiehisll, County
U--ct;)l"ij 111 I ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE I
I acknowledge that I have received service of the summons and complaint. together with
Attachments
_________________________________ __ --------------------
Day, date, time
onbehaWw ____________________________________ _
I PROOF OF SERVICE I
SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
Case No. 09- - CV
TO PROCESS SERVER: You are to serve the summons and complaint not later than 91 days from the date offiling orthe date
of expiration on the orderforsecond summons. You must make and file yourretum wiih the court clerk. If you are unable to complete
service you must return this original and all copies to the court clerk.
I CERTIFICATE/AFFIDAVITOFSERVICE/NONSERVICE I
o OFFICER CERTIFICATE OR
I certify that I am a sheriff, deputy sheriff, bailiff, appointed
court officer, oratfomey for a party [MCR 2.1 04(A)(2)], and
that: (notarization not required)
OF PROCESS SERVER
Being first duly sworn, I state that I am a legally competent
adullwho is not a partyoran officerof a corporate party, and
that: (notarization required)
o I served personaily a copy of the summons and complaint,
o I seived by registered or certified mail (copy of return receipt attached) a copy of the summons and complaint,
together with

_______________________________________________________ on the defendant(s):
Defendanfs name Complete addressees} of service Day, date, time
'FI:J I have personally attempted to selVe the summons and complaint, together with any attachments on the following defendant(s)
T)hd have been unable to complete service.
Defendant's name Complete addressees) of service
er rt11Ct n n
Service fee MHes traveled MHeage fee Total fee
$ $ $
Subscribed and sworn to before me on 1;Z/ q IJO /0
Date f '
Day, date, tim:
t
i(j"c-/Il rr;,aCf::} I
1,),/"6' ;;1-0/cJ
,
My commission __ EiigrlatlJre:
Notary public, State of Micll'gan, County
iACKNOWlEDGMENT OF
I acknowledge that I have received service of the summons and complaint, together
Attachments
________________________________ ______ --------
Day, date, time
on behalf of ______________________________ _
z

-:>
.,....
.,....
a
C\I
..l<:
L-
<D
()
4'
c
::J
a
()
""0
C
(I)
..l<:
(I)
o
Q')
c
LL
L-
.8
""0
<D
.2:
<D
t.l
<D
0:::
DJ/DM
Original- Court
Approved, SCAD
1st copy - Plaintiff
Copies - AU other parties
STATE OF MICHIGAN l\
EFAULT REQUEST, AFFIDAVIT,
ENTRY,ANDJUDGMENT
{SUM CERTAIN)
CASE NO.
JUDICIAL DISTRICT
6th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Court address
1200 Telegraph Rd., Pontiac M148341
Plaintiff address, and telephone no.
Clint Rosermerg, et al.
v
10-115349-cz
Defendant name, address, and telephone no.
Scott Herrmann, et al.
Court telephone no.
Plaintiffs attorney. bar no., address, and telephone no.
David Hansma (P71056)
Defendant's attorney, bar no., address, and telephone no.
P.O. Box 55047
1361 E. Big Beaver Rd. Atlanta, GA 30355
Troy, MI 4Mi.\3-
(248) 457"9:110Q-
USE NOTE: Plaintiff must complete the Request and Affidavit and the Default Judgment before filing with the court.
!REQUESTANDAEFIDAVIT!
1. I requestatiefault enlr),-against Scott Herrmann for failure to appear .
2. The claim againstthe defaulted party is fora sum certain orfor a sum, which by computationcan be made certain, and the plaintiff
requests judgment in the-amount of$ 90.000.00 fromthedefaulted party.
-3. The'defaulted party is not an infant orincompetent person .
4. D It is unknown whether the defaulted party is in the military service. 0 The defaulted party is not inthe military service.
D The defaulted party is in the military but there has been notice of pendency olthe action and adequate time and opportuntty
to awearand defend has been provided. Attached, as appropriate, is a waiver of rights and protections provided underthe
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act Faels upon which this conclusion is based are: (specify)
5. This affidavit is made on my personal knowledge and, if sworn as a witness can t in this affidavit.
P71056
Bar no.
\ \ signature
Subscribed and sworn to before me on \ \ Z \ \ U P>(J I=\-rol..D Coun Michi an.
I
Oat'" ( , \\ PRINCESS M. DAVIS
My commission expires: \ t to [? 012-- SIQnature: \ MiF-ic",hig",an
Date \ \ '\ peputy cou c r No
\ .\ \ My CommJssion Expires Dec. 20, 2012
Notary public, State of Michigan, County of ' W -S Acting In the County of QqV
!DEFAULT ENTRY! The default olthe party named above for failure to appear is entered.
JAN 182011 ________________ _
Date Court clerk
By: /s/ D.MAJOR
! DEFAULT JUDGMENT I IT IS ORDERED this judgment is granted in favor of the plaintiff(s) as follows.
*Attach bill of costs if statutory limit is exceeded.
Damages: $ 90,000.00 Costs: $, ____ _
Altorneyfee/other: $, ____ Totaljudgment: $ 90,000.00
This Judgment will earn interest at statutory rates, computed from the filing tlate of the complaint.
Judgment interest accrued thus far is $ and is based on: If needed, attach separate sheet.
D the statutory rate of ___ % from to _______ _
D the statutory 6-month rate(s) of ___ % from to _______ _
JAN 18 2011 ;:;Bu:;,:I,:;:la=,rd::...::.:Jr..:... _________ _
Date Court clerk/Judge
. By: /s/ D.MAIOR
This judgment has been entered and will be final unless, within 21 days of the default-judgment data, a motion to set aside the default is filed.
I CERTIFICATE OF MAILING! I certify that on this date I served a copy ofthis default entry and judgment on the parties ortheir
attorneys by first-class mail addressed to their last-known addresses as defined by MCR 2.107(C)(3).
Date
Signature
Mel 32.517, Mel 600.2441, Mel 600.5759, MeL 600.6013,
MC 01a (3/10) DEFAULT REQUEST, AFFIDAVIT, ENTRY, AND JUDGMENT (SUM CERTAIN) MeR 2.603(B)(2), 50 USC 521
Approved, SCAD
Original - Court
1 sl copy - Plaintiff
Caples - AU other parties
STATE OF MICHIGAN
JUDICIAL DISTRICT
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
DEFAULT REQUEST, AFFIDAVIT,
ENTRY, AND JUDGMENT
(SUMCERTAIN)
CASE NO.
.
6th
COllrt address
1200 Telegraph, Pontiac, MI
Plaintiff nama, address, and telephone no.
Clint Rosenberg, et al.
Plaintiffs attorney, bar no., address, and telephone no .
David Hansma (F71 056)
1361 E. Big Beaver Rd
Troy, MI 48083
(248) 457-9200
v
1 0-115349-cz
Defendanl name, address, and telephone no.
Scott Herrmann, et al.
Court telephone no.
Defendant's attomey, bar no., address, and telephone no,
P.O. Box 550047
Atlanta, GA 30355
USE NOrc:: Plaintiff must complete the Request and AflidaVlI and the Default Judgment before filing With the court .
..-.1 REQUEST AND AFFIDAVIT I
E. 1, I request-a-default entry against Scott Herrmann for failure to appear.
N 2. Theclalm against the defaulted party is for a sum certain orfora sum, which by computation can be made certain, and the plaintiff
.;.:: requests judgment in the amount of $ 90.000.00 from Ihedefaultedparty.
t- 3. The defaulted party Is not an infant or incompetent person,
CD 4. [J It is unknown whether Ihe defaulted party is in the military service. 121 The defaulted party is not in the military service.
0, 0 The defaulted party is In the military but there has been notice of pendency of the action and adequate lime and opportunity
to appear and defend has been provided, Attached, as appropriate, is awaiverofrights and protections provided under the
C SeIVicemembers Civil Relief Act. Facts upon which this conclusion is based are: {specify}
g 5. This affidavit is made on my personal knOWledge and, if sworn as a to the facts in this affidavit.
'" P71056
'0 / AppJ!canUAttorney Signature Bar no.
iii Subscribed and sworn to before me on I /$ / cO I I "."fl::. (/----'::::.... ___ Counly, Michigan.
32 Oar, (_ -, z:> . '\J01J
C1l My commission expires: I?-! blo ( ao 19. Signature: -It} i A ,[ ,}
o Dale Deputy court
2? Notary public, State of Michigan, County of _________ _
PRINCESS M. DAVIS
blotary public, State of Michigan
County of Wayne
'u:- "j.DEFAULTENTRYI
JAN 132011 L..
The default of the party named above for failure to appear is entered.
Bill Buliard ,)r
My Commission ExplrBJ\ Dec. 20,20.12
Ac\!ng In IIll} County of UQ It l)4 tu.D
Dare
Courtcle,k By: lsi S.WAGNER .2
ill I DEFAULT JUDGMENT I IT IS ORDERED this judgment is granted in favor of the plaintiff(s) as follows .
. 'Attach bill of costs If statutory limit is exceeded,
Damages: $ Costs: $,_____ Attorneyfee/Other: $ ____ Total judgment: $=======
Q) This judgment will earn Interest at statutory rates, computed from the filing' dale of the complaint.
0:::_, ... interest accrued thus far is $ and is based on: If needed, attach separate shee!.
o the stalutory rate of ___ % from 10 _______ _
o the statutory 6-month rate(s) of ___ % from to _______ _
JAN 132011
Date
Bill Bullard Jr
Courtcl"I<_ By: lsi S.WAGNER
This Judgment has been entered and will be final unless, within 21 days of the default Judgment date, a motion \0 set aside the default Is filed.
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I certify that on this date I served a copy of this default entry and judgment on the parties or their
attorneys by first-class ma I addressed to their last-known addresses as defined by MCR 2, 1 07(C)(3).
Dala
Signatute
MCl 32.517, MeL 600.2441, Mel 600.5759, Mel 600.60'13,
Me 07a (3/10) DEFAULT REQUEST, AFFIDAVIT, ENTRY, AND JUDGMENT (SUM CERTAIN) MeR 2.603(B)(2). 50 USC 521
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing on all
parties to these proceedings or their counsel by depositing same in the United
States mail with sufficient postage attached thereon addressed to the following:
Mr. Scott Michael Herrmann
P. O. Box 550047
Atlanta, GA 30355
~
This ~ day of November, 2011.
STATE BAR OF GEORGIA
Office ofthe General Counsel
104 Marietta Street, NW
Suite 100
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
(404) 527-8720
Jenp K. Mittelman
De ty General Counsel
State Bar No. 513828