Case: 11-15331

Date (1 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012

Page: 1 of 79

NO. 11-15331-C IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee. vs. JOEL ESQUENAZI Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida BRIEF OF APPELLANT

Michael J. Rosen (FL Bar #183719) MICHAEL J. ROSEN, P.A. 2937 SW 27th Avenue, Suite 101 Miami, Florida 33133 Tel: 305-446-6116 Email: mjr@mjrosenlaw.com

Michael A. Sink (CO Bar #36064) T. Markus Funk (CO Bar #43500) PERKINS COIE LLP 1900 Sixteenth Street, Suite 1400 Denver, CO 80202 Tel: 303-291-2300 Email: msink@perkinscoie.com mfunk@perkinscoie.com

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT JOEL ESQUENAZI

Case: 11-15331

Date (2 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012

Page: 2 of 79

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page STANDARDS OF REVIEW....................................................................................4 A. B. C. D. Failure to Conduct a Hearing to Address Possible Issues Under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963) ...................4 Statutory Construction and Sufficiency of the Evidence...........4 Jury Instructions.........................................................................5 Sentencing Standards - Aggravating Role, Obstruction of Justice or Perjury, and Loss Amount .........................................5

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ............................6 STATEMENT OF THE CASE.................................................................................6 STATEMENT OF FACTS .....................................................................................13 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT .....................................................................18 ARGUMENT ..........................................................................................................20 I. THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED WHEN IT REFUSED TO CONDUCT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON BRADY ISSUES...............................................................................................20 ESQUENAZI IS ENTITLED TO AN ACQUITTAL BECAUSE EMPLOYEES OF HAITI TELECO WERE NOT DIRECTED FOREIGN OFFICIALS WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE FCPA SIMPLY BECAUSE THE NATIONAL BANK OF HAITI OWNED SHARES OF HAITI TELECO AND THE HAITIAN GOVERNMENT APPOINTED BOARD MEMBERS AND DIRECTORS .................25 A. The FCPA Must Be Construed to Exclude Payments Made to State-Owned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions............................................27 1. The Statutory Context of the FCPA Indicates that Instrumentality Must Be Construed to Exclude Both State-Owned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions and Employees of the Same .................................................30

II.

Case: 11-15331

Date (3 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012

Page: 3 of 79

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page 2. In the Alternative, the FCPAs Definition of Foreign Official Is Ambiguous, and Should Be Construed to Exclude State-Owned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions........................................................................35 a. Legislative History Supports Construing the FCPA to Exclude State-Owned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions. . .................................35 The Use of the Term Instrumentality in Other Statutes Supports Construing the FCPA to Exclude State-Owned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions. . .................................37 The Rule of Lenity Requires the Court to Construe the FCPA to Exclude StateOwned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions. ....................40

b.

c.

3. B.

In the Alternative, the FCPA Is Unconstitutionally Vague as Applied to Esquenazi .....................................41

The Government Failed to Present Any Evidence that Haiti Teleco Performed a Governmental Function Similar to that Performed by Political Subdivisions Like a Department or Agency .............................................................45 Esquenazi Is Also Entitled to Acquittal on the Money Laundering and Wire Transfer Counts Because They Were Predicated on Unproven FCPA Violations ....................48

C.

III.

THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS ON THE FCPA DID NOT ADEQUATELY CONVEY THE REQUISITE GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTION NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH THAT HAITI TELECO WAS AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE HAITIAN GOVERNMENT OR ESQUENAZIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE SAME ........................................................................................51

ii

Case: 11-15331

Date (4 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012

Page: 4 of 79

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page IV. THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED BY IMPROPERLY APPLYING THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES AS TO LEADERSHIP ROLE, PERJURY AND LOSS AMOUNT .............55 A. B. C. Esquenazi Did Not Exercise a Leadership Role ......................55 Esquenazi Did Not Obstruct Justice or Commit Perjury .........59 The Amount of Loss Should Have Been Measured by the Personal Benefit to Esquenazi, Not Terra................................62

CONCLUSION.......................................................................................................64

iii

Case: 11-15331

Date (5 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012

Page: 5 of 79

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Arthur Anderson LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 (2005)............................................................................................51 Bogle v. McClure, 332 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2003) ............................................................................5 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)..................................................................................... passim Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank, 511 U.S. 164 (1994)............................................................................................39 Connally v. Gen. Constr. Co., 269 U.S. 385 (1926)............................................................................................41 Deal v. United States, 508 U.S. 129 (1993)............................................................................................35 Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson, 538 U.S. 468 (2003)............................................................................................39 Edison v. Douberly, 604 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2010) ..........................................................................38 Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1441 (2012)........................................................................................28 Garcia v. United States, 469 U.S. 70 (1984)..............................................................................................35 Hall v. American National Red Cross, 86 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 1996) ................................................................................32 In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated August 9, 2000, 218 F. Supp. 2d 544 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) ................................................................32 Kelley v. Secy for Dept of Corrs., 377 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2004) ..........................................................................21

iv

Case: 11-15331

Date (6 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012

Page: 6 of 79

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983)............................................................................................41 Koval v. Washington County Redevelopment Authority, 574 F.3d 238 (3d Cir. 2009) ...............................................................................38 Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995)............................................................................................21 Lamb v. Phillip Morris, Inc., 915 F.2d 1024 (6th Cir. 1990) ............................................................................25 Leocal v. Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1 (2004)................................................................................................30 Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden, 503 U.S. 318 (1992)............................................................................................28 Nixon v. Missouri Municipal League, 541 U.S. 125 (2004)............................................................................................33 Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Train Dispatchers, 499 U.S. 117 (1991)............................................................................................31 Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987)..............................................................................................21 Reno v. Koray, 515 U.S. 50 (1995)..............................................................................................40 Robinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337 (1997)............................................................................................37 Rose v. Long Island R.R. Pension Plan, 828 F.2d 910 (2d Cir. 1987) ...............................................................................38 Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 514 (1923)............................................................................................29 Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 1885 (2011)........................................................................................28 v

Case: 11-15331

Date (7 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012

Page: 7 of 79

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page Skilling v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2896 (2010)........................................................................................44 Small v. United States, 544 U.S. 385 (2005)............................................................................................29 Stano v. Dugger, 901 F.2d 898 (11th Cir. 1990) ............................................................................22 Stewart v. Dutra Constr. Co. 543 U.S. 481 (2005)............................................................................................28 Strickler v. Greene, 527 U.S. 263 (1999)............................................................................................21 Territory of Alaska v. American Can Company, 358 U.S. 224 (1959)............................................................................................36 United States v. Aguilar, No. 2:10-CR-1031(A) .........................................................................................10 United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976)..............................................................................................21 United States v. American Trucking Assns., Inc., 310 U.S. 534 (1940)............................................................................................33 United States v. Anderson, 517 F.3d 953 (7th Cir. 2008) ..............................................................................62 United States v. Antone, 603 F.2d 566 (5th Cir. 1979) ..............................................................................25 United States v. Arbolaez, 450 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2006) ............................................................................4 United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985)............................................................................................21 United States v. Biro, 143 F.3d 1421 (11th Cir. 1998) ..........................................................................42 vi

Case: 11-15331

Date (8 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012

Page: 8 of 79

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page United States v. Blondek, 741 F. Supp. 116 (N.D. Tex. 1990) ....................................................................32 United States v. Bodmer, 342 F. Supp. 2d 176 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) ......................................................... 35, 40 United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2003)............................................................................................55 United States v. Brown, 459 F.3d 509 (5th Cir. 2006) ..............................................................................41 United States v. Brown, 944 F.2d 1377 (7th Cir. 1991) ..................................................................... 57, 59 United States v. Campa, 529 F.3d 980 (11th Cir. 2008) ..............................................................................4 United States v. Carson, No. SA CR 09-00077-JVS, 2011 WL 5101701 (C.D. Cal. May 18, 2011) 27, 36 United States v. Castro, 455 F.3d 1249 (11th Cir. 2006) ............................................................................4 United States v. Cohen, 171 F.3d 796 (3d Cir. 1999) ...............................................................................63 United States v. Daniels, 148 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 1998) ............................................................................6 United States v. De La Rosa, 922 F.2d 675 (11th Cir. 1991) ..............................................................................5 United States v. DeGovanni, 104 F.3d 43 (3d Cir. 1997) .................................................................................56 United States v. DeVegter, 439 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 2006) ..........................................................................63 United States v. Dunnigan, 507 U.S. 87 (1993)..............................................................................................60 vii

Case: 11-15331

Date (9 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012

Page: 9 of 79

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page United States v. Espinosa-Hernandez, 918 F.2d 911 (11th Cir. 1990) ............................................................................22 United States v. Fernandez, 136 F.3d 1434 (11th Cir. 1998) ..........................................................................22 United States v. Galardi, 476 F.2d 1072 (9th Cir. 1973) ............................................................................50 United States v. Geffard, 87 F.3d 448 (11th Cir. 1996) ..............................................................................60 United States v. Gonzalez, 940 F.2d 1413 (11th Cir. 1991) ..........................................................................54 United States v. Granderson, 511 U.S. 39 (1994)..............................................................................................40 United States v. Gregg, 179 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 1999) ..................................................................... 5, 60 United States v. Grigsby, 111 F.3d 806 (11th Cir. 1997) ..............................................................................5 United States v. Izydore, 167 F.3d 213 (5th Cir. 1999) ..............................................................................49 United States v. Jefferson No. 1:08-CR-209 (E.D. Va. July 30, 2009) ........................................................10 United States v. Jennings, 599 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir. 2010) ..........................................................................59 United States v. Jensen, 532 F. Supp. 2d 1187 (N.D. Cal. 2008)..............................................................36 United States v. Kapordelis, 569 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) ............................................................................4 United States v. Kay, 359 F.3d 738 (5th Cir. 2004) ..............................................................................27 viii

Case: 11-15331

Date (10 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 10 of 79

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page United States v. Kay, 513 F.3d 432 (5th Cir. 2007) ..............................................................................42 United States v. Keene, 470 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2011) ..........................................................................55 United States v. Kirland, 985 F.2d 535 (11th Cir. 1993) ..............................................................................5 United States v. Kozeny, 582 F. Supp. 2d 535 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) ................................................................35 United States v. Landers, 68 F.3d 882 (5th Cir. 1995) ................................................................................63 United States v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259 (1997)..................................................................................... 40, 42 United States v. McNab, 331 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2003) ..........................................................................23 United States v. Nam Quoc Nguyen, et al, 08-CR-522.............................................................................................................8 United States v. Nosal, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 1176119 (9th Cir. April 10, 2012) .................................44 United States v. Nosrati-Shamloo, 255 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 2001) ............................................................................6 United States v. Orleans, 425 U.S. 807 (1976)............................................................................................38 United States v. Pringle, 350 F.3d 1172 (11th Cir. 2003) ..........................................................................35 United States v. Robertson, 493 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2007) ..........................................................................49 United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507 (2008)..................................................................................... 28, 40 ix

Case: 11-15331

Date (11 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 11 of 79

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page United States v. Shabani, 513 U.S. 10 (1994)..............................................................................................40 United States v. Stevens, 130 S. Ct. 1577 (2010)........................................................................................31 United States v. Suarez, 313 F.3d 1287 (11th Cir. 2002) ..........................................................................56 United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008)..................................................................................... 31, 40 United States v. Yates, 990 F.2d 1179 (11th Cir. 1993) ................................................................... 56, 57 United States v. Ziglin, 964 F.2d 756 (8th Cir. 1992) ..............................................................................63 United States v. Zimmer, 299 F.3d 710 (8th Cir. 2002) ..............................................................................56 United v. Goyal, 629 F.3d 912, (9th Cir. 2011) .............................................................................44 Unites States v. Martinez 584 F.3d 1022 (11th Cir. 2009) ..........................................................................56 Ward v. Hall, 592 F.3d 1144 (11th Cir. 2010) ..........................................................................21 Whitfield v. United States, 543 U.S. 209 (2005)............................................................................................39 Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. 193 (1992)............................................................................................55 U.S. CONSTITUTION Amend. IV, ..............................................................................................................39 Amend. V, Due Process Clause ...............................................................................39 x

Case: 11-15331

Date (12 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 12 of 79

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page STATUTES AND GUIDELINES 1 U.S.C. 1-6...........................................................................................................28 15 U.S.C. 78m(q)(1)(B) ........................................................................................39 15 U.S.C. 78dd-2........................................................................................... passim 18 U.S.C. 1343......................................................................................................63 18 U.S.C. 1621(1) .................................................................................................60 18 U.S.C. 1956..................................................................................... 6, 11, 48, 50 18 U.S.C. 2 ..............................................................................................................6 18 U.S.C. 371................................................................................................... 6, 48 18 U.S.C. 3742........................................................................................................3 18 U.S.C. 112........................................................................................................32 18 U.S.C. 1116......................................................................................................32 18 U.S.C. 1956(h) .................................................................................................50 28 U.S.C. 1002(32) ...............................................................................................38 28 U.S.C. 1291........................................................................................................3 28 U.S.C. 1603(b) .................................................................................................39 28 U.S.C. 2671......................................................................................................34 28 U.S.C. 1346(b) .................................................................................................38 42 U.S.C. 12131(1) ...............................................................................................38 U.S.S.G 2C1.1................................................................................................... 62, 64 U.S.S.G. 3C1.1.........................................................................................................59

xi

Case: 11-15331

Date (13 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 13 of 79

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page OTHER AUTHORITIES Blacks Law Dictionary .................................................................................... 28, 50 Websters New World College Dictionary (4th ed. 2002) ......................................28 American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: New College Edition....28 John Ashcroft & John Ratcliffe, The Recent and Unusual Evolution of an Expanding FCPA, 26 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Poly 25 (2012) 1 .. 19, 44 Mike Koehler, The Faade of FCPA Enforcement, 41 Geo. J. Intl L. 907, 927 (2010) ............................................................. 19, 43 James R. Doty, Toward a Reg. FCPA: A Modest Proposal for Change in Administering the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 62 Bus. Law. 1233, 1238-39 (2007) ..................................................................43

xii

Case: 11-15331

Date (14 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 14 of 79

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT The Appellant, Joel Esquenazi, through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to 11th Circuit Rule 26.1-1, hereby submit the following list of all trial judge(s), all attorneys, persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have an interest in the outcome of this appeal, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates and parent corporations, including any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of the partys stock, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party: Anderson, Rhonda Anne, trial counsel for Appellant Carlos Rodriguez; Cirincione, James F., counsel for Appellant Carlos Rodriguez; Diaz, Richard John, trial counsel for Appellant Joel Esquenazi; Esquenazi, Joel, Appellant; Fagan, Aurora, counsel for Appellee; Ferrer, Wilfredo A., counsel for Appellee; Funk, T. Markus, counsel for Appellant Joel Esquenazi; Gerrity, Kevin B., counsel for Appellee; Grove, Daren, counsel for Appellee; Halfenger, G. Michael, counsel for Appellant Carlos Rodriguez; Hernandez, Arturo V., trial counsel for Appellant Carlos Rodriguez; Johnston, Pamela L., counsel for Appellant Carlos Rodriguez; Koukios, James M., counsel for Appellee; 1

Case: 11-15331

Date (15 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 15 of 79

Martinez, Hon. Jose E., Trial Judge; Mrazek, Nicola J., counsel for Appellee; Republic of Haiti, victim; Rodriguez, Carlos, Appellant; Rosen, Michael James, counsel for Appellant Joel Esquenazi; Schultz, Anne R., counsel for Appellee; Simon, David W., counsel for Appellant Carlos Rodriguez; Sink, Michael A., counsel for Appellant Joel Esquenazi; Telecommunications DHaiti, victim; and Valiente, Lauren L., counsel for Appellant Carlos Rodrguez.

Case: 11-15331

Date (16 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 16 of 79

STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT Appellant Joel Esquenazi requests oral argument. This case involves complex legal and factual issues, and the Esquenazi believes that oral argument will assist the Court in resolving those issues. STATEMENT REGARDING ADOPTION OF BRIEFS OF OTHER PARTIES Appellant Joel Esquenazi hereby adopts those portions of Co-appellant Carlos Rodriguezs brief relating to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), 15 U.S.C. 78dd-2(a)(1)-(2), intra-state wire fraud issues, and the Haitian bribery counts. STATEMENT OF SUBJECT-MATTER AND APPELLATE JURISDICTION The district court entered judgment on October 26, 2011, and an amended judgment on November 3, 2011. On November 7, 2011, Esquenazi filed a timely notice of appeal. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291 and 18 U.S.C. 3742. STATEMENT REGARDING INCARCERATION Esquenazi is currently incarcerated at the Fort Dix Federal Correctional Institution and serving a sentence of 180 months imprisonment.

Case: 11-15331

Date (17 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 17 of 79

STANDARDS OF REVIEW A. Failure to Conduct a Hearing to Address Possible Issues Under

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963). Generally, a district courts refusal to hold an evidentiary hearing is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Kapordelis, 569 F.3d 1291, 1308 (11th Cir. 2009). In some cases, however, courts of appeals review de novo a refusal to hold evidentiary hearings involving constitutional issues. See, e.g., United States v. Arbolaez, 450 F.3d 1283, 1293 n.11 (11th Cir. 2006) (discussing various standards applicable to Fourth Amendment hearings pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978)). Because Brady addresses Due Process rights under the Fifth Amendment, this Court should review de novo the district courts refusal to grant an evidentiary hearing. B. Statutory Construction and Sufficiency of the Evidence. This

Court reviews de novo a district courts construction of the statutory elements of a criminal offense. See United States v. Castro, 455 F.3d 1249, 1251 (11th Cir. 2006). This Court also reviews the sufficiency of the evidence de novo and view[s] the evidence in the light most favorable to the government with all reasonable inferences and credibility choices made in favor of the government to determine whether a reasonable jury could convict. United States v. Campa, 529 F.3d 980, 992 (11th Cir. 2008). 4

Case: 11-15331

Date (18 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 18 of 79

C.

Jury Instructions. Jury instructions are reviewed to determine

whether they misstate the law or mislead the jury to the prejudice of the party who objects to them. United States v. Grigsby, 111 F.3d 806, 814 (11th Cir. 1997). Provided the instructions accurately reflect the law, the district court enjoys wide discretion as to the style and wording employed in its instruction[s]. Bogle v. McClure, 332 F.3d 1347, 1356 (11th Cir. 2003). D. Sentencing Standards - Aggravating Role, Obstruction of Justice

or Perjury, and Loss Amount. The government has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence the existence of the aggravating role. United States v. De La Rosa, 922 F.2d 675, 680 (11th Cir. 1991). A district courts determination as to a defendants role in the offense is a finding of fact subject to a clearly erroneous standard of review. Whether a particular provision of the guidelines applies to a given set of facts, on the other hand, is a question of law reviewed de novo. United States v. Kirland, 985 F.2d 535, 537 (11th Cir. 1993). This Court reviews for clear error a district courts findings in support of an obstruction of justice offense level enhancement based on perjury, according great deference to the district courts credibility determinations. See United States v. Gregg, 179 F.3d 1312, 1316 (11th Cir. 1999). A district courts determination regarding the amount of loss for sentencing purposes is reviewed for clear error.

Case: 11-15331

Date (19 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 19 of 79

See United States v. Nosrati-Shamloo, 255 F.3d 1290, 1291 (11th Cir. 2001); United States v. Daniels, 148 F.3d 1260, 1261 (11th Cir. 1998). STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the district court erred by refusing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on Brady issues. Whether Esquenazi is entitled to an acquittal because employees of Haiti Teleco were not foreign officials within the meaning of FCPA simply because the National Bank of Haiti owned shares of Haiti Teleco and the Haitian government appoint board members and directors. Whether the FCPA jury instructions adequately conveyed the requisite governmental function necessary to establish that Haiti Teleco was an instrumentality of the Haitian government and Esquenazis knowledge of the same. Whether the district court erred by improperly applying the sentencing guidelines as to leadership role, perjury and loss amount. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Joel Esquenazi was indicted on twenty-one counts of conspiracy to commit violations of the FCPA and wire fraud (Count 1), violating the FCPA (Counts 2-8), conspiracy to commit money laundering (Count 9), and money laundering (Counts 10-21), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371, 15 U.S.C. 78dd-2(a), 18 U.S.C. 2, 18 U.S.C. 1956(h), and 18 U.S.C. 1956(a)(1)(B)(i), respectively.1 The indictment alleged that between 2001 and 2004, Esquenazi and Carlos Rodriguez, co-owners and executives of Terra Telecommunications Company

Dkt. 3.

Case: 11-15331

Date (20 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 20 of 79

(Terra), a Miami-based telecommunications company, used various consultants2 to pay kick-backs to two employees, Robert Antoine and Jean Rene Duperval, of the Haitian telecommunications company, Telecommunications DHaiti S.A. (Haiti Teleco), in exchange for reduced international telecommunications rates and unearned credits.3 The original indictment also named Antoine, Duperval, and Marguerite Grandison as co-defendants. Antoine pled guilty.4 Duperval and Grandisons trial was later severed from Esquenazi and Rodriguezs.5 The Governments FCPA theory throughout the case was that Antoine and Duperval were foreign officials under the FCPA simply because Haiti Telco was partially owned and purportedly controlled by the Republic of Haiti.6 Esquenazi moved to dismiss the indictment for failure to state a criminal offense and for vagueness, arguing that 1) Antoine and Duperval were not foreign officials; 2) Haiti Teleco was not an instrumentality of Haiti; and 3) the FCPAs language including any department, agency, or instrumentality in the definition of foreign official is unconstitutionally vague.7 In its response to Esquenazis
2 3 4 5 6 7

Dkt. 3 at 4-6, 10-12, 14. Dkt. 3 at 7-8, 3. Dkt. 132. Dkt. 419, 421, 439. Dkt. 3 at 2-3, 5, 3-4, 13. Dkt. 283.

Case: 11-15331

Date (21 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 21 of 79

motion to dismiss the indictment, the Government blithely asserted, without meaningful legal support or contextual analysis, that the FCPAs current interpretation by courts, its legislative history, and U.S. treaty obligations provide no support for the defendants novel and confusing definition.8 The Governments primary argument was that the Defendants arguments were a premature request for a ruling on the sufficiency of the governments evidence or were premature arguments for jury instructions.9 The Government asserted that it stood prepared to brief and argue this issue again, should the defendants raise it, upon a Rule 29 motion or in the context of formulating jury instructions.10 In its three page order denying Esquenazis motion to dismiss, the district court characterized Esquenazis motion as discuss[ing] a number of factual issues, and asserted that the Government has sufficiently alleged that Antoine and Duperval were foreign officials by alleging that these individuals were directors in the state-owned Haiti Teleco.11 It also disagreed that Haiti Teleco cannot be an instrumentality under the FCPAs definition of foreign official Dkt. 294 at 9. In two footnotes, the Government cited to United States v. Nam Quoc Nguyen, et al, 08-CR-522, Dkt. 110, which summarily rejected without written opinion a similar motion to dismiss an FCPA indictment, which included a void for vagueness challenge. Id. at 8, fn. 2 & 9, fn. 3.
9 8

Id. at 1 & 9. Id. at 9. Dkt. 309 at 2, 3.

10 11

Case: 11-15331

Date (22 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 22 of 79

because the plain language of this statute and the plain meaning of this term show that as the facts are alleged in the indictment Haiti Teleco could be an instrumentality of the Haitian government, but offered no analysis of the statutory language or explanation as to why the Governments ipse dixit interpretation was consistent with the plain meaning of the statute.12 At the jury instruction stage, Esquenazi again requested jury instructions that defined instrumentality in light of the statutory context of the FCPA.13 Seemingly oblivious to its own prior arguments, the Government now accused Esquenazi of proposing a jury instruction directly contradict[ing] the district courts ruling on the motion to dismiss, and ignor[ing] the district courts finding that state-owned enterprises can be government instrumentalities under the plain meaning of the statute, a ruling echoed since by two separate courts in the Central District of California.14 Once again, the Government offered no legal authority construing the statute or contextual analysis of the actual language in support of its interpretation. Instead it continued to bootstrap its position, claiming in essence that 1) the Government is permitted to construe the statute broadly; 2) it has done so in the past with little judicial comment; and 3) some other district courts have
12 13 14

Id. at 3. Dkt. 403; Dkt. 404; Dkt. 405. Dkt. 409 at 1, 3.

Case: 11-15331

Date (23 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 23 of 79

allowed the Governments position.15 Again, the district court adopted the Governments position regarding instrumentality with little statutory analysis or explanation.16 On August 4, 2011, Esquenazi was convicted by a jury on all twenty-one counts of the indictment.17 No later than August 9, 2011, the Government received a declaration from Jean Max Bellerive, the Prime Minister of Haiti. The Prime Ministers declaration, dated July 26, 2011 ten days before the jury reached its verdict - asserted that: The law of September 16, 1963 grants the Haitian State or any other State body to acquire shares in Limited Companies. Once the State becomes a shareholder it must obtain a change in the bylaws to change the Limited Company (S.A.) to Limited Mixed Company (S.A.M.). This change is essential to allow the State to appoint its representatives to the Board of Directors. As far as [Haiti Teleco] is concerned, the company never underwent legal change and kept its old bylaws of Limited Company. . . . Based on the foregoing, [Haiti Teleco] has

See, e.g., Dkt. 409 at 2 (proposed instructions were based on and similar to the instruction on foreign official given in United States v. Jefferson and United States v. Aguilar, both FCPA cases that went to trial and concerned state-owned and state-controlled entities). Dkt. 320; see also Dkt. 409 at 2-4 (discussing prior decisions of district courts in United States v. Jefferson, No. 1:08-CR-209, Dkt. 684 at 75-87 (E.D. Va. July 30, 2009), and United States v. Aguilar, No. 2:10-CR-1031(A), Dkt. 511 at 35 (C.D. Cal. May 16, 2011), substantially adopting the Governments jury instructions, but not analyzing the text of the FCPA).
17 16

15

Dkt. 522.

10

Case: 11-15331

Date (24 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 24 of 79

never been and is not a State enterprise. Since its formation to date, it has and remains a Company under common law.18 The Government provided the document to defense counsel on August 10, 2011. Around August 25, 2011, Prime Minister Bellerive provided a second declaration, which in the words of the Government the Government assisted Mr. Bellerive in preparing.19 In the second declaration, he asserted that he: [D]id not know that [his prior declaration] was going to be used in criminal legal proceedings in the United States or that it was going to be used in support of the argument that, after the takeover by BRH [Bank of the Republic of Haiti] and before its modernization, [Haiti Teleco] was not part of the Public Administration of Haiti. This is obviously not the case since, during that time, [Haiti Teleco] belonged to BRH, which is an institution of the Haitian state. That document had been signed strictly for internal purposes and to be used in support of the on-going modernization process of [Haiti Teleco].20 Mr. Bellerive, however, confirmed the facts in his first declaration were correct, reiterating that between 1968 and the partial modernization of Haiti Telco in 2001, no Haitian law ever established [Haiti Teleco] as a publicly-owned institution.21 On August 25, 2011, Esquenazi joined Rodriguezs motion for a judgment of acquittal or new trial, noting that the Government had failed to prove the elements of an FCPA violation, the jury instruction regarding an instrumentality

18 19 20 21

Dkt. 581-1 at 4 (emphasis added). Dkt. 561 at 10. Dkt. 581-2 at 3, 2; Dkt. 561, at 10. Dkt. 581-2 at 3, 5 (emphasis added).

11

Case: 11-15331

Date (25 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 25 of 79

under the FCPA was in error, and the Prime Ministers competing declarations were new evidence warranting a new trial.22 The district court denied the motion on October 14, 2011, asserting that the jury instructions properly defined an instrumentality under the FCPA through a non-exclusive multi-factor definition, and that the Prime Ministers July 26, 2011 declaration provides no newly discovered evidence and would not have affected the jury verdict.23 For sentencing, the probation office calculated a total offense level of 40 in its Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSIR). Esquenazi objected to the PSIRs enhancements.24 On October 22, 2011, Esquenazi filed a Motion for Variance/Downward Departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, which the district court granted.25 On October 25, 2011, Esquenazi was sentenced to 180 months imprisonment, three years of supervised release, $2,200,000 in restitution and a $2,100 special assessment. More specifically, the district court sentenced Esquenazi to a term of sixty months on Counts 1 through 8 and consecutive one hundred twenty months on Counts 9 through 21.26

22 23 24 25 26

Dkt. 542, 543, 546, 547, 586. Dkt. 609 at 10, 13, 23. Dkt. 565; Dkt. 603. Dkt. 620; Dkt. 646 at 67. Dkt. 629; Dkt. 646.

12

Case: 11-15331

Date (26 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 26 of 79

STATEMENT OF FACTS A. Terras Relationship with Haiti Teleco

In 1997, Esquenazi and Rodriguez formed Terra to provide telecommunications services in various countries throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. Terra was a leading company in the marketing of prepaid phone cards and wholesale minutes.27 As part of its business operations, Terra used upwards of ten consultants familiar with various countries to assist it in doing business with those countries in conformance with their laws.28 In 2000, Haiti World Access International, Inc. (Haiti World Access) approached Terra about forming a joint venture to do business with Haiti Teleco.29 The parties executed a joint venture agreement.30 The contract required Terra to invest substantial resources, including expenditures for infrastructure in Haiti. In May of 2001, Esquenazi flew to Haiti to meet with Patrick Joseph, Haiti Telecos Director General. The meeting took place after Joseph voiced concerns over Haiti World Accesss failure to pay its invoices totaling over $400,000.31 During the visit, Joseph decided to terminate Haiti World Accesss contract and
27 28 29 30 31

Dkt. 504 at 38; Dkt. 509 at 56-57, 61. Dkt. 491 at 4-5, 53; Dkt. 55 at 20. Dkt. 491 at 55; Dkt. 508 at 71; Dkt. 704, Joint Ex. A & Ex. 209. Dkt. 704, Joint Ex. A; Dkt. 508 at 72. Dkt. 504 at 128-129.

13

Case: 11-15331

Date (27 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 27 of 79

from that point forward deal exclusively with Terra.32 Haiti Teleco and Terra entered into a contract on May 30, 2001.33 The contract required additional investments from Terra, but switched the nature of the relationship from a perminute rate basis to a joint venture arrangement with Haiti Teleco. In some cases, equipment purchased and installed in Haiti by Terra was to be compensated for by credits being applied to Terras account. Upon return to Miami, Terra terminated its joint venture with Haiti World Access.34 Based on his conversation with Joseph, Esquenazi believed Terras relationship with Haiti Teleco would be unencumbered by debts from Haiti World Access.35 Over time, Haiti Teleco grew to be approximately twenty to twenty-five percent of Terras overall business.36 B. Billing Disputes and Payments

A few months after executing the new joint venture agreement, Antoine joined Haiti Teleco as the Director of International Affairs. Antoine was responsible for administering Haiti Telecos relationships with foreign carriers like Terra.37 Despite the new agreement, Antoine on Haiti Telecos behalf continued to
32 33 34 35 36 37

Id. Id.; Dkt. 704, Ex. 210. Dkt. 491 at 56-57; Dkt. 504 at 130. Dkt. 504 at 132. Dkt. 504 at 46. Dkt. 702-1 at 15-16.

14

Case: 11-15331

Date (28 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 28 of 79

bill on a per-minute basis, issued invoices to Terra based on amounts previously owed by Haiti World Access, and failed to account for the credits to which Terra was entitled.38 Terra disputed the charges and credits, but to little avail.39 Eventually, Terra filed a complaint with Conatel, the Haitian communications commission.40 Simultaneously, because Terra earned money from customers, at Haiti Telecos request, it issued disbursements to third-parties, including a law firm representing Haiti Teleco and two consulting companies - J.D. Locator, owned by Juan Diaz, and A&G Distributors, owned by Alix Pradel - with whom Terra had written agreements.41 Antoine, after he was indicted and pled guilty, reached an agreement with the Government, and now claimed that the consulting agreements with J.D. Locator and A&G Distributors were a sham, and that the payments were part of an explicit agreement between him and Esquenazi to pay Antoine 50% of the amount by which he reduced the invoices.42 In other words, according to Antoine, Terra gave him a 50% kick-back on all invoice reductions or credits. Between 2001 and 2004, according to Antoine, Terra would at his direction pay intermediaries such as
38 39 40 41 42

Dkt. 493 at 23-24; Ex. 189; Dkt. 704, Ex. H; Dkt. 702-1 at 71-72. Dkt. 508 at 83-85. Dkt. 702-1 at 39-45; Dkt. 704, Ex. 301. Dkt. 702-1 at 33-36, 44, 49; Dkt. 491 at 75-84; Dkt. 800 at 81, 94.

15

Case: 11-15331

Date (29 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 29 of 79

J.D. Locator and A & G Distributors, who would in turn forward the money on to Antoine, who would share the money with Diaz and Pradel. Antoine and Jean Fourcand, who ran a deli in Miami, also claimed that Terra agreed to provide calling cards free of charge to Fourcand though Terra issued invoices for them.43 Antoine was replaced by Duperval in August 2003.44 On November 18, 2003, Terra and Telecom Consulting Services Corporation (TCSC) executed a commission agreement under which Terra would pay TCSC for its help obtaining a contract with Haiti Teleco.45 Pursuant to the agreement, Terra made payments to TCSC.46 Grandison, who owned TCSC and was Dupervals sister, made 23 payments to Duperval and his wife.47 According to the Government, these payments were made to lower Terras invoices and per-minute rates.48 C. Haiti Telecos History and Legal Status

Government witness Gary Lissade testified that Haiti Teleco was started in 1968 as private company.49 As part of the original contract with the Republic of

43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Dkt. 482 at 55; Dkt. 800 at 113; Dkt. 704, Ex. 117. Dkt. 496 at 6. Dkt. 503 at 12; Dkt. 703 at 51-56; Dkt. 703-1 at 62; Dkt. 704, Ex. 73. Dkt. 503 at 12; Dkt. 704, Exs. 700F, 700H. Id. Dkt. 503 at 13, 25-28; Dkt. 704, Ex. 601. Dkt. 493 at 39, 66.

16

Case: 11-15331

Date (30 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 30 of 79

Haiti, the Haitian government had the right to appoint at least two board members to Haiti Teleco, but no board members were appointed by the Haitian government at that time. Around 1971-1972, the Bank of the Republic of Haiti purchased 97% of Haiti Teleco, although no law marked the change in ownership. The Bank of the Republic of Haiti is Haitis central bank. At no time, however, was Haiti Telecos business status changed from S.A. - indicating a privately held limited company - to S.A.M. - indicating a limited mixed company.50 Haiti Teleco did, however, use S.A.M. periodically on letterhead and bills.51 And governmental officials, including President Jean Bertrand Aristide, appointed Patrick Joseph as General Director of Haiti Teleco in 2001, as well as various members of the board of directors, prior to being deposed in 2004. Other non-expert witnesses also stated their opinions that Haiti Teleco was a national, nationalized, or state-owned phone company. According to the first Bellerive declaration, the change in corporate formation was essential to allow the State to appoint its representatives to the Board of Directors, and Haiti Teleco never underwent legal change.52 On October 10, 1996, the Republic of Haiti passed a bill providing for the modernization of state-owned companies like Haiti Teleco through private
50 51 52

Id. at 65-97. Dkt. 482 at 31-32; Dkt. 800 at 64; Dkt. 492 at 70-71; Dkt. 703 at 7-8. Dkt. 581-1 at 4.

17

Case: 11-15331

Date (31 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 31 of 79

investment and government concessions.53 The modernization process of Haiti Teleco was completed between 2009 and 2010.54 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT Although the FCPA is aimed at corrupt payments made to foreign officials, the Government never established that Haiti Teleco performed government functions similar to a governmental department or agency, such that Haiti Telecos employees would qualify as foreign officials. Instead, the Government relied on the National Bank of Haitis ownership of stock in Haiti Teleco and the Haitian governments appointment board members and directors. Six days after the jury reached its verdict, however, the Government disclosed the existence of a declaration from the then-current Prime Minister of Haiti, Jean Max Bellerive, prepared ten days prior to the case going to the jury. The declaration stated that Haiti Teleco has never been and is not a State enterprise, and that the by-laws of the company had never been changed as required by law to make Haiti Teleco a government-owned entity. Under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963), the Government has an affirmative obligation under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to learn of any favorable evidence known to others acting on the governments
53 54

See Dkt. 482 at 53-54; Dkt. 701-111 at 39-41; Dkt. 704, Ex. 455T. Dkt. 482 at 54.

18

Case: 11-15331

Date (32 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 32 of 79

behalf in the case and disclose any potentially exculpatory evidence to the defendant. Esquenazi requested a Brady hearing to determine if and when the Government knew of the contents of this critical declaration. The district court erred in refusing to hold an evidentiary hearing under the circumstances. Esquenazi is also entitled to an acquittal on all FCPA-based counts because the term instrumentality in the FCPA should be construed to encompass only foreign entities performing governmental functions similar to departments or agencies. Here, the Government failed to establish that Haiti Teleco performed a governmental function. Despite the Governments continued reliance on the premise that state-ownership or state-control of a business entity makes that entity and instrumentality of the government under the FCPA, that theory was explicitly considered by the drafters of the FCPA, but not included in the statute, and is inconsistent with the language of the statute as drafted. Because so many individuals and companies prosecuted by the Government prefer to resolve their cases prior to trial, the validity of the Governments theory has seldom been tested in court, and never before by a United States Court of Appeals.55 This case presents an opportunity to review the Governments aggressive enforcement of a

See John Ashcroft & John Ratcliffe, The Recent and Unusual Evolution of an Expanding FCPA, 26 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Poly 25, 33-34 (2012); Mike Koehler, The Faade of FCPA Enforcement, 41 Geo. J. Intl L. 907, 927 (2010).

55

19

Case: 11-15331

Date (33 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 33 of 79

less-than-clear federal statute and properly limit its scope to corrupt payments made to foreign officials, including employees of instrumentalities that perform governmental functions similar to governmental departments and agencies. Esquenazi is also entitled to an acquittal or a new trial because the jury instructions failed to require that the jury determine whether Haiti Teleco ever exercised a government function akin to a department or agency, or even define governmental function. Because the jury could have reached its verdict without any consideration of the function of Haiti Teleco, the jury instructions were deficient. Finally, the district court improperly calculated Esquenazis sentence. Esquenazis leadership role should have been that of an organizer or manager rather than a leader. Further, his enhanced sentence for perjury was improper both as to the substance of the district courts findings and the procedure by which it made the determination. ARGUMENT I. THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED WHEN IT REFUSED TO CONDUCT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON BRADY ISSUES In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963), the Supreme Court held that the Government violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment when it suppresses material evidence favorable to the defendant, regardless of the good

20

Case: 11-15331

Date (34 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 34 of 79

faith or bad faith of the Government. Brady created an obligation on the Government to disclose potentially exculpatory information to the defense, even where no specific request has been made by the defendant for the evidence, and even if the evidence is useful only for impeachment. Brady, 373 U.S. at 87; United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 107-114 (1976); United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 676 (1985). The Government also has an affirmative obligation to learn of any favorable evidence known to others acting on the governments behalf in the case and disclose the potentially exculpatory evidence to the defendant. Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 437 (1995); see also Ward v. Hall, 592 F.3d 1144, 1183 (11th Cir. 2010). A Brady violation occurs, therefore, where: 1) the government possessed evidence that was favorable to the accused, because it is either exculpatory or impeaching; 2) the evidence was suppressed by the Government, either willfully or inadvertently; and 3) the evidence was material so as to establish prejudice. See Strickler v. Greene, 527 U.S. 263, 281-82 (1999); Kelley v. Secy for Dept of Corrs., 377 F.3d 1317, 1354 (11th Cir. 2004).56 Where a defendant can establish
56

Suppressed evidence is material when there is a reasonable probability that ... the result of the proceeding would have been different had the evidence been available to the defense. Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 57 (1987) (quotation omitted). A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 682 (1985).

21

Case: 11-15331

Date (35 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 35 of 79

the second and third factors, an evidentiary hearing is warranted to determine whether the Government improperly suppressed evidence. See Stano v. Dugger, 901 F.2d 898, 903-5 (11th Cir. 1990).57 In this case, six days after the jury reached its verdict, the Government turned over to the defense an affidavit from the Prime Minister of Haiti, Jean Max Bellerive, prepared ten days prior to the case going to the jury. That affidavit stated in no uncertain terms his opinion that Haiti Teleco has never been and is not a State enterprise. This information is material because it establishes the opinion of the head of the Haitian government, with law enforcement responsibilities, as to an essential element of the Governments FCPA counts whether employees of Haiti Teleco met the definition of foreign officials. The Governments only evidence on this element was the opinion of an expert witness, Gary Lissade, who in turn based his opinion on corporate letter head and bank ownership percentages but not on an examination of Haiti Telecos by-laws, coupled with generic statements by co-conspirators that Haiti Teleco was a national, nationalized, or state-owned phone company. Given the scant and circumstantial nature of the evidence, the Prime Ministers declaration, therefore,

See also United States v. Fernandez, 136 F.3d 1434, 1438-40 (11th Cir. 1998); United States v. Espinosa-Hernandez, 918 F.2d 911, 913-14 (11th Cir. 1990).

57

22

Case: 11-15331

Date (36 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 36 of 79

would have likely carried great weight with the jury and establishes a reasonable probability that the result of the proceeding would have been different had his opinion been available to the defense prior to the case being submitted to the jury. So too, would the fact that Haiti Telecos by-laws had never been changed, thus rendering President Aristides appointments to the Board of Directors invalid. Cf. United States v. McNab, 331 F.3d 1228, 1241 (11th Cir. 2003) (a court may rely upon [the] representations by foreign officials as to the validity of their governments laws). Based on the declaration, Esquenazi joined in Rodriquezs motion for a judgment of acquittal or new trial based upon newly discovered evidence and requested a hearing on the new evidence to examine possible Brady issues. The district court denied the motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. In so doing, the district court held that 1) the defense was already aware of the information; 2) that the second affidavit established that Haiti Teleco was a government entity; and 3) that the Government adequately established by affidavit that it was not aware of the first Bellerive affidavit until August 9, 2011. But none of the district courts reasons vitiated the need for a Brady hearing. In the first place, there is no evidence that the defense was aware of either the Prime Ministers opinion regarding the legal status of Haiti Telco or the fact that the by-laws had not been changed as required under Haitian law. The fact that

23

Case: 11-15331

Date (37 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 37 of 79

Esquenazi and Rodriguez had an expert that was prepared to testify that Haiti Teleco was not a public entity does not establish that the defense knew of either the Prime Ministers opinion regarding the status of Haiti Telco or the fact that the bylaws had not been changed thus invalidating President Aristides appointments. Second, Prime Ministers Bellerives second affidavit does not establish that Haiti Teleco was a government entity. The second declaration expressly affirms all of the content of the first affidavit, including the assertion that Haiti Teleco has never been and is not a State enterprise. All the second affidavit asserts is that Haiti Teleco was part of the public administration. But no effort is made to explain the difference between a state enterprise in the first declaration and public administration in the second, government-prepared, declaration or how those two statements can be reconciled. And most critically, the second declaration does not alter the fact that Haiti Telecos by-laws had not been properly amended, as stated in the first declaration. Third, the Governments response only establishes that the Government was not aware of the existence of the declaration until August 9, 2011. It does not establish when the Government was aware of the substance contained in the declaration i.e., that the Prime Minister did not consider Haiti Teleco to be a state enterprise, or that Haiti Telecos by-laws had not been amended as required to become a state enterprise. Nor does the Governments response establish

24

Case: 11-15331

Date (38 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 38 of 79

what, if any, efforts it made to discover Haitian officials opinions regarding the status of Haiti Telco or whether the by-laws had been amended. Given the degree of cooperation between the Haitian government and the Government in this case a fact illustrated by the prompt second affidavit from Prime Minister Bellerive that was created by the Government58 - the Haitian governments knowledge may be imputed to the Government. See United States v. Antone, 603 F.2d 566, 569-70 (5th Cir. 1979) (holding that federal prosecutor was charged with knowledge possessed by state investigators given the extent of interaction and cooperation between the two governments). Given these unique circumstances, the district courts failure to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the Government had complied with its Brady obligations was an abuse of discretion. II. ESQUENAZI IS ENTITLED TO AN ACQUITTAL BECAUSE EMPLOYEES OF HAITI TELECO WERE NOT DIRECTED FOREIGN OFFICIALS WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE FCPA SIMPLY BECAUSE THE NATIONAL BANK OF HAITI OWNED SHARES OF HAITI TELECO AND THE HAITIAN GOVERNMENT APPOINTED BOARD MEMBERS AND DIRECTORS The FCPA was primarily designed to protect the integrity of American foreign policy and domestic markets. Lamb v. Phillip Morris, Inc., 915 F.2d 1024, 1029 (6th Cir. 1990). Among other things, the FCPA prohibits making corrupt
58

See also Dkt. 581-2 at 4, 9 ([T]he Government of Haiti has always supported and will continue to support the Government of the United Sates in its efforts to fight against corruption[.]).

25

Case: 11-15331

Date (39 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 39 of 79

payments to a foreign official or a foreign political party or official thereof or any candidate for political office for the purpose of influencing the acts or decisions of the foreign official in his official capacity, or inducing the foreign official to influence an act or decision of the government or its instrumentality in order to obtain or retain business on behalf of a private concern. 15 U.S.C. 78dd2(a)(1)-(2). Congress, in turn, defined the term foreign official as any officer or employee of a foreign government or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof or any person acting in an official capacity for or on behalf of any such government or department, agency, or instrumentality[.] 15 U.S.C. 78-dd2(h)(2)(A). There is no dispute that Haiti Teleco is not a department or agency of the Haitian government. The indictment instead labeled Haiti Teleco as a stateowned national telecommunications company,59 which the Government claimed made it an instrumentality of the Haitian government.60 The jury instructions were based on the same instrumentality theory.61 The FCPA, however, does not define instrumentality of a foreign government. Rather than conduct a statutory analysis to determine the meaning of
59 60 61

Dkt. 3 at 2, 3. Dkt. 283. Dkt. 294.

26

Case: 11-15331

Date (40 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 40 of 79

the term instrumentality as it appears in the FCPA, the district court simply adopted the Governments conclusory position on instrumentality at the motion to dismiss, jury instruction, and post-trial motion stages. The only court that has attempted to construe the term in light of its statutory context has limited instrumentality to entities that perform governmental functions. See United States v. Carson, No. SACR 0900077JVS, 2011 WL 5101701, *5 (C.D. Cal. May 18, 2011). This Court should hold likewise breach of the context of the FCPA, the rules of construction for an ambiguous statute, and avoidance of constitutional vagueness. Because no evidence was presented at trial that Haiti Teleco performed governmental functions, Esquenazis conviction for violation of, and conspiracy to violate, the FCPA should be reversed; the money laundering and wire transfer counts, which are predicted on a violation of the FCPA must therefore likewise fail. A. The FCPA Must Be Construed to Exclude Payments Made to State-Owned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions.

The FCPA is not a model of clarity.62 As noted above, the FCPA does not define instrumentality of a foreign government, and nowhere in the statute are state-owned companies or government ownership of the stock of a privately62

See United States v. Kay, 359 F.3d 738, 743-44 (5th Cir. 2004) (finding obtain or retain business language in FCPA to be ambiguous).

27

Case: 11-15331

Date (41 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 41 of 79

formed business discussed as possible instrumentalities.63 The Dictionary Act, 1 U.S.C. 1-6, likewise offers no definition of instrumentality, and instrumentality certainly does not have an established meaning at common law.64 The standard dictionary definition of instrumentality offers little help.65 Blacks Law Dictionary, for example, defines instrumentality as [s]omething by which an end is achieved; a means, medium, agency.66 But no ends or means are specified in the FCPA. The term thus could potentially encompass: 1) government bureaus akin to a department or agency, like the FBI or SEC ; 2) quasi-official agencies, like the Legal Services Corporation; 3) government-run programs or businesses, like the TVA; 4) programs or businesses that a government has invested in, provided funding for, or licensed, like AIG or GM; 5) businesses that

See Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 1885, 1891 (2011) ([b]ecause the statute does not define report, we look first to the words ordinary meaning and looking to dictionary definitions); United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507, 511 (2008) (When a term is undefined, we give it its ordinary meaning.). See Stewart v. Dutra Constr. Co., 543 U.S. 481, 489 (2005) (relying on Dictionary Act); Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden, 503 U.S. 318, 323 (1992) (relying on common law meaning of employee). See Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1441, 1449-50 (2012) (examining dictionary definitions to determine meaning of actual). Blacks Law Dictionary at 801 (6th ed. 1990); see also The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: New College Edition at 681 (1981) ([t]he quality or circumstance of being instrumental, or [a]gency; means); Websters New World College Dictionary (4th ed. 2002) (the condition, quality, or fact of being instrumental, or serving as a means or a means or agency).
66 65 64

63

28

Case: 11-15331

Date (42 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 42 of 79

have received government tax breaks or other incentives, like nearly every company in the United States; 6) an entire regulated industry, like agriculture, banking, or telecommunications; 7) privatized, government-formed companies, like Fannie Mae; 8) government contractors; or even 9) completely private businesses that step in to take the place of former government-run programs. In short, based on dictionary definitions alone, an instrumentality could include almost anything that accomplishes some unspecified purpose (governmental or not) that benefits from government action or inaction. But it is, of course, the statutory context that controls. See Small v. United States, 544 U.S. 385, 396-98 (2005); see also Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 514, 519 (1923) ([A] word may be known by the company it keeps.). And the statutory context of the FCPA dictates that the term instrumentality should be construed to exclude both state-owned business enterprises that do not perform governmental functions and employees of the same. In the alternative, considering that the FCPAs definition of foreign official is ambiguous, the legislative history, similar statutory use of instrumentality, and the Rule of Lenity require the same construction. Finally, if the FCPA is not construed to exclude both state-owned business enterprises that do not perform governmental functions and employees of the same ambiguity, then the FCPA is unconstitutionally vague as applied to Esquenazi.

29

Case: 11-15331

Date (43 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 43 of 79

1.

The Statutory Context of the FCPA Indicates that Instrumentality Must Be Construed to Exclude Both State-Owned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions and Employees of the Same.

The statutory context of the FCPA indicates that instrumentality must be read to exclude both state-owned business enterprises that do not perform governmental functions, as well as their employees, because: 1) the FCPA is aimed at foreign governments; 2) the term instrumentality is to be read in line with government departments and agencies; and 3) treating employees of all stateowned enterprises as foreign officials would lead to absurd results. It is well-settled that in construing terms within criminal statutes, courts should look to the context including the evils being addressed by the language of the statute. See Leocal v. Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1, 9-10 (2004). The context of the FCPA reveals that Congress was particularly focused on the evils of bribing foreign public officials. In addition to the prohibition covering foreign officials, the statute also prohibits corrupt payments to any foreign political party or official thereof or any candidate for foreign political office. 15 U.S.C. 78dd-2(a)(2). And within the definition of foreign official, Congress in 1998 added officers and employees of public international organizations. Congress also created an exception to the FCPA for facilitating or expediting payment[s] made to secure routine governmental action, 15 U.S.C. 78dd-2(b) (emphasis added), implying that non-routine governmental action is still covered by the FCPA. Finally, the 30

Case: 11-15331

Date (44 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 44 of 79

FCPA contains an affirmative defense for reasonable, bona fide payments to foreign officials directly related to, among other things, the execution or performance of a contract with a foreign government or agency thereof. 15 U.S.C. 78dd-(2)(c)(2)(B). This again illustrates an exception from the FCPAs general governmental focus. In short, every time Congress specified the evils that the FCPA is meant to address, it identified political, public, or governmental actors, not state-owned enterprises that do not perform a political, public, or governmental function. The word instrumentality, moreover, should be read narrowly not only in light of the word it seeks to define (foreign official), but also in light of the words it follows: a governmental department or agency. See United States v. Stevens, 130 S. Ct. 1577, 1588 (2010) ([A]n unclear definitional phrase may take meaning from the term to be defined,); United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285, 294 (2008) (When taken in isolation, the two remaining verbspromotes and presents are susceptible of multiple and wide-ranging meanings[,] but those meanings are narrowed by the commonsense canon of noscitur a sociiswhich counsels that a word is given more precise content by the neighboring words with which it is associated); Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Train Dispatchers, 499 U.S. 117, 129 (1991) (Under the principle of ejusdem generis, when a general term follows a specific one, the general term should be understood as a reference to subjects akin

31

Case: 11-15331

Date (45 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 45 of 79

to the one with specific enumeration.). All three neighboring words, official, government department, and government agency suggest a specific governmental position, subdivision, or function.67 As such, the phrase governmental instrumentality should be read to either: 1) be a governmental subdivision; or 2) require the performance of some governmental function. There is nothing in the language of the FCPA to suggest that state-ownership or control of entity is enough. For the same reason, employees of a state-owned enterprise should not be deemed part of the relatively small class of foreign officials unless the enterprise is performing a governmental function similar to a political subdivision.68 Cf. Hall v. American National Red Cross, 86 F.3d 919, 921 (9th Cir. 1996) ({t}he use of the word instrumentality in a general, inclusionary definition does not indicate an intention to encompass entities which are not part of the government, even though they may be governmental instrumentalities in some sense.).

67 68

Cf. 18 U.S.C. 112 & 1116.

See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated August 9, 2000, 218 F. Supp. 2d 544, 557 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (holding that FCPA involves foreign public officials and by definition, violations of the FCPA touch upon official acts of sovereign nations, and every investigation of a suspected violation of the FCPA has the potential to impugn the integrity of the officials of foreign sovereigns); United States v. Blondek, 741 F. Supp. 116, 120 (N.D. Tex. 1990) (concluding that foreign officials are a small class of persons and a well-defined group).

32

Case: 11-15331

Date (46 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 46 of 79

Finally, in construing statutes, courts should avoid interpretations that lead to farfetched or absurd results. See Nixon v. Missouri Municipal League, 541 U.S. 125, 138 (2004); United States v. American Trucking Assns., Inc., 310 U.S. 534, 543 (1940). The use of the phrase foreign official itself suggests that the individuals who fall within the sweep of statute are not simply employees of stateowned enterprises who do not perform governmental functions. This is borne out not only by considering the absurdity such a position would create if courts categorized domestic employees of entities like GM or AIG as officials, but also by the provisions of the FCPA itself. For example, the FCPAs exception for expediting payments for routine governmental actions would apply to actions of governmental employees. But since employees of state-owned enterprises are not governmental employees, the Governments theory would create a gap in which expediting payments to employees of governmental departments or agencies are not criminalized under the FCPA, but similar payments to employees of state-owned enterprises are. Similarly, the Governments position would make a hash out of the FCPAs affirmative defense that allows for payments of reasonable and bona fide expenditures directly related to the execution or performance of a contract with a foreign government or agency thereof. 15 U.S.C. 78dd-2(c)(2)(B). Because the affirmative defense does not include a reference to instrumentality, under the

33

Case: 11-15331

Date (47 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 47 of 79

Governments position there would be no affirmative defense available when otherwise qualifying payments are made to state-owned enterprises. The only way to avoid this absurdity is to read instrumentality as a governmental subdivision, instead of just a non-governmental but state-owned enterprise. The context of the FCPA supports an interpretation of the word instrumentality consistent with a governmental or political subdivision - such as a bureau (like the Federal Bureau of Investigation), a commission (like the Federal Trade Commission), a committee (like the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States), or a board (like the National Labor Relations Board) - that performs a governmental function. While some governmental divisions may operate in the form of a state-owned enterprise, not all state-owned enterprises perform governmental functions.69 Thus, this Court should construe instrumentality to require the Government to prove that a state-owned enterprise performs a governmental function before payments made to that entity are deemed within the sweep of the FCPA.

Cf. 28 U.S.C. 2671 (Federal agency includes the executive departments, the judicial and legislative branches, the military departments, independent establishments of the United States, and corporations primarily acting as instrumentalities or agencies of the United States, but does not include any contractor with the United States).

69

34

Case: 11-15331

Date (48 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 48 of 79

2.

In the Alternative, the FCPAs Definition of Foreign Official Is Ambiguous, and Should Be Construed to Exclude State-Owned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions.

If the FCPA is not construed as set forth immediately above, then the FCPAs definition of foreign official is ambiguous, given the multitude of varied and indeterminate meanings conveyed solely by the dictionary definitions. See Deal v. United States, 508 U.S. 129, 131-32 (1993). The legislative history, similar statutory use of instrumentality, and the rule of lenity also require the FCPA to be construed to exclude both state-owned business enterprises that do not perform governmental functions and employees of the same. a. Legislative History Supports Construing the FCPA to Exclude State-Owned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions.

When a statute is as vague or ambiguous as the FCPA, other interpretative tools may be used, including an examination of the acts purpose and of its legislative history. See Garcia v. United States, 469 U.S. 70, 75-76 n.3 (1984); United States v. Pringle, 350 F.3d 1172, 1180 n.11 (11th Cir. 2003). Several courts have looked to legislative history for help in construing the FCPA.70

See United States v. Kozeny, 582 F. Supp. 2d 535 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) (exploring legislative history on the FCPAs local law affirmative defense); United States v. Jensen, 532 F. Supp. 2d 1187 (N.D. Cal. 2008) (exploring legislative history on the FCPAs penalty provisions); United States v. Bodmer, 342 F. Supp. 2d 176 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (exploring legislative history on the FCPAs jurisdiction).

70

35

Case: 11-15331

Date (49 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 49 of 79

As detailed in Professor Michael J. Koehlers declaration filed in United States v. Carson, the legislative history of the FCPA is both extensive and complex.71 Although the legislative history also does not offer a clear definition of the term instrumentality, several salient points stand out: 1. The events discussed by Congress that eventually gave rise to the FCPA concerned allegations that domestic companies had made payments to traditional foreign government officials or foreign political parties.72 2. Congress used the terms foreign government official, foreign public official, and foreign official interchangeably during discussions on the bills that eventually became the FCPA.73 3. At the time it was considering the bills that eventually became the FCPA, Congress was aware of questionable payments to state-owned entities. Several draft competing bills specifically included state-owned entities, but the bills that eventually became the FCPA did not.74 4. In 1998, in accordance with the adoption of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (OECD Convention), Congress amended the definition of foreign official to include public international organizations. Congress did not amend the

United States v. Carson, No. SA CR 09-00077-JVS (C.D. Cal.), DE 305 (Koehler Dec.); see also Ex. I to Defendant Rodriguezs Motion for Release Pending Appeal. See Territory of Alaska v. American Can Company, 358 U.S. 224, 226-27 (1959) (a court can take judicial notice of legislative history). Koehler Dec. at 16(a), 29, 33, 39, 42-43, 49, 58-59, 75-77, 91, 159, 16566, 197, 222, 236, 243, 252, 269, 301, 327, and 336.
73 74 72

71

Koehler Dec. at 16(b), 76, 108, 183, 238, 253, 266, 273, 275, and 336. Koehler Dec. at 16(c),(d),(f), 41, 79, 95, 148-51, 162, 230-31, and 279-80.

36

Case: 11-15331

Date (50 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 50 of 79

definition to include officials of public enterprises, despite the fact that that term was included and defined in the OECD convention.75 Based on the foregoing, the legislative history supports construing the term instrumentality to include only those entities similar to departments and agencies that perform a governmental function, rather than businesses such as Haiti Teleco that are merely owned or controlled by a foreign government. b. The Use of the Term Instrumentality in Other Statutes Supports Construing the FCPA to Exclude State-Owned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions.

When a term is ambiguous, courts may look to the use of a similar term in other statutes to help determine the meaning of the ambiguous term. See Robinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337, 341-42 (1997). Several domestic statutes that use but do not define the word instrumentality have construed the term narrowly to require more than just governmental ownership, regulation, or funding. In the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), for example, certain governmental plan[s] are exempt from its provisions. The statute defines such plans as those established by the Government of the United States, by the government of any State or political subdivision thereof, or by any agency or instrumentality of any of the foregoing.

Koehler Dec. at 17, 385-89, 407, 428, and 435-37. See also DE 283 at 12-13.

75

37

Case: 11-15331

Date (51 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 51 of 79

28 U.S.C. 1002(32). The term instrumentality in ERISA has been construed by courts to be limited to those entities that perform a governmental function. See Koval v. Washington County Redevelopment Authority, 574 F.3d 238, 240-41 (3d Cir. 2009); Rose v. Long Island R.R. Pension Plan, 828 F.2d 910, 917-18 (2d Cir. 1987). Similarly, the Supreme Court has construed the word instrumentalities or agencies under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 1346(b), 2671, to require a showing of the day-to-day power to direct the detailed physical performance of a contractor. United States v. Orleans, 425 U.S. 807, 814-16 (1976). The Court rejected an argument the mere provision of funds and regulation by the government were sufficient, standing alone, to turn a contractor into an instrumentality.76 Id. at 815-16. In contrast, when Congress intended to include state-owned entities in the definition of instrumentality, it knew how to do so. Indeed, in enacting the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), Congress specifically included entities a majority of whose shares or other ownership interest is owned by a foreign statute or political subdivisions within the definition of agency or instrumentality Similar examples abound. See, e.g., Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12131(1) & (B) (defining public entity as any department, agency, special purpose district, or other instrumentality of a State or States or local government[.]); Edison v. Douberly, 604 F.3d 1307, 1309-10 & n.4 (11th Cir. 2010) (holding that the term instrumentality of a State refers to governmental units or units created by them).
76

38

Case: 11-15331

Date (52 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 52 of 79

of a foreign state. 28 U.S.C. 1603(b). Likewise, in the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub.L. No. 111203, 124 Stat. 1376, 1054 (2010), codified at 15 U.S.C. 78m(q)(1)(B), Congress specifically defined foreign government to include a department, agency, or instrumentality of a foreign government, or a company owned by a foreign government, as determined by the Commission. Id. (emphasis added). The presence of such explicit definitions in FSIA and Dodd-Frank regarding foreign-owned entities indicates that Congress knew how to include such language in the FCPA, but chose not to do so. See Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank, 511 U.S. 164, 176-77 (1994) (Congress knew how to impose aiding and abetting liability when it chose to do so, but it did not use the words aid and abet in the statute, and, hence, did not impose aiding and abetting liability); see also Whitfield v. United States, 543 U.S. 209, 216 (2005) (applying same principle to conspiracy to commit money laundering statute). That absence in the FCPAs definition of instrumentality is significant and warrants construing instrumentality narrowly. Thus, state-owned or statecontrolled entities that are not political subdivisions that perform governmental functions should not be grafted into the definition instrumentality. See Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson, 538 U.S. 468, 475-76 (2003) (contrasting the absence of

39

Case: 11-15331

Date (53 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 53 of 79

language in FSIA with that used in other statutes and concluding that the absence of language was instructive). c. The Rule of Lenity Requires the Court to Construe the FCPA to Exclude State-Owned Business Enterprises that Do Not Perform Governmental Functions.

When, after consulting traditional canons of statutory construction, a court is left with an ambiguous statute, it should apply the well-thought rule of lenity. United States v. Shabani, 513 U.S. 10, 17 (1994). The rule of lenity requires that a criminal statute be strictly construed in favor of the accused so as to apply only to conduct clearly covered. United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507, 514 (2008); United States v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259, 266 (1997). Where, as here, a court is left to guess as to what Congress intended, the rule of lenity should be applied. See Reno v. Koray, 515 U.S. 50, 65 (1995). Ties should go to the defendant. Santos, 553 U.S. at 514. Put another way, unless the Governments position is unambiguously correct, the Court must resolve the ambiguity in Esquenazis favor. See United States v. Granderson, 511 U.S. 39, 54 (1994) ([W]here text, structure, and history fail to establish that the Governments position is unambiguously correct, the court must apply the rule of lenity and resolve the ambiguity in the defendants favor). Indeed, at least one court has previously applied the rule of lenity to the FCPA. See United States v. Bodmer, 342 F. Supp. 2d 176 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).

40

Case: 11-15331

Date (54 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 54 of 79

The Government certainly has not demonstrated that its position on the meaning of instrumentality is unambiguously correct. To the contrary, based on the statutory context, legislative history, and similar uses of the term in other statutes, the Government cannot do so. As such, the rule of lenity requires a narrow construction of the FCPA that excludes Esquenazis conduct. See United States v. Brown, 459 F.3d 509, 523 (5th Cir. 2006) (Given our repeated exhortation against expanding federal criminal jurisdiction beyond specific federal statutes to the defining of common-law crimes, we resist the incremental expansion of a statute that is vague and amorphous on its face and depends for its constitutionality on the clarity divined from a jumble of disparate cases. . . . Instead, we apply the rule of lenity and opt for the narrower, reasonable interpretation that here excludes the Defendants conduct). 3. In the Alternative, the FCPA Is Unconstitutionally Vague as Applied to Esquenazi.

The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment requires that a penal statute define [a] criminal offense with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited and in a manner that does not encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement. Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 357 (1983). A statute is unconstitutionally vague if people of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application. Connally v. Gen. Constr. Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391 (1926); see also United States v. 41

Case: 11-15331

Date (55 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 55 of 79

Biro, 143 F.3d 1421 (11th Cir. 1998). The touchstone of fair warning is whether it was reasonably clear at the relevant time that a defendants conduct was criminal under the statute, either standing alone or as construed. United States v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259, 267 (1997). If the FCPA is not construed to exclude both state-owned business enterprises that do not perform governmental functions and employees of the same either based on the statutory context or through resolution of the statutory ambiguity, then the only alternative is to find that the FCPA is unconstitutionally vague as applied to Esquenazi. As illustrated above, based on dictionary definitions alone, an instrumentality could include almost anything that accomplishes some unspecified purpose (governmental or not) that in some form benefits from government action or inaction. Thus, it certainly is not clear from the face of the FCPA that employees of business enterprises in which a government holds some sort of ownership interest qualify as foreign officials. And unlike the situation at issue in United States v. Kay, whether Haiti Teleco qualifies as an instrumentality determines whether his conduct was criminal or not. See United States v. Kay, 513 F.3d 432, 441-42 (5th Cir. 2007) (noting that, regardless of the meaning of the phrase business nexus, the defendant was was treading close to a reasonably-defined line of illegality). If Haiti Teleco was a purely private enterprise, there would be no FCPA violation, no

42

Case: 11-15331

Date (56 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 56 of 79

violation of Haitian bribery laws, and several of the predicate acts for the money laundering and wire fraud violations would disappear. But the statutory definition provides no basis for Esquenazi to know whether Haiti Teleco or its employees were subject to the FCPA (potentially rendering payments may be criminal) or not (rendering the payments non-criminal). Individuals like Esquenazi are left guessing as to whether the statute covers an entity with which they deal. Consequently, instrumentality is a vague term that escapes comprehension by people of common intelligence - a point echoed by many FCPA commentators. See, e.g., Koehler, The Faade of FCPA Enforcement, 41 Geo. J. Intl L. at 998 (criticizing foreign official definition as vague and ambiguous); James R. Doty, Toward a Reg. FCPA: A Modest Proposal for Change in Administering the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 62 Bus. Law. 1233, 1238-39 (2007) (Vagueness and ambiguity are the DNA of the FCPA, which on its face is purposefully and for companies seeking to comply, often maddeningly short on specifics.). The Governments theory that state-owned enterprises in some cases (depending on a fact-intensive inquiry) may qualify as an instrumentality does nothing to remedy the complete open-endedness of the threshold issue of statutory coverage. In fact, the vagueness in the statute gives largely unfettered discretion to prosecutors, especially at the charging stage, as to whether a particular business

43

Case: 11-15331

Date (57 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 57 of 79

entity falls within the ambit of the FCPA.77 Such discretion, however, is inconsistent with constitutional Due Process standards. Cf. United States v. Nosal, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 1176119, *6 (9th Cir. April 10, 2012) (noting, in context of CFAA prosecution, that we shouldnt have to live at the mercy of our local prosecutor. And its not clear we can trust the government when a tempting target comes along.); United v. Goyal, 629 F.3d 912, 922 (9th Cir. 2011) (Kozinski, C.J., concurring) (noting in context of securities fraud prosecution that [t]his is just one of a string of recent cases in which courts have found that federal prosecutors overreached by trying to stretch criminal law beyond its proper bounds, which is not the way criminal law is supposed to work) (citations omitted). To satisfy the Due Process Clause, the FCPA must either be construed in a limited fashion or be invalidated. See Skilling v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2896, 2927-28 (2010).

See Ashcroft & Ratcliffe, The Recent and Unusual Evolution of an Expanding FCPA, 26 NOTRE DAME J.L. ETHICS & PUB. POLY at 34 (noting that concerns over, among other things, prosecutors unfettered discretion in the absence of judicial construction to extend the boundaries of FCPA interpretation to fit the facts and circumstances of any particular investigation are worthy of consideration).

77

44

Case: 11-15331

Date (58 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 58 of 79

B.

The Government Failed to Present Any Evidence that Haiti Teleco Performed a Governmental Function Similar to that Performed by Political Subdivisions Like a Department or Agency.

The Governments case regarding Haiti Telecos qualification as an instrumentality under the FCPA rested on four categories of evidence: 1) the testimony of Gary Lissade;78 2) the testimony of various individuals that Haiti Teleco was state-owned or nationalized;79 3) documents evidencing Haitian governmental appointments to Haiti Telecos Board of Directors and position of Director General;80 and 4) an alleged insurance application.81 None of these categories, however, whether viewed in isolation or combination, establish that Haiti Teleco was an instrumentality performing a governmental function akin to a department or agency under the FCPA. Mr. Lissades only opined that Haiti Teleco was part of the public administration of Haiti a term that is different from the FCPAs

78 79

See Dkt. 493 at 31-98 (testimony of Gary Lissade).

Dkt. 716 at 11-15 (testimony of Robert Antoine); Dkt. 482 at 31-32 (testimony of Jean Fourcand); Dkt. at 800 tt 64 (testimony of Juan Diaz).
80 81

Government Exhibits 404, 451-458; 404T, 451T-458T.

Dkt. 492 at 70-71 (testimony of Antonio Perez); Dkt. 703 at 7-8 (testimony of John Marsha); see generally DE 561 at 5-8.

45

Case: 11-15331

Date (59 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 59 of 79

instrumentality and which the district court confessed it did not understand.82 Otherwise, Mr. Lissades testimony was focused on the Haitian governments control over the appointment of officials to the Board of Directors and the Director General position (a right the government had with respect to the board of directors since the 1968 inception of the company as an admittedly private enterprise), benefits Haiti Teleco received (again dating back to the 1968 formation of the private company); Government ownership, via the National Bank, of 97% of the stock of Haiti Teleco; and occasional references to Haiti Teleco as a S.A.M. (even though no formal legal act was ever taken to transform Haiti Teleco into an S.A.M., as was required by Haitian law to qualify as a state-run entity). This evidence, however, does not establish that Haiti Teleco performed a governmental function akin to a department or agency under the FCPA no testimony was elicited on that subject. After all, appealing to rights and privileges that largely, if not entirely, existed when Haiti Teleco was a private company hardly establishes that the company was somehow transformed into a government instrumentality simply because the National Bank purchased stocks in the company.

Dkt. 493 at 37 (in response to Governments request that Mr. Lissade be accepted as an expert on Haitian public institution, the district court responded And Haitian public institutions. I dont know what that means but, yeah).

82

46

Case: 11-15331

Date (60 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 60 of 79

Whats more, several countervailing pieces of evidence strongly suggest that during the relevant time period (2001-04), Haiti Teleco was not operating anything like a department or agency of the Haitian government. Consider that no law or public pronouncement announced a change to public or governmental status; no effort was made to formally transform the company into S.A.M. as required by Haitian law; no effort was made to alter the by-laws of Haiti Teleco (a point later revealed by the Bellerive declaration); and on October 16, 1996, Haiti passed a law modernizing or privatizing Haiti Teleco. And, given the lack of a change of status to a S.A.M. or revision of the by-laws, the appointments and commissions made by the President of Haiti were in any event not invalid. So uncertain was Haiti Telecos status during this period, that even Mr. Lissade had to admit there was no specific law that has decided that at the beginning that [Haiti] Teleco is public entity, and that if there was a doubt whatsoever, the law came in 2008 vanish completely this doubt by name, by citing Teleco as a public administration.83 When Governments cannot determining whether a state-owned business qualifies loosely as part of the public administration, except with the benefit of hindsight unavailable to the defendant,

83

Dkt. 493 at 60.

47

Case: 11-15331

Date (61 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 61 of 79

the evidence can hardly be sufficient to establish the narrower statutory requirements for an instrumentality under the FCPA. The rest of the evidence, even if assumed true, fails to establish that Haiti Teleco qualified as a government instrumentality akin to a government department or agency. Public perception of state-ownership or control cannot be presumed to accurately reflect legal requirements and even if it could, state ownership is not equivalent to government function. Nor do references to S.A.M on letterhead and bills, or instrumentality in purported insurance documents, establish that Haiti Teleco operated as an instrumentality as that term is used in the FCPA. None of these thin pieces of evidence, standing alone or together, provide sufficient proof that Haiti Teleco was providing true government functions like a government department or agency would. C. Esquenazi Is Also Entitled to Acquittal on the Money Laundering and Wire Transfer Counts Because They Were Predicated on Unproven FCPA Violations.

In addition to the FCPA courts, the indictment also charged Esquenazi with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371 and 1343 (Count 1); one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1956(h) (Count 9); and twelve counts of concealment money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) (Counts 10 through 21).

48

Case: 11-15331

Date (62 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 62 of 79

The three predicate specified unlawful activities for the money laundering counts were violations of FCPA, wire fraud, and Haitian Bribery law.84 Because, as discussed above, there was no evidence presented that Haiti Teleco performed a government function, or that its employees qualified as public officials, Esquenazi is entitled to acquittal on the FCPA counts thus removing the first of the Governments predicate unlawful activities for the money laundering counts. The second predicate unlawful activity was wire fraud. But it, too, was directly predicated in part on a putative FCPA violation. Count 1 alleged a conspiracy with the object of violating the FCPA and committing wire fraud as part of the FCPA violation. Absent an FCPA violation, no fraudulent conduct was alleged or proven with respect to the FCPA predicate act sufficient to constitute wire fraud. Thus, the second of the Governments unlawful predicate acts for the money laundering counts is also inadequate.85

84 85

Dkt. 3, at 24-25, 15.

In addition, as argued by Co-Appellant Rodriguez and adopted herein, the Government relied on intra-state wire transfers at trial, which are inadequate to establish the remaining predicate act for wire fraud. See United States v. Robertson, 493 F.3d 1322, 1331 (11th Cir. 2007); United States v. Izydore, 167 F.3d 213, 219 (5th Cir. 1999). The district courts instructions failed to properly instruct the jury on the requirement that the wire communication cross state lines.

49

Case: 11-15331

Date (63 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 63 of 79

The only remaining possible predicate specified unlawful act is a violation of the Haitian Bribery law under 18 U.S.C. 1956(c)(7)(B). But Section 1956 requires that the bribery involve a public official. That term too is undefined, but as established above, the plain meaning is the holder of a public office though not all persons in public employment are public officials, because [a] public officials position requires the exercise of some portion of the sovereign power, whether great or small. Blacks Law Dictionary at 1230 (6th ed. 1990). The district courts instruction impermissibly broadened the definition of public official to include any agent or officer of a public authority.86 Reading the term public official in Section 1956 more broadly than the term foreign official in the FCPA simply cannot be justified.87 Consequently, foreign bribery under Haitian law cannot serve as a specified unlawful predicate act. Absent a specified unlawful predicate act, both the money laundering and conspiracy counts fail. See United States v. Galardi, 476 F.2d 1072, 1079 (9th Cir. 1973) (It should require no citation of authority to say that a person cannot

86 87

Dkt. 527 at 23.

In addition, as argued by Co-Appellant Rodriguez and adopted herein, the Government failed to prove that a violation of the Haitian bribery statute amounted to a felony under foreign law as required by 18 U.S.C. 1956(c)(1). The Governments expert testified that a violation of the Haitian bribery statute could be treated like a misdemeanor. See Dkt. 493 at 55. The district courts instructions failed to properly instruct the jury on this requirement.

50

Case: 11-15331

Date (64 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 64 of 79

conspire to commit a crime against the United States when the facts reveal there could be no violation of the statute under which the conspiracy is charged.) Thus, Esquenazi is entitled to an acquittal on all counts. III. THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS ON THE FCPA DID NOT ADEQUATELY CONVEY THE REQUISITE GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTION NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH THAT HAITI TELECO WAS AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE HAITIAN GOVERNMENT OR ESQUENAZIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE SAME Jury instructions must adequately convey all statutory requisites for a criminal offense. See Arthur Anderson LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696, 706 (2005). Prior to trial, Esquenazi proposed jury instructions defining foreign official and instrumentality of a foreign government as part of the foreign government itself.88 The district court, however, rejected Esquenazis proposed instruction, opting instead for a far broader instruction that defined instrumentality as a means or agency through which a function of the foreign government is accomplished, and specifically stated that [s]tate-owned or statecontrolled companies that provide services to the public may meet this definition89 The district court then further broadened the definition by providing

88 89

Dkt. 404 at 6. Dkt. 520 at 23.

51

Case: 11-15331

Date (65 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 65 of 79

the jury the following non-exclusive list of factors to determine whether Haiti Teleco was an instrumentality: 1. Whether it provides services to the citizens and inhabitants of Haiti; 2. whether its key officers and directors are government officials or are appointed by government officials; 3. the extent of Haitis ownership of Teleco, including whether the Haitian government owns a majority of Telecos shares or provides financial support such as subsidies, special tax treatment, loans, or revenue from government-mandated fees; 4. Telecos obligations and privileges under Haitian law, including whether Teleco exercises exclusive or controlling power to administer its designated function; and 5. whether Teleco is widely perceived and understood to be performing official or governmental functions.90 The district court instructed that the jury need not find that all the factors listed above weigh in favor of Teleco being an instrumentality in order to find that Teleco is an instrumentality.91 The Court, however, totally provided no clarification as to what it meant by official or governmental functions. The district courts jury instructions were inadequate as given. In the first place, the instructions are not cumulative, but non-exhaustive and disjunctive. As a result, that the jury could have determined that Haiti Teleco was an
90 91

Id. at 23 -24. Id.

52

Case: 11-15331

Date (66 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 66 of 79

instrumentality simply because it provides services to the citizens and inhabitants of Haiti, the Haitian government owns a majority of Haiti Teleco (or provides financial support such as subsidies, special tax treatment, loans, or revenue from government-mandated fees), or Haitian law creates obligations or privileges for Haiti Teleco.92 None of these elements, of course, establish whether Haiti Teleco was performing a governmental function akin to a political subdivision of the Haitian government. Thus, even if the instructions included a requirement that Haiti Teleco actually perform such a governmental function, the non-exhaustive and disjunctive list would allow a jury to find that Haiti Teleco was an instrumentality without considering whether it actually preformed one. This error is only compounded by the district courts broad definition of instrumentality as a means or agency through which a function of the foreign government is accomplished, and its statement, without qualification or explanation, that [s]tate-owned or state-controlled companies that provide services to the public may meet this definition. As for the remaining elements, state appointment of directors and officers and public perception are likewise inadequate. Appointment power is referenced in element two, but appointment power, standing alone or in combination with the

92

Dkt. 404; Dkt. 527 at 23-24 (elements (1), (3), and (4)).

53

Case: 11-15331

Date (67 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 67 of 79

following elements, does not make a state-owned enterprise an instrumentality akin to a political subdivision of the Haitian government. Nor can the public perception element the only element to mention governmental functions answer whether factually and legally Haiti Teleco operated as an instrumentality of the Haitian government. Lastly, the determination of criminal culpability or public perception of Haiti Telecos status is wholly inadequate, especially where government function was never defined by the district court93 and the district court did not specifically instruct the jury that the Government had to prove that Esquenazi knew that Haiti Teleco was an instrumentality of the Haitian Government. Instead, the district court should have instructed the jury that the corrupt payment had to be made to a person the defendant knew or believed was a foreign official, like the district court did in United States v. Carson.94 And, as shown above, both the state appointment and public perception factors are especially inadequate where, as here, the legal requirements for government appointments were hence carried out namely, the change in corporate organization from a S.A. to a S.A.M.

Accord United States v. Gonzalez, 940 F.2d 1413, 1427 (11th Cir. 1991) ([T]erms which are within the common understanding of the jury need not be defined in the jury instructions) (emphasis added).
94

93

No. SACR 0900077JVS, DE 549 at 10-11 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2012).

54

Case: 11-15331

Date (68 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 68 of 79

IV.

THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED BY IMPROPERLY APPLYING THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES AS TO LEADERSHIP ROLE, PERJURY AND LOSS AMOUNT Fundamental sentencing law requires that the calculated guideline be

accurate. Failure to do so requires reversal.95 Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. 193, 201-203 (1992); United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2003). Over objection, Esquenazi received numerous sentencing guideline enhancements.96 Three of four objections raised here relate to findings of a leadership role, perjury, and loss amount. A. Esquenazi Did Not Exercise a Leadership Role

The Court imposed a four level increase finding Esquenazi to be very much in charge; the boss of Rodriguez [and] others; was in fact the leader of the organization; not just the President in name, but that he actually participated

Notwithstanding the harmless error rule discussed in United States v. Keene, 470 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2011), the reversal in the present matter pertains to incorrectly calculated guidelines concerning leadership, loss value and perjury. This Court cannot presume that a further reduction beneath the guideline would not occur if the trial court was incorrect in believing it was sentencing a leader or perjurer. Unlike Keene, there was no expression in this matter as to the impact on the sentence were it wrong on the calculations; and in United States v. Lane, 435 F. Appx 857, 858 (11th Cir. 2011), the issue concerned receipt of a thing of value under an admitted child pornography violation. These differences are fundamental and Esquenazi is entitled to reconsideration of the district courts improper guideline calculation. For purposes of these arguments, the Governments case as alleged is presumed, although not conceded as correct.
96

95

55

Case: 11-15331

Date (69 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 69 of 79

in may of the decisions that took place[.]97 Esquenazi challenges the role of leader, suggesting his true factual role was at most a manager or supervisor, entitling Esquenazi to a one level role reduction.98 Section 3B1.1(a) provides for a four level enhancement to the base offense level of any defendant who was an organizer or leader of a criminal activity that involved five or more participants or was otherwise extensive, and a three level enhancement for a manager or supervisor under the same circumstance. Section 3B1.1(b), cmt. n. 4. See Unites States v. Martinez, 584 F.3d 1022, 1028 (11th Cir. 2009); United States v. Yates, 990 F.2d 1179, 1182 (11th Cir. 1993). To receive a four level increase, there must be clear acts of leadership, United States v. Suarez, 313 F.3d 1287, 1299 (11th Cir. 2002) (defendants direction of others on the movement of cocaine); as compared with United States v. Zimmer, 299 F.3d 710 (8th Cir. 2002) (directing another on 30 to 36 occasions in cooking methamphetamine, for a three point manager/supervisor increase); see United States v. DeGovanni, 104 F.3d 43 (3d Cir. 1997) (supervisor of illegal activity, for a three level increase).

97 98

Dkt. 646 at 26.

No issue is raised regarding the number of participants or the otherwise extensive requirements.

56

Case: 11-15331

Date (70 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 70 of 79

But the district court here never adequately established over whom Esquenazi asserted any role, and what the role entailed.99 On the Haitian side, the primary players Grandison, Diaz and Forecand were all directed by the receivers of these bribes, namely, Messrs. Antoine and Duperval. Esquenazis relationship with the Haitian side, thus, was not one of control, leadership or management. United States v. Yates, 990 F.2d at 1182, citing United States v. Brown, 944 F.2d 1377, 1385 (7th Cir. 1991); (ruling that a buyer-seller relationship does not make or create an enhanced relationship). The Haitian side was controlled by Robert Antoine. Within Terra, two financial people, Rodriguez and Perez, and in-house counsel, Maes Dickey, were involved with Esquenazi. Esquenazi had an inherent employer-employee relationship which was interwoven with the alleged criminal conduct of bribery. The Governments case was that the business between Terra and Haiti Teleco was both legitimate and illegitimate. Perez, as Comptroller on his own volition developed a relationship with Antoine. In Perezs own words, I made a point of meeting Robert Antoine in an effortto grow the company, for recognition in the companymake more money

99

While there were others, these people played a primary role in this case.

57

Case: 11-15331

Date (71 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 71 of 79

in the company.100 Perez is the individual who discussed a side payment with Antoine, and Antoine instructed Perez on how side payments would be made.101 According to Perez, Esquenazi authorized a side payment if debt negotiations failed.102 In a display of the mutuality of involvement which evidences a lack of leadership, [Esquenazi] was happy, and both James Dickey and Carlos Rodriguez also congratulated me on a job well done following the Antoine meeting.103 Carlos Rodriguez was the Executive Vice-President of Terra, Manager of the Accounting Department, and an authorized signatory for the company.104 While Rodriguezs conduct can be viewed either in business or criminal terms, depending on ones perspective, there is simply a lack of evidence of Esquenazi directing Rodriguez in any criminal activity.105 Dickey, an unindicted co-conspirator, served as Terras in-house counsel and an officer of Terra. He provided legal advice, drafted and vetted contracts. Dickey

100 101 102 103 104 105

Dkt. 491 at 69. Id. 78-79. Id. at 77. Id. at 80. Dkt. 498 at 68, 78.

Rodriguez was the individual who signed the JDL Consulting agreement that James Dickey drafted. Dkt. 495 at 8-9. The testimony does not evidence that Esquenazi directed Dickey to draft this agreement, nor did it show that Esquenazi directed Rodriguez to sign it.

58

Case: 11-15331

Date (72 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 72 of 79

provided legal advice to Perez as to his activities with Robert Antoine.106 On request by Duperval, and as a favor/obligation to Teleco, Dickey created a corporation for Marguerite Grandison.107 This request was not unusual because Dickey had performed legal work for Teleco in the past.108 Id. At most, Esquenazi exercised management and supervision with more than five participants, where each conducted their own independent acts and judgment, both business-wise and in a criminal capacity. See United States v. Jennings, 599 F.3d 1241, 1253 (11th Cir. 2010); 3B1.1(b), cmt. n. 4. Notwithstanding the proper deference to the district court in this case, it clearly erred in applying the highest level of role enhancement. The court confused business activities and criminal conduct, and improperly found leadership over the Haitian participants.109 B. Esquenazi Did Not Obstruct Justice or Commit Perjury

Four elements must be present under 3C1.1 in order for a court to make a finding that a defendant perjured himself: 1) the testimony must be under oath or affirmation; 2) the testimony must be false; 3) the testimony must be material; and 4) the testimony must be given with the willful intent to provide false testimony
106 107 108 109

Dkt. 491 at 81. Dkt. 505 at 34-35. Id. Dkt. 646 at 25-26.

59

Case: 11-15331

Date (73 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 73 of 79

and not as a result of a mistake, confusion, or faulty memory. United States v. Dunnigan, 507 U.S. 87, 94 (1993); 18 U.S.C. 1621(1). In Dunnigan, the court held that: [I]t is preferable for a district court to address each element of the alleged perjury in a separate and clear finding. The district courts determination that enhancement is required is sufficient, however, if, as was the case here, the court makes a finding of an obstruction of, or impediment to, justice that encompasses all of the factual predicates for a finding of perjury. Id. at 95. Dunnigan also recognized that a defendants testimony may be truthful, even if rejected by a jury. Id. This issue concerns both the substantive finding by the district court and the manner in which the sentence was imposed.110 The Government identified certain specific areas of contested testimony: 1) whether documents were invoices (Government) or reports of minutes used (Esquenazi); 2) whether Esquenazi bribed Antoine; 3) the amount of time and questions associated with the agents interview;111 and 4) the destruction of documents.112

There was sufficient back and forth between counsel and the district court to alert the district court to the failure to be specific. See United States v. Gregg, 179 F.3d 1312, (11th Cir. 1999), citing United States v. Geffard, 87 F.3d 448, 453 (11th Cir. 1996).
111 112

110

This is not a material issue.

One last issue concerned financial conclusions marked in the PSIR, although this was never resolved. Dkt. 646 at 35-37.

60

Case: 11-15331

Date (74 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 74 of 79

Clearly, the bribery answer goes to the heart of the case, yet it is merely a conclusory statement underlying all the activities. Ultimately, there can be no argument that Esquenazis testimony opposes the Governments. Yet, the district court never addressed any factual issue, but repeatedly talked about Esquenazis demeanor and the jurys possible dislike of him.113 In fact, the district court prematurely (and improperly) announced its view of Esquenazis testimony in front of the jury: Prosecutor: youre sticking to your story . Esquenazi: May lightning strike me if Im lying. Court: Do you want to go stand somewhere else if youre going to say things like that? Im not suggesting it will Esquenazi: I think Im fine. Court: -- but I dont like people next to me saying that.114 Yet, when it came time to sentence Esquenazi, at no place did the district court find the testimony to be false, material or mistaken or confused. As close as the district court came to ruling was referring to the Governments factual examples. The district court said, But in this case, were not talking about one. Were not talking about two. Were talking about a bunch. And any one of those things might not be the one thing[.] But then spoke to Esquenazis demeanor,
113 114

Dkt. 646 at 28-29. Dkt. 505 at 50.

61

Case: 11-15331

Date (75 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 75 of 79

And lest you think I personally dislike Mr. Esquenazi, he reminds me almost 100 percent of my very best friend[.]115 Esquenazis protestation of his innocence, notwithstanding the jury verdict, Dunnigan, is simply insufficient to amount to a finding of perjury. C. The Amount of Loss Should Have Been Measured by the Personal Benefit to Esquenazi, Not Terra

A careful analysis of the district courts 2C1.1 findings reveal the district courts failure to distinguish the benefits received by the corporation (Terra) and the individual employee (Esquenazi), who acted on behalf of the corporation. Because Esquenazi, not Terra, was on trial, Esquenazis own personal benefit should have been the determinative factor.116 In United States v. Anderson, 517 F.3d 953 (7th Cir. 2008), the court discussed how to best assess the value received and the individual benefit derived by Anderson from the two properties that were developed as a result of bribes paid, holding we must now calculate the benefit Anderson derived from these two properties, id. at 964, notwithstanding that Anderson acted through his company.

115 116

Dkt. 646, at 35.

Although this ground was not specifically raised at sentencing, the valuation was raised and argued. Dkt. 646 at 8-12.

62

Case: 11-15331

Date (76 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 76 of 79

Moreover, in United States v. DeVegter, 439 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 2006), this Court faced the question of the proper valuation of the benefit,117 holding that a companys year-end bonus to employees could not be subtracted as a direct cost from the net benefits used to calculate the sentence. Footnote 2 of DeVegter reads [t]he appropriate measure of the improper benefit should be the benefit to Lazard (the company), as opposed to merely any benefit directly attributable to Poirier (the defendant). This is dicta, as it was not an issue in DeVegter. None of the three cases cited by DeVegter are Eleventh Circuit cases, and all use a different guideline, Section 2B4.1. In United States v. Cohen, 171 F.3d 796 (3d Cir. 1999), the salesman for a food company paid bribes to customers and meat managers to induce them to purchase from the company. Cohen held that the improper benefit refers to the net value accruing to the entity on whose behalf the individual paid the bribe. This case is in direct conflict with the Seventh Circuits opinion of Anderson and is the only case that directly addresses this question. The other two cases in footnote 2 are not on point. See United States v. Landers, 68 F.3d 882, 884 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Ziglin, 964 F.2d 756, 758 (8th Cir. 1992).

It should be noted at the outset that a different statute, 18 U.S.C. 1343, was charged in DeVegter, leading to the use of the Sentencing Guidelines, 2B4.1.

117

63

Case: 11-15331

Date (77 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 77 of 79

Per section 2C1.1, with the accurate value of Esquenazis personal benefit unclear, the guideline requires the amount of the bribe; therefore, the offense level should drop by two points (level 14). CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, this Court should direct a judgment of acquittal in favor of Esquenazi, or, in the alternative, reverse his convictions and remand for a new trial or for resentencing. Respectfully submitted this 9th day of May, 2012. /s/ Michael A. Sink Michael A. Sink (CO Bar #36064) T. Markus Funk, (CO Bar #43500) Perkins Coie LLP 1900 Sixteenth Street, Suite 1400 Denver, CO 80202-5255 Phone: (303) 291-2300 Fax: (303) 291-2400 Email: msink@perkinscoie.com Michael J. Rosen, Esq. Fla. Bar No.: 183719 MICHAEL J. ROSEN, P.A. 2937 SW 27th Avenue, Suite 101 Miami, Florida 33133 Tel: 305-446-6116 Fax: Michael Rosen@305-446-6150 Email: mjr@mjrosenlaw.com Attorneys for Appellant, Joel Esquenazi

64

Case: 11-15331

Date (78 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 78 of 79

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE This brief complies with the type-volume limitation of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(7)(B) because: 1. This brief contains 13,851words, excluding the parts of the brief

exempted by Fed.R.App.P. 32(a)(7)(B)(iii). 2. This brief complies with the typeface requirements of Fed.R.App.P.

32(a)(5) and the type style requirements of Fed.R.App.P. 32(a)(6) because: a. this brief has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface

using WordXP in Times New Roman 14 pt.

65

Case: 11-15331

Date (79 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 79 of 79

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by via Electronic Filing this 9th day of May, 2012, to the following:
Aurora Fagan Richard J. Diaz David W. Simon Kenneth Bruce Winer Anne Ruth Schultz Kathleen Mary Salyer Lauren Lisette Valiente Rhonda Anne Anderson Kirby A. Heller Pamela L. Johnston Jaime B. Guerrero

With a copy mailed to the following:

Wifredo A. Ferrer U.S. Attorneys Office 99 NE 4TH ST STE 521 MIAMI, FL 33132 Arturo Virgilio Hernandez Attorney at Law 2937 SW 27TH AVE STE 101 MIAMI, FL 33133-3772 G. Michael Halfenger Foley & Lardner, LLP 777 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3800 MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5306 Daren Grove U.S. Attorneys Office 99 NE 4TH ST STE 521 MIAMI, FL 33132 James F. Cirincione Foley & Lardner, LLP 777 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3800 MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5306 James M. Koukios U.S. Attorneys Office 99 NE 4TH ST STE 521 MIAMI, FL 33132 Nicola J. Mrazek US Department of Justice - Criminal Division 1400 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 600 WASHINGTON, DC 20005-2107

/s/ Michael A. Sink Michael A. Sink (CO Bar #36064) T. Markus Funk, (CO Bar #43500) Perkins Coie LLP 1900 Sixteenth Street, Suite 1400 Denver, CO 80202-5255 Phone: (303) 291-2300 Fax: (303) 291-2400 Email: msink@perkinscoie.com mfunk@perkinscoie.com

66

Case: 11-15331

Date (80 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345)

Page: 1 of 266

DOCKET SHEET

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd

Page 1 of 96

Case: 11-15331 Date (81 of 05/09/2012 Page: 2 of 266 Filed: 345) APPEAL,BNDDUTY,BNDRLD,BNDWCT,CMM,INTERPRETER

U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (Miami) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:09-cr-21010-JEM All Defendants

Case title: USA v. Esquenazi et al Assigned to: Judge Jose E. Martinez Appeals court case number: 11-15331C USCA Defendant (1) Joel Esquenazi TERMINATED: 10/26/2011

Date Filed: 12/04/2009

represented by Michael James Rosen Michael J. Rosen 2937 SW 27 Avenue Suite 101 Miami, FL 33133 305-446-6116 Fax: 305-446-6150 Email: mjr@mjrosenlaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Richard John Diaz 3127 Ponce De Leon Boulevard Coral Gables, FL 33134-6816 305-444-7181 Fax: 444-8178 Email: Rick@rjdpa.com TERMINATED: 10/13/2011 Designation: Retained

Pending Counts 18:371.F CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES (1) 15:78D.F FOREIGN SECURITIES EXCHANGES -VIOLATION OF FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (2-8)

Disposition Imprisonment: 60 months, to be served concurrently to each other. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,000. Imprisonment: 60 months, to be served concurrently to each other. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,000.

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 18:1956-4999.F MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACYFRAUD, OTHER (9) Date (82 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345) Page: 3 of 266

Page 2 of 96

Imprisonment: 120 months to be served concurrently to each other and consecutively to Counts 1 through 8. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,000. Imprisonment: 120 months to be served concurrently to each other and consecutively to Counts 1 through 8. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,000.

18:1956-7477.F LAUNDERING OF MONETARY INSTRUMENTS (10-21)

Highest Offense Level (Opening) Felony Terminated Counts None Highest Offense Level (Terminated) None Complaints None Assigned to: Judge Jose E. Martinez Referred to: Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube Appeals court case number: 11-15331C USCA Defendant (2) Carlos Rodriguez TERMINATED: 10/26/2011 represented by Arturo V. Hernandez Arturo V. Hernandez 2937 S.W. 27th Avenue Suite 101 Miami, FL 33133 305-443-7527 Fax: 446-6150 Email: avhlaw@bellsouth.net LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Lauren Lisette Valiente Disposition Disposition

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (83 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345) Page: 4 of 266

Page 3 of 96

Foley & Lardner 100 N Tampa Street Suite 2700 PO Box 3391 Tampa, FL 33601-3391 813-229-2300 Fax: 813-221-4210 Email: lvaliente@foley.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Rhonda Anne Anderson Rhonda A. Anderson PA 2655 S LeJeune Road Suite 540 Coral Gables, FL 33134 305-567-3004 Fax: 305-476-9837 Email: randersonlaw@gmail.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Richard John Diaz (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Pending Counts 18:371.F CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES (1) Disposition Imprisonment: 60 months, all to be served concurrently. Surrender date 11/30/11 by 2:00 p.m. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,00. Imprisonment: 60 months, all to be served concurrently. Surrender date 11/30/11 by 2:00 p.m. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,00. Imprisonment: 24 months, all to be served concurrently. Surrender date 11/30/11 by 2:00 p.m. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,00. Imprisonment: 24 months, all to be served concurrently. Surrender date 11/30/11 by 2:00 p.m. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution:

15:78D.F FOREIGN SECURITIES EXCHANGES -VIOLATION OF FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (2-8) 18:1956-4999.F MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACYFRAUD, OTHER (9)

18:1956-7477.F LAUNDERING OF MONETARY INSTRUMENTS (10-21)

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (84 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345) Page: 5 of 266

Page 4 of 96

2,200,00. Highest Offense Level (Opening) Felony Terminated Counts None Highest Offense Level (Terminated) None Complaints None Assigned to: Judge Jose E. Martinez Defendant (3) Robert Antoine Prisoner ID: 86708-004 YOB: 1948; ENGLISH TERMINATED: 06/09/2010 represented by Dennis Gary Kainen Weisberg & Kainen 1401 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131-3554 305-374-5544 Fax: 358-8565 Email: dennis@weisbergandkainen.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Pending Counts 18:1956-4999.F MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACYFRAUD, OTHER (9) Highest Offense Level (Opening) Felony Terminated Counts None Highest Offense Level (Terminated) None Disposition Disposition Imprisonment for a term of 48 months followed by a term of 3 years Supervised Release Disposition Disposition

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Complaints None Assigned to: Judge Jose E. Martinez Referred to: Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton Defendant (4) Jean Rene Duperval Prisoner ID: 82799-004 YOB: 1966; ENGLISH Date (85 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345) Page: 6 of 266

Page 5 of 96

Disposition

represented by Courtney Montiero 25 SE 2nd Ave, Suite 1105 Miami, FL 33131 7864478242 Email: cmontiero@gmail.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained John Edwin Bergendahl Law Offices of John E. Bergendahl Ingraham Building 25 S.E. 2nd Avenue Suite 1105 Miami, FL 33131 305-536-2168 Fax: 305-536-2170 Email: vaneri17@bellsouth.net LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Jan Christopher Smith , II Federal Public Defender's Office 150 W Flagler Street Miami, FL 33130-1556 305-530-7000 Fax: 530-7120 Email: jan_smith@fd.org TERMINATED: 01/26/2012 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Joseph David Wentworth Beeler Joseph Beeler PA 800 Brickell Avenue Penthouse II Miami, FL 33131-2969 305-372-5110 Fax: 305-372-5176 Email: jb@jbeelerlaw.com

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (86 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345) Page: 7 of 266

Page 6 of 96

TERMINATED: 01/26/2012 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Temporary Pending Counts 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING - CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, OTHER (8s-9s) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACY (8ss-9ss) 18:1956-4999.F MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACYFRAUD, OTHER (9) 18:1956-7477.F LAUNDERING OF MONETARY INSTRUMENTS (10-21) LAUNDERING OF MONETARY INSTRUMENTS (10s-28s) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING (10ss-28ss) Highest Offense Level (Opening) Felony Terminated Counts None Highest Offense Level (Terminated) None Complaints None Assigned to: Judge Jose E. Martinez Defendant (5) Marguerite Grandison TERMINATED: 02/27/2012 represented by Roderick Darrell Vereen Brinkley Henrys & Lewis Disposition Disposition Disposition

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (87 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345) Page: 8 of 266

Page 7 of 96

4770 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1200 Miami, FL 33131 305-576-1201 Fax: 576-2304 Email: Vereen2469@aol.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained David Jonathon Joffe David J. Joffe One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-723-0007 Fax: 723-0033 Email: DavidJJoffe@aol.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Temporary Pending Counts None Highest Offense Level (Opening) None Terminated Counts 18:371.F CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES (1) 15:78D.F FOREIGN SECURITIES EXCHANGES -VIOLATION OF FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (2-8) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING - CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, OTHER (8s-9s) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACY (8ss-9ss) 18:1956-4999.F MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACYFRAUD, OTHER Disposition Sealed Disposition

Sealed

Sealed

Sealed

Sealed

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 (9) 18:1956-7477.F LAUNDERING OF MONETARY INSTRUMENTS (10-21) LAUNDERING OF MONETARY INSTRUMENTS (10s-28s) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING (10ss-28ss) Highest Offense Level (Terminated) Felony Complaints None Assigned to: Judge Jose E. Martinez Referred to: Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube Defendant (6) Washington Vasconez Cruz Pending Counts 18:371.F- CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES (1) 18:371.F- CONSPIRACY (1s) 15:78D.F-FOREIGN SECURITIES EXCHANGES- VIOLATIONS OF THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (2-7) 15:78D.F- VIOLATIONS OF THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (2s-7s) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING - CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, OTHER (8) Disposition Disposition Sealed Date (88 of 05/09/2012 Filed: 345) Page: 9 of 266

Page 8 of 96

Sealed

Sealed

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACY (8s) LAUNDERING OF MONETARY INSTRUMENTS (10-28) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING (10s-28s) Highest Offense Level (Opening) Felony Terminated Counts None Highest Offense Level (Terminated) None Complaints None Assigned to: Judge Jose E. Martinez Referred to: Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube Defendant (7) Amadeus Richers Pending Counts 18:371.F- CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES (1) 18:371.F- CONSPIRACY (1s) 15:78D.F-FOREIGN SECURITIES EXCHANGES- VIOLATIONS OF THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (2-7) 15:78D.F- VIOLATIONS OF THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT Disposition Disposition Disposition Date Filed: 05/09/2012 (89 of 345) Page: 10 of 266

Page 9 of 96

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 (2s-7s) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING - CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, OTHER (8) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACY (8s) LAUNDERING OF MONETARY INSTRUMENTS (10-28) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING (10s-28s) Highest Offense Level (Opening) Felony Terminated Counts None Highest Offense Level (Terminated) None Complaints None Assigned to: Judge Jose E. Martinez Referred to: Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube Appeals court case number: 12-11684C USCA Defendant (8) Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. TERMINATED: 02/24/2012 Disposition Disposition Date Filed: 05/09/2012 (90 of 345) Page: 11 of 266

Page 10 of 96

represented by Joel Hirschhorn Hirschhorn & Bieber 550 Biltmore Way Penthouse Three A Coral Gables, FL 33134 305-445-5320 Fax: 446-1766 Email: JHirschhorn@aquitall.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: 05/09/2012 (91 of 345) Page: 12 of 266

Page 11 of 96

Designation: Retained Jake Matthew Greenberg Hirschhorn & Bieber, P.A. 550 Biltmore Way Penthouse Three A Miami, FL 33134 (305) 445-5320 Fax: (305) 446-1766 Email: JGreenberg@aquitall.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Pending Counts None Highest Offense Level (Opening) None Terminated Counts 18:371.F- CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES (1) 18:371.F- CONSPIRACY (1s) 15:78D.F-FOREIGN SECURITIES EXCHANGES- VIOLATIONS OF THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (2-7) 15:78D.F- VIOLATIONS OF THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (2s-7s) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING - CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, OTHER (8) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACY (8s) LAUNDERING OF MONETARY INSTRUMENTS (10-28) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY Disposition Dismissed Dismissed Disposition

Dismissed

Dismissed

Dismissed

Dismissed

Dismissed

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 LAUNDERING (10s-28s) Highest Offense Level (Terminated) Felony Complaints None Assigned to: Judge Jose E. Martinez Referred to: Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube Defendant (9) Patrick Joseph Prisoner ID: 96996-004 YOB: 1961 Disposition Date Filed: 05/09/2012 (92 of 345) Page: 13 of 266

Page 12 of 96

Dismissed

represented by Guy Alan Lewis Lewis Tein 3059 Grand Avenue Suite 340 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 305-442-1101 Fax: 442-6744 Email: lewis@lewistein.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Ivan S. Fisher 125 East 50th Street Suite 1201 New York, NY 10022 212-517-5000 Email: ivanfisher@ivanfisher.com PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Kathryn Ashley Meyers Lewis Tein 3059 Grand Avenue Suite 340 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 305-442-1101 Fax: 442-6744 Email: meyers@lewistein.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Paul A. Calli

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: 05/09/2012 (93 of 345) Page: 14 of 266

Page 13 of 96

Carlton Fields 4000 International Place 100 S.E. 2nd Street Miami, FL 33131 305-530-0050 Fax: 305-530-0055 Email: pcalli@carltonfields.com TERMINATED: 09/14/2011 Designation: Retained Richard Okyere Dansoh Richard O. Dansoh 501 NE 1 Avenue Suite 301 Miami, FL 33132 305-573-4444 Fax: 305-238-5000 Email: dansohlawfirm@gmail.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Pending Counts 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING - CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, OTHER (8) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACY (8s) Highest Offense Level (Opening) Felony Terminated Counts None Highest Offense Level (Terminated) None Complaints None Assigned to: Judge Jose E. Martinez Referred to: Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube Disposition Disposition Disposition

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Defendant (10) Cecilia Zurita Pending Counts 18:371.F- CONSPIRACY (1) 15:78D.F- VIOLATIONS OF THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (4-7) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING CONSPIRACY (8) 18:1956-4999.F- MONEY LAUNDERING (10-28) Highest Offense Level (Opening) Felony Terminated Counts None Highest Offense Level (Terminated) None Complaints None Disposition Disposition Disposition Date Filed: 05/09/2012 (94 of 345) Page: 15 of 266

Page 14 of 96

Garnishee AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company

Plaintiff USA represented by Kevin B. Gerrity US Department of Justice Asset Forfeiture & Money Laundering 1400 New York Avenue NW Suite 10100 Washington, DC 20530 202-353-8915

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: 05/09/2012 (95 of 345) Page: 16 of 266

Page 15 of 96

Fax: 202-616-2547 Email: kevin.gerrity@usdoj.gov TERMINATED: 06/27/2011 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Nicola J. Mrazek U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division, Fraud Section 1400 New York Avenue NW Bond Building 4th Floor Washington, DC 20005 Email: Nicola.Mrazek@usdoj.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Aurora Fagan United States Attorney's Office 99 NE 4 Street Miami, FL 33132 305-961-9185 Fax: 305-536-7213 Email: aurora.fagan@usdoj.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Daniel S. Kahn US Attorney's Office Washington, DC 202.616.3434 Email: Daniel.Kahn@usdoj.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Daren Grove United States Attorney's Office, SDFL 99 NE 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 305-961-9294 Email: daren.grove@usdoj.gov TERMINATED: 02/10/2012 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED James M Koukios Department of Justice Fraud Section, Criminal Division 1400 New York Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20009 202-616-5535 Fax: (202) 514-7021 Email: james.koukios@usdoj.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: 05/09/2012 (96 of 345) Page: 17 of 266

Page 16 of 96

Karen E Moore United States Attorney's Office 99 NE 4 Street 7th Floor Miami, FL 33132 305-961-9030 Fax: 536-4089 Email: karen.moore@usdoj.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Maureen Donlan United States Attorney's Office 99 NE 4 Street Miami, FL 33132 305-961-9334 Fax: 305-530-7139 Email: maureen.donlan@usdoj.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Date Filed 12/04/2009 # 1 Docket Text MOTION to Seal by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 12/21/2009 (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) ORDER granting 1 Motion to Seal as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2), Robert Antoine (3), Jean Rene Duperval (4), Marguerite Grandison (5). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter R. Palermo on 12/4/2009. (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) INDICTMENT as to Joel Esquenazi (1) count(s) 1, 2-8, 9, 10-21, Carlos Rodriguez (2) count(s) 1, 2-8, 9, 10-21, Robert Antoine (3) count(s) 9, Jean Rene Duperval (4) count(s) 9, 10-21, Marguerite Grandison (5) count(s) 1, 28, 9, 10-21 AND FORFEITURE. (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) Arrest of Jean Rene Duperval (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) 9 ORDER UNSEALING CASE as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 12/7/2009. (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube: Initial Appearance as to Carlos Rodriguez held on 12/7/2009. Case Unsealed. (Digital 14:55:54.) (Tape #09RLD-17 and 18-1.) (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) Order on Initial Appearance as to Carlos Rodriguez for proceeding held on 12/7/2009. Attorney Arturo V. Hernandez for Carlos Rodriguez added for the defendant. Special Conditions: Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;Report to Pretrial Services as directed;Maintain or actively seek full-time employment;May travel to and from SD/FL and must notify Pretrial Services of travel plans before leaving and upon

12/04/2009

12/04/2009

12/04/2009 12/07/2009

12/07/2009

10

12/07/2009

11

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: 05/09/2012 (97 of 345) Page: 18 of 266

Page 17 of 96

return;Comply with additional conditions of bond - Electronic Monitoring paid by defendant. Bond as to Carlos Rodriguez (2) $50,000 CSB w/Nebbia, $100,000 10% w/Nebbia and $100,000 PSB co-signed by co-owner of home. Bond to be posted within 24 hours. Tape #09RLD-17 and 18-1 (Digital 14:55:54.) Arraignment set for 1/5/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Report Re: Counsel Hearing set for 1/5/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 12/7/2009. (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) 12/07/2009 12/07/2009 12 13 Report Commencing Criminal Action as to Jean Rene Duperval - DOB: **/**/1966 Prisoner #: 82799-004 (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube: Initial Appearance as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 12/7/2009 (Digital 14:18:44.) (Tape #09RLD-17 and 18-1.) (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) Order on Initial Appearance as to Jean Rene Duperval for proceeding held on 12/7/2009. Bond as to Jean Rene Duperval (4) temporary pretrial detention. Tape #09RLD-17 and 18-1 (Digital 14:18:44.) Arraignment set for 12/14/2009 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Detention Hearing set for 12/14/2009 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Report Re: Counsel Hearing set for 12/14/2009 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 12/7/2009. (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube: Initial Appearance as to Marguerite Grandison held on 12/7/2009 (Digital 14:18:44.) (Tape #09RLD-17 and 18-1.) (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) Order on Initial Appearance as to Marguerite Grandison for proceeding held on 12/7/2009. Attorney David Jonathon Joffe for Marguerite Grandison added for the defendant. Special Conditions: Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;Report to Pretrial Services as directed;Comply with additional conditions of bond - Electronic monitoring pad by defendant; Bond as to Marguerite Grandison (5) $50,000 CSB w/Nebbia to be posted within 48 hours. Tape #09RLD-17 and 18-1 (Digital 14:18:44.) Arraignment set for 1/5/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Report Re: Counsel Hearing set for 1/5/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 12/7/2009. (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) NOTICE OF TEMPORARY ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: David Jonathon Joffe appearing for Marguerite Grandison (gm1) (Entered: 12/08/2009) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Nicola J. Mrazek appearing for USA. (Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 12/09/2009) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Kevin B. Gerrity appearing for USA. (Gerrity, Kevin) (Entered: 12/09/2009) $50,000.00 CSB Bond Entered as to Marguerite Grandison. Approved by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube. Special Conditions: Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;Report to Pretrial

12/07/2009

14

12/07/2009

15

12/07/2009

16

12/07/2009 12/09/2009 12/09/2009 12/10/2009

17 18 19 20

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: 05/09/2012 (98 of 345) Page: 19 of 266

Page 18 of 96

Services as directed and comply with additional conditions of bond: electronic monitoring paid for by the defendant based on his ability to pay. (cg1) (Entered: 12/10/2009) 12/12/2009 12/14/2009 12/14/2009 21 22 Arrest of Robert Antoine (gm1) (Entered: 12/16/2009) STIPULATION Regarding Nebbia by Carlos Rodriguez (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 12/14/2009) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Arturo V. Hernandez appearing for Carlos Rodriguez as Trial Counsel (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 12/14/2009) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff: Status Conference as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 12/14/2009, in re arraignment, pretrial detention and report re csl ( Arraignment reset for 1/5/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate., Detention Hearing reset for 12/30/2009 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate., Report Re: Counsel Hearing reset for 12/30/2009 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate.) (Digital 10:17:47 & 10:22:17.) (Tape #09G-70-289.) (nf) (Entered: 12/14/2009) Report Commencing Criminal Action as to Robert Antoine - DOB: **/**/1948 Prisoner #: 86708-004 (gm1) (Entered: 12/16/2009) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff: Initial Appearance as to Robert Antoine held on 12/14/2009 (Digital 14:34:42 / 14:45:00.) (Tape #09G-72-89 and 175.) (gm1) (Entered: 12/16/2009) Order on Initial Appearance as to Robert Antoine for proceeding held on 12/14/2009. Attorney Dennis Gary Kainen for Robert Antoine added for the defendant. Bond as to Robert Antoine (3) $1,000,000 10% w/Nebbia. Defendant to deposit $100,000 - conditions to be set when nebbia satisfied. Tape #09G-72-89 and 175 (Digital 14:34:42 / 14:45:00.) Arraignment set for 12/28/2009 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Report Re: Counsel Hearing set for 12/18/2009 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Signed by Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff on 12/14/2009. (gm1) (Entered: 12/16/2009) Arrest Warrant returned executed on 12/12/09 as to Robert Antoine re 6 Arrest Warrant Issued (tp) (Entered: 12/16/2009) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff: Nebbia Hearing as to Robert Antoine held on 12/17/2009. Bond Hearing as to Robert Antoine held on 12/17/2009. Nebbia proffer provided on the record. Defendant's daughter, Daphne Antoine, sworn and testified. Government raises its concerns stated on the record re source of some of the funds in proffer. Court accepts Nebbia proffer by defense. Nebbia Satisfied. Special Conditions: Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;Report to Pretrial Services as directed;Comply with additional conditions of bond - Home Confinement/Electronic Monitoring paid by defendant; Travel restricted to SD/FL. Bond set as to Robert Antoine

12/14/2009

23

12/14/2009 12/14/2009

24 25

12/14/2009

26

12/16/2009 12/17/2009

27 28

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: 05/09/2012 (99 of 345) Page: 20 of 266

Page 19 of 96

(3) $1,000,000 10%. ( Arraignment set for 1/5/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate., Report Re: Counsel Hearing set for 1/5/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate.) (Digital 14:58:36 / 15:29:43.) (Tape #09G-77.) (gm1) (Entered: 12/18/2009) 12/17/2009 29 $1,000,000.00 10% PSB Bond Entered as to Robert Antoine Receipt # 233417 through 233429. Approved by Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff Special Conditions: Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;Report to Pretrial Services as directed;Home Confinement Program/Electronic Monitoring paid for by the defendant with Home Detention except for medical needs, court appearances, attorney visits, religious services with advance notice to pretrial services.Comply with additional conditions of bond - Travel restricted to SD/FL; All standard conditions. (gm1) BOND CONDITIONS MODIFIED 98 on 2/4/2010 (lw1). (Entered: 12/18/2009) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff: Status Conference as to Robert Antoine held on 12/18/2009, Report Re: Counsel Hearing reset for 1/5/2010 at 10:00 am in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. (Digital 10:30:00.) (Tape #09-G-78.) (lcs) (Entered: 12/21/2009) Rule 5(c)(3)/ Rule 40 Documents received from Central District of California by Joel Esquenazi (tp) (Entered: 12/22/2009) ORDER CLARIFYING BOND CONDITIONS as to Marguerite Grandison. The following bond condition is hereby clarified: 1) Defendant Grandison's curfew shall be from 10:00 p.m. to 6:30 a.m.; 2) All other terms and conditions of the bond previously imposed by this Court shall remain in full force and effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 12/23/2009. (cg1) (Entered: 12/23/2009) Arrest Warrant returned executed on 12/07/09 as to Carlos Rodriguez re 5 Arrest Warrant Issued (tp) (Entered: 12/28/2009) Arrest Warrant returned executed on 12/06/09 as to Jean Rene Duperval re 7 Arrest Warrant Issued (tp) (Entered: 12/28/2009) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Roderick Darrell Vereen appearing for Marguerite Grandison (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 12/28/2009) NOTICE OF TEMPORARY ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Joseph David Wentworth Beeler appearing for Jean Rene Duperval (Beeler, Joseph David) (Entered: 12/30/2009) AFFIDAVIT by Jean Rene Duperval signed by : sixteen persons. (Beeler, Joseph David) (Entered: 12/30/2009) PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM in opposition to Government's motion for pretrial detention by Jean Rene Duperval (Beeler, Joseph David) (Entered: 12/30/2009) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T.

12/18/2009

30

12/21/2009 12/23/2009

31 32

12/23/2009 12/23/2009 12/28/2009

34 35 33

12/30/2009

36

12/30/2009 12/30/2009

37 38

12/30/2009

39

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (100 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 21 of 266

Page 20 of 96

Brown: Detention Hearing as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 12/30/2009. Defendant held in Temporary Pretrial Detention. Report Re: Counsel Hearing as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 12/30/2009. Matter continued. (Arraignment continued to 1/6/2010 at 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown., Report Re: Counsel Hearing continued to 1/6/2010 at 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown.) (Digital 14:27:52.) (Tape #09D-56.) (lw1) (Entered: 01/04/2010) 12/30/2009 40 Defendant's EXHIBIT LIST with attached Deft's Exhibit 1 as to Jean Rene Duperval from 12/30/09 Hearing 39 before Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown. (lw1) (Entered: 01/04/2010) MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Electronic Monitoring Schedule by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 1/21/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 01/04/2010) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber: Status Conference re report re counsel and arraignment as to Robert Antoine held on 1/5/2010. Counsel requests continuance. ( Arraignment RESET for 1/19/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Report Re: Counsel Hearing RESET for 1/19/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate.) (Digital 10:09:59.) (Tape #10BLG-1.) (gm1) (Entered: 01/05/2010) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber: Arraignment as to Marguerite Grandison (5) Count 1,2-8,9,10-21 held on 1/5/2010. Reading of Inditment wavied. Not Guilty plea entered Jury trial demanded. SDO requested. Bond set at $50K CBS with nebbia. (Digital 10:04:39.) (Tape #10-BLG-1.) (ag) (Entered: 01/05/2010) ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to counts Marguerite Grandison (5) Count 1,2-8,9,10-21. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held on 1/5/2010 before Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber. Defense Counsel Roderick D. Vereen, Attorney.Bond set/continued $50K CBS with nebbia. Tape #10-BLG-1 (Digital 10:04:39.) (ag) (Entered: 01/05/2010) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber: Arraignment as to Carlos Rodriguez (2) Count 1,2-8,9,10-21 held on 1/5/2010, Motion Hearing as to Carlos Rodriguez held on 1/5/2010 re 41 GRANTING MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Electronic Monitoring Schedule filed by Carlos Rodriguez (Digital 10:08:33.) (Tape #10-BLG-1.) (ag) (Entered: 01/05/2010) ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to counts Carlos Rodriguez (2) Count 1,2-8,9,10-21. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held on 1/5/2010 before Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber. Arturo Hernandez, Defense Counsel for Defendant Carlos Rodriguez. Tape #10-BLG-1 (Digital 10:08:33.) (ag) (Entered: 01/05/2010) ORDER as to Carlos Rodriguez re 41 GRANTING MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release re:Electronic Monitoring Schedule filed by Carlos

01/04/2010

41

01/05/2010

42

01/05/2010

43

01/05/2010

44

01/05/2010

45

01/05/2010

46

01/05/2010

47

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (101 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 22 of 266

Page 21 of 96

Rodriguez. The Defendant's daily home detention schedule is modified to 7:00AM to 11:00PM, including weekends. Further, the defendant be allowed to travel within the State of Florida with advance notice to his electronic monitoring supervisor, Torres. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber on 1/5/2010. (ag) (Entered: 01/05/2010) 01/05/2010 48 STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER as to Carlos Rodriguez, Marguerite Grandison. All motions concerning matters not covered by this order must be filed within 28 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber on 1/5/2010. (ag) (Entered: 01/05/2010) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown: Bond Hearing as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 1/6/2010, Bond set as to Jean Rene Duperval (4) $525K PSB, $75K 10% Nebbia & $400K PSB (Digital 10:09:10.) (Tape #10-D-1.) (sl) (Entered: 01/07/2010) AMENDED Minute Entry for proceedings held before Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown: Bond Hearing as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 1/6/2010 (Amended to delete education requirement) (Digital 10:09:10.) (Tape #10-D1.) (sl) (Entered: 01/07/2010) SECOND AMENDED Minute Entry for proceedings held before Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown: Detention Hearing as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 1/6/2010 (amended to add condition: surrender travel documents (Digital 10:09:10.) (Tape #10-D-1.) (sl) (Entered: 01/14/2010) MOTION to transfer related case and notice of related case by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 1/25/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 01/07/2010) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Richard John Diaz appearing for Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 01/11/2010) Order on Initial Appearance as to Joel Esquenazi for proceeding held on 1/11/2010 Special Conditions: Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;Report to Pretrial Services as directed;Maintain or actively seek full-time employment;Avoid all contact with victims of or witnesses to the crimes charged, except through counsel;Curfew from 11:00 pm to 7:00 amComply with additional conditions of bondto reside at present address as to Joel Esquenazi (1) $150,000 CSB continued from other district. Arraignment held. Tape #10-FX-3-1212 (Digital 13:4314.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton on 1/11/2010. (tp) (Entered: 01/12/2010) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Richard John Diaz appearing for Joel Esquenazi (tp) (Entered: 01/12/2010) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton: Initial Appearance as to Joel Esquenazi held on 1/11/2010 (Digital 13:43:14.) (Tape #10-FX-3.) (sl) (Entered: 01/12/2010) ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to

01/06/2010

49

01/06/2010

50

01/06/2010

63

01/07/2010

51

01/11/2010 01/11/2010

52 53

01/11/2010 01/11/2010

54 58

01/12/2010

55

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (102 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 23 of 266

Page 22 of 96

counts Joel Esquenazi (1) Count 1,2-8,9,10-21. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held on 1/12/2010 before Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton. Tape #10-FX-3-1212 (Digital 13:43:14.) (tp) (Entered: 01/12/2010) 01/12/2010 56 STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER as to Joel Esquenazi. All motions concerning matters not covered by this order must be filed within 28 days of this order.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton on 1/11/2010. (tp) (Entered: 01/12/2010) $150,000 CSB Bond Entered as to Joel Esquenazi Approved by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton Special Conditions: Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;Report to Pretrial Services as directed;Maintain or actively seek full-time employment;Avoid all contact with victims of or witnesses to the crimes charged, except through counsel;Home Confinement Program with curfew from 11:00 pm to 7:00 am (tp) (Entered: 01/12/2010) STIPULATION Regarding Nebbia by Jean Rene Duperval (Beeler, Joseph David) (Entered: 01/12/2010) APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 01/13/2010) ORDER granting 51 Motion to transfer related case as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2), Robert Antoine (3), Jean Rene Duperval (4), Marguerite Grandison (5). Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 1/14/2010. (im) (Entered: 01/14/2010) $100,000 10% PSB Bond Entered as to Carlos Rodriguez Receipt # 233405. Approved by Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley (sl) (Entered: 01/14/2010) Case as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison transferred to Judge Jose E. Martinez per Order at DE 61 . Judge Marcia G. Cooke no longer assigned to the case. (bb) (Entered: 01/15/2010) MOTION for Protective Order by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 2/1/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 01/15/2010) $75,000 10% PSB Bond Entered as to Jean Rene Duperval Receipt # 233450 and 233451. Approved by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton (sl) (Entered: 01/18/2010) $525,000 PSB Bond Entered as to Jean Rene Duperval Approved by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton (sl) (Entered: 01/18/2010) NEBBIA PROFFER by Jean Rene Duperval (sl) (Entered: 01/18/2010) ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison to Judge Jose E. Martinez for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 1/15/10.. Signed

01/12/2010

57

01/12/2010 01/13/2010 01/14/2010

59 60 61

01/14/2010 01/14/2010

62 64

01/15/2010

65

01/15/2010

66

01/15/2010 01/15/2010 01/15/2010

67 68 69

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (103 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 24 of 266

Page 23 of 96

by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 1/14/2010. (tp) (Entered: 01/19/2010) 01/19/2010 70 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan: Status re Report re Counsel and Arraignment as to Robert Antoine held on 1/19/2010, ( Arraignment reset for 2/9/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate., Report Re: Counsel Hearing reset for 2/9/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate.) (Digital 10:26:38.) (Tape #10-A-4.) (ks) (Entered: 01/19/2010) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan: Status re Report re Counsel and Arraignment as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 1/19/2010, ( Arraignment reset for 2/9/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan., Report Re: Counsel Hearing reset for 2/9/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate.) (Digital 10:27:18.) (Tape #10-A-4.) (ks) (Entered: 01/19/2010) First RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by USA as to Marguerite Grandison (Gerrity, Kevin) (Entered: 01/19/2010) First RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez (Gerrity, Kevin) (Entered: 01/19/2010) PROTECTIVE ORDER Regulating Disclosure of Sensitive Information granting 65 Motion for Protective Order as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2), Robert Antoine (3), Jean Rene Duperval (4), Marguerite Grandison (5). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 1/19/2010. (tp) (Entered: 01/20/2010) ORDER SETTING CRIMINAL TRIAL DATE & PRETRIAL SCHEDULE: as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Marguerite Grandison Calendar Call set for 2/25/2010 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Jury Trial set for 3/1/2010 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez.Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 1/19/2010. (wh) (Entered: 01/20/2010) First RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by USA as to Joel Esquenazi (Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 01/25/2010) Unopposed MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release by Jean Rene Duperval. Responses due by 2/12/2010 (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 01/26/2010) Defendant's MOTION re 69 Order Reassigning/Transferring Case, Motion to Set Aside Order Transfering Case by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 2/12/2010 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 01/26/2010) RESPONSE/REPLY by USA as to Joel Esquenazi to 60 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 01/27/2010) Supplemental MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release by Jean Rene Duperval. Responses due by 2/16/2010 (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 01/27/2010) MOTION to Continue Trial by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by

01/19/2010

71

01/19/2010 01/19/2010 01/20/2010

72 73 74

01/20/2010

75

01/25/2010 01/26/2010

76 77

01/26/2010

78

01/27/2010 01/27/2010

79 80

01/28/2010

81

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (104 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 25 of 266

Page 24 of 96

2/16/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 01/28/2010) 01/29/2010 82 Defendant's MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release by Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 2/16/2010 (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 01/29/2010) ORDER granting 77 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Jean Rene Duperval (4) ; curfew shall be 11:00 P.M. TO 6:30 A.M.. Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown on 1/29/2010. (sl) (Entered: 01/29/2010) MOTION for order unsealing government motion to extend/toll speedy trial time by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 2/18/2010 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 02/01/2010) APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Joel Esquenazi re 79 Response/Reply (Other), 60 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 02/01/2010) ORDER DENYING APPEAL OF BOND CONDITIONS: as to Joel Esquenazi re 60 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court filed by Joel Esquenazi. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/2/2010. (wh) (Entered: 02/02/2010) Unopposed MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release by Robert Antoine as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 2/19/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kainen, Dennis) Modified on 2/3/2010 (ls). (Entered: 02/02/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 87 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct Conditions of Release. Filer Selected the Wrong Motion Relief(s); ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (ls) (Entered: 02/03/2010) NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION in case as to Robert Antoine 87 Unopposed Motion to Modify Conditions of Release: Motion Hearing set for Thursday, 2/4/2010 at 2:00 PM, 301 N. Miami Avenue 11th Floor in Miami Division before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff. (lw1) (Entered: 02/03/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 84 MOTION for order unsealing government motion to extend/toll speedy trial time Replies due by 2/16/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 02/03/2010) $400,000 PSB Bond Entered as to Jean Rene Duperval Approved by Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown (sl) (Entered: 02/04/2010) ORDER approving Nebbia as to Jean Rene Duperval. Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown on 1/29/2010. (sl) (Entered: 02/04/2010)

01/29/2010

83

02/01/2010

84

02/01/2010

85

02/02/2010

86

02/02/2010

87

02/03/2010

88

02/03/2010

89

02/03/2010

90

02/04/2010 02/04/2010

91 92

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 02/04/2010 93 Date (105 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 26 of 266

Page 25 of 96

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff: Motion Hearing as to Robert Antoine held on 2/4/2010 re 87 Unopposed Motion to Modify Conditions of Release filed by Robert Antoine. Court grants Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Modify Conditions of Release. (Please see court minutes for further details.) Order to follow. (Digital 14:23:46.) (Tape #10G-9-125.) (lw1) (Entered: 02/04/2010) ORDER approving Nebbia as to Carlos Rodriguez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 1/22/2010. (sl) (Entered: 02/04/2010) $50,000 CSB Bond Entered as to Carlos Rodriguez Approved by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube (sl) (Entered: 02/04/2010) $100,000 PSB Bond Entered as to Carlos Rodriguez Approved by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube (sl) (Entered: 02/04/2010) $150,000 CSB Bond as set in California remains in effect as to Joel Esquenazi Approved by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton Special Conditions: a. Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;b. Report to Pretrial Services as directed;g. Maintain or actively seek full-time employment;i. Avoid all contact with victims of or witnesses to the crimes charged, except through counsel;k. None of the signatories may sell, pledge, mortgage, etc., any property they own, real or personal, until the bond is discharged;n. Home Confinement Program with electronic monitoring and curfew of 11:00 pm to 7:00 am;q. Comply with additional conditions of bond: Must reside at present address (tp) (Entered: 02/05/2010) ORDER granting 87 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Robert Antoine (3). (Please see Order for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff on 2/4/2010. (lw1) (Entered: 02/05/2010) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Joel Esquenazi re 84 MOTION for order unsealing government motion to extend/toll speedy trial time (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 02/08/2010) ORDER Denying 78 Motion as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/8/2010. (wh) (Entered: 02/08/2010) ORDER Denying as Moot 84 Motion as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/8/2010. (wh) (Entered: 02/08/2010) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley: Status Conference re report re counsel and arraignment as to Robert Antoine held on 2/9/2010. Matter reset. ( Arraignment RESET for 3/1/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Report Re: Counsel Hearing RESET for 3/1/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate.) (Digital 10:02:22 / 10:05:03.) (Tape #10H-9.) (gm1) (Entered: 02/09/2010) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley: Status Conference report re counsel and arraignment as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 2/9/2010. Matter reset. ( Arraignment RESET for

02/04/2010 02/04/2010 02/04/2010 02/04/2010

94 95 96 97

02/04/2010

98

02/08/2010

99

02/08/2010 02/08/2010 02/09/2010

100 101 102

02/09/2010

103

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (106 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 27 of 266

Page 26 of 96

3/1/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate. Report Re: Counsel Hearing RESET for 3/1/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate.) (Digital 10:02:22 / 10:05:03.) (Tape #10H-9.) (gm1) (Entered: 02/09/2010) 02/09/2010 104 NOTICE of Related Action and Notice of Joint Motion to Transfer Case by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison (Gerrity, Kevin) (Entered: 02/09/2010) Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pre Trial Motions by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 3/1/2010 (Diaz, Richard) Modified on 2/11/2010 to reflect text(tb). (Entered: 02/10/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 81 MOTION to Continue Trial Replies due by 2/22/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 02/10/2010) NOTICE OF HEARING: as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison Status Conference set for 2/25/2010 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 02/11/2010) ORDER Requiring Response(s) from AUSA by 1:00 pm on 2/17/10 as to Marguerite Grandison re 82 Defendant's MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release filed by Marguerite Grandison. Defendant shall have until 2:00 pm on 2/19/10 to file and deliver to opposing counsel a Reply in support of the Motion to Modify Conditions of Release. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 2/12/2010. (tp) (Entered: 02/12/2010) Set Deadlines re Motion or Report and Recommendation in case as to Marguerite Grandison 82 Defendant's MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release. Responses due by 2/17/2010 Replies due by 2/19/2010. (tp) (Entered: 02/12/2010) 109 MOTION to Compel Government to Provide Certain Information by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 3/1/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit b)(Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 02/12/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Marguerite Grandison re 82 Defendant's MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Replies due by 2/26/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 02/16/2010) ORDER granting 82 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Marguerite Grandison (5). See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 10/22/10. (ch1) (Entered: 02/22/2010) NOTICE OF HEARING: as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison Status Conference reset for 2/26/2010 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 02/24/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi re 109 MOTION to Compel Government to Provide Certain Information Replies due by

02/10/2010

105

02/10/2010

106

02/11/2010

107

02/12/2010

108

02/12/2010

02/12/2010

02/16/2010

110

02/22/2010

111

02/24/2010

112

02/25/2010

113

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (107 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 28 of 266

Page 27 of 96

3/8/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 02/25/2010) 02/26/2010 114 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA: as to Robert Antoine Change of Plea Hearing set for 3/12/2010 10:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 02/26/2010) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Dennis Gary Kainen appearing for Robert Antoine (Kainen, Dennis) Party Text Modified on 3/1/2010 (ail). (Entered: 02/26/2010) Minute Order: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Status Conference as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison held on 2/26/2010. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 02/26/2010) MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 3/18/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 03/01/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 115 Notice of Attorney Appearance - Defendant. Wrong Name(s) Selected; ERROR - The correction was made by the Clerk. In the future select only the Party that is related to the document being filed. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ail) (Entered: 03/01/2010) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff: Arraignment as to Robert Antoine (3) Count 9 held on 3/1/2010 (Digital 10:08:22.) (Tape #10-G-13-1913.) (ks) (Entered: 03/02/2010) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff: Status re Arraignment and Report re Counsel hearing as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 3/1/2010, ( Arraignment reset for 3/22/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate., Report Re: Counsel Hearing reset for 3/22/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Duty Magistrate.) (Digital 10:09:11.) (Tape #10G-13-1913.) (ks) (Entered: 03/02/2010) ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to counts Robert Antoine (3) Count 9. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held on 3/1/2010 before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff. Tape #10G-13-1913 (Digital 10:08:22.) English (tp) (Entered: 03/02/2010) STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER as to Robert Antoine. All motions concerning matters not covered by this order must be filed within 28 days of this order.. Signed by Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff on 3/1/10. (tp) (Entered: 03/02/2010) ORDER TO CONTINUE - Ends of Justice as to Carlos Rodriguez Time excluded from 1/28/2010 until 4/12/2010. Calendar Call set for 4/8/2010 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez., Jury Trial set for 4/12/2010 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Motions terminated as to Carlos Rodriguez: 81 MOTION to Continue Trial filed by Carlos Rodriguez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/1/2010. (wh) (Entered: 03/02/2010)

02/26/2010

115

02/26/2010

116

03/01/2010

117

03/01/2010

118

03/01/2010

119

03/01/2010

120

03/01/2010

121

03/02/2010

122

03/02/2010

123

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 03/02/2010 124 Date (108 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 29 of 266

Page 28 of 96

ORDER TO CONTINUE - Ends of Justice as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison Time excluded from 2/26/2010 until 4/12/2010. Calendar Call set for 4/8/2010 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Jury Trial set for 4/12/2010 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez.Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/2/2010. (wh) (Entered: 03/02/2010) ORDER Denying as moot 105 Motion for Extension of Time to File as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/3/2010. (wh) (Entered: 03/04/2010) TRANSCRIPT of hearing as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison held on 02-26-2010 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 24 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 3/29/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/7/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/7/2010. (dwh) (Entered: 03/04/2010) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Joel Esquenazi re 109 MOTION to Compel Government to Provide Certain Information (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 03/08/2010) ORDER Setting Hearing on 109 MOTION to Compel Government to Provide Certain Information : as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Motion Hearing set for 3/23/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/9/2010. (wh) (Entered: 03/09/2010) WAIVER of Speedy Trial by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 03/10/2010) NOTICE of Withdrawal of Motion by Joel Esquenazi re 109 MOTION to Compel Government to Provide Certain Information (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 03/10/2010) WAIVER of Speedy Trial by Marguerite Grandison (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 03/11/2010) Minute Order: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Change of Plea Hearing as to Robert Antoine held on 3/12/2010 Robert Antoine (3) Guilty Count 9. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 03/12/2010) NOTICE OF SENTENCING: as to Robert Antoine Sentencing set for 5/27/2010 02:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 03/12/2010) FACTUAL PROFFER STATEMENT: Exhibit #1 as to Robert Antoine (wh) (Entered: 03/12/2010)

03/04/2010

125

03/04/2010

126

03/08/2010

127

03/09/2010

128

03/10/2010 03/10/2010

129 130

03/11/2010 03/12/2010

131 132

03/12/2010

133

03/12/2010

134

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 03/12/2010 03/12/2010 135 Date (109 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 30 of 266

Page 29 of 96

PLEA AGREEMENT: Exhibit #2 as to Robert Antoine (wh) (Entered: 03/12/2010) Terminate Hearings regarding the 3/23/2010 Hearings: as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. (wh) (Entered: 03/12/2010)

03/17/2010

136

NOTICE RE-SETTING SENTENCING: as to Robert Antoine Sentencing reset for 6/1/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 03/17/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi re 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial Replies due by 3/29/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 03/18/2010) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown: Arraignment as to Jean Rene Duperval (4) Count 9,10-21 held on 3/22/2010, Report Re: Counsel Hearing, FDP Appointed as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 3/22/2010. set and continued at$525K PBS, $75K (10%), $400K PSB. NO INTERPRETER required. (Digital 10:04:26.) (Tape #10D6.) (ag) (Entered: 03/22/2010) ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to counts Jean Rene Duperval (4) Count 9,10-21. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held on 3/22/2010 before Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown. FPD Appointed. Defendant released on Bond. NO INTERPRETER. Tape #10D-6 (Digital 10:04:26.) (ag) (Entered: 03/22/2010) STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER as to Jean Rene Duperval. All motions concerning matters not covered by this order must be filed within 28 days of this order. Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown on 3/22/2010. (ag) (Entered: 03/22/2010) Notice of Assignment of Assistant Federal Public Defender as to Jean Rene Duperval. Attorney Jan Christopher Smith, II added. (Smith, Jan) (Entered: 03/26/2010) Invocation of Right to Silence and Counsel by Jean Rene Duperval (Dopico, Hector) (Entered: 03/28/2010) Unopposed MOTION to Travel by Marguerite Grandison. (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 03/29/2010) ORDER Denying 117 Motion for written jury instructionswell in advance of trial as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/26/2010. (wh) (Entered: 03/29/2010) ORDER Granting 143 Motion to Travel as to Marguerite Grandison (5). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/29/2010. (wh) (Entered: 03/29/2010) Amended MOTION to Travel by Marguerite Grandison. (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 03/31/2010) MOTION to Continue Trial by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 4/22/2010

03/18/2010

137

03/22/2010

138

03/22/2010

139

03/22/2010

140

03/26/2010

141

03/28/2010 03/29/2010 03/29/2010

142 143 144

03/29/2010 03/31/2010 04/05/2010

145 146 147

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (110 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 31 of 266

Page 30 of 96

(Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 04/05/2010) 04/05/2010 04/05/2010 04/06/2010 04/08/2010 148 149 150 151 RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 04/05/2010) MOTION to Continue Trial by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 4/22/2010 (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 04/05/2010) NOTICE of Striking 146 Amended MOTION to Travel by Marguerite Grandison (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 04/06/2010) Minute Order: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Calendar Call as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison held on 4/8/2010. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-5235598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 04/08/2010) ORDER TO CONTINUE - Ends of Justice as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison Time excluded from 4/5/2010 until 7/19/2010. Calendar Call set for 7/15/2010 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez., Jury Trial set for 7/19/2010 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/9/2010. (wh) (Entered: 04/12/2010) MOTION extend curfew by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 5/10/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 04/23/2010) ORDER Granting 153 Motion to extend curfew for special event as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/23/2010. (wh) (Entered: 04/26/2010) NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY by Carlos Rodriguez (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 04/28/2010) ORDER STRIKING 155 Notice of Unavailability filed by Carlos Rodriguez as to Carlos Rodriguez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/29/2010. (wh) (Entered: 04/29/2010) OBJECTIONS TO PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT by Robert Antoine (Mark, Brielle) (Entered: 05/06/2010) Unopposed MOTION to Continue Sentencing by Robert Antoine as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 6/11/2010 (Kainen, Dennis) (Entered: 05/25/2010) ORDER DENYING: as to Robert Antoine re 158 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Sentencing filed by Robert Antoine, Sentencing set for 6/1/2010 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Motions terminated as to Robert Antoine: 158 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Sentencing filed by Robert Antoine. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 5/25/2010. (wh) (Entered: 05/25/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 158 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Sentencing.

04/12/2010

152

04/23/2010

153

04/26/2010

154

04/28/2010 04/29/2010

155 156

05/06/2010 05/25/2010

157 158

05/25/2010

159

05/27/2010

160

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (111 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 32 of 266

Page 31 of 96

Wrong Defendant Selected; ERROR - The filer selected the Master Case, instead of the applicable defendant. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 05/27/2010) 05/27/2010 161 MOTION Extend Curfew to Travel by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 6/14/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 05/27/2010) MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 6/14/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit)(Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 05/28/2010) Minute Order: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Sentencing held on 6/1/2010 as to Robert Antoine. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 06/01/2010) MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations by Joel Esquenazi as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 6/18/2010 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 06/01/2010) ORDER of Forfeiture as to Robert Antoine. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/1/2010. (tb) (Entered: 06/02/2010) ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 161 Motion as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/1/2010. (wh) (Entered: 06/02/2010) ORDER ON SENTENCING: as to Robert Antoine re 163 sentencing minutes. On or before 6/4/2010, defendant either shall submit the written waiver referenced, or shall inform the Court of a desire to vacate his prior sentence and conduct a new sentencing hearing. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/1/2010. (wh) (Entered: 06/02/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 164 MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations. Wrong Defendant Selected; ERROR - The filer selected the Master Case, instead of the applicable defendant(Joel Esquenazi Only). The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (lk) (Entered: 06/02/2010) NOTICE by USA as to Robert Antoine re 166 Order, Set Deadlines,, (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 06/04/2010) NOTICE Statement Regarding Sentencing by Robert Antoine (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Kainen, Dennis) (Entered: 06/04/2010) STATEMENT regarding Sentencing Hearing by Robert Antoine (ls)(See Image at DE # 170 ) (Entered: 06/08/2010) MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of

05/28/2010

162

06/01/2010

163

06/01/2010

164

06/01/2010 06/02/2010

168 165

06/02/2010

166

06/02/2010

167

06/04/2010 06/04/2010 06/04/2010 06/07/2010

169 170 173 171

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (112 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 33 of 266

Page 32 of 96

Limitations by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 6/24/2010 (Diaz, Richard) Modified on 6/8/2010 (ls). [Additional Relief Re-docketed at DE #176] (Entered: 06/07/2010) 06/07/2010 06/07/2010 06/08/2010 172 176 174 NOTICE of Filing by Robert Antoine re 170 Notice (Other) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Kainen, Dennis) (Entered: 06/07/2010) MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 6/24/2010 (ls)(See Image at DE # 171 ) (Entered: 06/08/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 170 Notice (Other). Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#173]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 06/08/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations. Motion with Multiple Reliefs Filed as One Relief; ERROR - The Filer selected only one relief event and failed to select the additional corresponding events for each relief requested in the motion. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (ls) (Entered: 06/08/2010) MOTION issuance of subpoenas duces tecum pursuant to rule 17(c) by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 6/25/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 06/08/2010) MOTION for Release of Brady Materials and for Order to Preserve Evidence by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 6/25/2010 (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 06/08/2010) NOTICE of Underseal Ex Parte filing by Carlos Rodriguez re 177 MOTION issuance of subpoenas duces tecum pursuant to rule 17(c) (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 06/09/2010) Sealed Document (ra) (Entered: 06/09/2010) MOTION to Sever Defendant by Carlos Rodriguez. (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 06/09/2010) JUDGMENT as to Robert Antoine (3), Count(s) 9, Imprisonment for a term of 48 months followed by a term of 3 years Supervised Release for sentencing held on 6/9/2010 Restitution: $1,852,209.39 Assessment: $100.00. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/9/2010. (ail) (Entered: 06/10/2010) MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations by Carlos Rodriguez as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 6/28/2010 (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 06/10/2010) Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment,

06/08/2010

175

06/08/2010

177

06/08/2010

178

06/09/2010

179

06/09/2010 06/09/2010 06/09/2010

180 181 182

06/10/2010

183

06/10/2010

184

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (113 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 34 of 266

Page 33 of 96

Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations by Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 6/28/2010 (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 06/10/2010) 06/11/2010 185 Clerks Notice to Filer re 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations. Wrong Defendant Selected; ERROR The filer selected the Master Case, instead of the applicable defendant(s). The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 06/11/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez re 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 164 MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations Replies due by 6/24/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 06/14/2010) NOTICE to Court to Schedule Motions Calendar by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison (Gerrity, Kevin) Modified on 6/17/2010 (ls). (Entered: 06/16/2010) MOTION For Government to Provide PSIR of Witnesses by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 7/6/2010 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 06/18/2010) MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 7/6/2010 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 06/18/2010) MOTION to Continue Trial by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 7/6/2010 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 06/18/2010) MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 7/6/2010 (ls)(See Image at DE # 189 ) (Entered: 06/22/2010) Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 190 MOTION to Continue Trial by Marguerite Grandison as to Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 7/8/2010 (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 06/21/2010) PAPERLESS ORDER Requiring Response from AUSA as to Carlos Rodriguez re 181 MOTION to Sever Defendant filed by Carlos Rodriguez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/21/2010. (lcs) (Entered: 06/21/2010) MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 7/8/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D) (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 06/21/2010) MOTION to Adopt/Join 190 MOTION to Continue Trial by Jean Rene Duperval as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 7/8/2010 (Smith, Jan) (Entered: 06/21/2010)

06/14/2010

186

06/16/2010

187

06/18/2010 06/18/2010 06/18/2010 06/18/2010 06/21/2010

188 189 190 198 191

06/21/2010

192

06/21/2010

193

06/21/2010

194

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 06/21/2010 195 Date (114 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 35 of 266

Page 34 of 96

MOTION for Disclosure by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 7/8/2010 (Fagan, Aurora). Added MOTION to Strike Affidavit on 6/23/2010 (ls). (Entered: 06/21/2010) MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 7/8/2010 (ls)(See Image at DE # 193 ) (Entered: 06/23/2010) SUPPLEMENT to 190 MOTION to Continue Trial filed by Joel Esquenazi by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 06/22/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for PreIndictment Delay. Motion with Multiple Reliefs Filed as One Relief; ERROR - The Filer selected only one relief event and failed to select the additional corresponding events for each relief requested in the motion. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (ls) (Entered: 06/22/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence. Motion with Multiple Reliefs Filed as One Relief; ERROR - The Filer selected only one relief event and failed to select the additional corresponding events for each relief requested in the motion. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (ls) (Entered: 06/23/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 195 MOTION for Disclosure or to Strike Affidavit. Motion with Multiple Reliefs Filed as One Relief; ERROR - The Filer selected only one relief event and failed to select the additional corresponding events for each relief requested in the motion. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (ls) (Entered: 06/23/2010) SUPPLEMENT to 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence filed by Joel Esquenazi by Joel Esquenazi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 06/23/2010) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Carlos Rodriguez re 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 06/24/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations, 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of StatuteDefendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to

06/21/2010 06/22/2010 06/22/2010

200 196 197

06/23/2010

199

06/23/2010

201

06/23/2010

202

06/24/2010

203

06/24/2010

204

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (115 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 36 of 266

Page 35 of 96

Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute, 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations Replies due by 7/6/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Text of Proposed Order)(Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 06/24/2010) 06/24/2010 06/25/2010 205 206 Sealed Document (nc) (Entered: 06/24/2010) MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 196 Supplement, 188 MOTION For Government to Provide PSIR of Witnesses, 202 Supplement by Carlos Rodriguez as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 7/12/2010 (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 06/25/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez re 181 MOTION to Sever Defendant Replies due by 7/6/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 06/25/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez re 178 MOTION for Release of Brady Materials and for Order to Preserve Evidence, 177 MOTION issuance of subpoenas duces tecum pursuant to rule 17(c) Replies due by 7/6/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 06/25/2010) ORDER granting in part and denying in part 195 Motion for Disclosure as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); granting in part and denying in part 195 Motion to Strike as to Carlos Rodriguez (2) It is granted in that Defendant Rodriguez's ex parte, under seal affidavit (DE No. 177 Exh. C) is Striken. It is denied in all other respect. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/24/2010. (ail) (Entered: 06/28/2010) RESPONSE/REPLY by Joel Esquenazi to 187 Notice (Other) to the Court to Schedule Motions Calendar (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 06/28/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 194 MOTION to Adopt/Join 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 206 MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 196 Suppleme MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 196 Suppleme, 191 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 190 MOTION to Continue Trial Replies due by 7/8/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 06/28/2010) Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment,

06/25/2010

207

06/25/2010

208

06/25/2010

209

06/28/2010 06/28/2010

210 211

06/28/2010

212

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (116 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 37 of 266

Page 36 of 96

For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence by Marguerite Grandison as to Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 7/15/2010 (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 06/28/2010) 06/28/2010 213 ORDER GRANTING: as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 187 Notice To Court to Schedule Motions Calendar filed by USA, Set/Reset Deadlines re Motion in case as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Motion Hearing set for 7/13/2010 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/28/2010. (wh) (Entered: 06/28/2010) NOTICE of Conflict by Joel Esquenazi re 213 Order, Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings,, (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 06/29/2010) NOTICE of Expert Testimony by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Fagan, Aurora) Modified on 6/30/2010 (ls). (Entered: 06/30/2010) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Joel Esquenazi re 190 MOTION to Continue Trial (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/01/2010) NOTICE of Foreign Business Records by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 07/01/2010) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Carlos Rodriguez re 178 MOTION for Release of Brady Materials and for Order to Preserve Evidence, 181 MOTION to Sever Defendant, 177 MOTION issuance of subpoenas duces tecum pursuant to rule 17(c) Consolidated Reply (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 07/02/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 206 MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 196 Suppleme MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 196 Suppleme Replies due by 7/12/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 07/02/2010) NOTICE of 404(b) Evidence by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison (Gerrity, Kevin) (Entered: 07/02/2010) NOTICE of Intent to Use Evidence 404(b) by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison (ls)(See Image at DE # 220 ) (Entered: 07/07/2010)

06/29/2010 06/30/2010

214 215

07/01/2010 07/01/2010

216 217

07/02/2010

218

07/02/2010

219

07/02/2010

220

07/02/2010

223

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 07/06/2010 221 Date (117 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 38 of 266

Page 37 of 96

MOTION in Limine to Exclude Banruptcy Deposition and Alternatively to Redact Same by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 7/23/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 07/06/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez re 206 MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 196 Suppleme MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 196 Suppleme, 188 MOTION For Government to Provide PSIR of Witnesses Replies due by 7/16/2010. (Gerrity, Kevin) (Entered: 07/06/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 220 Notice (Other). Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#223]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 07/07/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 212 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 206 MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 196 Suppleme MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 196 Suppleme Replies due by 7/19/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 07/08/2010) MOTION to Continue Motions Calendar Hearing by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 7/26/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/08/2010) ORDER GRANTING: as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 226 MOTION to Continue Motions Calendar Hearing filed by Joel Esquenazi, Calendar Call reset for 7/13/2010 10:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez., Motions Hearing reset for 7/13/2010 11:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Set/Reset Deadlines re Motion or Report and Recommendation in case as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Motions terminated as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison: 226 MOTION to Continue Motions Calendar Hearing filed by Joel Esquenazi.. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/8/2010. (wh) (Entered: 07/08/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez,

07/06/2010

222

07/07/2010

224

07/08/2010

225

07/08/2010

226

07/08/2010

227

07/12/2010

228

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (118 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 39 of 266

Page 38 of 96

Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 164 MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations, 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations Supplemental Motion Replies due by 7/22/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit C1, # 2 Exhibit F)(Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 07/12/2010) 07/12/2010 229 REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Joel Esquenazi re 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/12/2010) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Joel Esquenazi re 188 MOTION For Government to Provide PSIR of Witnesses (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/12/2010) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Joel Esquenazi re 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/12/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez re 221 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Banruptcy Deposition and Alternatively to Redact Same Replies due by 7/22/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 07/12/2010) TRANSCRIPT of sentencing hearing as to Robert Antoine held on 06-012010 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-39 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/6/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/16/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/14/2010. (dwh) (Entered: 07/13/2010) Corrected Transcript and Notice of Correction of sentencing hearing as to Robert Antoine held on 06-01-10 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-39 pages, REASON FOR CORRECTION: misspelled name. re: 233 Transcript,, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. (dwh) (Entered: 07/13/2010) Minute Order for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: denying 171 Motion to Dismiss as to Joel Esquenazi (1); denying 176 Motion for Hearing as to Joel Esquenazi (1); taking under advisement 188 Motion as to Joel Esquenazi (1); denying 189 Motion to Dismiss as to Joel Esquenazi (1); taking under advisement 193 Motion to Dismiss as to Joel Esquenazi (1); taking under advisement 200 Motion for Hearing as to Joel Esquenazi (1); denying 177 Motion as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); denying 181 Motion to Sever Defendant as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); denying 221 Motion in Limine as to

07/12/2010

230

07/12/2010

231

07/12/2010

232

07/13/2010

233

07/13/2010

234

07/13/2010

239

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (119 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 40 of 266

Page 39 of 96

Carlos Rodriguez (2); Motion Hearing as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison held on 7/13/2010 re 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay filed by Joel Esquenazi, 200 MOTION for Hearing filed by Joel Esquenazi, 188 MOTION For Government to Provide PSIR of Witnesses filed by Joel Esquenazi, 181 MOTION to Sever Defendant filed by Carlos Rodriguez, 176 MOTION for Hearing filed by Joel Esquenazi, 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations filed by Joel Esquenazi. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (mr1) (bb). (Entered: 07/21/2010) 07/13/2010 240 Minute Order for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: granting 164 Motion to Adopt/Join 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute joined by Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2); 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute joined by Carlos Rodriguez (2). as to Joel Esquenazi (1); granting 183 Motion to Adopt/Join 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute joined by Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2); 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute joined by Carlos Rodriguez (2). as to Joel Esquenazi (1); granting 206 Motion to Adopt/Join 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute joined by Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2); 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute joined by Carlos Rodriguez (2). as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2); granting 212 Motion to Adopt/Join 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute joined by Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2); 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute joined by Carlos Rodriguez (2). as to Joel Esquenazi (1); granting 184 Motion to Adopt/Join 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute joined by Joel Esquenazi (1),

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (120 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 41 of 266

Page 40 of 96

Carlos Rodriguez (2); 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute joined by Carlos Rodriguez (2). as to Marguerite Grandison (5); Motion Hearing as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison held on 7/13/2010 re 206 MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 196 Suppleme MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 196 Suppleme filed by Carlos Rodriguez, 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations filed by Carlos Rodriguez, 164 MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations filed by Joel Esquenazi, 184 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of StatuteDefendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute filed by Marguerite Grandison, 212 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence ; Calendar Call as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison held on 7/13/2010. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (mr1) (bb). (Entered: 07/21/2010) 07/14/2010 07/15/2010 235 236 Sealed Document (nc) (Entered: 07/14/2010) Unopposed MOTION to Continue Surrender Date by Robert Antoine. Responses due by 8/2/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Kainen, Dennis) (Entered: 07/15/2010) NOTICE of Filing Particularized Areas of PSIRS for COurt to Review and Determine if its Brady/Giglio Information by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/16/2010) ORDER TO CONTINUE - Ends of Justice as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison Time excluded from 6/18/2010 until 12/6/2010. Calendar Call set for 12/2/2010 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez., Jury Trial set for 12/6/2010 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Motions terminated as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval,

07/16/2010

237

07/21/2010

238

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (121 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 42 of 266

Page 41 of 96

Marguerite Grandison: 194 MOTION to Adopt/Join 190 MOTION to Continue Trial filed by Jean Rene Duperval, 191 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 190 MOTION to Continue Trial, 190 MOTION to Continue Trial filed by Joel Esquenazi. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/16/2010. (wh) (Entered: 07/21/2010) 07/21/2010 241 ORDER Granting 236 Unopposed Motion to Extend Surrender Date as to Robert Antoine (3). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/21/2010. (wh) (Entered: 07/21/2010) Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re Minute Orders at DE 240 and DE 239 . ERROR: Document was not attached. Correction: The document has been attached to this notice. (bb) (Entered: 07/22/2010) MOTION to Continue Reset Trial by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 8/16/2010 (Hernandez, Arturo) Modified relief on 8/2/2010 (tp). (Entered: 07/30/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 243 Motion to Reset Trial Date. Filer Selected the Wrong Motion Relief(s); ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (tp) (Entered: 08/02/2010) Sealed Document (vp) (Entered: 08/04/2010) MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Pretrial Release by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 8/30/2010 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 08/11/2010) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENSE COUNSEL TO RESPOND: as to Joel Esquenazi, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Set/Reset Deadlines re: Motion as to Carlos Rodriguez, 243 Motion to Reset Trial Date. Responses due by 8/27/2010. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/13/2010. (wh) (Entered: 08/13/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by Joel Esquenazi as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 243 Motion to Reset Trial Date Replies due by 8/27/2010. (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 08/17/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by Marguerite Grandison as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 243 Motion to Reset Trial Date Replies due by 8/27/2010. (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 08/17/2010) ORDER REFERRING MOTION as to Joel Esquenazi 246 MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Pretrial Release filed by Joel Esquenazi Motions referred to Stephen T. Brown. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/19/2010. (wh) (Entered: 08/19/2010) PAPERLESS ORDER VACATING as to Joel Esquenazi re 250 Order Referring Motion to Chief Magistrate Judge Brown.. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/20/2010. (wh) (Entered: 08/20/2010)

07/22/2010

242

07/30/2010

243

08/02/2010

244

08/03/2010 08/11/2010

245 246

08/13/2010

247

08/17/2010

248

08/17/2010

249

08/19/2010

250

08/20/2010

251

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 08/20/2010 252 Date (122 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 43 of 266

Page 42 of 96

ORDER REFERRING MOTION as to Joel Esquenazi 246 MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Pretrial Release filed by Joel Esquenazi Motions referred to Andrea M. Simonton. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/20/2010. (wh) (Entered: 08/20/2010) SUPPLEMENT to 246 MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Pretrial Release filed by Joel Esquenazi by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 08/23/2010) MOTION to Adopt/Join 246 MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Pretrial Release by Carlos Rodriguez as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 9/9/2010 (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 08/23/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by Jean Rene Duperval as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 243 Motion to Reset Trial Date Replies due by 9/7/2010. (Smith, Jan) (Entered: 08/27/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez re 254 MOTION to Adopt/Join 246 MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Pretrial Release, 246 MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Pretrial Release Replies due by 9/7/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 08/28/2010) TRANSCRIPT of hearing on defense motions as to Joel Esquenazi held on 713-2010 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 46 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 9/23/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 10/4/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/1/2010. (dwh) (Entered: 08/30/2010) ORDER RE-SETTING CALENDAR CALL AND TRIAL DATE as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, as to 243 Motion to Reset Trial Date. ( Calendar Call reset for 11/18/2010 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez., Trial set for 11/29/2010 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez.). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/31/2010. (ail) (Entered: 09/01/2010) Defendant's MOTION To extend Curfew for Special Event by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 10/1/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proposed Order)(Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 09/14/2010) ORDER denying 246 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton on 9/14/2010. (AMS) (Entered: 09/14/2010) TEXT ORDER granting 259 Motion To Extend Curfew for Special Event as to Joel Esquenazi (1). According to the motion, this relief is not opposed by the Government or the probation officer who is supervising Mr. Esquenazi. Therefore, Mr. Esquenazi may attend the Men's Emmaus Retreat at Mother of Christ Catholic Church from Friday, September 17, 2010, through Sunday,

08/23/2010

253

08/23/2010

254

08/27/2010

255

08/28/2010

256

08/30/2010

257

08/31/2010

258

09/14/2010

259

09/14/2010

260

09/14/2010

261

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (123 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 44 of 266

Page 43 of 96

September 19, 2010, and may stay overnight at the retreat house on September 17th and September 18th. He will not be subject to a curfew on September 17th and 18th, provided that he is staying at the retreat house in connection with this event. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton on 9/14/2010. (AMS) (Entered: 09/14/2010) 09/15/2010 262 ORDER Denying as Moot 254 Motion to Adopt/Join as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/14/2010. (wh) (Entered: 09/15/2010) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: John Edwin Bergendahl appearing for Jean Rene Duperval (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 10/13/2010) NOTICE of Expert Witness Disclosure by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 10/19/2010) Renewed MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing re 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 11/15/2010 (Diaz, Richard) Modified Relief on 10/28/2010 (ls). (Entered: 10/27/2010) First NOTICE of Reciprocal Discovery to Government by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) Modified Text on 10/28/2010 (ls). (Entered: 10/27/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 265 Renewed MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment,. Filer Selected the Wrong Motion Relief(s); ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (ls) (Entered: 10/28/2010) MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Counts 9-21 by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 11/15/2010 (Diaz, Richard) Modified Text on 10/29/2010 (ls). (Entered: 10/28/2010) First RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by Carlos Rodriguez (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 10/29/2010) First NOTICE of Reciprocal Discovery to Government by Carlos Rodriguez (ls)(See Image at DE # 269 ) (Entered: 11/01/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 269 Response to Standing Discovery Order. Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#270]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 11/01/2010) NOTICE Second Notice of Reciprocal Discovery by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 11/01/2010) MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Failure to State a Criminal Offense and for Vagueness by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 11/19/2010 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 11/02/2010) MOTION in Limine to Limit Use of Interview Reports by the Defense by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 11/24/2010

10/13/2010 10/19/2010 10/27/2010

263 264 265

10/27/2010 10/28/2010

266 267

10/28/2010

268

10/29/2010 10/29/2010 11/01/2010

269 270 271

11/01/2010 11/02/2010

272 273

11/07/2010

274

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (124 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 45 of 266

Page 44 of 96

(Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gerrity, Kevin) Modified Text on 11/8/2010 (ls). (Entered: 11/07/2010) 11/08/2010 275 Clerks Notice to Filer re 274 First MOTION in Limine. Docket Text Does Not Match Document; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter a title in the docket text that matches the title of the document. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile the document. (ls) (Entered: 11/08/2010) NOTICE of Withdrawal by Joel Esquenazi re 273 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Failure to State a Criminal Offense and for Vagueness (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 11/08/2010) RESPONSE/REPLY by Joel Esquenazi to 274 MOTION in Limine to Limit Use of Interview Reports by the Defense (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 11/08/2010) MOTION to Adopt/Join 273 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Failure to State a Criminal Offense and for Vagueness by Carlos Rodriguez as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 11/26/2010 (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 11/08/2010) WITHDRAWAL of Motion by Joel Esquenazi re 273 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Failure to State a Criminal Offense and for Vagueness (ls) (See Image at DE # 276 ) (Entered: 11/09/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by Joel Esquenazi re 274 MOTION in Limine to Limit Use of Interview Reports by the Defense Replies due by 11/18/2010. (ls)(See Image at DE # 277 ) (Entered: 11/09/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 276 Notice (Other). Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#279]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 11/09/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 277 Response/Reply (Other). Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#281]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 11/09/2010) Corrected MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for failure to state a criminal offense and for vagueness by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 11/29/2010 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 11/10/2010) NOTICE of Intent to Offer Records by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison (Gerrity, Kevin) (Entered: 11/11/2010) MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Selective and Vindictive Prosecution by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 11/29/2010 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 11/12/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazire 268 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Counts 9-21 Replies due by 11/22/2010. (Gerrity, Kevin) Modified remove co-defendants on 11/15/2010 (tp). (Entered:

11/08/2010

276

11/08/2010

277

11/08/2010

278

11/08/2010

279

11/08/2010

281

11/09/2010

280

11/09/2010

282

11/10/2010

283

11/11/2010

284

11/12/2010

285

11/12/2010

286

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 11/12/2010) 11/15/2010 287 Date (125 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 46 of 266

Page 45 of 96

Clerks Notice to Filer re 286 Response to Motion. Wrong Defendant Selected; ERROR - The filer selected the Master Case, instead of the applicable defendant. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (tp) (Entered: 11/15/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi re 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 265 Renewed Motion for Evidentiary Hearing re 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment Replies due by 11/26/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A1, # 2 Exhibit A2, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G)(Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 11/15/2010) First MOTION in Limine For Pre-Trial Admission by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 12/2/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A, # 2 Appendix B-1, # 3 Appendix B-2, # 4 Appendix B-3, # 5 Appendix B-4, # 6 Appendix B-5, # 7 Appendix B-6, # 8 Appendix B-7, # 9 Appendix C)(Gerrity, Kevin) (Entered: 11/15/2010) NOTICE OF HEARING: as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison Time of Calendar Call set for 11/18/2010 at 09:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 11/16/2010) MOTION to Disqualify Expert Witness re 264 Notice (Other) by USA as to Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 12/3/2010 (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 11/16/2010) ORDER Denying without prejudice 274 Motion in Limine as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/16/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/16/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi re 285 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Selective and Vindictive Prosecution Replies due by 11/29/2010. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 11/17/2010) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez re 283 Corrected MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for failure to state a criminal offense and for vagueness, 273 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Failure to State a Criminal Offense and for Vagueness, 278 MOTION to Adopt/Join 273 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Failure to State a Criminal Offense and for Vagueness Replies due by 11/29/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 11/17/2010) ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 291 MOTION to Disqualify Expert Witness re 264 Notice (Other) : as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Motion Hearing set for 11/19/2010 09:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/17/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/17/2010)

11/15/2010

288

11/15/2010

289

11/16/2010

290

11/16/2010

291

11/16/2010

292

11/17/2010

293

11/17/2010

294

11/17/2010

295

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 11/17/2010 296 Date (126 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 47 of 266

Page 46 of 96

ORDER Denying 289 Motion in Limine as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2), Jean Rene Duperval (4), Marguerite Grandison (5). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/17/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/17/2010) PAPERLESS ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE: as to Carlos Rodriguez re 254 MOTION to Adopt/Join 246 MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Pretrial Release filed by Carlos Rodriguez. Defendant Rodriguez may refile a motion to modify his conditions of release if appropriate. However, it should be noted that Esquenazi's motion has been denied. See (DE. No. 260). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/17/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/17/2010) PAPERLESS ORDER DENYING: as to Carlos Rodriguez re 278 MOTION to Adopt/Join 273 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Failure to State a Criminal Offense and for Vagueness filed by Carlos Rodriguez. The underlying motion has been withdrawn. See (DE Nos. 276, 279). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/17/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/17/2010) MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial, 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 283 Corrected MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for failure to state a criminal offense and for vagueness, 189 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for Pre-Indictment Delay, 285 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Selective and Vindictive Prosecution, 264 Notice (Other), 269 Response to Standing Discovery Order, 268 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Counts 9-21, 266 Notice (Other), 188 MOTION For Government to Provide PSIR of Witnesses, 272 Notice (Other), 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations by Jean Rene Duperval as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 12/6/2010 (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 11/17/2010) Proposed Jury Instructions by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 11/17/2010) Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial, 283 Corrected MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for failure to state a criminal offense and for vagueness, 285 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Selective and Vindictive Prosecution, 264 Notice (Other), 269 Response to Standing Discovery Order, 268 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Counts 9-21, 266 Notice (Other), 188 MOTION For Government to Provide PSIR of Witnesses, 272 Notice (Other), 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations by Marguerite Grandison as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 12/6/2010 (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 11/18/2010)

11/17/2010

297

11/17/2010

298

11/17/2010

299

11/17/2010

300

11/18/2010

301

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 11/18/2010 302 Date (127 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 48 of 266

Page 47 of 96

PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING as to all motions that have not been ruled upon as to Jean Rene Duperval re 299 MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial, 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial, 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial, 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial, 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial, 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 filed by Jean Rene Duperval. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/18/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/18/2010) PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING as to all motions that have not been ruled upon as to Marguerite Grandison re 301 Defendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial, 283 CorrecDefendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial, 283 CorrecDefendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial, 283 CorrecDefendant's MOTION to Adopt/Join 162 MOTION for Bill of Particulars in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of the Statute of Limitations, 117 MOTION For Written Jury Questionnaire in Advance of Trial, 283 Correc filed by Marguerite Grandison. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/18/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/18/2010) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Calendar Call as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison held on 11/18/2010. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-5235598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 11/18/2010) ORDER Denying 285 Motion to Dismiss as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/18/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/18/2010) ORDER denying as moot 178 Motion for Release of Brady Materials as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/19/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/19/2010) ORDER denying 268 Motion to Dismiss as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/19/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/19/2010)

11/18/2010

303

11/18/2010

304

11/18/2010 11/19/2010

305 306

11/19/2010

307

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 11/19/2010 308 Date (128 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 49 of 266

Page 48 of 96

ORDER denying 265 Motion for Hearing as to Joel Esquenazi (1); denying 193 Motion to Dismiss as to Joel Esquenazi (1); denying 200 Motion for Hearing as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/19/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/19/2010) ORDER denying 283 Motion to Dismiss as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/19/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/19/2010) Minute Order: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Granting 291 Motion as to Joel Esquenazi (1); Motion Hearing held on 11/19/2010 re 291 MOTION to Disqualify Expert Witness re 264 Notice (Other) filed by USA; Motions terminated 291 MOTION to Disqualify Expert Witness re 264 Notice (Other) filed by USA. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-5235598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 11/19/2010) ORDER denying 162 Motion for Bill of Particulars as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/19/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/19/2010) ORDER Granting in part and denying as moot in part 188 Motion as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/19/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/19/2010) Renewed MOTION to Continue Trial Brief Continuance of Trial ( Responses due by 12/9/2010), MOTION for Reconsideration of Order Excluding Defense Expert Witness Camile Le Blanc by Joel Esquenazi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 11/22/2010) ORDER GRANTING: as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 313 Renewed MOTION to Continue Trial Brief Continuance of Trial DENYING MOTION for Reconsideration of Order Excluding Defense Expert Witness Camile Le Blanc filed by Joel Esquenazi. Status Conference set for 11/29/2010 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/22/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/22/2010) MOTION to Adopt/Join 313 Renewed MOTION to Continue Trial Brief Continuance of Trial MOTION for Reconsideration of Order Excluding Defense Expert Witness Camile Le Blanc, 193 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, For Government's Spoliation of Defense Favorable Evidence, 283 Corrected MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, for failure to state a criminal offense and for vagueness, 268 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Counts 921 by Carlos Rodriguez as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 12/9/2010 (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 11/22/2010) NOTICE of Third Reciprocal Discovery by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 11/24/2010) NOTICE of Filing Fourth Notice of Reciprocal Discovery by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 11/24/2010) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Status Conference as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval,

11/19/2010 11/19/2010

309 310

11/19/2010

311

11/19/2010

312

11/22/2010

313

11/22/2010

314

11/22/2010

315

11/24/2010 11/24/2010 11/29/2010

316 317 318

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (129 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 50 of 266

Page 49 of 96

Marguerite Grandison held on 11/29/2010. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 11/29/2010) 11/30/2010 319 ORDER TO CONTINUE - Ends of Justice as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison Time excluded from 11/22/2010 until 2/28/2011. Calendar Call set for 2/24/2011 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez., Jury Trial set for 2/28/2011 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Motions terminated as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison: 313 Renewed MOTION to Continue Trial Brief Continuance of Trial MOTION for Reconsideration of Order Excluding Defense Expert Witness Camile Le Blanc filed by Joel Esquenazi. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/30/2010. (wh) (Entered: 11/30/2010) MOTION to Extend Curfew for Special Event by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 12/20/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order) (Diaz, Richard) Modified on 12/3/2010 (ls). (Entered: 12/02/2010) ORDER Granting 320 Motion to Extend Curfew for Special Event as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/7/2010. (wh) (Entered: 12/07/2010) Unopposed MOTION to Continue Extend Surrender Date by Robert Antoine. Responses due by 1/3/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Kainen, Dennis) Modified Parties on 12/16/2010 (ls). (Entered: 12/15/2010) Clerks Notice to Filer re 322 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Surrender Date. Wrong Defendant Selected; ERROR - The filer selected the Master Case, instead of the applicable defendant. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 12/16/2010) Unopposed MOTION to Allow Extension of Curfew for Holiday by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 1/3/2011 (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 12/16/2010) ORDER REFERRING MOTION as to Carlos Rodriguez 324 Unopposed MOTION to Allow Extension of Curfew for Holiday filed by Carlos Rodriguez Motions referred to Robert L. Dube. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/17/2010. (wh) (Entered: 12/17/2010) ORDER on Unopposed Motion to Modify Curfew; granting 324 Motion as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 12/20/2010. (asl) (Entered: 12/20/2010) ORDER Denying 322 Unopposed Motion to Extend Surrender Date as to Robert Antoine (3). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/20/2010. (wh) (Entered: 12/20/2010) Unopposed MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release For Holiday by Jean Rene Duperval. Responses due by 1/10/2011 (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 12/22/2010) UNOPPOSED MOTION to Modify Curfew by Jean Rene Duperval.

12/02/2010

320

12/07/2010

321

12/15/2010

322

12/16/2010

323

12/16/2010

324

12/17/2010

325

12/20/2010

326

12/20/2010

327

12/22/2010

328

12/29/2010

329

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (130 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 51 of 266

Page 50 of 96

Responses due by 1/18/2011 (Bergendahl, John) Modified text on 12/30/2010 (tp). (Entered: 12/29/2010) 12/29/2010 330 Amended MOTION for Extension of Curfew for Holiday by Jean Rene Duperval. Responses due by 1/18/2011 (Bergendahl, John) Modified text on 12/30/2010 (tp). (Entered: 12/29/2010) ORDER granting 329 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Jean Rene Duperval (4) - see order for full details. Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown on 12/30/2010. (dt) (Entered: 12/30/2010) ORDER denying 330 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Jean Rene Duperval (4) - see order for full details. Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge Stephen T. Brown on 12/30/2010. (dt) (Entered: 12/30/2010) ORDER denying as moot 328 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Jean Rene Duperval (4). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/30/2010. (wh) (Entered: 01/03/2011) MOTION to Continue Trial Date by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 1/31/2011 (Diaz, Richard) Modified Link on 1/18/2011 (ls). (Entered: 01/14/2011) MOTION to Travel by Joel Esquenazi. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 01/19/2011) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi re 335 MOTION to Travel Replies due by 1/31/2011. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 01/20/2011) ORDER Denying 335 Motion to Travel as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 1/20/2011. (wh) (Entered: 01/20/2011) MOTION to Travel by Jean Rene Duperval. (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 01/25/2011) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval re 338 MOTION to Travel Replies due by 2/7/2011. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 01/26/2011) NOTICE of Money Laundering Expert and Request for Reciprocal Notice of Defense Expert on Haitian Law by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison (Fagan, Aurora) Modified Text on 1/28/2011 (ls). (Entered: 01/27/2011) ORDER Granting 338 Motion to Travel as to Jean Rene Duperval (4). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 1/27/2011. (wh) (Entered: 01/27/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 340 Notice (Other). Docket Text Does Not Match Document; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter a title in the docket text that matches the title of the document. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile the document. (ls) (Entered: 01/28/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 343 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 02/02/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 344 restricted/sealed until further notice.

12/30/2010

331

12/30/2010

332

01/03/2011

333

01/14/2011

334

01/19/2011 01/20/2011 01/20/2011 01/25/2011 01/26/2011 01/27/2011

335 336 337 338 339 340

01/27/2011 01/28/2011

341 342

02/02/2011 02/02/2011

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (131 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 52 of 266

Page 51 of 96

(nc) (Entered: 02/02/2011) 02/02/2011 345 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION: in case as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison 334 Motion to Continue Trial Date: Motion Hearing set for 2/8/2011 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 02/02/2011) Unopposed MOTION to Release Bond Obligation </>Exonerate by Robert Antoine. Responses due by 2/22/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kainen, Dennis) Modified Relief and Parties on 2/4/2011 (ls). (Entered: 02/03/2011) NOTICE of Potential Trial Conflict by Carlos Rodriguez (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 02/03/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 346 Unopposed MOTION for Bond Exonerate. Wrong Defendant Selected; ERROR - The filer selected the Master Case, instead of the applicable defendant. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document.Filer Selected the Wrong Motion Relief(s); ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (ls) (Entered: 02/04/2011) MOTION to Strike re 340 Notice (Other) of Money Laundering Expert and Request for Reciprocal Notice of Defense Expert on Haitian Law and Status re: Trial by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 2/24/2011 (Diaz, Richard) Modified Link on 2/7/2011 (ls). (Entered: 02/07/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 349 MOTION to Strike Government's Money Laundering Expert and Response for Reciprocal Discovery and Status re Trial. Document Not Linked; ERROR - The filed document was not linked to the related docket entry. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 02/07/2011) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi re 349 MOTION to Strike re 340 Notice (Other) of Money Laundering Expert and Request for Reciprocal Notice of Defense Expert on Haitian Law and Status re: Trial (Fagan, Aurora) Modified on 2/8/2011 (tp). (Entered: 02/07/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 352 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 02/08/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 353 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 02/08/2011) 354 Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Status Conference as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison held on 2/8/2011. Court Reporter: Robin Dispenzieri, 305-523-5158 / Robin_Dispenzieri@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 02/09/2011) ORDER Granting Unopposed Motion to Exonerate Bond; re 346 Motion to Release Bond Obligation as to Robert Antoine (3). Signed by Judge Jose E.

02/03/2011

346

02/03/2011 02/04/2011

347 348

02/07/2011

349

02/07/2011

350

02/07/2011

351

02/08/2011 02/08/2011 02/08/2011

02/10/2011

355

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (132 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 53 of 266

Page 52 of 96

Martinez on 2/10/2011. (asl) (Entered: 02/11/2011) 02/16/2011 02/16/2011 02/16/2011 02/18/2011 02/18/2011 02/22/2011 356 357 358 359 360 361 WAIVER of Speedy Trial by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 02/16/2011) WAIVER of Speedy Trial by Carlos Rodriguez (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 02/16/2011) WAIVER of Speedy Trial by Jean Rene Duperval (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 02/16/2011) WAIVER of Speedy Trial by Marguerite Grandison (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 02/18/2011) NOTICE of Expert Witness Disclosure by Joel Esquenazi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 02/18/2011) PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM Regarding Determination of Forfeiture Money Judgments and Statement of its Position regarding whether the Defendants are entitled to a Jury for such Determination by Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison (Grove, Daren) Modified Text on 2/23/2011 (ls). (Entered: 02/22/2011) MOTION to Extend Curfew for Special Event by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 3/11/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order) (Diaz, Richard) Modified Text on 2/23/2011 (ls). (Entered: 02/22/2011) ORDER TO CONTINUE - Ends of Justice as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison Time excluded from 1/14/2011 until 7/18/2011. Calendar Call set for 7/14/2011 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez., Jury Trial set for 7/18/2011 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Motions terminated as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison: 334 Motion to Continue Trial Date filed by Joel Esquenazi., as to 334 Motion to Continue Trial Date. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/22/2011. (wh) (Entered: 02/22/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 361 Pretrial Memorandum. Docket Text Does Not Match Document; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter a title in the docket text that matches the title of the document. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile the document. (ls) (Entered: 02/23/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 362 MOTION Extend Curfew. Docket Text Does Not Match Document; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter a title in the docket text that matches the title of the document. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile the document. (ls) (Entered: 02/23/2011) ORDER Granting 362 Motion to extend curfew for special event as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/23/2011. (wh) (Entered: 02/23/2011) MOTION to Admit Redacted Statements by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite

02/22/2011

362

02/22/2011

363

02/23/2011

364

02/23/2011

365

02/23/2011

366

02/23/2011

367

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (133 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 54 of 266

Page 53 of 96

Grandison. Responses due by 3/14/2011 (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 02/23/2011) 03/09/2011 368 TRANSCRIPT of change of plea as to Robert Antoine held on 3-12-2010 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-22 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/4/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/14/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/10/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 03/09/2011) ORDER DIRECTING COUNSEL: as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 367 MOTION to Admit Redacted Statements filed by USA, Set/Reset Deadlines re Motion or Report and Recommendation in case as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison 367 MOTION to Admit Redacted Statements. Responses due by 3/21/2011. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/18/2011. (wh) (Entered: 03/18/2011) RESPONSE in Opposition by Joel Esquenazi re 367 MOTION to Admit Redacted Statements (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 03/21/2011) RESPONSE to Motion by Jean Rene Duperval re 367 MOTION to Admit Redacted Statements Under Bruton Replies due by 3/31/2011. (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 03/21/2011) RESPONSE in Opposition by Marguerite Grandison re 367 MOTION to Admit Redacted Statements (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 03/22/2011) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 367 MOTION to Admit Redacted Statements (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 03/31/2011) Case Reassignment of Paired Magistrate Judge pursuant to Administrative Orders 2010-145 and 2011-18 to Magistrate Judge McAliley as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. (mr1) (Entered: 04/01/2011) NOTICE of Corrected Proposed Order by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 373 Reply to Response (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 04/02/2011) ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 367 MOTION to Admit Redacted Statements : as to Joel Esquenazi, Jean Rene Duperval Motion Hearing set for 4/22/2011 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez.Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/5/2011. (wh) (Entered: 04/05/2011) NOTICE RESETTING HEARING ON MOTION: in case as to Joel Esquenazi, Jean Rene Duperval re: 367 MOTION to Admit Redacted

03/18/2011

369

03/21/2011 03/21/2011

370 371

03/22/2011 03/31/2011

372 373

04/01/2011

374

04/02/2011

375

04/05/2011

376

04/07/2011

377

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (134 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 55 of 266

Page 54 of 96

Statements: Motion Hearing reset for 4/20/2011 02:00 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 04/07/2011) 04/08/2011 378 Defendant's MOTION to Travel, Defendant's MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release ( Responses due by 4/25/2011) by Marguerite Grandison. (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 04/08/2011) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Marguerite Grandison re 378 Defendant's MOTION to TravelDefendant's MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Replies due by 4/22/2011. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 04/12/2011) ORDER Granting 378 Motion to Travel as to Marguerite Grandison (5); Denying 378 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Marguerite Grandison (5). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/14/2011. (wh) (Entered: 04/14/2011) NOTICE RESETTING HEARING: Motion in case as to Joel Esquenazi, Jean Rene Duperval 367 MOTION to Admit Redacted Statements. Motion Hearing reset for 4/26/2011 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez.Signed by Courtroom Deputy on 4/20/2011. (wh) Modified to add DE# on 4/20/2011 (wc). Modified docket entry title on 4/20/2011 (wc). (Entered: 04/20/2011) Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re 381 Notice Resetting Hearing. Correction, Document attached for that entry. (wh) (Entered: 04/20/2011) Minute Order: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Denying with respect to the statement by Duperval. 367 Motion as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2), Jean Rene Duperval (4); Motion Hearing held on 4/26/2011 re 367 MOTION to Admit Redacted Statements filed by USA; Motions terminated 367 MOTION to Admit Redacted Statements filed by USA. A separate written order shall follow. Court Reporter: Judy Shelton, 305-523-5294 / Judy_Shelton@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 04/26/2011) Unopposed MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release (Extend Curfew) by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 5/19/2011 (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 05/02/2011) ORDER REFERRING MOTION as to Carlos Rodriguez 384 Unopposed MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release (Extend Curfew) filed by Carlos Rodriguez Motions referred to Robert L. Dube. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 5/5/2011. (wh) (Entered: 05/05/2011) ORDER GRANTING 384 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 5/5/2011. (mdc) (Entered: 05/05/2011) Unopposed Supplemental MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release/Extend Curfew by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 5/26/2011 (Hernandez, Arturo) Modified Text on 5/10/2011 (ls). (Entered: 05/09/2011) ORDER REFERRING MOTION as to Carlos Rodriguez 387 Unopposed Supplemental MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release/Extend Curfew filed by Carlos Rodriguez. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Robert L.

04/12/2011

379

04/14/2011

380

04/20/2011

381

04/20/2011 04/26/2011

382 383

05/02/2011

384

05/05/2011

385

05/05/2011

386

05/09/2011

387

05/10/2011

388

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (135 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 56 of 266

Page 55 of 96

Dube. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 5/10/2011. (wh) (Entered: 05/10/2011) 05/11/2011 389 ORDER granting 387 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 5/11/2011. (gm1) (Entered: 05/12/2011) MOTION for Extension of Time/Curfew for Special Event by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 6/9/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Diaz, Richard) Modified Relief on 5/24/2011 (ls). (Entered: 05/23/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 390 MOTION To Extend Curfew for Special Event. Filer Selected the Wrong Motion Relief(s); ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (ls) (Entered: 05/24/2011) Defendant's MOTION to Travel by Marguerite Grandison. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 05/24/2011) Paperless ORDER Denying 392 Motion to Travel as to Marguerite Grandison (5). Defendant filed this motion on May 24, 2011 asking permission to travel on May 26, 2011. Because this motion has been filed so close to the anticipated travel date, this Court is unable to meaningfully confer with the United States Probation Office and the United States Attorney. Thus, this motion is denied.. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 5/24/2011. (wh) (Entered: 05/24/2011) ORDER Regarding The Sequence Of Trials as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/25/2011. (dm) (Entered: 05/27/2011) ORDER Granting 390 Motion for Extension of Time as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 5/31/2011. (wh) (Entered: 05/31/2011) ORDER Granting Motion to Adopt Defendant Esquenazi'a Corrected Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Criminal Offense and Vagueness (D/E 283 ), Motion to Dismiss for Spoliation (D/E 193 ), Motion to Dismiss Cts 9-21 (D/E 268 ), Motion to Reconsider Disqualification of Expert and Motion to Continue Trial Date (D/E 313 ; re 315 Motion to Adopt/Join as to Carlos Rodriguez (2).. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/20/2011. (asl) (Entered: 06/20/2011) ORDER Denying Defendant Joel Esquenazi's Motion to Strike the Government's Money Laundering Expert and Response to Request for Reciprocal Notice for Defense Expert on Haitian Law and Status Report Re: Trial; re 349 Motion to Strike as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/20/2011. (asl) (Entered: 06/20/2011) NOTICE of Reassignment of Assistant US Attorney. James M Koukios appearing for USA. Kevin B. Gerrity terminated (Koukios, James) (Entered: 06/27/2011) Proposed Jury Instructions by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez

05/23/2011

390

05/24/2011

391

05/24/2011 05/24/2011

392 393

05/26/2011

394

05/31/2011 06/20/2011

395 396

06/20/2011

397

06/27/2011

398

07/01/2011

399

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (136 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 57 of 266

Page 56 of 96

(Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 07/01/2011) 07/07/2011 07/07/2011 07/07/2011 400 401 402 NOTICE Corrected Fourth Notice of Reciprocal Discovery by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/07/2011) NOTICE of Fifth Reciprocal Discovery by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/07/2011) Defendant's MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 7/25/2011 (Hernandez, Arturo) Modified on 7/8/2011 (ls). (Entered: 07/07/2011) Proposed Jury Instructions by Carlos Rodriguez (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Foreign Corrupt Practices Act)(Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 07/07/2011) Proposed Jury Instructions by Carlos Rodriguez (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 07/07/2011) MOTION to Adopt/Join 404 Proposed Jury Instructions, 403 Proposed Jury Instructions by Joel Esquenazi as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 7/25/2011 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/08/2011) MOTION for Extension of Time to file proposed jury instructions one day out of time by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 7/25/2011 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/08/2011) Proposed Jury Instructions by Joel Esquenazi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/08/2011) Proposed Jury Instructions by Joel Esquenazi (Attachments: # 1 Supplement) (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/08/2011) RESPONSE/REPLY by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez to 405 MOTION to Adopt/Join 404 Proposed Jury Instructions, 403 Proposed Jury Instructions, 404 Proposed Jury Instructions Objecting to Proposed Instruction Regarding "Foreign Official" and "Instrumentality" (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 07/10/2011) NOTICE of Service of Deposition Designations by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison re 75 Scheduling Order, (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 07/11/2011) Proposed Voir Dire Questions by Carlos Rodriguez (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 07/12/2011) MOTION for Release of Brady Materials by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 7/29/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Diaz, Richard) Modified Relief on 7/13/2011 (ls). (Entered: 07/12/2011) ORDER denying as moot 402 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/12/2011. (wh) (Entered: 07/12/2011) ORDER granting 405 Motion to Adopt/Join as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/12/2011. (wh)

07/07/2011 07/07/2011 07/08/2011

403 404 405

07/08/2011

406

07/08/2011 07/08/2011 07/10/2011

407 408 409

07/11/2011

410

07/12/2011 07/12/2011

411 412

07/12/2011

413

07/12/2011

414

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (137 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 58 of 266

Page 57 of 96

(Entered: 07/12/2011) 07/12/2011 07/12/2011 415 416 ORDER granting 406 Motion for Extension of Time as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/12/2011. (wh) (Entered: 07/12/2011) RESPONSE/REPLY by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez to 405 MOTION to Adopt/Join 404 Proposed Jury Instructions, 403 Proposed Jury Instructions, 403 Proposed Jury Instructions Objecting to Proposed Instructions Regarding (1) Elements of FCPA; (2) "Willfully"; (3) "Corruptly"; and (4) "Knowledge" (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 07/12/2011) SUPPLEMENT to 399 Proposed Jury Instructions filed by USA by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez Memorandum in Support of the Government's Amended Proposed Jury Instructions (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 07/12/2011) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT re 3 Indictment, as to Jean Rene Duperval (4) count(s) 8s-9s, 10s-28s, Marguerite Grandison (5) count(s) 8s-9s, 10s-28s, Washington Vasconez Cruz (6) count(s) 1, 2-7, 8, 10-28, Amadeus Richers (7) count(s) 1, 2-7, 8, 10-28, Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (8) count(s) 1, 2-7, 8, 10-28, Patrick Joseph (9) count(s) 8. Forfeiture Allegations (asl) (Entered: 07/13/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 412 MOTION For Specific Brady Giglio. Filer Selected the Wrong Motion Relief(s); ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (ls) (Entered: 07/13/2011) Criminal Summons Issued in case as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (asl) (Entered: 07/13/2011) NOTICE regarding Superseding Indictment by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Washington Vasconez Cruz, Amadeus Richers, Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc., Patrick Joseph re 419 Indictment, (Koukios, James) (Entered: 07/13/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 422 restricted/sealed until further notice. (asl) (Entered: 07/13/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 423 restricted/sealed until further notice. (asl) (Entered: 07/13/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 424 restricted/sealed until further notice. (asl) (Entered: 07/13/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 425 restricted/sealed until further notice. (asl) (Entered: 07/13/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 426 restricted/sealed until further notice. (asl) (Entered: 07/13/2011)

07/12/2011

417

07/12/2011

419

07/13/2011

418

07/13/2011 07/13/2011

420 421

07/13/2011 07/13/2011 07/13/2011 07/13/2011 07/13/2011

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 07/13/2011 427 Date (138 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 59 of 266

Page 58 of 96

ORDER Requiring Response(s) from AUSA as to Joel Esquenazi re 412 Motion for Release of Brady Materials filed by Joel Esquenazi Responses due by 7/14/2011. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/13/2011. (wh) (Entered: 07/13/2011) MOTION to Amend/Correct 3 Indictment, by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 8/1/2011 (Koukios, James) (Entered: 07/13/2011) RESPONSE/REPLY by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez to 407 Proposed Jury Instructions Objection to Defendant Esquenazi's Proposed Jury Instructions (Koukios, James) (Entered: 07/13/2011) NOTICE of Intent to Use Evidence by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) (Koukios, James) (Entered: 07/13/2011) MOTION in Limine by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 8/1/2011 (Koukios, James) (Entered: 07/13/2011) Proposed Voir Dire Questions by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez (Koukios, James) (Entered: 07/13/2011) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez re 412 Motion for Release of Brady Materials Replies due by 7/25/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 07/14/2011) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Richard Okyere Dansoh appearing for Patrick Joseph (Dansoh, Richard) (Entered: 07/14/2011) MOTION to Exclude 404(b) Evidence Or in the Alternative, Defendant's MOTION to Continue Trial by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 8/1/2011 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/14/2011) RESPONSE in Opposition by Carlos Rodriguez re 183 MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations MOTION to Adopt/Join 171 MOTION to Dismiss 3 Indictment, Based on Expiration of Statute of Limitations, 221 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Banruptcy Deposition and Alternatively to Redact Same (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 07/14/2011) Renewed MOTION to exclude bankruptcy deposition by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 8/1/2011. See image at DE 436 (lk) (Entered: 07/15/2011) Minute Order: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: denying as moot 412 Motion for Release of Brady Materials as to Joel Esquenazi (1); granting without objections 428 Motion to Amend/Correct Indictment as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2); granting in part and denying in part 431 Motion in Limine as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2); Calendar Call held on 7/14/2011; Motions terminated 431 MOTION in Limine filed by USA, 412 Motion for Release of Brady Materials filed by Joel Esquenazi, 428 MOTION to Amend/Correct 3 Indictment, filed by USA Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 07/15/2011)

07/13/2011

428

07/13/2011

429

07/13/2011

430

07/13/2011 07/13/2011 07/14/2011

431 432 433

07/14/2011 07/14/2011

434 435

07/14/2011

436

07/14/2011 07/14/2011

437 442

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 07/15/2011 438 Date (139 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 60 of 266

Page 59 of 96

Clerks Notice to Filer re 436 Response in Opposition,. Two or More Document Events Filed as One; ERROR - Only one event was selected by the Filer but more than one event was applicable to the document filed. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk, see DE 437 . It is not necessary to refile this document but in the future, the Filer must select all applicable events. (lk) (Entered: 07/15/2011) ORDER as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Washington Vasconez Cruz, Amadeus Richers, Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc., Patrick Joseph re 419 Indictment. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/15/2011. (afr) (Entered: 07/15/2011) MOTION in Limine to Use An Excerpt of Defendant Rodriguez's Bankruptcy Deposition in Opening by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 8/1/2011 (Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 07/15/2011) ORDER ON WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS as to the United States, Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/15/2011. (afr) (Entered: 07/15/2011) RESPONSE/REPLY by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez to 411 Proposed Voir Dire Questions (Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 07/15/2011) NOTICE of Compliance by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez re 441 Order (Koukios, James) (Entered: 07/15/2011) NOTICE of Compliance with Court Order by Carlos Rodriguez (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 07/16/2011) NOTICE Of Intent to Refer to Destruction of Evidence Opening Statment by Carlos Rodriguez (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 07/16/2011) NOTICE Of Intent to Refer to Destruction of Evidence in Opening Statement by Carlos Rodriguez (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 07/16/2011) RESPONSE/REPLY by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez to 446 Notice (Other), 447 Notice (Other) (Koukios, James) (Entered: 07/17/2011) MOTION in Limine Concerning Improper References by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 8/4/2011 (Koukios, James) (Entered: 07/17/2011) Witness List by USA (Koukios, James) (Entered: 07/17/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 451 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 07/18/2011)

07/15/2011

439

07/15/2011

440

07/15/2011

441

07/15/2011 07/15/2011 07/16/2011 07/16/2011 07/16/2011 07/17/2011 07/17/2011

443 444 445 446 447 448 449

07/17/2011 07/18/2011 07/18/2011 07/18/2011 07/18/2011

450

452 453 454

EXHIBIT and WITNESS LIST by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/18/2011) NOTICE of Filing Document Underseal by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 07/18/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (140 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 61 of 266

Page 60 of 96

Day #1 begun on 7/18/2011 Joel Esquenazi (1) on Count 1,2-8,9,10-21 and Carlos Rodriguez (2) on Count 1,2-8,9,10-21. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 07/18/2011) 07/18/2011 07/19/2011 455 456 NOTICE of Compliance by Joel Esquenazi re 441 Order (ls)(See Image at DE # 452 ) (Entered: 07/19/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 452 Exhibit and Witness List. Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#455]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 07/19/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 457 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 07/19/2011) 458 459 TRIAL BRIEF by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Koukios, James) (Entered: 07/19/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #2 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 7/19/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov Court Reporter: Apex Court ReportingCharles Dellbridge, 954-467-8204 x1019 (wh) (Entered: 07/20/2011) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 719-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1 / p.m. session, 1-146 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/15/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/25/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/21/2011. (dwh) Modified on 4/13/2012 (wh). (Entered: 07/20/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 461 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 07/20/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 462 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 07/20/2011) 463 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman: Arraignment as to Jean Rene Duperval (4) Count 8s-9s,9,1021,10s-28s held on 7/20/2011. (Digital 10:11:00.) (ail) (Entered: 07/20/2011) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman: Arraignment as to Marguerite Grandison (5) Count 1,2-8,8s9s,9,10-21,10s-28s held on 7/20/2011. (Digital 10:12:35; 10:52:46.) (ail) (Entered: 07/20/2011) ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to counts Jean Rene Duperval (4) Count 8s-9s,9,10-21,10s-28s. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held on 7/20/2011 before Magistrate Judge Jonathan

07/19/2011 07/19/2011 07/19/2011

07/20/2011

460

07/20/2011 07/20/2011 07/20/2011

07/20/2011

464

07/20/2011

465

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (141 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 62 of 266

Page 61 of 96

Goodman. (ail) (Entered: 07/20/2011) 07/20/2011 466 ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to counts Marguerite Grandison (5) Count 1,2-8,8s-9s,9,10-21,10s-28s. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held on 7/20/2011 before Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman. (ail) (Entered: 07/20/2011) STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER as to Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison. All motions concerning matters not covered by this order must be filed within 28 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 7/20/2011. (ail) (Entered: 07/20/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #3 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 7/20/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov; Charles Dellbridge, Apex Court Reporting 954-467-8204 x1019(wh) Modified on 7/20/2011 (wh). (Entered: 07/20/2011) TRIAL BRIEF by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez (Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 07/20/2011) Arrest on 7/20/2011 of Patrick Joseph (ag) (Entered: 07/21/2011) 471 472 Report Commencing Criminal Action as to Patrick Joseph - YOB: **/**/1961 Prisoner #: voluntary surrender (unknown) (ag) (Entered: 07/21/2011) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman: Arraignment as to Patrick Joseph (9) Count 8 held on 7/20/2011, Initial Appearance held on 7/20/2011, Bond Hearing held on 7/20/2011 Special Conditions: a. Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;b. Report to Pretrial Services as directed;n. Home Confinement Program;p. May travel to and from location and must notify Pretrial Services of travel plans before leaving and upon return.;q. Comply with additional conditions of bond. (Digital 13:40:45 / 15:14:20.) (ag) (Entered: 07/21/2011) Order on Initial Appearance as to Patrick Joseph for proceeding held on 7/20/2011 Special Conditions: a. Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;b. Report to Pretrial Services as directed;n. Home Confinement Program;p. May travel to and from location and must notify Pretrial Services of travel plans before leaving and upon return.;q. Comply with additional conditions of bond as to Patrick Joseph (9) Bond set and posted at $250K with 10% and $500K PSB.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 7/20/2011. (ag) Modified signatory on 7/22/2011 (wc). (Entered: 07/21/2011) ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to counts Patrick Joseph (9) Count 8. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held on 7/20/2011 before Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman. (ag) (Entered: 07/21/2011) TRANSCRIPT of Jury Trial P.M. Session as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos

07/20/2011

467

07/20/2011

468

07/20/2011 07/20/2011 07/20/2011 07/20/2011

469

07/20/2011

473

07/20/2011

474

07/21/2011

470

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (142 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 63 of 266

Page 62 of 96

Rodriguez held on 07/19/2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-146 pages, Court Reporter: Charles J. Delbridge-Apex Reporting Group, 954-467-8204 x1019. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/15/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/25/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/24/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Designation Access Form)(amb) (Entered: 07/21/2011) 07/21/2011 475 STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER as to Patrick Joseph. All motions concerning matters not covered by this order must be filed within 28 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 7/20/2011. (ag) (Entered: 07/21/2011) $250,000 10% PSB Bond Entered as to Patrick Joseph Receipt # FLS100022236. Approved by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman Special Conditions: a. Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;b. Report to Pretrial Services as directed;n. Home Confinement Program;p. May travel to and from location and must notify Pretrial Services of travel plans before leaving and upon return.;q. Comply with additional conditions of bond (ag) (Entered: 07/21/2011) $500,000 PSB Bond Entered as to Patrick Joseph Approved by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman Special Conditions: a. Surrender all passports and travel documents to the Pretrial Services Office;b. Report to Pretrial Services as directed;n. Home Confinement Program;p. May travel to and from location and must notify Pretrial Services of travel plans before leaving and upon return.;q. Comply with additional conditions of bond (ag) (Entered: 07/21/2011) TRANSCRIPT of Jury Trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 7/20/11, P.M. Session, before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-97 pages, Court Reporter: Charles J. Delbridge, 954-467-8204 x1019. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/15/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/25/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/24/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Designation Access Form)(hh) (Entered: 07/21/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #4 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 7/21/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov Court Reporter: Charles Dellbridge, Apex Court Reporting, 954-467-8204 x1019 (wh) (Entered: 07/21/2011) TRIAL BRIEF by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez (Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 07/21/2011) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 481 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 07/22/2011) 482 TRANSCRIPT of Jury Trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on

07/21/2011

476

07/21/2011

477

07/21/2011

478

07/21/2011

479

07/21/2011 07/22/2011 07/22/2011

480

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (143 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 64 of 266

Page 63 of 96

7/21/11 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-110 pages, Court Reporter: Charles J. Delbridge, 954-467-8204 x1019. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/15/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/25/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/24/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Designation Access Form) (hh) (Entered: 07/22/2011) 07/22/2011 483 ORDER Granting Ore Tenus Motion to Extend Curfew to Travel for Trial, as to Carlos Rodriguez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/22/2011. (wh) (Entered: 07/22/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #5 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 7/22/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov Court Reporter: Charles Dellbridge, Apex Court Reporting/ 954-467-8204 x1019 (wh) (Entered: 07/22/2011) Proposed Jury Instructions by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez (Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 07/23/2011) NOTICE of Supplemental Exhibit List by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Exhibit List)(Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 07/24/2011) CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance per 481 Sealed Order (nc) (Entered: 07/25/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #6 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 7/25/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 07/25/2011) TRANSCRIPT of Jury Trial P.M. Session as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 07/22/2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-116 pages, Court Reporter: Charles J. Delbridge-Apex Reporting Group, 954-467-8204 x1019. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/18/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/29/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/27/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Designation Access. Form)(amb) (Entered: 07/27/2011) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 720-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-53 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/19/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/29/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/27/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 07/26/2011)

07/22/2011

484

07/23/2011 07/24/2011

485 486

07/25/2011 07/25/2011

487 488

07/25/2011

495

07/26/2011

489

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 07/26/2011 490 Date (144 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 65 of 266

Page 64 of 96

TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 721-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-62 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/19/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/29/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/27/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 07/26/2011) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 722-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-91 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/19/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/29/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/27/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 07/26/2011) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 725-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-73 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/19/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/29/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/27/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 07/26/2011) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 725-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-100 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/19/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/29/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/27/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 07/26/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #7 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 7/26/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov Court Reporter: Charles Dellbridge, Apex Court Reporting 954-467-8204 x1019 (wh) (Entered: 07/26/2011) TRANSCRIPT of Jury Trial P.M. Session as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 07/26/2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-146 pages, Court Reporter: Charles J. Delbridge-Apex Reporting Group, 954-467-8204 x1019. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.

07/26/2011

491

07/26/2011

492

07/26/2011

493

07/26/2011

494

07/27/2011

496

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (145 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 66 of 266

Page 65 of 96

Redaction Request due 8/22/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/1/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/28/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Designation Access Form)(amb) (Entered: 07/27/2011) 07/27/2011 497 Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #8 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 7/27/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov Court Reporter: Charles Dellbridge, Apex Court Reporting 954-467-8204 x1019 (wh) (Entered: 07/28/2011) TRANSCRIPT of Jury Trial P.M. Session as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 07/27/2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-103 pages, Court Reporter: Charles J. Delbridge-Apex Reporting Group, 954-467-8204 x1019. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/22/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/1/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/28/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Designation Access Form)(amb) (Entered: 07/28/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Calendar Call as to Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison held on 7/28/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 07/28/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #9 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 7/28/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov Court Reporter: Charles Dellbridge, Apex Court Reporting 954-467-8204 x1019 (wh) (Entered: 07/28/2011) MOTION in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Defense Witness Frandzi Henry by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 8/15/2011 (Koukios, James) Modified on 7/29/2011 (ls). (Entered: 07/28/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #10 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 7/29/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 07/29/2011) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 07-28-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-104 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/25/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/2/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/31/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 07/30/2011) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 07-29-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-148 pages a.m. session Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 /

07/27/2011

498

07/28/2011

499

07/28/2011

500

07/28/2011

501

07/29/2011

502

07/30/2011

503

07/30/2011

504

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (146 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 67 of 266

Page 66 of 96

Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/25/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/2/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/31/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 07/30/2011) 07/30/2011 505 TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 07-29-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-90 pages pm session, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/25/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/2/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/31/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 07/30/2011) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Paul A. Calli appearing for Patrick Joseph (Calli, Paul) (Entered: 08/01/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #11 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 8/1/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov Court Reporter: Charles Dellbridge, Apex Court Reporting 954-467-8204 x1019 (wh) (Entered: 08/01/2011) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 08-01-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-105 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/26/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/6/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/3/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 08/02/2011) TRANSCRIPT of Jury Trial P.M. Session as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 07/28/2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-83 pages, Court Reporter: Charles J. Delbridge-Apex Reporting Group, 954-467-8204 x1019. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/26/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/6/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/3/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Designation Access Form)(amb) (Entered: 08/02/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #12 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 8/2/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov Court Reporter: Charles Dellbridge, Apex Court Reporting, 954-467-8204 x1019 (wh) (Entered: 08/02/2011)

08/01/2011 08/01/2011

506 507

08/02/2011

508

08/02/2011

509

08/02/2011

510

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 08/02/2011 511 Date (147 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 68 of 266

Page 67 of 96

TRANSCRIPT of Jury Trial P.M. Session as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 08/01/2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-137 pages, Court Reporter: Charles J. Delbridge - Apex Reporting Group, 954-467-8204 x1019. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/26/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/6/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/3/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Designation Access Form)(amb) (Entered: 08/03/2011) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 08-02-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-97 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/29/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/9/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/4/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 08/03/2011) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 08-03-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-82 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/29/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/9/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/4/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 08/03/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day #13 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 8/3/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov Court Reporter: Charles Dellbridge 954-467-8204 x1019 Apex Court Reporting (wh) (Entered: 08/03/2011) TRANSCRIPT of Jury Trial P.M. Session as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 08/02/2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-150 pages, Court Reporter: Charles J. Delbridge-Apex Reporting Group, 954-467-8204 x1019. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/29/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/9/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/7/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Designation Access Form)(amb) (Entered: 08/04/2011) TRANSCRIPT of Jury Trial P.M. Session as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 08/03/2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-137 pages, Court Reporter: Charles J. Delbridge-Apex Reporting Group, 954-467-8204 x1019. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.

08/03/2011

512

08/03/2011

513

08/03/2011

514

08/04/2011

515

08/04/2011

516

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (148 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 69 of 266

Page 68 of 96

Redaction Request due 8/29/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/9/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/7/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Designation Access Form)(amb) (Entered: 08/04/2011) 08/04/2011 517 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial ends, Day #14 as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 8/4/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov; Court Reporter: Charles Dellbridge, Apex Court Reporting, 954-467-8204 x1019 (wh) Modified on 8/5/2011: added second Court Reporter (wc). (Entered: 08/04/2011) NOTICE/ORDER OF SENTENCING; as to Joel Esquenazi Sentencing set for 10/13/2011 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 08/04/2011) NOTICE/ORDER OF SENTENCING; as to Carlos Rodriguez Sentencing set for 10/13/2011 02:00 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 08/04/2011) Court's Final Jury Instructions as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez (wh) (Entered: 08/05/2011) Jury Notes and Court's Response as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez (wh) (Entered: 08/05/2011) JURY VERDICT; as to Joel Esquenazi (1) Guilty on Count 1,2-8,9,10-21 (wh) (Entered: 08/05/2011) JURY VERDICT; as to Carlos Rodriguez (2) Guilty on Count 1,2-8,9,10-21 (wh) (Entered: 08/05/2011) RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by USA as to Patrick Joseph (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Mrazek, Nicola) Modified on 8/8/2011 (ls). (Entered: 08/05/2011) STIPULATION Permitting Withdrawal of Exhibits as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/4/2011. (asl) (Entered: 08/08/2011) Unopposed MOTION to Travel by Marguerite Grandison. (Vereen, Roderick) Modified Text on 8/9/2011 (ls). (Entered: 08/08/2011) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 08-04-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-60 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 9/1/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/12/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/10/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 08/08/2011) ORDER granting 526 Motion to Travel as to Marguerite Grandison (5). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/10/2011. (wh) (Entered: 08/10/2011)

08/04/2011

518

08/04/2011

519

08/05/2011 08/05/2011 08/05/2011 08/05/2011 08/05/2011

520 521 522 523 524

08/05/2011

525

08/08/2011 08/08/2011

526 527

08/10/2011

528

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 08/10/2011 08/10/2011 08/10/2011 08/10/2011 08/10/2011 529 530 531 532 533 Date (149 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 70 of 266

Page 69 of 96

EXHIBIT and WITNESS LIST by Joel Esquenazi (wh) (Entered: 08/10/2011) EXHIBIT LIST by USA as to Joel Esquenazi et al., (wh) (Entered: 08/10/2011) GOVERNMENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT LIST by USA as to Joel Esquenazi et al., (wh) Modified on 8/10/2011 (wh). (Entered: 08/10/2011) GOVERNMENT'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT LIST by USA as to Joel Esquenazi et al., (wh) (Entered: 08/10/2011) MOTION for Reconsideration of Order of Remand, MOTION for Bond by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 8/29/2011 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 08/10/2011) EXHIBIT and WITNESS LIST by Carlos Rodriguez (wh) (Entered: 08/12/2011) Arrest Warrant returned executed on 7/20/11 as to Patrick Joseph re 424 Arrest Warrant Issued (asl) (Entered: 08/15/2011) Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions by Patrick Joseph. Responses due by 9/2/2011 (Calli, Paul) (Entered: 08/16/2011) ORDER GRANTING; as to Patrick Joseph re 536 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions filed by Patrick Joseph, Pretrial Motions due by 10/3/2011. Motions terminated as to Patrick Joseph: 536 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions filed by Patrick Joseph. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/17/2011. (wh) (Entered: 08/17/2011) MOTION to Adopt/Join 536 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions by Jean Rene Duperval as to Patrick Joseph. Responses due by 9/6/2011 (Bergendahl, John) Modified Parties on 8/18/2011 (ls). (Entered: 08/17/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 538 MOTION to Adopt/Join 536 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions MOTION to Adopt/Join 536 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions. Wrong Defendant Selected; ERROR - The filer selected the Master Case, instead of the applicable defendant. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 08/18/2011) ORDER Requiring Response(s) from AUSA as to Joel Esquenazi re 533 MOTION for Reconsideration of Order of Remand MOTION for Bond filed by Joel Esquenazi Responses due by 8/29/2011. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/19/2011. (wh) (Entered: 08/19/2011) ORDER granting 538 Motion to Adopt/Join as to Jean Rene Duperval (4). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/23/2011. (wh) (Entered: 08/23/2011)

08/12/2011 08/15/2011 08/16/2011

534 535 536

08/17/2011

537

08/17/2011

538

08/18/2011

539

08/19/2011

540

08/23/2011

541

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 08/24/2011 542 Date (150 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 71 of 266

Page 70 of 96

Defendant's MOTION for Acquittal by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 9/12/2011 (Anderson, Rhonda) Modified Relief on 8/25/2011 (ls). Added MOTION for New Trial on 8/25/2011 (ls). (Entered: 08/24/2011) Defendant's MOTION for Acquittal by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 9/12/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Anderson, Rhonda). Added MOTION for New Trial based upon Newly Discovered Evidence on 8/25/2011 (ls). (Entered: 08/24/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 542 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment NOV and for New Trial. Motion with Multiple Reliefs Filed as One Relief; ERROR The Filer selected only one relief event and failed to select the additional corresponding events for each relief requested in the motion. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual.Filer Selected the Wrong Motion Relief(s); ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (ls) (Entered: 08/25/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 543 Defendant's MOTION for New Trial or Judgment of Acquittal based upon Newly Discovered Evidence. Motion with Multiple Reliefs Filed as One Relief; ERROR - The Filer selected only one relief event and failed to select the additional corresponding events for each relief requested in the motion. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (ls) (Entered: 08/25/2011) MOTION to Adopt/Join 542 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial by Joel Esquenazi as to Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 9/12/2011 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 08/25/2011) MOTION to Adopt/Join 543 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial based upon Newly Discovered Evidence by Joel Esquenazi as to Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 9/12/2011 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 08/25/2011) NOTICE OF HEARING; as to Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Washington Vasconez Cruz, Amadeus Richers, Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc., Patrick Joseph Status Conference set for 8/31/2011 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 08/26/2011) Supplemental RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Washington Vasconez Cruz, Amadeus Richers, Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc., Patrick Joseph (Attachments: # 1 HL000115-119)(Koukios, James) (Entered: 08/29/2011) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Joel Esquenazi re 533 MOTION for Reconsideration of Order of Remand MOTION for Bond Replies due by

08/24/2011

543

08/25/2011

544

08/25/2011

545

08/25/2011

546

08/25/2011

547

08/26/2011

548

08/29/2011

549

08/29/2011

550

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (151 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 72 of 266

Page 71 of 96

9/9/2011. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 08/29/2011) 08/30/2011 551 Supplemental MOTION for Reconsideration re 533 MOTION for Reconsideration of Order of Remand MOTION for Bond filed by Joel Esquenazi by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 9/16/2011 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 08/30/2011) SUPPLEMENT to 533 MOTION for Reconsideration of Order of Remand MOTION for Bond filed by Joel Esquenazi by Joel Esquenazi (ls)(See Image at DE # 551 ) (Entered: 08/31/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 551 Supplemental MOTION for Reconsideration re 533 MOTION for Reconsideration of Order of Remand MOTION for Bond filed by Joel Esquenazi. Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#552]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 08/31/2011) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Joel Esquenazi re 533 MOTION for Reconsideration of Order of Remand MOTION for Bond (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 08/31/2011) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Status Conference as to Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Patrick Joseph held on 8/31/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 08/31/2011) MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Ivan S. Fisher. Filing Fee $75.00. Receipt # 24483. Responses due by 9/19/2011 (ksa) (Entered: 09/01/2011) ORDER SETTING CRIMINAL TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE as to Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Patrick Joseph Calendar Call set for 2/23/2012 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Jury Trial set for 2/27/2012 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/31/2011. (wh) (Entered: 09/01/2011) TRANSCRIPT of status conference as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 8-312011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-10 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 9/26/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 10/6/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/5/2011. (dwh) (Entered: 09/01/2011) Defendant's MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Patrick Joseph. (Calli, Paul) (Entered: 09/01/2011) ORDER denying 533 Motion for Reconsideration as to Joel Esquenazi (1); denying 533 Motion for Bond as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose

08/30/2011

552

08/31/2011

553

08/31/2011

554

08/31/2011

555

08/31/2011

558

09/01/2011

556

09/01/2011

557

09/01/2011 09/07/2011

559 560

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (152 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 73 of 266

Page 72 of 96

E. Martinez on 9/7/2011. (wh) (Entered: 09/07/2011) 09/12/2011 561 RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez re 547 MOTION to Adopt/Join 543 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial based upon Newly Discovered Evidence, 543 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial based upon Newly Discovered Evidence, 546 MOTION to Adopt/Join 542 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial, 542 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial (Mrazek, Nicola) (Entered: 09/12/2011) MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 9/30/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mrazek, Nicola) Modified Text on 9/14/2011 (ls). (Entered: 09/13/2011) SUPPLEMENT to 561 Response in Opposition, filed by USA by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez Exhibit 1 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1) (Koukios, James) (Entered: 09/13/2011) ORDER Denying without prejudice 558 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. Attorney Paul A. Calli. as to Patrick Joseph (9); Granting 559 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney Paul A. Calli withdrawn from case. as to Patrick Joseph (9). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/14/2011. (wh) (Entered: 09/14/2011) OBJECTIONS TO PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 09/14/2011) Joint MOTION for Hearing/Status Conference and Briefing Schedule by Carlos Rodriguez (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Hernandez, Arturo) Modified to convert document to a motion on 9/15/2011 (ls). (Entered: 09/14/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 566 Status Report. Wrong Event Selected Document is a Motion; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. A motion event must always be selected when filing a motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 09/15/2011) MOTION to Continue Sentencing by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 10/3/2011 (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 09/15/2011) ORDER; granting 562 Motion for Leave to File oversized brief as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/15/2011. (asl) (Entered: 09/15/2011) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez re 568 MOTION to Continue Sentencing Replies due by 9/30/2011. (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 09/20/2011) ORDER Denying 568 Motion to Continue Sentencing as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/20/2011. (wh) (Entered: 09/20/2011)

09/13/2011

562

09/13/2011

563

09/14/2011

564

09/14/2011 09/14/2011

565 566

09/15/2011

567

09/15/2011 09/15/2011

568 569

09/20/2011

570

09/20/2011

571

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 09/22/2011 572 Date (153 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 74 of 266

Page 73 of 96

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to 561 Response in Opposition, to Defendants' Motions for Judgment of Acquittal or New Trial by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 10/11/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Anderson, Rhonda) (Entered: 09/22/2011) ORDER Granting 572 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply as to Carlos Rodriguez (2) Replies due by 9/26/2011. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/23/2011. (wh) (Entered: 09/23/2011) OBJECTIONS TO PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT by Carlos Rodriguez (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 09/23/2011) MOTION for Variance and/or Downward Departure from the Advisory Guideline Sentence by Carlos Rodriguez (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (Hernandez, Arturo) Modified to convert document to a motion on 9/26/2011 (ls). (Entered: 09/23/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 575 Sentencing Memorandum. Wrong Event Selected - Document is a Motion; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. A motion event must always be selected when filing a motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 09/26/2011) MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to 542 Defendant's MOTION for Acquittal, MOTION for New Trial by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 10/14/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Anderson, Rhonda) Modified Link on 9/27/2011 (ls). Modified on 9/27/2011 (ls). (Entered: 09/26/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 577 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply to Government's Consolidated Response (ECF No. 561). Document Not Linked; ERROR - The filed document was not linked to the related docket entry. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 09/27/2011) ORDER Granting 577 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply as to Carlos Rodriguez (2) Replies due by 9/28/2011. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 9/27/2011. (wh) (Entered: 09/27/2011) Set/Reset Deadlines re Motion in case as to Carlos Rodriguez re 542 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial, and 543 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial based upon Newly Discovered Evidence. Replies due by 9/28/2011. (See DE# 579 .) (wc) (Entered: 09/28/2011)

09/23/2011

573

09/23/2011 09/23/2011

574 575

09/26/2011

576

09/26/2011

577

09/27/2011

578

09/27/2011

579

09/27/2011

09/28/2011

580

REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Carlos Rodriguez re 542 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial, 543 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial based upon Newly Discovered Evidence (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - First Decl, # 2 Exhibit B - Second Decl, # 3 Exhibit C - Comparison 2d Decl to Lissade, # 4 Exhibit D - Klugh Letter, # 5 Exhibit E - Bellerive Letter, # 6 Exhibit F- Girard Haiti Bk Excerpt, # 7 Exhibit G- Articles re Viettel Purchase Teleco, # 8 Exhibit H - Carson Govt Memo re FCPA Jury Instr) (Anderson, Rhonda) Modified Link/Text on 9/29/2011 (ls). (Entered: 09/28/2011)

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 09/28/2011 581 Date (154 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 75 of 266

Page 74 of 96

Defendant's MOTION to Compel Discovery by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 10/17/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - First Decl, # 2 Exhibit B Second Decl, # 3 Exhibit C - Comparison 2d Decl to Lissade, # 4 Exhibit D Klugh Letter, # 5 Exhibit E - Bellerive Letter, # 6 Exhibit F- Girard Haiti Bk Excerpt, # 7 Exhibit G- Articles re Viettel Purchase Teleco)(Anderson, Rhonda). Added Renewed MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing regarding Newly Discovered Evidence on 9/29/2011 (ls). Modified Relief on 9/29/2011 (ls). (Entered: 09/28/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 581 Defendant's MOTION for Discovery RENEWED REQUEST FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING REGARDING NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE, AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW. Motion with Multiple Reliefs Filed as One Relief; ERROR - The Filer selected only one relief event and failed to select the additional corresponding events for each relief requested in the motion. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (ls) (Entered: 09/29/2011) SUPPLEMENT by Carlos Rodriguez Supplemental Submission of Letters of Recommendation and Periodicals (Attachments: # 1 Supplement exhibits in support of sentencing)(Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 09/30/2011) RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Washington Vasconez Cruz, Amadeus Richers, Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc., Patrick Joseph re 566 Joint Motion for Hearing/Status Conference and Briefing Schedule (Koukios, James) (Entered: 09/30/2011) MOTION for Bond Pending Appeal by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 10/20/2011 (Anderson, Rhonda) Modified on 10/3/2011 (ls). Modified/reopened on 10/31/2011 (dgj). (Entered: 10/01/2011) MOTION to Adopt/Join 580 Reply to Response,, by Joel Esquenazi as to Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 10/20/2011 (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 10/03/2011) NOTICE of Filing Certificate of Good Standing by Patrick Joseph (Attachments: # 1 Certification)(Dansoh, Richard) (Entered: 10/03/2011) RESPONSE to 565 Objections to Presentence Investigation Report by USA as to Joel Esquenazi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 700N)(Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 10/03/2011) RESPONSE to 574 Objections to Presentence Investigation Report by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 700N)(Koukios, James) (Entered: 10/03/2011) RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez re 575 Motion for Variance and/or Downward Departure from the Advisory Guideline Sentence (Koukios, James) (Entered: 10/03/2011) Defendant's MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release by Marguerite

09/29/2011

582

09/30/2011

583

09/30/2011

584

10/01/2011

585

10/03/2011

586

10/03/2011 10/03/2011

587 588

10/03/2011

589

10/03/2011

590

10/04/2011

591

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (155 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 76 of 266

Page 75 of 96

Grandison. Responses due by 10/21/2011 (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 10/04/2011) 10/04/2011 592 RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez re 581 Motion to Compel DiscoveryRenewed MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing regarding Newly Discovered Evidence (Koukios, James) (Entered: 10/04/2011) NOTICE of Filing Letters in Support of Sentencing by Joel Esquenazi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letters, # 2 Exhibit Letters)(Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 10/05/2011) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Joel Hirschhorn appearing for Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 10/06/2011) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Carlos Rodriguez re 575 Motion for Variance and/or Downward Departure from the Advisory Guideline Sentence (Hernandez, Arturo) (Entered: 10/06/2011) Stipulation/MOTION for Substitution of Counsel by Joel Esquenazi (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosen, Michael) Modified to convert document to a motion on 10/7/2011 (ls). (Entered: 10/06/2011) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Michael James Rosen appearing for Joel Esquenazi (Rosen, Michael) (Entered: 10/07/2011) Unopposed MOTION to Continue Sentencing by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 10/24/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosen, Michael) (Entered: 10/07/2011) RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez re 543 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial based upon Newly Discovered Evidence, 542 Motion for Acquittal MOTION for New Trial Second (Koukios, James) Modified on 10/11/2011 (ls). (Entered: 10/07/2011) RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez re 585 MOTION for Bond Pending Appeal (Koukios, James) (Entered: 10/07/2011) WAIVER of Speedy Trial by Jean Rene Duperval (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 10/07/2011) RESPONSE by Carlos Rodriguez to Addendum to the PSR (Hernandez, Arturo) Modified on 10/11/2011 (ls). (Entered: 10/10/2011) Supplemental OBJECTIONS TO PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT by Joel Esquenazi (Rosen, Michael) Modified Text on 10/13/2011 (ls). (Entered: 10/12/2011) ORDER Granting 596 Motion for Substitution of Counsel, as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/13/2011. (wh) (Entered: 10/13/2011) ORDER GRANTING; as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez re 598 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Sentencing filed by Joel Esquenazi. Sentencing reset as to Joel Esquenazi on 10/25/2011 09:30 AM and Carlos Rodriguez at 10:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez.

10/05/2011

593

10/06/2011 10/06/2011

594 595

10/06/2011

596

10/07/2011 10/07/2011

597 598

10/07/2011

599

10/07/2011 10/07/2011 10/10/2011 10/12/2011

600 601 602 603

10/13/2011

604

10/13/2011

605

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (156 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 77 of 266

Page 76 of 96

Motions terminated as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez: 598 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Sentencing filed by Joel Esquenazi. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/13/2011. (wh) (Entered: 10/13/2011) 10/13/2011 606 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Peter R. Palermo: Arraignment as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (8) Count 1,2-7,8,10-28 held on 10/13/2011, Initial Appearance as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. held on 10/13/2011. (Digital 10:11:28.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter R. Palermo on 10/13/2011. (aw) (Entered: 10/13/2011) ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to counts Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (8) Count 1,2-7,8,10-28. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held on 10/13/2011 before Magistrate Judge Peter R. Palermo. (asl) (Entered: 10/13/2011) STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc.. All motions concerning matters not covered by this order must be filed within 28 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter R. Palermo on 10/13/2011. (asl) (Entered: 10/13/2011) ORDER Denying Defendants' Motion for Judgment of Acquittal or New Trial; denying 542 Motion for Acquittal as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); denying 543 Motion for Acquittal as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); denying 542 Motion for New Trial as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); denying 543 Motion for New Trial as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); granting 546 Motion to Adopt/Join as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); granting 547 Motion to Adopt/Join as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); denying 566 Motion for Hearing as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); denying 581 Motion to Compel as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); denying 581 Motion for Hearing as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); granting 586 Motion to Adopt/Join as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/12/2011. (asl) (Entered: 10/14/2011) WAIVER of Speedy Trial by Patrick Joseph (Dansoh, Richard) (Entered: 10/17/2011) ORDER REFERRING MOTION as to Marguerite Grandison 591 Defendant's MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release filed by Marguerite Grandison Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/17/2011. (wh) (Entered: 10/18/2011) WAIVER of Speedy Trial by Marguerite Grandison (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 10/19/2011) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Carlos Rodriguez re 585 MOTION for Bond Pending Appeal (Anderson, Rhonda) (Entered: 10/20/2011) Return of Service Executed on 09/29/11 re 182 JUDGMENT as to Robert Antoine (3), Count(s) 9, Imprisonment for a term of 48 months followed by a term of 3 years Supervised Release for sentencing held on 6/9/2010 Restitution: $1,852,209.39 Assessment: $100.00. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/9/2010. (ail) Service information - MCA, McRae, Georgia (asl) (Entered: 10/20/2011)

10/13/2011

607

10/13/2011

608

10/13/2011

609

10/17/2011 10/18/2011

610 611

10/19/2011 10/20/2011 10/20/2011

612 613 614

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 10/21/2011 615 Date (157 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 78 of 266

Page 77 of 96

MOTION for Forfeiture of Property by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 11/7/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Grove, Daren) (Entered: 10/21/2011) RESPONSE to 603 Objections to Presentence Investigation Report by USA as to Joel Esquenazi (Koukios, James) (Entered: 10/21/2011) RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by USA as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Koukios, James) Modified on 10/24/2011 (ls). (Entered: 10/21/2011) SENTENCING MEMORANDUM by Joel Esquenazi (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Composite A, # 2 Exhibit Composite B)(Rosen, Michael) (Entered: 10/21/2011) SUPPLEMENT to 575 MOTION for Variance and/or Downward Departure by Carlos Rodriguez (Hernandez, Arturo) Modified Link on 10/24/2011 (ls). (Entered: 10/21/2011) MOTION for Downward Departure and/or Variance by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 11/10/2011 (Rosen, Michael) (Entered: 10/22/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 619 Supplement. Document Not Linked; ERROR The filed document was not linked to the related docket entry. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 10/24/2011) ORDER STRIKING 593 Notice of Filing Character Reference Letters in Support of his Sentence, that are not in English, filed by Joel Esquenazi as to Joel Esquenazi. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/24/2011. (wh) (Entered: 10/24/2011) ORDER OF FORFEITURE; re 615 Motion for Forfeiture of Property as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/24/2011. (asl) (Entered: 10/24/2011) ORDER denying 591 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Marguerite Grandison(5). Defendant filed this motion asking the Court to remove the condition that she wear an ankle monitor due to financial hardship. After reviewing the file in this cause this motion is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 10/25/2011. (lfz) (Entered: 10/25/2011) Minute Order: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: granting 620 Motion for Downward Departure as to Joel Esquenazi (1); Sentencing held on 10/25/2011 as to Joel Esquenazi. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 10/25/2011) Minute Order: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Granting 575 Motion for Downward Departure as to Carlos Rodriguez (2); Sentencing held on 10/25/2011 as to Carlos Rodriguez. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 10/25/2011)

10/21/2011 10/21/2011

616 617

10/21/2011

618

10/21/2011

619

10/22/2011 10/24/2011

620 621

10/24/2011

622

10/24/2011

623

10/25/2011

624

10/25/2011

625

10/25/2011

626

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 10/26/2011 627 Date (158 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 79 of 266

Page 78 of 96

ORDER REFERRING MOTION as to Carlos Rodriguez 585 MOTION for Bond Pending Appeal filed by Carlos Rodriguez Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/26/2011. (wh) (Entered: 10/26/2011) JUDGMENT as to Carlos Rodriguez (2), Count(s) 1, 2-8, Imprisonment: 60 months, all to be served concurrently. Surrender date 11/30/11 by 2:00 p.m. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: $2,200,00.; Count(s) 10-21, 9, Imprisonment: 24 months, all to be served concurrently. Surrender date 11/30/11 by 2:00 p.m. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: $2,200,00. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/26/2011. (asl) (Entered: 10/26/2011) JUDGMENT as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Count(s) 1, 2-8, Imprisonment: 60 months, to be served concurrently to each other. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,000.; Count(s) 10-21, 9, Imprisonment: 120 months to be served concurrently to each other and consecutively to Counts 1 through 8. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Restitution: $2,200,000 Assessment: $2,100. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/26/2011. (asl) (Entered: 10/26/2011) MOTION to Amend/Correct 628 Judgment,, by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 11/14/2011 (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 10/27/2011) ORDER on motion for judgment of acquittal or new trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Washington Vasconez Cruz, Amadeus Richers, Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc., Patrick Joseph re 580 Reply to Response filed by Carlos Rodriguez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/27/2011. (asl) (Entered: 10/27/2011) ORDER denying 585 Motion for Bond. Defendant Carlos Rodriguez (2) filed this motion asking the Court to permit bond pending appeal. After reviewing the file in this cause, this motion is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 10/31/2011. (lfz) (Entered: 10/31/2011) MOTION to Amend/Correct 628 Judgment, 629 Judgment to Reflect Order of Forfeiture by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 11/17/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Grove, Daren) Modified Link/Text on 11/1/2011 (ls). (Entered: 10/31/2011) Clerks Notice to Filer re 633 MOTION to Amend/Correct 623 Order on Motion for Forfeiture of Property Order of Forfeiture. Incorrect Document Link; ERROR - The filed document was not correctly linked to the related docket entry. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (ls) (Entered: 11/01/2011) ORDER Granting 630 Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/3/2011. (wh) (Entered: 11/03/2011)

10/26/2011

628

10/26/2011

629

10/27/2011 10/27/2011

630 631

10/31/2011

632

10/31/2011

633

11/01/2011

634

11/03/2011

635

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 11/03/2011 636 Date (159 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 80 of 266

Page 79 of 96

ORDER Granting 633 Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/3/2011. (wh) (Entered: 11/03/2011) AMENDED JUDGMENT as to Carlos Rodriguez (2), Count(s) 1, 2-8, Imprisonment: 60 months, all to be served concurrently. Surrender date 11/30/11 by 2:00 p.m. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,00.; Count(s) 10-21, 9, Imprisonment: 24 months, all to be served concurrently. Surrender date 11/30/11 by 2:00 p.m. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,00. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/3/2011. (asl) (Entered: 11/03/2011) AMENDED JUDGMENT as to Joel Esquenazi (1), Count(s) 1, 2-8, Imprisonment: 60 months, to be served concurrently to each other. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,000.; Count(s) 10-21, 9, Imprisonment: 120 months to be served concurrently to each other and consecutively to Counts 1 through 8. Supervised Release: 3 years, all to run concurrently. Assessment: $2,100. Restitution: 2,200,000.. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/3/2011. (asl) (Entered: 11/03/2011) APPEAL of Magistrate Judge 632 Order on Motion for Bond, to District Court Robert L. Dube (Anderson, Rhonda) (Entered: 11/06/2011) NOTICE OF APPEAL by Joel Esquenazi re 629 Judgment,, 625 Order on Motion for Downward Departure, Sentencing,, 638 Amended Judgment,, 609 Order on Motion for Acquittal, Order on Motion for New Trial,,, Order on Motion to Adopt/Join,, Order on Motion for Hearing, Order on Motion to Compel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under Transcript Information. (Rosen, Michael) (Entered: 11/07/2011) Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Judgments, Order Under Appeal and Docket Sheet as to Joel Esquenazi to US Court of Appeals re 640 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment,, (amb) (Entered: 11/08/2011)

11/03/2011

637

11/03/2011

638

11/06/2011 11/07/2011

639 640

11/08/2011

11/09/2011 11/09/2011

641 642

NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Lauren Lisette Valiente appearing for Carlos Rodriguez (Valiente, Lauren) (Entered: 11/09/2011) NOTICE OF APPEAL by Carlos Rodriguez re 628 Judgment,, 623 Order on Motion for Forfeiture of Property, 637 Amended Judgment,, 632 Order on Motion for Bond, 631 Order,. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under Transcript Information. (Valiente, Lauren) (Entered: 11/09/2011) Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Judgments, Orders Under Appeal and Docket Sheet as to Carlos Rodriguez to US Court of Appeals re 642 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment, (amb) (Entered: 11/09/2011)

11/09/2011

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 11/09/2011 643 Date (160 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 81 of 266

Page 80 of 96

USCA Appeal Fees received $ 455.00, receipt number FLS100028349 as to Carlos Rodriguez re 642 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment, : (amb) (Entered: 11/09/2011) USCA Appeal Fees received $ 455.00, receipt number FLS100028380 as to Joel Esquenazi re 640 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment,, : (amb) (Entered: 11/10/2011) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Daniel S. Kahn appearing for USA. (Kahn, Daniel) (Entered: 11/10/2011) TRANSCRIPT of sentencing hearing as to Joel Esquenazi held on 10-252011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-71 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/12/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/22/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/21/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 11/17/2011) TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM as to Joel Esquenazi re 640 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment,, filed by Joel Esquenazi. Sentencing Hearing transcript(s) ordered. Order placed by Michael J. Rosen. Email sent to Court Reporter Coordinator. (Rosen, Michael) (Entered: 11/17/2011) MOTION to Stay Order to Surrender Pending Appeal of Magistrate's Denial of Bond by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 12/5/2011 (Hernandez, Arturo) Modified Text on 11/21/2011 (ls). (Entered: 11/18/2011) RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Carlos Rodriguez re 639 APPEAL of Magistrate Judge 632 Order on Motion for Bond, to District Court Robert L. Dube (Koukios, James) (Entered: 11/21/2011) ORDER Denying 639 Appeal/Objection of Magistrate Judge Order to District Court as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/21/2011. (wh) (Entered: 11/21/2011) TRANSCRIPT of sentencing hearing as to Carlos Rodriguez held on 10-252011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-43 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/15/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/27/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/24/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 11/21/2011) TRANSCRIPT NOTIFICATION as to Joel Esquenazi - has/have been filed by Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov re 647 Transcript Information Form,. (dwh) (Entered: 11/21/2011)

11/10/2011

644

11/10/2011 11/17/2011

645 646

11/17/2011

647

11/18/2011

648

11/21/2011

649

11/21/2011

650

11/21/2011

651

11/21/2011

652

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 11/21/2011 653 Date (161 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 82 of 266

Page 81 of 96

NOTICE of Intent to Introduce Foreign Records of Regularly Conducted Activity by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Washington Vasconez Cruz, Amadeus Richers, Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc., Patrick Joseph (Kahn, Daniel) (Entered: 11/21/2011) TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM as to Carlos Rodriguez re 642 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment, filed by Carlos Rodriguez. Sentence 10/25/2011 transcript(s) ordered. Order placed by Lauren Valiente. Email sent to Court Reporter Coordinator. (Valiente, Lauren) (Entered: 11/22/2011) MOTION for Reconsideration re 650 Order on Appeal/Objection of Magistrate Judge Order to District Court by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 12/12/2011 (Valiente, Lauren) (Entered: 11/23/2011) MOTION to Stay Order of Surrender Pending Resolution of Issues Relating to Motion for Bond Pending Appeal by the District Court and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 12/12/2011 (Valiente, Lauren) (Entered: 11/23/2011) ORDER Denying 648 Motion to Stay as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/28/2011. (wh) (Entered: 11/28/2011) Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA as to Joel Esquenazi re 640 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment,, date received by USCA: 11/14/2011. USCA Case Number: 11-15331-C. (amb) (Entered: 11/29/2011) Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA as to Carlos Rodriguez re 642 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment, date received by USCA: 11/16/2011. USCA Case Number: 11-15331-C. (amb) (Entered: 11/29/2011) ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Carlos Rodriguez's Motion for Reconsideration with Respect to Order Denying Magistrate's Text Order Denying Motion for Bond Pending Appeal; re 655 Motion for Reconsideration as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/30/2011. (asl) (Entered: 11/30/2011) NOTICE of Withdrawal of Counsel by Joel Esquenazi (Diaz, Richard) (Entered: 11/30/2011) AMENDED ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR BOND PENDING APPEAL as to Carlos Rodriguez re 585 MOTION for Bond Pending Appeal filed by Carlos Rodriguez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert L. Dube on 11/30/2011. (gm1) (Entered: 11/30/2011) Paperless ORDER denying 656 Motion to Stay as to Carlos Rodriguez (2). After careful consideration, this Court finds that a stay of the Order of Surrender is not warranted. The Motion for Reconsideration has been ruled on (D.E. No. 660) and the Motion for Bond Pending Appeal was referred back to Judge Dube who has entered an order (D.E. No. 662) which includes an explanation of his reasoning for denial of the Motion for Bond Pending Appeal.. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/30/2011. (jci) (Entered: 11/30/2011)

11/22/2011

654

11/23/2011

655

11/23/2011

656

11/28/2011 11/29/2011

657 658

11/29/2011

659

11/30/2011

660

11/30/2011 11/30/2011

661 662

11/30/2011

663

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 12/05/2011 664 Date (162 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 83 of 266

Page 82 of 96

ORDER of USCA (certified copy)DENYING Rodriguez's motion to stay his surrender date. This denial is without prejudice to Rodriguez's right to apply to this Court for release pending appeal upon disposition of the "Motion for Reconsideration and for Further Findings...". The district court is instructed to resolve the motion without delay as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez re 642 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment, 640 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment. USCA #11-15331-C (amb) (Entered: 12/06/2011) ORDER SETTING CRIMINAL TRIAL DATE: as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. Calendar Call set for 12/15/2011 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Jury Trial set for 12/19/2011 09:30 AM before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/13/2011. (wh) (Entered: 12/13/2011) Unopposed MOTION for Judicial Recommendation re Prisoner Location re 638 Amended Judgment,, by Joel Esquenazi. Responses due by 12/30/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosen, Michael) Modified on 12/14/2011 (ls). (Entered: 12/13/2011) ORDER Denying 666 Motion for Judicial Recommendation Regarding Prisoner Location as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/14/2011. (wh) (Entered: 12/14/2011) RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 12/15/2011) MOTION to Exclude Expert Testimony by USA as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Robert Antoine, Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Washington Vasconez Cruz, Amadeus Richers, Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc., Patrick Joseph. Responses due by 1/3/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit E-mail)(Kahn, Daniel) Modified Text on 12/16/2011 (ls). (Entered: 12/15/2011) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Calendar Call as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. held on 12/15/2011. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 12/15/2011) MOTION to Continue Trial and Toll Application of Speedy Trial Act by USA as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc.. Responses due by 1/3/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit E-mail, # 2 Exhibit E-mail)(Kahn, Daniel) (Entered: 12/15/2011) NOTICE of Filing Proposed Order by USA as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 671 MOTION to Continue Trial and Toll Application of Speedy Trial Act (Kahn, Daniel) (Entered: 12/15/2011) NOTICE of Filing Proposed Order by USA as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 672 Notice (Other), 671 MOTION to Continue Trial and Toll Application of Speedy Trial Act (Kahn, Daniel) Modified on 12/19/2011 (ls). (Entered: 12/16/2011) ORDER Requiring Response(s) from Cinergy Telecommunicatiojns, Inc as to

12/13/2011

665

12/13/2011

666

12/14/2011

667

12/15/2011 12/15/2011

668 669

12/15/2011

670

12/15/2011

671

12/15/2011

672

12/16/2011

673

12/16/2011

674

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (163 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 84 of 266

Page 83 of 96

Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 669 MOTION to Exclude Expert Testimony filed by USA Responses due by 12/19/2011 by 9:00 a.m.. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/15/2011. (wh) (Entered: 12/16/2011) 12/16/2011 675 RESPONSE to Motion by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 671 MOTION to Continue Trial and Toll Application of Speedy Trial Act Replies due by 12/27/2011. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 12/16/2011) NOTICE of filing Proposed Order by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 675 Response to Motion (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 12/16/2011) ORDER TO CONTINUE - Ends of Justice as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. Time excluded from 12/15/2011 until 2/27/2012. Calendar Call set for 2/23/2012 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez., Jury Trial set for 2/27/2012 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. Motions terminated as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc.: 671 MOTION to Continue Trial and Toll Application of Speedy Trial Act filed by USA. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/16/2011. (wh) (Entered: 12/16/2011) NOTICE of Proposed Voir Dire Questions by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 12/17/2011) Defendant's MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release by Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 1/9/2012 (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 12/21/2011) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Marguerite Grandison re 679 Defendant's MOTION to Modify Conditions of Release Replies due by 1/3/2012. (Kahn, Daniel) (Entered: 12/21/2011) ORDER; granting 679 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release as to Marguerite Grandison (5). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/22/2011. (asl) (Entered: 12/22/2011) NOTICE of Second Response to Standing Discovery Order by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 12/27/2011) Third RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 12/29/2011) NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jake Matthew Greenberg appearing for Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Greenberg, Jake) (Entered: 01/18/2012) SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT re 419 Indictment, 3 Indictment, as to Jean Rene Duperval (4) count(s) 8ss-9ss, 10ss-28ss, Marguerite Grandison (5) count(s) 8ss-9ss, 10ss-28ss, Washington Vasconez Cruz (6) count(s) 1s, 2s-7s, 8s, 10s-28s, Amadeus Richers (7) count(s) 1s, 2s-7s, 8s, 10s-28s, Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (8) count(s) 1s, 2s-7s, 8s, 10s28s, Patrick Joseph (9) count(s) 8s, Cecilia Zurita (10) count(s) 1, 4-7, 8, 1028. Forfeiture Allegations (asl) (Entered: 01/20/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 686 restricted/sealed until further notice.

12/16/2011 12/16/2011

676 677

12/17/2011 12/21/2011

678 679

12/21/2011

680

12/22/2011

681

12/27/2011 12/29/2011 01/18/2012

682 683 684

01/19/2012

685

01/20/2012

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (164 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 85 of 266

Page 84 of 96

(asl) (Entered: 01/20/2012) 01/23/2012 687 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Guy Alan Lewis appearing for Patrick Joseph as Co-Counsel (Lewis, Guy) Modified on 1/24/2012 (ls). (Entered: 01/23/2012) NOTICE of Expert Witnesses by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 01/25/2012) Fourth RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 01/27/2012) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff: Arraignment on Second Superseding Indictment as to Jean Rene Duperval (4) Count 8ss-9ss,10ss-28ss held on 1/27/2012. (Digital 10:13:42.) (gm1) (Entered: 01/30/2012) ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to counts Jean Rene Duperval (4) Count 8ss-9ss,10ss-28ss. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held on 1/27/2012 before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff. (gm1) (Entered: 01/30/2012) STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER as to Jean Rene Duperval. All motions concerning matters not covered by this order must be filed within 28 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff on 1/27/2012. (gm1) (Entered: 01/30/2012) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William C. Turnoff: Status Conference re Arraignment as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. held on 1/27/2012. Defense respectfully declined to enter a Not Guilty Plea on behalf of the corporation. Defendant believes second superseding indictment exceeds the statute of limitations. (Digital 10:13:42.) (gm1) (Entered: 01/30/2012) PAPERLESS NOTICE OF HEARING as to Patrick Joseph Arraignment on Second Superseding Indictment set for 2/2/2012 10:00 AM in Miami Division before MIA Duty Magistrate. (sl) (Entered: 01/30/2012) Fifth RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 01/31/2012) NOTICE OF PERMANENT ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Kathryn Ashley Meyers appearing for Patrick Joseph (gm1) (Entered: 02/02/2012) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Ted E. Bandstra: Arraignment as to Patrick Joseph (9) Count 8,8s held on 2/2/2012. (Digital 10:13:46.) (gm1) (Entered: 02/02/2012) NOTICE/ORDER OF CHANGE OF PLEA; as to Patrick Joseph Change of Plea Hearing set for 2/8/2012 02:00 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 02/02/2012) ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to counts Patrick Joseph (9) Count 8,8s. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held

01/25/2012 01/27/2012 01/27/2012

688 689 691

01/27/2012

692

01/27/2012

693

01/27/2012

694

01/30/2012

690

01/31/2012 02/02/2012 02/02/2012

695 696 697

02/02/2012

698

02/02/2012

699

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (165 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 86 of 266

Page 85 of 96

on 2/2/2012 before Magistrate Judge Ted E. Bandstra. (asl) (Entered: 02/02/2012) 02/02/2012 700 STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER as to Patrick Joseph. All motions concerning matters not covered by this order must be filed within 28 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ted E. Bandstra on 2/2/2012. (asl) (Entered: 02/02/2012) Sixth RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 02/03/2012) NOTICE of Filing Trial Transcript by Carlos Rodriguez (Attachments: # 1 Transcripts 7-26-11 a.m. session)(Valiente, Lauren) (Entered: 02/07/2012) NOTICE of Filing Trial Transcript by Carlos Rodriguez (Attachments: # 1 Transcripts 7-27-11 a.m. session)(Valiente, Lauren) (Entered: 02/07/2012) NOTICE of Filing Trial Exhibits by Carlos Rodriguez (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2-8, # 2 Exhibit 10-21, # 3 Exhibit 30 - Part 1, # 4 Exhibit 30 - Part 2, # 5 Exhibit 30 - Part 3, # 6 Exhibit 30 - Part 4, # 7 Exhibit 30 - Part 5, # 8 Exhibit 30 - Part 6, # 9 Exhibit 30 - Part 7, # 10 Exhibit 30 - Part 8, # 11 Exhibit 30 - Part 9, # 12 Exhibit 30 - Part 10, # 13 Exhibit 30 - Part 11, # 14 Exhibit 30 - Part 12, # 15 Exhibit 30 - Part 13, # 16 Exhibit 30 - Part 14, # 17 Exhibit 30 - Part 15, # 18 Exhibit 30 - Part 16, # 19 Exhibit 30 - Part 17, # 20 Exhibit 31 - Part 1, # 21 Exhibit 31 - Part 2, # 22 Exhibit 31 - Part 3, # 23 Exhibit 31 - Part 4, # 24 Exhibit 31 - Part 5, # 25 Exhibit 31 - Part 6, # 26 Exhibit 32 - Part 1, # 27 Exhibit 32 - Part 2, # 28 Exhibit 32 - Part 3, # 29 Exhibit 32 - Part 4, # 30 Exhibit 32 - Part 5, # 31 Exhibit 33-34, # 32 Exhibit 35 - Part 1, # 33 Exhibit 35 - Part 2, # 34 Exhibit 35 - Part 3, # 35 Exhibit 35 Part 4, # 36 Exhibit 35 - Part 5, # 37 Exhibit 35 - Part 6, # 38 Exhibit 35 - Part 7, # 39 Exhibit 35 - Part 8, # 40 Exhibit 35 - Part 9, # 41 Exhibit 35 - Part 10, # 42 Exhibit 35 - Part 11, # 43 Exhibit 35 - Part 12, # 44 Exhibit 35 - Part 13, # 45 Exhibit 35 - Part 14, # 46 Exhibit 35 - Part 15, # 47 Exhibit 35 - Part 16, # 48 Exhibit 35 - Part 17, # 49 Exhibit 35 - Part 18, # 50 Exhibit 35 - Part 19, # 51 Exhibit 36 - Part 1, # 52 Exhibit 36 - Part 2, # 53 Exhibit 37 - Part 1, # 54 Exhibit 37 - Part 2, # 55 Exhibit 37 - Part 3, # 56 Exhibit 38 - Part 1, # 57 Exhibit 38 - Part 2, # 58 Exhibit 38 - Part 3, # 59 Exhibit 38 - Part 4, # 60 Exhibit 38 - Part 5, # 61 Exhibit 38 - Part 6, # 62 Exhibit 38 - Part 7, # 63 Exhibit 40, # 64 Exhibit 41 - Part 1, # 65 Exhibit 41 - Part 2, # 66 Exhibit 41 Part 3, # 67 Exhibit 42 - Part 1, # 68 Exhibit 42 - Part 2, # 69 Exhibit 42 - Part 3, # 70 Exhibit 42 - Part 4, # 71 Exhibit 42 - Part 5, # 72 Exhibit 42 - Part 6, # 73 Exhibit 42 - Part 7, # 74 Exhibit 42 - Part 8, # 75 Exhibit 42 - Part 9, # 76 Exhibit 43, # 77 Exhibit 44-45, # 78 Exhibit 46, # 79 Exhibit 47, # 80 Exhibit 48, # 81 Exhibit 50-51, # 82 Exhibit 60-65, # 83 Exhibit 70-74, # 84 Exhibit 76, # 85 Exhibit 77, # 86 Exhibit 78 - Part 1, # 87 Exhibit 78 - Part 2, # 88 Exhibit 79, # 89 Exhibit 81, # 90 Exhibit 83 - Part 1, # 91 Exhibit 83 - Part 2, # 92 Exhibit 84, # 93 Exhibit 90-99, # 94 Exhibit 101-116, # 95 Exhibit 117, # 96 Exhibit 117 Partial, # 97 Exhibit 119, # 98 Exhibit 120-124, # 99 Exhibit 127-172, # 100 Exhibit 147, # 101 Exhibit 173-176 & 178-181, # 102 Exhibit 182-194, # 103 Exhibit 196-210, # 104 Exhibit 211, # 105 Exhibit 212-217, # 106 Exhibit 301-302, # 107 Exhibit 303, # 108 Exhibit 304-321t, # 109 Exhibit 322, # 110 Exhibit 401-408, # 111 Exhibit 451-458t, # 112 Exhibit

02/03/2012 02/07/2012 02/07/2012 02/07/2012

701 702 703 704

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (166 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 87 of 266

Page 86 of 96

500-510, # 113 Exhibit 600-603, # 114 Exhibit 700a-n, # 115 Exhibit 806, # 116 Exhibit 808-812, # 117 Exhibit J.E. Exhibit A, # 118 Exhibit J.E. Exhibit DD, # 119 Exhibit J.E. Exhibit G-L, # 120 Exhibit J.E. Exhibit Q)(Valiente, Lauren) (Entered: 02/07/2012) 02/08/2012 705 Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Change of Plea Hearing as to Patrick Joseph held on 2/8/2012 Patrick Joseph (9) Guilty Count 8s. French Interpreter present. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 02/08/2012) PLEA AGREEMENT: Exhibit, as to Patrick Joseph (wh) (Entered: 02/08/2012) NOTICE/ORDER OF SENTENCING; as to Patrick Joseph Sentencing set for 4/17/2012 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 02/08/2012) NOTICE of Reassignment of Assistant US Attorney. Karen E Moore appearing for USA. Daren Grove terminated (Moore, Karen) (Entered: 02/10/2012) Seventh RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 02/10/2012) Notice of Presentence Investigation Assignment of Patrick Joseph to US Probation Officer Wendy Squitero in the Miami Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse and she can be contacted at (305)523-5472 or Wendy_Squitero@flsp.uscourts.gov. (lrn) (Entered: 02/15/2012) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton: Status Conference Re: Arraignment as to Marguerite Grandison held on 2/16/2012. ( Arraignment RESET for 2/21/2012 10:00 AM before MIA Duty Magistrate ). Signed on 2/16/12 by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton (Digital 13:38:31 / 14:05:11.) (mdc) (Entered: 02/16/2012) MOTION to Sever Defendant Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc., or in the alternative, MOTION to Exclude extortion and/or economic duress defense to the charges filed in this cause ( Responses due by 3/5/2012) by Jean Rene Duperval. (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 02/16/2012) NOTICE of Expert Witness (Second) by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 02/17/2012) NOTICE RE-SETTING CALENDAR CALL: as to Jean Rene Duperval, Marguerite Grandison, Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. Calendar Call reset for 2/27/2012 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 02/17/2012) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 07-25-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-73 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction

02/08/2012 02/08/2012

706 707

02/10/2012

708

02/10/2012 02/15/2012

709 710

02/16/2012

711

02/16/2012

712

02/17/2012 02/17/2012

713 714

02/20/2012

715

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (167 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 88 of 266

Page 87 of 96

Request due 3/15/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/26/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/24/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 02/20/2012) 02/20/2012 716 TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 07-26-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-77 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 3/15/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/26/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/24/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 02/20/2012) RESPONSE to Motion by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. as to Jean Rene Duperval re 712 MOTION to Sever Defendant Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc., or in the alternative MOTION to Exclude extortion and/or economic duress defense to the charges filed in this cause and Joinder Replies due by 3/2/2012. (Hirschhorn, Joel) Modified Parties/Text on 2/22/2012 (ls). (Entered: 02/21/2012) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber: Arraignment on Second Superseding Indictment as to Marguerite Grandison (5) Count 8ss-9ss,10ss-28ss held on 2/21/2012. (Digital 10:10:35.) (gm1) (Entered: 02/21/2012) Eighth RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 02/21/2012) ARRAIGNMENT INFORMATION SHEET Not Guilty Plea entered as to counts Marguerite Grandison (5) Count 1,2-8,8s-9s,8ss-9ss,9,10-21,10s28s,10ss-28ss. Court accepts plea. Arraignment held on 2/21/2012 before Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber. (asl) (Entered: 02/22/2012) STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER as to Marguerite Grandison. All motions concerning matters not covered by this order must be filed within 28 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber on 2/21/2012. (asl) (Entered: 02/22/2012) Clerks Notice to Filer re 717 Response to Motion,,. Master Case Selected; ERROR - The filer selected the Master Case, instead of the applicable defendant. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) (Entered: 02/22/2012) Clerks Notice to Filer re 717 Response to Motion,. Document not filed in Text Searchable Format; ERROR - The document was not filed in Text Searchable Format. All future filings must be submitted in Text Searchable format as instructed in the CM/ECF Administrative Procedure 3G(5) -Page 10-. It is not necessary to refile this document (ls) (Entered: 02/22/2012) Proposed Jury Instructions by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval (Koukios, James) (Entered: 02/22/2012)

02/21/2012

717

02/21/2012

718

02/21/2012 02/21/2012

719 720

02/21/2012

721

02/22/2012

722

02/22/2012

723

02/22/2012

724

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 02/22/2012 725 Date (168 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 89 of 266

Page 88 of 96

Joint MOTION to Set Trial During the Second Week of the Calendar Period by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval. Responses due by 3/12/2012 (Koukios, James) (Entered: 02/22/2012) Proposed Voir Dire Questions by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval (Koukios, James) (Entered: 02/24/2012) ORDER OF DISMISSAL as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (8), Count (s) 1, 10-28, 10s-28s, 1s, 2-7, 2s-7s, 8, 8s, Dismissed as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/24/2012. (asl) (Entered: 02/24/2012) Minute Order: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: denying 725 Motion as to Jean Rene Duperval (4); Calendar Call as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 2/27/2012. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-5235598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 02/27/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 729 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 02/28/2012)

02/24/2012 02/24/2012

726 727

02/27/2012

728

02/28/2012 02/28/2012 730

Supplemental RESPONSE to Standing Discovery Order by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Koukios, James) (Entered: 02/28/2012) APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment by USA as to Joel Esquenazi. (asl) (Entered: 02/29/2012) WRIT of Garnishment Issued; re 731 Motion for Writ as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 2/28/2012. (asl) (Entered: 02/29/2012) APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment by USA as to Joel Esquenazi. (asl) (Entered: 02/29/2012) WRIT of Garnishment Issued; re 733 Motion for Writ as to Joel Esquenazi (1). Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 2/28/2012. (asl) (Entered: 02/29/2012) Witness List by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval (Koukios, James) (Entered: 03/01/2012) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Day 1 begun on 3/1/2012 Jean Rene Duperval (4) on Count 8ss-9ss,10ss28ss. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 03/01/2012) MOTION in Limine to Admit Government's Exhibits by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval. Responses due by 3/22/2012 (Kahn, Daniel) (Entered: 03/04/2012) MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval. Responses due by 3/22/2012 (Koukios, James) (Entered: 03/04/2012) TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez, Jean Rene Duperval held on 04/26/2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, 1-29 pages, Court Reporter: Judy Wolff, 305-523-5294 / Judy_Wolff@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the

02/28/2012 02/28/2012 02/28/2012 02/28/2012 03/01/2012 03/01/2012

731 732 733 734 735 736

03/04/2012 03/04/2012 03/04/2012

737 738 739

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (169 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 90 of 266

Page 89 of 96

deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 3/29/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/9/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/7/2012. (jsn) (Entered: 03/04/2012) 03/05/2012 03/05/2012 740 741 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Courtney Montiero appearing for Jean Rene Duperval (Montiero, Courtney) (Entered: 03/05/2012) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 3/5/2012. Day 2. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 03/05/2012) Defendant's MOTION for Hearing re 727 Order Dismissing Count (s)/Indictment by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc.. Responses due by 3/22/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Hirschhorn, Joel) Modified to add Motion for Clarification, see 745 on 3/6/2012 (asl). (Entered: 03/05/2012) RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 742 Defendant's MOTION for Hearing or Clarification re 727 Order Dismissing Count(s)/Indictment Replies due by 3/15/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Koukios, James) (Entered: 03/05/2012) Clerks Notice to Filer re 742 Defendant's MOTION for Hearing or Clarification re 727 Order Dismissing Count(s)/Indictment. Motion with Multiple Reliefs Filed as One Relief; ERROR - The Filer selected only one relief event and failed to select the additional corresponding events for each relief requested in the motion. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (asl) (Entered: 03/06/2012) MOTION for Clarification 727 Order Dismissing Count(s)/Indictment by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc.. Responses due by 3/22/2012. See 742 for image (asl) (Entered: 03/06/2012) REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 742 Defendant's MOTION for Hearing or Clarification re 727 Order Dismissing Count(s)/Indictment, 745 MOTION for Clarification 727 Order Dismissing Count(s)/Indictment (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 03/06/2012) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 3/6/2012. Day 3. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 03/06/2012) Minute Order: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: granting 737 Motion to Admit Government's Exhibits as to Jean Rene Duperval (4); Jury Trial as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 3/7/2012. Day 4. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 03/07/2012) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial

03/05/2012

742

03/05/2012

743

03/05/2012

744

03/05/2012

745

03/06/2012

746

03/06/2012

747

03/07/2012

748

03/08/2012

749

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (170 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 91 of 266

Page 90 of 96

as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 3/8/2012. Day 5. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 03/08/2012) 03/09/2012 750 Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 3/9/2012. Day 6. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 03/09/2012) Proposed Jury Instructions by Jean Rene Duperval (Montiero, Courtney) (Entered: 03/09/2012) Minute Entry: for proceedings held before Judge Jose E. Martinez: Jury Trial Completed as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 3/12/2012. Day 7. Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov (wh) (Entered: 03/13/2012) EXHIBIT LIST by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval (wh) (Entered: 03/13/2012) EXHIBIT and WITNESS LIST by Jean Rene Duperval (wh) (Entered: 03/13/2012) Court's Final Instructions to the Jury; as to Jean Rene Duperval (wh) (Entered: 03/13/2012) Jury Notes as to Jean Rene Duperval (wh) (Entered: 03/13/2012) JURY VERDICT as to Jean Rene Duperval (4) Guilty on Count 8ss-9ss,10ss28ss (wh) (Entered: 03/13/2012) NOTICE/ORDER OF SENTENCING; as to Jean Rene Duperval Sentencing set for 5/21/2012 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 03/13/2012) NOTICE OF FILING COURT EXHIBIT; as to Jean Rene Duperval (wh) (Entered: 03/13/2012) Stipulation Permitting Withdrawal of Exhibits; as to Jean Rene Duperval. (wh) (Entered: 03/14/2012) ANSWER to Writ of Garnishment by AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company as to Joel Esquenazi to 734 Order on Motion for Writ (asl) (Entered: 03/14/2012) Notice of Presentence Investigation Assignment of Jean Rene Duperval to US Probation Officer Wendy Squitero in the Miami Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse and she can be contacted at (305)523-5472 or Wendy_Squitero@flsp.uscourts.gov. (lrn) (Entered: 03/14/2012) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Carlos Rodriguez held on 7-18-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-215 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of

03/09/2012 03/12/2012

751 752

03/13/2012 03/13/2012 03/13/2012 03/13/2012 03/13/2012 03/13/2012

753 754 755 756 757 758

03/13/2012 03/14/2012 03/14/2012

759 760 761

03/14/2012

762

03/15/2012

763

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (171 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 92 of 266

Page 91 of 96

Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 03/15/2012) 03/15/2012 764 TRANSCRIPT of hearing as to Carlos Rodriguez held on 7-14-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-36 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 03/15/2012) TRANSCRIPT of hearing as to Carlos Rodriguez held on 11-29-2010 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-10 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) Modified hearing date per Court Reporter on 3/15/2012 (wc). (Entered: 03/15/2012) TRANSCRIPT of hearing as to Carlos Rodriguez held on 11-19-2010 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-25 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) Modified hearing date per Court Reporter on 3/15/2012 (wc). (Entered: 03/15/2012) TRANSCRIPT of hearing as to Carlos Rodriguez held on 11-18-2010 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-11 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 03/15/2012) TRANSCRIPT of hearing as to Carlos Rodriguez held on 04-08-2010 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-10 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of

03/15/2012

765

03/15/2012

766

03/15/2012

767

03/15/2012

768

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (172 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 93 of 266

Page 92 of 96

Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 03/15/2012) 03/15/2012 769 TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 03-05-2012 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 6, 1-179 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 03/15/2012) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 03-06-2012 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 2 of 6, 180-366 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 03/15/2012) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 03-07-2012 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 3 of 6, 367-558 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 03/15/2012) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 03-08-2012 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 4 of 6, 559-745 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 03/15/2012) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 03-09-2012 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 5 of 6, 746-887 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted

03/15/2012

770

03/15/2012

771

03/15/2012

772

03/15/2012

773

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (173 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 94 of 266

Page 93 of 96

Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 03/15/2012) 03/15/2012 774 TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 03-12-2012 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 6 of 6, 888 - 1035 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/19/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/18/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 03/15/2012) ORDER denying 742 Motion for Hearing as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. (8). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/15/2012. (wh) (Entered: 03/15/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 776 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 03/16/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 777 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 03/16/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 778 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 03/16/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 779 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 03/16/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 780 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 03/21/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 781 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 03/22/2012) 782 783 NOTICE of Appeal by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 775 Order on Motion for Hearing (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 03/26/2012) Clerks Notice to Filer re 782 Notice (Other). Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#784]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (hh) (Entered: 03/27/2012) NOTICE OF APPEAL by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 775 Order on Motion for Hearing Filing fee $ 455.00.. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under Transcript Information. (see image de# 782) (hh) (Entered: 03/27/2012) Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. to US Court of Appeals re 784 Notice of Appeal Other Order, Filing Fee: (FEE NOT PAID) (hh) (Entered: 03/27/2012)

03/15/2012

775

03/16/2012 03/16/2012 03/16/2012 03/16/2012 03/21/2012 03/22/2012 03/26/2012 03/26/2012

03/26/2012

784

03/27/2012

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 03/27/2012 785 Date (174 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 95 of 266

Page 94 of 96

USCA Appeal Fees received $ 455.00, receipt number 35959 as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 784 Notice of Appeal - Other Order, : (hh) (Entered: 03/27/2012) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 720-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-53 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/23/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/3/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/2/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 03/29/2012) MOTION for Bond Pending Sentencing by Jean Rene Duperval. Responses due by 4/20/2012 (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 04/03/2012) Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 784 Notice of Appeal - Other Order, date received by USCA: 3/30/2012. USCA Case Number: 12-11684-C. (amb) (Entered: 04/04/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 789 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 04/05/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 790 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 04/05/2012)

03/29/2012

786

04/03/2012 04/04/2012

787 788

04/05/2012 04/05/2012 04/05/2012 791

TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM as to Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc. re 784 Notice of Appeal - Other Order, filed by Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc.. No Transcript Requested. (Hirschhorn, Joel) (Entered: 04/05/2012) Clerks Notice to Filer re 791 Transcript Information Form. Document not filed in Text Searchable Format; ERROR - The document was not filed in Text Searchable Format. All future filings must be submitted in Text Searchable format as instructed in the CM/ECF Administrative Procedure 3G (5) -Page 10-. It is not necessary to refile this document (asl) (Entered: 04/06/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 793 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 04/06/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 794 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 04/06/2012)

04/06/2012

792

04/06/2012 04/06/2012 04/10/2012 795

RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval re 787 MOTION for Bond Pending Sentencing (Koukios, James) (Entered: 04/10/2012) ORDER REFERRING MOTION as to Jean Rene Duperval 787 MOTION for Bond Pending Sentencing filed by Jean Rene Duperval Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/10/2012. (wh) (Entered: 04/10/2012)

04/10/2012

796

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 04/10/2012 04/12/2012 797 798 Date (175 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 96 of 266

Page 95 of 96

MOTION to Reduce Sentence Under Rule 35 by USA as to Robert Antoine. Responses due by 4/27/2012 (Fagan, Aurora) (Entered: 04/10/2012) ENDORSED ORDER Setting Hearing on 787 MOTION for Bond Pending Sentencing : as to Jean Rene Duperval for Wednesday, April 25, 2012 at 3:00 PM, before Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton, in the 8th Floor Courtroom at 301 N. Miami Avenue, Miami, FL 33128. The presence of Defendant Duperval is required. The parties shall be prepared to advise the Court of their estimate of the Sentencing Guideline range. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton on 4/12/2012. (aw) (Entered: 04/12/2012) ORDER Requiring Response(s) from Defendant's Counsel as to Robert Antoine re 797 MOTION to Reduce Sentence Under Rule 35 filed by USA Responses due on or before 4/27/2012. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/13/2012. (wh) (Entered: 04/13/2012) TRANSCRIPT of jury trial as to Joel Esquenazi, Carlos Rodriguez held on 719-2011 before Judge Jose E. Martinez, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1-116 pages, Court Reporter: Dawn Whitmarsh, 305-523-5598 / Dawn_Whitmarsh@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 5/7/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/17/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/16/2012. (dwh) (Entered: 04/13/2012) SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 801 restricted/sealed until further notice. (nc) (Entered: 04/16/2012) Set/Reset Deadlines as perp DE 799 re Motion or Report and Recommendation in case as to Robert Antoine 797 MOTION to Reduce Sentence Under Rule 35. Responses due by 4/27/2012 (lk) (Entered: 04/16/2012)

04/13/2012

799

04/13/2012

800

04/16/2012 04/16/2012

04/24/2012 04/25/2012

802 803

Unopposed MOTION for Disbursement of Bond by Marguerite Grandison. Responses due by 5/11/2012 (Vereen, Roderick) (Entered: 04/24/2012) TEXT Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton: Motion Hearing as to Jean Rene Duperval held on 4/25/2012 re 787 MOTION for Bond Pending Sentencing filed by Jean Rene Duperval. AUSA James Koukios appeared on behalf of the Government. Attorneys John Bergendahl and Courtney Montiero appeared on behalf of the Defendant. Oral arguments heard. Defendant's motion for bond pending sentencing is denied. (Digital 15:04:36 - 16:32:14.) (aw) (Entered: 04/26/2012) RESPONSE to Motion by Robert Antoine re 797 MOTION to Reduce Sentence Under Rule 35 Replies due by 5/7/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G)(Kainen, Dennis) (Entered: 04/26/2012) ORDER Granting Unopposed Motion for Discharge of Bond and Disbursement of Funds; re 802 Motion for Disbursement of Bond in the

04/26/2012

804

04/30/2012

805

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Case: 11-15331 Date (176 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 97 of 266

Page 96 of 96

amount of $50,000 Corporate Surety Bond posted on behalf of the defendant under Power No. IF50K-1394 as to Marguerite Grandison (5). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/30/2012. (asl) (Entered: 04/30/2012) 04/30/2012 05/02/2012 806 807 OBJECTIONS TO PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT by Jean Rene Duperval (Bergendahl, John) (Entered: 04/30/2012) ORDER as to Jean Rene Duperval, denying 787 MOTION for Bond Pending Sentencing. Follows oral order of 4/25/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton on 5/2/2012. (AMS) (Entered: 05/02/2012) Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Prosequendum Issued; as to Robert Antoine for 5/29/2012. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 5/4/2012. (wh) (Entered: 05/04/2012) NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION in case as to Robert Antoine 797 MOTION to Reduce Sentence Under Rule 35 : Motion Hearing set for 5/29/2012 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez. (wh) (Entered: 05/04/2012) RESPONSE to 806 Objections to Presentence Investigation Report by USA as to Jean Rene Duperval (Kahn, Daniel) (Entered: 05/08/2012)

05/04/2012

808

05/04/2012

809

05/08/2012

810

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt
05/08/2012 17:51:07 PACER Login: pc0304 Description: Billable Pages: 30 Client Code: Cost: 3.00 Docket Report Search Criteria: 1:09-cr-21010-JEM

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?285674707935083-L_1_0-1

5/8/2012

Case: 11-15331

Date (177 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012

Page: 98 of 266

DKT. 3

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 1 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date (178 of 345) Filed: 05/09/2012 Page: 99 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 2 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (179 05/09/2012 Page: 100 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 3 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (180 05/09/2012 Page: 101 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 4 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (181 05/09/2012 Page: 102 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 5 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (182 05/09/2012 Page: 103 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 6 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (183 05/09/2012 Page: 104 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 7 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (184 05/09/2012 Page: 105 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 8 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (185 05/09/2012 Page: 106 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 9 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (186 05/09/2012 Page: 107 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 10 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (187 05/09/2012 Page: 108 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 11 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (188 05/09/2012 Page: 109 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 12 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (189 05/09/2012 Page: 110 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 13 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (190 05/09/2012 Page: 111 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 14 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (191 05/09/2012 Page: 112 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 15 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (192 05/09/2012 Page: 113 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 16 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (193 05/09/2012 Page: 114 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 17 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (194 05/09/2012 Page: 115 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 18 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (195 05/09/2012 Page: 116 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 19 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (196 05/09/2012 Page: 117 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 20 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (197 05/09/2012 Page: 118 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 21 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (198 05/09/2012 Page: 119 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 22 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (199 05/09/2012 Page: 120 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 23 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (200 05/09/2012 Page: 121 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 24 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (201 05/09/2012 Page: 122 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 25 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (202 05/09/2012 Page: 123 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 26 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (203 05/09/2012 Page: 124 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 27 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (204 05/09/2012 Page: 125 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 28 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (205 05/09/2012 Page: 126 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 29 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (206 05/09/2012 Page: 127 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 30 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (207 05/09/2012 Page: 128 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 31 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (208 05/09/2012 Page: 129 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 32 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (209 05/09/2012 Page: 130 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 33 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (210 05/09/2012 Page: 131 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 34 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (211 05/09/2012 Page: 132 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2009 Page 35 of 35 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (212 05/09/2012 Page: 133 of 266

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (213 05/09/2012

Page: 134 of 266

DKT. 189

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2010 Page 1 of 6 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (214 05/09/2012 Page: 135 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2010 Page 2 of 6 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (215 05/09/2012 Page: 136 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2010 Page 3 of 6 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (216 05/09/2012 Page: 137 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2010 Page 4 of 6 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (217 05/09/2012 Page: 138 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2010 Page 5 of 6 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (218 05/09/2012 Page: 139 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2010 Page 6 of 6 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (219 05/09/2012 Page: 140 of 266

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (220 05/09/2012

Page: 141 of 266

DKT. 308

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 308 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2010 Page 1 of 5 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (221 05/09/2012 Page: 142 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 308 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2010 Page 2 of 5 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (222 05/09/2012 Page: 143 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 308 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2010 Page 3 of 5 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (223 05/09/2012 Page: 144 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 308 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2010 Page 4 of 5 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (224 05/09/2012 Page: 145 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 308 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2010 Page 5 of 5 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (225 05/09/2012 Page: 146 of 266

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (226 05/09/2012

Page: 147 of 266

DKT. 309

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 309 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2010 Page 1 of 3 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (227 05/09/2012 Page: 148 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 309 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2010 Page 2 of 3 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (228 05/09/2012 Page: 149 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 309 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2010 Page 3 of 3 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (229 05/09/2012 Page: 150 of 266

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (230 05/09/2012

Page: 151 of 266

DKT. 520

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 1 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (231 05/09/2012 Page: 152 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 2 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (232 05/09/2012 Page: 153 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 3 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (233 05/09/2012 Page: 154 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 4 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (234 05/09/2012 Page: 155 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 5 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (235 05/09/2012 Page: 156 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 6 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (236 05/09/2012 Page: 157 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 7 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (237 05/09/2012 Page: 158 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 8 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (238 05/09/2012 Page: 159 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 9 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (239 05/09/2012 Page: 160 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 10 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (240 05/09/2012 Page: 161 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 11 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (241 05/09/2012 Page: 162 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 12 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (242 05/09/2012 Page: 163 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 13 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (243 05/09/2012 Page: 164 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 14 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (244 05/09/2012 Page: 165 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 15 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (245 05/09/2012 Page: 166 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 16 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (246 05/09/2012 Page: 167 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 17 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (247 05/09/2012 Page: 168 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 18 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (248 05/09/2012 Page: 169 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 19 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (249 05/09/2012 Page: 170 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 20 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (250 05/09/2012 Page: 171 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 21 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (251 05/09/2012 Page: 172 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 22 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (252 05/09/2012 Page: 173 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 23 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (253 05/09/2012 Page: 174 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 24 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (254 05/09/2012 Page: 175 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 25 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (255 05/09/2012 Page: 176 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 26 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (256 05/09/2012 Page: 177 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 27 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (257 05/09/2012 Page: 178 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 28 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (258 05/09/2012 Page: 179 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 29 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (259 05/09/2012 Page: 180 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 30 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (260 05/09/2012 Page: 181 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 31 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (261 05/09/2012 Page: 182 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 32 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (262 05/09/2012 Page: 183 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 33 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (263 05/09/2012 Page: 184 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 34 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (264 05/09/2012 Page: 185 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 35 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (265 05/09/2012 Page: 186 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 36 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (266 05/09/2012 Page: 187 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 37 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (267 05/09/2012 Page: 188 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 38 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (268 05/09/2012 Page: 189 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 39 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (269 05/09/2012 Page: 190 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 40 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (270 05/09/2012 Page: 191 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 41 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (271 05/09/2012 Page: 192 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 42 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (272 05/09/2012 Page: 193 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 43 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (273 05/09/2012 Page: 194 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 44 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (274 05/09/2012 Page: 195 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 45 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (275 05/09/2012 Page: 196 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 46 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (276 05/09/2012 Page: 197 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 47 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (277 05/09/2012 Page: 198 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 48 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (278 05/09/2012 Page: 199 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 49 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (279 05/09/2012 Page: 200 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 50 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (280 05/09/2012 Page: 201 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 51 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (281 05/09/2012 Page: 202 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 52 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (282 05/09/2012 Page: 203 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 53 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (283 05/09/2012 Page: 204 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 54 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (284 05/09/2012 Page: 205 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 55 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (285 05/09/2012 Page: 206 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 56 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (286 05/09/2012 Page: 207 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 57 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (287 05/09/2012 Page: 208 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 58 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (288 05/09/2012 Page: 209 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 59 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (289 05/09/2012 Page: 210 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 60 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (290 05/09/2012 Page: 211 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 61 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (291 05/09/2012 Page: 212 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 62 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (292 05/09/2012 Page: 213 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 63 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (293 05/09/2012 Page: 214 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 64 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (294 05/09/2012 Page: 215 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 65 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (295 05/09/2012 Page: 216 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 66 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (296 05/09/2012 Page: 217 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 67 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (297 05/09/2012 Page: 218 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 68 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (298 05/09/2012 Page: 219 of 266

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 520 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2011 Page 69 of 69 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (299 05/09/2012 Page: 220 of 266

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (300 05/09/2012

Page: 221 of 266

DKT. 609

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (301 05/09/2012 Page: 222 of 266

UNI TED STATES DI STRI COURT FOR THE CT SOUTHERN DI STRI OF FLORI CT DA M im iDi so a vii n

Cas Num be O9- 9I CR- ARTI e r: ZI M- M NEZ

UNI TED STATES OF AM ERI CA,
Pl i if antf,
VS.

, t l, J ESQUENM I e a. OEL
De e nt. f nda s / ORDER DENYI DEFENDANTS'M OTI N FOR JUDGM ENT OF ACOUI NG O TTAL OR NEW TRI AL THI CAUSE c me be or t Cour upon De e ntCa l Rod i z' M oto f S a f e he t f nda ros rgue s i ns or

J d me t f q itl r w Tra ( E. s 5 2 5 3 .Dee d n J e Es ue a iie M oins u g n o Ac u t o Ne il D. No . 4 , 4 ) fn a t o l q n z fld to a t Ad p Cal Ro rq zs Moi n frJ g n o Ac uta o Ne Tra ( E. . 46 5 7 1 o o t ros d iue ' to s o ud me t f q i l r w ilD. Nos 5 , 4 ) t
a aM otont AdoptRod i z' Re yt Go r ntsRes et Doc tEntyNumbe 543 nd i o rgue s pl o ve nme ' pons o ke r r

( E. . 8 ) whiht i Co r g a t.Afe c rf lc n ie ai na d f rtera o ss tf rh D. No 5 6 , c h s u t rn s tr aeu o sd r to n o h e s n e o t

beow,t Cour de e Def nda s m oto . l he t ni s e nt ' i ns
1. Background

c mb r , 0 9 e ea rn u y e= d - omt n it n g is o l On De e e 4 2 0 ,a fd r lg a dj r r t e azlc t i dcme ta an tJ e

Es u n z, ro Ro rg e , b rAnone J a neDu e v l n M ag rt Gr n io ( E. q e a iCa ls d iu z Ro e t ti , e nRe p r a a d rueie a d s n D.
No. .Co 1c r dEs naz,Rodrgue a ot r wihcons rngt vi aet For gn 3) unt ha ge que i i z, nd hes t pii o olt he ei

t elt s o he ton or w l que im ove t a Es naz d o doptdocke en r numbe 542 asi r a e t t M o i f Ne t ty r Tra onl e ptng t a gum e r r ng s ve a ,a doc te r numbe 543 i is il y, xce i he r nt ega di e r nce nd ke nty r nt

e iey.Se ( E. .546,547) Thi Cour wiladdes onl t eagume stmeyma i ntrt e D. Nos . s t l r s y hos r nt i l de n Rod iue ' M oto .SeeUniedst e v Br et 11 F.d 1 1 06( t Ci.1 . rg zs ins t ats . amlt, 6 3 403, 405- 11h r 997)

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 2 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (302 05/09/2012 Page: 223 of 266

Co p P a tc sAc (FCPA' a dt c mmiwiefa d,nvo ainof1 U.. j3 .Co n s mz t r cie t ' ' ' n o o t r ru i ilto ) 8 SC. 71 u t
2- c r d Es naz , drgue a o her wih s t ntveFCPA ofens ,i vi a i of1 8 ha ge que i Ro i z, nd t s t ubsa i f es n olton 5

U. C.j78 d 2 a d 1 U. C.j 2 Co n 9 c ag d Es u n z,Ro rg e ,a d oheswih S. d - n 8 S. . u t h r e q e a i d iu z n t r t c n prngt c mmimo ylu d rn ,nvilto o 1 U.. j1 5 h .Co n s1 - c r e o s ii o o t ne a n e ig i oain f 8 SC. 9 6() u t 0 21 hag d
Es naz,Rodrgue a ot r wih s t ntvem one lunde i ofe es i vi a i of1 que i i z, nd he s t ubsa i y a rng f ns , n olton 8

U. C. j1 5 ()1 ( ()a d 1 U. C. 2. S. j 9 6 a( )B)i n 8 S. j An on pla e g l ( E. . 3 )a dtetil f q e a i n Ro rg e wa s vee t ie e d d uiy D. No 1 2 , n h ra o Es u n z a d d iu z s e rd t fo ta o Du r a a dGrn io ( E. . 9 ) r m h t f pev l n a ds n. D. No 3 4 .

OnJ l 1 2 1 af d rlga dj r rtr e a2 -o n s p re i g idcme ta an t uy 2, 01 , e ea r n u y eu n d 8c u t u e sd n n it n g is

W as ngt V a co Cr z, hi on s nez u Amade Rihe s Ci r Tee m muniato , nc.Parc J e us c r, ne gy lco c i ns I , ti k os ph,

J a Re eDu e v la d Ma g rt Grnds n.( E. 41 ) e n n p r a, n r ueie a io D. No. 9 . Dee d n s q e a i n Ro rg zweec n ce b ur o g s 4 2 1o lc t s fn a t Es u n z a d diue r o vitd yj y nAu u t , 01 nal omt
nd o omm i wie fa a f t r r ud nd or oft i cm e ,i udi c pii t vi ae t FCPA a t c he ndi t nt ncl ng ons rng o olt he

vilto o mo e lu d rngsau e .( E. s 5 2 5 3 . oain f n y a n ei ttts D. No . 2 , 2 )

A. Evi nc A tTri R e di A gre m e s de e al gar ng e nt .

Asa cu ae y saed byt Gove nme i isCo o i t Re po ei Opposto t c r tl t t he r nt n t ns lda ed s ns n ii n o

Dee d n 'M oinf rJ d me t Ac uta o Ne Tra ( E. . 61 : fn a t to o u g n of q itl r w il D. No 5 )2 s

TheGove nm e i toduc vol i r nt n r ed um nousdoc nt r e de e ume a y vi nc s howi t tt de e n se e e i o a sm ia a e m e wih ng ha he f nda t nt r d nt i lr gr e nt t Je n Re Duper l one ofAnt ness c s sa a ne va, oi ' uc es or s

E lc mmu iai n D' ii (Tee o')Die tro Tee o n c to s Hat' ' lc ' rco f s' ) I enai lReai . pe v la e t rduceE er ntr tona ltons Du r a gred o e ' ra r Tee ommuni to s(' r '1rtsatrTer a r e t ma lc cain' ' a' ae fe ra g e d o ke Ter )
n nts iai nd ou 2 Cour waspr s nta t ti land c c dt Gover m e ' ct tonsa f nd The t e e t he ra he ke he t m t beac ur t he o c a e.
-

2-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 3 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (303 05/09/2012 Page: 224 of 266

compa whl wasi or aedby Te r si hous a t ne ny ch nc por t ra' n- e tor y, J m e Dike on be fofDupe va ' sser M a gue ie n s c y, hal r ls it , r rt Gr ndion,a whos ba a c mtwa s tu by Te r spe s a s nd e nk c ot se p ra' r onal banke .Se ,e. ,Gov. .2-21 1 1 1 202,601. r e g. Exs , 27- 37, 98Rodrg z s tu r c ng wiepa m e st TCS a a horze i ue e p e uni r y nt o nd ut i d

'o uln ' y nst Tee o Co utn S rie (' ', ' ns t g' me t o lc m nslig evcs ' ' a c i ya TCS )

temao i o t ' o s li 'p y ns whih Grn io h j rt f he ' n utng' a me t, c a d s n y c

diti e t Dupe va . e eg. Gov.Exs 2- ,1 ,603. srbut d o r l Se , . , . 21 28

(l eGo e n n 'wi e s sc nfnn dt d tiso t e eilg l th v r me t t se o i e he eal f h s le a s n

a e m e s Coope ai co- ons r t sRo r Ant ne J a gr e nt . r tng c pia or be t oi , e n Four nd,a J n Di t tfe t tEs naz ag ee wih ca nd ua az esii d ha que i r d t Ant ne o t ki kba k s he edes rbe a vea t t oi n he c c c m c i d bo nd ha Four a a Diz, ong wih ot rAn oi a s it ,a ee t c nd nd a al t he t ne s oca es gr d o lunde t ki kba k pa a r he c c yment b r c vi c c a calng s y e ei ng he ks nd li ca dsf o Te r onAnt ne' be f Se ,eg. Tr 7 26 2011AM r r m ra oi s hal. e . , . / /

p 3 35( ti e p annghi ds u so swihEs u na i p. 4- Anone x lii s ic si n t q e z r g r igtekc b c s h me; . / 9201 AM p . 9 7 e a dn h ik a k c e ) Tr 7 1 / 1 p 6 -0 ( a e pli n ta h a re t lu d rt kc ba kpa me t Diz x anig h t e g e d o a n e he ik c y n s fo Ter t An on ) An on e pli dta, e Es ue a i r m ra o t ie . t ie x ane h t p r q n z' s
i tu tons hem e wihAnt o ' nsr c i , t t oni ' Tony'Pe e Te r scontole , ' r z, ra' r lr ove l h t wor outt de al ofhow t kikba kswo d be r unc o k he t is he c c ul pad. .7 26/ 1AM p.36. trTe r fr d Pe e i J nua y i Tr / 201 Afe ra ie r z n a r 2002,Ant ne dic s dt kikba k a r ng m e swih oi s us e he c c ra e nt t Es na i Tr 7/ 2011PM p.89. que z . . 26/ r z orobor t d oi s e tmon nd onfr d ha Tony Pe e c r a e Ant ne' t si y a c im e t t Rodrgue a Dike as a e d t pa kikba kst Ant nei i z nd c y lo gr e o y c c o oi n e hangef r duc i i t a ot sTe r owed Hat Telco xc or e tons n he m mt ra ii e a f notdi c nd or s onne tng Terass r c de pienon- yme . ci r ' e vie s t pa nt Pe e expli d t t ar und Oc obe 2001 Es rz a ne ha, o t r , quena ii tu t d z nsr c e hi t a k Ant net a e t a ori Terasde t Hat m o s oi o gr e o m tze r ' bt o ii Te e o and,i t tdi no wo k,'o oferAnt ne asdepa e . lc f ha d t r ' f t oi i ym nt' ' Tr 7/ 2011AM pp. 76. i al h meei Ant ne . 22/ 74- Durng unc tng, oi

rj ce P r z sa riai rq e t u a re t a c p 'i e ee td ee ' mo t t e u s b t g e d o c e t' d z on s

pa m e s'a y nt 'lunde e t o h t r pa t i em e a i . #.Pe e r d hr ug hid- ry nt r dires f rz t sii d t ther poredba k on t sl h m e tng t Es na , e tfe ha e t c hi unc e i o que zi Rod i z,a Dike rgue nd c y:

l fe ta me tn , me n, o k o I etg o . All r h t ei g I a y u n w, f l o d
lf tlkeImadeahug co rb i t t el i e nti uton o he c ompa s 1wen ba k t my ofi a Iha ny, o t c o fce nd d
-

3-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 4 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (304 05/09/2012 Page: 225 of 266

s ome suf t do. Andyou kno l trt t t fo w, ae ha afe oon,1e d bac i J ' ofk e a J mes tm nde k n oels t nd a Dike a Ca l Rodrgue wer t ea you c y nd ros i z e her nd, know, sc l t ne oft tde wa s r d ba ialy he ws ha al s ha e wih t m , t he

Tr 7/ 2011AM pp. 81. r z e ane t thedic s d . 22/ 79- Pe e xpl i d ha s us e wih Es naz , t que i Rodrgue a Di ke 'he f c t tRobe t i z, nd c y ' a t ha t r M t nehad a ce e a a r nge e t a e , know, oi c ptd n ra m nt o cc pt you pa m e st hi i e hangef r duc ng otrbil'and t r y nt o m n xc or e i t ls' hei

ra to st h srp r:' e1 ( q e a i wa h p y a db t e ci n o i e o t ' 1, Es u n z) s a p , n oh W n o J me Dik ya dCa lsRo rg zas c n rt ae meo aj b n s c e n ro d iue lo o g aultd
we ldone. Tr 7 22 2011AM pp.79- 1 Pe eza s expl i t l ' ./ / ' 8 . r lo aned he a c he r c ve fom Di y when helt re e s hi dvie e ei d ' r cke ae xpr s ed s c nc r t tt yhad e e e i o a ilgala r nge nt o e n ha he nt r d nt n le ra me : J m e Dike s i l k Tony,yo ha not ng t n s c y ad, oo u ve hi o

wo r gb uq y ur n ta o fc ro tec mp n , ry a o t, o ' o n fie f h o a y e

you'enota owneroft compa you don'have r n he ny, t sgna or a t iyt sgn c cks t sg wie ,t i t y u hort o i he , o i n r s o sgn a hi you cn i nyt ng, nnotbi t c nd he ompa ny co r c ua l wihyoursgna ur ,you ha not ng nta t ly t i t e ve hi

t wo r a o t Thi i J e'a dCals') o ry b u . s s o l n ro l s s

pr em . si t i de ii n, hi i notyour obl Thi s her c so t s s de son,don'wory a cii t r bouti. t

Tr 7222 1AM p 7 -8 . . / / 01 p. 9 (21

Thet tmony ofTe r a c a J eArolga esi ra c ount nt os r i c r a e t t tmony oft coope a i c co pia o s For orobor t d he esi he r tng o- ns r t r . e mpl J n Di zt sii d t tt ' ns tng Agr e e 'he xa e, ua a e tfe ha he ' uli Co e m nt'

e tr dit wi Te r ( 3 )wa as n c n rc c e tds ne e n o t ra Ex. 01 s h m o ta t rae o h

t tTe r woul ' ves ha r a d' ha ome do lm e a i ast why mone was c l nt ton o y

b igp i t ( sc mp l jJ Lo ao . Tr 7 1 / 01 AM p en ad o hi o am D c t r' . / 92 1 ' p. (3 8 ) Dizn v rs b te iv ie t j tf t ep y n st 8 - 5 . a e e u mitd n o c s o usiy h a me t o

hi , n t h t c r c ,whi h wa sgne by Rodrgue m eve houg he onta t c si d i z,

rq ie hm t d s . . / 9 2 11AM pp. 0 81 Ex 3 !7 e ur d i o o o Tr 7 1 / 0 8 - ; . 01 .
Arolga, r i who wa r s nsbl f Ac ount Pa bl a Tera s e po i e or c s ya e t r , c onsr e t Te r ne rr eve a ba k- doc m d hat ra ve ec i d ny c up umentton ai f rt pa e st J Loc t ora oft o he t r pa t o he ym nt o D a or ny he t r hid r y ' ns tnt . Tr 7 20/ 1 PM pp. 57,60,70, 77,79,82. ' ula s' . / 201 co ' 5676Arolgae a ne t tt m n ri whih pa e st J r i xpli d ha he nne n c ym nt o D Loc t wer i ta e by ' he k r que t' ndwihoutba kup aor e niit d' c e s 'a c t c
-

4-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 5 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (305 05/09/2012 Page: 226 of 266

doc e t ton- wa ' nus 'a not' r a . Tr 7/ / 1 um n a i s ' ual' nd u ' m l' . 21 201 no ' PM pp.1 15- 7. or ove ,Arolgat tfe Rodrguez 3, 1 M e r r i esi d, i

a to ie t emao iyof h p y nst J Lo ao , uh rz d h j rt t e a me t o D c t r A&G

Diti or , Te e om Cons tng,hr eoft c srbut s and l c uli t e he ompa e ni s Te r us t l unde f ra ed o a r undst Telco ofki l.I o e f as d

( E. 5 a 2 5 . D. No. 61 t - )
B. iy. Evi nc A tTr alR e di Te e A s A Publc Ent t de e i gar ng l co i

Asa cur t y saedbyt Go r nti isCo olda e Res e i Opposto t c ael t t he ve nme n t ns i t d pons n ii n o

De e d n' M oinf rJ d me to Ac uta o Ne Tra ( E. 5 )t eGo e n n fn a t to o u g n f q itl r w il D. No. 61,h v r me t s

c le Ga yLis t t siy r ga di Haii n lw a publc i tt i : a ld r s ade o e tf e r ng ta a nd i nsiutons I s por oft al ga i r ga di t FCPA a Haii n n up t he le tons e r ng he nd ta brbe y lw,t Gove nme c le Ga y Lis de Hat' f m e i r a he r nt a ld r s a , iis or r M i se ofJ tcea t a horofabook on Haii publc nit r usi nd he ut t' s i ad i sr ton,a a e r i Haii n 1w a Ha ta publc m nita i s n xpe t n ta a nd ii n i i tt i l .7/ / 1PM pp.34- M r Lis deexpl ned nsiutons.Tr 25 201 37. . s a ai t tTeec wa wi l c i r d t bea Haiin publc e iy ha l o s dey onsde e o ta i ntt durng t r l va tmepe i a t theha cas i d Te e o as i he e e nt i rod nd ha d l sfe l c pa toft publca i sr ton i hi 2000 book. d. 60,61, r he i dm nita i n s 1 pp. 95,9 7. FN 1 M r Lis dee aned t thec : . s a xpli ha onduc ede e i r ea c t xt nsve es r h, i l ng lgalr s a ch a i e vi ,i r c nghi ncudi e e e r nd nt r ews n ea hi s co l i . e eg. Tr 7/ / 1PM pp.38,82ncusons Se , . , . 25 201 83.
M r Lis deexpli d t tTee wasesa ihed a aprvae . sa a ne ha lco t bls s i t i tt i i 1 butbe me apublce iy when,a ound nsiuton n 968 ca i ntt r 1 - t sa e owne N ai Bn oft Re i ofHaii 971 72,he t t d tonal nk he publc t

(' ' BNRH' a rd97 ofiss r s I pp.38,40,68.M r ' cquie % t ha e .d ) .

Lis de c ede t tt e c tm ea cic sa e oft s s a onc d ha he xa t i nd r um t nc s hi ac ston we euncla bute anedt tt Gove nm e ' quiii r er xpl i ha he r nts aci and ofi i ldoc e sfom t tmepe i r l t t t tons fc a um nt r he i rod eteced ha t a quiii a as umpton ofc r ha oc r d. d pp. he c ston nd s i ontol d cure l 8 81 96.M r Lis dealo c ede t t at 0- , . sa s onc d ha , lhough Tel o be n ec ga t us t t r ' A . , r t rt n ' A ' t r t e tis pa ta o e he e m ' M ' a he ha ' S ' S ' o el c t ril 2 sa e owne s p ahe t a quiii Te e o ne runde e a tt r hi r he c ston, l c ve m nt ny l ga pr e st c ng isna e 1 pp.41 42,96. e l oc s o ha e t m , d. -

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 6 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (306 05/09/2012 Page: 227 of 266

FN2: r Lis denot d t tS. de i t saprva ec po ai M . sa e ha A. sgna e i t or r ton i Ha t a t tt a ton oft i tal' . i c t t tt n ii nd ha he ddii he nii ' ' ndia es ha he M ' co por ton i ami d publcprva ee e prs . r ai s xe i / i t ntr ie M r Lis det sii d t tTelcowas97% owne and 1 . s a e tfe ha e d 00% co r l d byt BN RH' s ce s ,hesa e o d Ba oft ntole he S uc s or t t t - wne nk he

Re u i o Hat (BRH', o ma yy as icu i d lig p bl f i ' ' fr n e r,n ldng t n c i' ) r

t tm epe i c r i t i c me .I pp. 41 49,60,95, he i rod ha ged n he ndit nt 40- , 96.Te e o wasnm by aboa d ofdie t sa age r die t , lc r r cor nd ne al r c or a1ofwhom w e ea n e by e utveor rs g b Haiis 1 r ppoi t d xec i de i ned y t' Pr i nt Prm eM i se ,a r l va M i se s I pp. 44. esde , i nit r nd e e nt nitr . d. 42, Thepeo ewho wo ke t rt e poltca a nt swer pl r d mde hes ii l ppoi ee e c i r t be ' i ag t 'wor ngf t ' i onsde ed o ' c en s' ki or he ' c publ publ a nita i 'i pp.61- whi M r Lis de i d as'he dmi sr tonp d. ' 62, ch . s ade fne ' t

e t ist a t saeu es t p ro m a dt giesr ie t t e ni e h the tt s l) o e fr n o v e vc s o h t

peo elvi i Haii a ' sa i tu e ... o t sa et pl i ng n t' nd ' n nsr m nt f r he tt o ' a

r a hismiso sa do j cie a dg as'I p 3 Tee owa e c t s in n be tv s n o l. d p. 6. lc s '

e ild t s i lteam e tunde Haii n tx lws a is ntte o pec a r t n r ta a a , nd t r ve swe econ r l d b t BRH.I pp. 53. e nue r tole y he d 49,
M r Li s de f t rt sii t tHaii brbe y lwsa id t . s a urhe e tfed ha t' i r a pple o s Teec ofi a sd i t r l va tm epe i I pp.56- I l o fcil urng he e e nt i rod. d. 57. n 2008, iipas eda a s tdic os e lw,i e d t c ba Hat s n s e s l ur a nt nde o om t publcco r pto t tr uie c rt n e oy sofTelco a i r u i n,ha eq r d e ai mpl ee e nd ot publci tt i t de a et i a s t , urhe c i ng her i nsiutons o clr her s e s f t r onfnni M r Lis desopi on t tTelc had be n c i r d apublc . s a ' ni ha eo e onsde e i e iy durngt r l va tm epe i 1 pp.58- 60,95. ntt i he e e nt i rod. d. 59, M r Lis dealo e ai d t t i 1 . sa s xpl ne ha , n 996,Hat pas e a ii s d mode ni to 1w i e d t prva i c ran s aer zai n a nt nde o i tze e ti tt owned c ompa e , ncudi Te e o, Te e o di no acua l be ni s i l ng l c but l c d t t ly come pa ta l prva ied t i 2009- 0. d pp.54rily i tz mtl 201 I 55.

M r Lis dest tmony t tTelc wasowne a c r l by . s a ' esi ha eo d nd ontoled t Haii n gove mentwa c r a e by nume ouswine s he ta m s orobor t d r t s es a vol nousdoc e ar evi nce Fore m pl nd umi um nt y de . xn e: *Robe tM t net sii d t tTeec wa asaer oi e tfe ha l o s t t owned c ompa ny a t ,whe hewor d t r he wasa go r nte pl e nd hat n ke he e, ve nme m oye whos s r s r Pa rc J e had be n ap nt by t e upe vio , tik os ph, e poi ed he

Pr i ntofHaii( .7/ 2011AM pp.11 1 1 15 ; esde t Tr 26/ - 2, 3, )

*J a Four a t sii d t tt Pr sde ofHaiia ntd hi en c nd e tte ha he e i nt t ppoi e s

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 7 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (307 05/09/2012 Page: 228 of 266

c i Pa rc J e asGe r Die t ofTel o,t ' t t ousn, tik os ph, ne al r c or ec he ' ae s

o d'' to a p o ec mp n ' fHat ( . / / 1P p wne '' i n l h n o a y'o ii Tr 721201 M p. na 31 3 ) -2 ;

.J n Di zt tfe t the la ned whie lvi i Hat t t ua a esi d ha er l i ng n ii ha Teec wa a ' tonai ed'co ny owne byt Ha ta l o s ' i lz ' mpa na d he ii n

gove n nt( . 1 201 AM p.64) r me Tr 7/9/ 1 ;

.Ant o Pe e t tfedt tEs ue zi Dike a Te r s oni r z esii ha q na , c y, nd ra' busne spa t r a HAW AIt dhi t tHat Te e o wa owne i s rne s t ol m ha ii l c s d a o r t d by t Ha ta gove nme a t the s w a Ao nd pe a e he iin r nt nd ha a n n

is r n ea plc to s b te b Ter t t t fe t( . n u a c p iain u mi d y ra o ha e fc Tr t 725201 AM p 7 - ) a d / / 1 p. 0 71; n

*J l M a s ,who wor d a Ao tsiid t tEs om rha ke t n, e tfe ha quenaz, i Rodrg ,a Dike t d hi t tt c r tt y wa t d t i uez nd c y ol m ha he ontac he n e o i ur wa wih a f egn gove n e and t tt t pe of ns e s t or i r m nt ha he y i ur ncet r ue t d a id onl t gove n ns a hey eq se pple yo r mentco r c s Tr nta t . . 7/ / 27 2011AM pp. 7 8.

Se alo eg.Gov.Exs 9197,1 1 ( n i urnc e s, . , . - 85- 87 Ao ns a e d c me t) Go Ex . 1 4 3 (x c tv o d r a itn o u n s; v. s 45 1- 5 1 e e u ie r e s pponi g Tee oo fcas. lc fiil)

( E. 5 a 5 8 . D. No. 61 t -)
l. I St andar ofRe e d viw

Dee a t mo ef raj d me t a q itl t s n t F d rlRul o Crmia fnd n s v o u g n of c uta pl ua t o e ea e f i n l r Pr c d r 2 Rul 2 p r t ag it v r it ob s ta iea dj d me t fa q itlt b o e u e 9. e 9 emis u ly e dc t e e sd n u g n o c uta o e
e e e i t r i i ufi i nte de t s t i t ve dit S.v Wilams,390 F.d 1319, nt r d f he e s ns fc e vi nce o usan he r c .U . li 3

1 2 ( 1h Ci. 0 4 .Th e ie emus s p o th t h d fn a twa g it b y n a 3 3 1 t r 2 0 ) e vd nc t u p r ta t e e e d n s u ly e o d

r s na edoub a m us bee ea o bl t nd t xami i a lghtm os f vor bl t t Gove nme .l ' l ned n i t a a e o he r nt d ' Al

ce i l yc ie mu tb ma ei s p o t f h j r ' v r it' I . rdbit hoc s s e d n u p r o t e u ys ed c. d i '

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 8 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (308 05/09/2012 Page: 229 of 266

Defnda sm o f ane ti lunde Fede a Rul ofCrmi lPr dur 33. Thi nle e nt ve or w ra r rl e i na oce e 3 s l

p r t aCo r t v c t aj d me ta d ' rn an w til f h itr s o j tc s rq ie . emis u t o a ae u g n n ' a t e ra i t e n ee t f usie o e ur s' g '

FED. CRI P.33. Suc m otonsa e' r nt onl wih gr a c uton. U S.v Campa,459 R. M. h i r ' a ed y t e t a i ' g ' .

F.d 1 21 1 51( 1h Ci. 0 6 .Tog a taRu e3 mo in 'th e i e c mu t rp n e ae 3 1 , 1 1 t r2 0 ) rn l 3 to ,'l e v d n e s p e o d rt l

' h a i a an thev r its c t a iwo l b amic rig of u tc t lt h v r itsa d. e v l g is t ed c, u h h t t ud e sa ra e j sie o e t e e dc tn ' y

US.v Mari z 763F. 1297,1 3( 1hCi.1 ) The emoi aeg a e onl i . tne , 2d 31 1 t r 985 . s tons r r ntd y n

e c p in lc s s I A n w til a e o n wl d s v rde ie c 'swarn e o l i: 1 x e to a a e . d e ra b sd n e y ico ee vd n e ' ra td ny f ( ) i t ee i e c wa i fc ds o ee a rtil( )t d fn a te rie d ec r t d s o e h v d n e s n a t ic v r d he ra; 2 he ee d n xecs d u a e o ic v r t ee i e c ; 3 tee ie c wa no me eyc muaieo i e c i ; 4 tee ie c wa h v d n e ( ) h vd n e s t r l u ltv r mp a hng ( ) h vd n e s
maei ; nd ()t e de ewasofs hanaur t tane tilwoul pr bl pr ea trala 5 he vi nc uc t e ha w ra d oba y oduc

dfee trs t' US. .T o o 4 2F.d 1 8 ,1 9 ( 1h Ci. 0 5 . ifrn eul. ' v h mps n, 2 3 2 5 2 5 1 t r 2 0 )
11 1. Anal i ys s A.

Evi nc t Es abls Guit4 de e o t ih l.

i z w he Rod i zfr ta guest t ' vi ncef ie t pr CarosRodrgue kne oft rgue is r hat he ' de e a ld o ove l
e se eoft c piac cha ge i Co Ioft l cm e ,t tRod i z c xitnc he ons r y r d n unt he ndi t nt ha rgue omm it d a te vi a i oft FCPA a c r i Count 2 t oug 8oft l c ment ort tCa l olton he s ha ged n s hr h he ndit , ha ros

Rod i zknowi y l unde ed f rgue ngl a r undsde i d fom t ofe e c ge i t I c m e as rve r he f ns s har d n he ndit nt

c ag di Co ns9tr u h21o t eI it n . S e( E. . 4 a 12 . h re n u t ho g f h ndcme t' e D. No 5 2 t - ) '

Rod i zwast Exe utveVie Pr i ofTe r a Es na wast Pr sd rgue he c i c esdent ra nd que zi he e i ent 3 que z m ove t a Es na i d o doptRod i ue sM o i n f rNe Tra w ih t e pton oft rg z' to o w il t he xce i he

ag me trg r i gsvea c .S e( E. . 4 ) r u n e ad n e rn e e D. No 5 6 .
t s ue z di notmovet a t spo in o Rod i z'moto Se ( E. q na i d o dopt hi rto f rgue s in. e D. No. 5 . 46)
-

8-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 9 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (309 05/09/2012 Page: 230 of 266

a CEO.M r Rodrg a g st tonl onewine sa til Tony Per z, hecon r l rof nd . i uez r ue ha y t s t ra , e t tole Te r ,c amedt tM r Rodrgue kne oft e se e ofa a ee ntt pay Robe t oi , ra li ha . i z w he xit nc n gr me o r Ant ne t Die t rofI e nai lRea i f Telc t r c vesdepa m e si e ha f he r c o ntr tona ltons or e o, o e ei i y nt n xc nge or
r duc i oft i ce owe t Te e o.I Hecli sM r Pe ezst tmony washe l e tons he nvoi s d o l c d am . r ' esi aviy

i mpea hedatti l I c ra . d

Th sCo r d s g e s Asd s u sdi S ci nlA) a o ,h Go e n n p o u e i u t ia r e . ic se n e to ( , b ve t e v rme t r d c d

y doc ntr e de aswelaswines c imai (n a tont t t tmonyofTon ume ay vi nce l t s onfr ton i ddii o he esi

P rzwhc wa c ro o ae b d c me tr e i e c a dwi s tsi n r g r igte e e ih s o r b rtd y o u nay v d n e n t s etmo y) e adn h ne

a e m e sbewe n Def nda sa Teec e utve . Addii ly, a c ael saedby t gr e nt t e e nt nd l o xec i s tonal as c ur t y t t he
Gove m e ti isCons i ed Re pons i Opposton t Def nda ' M oton f J m n n t oldat s en ii o e nts i or udgme of nt

Ac uta o Ne Tra ( E. . 61,h f lo n wa s o b t eGo e n n a til q itl r w il D. No 5 )t e o lwi g s h wn y h v r me t tra:

Attil t Gove n e pr ra , he r m nt oduce bot die ta c r tm sa i l d h r c nd icl t nta

e d n et s p o t h j r sv r ita ans Ro rg e o a1 vie c o u p r t e u y' e dc g i t d iu z n 1

co s Forexn e Pe e pr vi d die te denc t t unt . mpl , r z o de r c vi e ha

Ro rg zk e a o ta dj ie t ec n prc c ag d i Co n d iue n w b u n on d h o s ia y h r e n u t 1.Peezt tfe t thes cfc lyt dRodrgue (swela r esiid ha pe i al ol i za l s Es u na ia dDik y ta Anonea re t ' c e . q e z n c e ) h t ti g e d o ' c pt . a . p y nst h m i e c a g frr d cn ( ra s bls' n t t a me t o i n x h n e o e u ig Ter ') il'a d ha Ro rg e te 'o g au ae ( rz o aj bwel o e'Tr d iu z h n c n rtltd Pee ) n o l d n . . ' 72 / 01 AM p 7 -8 4 P r zf rh rtsiidt a Dik yt l /2 2 1 p. 9 (2 . ee u te e tfe h t c e od
hi t ti wasuli a ey Rodrgue sand Es ue zisde son t m ha t tm t l i z' q na ' cii o brbeAnt ne. d Pe e ' t tmony wa corobor t d by a e i oi I r zs esi s r ae mpl doc e ar e de um nt y vi nce. e eg. Go Exs 1 ,11 11 Se , . , v. . 01 5- 6, 11 1 9, 48.

Folwigt sc n e sto , d iu za t o ie temao i o l n hi o v rain Ro rg e u h rz d h j rt f o y

t pa e st t t r ryi t r e a i who wer us d t he ym nt o he hidpa t n e m di res e e o lundert brbe pa dt Ant ne a hi s c s ,Dupe val a he i s i o oi nd s uc es or r .

Se ,e. ,Tr 7/ / 1PM pp.1 7( r i t tf ngt t e g. . 21201 6-1 Arolga esiyi ha Ro rg e a t rz dt emao iyo tepa me t) Ba a d d iu z uho ie h j rt f h y n s. nk n
busne sr c dss wedt tRod i z sg d 1 c ksa i s e or ho ha rgue i ne 7 hec nd a horz ni wie ta f r t t t r pa t i e medire ; ut ied ne r r ns e s o he hid- ry nt r ais

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 10 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (310 05/09/2012 Page: 231 of 266

r se vi c k r ques f m sand e l t tche ksbe c t eque td a hec e t or mais ha c ut he t r pa t it r e a i ;s ntalte c nc lng c lng ca d deb hid- ry n e m di res e et r a ei ali r t owedbyone oft t r pa t i e me a i ; sgne t s m he hid- ry nt r dires and i d he ha J Locaor' D t ' uli ' e nt unde whih hundr of Cons tng'Agr eme , r c eds t a ofdola si brbepa nt t Ant newe e hous nds lr n i yme s o oi r lunder d. ,eg. 2- ,1 603.Thet tmony ofTeras a e See . , 21 28, esi r' a co a ,J e Arolga wa pa tc a l po ruli esa ihi c unt nt os r i , s riulry we f n t bls ng t tRodrg zkne a utt ilctnaur oft epa m e s ha i ue w bo he lii t e hes y nt : Ar olgat sii d t tRodrg pai c os at ntont Te r ' r i e tfe ha i uez d l e te i o ras fna es dec d whi h ve st pa a by t ng t i nc , i ed c ndor o y, nd, aki he ' ua 'se ofis ngc c r ss i tu t d Te r ' ' unus l' tp s ui he k eque t , nsr c e ras

e ly e t t ob c u d c me tto wa rq ie t j siy mp o e s ha n a k p o u nain s e ur d o u tf

t s pa he e yment.Tr 7/ 12011PM pp. 4,1 1 1 Tr s . 2/ 3- 3, 5- 7; . 7 20 2011PM pp.41 42,47- 56- 60,70,76- 79,8 / / 48, 57, 77, 2. Si lry, ua Di t sii t tRodrguezsgne t mia l J n az e tfed ha i i d he ' ' uli ' r e tbutneve r quie hi t s i an Cons tng'Ag e men r e r d m o ubm t y i cesa ne ras d hi a nvoi nd ve ke m bouthi q lfc tonst pe f m s uaii a i o ror t wor des rbe i t c r c . Tr 7/ / 1AM pp.77- 1 he k c i d n he onta t . 19 201 8.

Thet si e tmony ofPe e and J l M a s and t r lt d Aon rz om r ha he ea e i ur edoc l e s s ns anc lm nt , howe t tRodrgu kne t tTeec d ha i ez w ha l o wa o s wned b t Hata gove n e .Tr 7/ 2011AM pp. 8; y he iin r m nt . 27/ 7Tr 7 252011AM pp. 71 Gov. . - 1 ./ / 70- ; Exs 91 97, 85 187.

( E. 5 a 1 ,1 ) D. No. 61 t 2 3 .

t Th e d n ea til ss fkin t s p r t j r 'vedc o g i yb y n a e vie c t ra wa u f e t o u po the u ys r it f u l e o d

ra o a l d u t n as weg e h a i i fv roftej r 'vedc .Thi i n tac s i e s n b e o b a d lo ih d e v l n a o h u ys r it s s o a e n y

whc t itrsso j tc r q r t tt j r ' v r itb s ta ie Th e d n es p rs ih he n ee t f usie e uie ha he u ys edc e e sd . e vie c u po t

t ej r 'vedc ta Ro rg e wa g l b y n ar a o a l d u t h u ys r it h t d iu z s uiy e o d e s n be o b . t
B. Jur I t uc i . y ns r tons

Dee a t as ag et t h Co r er di i tu to tej r . fnd n s lo r u ha t e u t re n nsr cin h u y

1 . St ut ofLi i a i l t uc i at e m t t on ns r ton.

De e nt frta guet Cour 'mpr ry de e t def er quese i tuci ns f nda s is r he t' ope l nid he ens e t d nsr to i

' rg r i ter n i go tesau eo l tto s. .' S e( E. . 4 a 4 .A1 c u t o e adng h u n n f h ttt f i ai n . . e D. No 5 2 t ) l o n s f mi

-

1 0-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 11 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (311 05/09/2012 Page: 232 of 266

t i cme ha afveye rsaut oflmiai . 1 U. C.j328 Howe r t lngi he ndit nt ve i a tt e i ttons 8 S. 2. ve ,oli s

p r te p ru n t 1 U. C. 3 9 whe arq e ti ma et afr inc u tyi o d rt emitd u s a t o 8 S. j 2 2 n e u s s d o o eg o nr n r e o

ob an e de oft ofe ec aned i t tc r t i vi nce he f ns ont i n ha ounty. Upon a iato oft Unie St t s fl be or r tu. ofa pplc i n he t d a e , ied f e e t n n i c me ,i c tng t te de e ofa ofe ei i a f e g ndit nt ndia i ha vi nc n f ns s n or i n

c u ty t edititc u t e o ewhc ag a dj r i i a ee t o n r ,h src o r b f r ih r n u y s mp n ld o

i si t t ofe e s l s pe t r nni oft saut of nve tgae he f ns ha l us nd he u ng he t t e lm ia i f t o f ns i t c tfndsby apr ponde a eof i ttons or he f e e f he our i e r nc t e de e t ta ofki lr que thasbee ma f s h he vi nc ha n t a e s n de or uc e de a t ti r as bl a a s orr as bl a vi nce nd ha t e ona y ppe r , e ona y ppea e a rd t t tm et r ue twa m a t ts h evi nc i,orwa ,i he i he eq s s de, ha uc de e s s n s h f ei c r uc or gn ounty.

1 U. C. 3 9 ()1 .'A1 ro o s s n inu d rt i s cins l b gno t ed t o 8 S. j 2 2 a( ) ' peid f u pe so n e hs e to hal e i n h ae n (

whih t ofi i r ques i ma a e on t dae on whih t f ein c t aut iy c he fcal e t s de nd nd he t c he or g our or hort

tk sfn l cino t rq e t' 1 U. C. 3 9 ( ) es s e so i l tdt t rey a s a e ia a to n he e u s. 8 S. 5 2 2 b .Th u p n in s i e o h e e r ' mi

a c nnote e sx mont i tnala ton byt f ei gove n e i t ken be or t sa u e nd n xc ed i hs f s c i he or gn r m nt s a f e he t t t

o lmiain wo l h v o h r s e p rd.1 U. C. 3 9 /) f i tto s u d a e t e wie x ie 8 S. j 2 2 . Thi Co r p r te tli p ls a tt 1 U. C. 3 9 b s du o t eOf eo s u t emi d ol t u n o 8 S. j 2 2 a e p n h t f t ng r k

I e nai na Afar oft Unie St t De rme ofJ tc sofi i lr ue tt a ' ut iy ntr to l f is he t d aes pa t nt usie' fc a eq s o n ' hort a ofa f ei c r 'n t Re i ofHaiio J y 29, or gn ounty'i he publc t n ul 2008.Acc di y, lconduc fom or ngl al tr
a a trJ y 31 2003 woul be wihi t ve- rsa u eoflm ia i .Thi i l sa1 nd fe ul , d t n he yea t t t i t tons s ncude 1 co si t I ct e sncea 1oc r a trJ y 31 2003. unt n he ndi m nt i 1 cured fe ul ,

De e f ndan sfl d am o i t dimist i c me on sa u eoflm iatonsgr t ie ton o s s he ndit nt t t t i ti ounds

20 ( E.No.1 )a c lnge t sCour' Or rt lngt sat eoflmiai .( E.No. 4D. 71 nd hale d hi t de oli he t ut i ttons D. s Dee nt' i t dimiswasde e ( E. 240) fnda smoton o s s nid.D. No. .

Dee d nsatmp e t ito u eaj r i sr ci nr ltngt t esau eo lmiai n fn a t te td o nr d c u y n tu to eai o h ttt f i tto s
-

11 -

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 12 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (312 05/09/2012 Page: 233 of 266

a dt lig Ho v r t ev l iyo t li o d r aed cd db j d e a dno j re a d a n oln . we e ,h ai t f olng r e s r e i e y u g s n t u is n , s d s c Dee d nspr p s disr cinrg r igtesau eo lmiain wa pr p ryrj ce . u h, fn a t' o o e n tu to e a dn h ttt f i tto s s o el ee td
S eUni dS ae v Hu s n 9 2F.d 1 0 1 3(t Ci.1 93 (i dn t a cam p e e tn e t t ts . d o , 8 2 6 , 6 5h r 9 ) fn ig h t li r sn ig e

q e to o lw i aq e to f rt c u tn tq e to o fc f r u y . u si n f a s u sin o he o r, o u sin f a t o j r)
Thi Co t ope l de e m i d t r lva da ef t sa u e oflm iai nsba ed on s ur pr ry t r ne he ee nt t or he t t t i t to s

ist l n o d ra dp o e l isr ce tej r r g r ig sme S e( E. . 0a 1 ) t ol g r e n r p ry n tu td h u y e adn a . e D. No 2 t 4 . i

Be aus a1c soc ur e wihi t lm ia i pe i t r wasno lga ba i f pr di a c e 1 ount c r d t n he i ttons rod, he e e l s s or ovi ng sa u eoflmia i i t u ton ast t r m ani s t ntvec s tt t i t tons nsr c i o he e i ng ubsa i ount .
2. FC PA I t um e alt ns r nt iy.

Def nda snexta guet Co t i tuci r ga di asa eowne e e prs pur ua e nt r he ur' nsr ton e r ng t t s d nt r ie s nt

t t FCPA wa i c re t D. No 5 2a 4 .S e i l ' ehe tesaeo e o he s n o rc.( E. . 4 t ) p ct l ' t r h tt wn d ka y, wh

e e prs t Gove n e wine s sca med e s e i t sc s qua i d bas upon t ntr ie he r m nt t s e li xit d n hi a e lse ed he

c ag si t eI dcme t' Se I .Thi Co r i tu tdt ej r t t h r e n h n it n . e d s u tnsr ce h u y ha: '

An 'nsr m e aiy'ofa f egn gove n e i amea ora nc ' tu nt lt ' i or i r m nt s ns ge y t ough whih a f ncto oft f ei gove menti a ompls hr c u i n he or gn m s cc ihed. St t owned orsae- ontole co pa e t tpr de s r c t t aet t c r ld m ni s ha ovi e vies o he publc ma m e tt sde i ton.To de dewhehe i y e hi fnii ci t r Te e om muni tonsD' iiorTelco i a i tu e a iy oft lc cai Hat e s n nsr m nt lt he go r ntofHat,yo m a c i rf t r i udi butnot ve nme ii u y onsde ac o s ncl ng lm ied t i t o:

( )wh t e i p o ie sr ie t t ctz n a diha ia t 1 eh r t r vd s e vc s o he iie s n n btn s

ofH aii t;

( ) eh risk yofie sa d rco sa eg v r me t 2 wh t e t e fc r nd ie t r r o e n n

ofi i l ora e a nt b go r ntofi a s fc a s r ppoi ed y ve nme fcil ;

()t e e ofHaii o rhi ofTeec i l ngwhehe 3 he xtnt t' wne s p s l o,ncudi tr t eHata g ven n o amao i o Tee o' s a e o h iin o r me t wns j rt f lc s h rs r y
pr destnanc a s ovi l i l uppor s h a s i es s cilt x t uc s ubsdi , pe a a
-

12-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 13 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (313 05/09/2012 Page: 234 of 266

te t e ,l ns orr ve fom gove m e - a e f e ; r am nt oa , e nue r m ntm ndatd e s

( )Tee oso iain a dp iie e u de Hata lw, 4 lc ' bl to s n rv lg s n r iin a g

i l ngwhe he Tee e r s se usveorcon r lng ncudi t r lco xe cie xcl i toli powe t a nit risd i t d f tons a r o dmi se t esgna e unci ; nd

( whehe Tee oi wi ypec ve a undert t be 5) t r lc s del rei d nd sood o

pe f m i ofk ilo govem me a f tons ror ng t a r nt l unc i . Thes f t sa eno e usve,a no sngl f t wildee m i e acor r t xcl i nd i e acor l t r ne whe he Teec t r l omm uniatonsD' t orTelc i a i t m e aiy of c i Haii e o s n nsnz nt lt af e g go r nt l a ton,you do notnee t fnd t ta lt or i n ve nme . n ddii d o i ha l he f c o slse a a t r itd bovewegh i f vorofTe e bei a i t u e alt i n a l co ng n nsr m nt iy i or rt fnd t tTee i a i tume aiy. n de o i ha lco s n nsr nt lt

( E. 5 0a 2 , 4 D. No. 2 t 3 2 )

Th sCo r p o ryisr ce tej r t r u han n-xcusvemul -a trd fnto i u t r pel n tu td h u y h o g o e l i t f co e iiin i ta pemitdt ej r t d tr n wh t e Tee owa a isr me tl yo af rin h t r te h u y o eemie eh r lc s n n tu nai f o eg t
go nme .Se ( E. 5 a 23,2 . ver nt e D. No. 20 t 4)
3. D ei r el lbe at gnor e anc .

t t re n nsr c i he Def nt,wih not ng m o e ge r l a lget t'heCour e r d i i tu tng t enda s t hi r , ne aly le ha '

j r o d l e aein rn e'( E. 5 2a 4 .Th Co r'j r isr cinsi lde t u y n ei rt g o a c . D. No. 4 t ) e u t u y n tu to ncu d wo b ' s
r f r nce t dei r t i nor nc W ihi t FCPA i t u ton,t Cour si tuci ta ke e e e s o lbe a e g a e. t n he nsr c i he f nsr ton r c d

t eln u g o 1 U. C. 7 - d2( )3 ( saigt t h a g a e f 5 S. j 8 d - h ()B) ttn ha: ( p ro ssaeo midi ' n wig'wi r s c t c n c, A) e s n' tt f n s ' o n ' t e pe t o o du ta k h cru tn e o ar s li ()s hp ro i a r t a s c ic msa c , r e ut f a uc es n s wae h t u h
pe s i e gi i s h co uc , ha s h cic sa e ss r on s nga ng n uc nd t t t uc r um t nce xit ,

o t ts c r s l i s b tnilyc rant o c r o ()s c r ha u h e ut s u sa tal e ti o c u ; r b u h

pe s hasafl beleft ts h cicl sa e e ssort ts r on i' m i ha uc r lm t nc xit ha uch r ul i s t nta l c ran t oc tr A pe s i de d t ha es t s ubsa ily e ti o cl. r on s eme o ve s h knowl uc edgei t e de e s f he vi nc howst theors wa a r of ha he s wa e ahi pr biiyoft e se e ofs h cr um sanc unls he gh oba lt he xit nc uc ic t e, e s ors a ua l be ivest ts h cicl sa e doe note s. he ct ly le ha uc r lm t nc s xit

1 3-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 14 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (314 05/09/2012 Page: 235 of 266

( E. 5 a 26) D. No. 20 t .

Th Co r'j r isr cino g n r l eieaeino a c wa p o e a df lo d e u t u y n tu to n e ea d lb rt g r n e s r p r n o lwe s

El ve h Cic tPa t n Spe i I tuci 8 sa i t t e nt r ui ter cal nsr ton t tng ha : l a Def nda ' knowl dgeofaf c i a es e i pa t ac i e, f e nts e a t s n s ntal r of rm i' e ts noug t tt De e ntwa a eofahi h pr ba lt t t h ha he f nda s war g o biiy ha t f cte sed- unls t De e he a xit e s he f ndan a t ly be ive t f t t c ua l le d he ac di texit dn' s . ' i r t a da ofpostveknowldg ' whi h i t ' be a e voi nce Del ii e e'c s he e valntofknowl dge- oc ls f e mpl,i ade e nt qui e e ct , or xa e f f nda r e gesi a sna al r ns c i a bei st m one or nga n nci ta a ton nd leve he y pr pe t i ve i t ta aci n we et pr e dsofa o ry nvol d n he r ns to r he oc e n u a ulaci t butdei r t y a dsl r ng t tt m o y or nlwf tviy lbe ael voi ea ni ha he ne pr pe t di comefom an unlwf a tviy s heca de o ry d r a ul c i t o n ny k wl dgelt . no e aer So you ma fndt tade e ntkne a y i ha f nda w boutt unlwf a tviy he a ul c i t

i y u d tr n be o ar a o a ed u t h t h d fn a t( ) f o eemie y nd e s n bl o b t a t e ee d n 1 a tal k e a u t eu lwf l ci t, r( )h de e yr a o cu l n w bo t h n a u a t y o 2 a v r e s n y vi

t know bu delbe a el cl e hi e . o t i r t y os d s yes
ButIm us e pha ie t tne i nc c r e s s orf il s t m sz ha glge e, a els nes , oolsmes in'e s t noug t pr t taDe e ntkne a h o ove ha f nda w boutt t awf he ml ul a tviy. ci t

( E. 520a 36) D. No. t .

I udi i tuc i a t de i r t i nor ewa pr rbas o t f cua pr di a e ncl ng nsr tons s o lbe a e g anc s ope ed n he a t l e c t

etb ih dd rn til ' d l e aeino a c isr cini a p o raewhe tefcs sa ls e u ig ra.'Aq ei rt g rn e n tu to s p r p it ( b n h at

s uppor t i er nc t tt def nda wasa r ofahi h pr t he nf e e ha he e nt wa e g obabiiy oft e se e oft lt he xit nc he

f c i que ton andpum os y c rve t a d l a ni a1 oft f ct i or t hav a a t n si el onti d o voi e r ng 1 he a s n der o e

de e ei t e ntofa s e ntpr e i n. U S.v. t r o 231F. f ns n he ve ubs que os cuto ' ' Pate s n, App' 878,885 x

( 1hCi. 0 )( u tn Uni dsttsv Pe e - sa, 6F.d 1 5 ,1 6 ( 1h Ci.9 4 ) 1 t r 2 07 q o ig t ae . r zTo t 3 3 5 2 5 4 1 t r1 9 ). e

e nd lbe at ' i tuci n i pr pe l gi n i t e de es ppo t bot acua knowldgea de i r e ' nsr to s o ry ve f he vi nc u rs h t l The
-

14-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 15 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (315 05/09/2012 Page: 236 of 266

in rn e' 1 . (ii gU S v Ara , 8 F.d 11 9 1 43( 1hCi.1 9 :. g o a c . d ctn ' . . is 9 4 2 3 , 1 1 t r 9 3

Alhough die te de ewaspr s nt d t e t bls Def nda s acualknowl e oft t r c vi nc e e e o sa ih e nt ' t edg he

b i eysh me(e ,eg,Tr 7211 PM p 34,1 - 7 Tr 7 2 /01 AM p 7 - 2 , vde c rb r c e s e .. . / / 1 p. - 6 1 ; . / 22 1 p. 9 8 ) e i n e

wasa s ad e r ga di de i r t i nor ncei l ngpa e st s ct pa teswihout lo duc d e r ng lbe a e g a ncudi ym nt o pe ik ri t

the yme s See . , . r uii t c ny' nonna ba eq rng he ompa s l ckupdocl ttont s lmenai o uppor t pa nt.( eg.Tr
7 212011PM pp. 4,1 15- 7;Tr 7/ 2011PM pp. - 47- 56- 60,70,76- 79, / / 3- 3, 1 , 20/ 4142, 48, 57, 77,

8 ) Ac o dngy iwa p o e t isr c tej r o d l e aein rn e S e1 U. C. 78 2 . c r i l,t s r p r o n tu t h u y n ei rt g o a c . e 5 S. j b

dd- h)3)B) s ealoPates 231F.App' a 885. 2( ( ( ; e s tron, x t
C. Pr - r alR ulngs er i i .

De e nt as move f rane ti lbas o s ve a pr -ralr lngsma byt Cour. f nda s lo o w ra ed n e r l eti u i de he t

1 @ Se anc p ver e s

Ro rg e mo e t s v rh stilfo ta o c d fnd n Es u n z b s do () d iu z v d o e e i 'a r m h t f o-e e a t q e a i a e n; i r Es u n z '' ear s sae n st a if rn ilyic l t'Ro rg e ; i)ic nsse t q e a i ' -ze t ttme t h tn ee tal n upae' di u z (i n o itn s pr

) d fns sta 'u g s ah i he e rs o p eu c 't Ro rg z a d (i t et e r t a ee e h t ' g e t eg tn d ik f rj die'o d iue ; n ii h h o y h t s

Es na woul ' xe c s hi Fit Am e que zi d ' r ie s fh e ndmentrg sathi ti l' woul s e nty i ht s ra 'but d ubs que l

t siy tut ulyt ' l rf hi pr a r tsaeme saswe la a fr tvel e ul t ' e tf r hf l o c a iy s e res t t nt l s fima i y xc pae'

Ro rg e i asp r t til S e( E. 1 1a 12 . d iu z n e a ae ra . e D. No. 8 t - )

' eei ap eee c i tefd rls se fr on til o d fnd n swh aeidce ' r s rfr n e n h e ea y tm o j it ra s f ee a t o r n itd Th t g t e . Z hr v U S, 0 U. 5 4, 3 ( 9 3 .Th sr l i p riu al a p ia l t o eh r' a o . .5 6 S. 3 5 7 1 9 ) i ue s atc lry p lc be o '
c n prc c s s Un tdsttsv Ca s n ,1 2F.d6 , 51( 1hCi.1 9 ) J n til o s ia y a e . ie ae . s a o 3 3 46 6 1 t r 9 8 . oit ras

s q e a i i no j i i ta p rino Ro rg e 'moi nrltn t s v rnc .S e Es u n z dd t o n n h t o t f d iu zs to eai g o e ea e e o ( E. 5 . D. No. 46)

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 16 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (316 05/09/2012 Page: 237 of 266

p o t efce c a 'e v tei tr sso j sieb a od n tes a d la die ut o r mo e fiin y nd ' r e h ne et f u tc y v ii g h c n a n n q i f s y

i o sse t e dcs' f .( i n Rih r s nv Ma c ,48 U. 2 0 21 ( 98 :.'A)dsrc nc n itn v r it. # ct g c a d o . r h 1 S. 0 , 0 1 7 ' itit ' i ( c u t h u dg a t s vea c u d rRue 1 ( f h Fe e a Ru e o Crmia P o e t e o y o r s o l r n a e rn e n e l 4 o t e d r l ls f i n l r c dl ) nl r i t eei asro rs t a aj ittil udc mp o s as cfctil ih o o eo te f h r s e ius ik h t o n ra wo l o r mie pe ii ra rg t f n f h

d fn a t, rprv n t ej r fo ma i arla l j d me to g ito i n c nc .I a 5 9 ee d ns o e e t h u y r m kng eibe u g n f ul r n o e e d t 3 .

Th sCo r p o e l d ne Ro rg e 'moin frsv rn e Se ( E. 23 ) i u t r p ry e id d iu zs to o e a c . e D. No. 9 .
#

1 .

Br on A rg e . ut um nt

Rod i z al ge t tEs na ispr - res sa e e s 'nf r ntal i ul t ' rgue le d ha que z ' e a r t tt m nt ' e e i ly nc pae' i

Rodrgue a t c eaea bassf s ve a eunde Br on v i z nd hus r t i or e r nc r ut .UniedSt e ,391U. 1 t at s S. 23

( 9 8 .( E. 1 1a 1 6 1 ) Br tnp o i e t a l tn i tu to t tej r s o l 1 6 ) D. No. 8 t , - 0 . uo r v d s h t i ig nsr cins o h u y h u d mi

beus d dieci t tt sa e e sonl beus d a i tt c def ntunl st coe r tng ha he tt m nt y e gans he o- enda es he

de e ntssatm e i s ' f nda ' t e nt s o ' powe f l i rm i tng'a i tt no t tf i de e ntt t ruly nc i na i ' ga ns he n-esiy ng f nda ha

S a 3 - 6. u o tej r i u a l t f lo lmiigi tu to .S eBr tn, 91U.. t1 5 3 Br tn h u y s n be o olw i tn nsr cins e uo 3

e ude ' y t e sa e xcl s ' onl hos t t ment b a no t tf ng de e ntwhih die ty i plc t ac s y n-esiyi f nda c r c l m i ae o-

d fn a t'Uni dS ae v Be l, 21F.d 1 2,1 25( 1hCi.1 91. ee d n . t t ts . ae 9 2 41 4 1 t r 9 ) ' e

Thesa e e sr f r edi Rodrgue sBr on a g tt m nt e e enc n i z' ut r umentdo notdie l i plc t r cty m ia e Rodrgue 6 The e sa e nt aone a enoti rm i tng a a enotpr pe l e l i z. s t t me s l r nc i na i nd r o ry xcuded unde r
Brut on.

6 heesaeme si l ()a2006sae - s tt nt ncude:i r ttmentbyEs naz satngt tRodrgue ' d que i t i ha i z' ha mo ek o e erg r i t ee pe s s( fTerqt a heddi (i a2 9sae n b r n wldg e adng h x n e o ra h n i ' i) 00 ttme t y ' Es naz rgar ngRodrgue c r i ac a ta Teec rga di pa nt;a (i) que i e di i z onfontng ontc t l o e r ng yme s nd ii Es u n z' d p sto fo Ter' b n nztyp o e dng Se ( E. 1 1a 2 3 . q e a i e o iin r m ras a k p c r c e i . e D. No. 8 t - ) s
-

1 6-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 17 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (317 05/09/2012 Page: 238 of 266

I. I

I ncons s e D e e e . i t nt f ns s

Rod i z a s re t thi tilde e e a Es na istilde ens we em ut l rgue s e td ha s ra f ns s nd que z ' ra f es r ualy

a tg n si.( E. .1 1a 1 1 - 1.Toj siys v rn e'th d fn e o c - ee a t na o itc D. No 8 t , 0 1 ) u tf e e a c ' l e e e s s f o d fnd n s l

' t d ats tlom us bea a si t t poi ofbeng m u ualy e l i ' Unie St e v.Cas il t nt gonitc o he nt i t l xc usve.

Valnca, 7F. 494,498( 1hCi.1 .l rviwi deni ofamoton frsvea e,a e i 91 2d 1 t r 990) n e e ng al i o e rnc
c t l a k: our wil s

( )Dot ealg dc n lcswi c - ee d n s d fn e g t t e 1 h le e o fit t o d fn a t' ee s s o o h h

e s nceoft a lntsd e e se he ppela ' ef ns ?

( )Co dt j t ra o a l c n tu t s q e c ofe e t t a 2 ul he u. e s n by o sr c a e u n e v n s h t y
a omm odaest es e eofbot de e n s de e es cc t he s nc h f nda t ' f ns ?

( )Di tec n c s be thea p l n t c mpel gp eu ie 3 d h o :it u jc t p el t o o li rj dc ? a n ( )Co l t etil u g a loaetep eu ie 4 ud h ra j d e meir t h rj dc ?

Rodrgue a s re t the ' i d t pr ponde an n i z s e td ha ' gne he e s r t mountofc c t we t t he ks hat nt o he

' el o rto s ctdi t eI dcme t'D. No.1 1a 3 a dt a ' dd s a teo d r s l c mo ain ' ie n h n it n '( E. h 8 t ) n h t he i o t h r e s
boutt brbey s he ebec us hi he i l c m a e s of... que i' 1 Rodrgue cli d hedi notknow a Es naz . d. ' i z a me d
'ol di notr quiehi t ha knowldgeoft de al oft r a i hi wih HaiiTelc ' ' e d r e r m o ve e he t is he eltons p t t e o. ' I a 4.Es naz' de e e woul bet tno brb yocc z e d t que i f ns s d ha i er u r d.The ede e e ar notm ut ly s f ns s e ua l

a tg n si.Hy t eial,he u yc udh v d tr ne ta t b ieyd do c r b tta, na o itc poh tc l t j r o l a e eemi d h the rb r i c u , u h t y

c it ntwih hi de e e,Rod i z wasuna r ofi.Ass h,t de e sdo notc lc . onsse t s f ns rgue wa e t uc he f nse onfi t Se r nc o t gr ve a e n he oundsofi nsse def e wasnota opra e. nco it nt ens s ppr it
ii i. Byr G r d ounds .

Ro rg e b s dh sn x agl n o B r v Waiwrgh , 28F.d 1 7(t Ci. d iu z a e i e t r t t n y d . n i t4 2 01 5h r me

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 18 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (318 05/09/2012 Page: 239 of 266

1 ) Rodrg aguest tEs uena woul ' xeciehi Fit Ame 970 . iuez r ha q zi d ' r s s fh e ndme rg sa hi til' nt iht t s ra'
bu wo d s e n l t siytuhf l t ' a iy hi pr are tsa e e saswela t ul ubs que ty e tf r t uly o ' rf s e r s tt m nt cl l s

afr t l e c l ae' d iu zi asp r t til ( E. .1 1a 2,1 - 7 . fimai y x u p t'Ro rg e n e a ae ra. D. No 8 t 1 1 ) ve l od r os v r ac d f n a t ts o ' 1 ab n fd n e f rt etsi n ; 2 n r e t e e , o ee d n mus h w:' ) o a i e e d o h etmo y ( ) ( t s bsa c o t d sr dt si n ; 3 tee c pao yn tr a de fc o ted srd he u tn e f he e ie e tmo y ( ) h x ul tr au e n fe t f h e ie tsi n a d( )ta tec d fn n wo l id e h vet sil da aspaaetil' Untd etmo y; n 4 h t h o ee da t ud n e d a e tfe t e rt ra. ie ' Sae v M a h d , 0 F.d 1 3 1 4 ( 1hCi. 98 ) ' c t ed fn a t k st a tts . c a o 8 4 2 5 7, 5 4 1 t r 1 6 . ' e h ee d n ma e h t On trs od s o n ,h til o r mu tte ( )t mietesg fc n eo t etsi n i h e h l h wig te ra c u t s h n: 1 xn n h ini a c f h etmo y n i

rlt nt ted fn a t t e r o tec s ; 2 a ss t ee tn o p eudc c usdb te eai o h ee d n ' h o y f h a t ( ) se s h x e t f rj ie a e y h o s a sn eo tetsi n ; 3 c nsde j dca a miitaina e o o a d( )gv weg t b e c f h etmo y ( ) o i r u iil d nsrto nd c n my; n 4 ie ih
t t tmelnes oft moton. f o he i i s he i ' #. '

I hi m o i f rs ve a e,Rod i z a s re t tEs na ic d 'e tf ast t n s ton o e r nc rgue s e td ha que z oul ' siy o he t l c ofpa tcpa i andknowldgeoft De e ntwih r a d t t a lgedbrbe y s he e. ak ri i ton e he f nda t eg r o he le i r c m ' '

( E. 1 1a 1 ) Hes e uae ta Es u n z wo l n t e tf a aj ittila dt a D. No. 8 t 7 . p c ltd h t q e a i ud o t siy t on ra, n h t

Es na iwoul t tf a a s pa ae,s e ntti lt tRodrgue wasnoti ved i t que z d esiy t e r t ubs que ra ha i z nvol n he

b ieyshe Th s u s p o tda srinsd n ts o p eudc un e B d a ds v rn e rb r c me. e e n u p re se to o o h w rj ie d r yr n e ea c

on t egr hes oundsi notpr r s ope .
2. Spola i i t on.

Ne t Dee d n sa sr ta t emoint ds s f rs lain o e ie c ( E. x , fn a t se th t h t o imis o poito f vd n e D. No. o

1 )wasi opel de e D. No. a 4) Thi Cour dia r es 93 mpr ry nid.( E. 542 t . s t sge .
On Fe u r 22, br a y 2005, rafld f ba pt y i t So he n DititofFl i I Te r ie or nknl c n he ut r src orda. n
ReTe a Teec rr l ommuniatonsCop. 05 BKC- 21 On Aprl21, c i r , 11 2. i 2009,hetuseefld a t r t ie 1 8-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 19 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (319 05/09/2012 Page: 240 of 266

m o i wih t ba upt y c t o a ovet a ton t he nkr c our t ppr he bandonme ,desr ton,a dipos lof nt tuc i nd s a

Te r' rc r s ( E. 20 -) Th b n nztyc u t su d a o d rg a tn t mo ina d ras e o d . D. No. 8 3 . e a k p c o r is e n r e rn ig he to n

or rngt tuseet s r ec esoft or rona1i eesedpa te .( E. 208- .The dei he r t o e v opi he de lntr t ris D. No. 5)
e ecr c ly r ns te ba u cytuse fl a c rii t ofs r c t tt or rhad be n el tonia l ta mitd nkr pt r t e ied e tfcae e vie ha he de

t t o eo teee to i mal o iel t ( E. 2 8 6 .Th ee to cmaln tc ls o h s n h lcr n c in tc i . D. No. 0 - ) e lcr ni i oie it s

i l ncuded Ter sc por t l wye and Es na a Rodrgue spe s ra' or a e a r que zi nd i z' r onala t ne No tor y.

o j cin weema eb Ter , q e a io Ro rg e t tedo u n d sr ci ne e t u h b e to s r d y ra Es u n z r d iu z o h c me t e tu to v n ho g

t y we e a eoft Gover ntsi si aton r ltng t t sa i The Gove n e he r war he nme ' nve tg i ea i o hi cton. r m nt as e t t tneihe t De rme ofJ tc nort I em a Reve Se ie -Crm i l s rs ha t r he pa t nt usie he nt l nue nrc i na

I v siainDi iinrc ie n tc o ted sr cin ( E. 2 a 2 .Th yween t n e tg to vso e ev d oie f h e tu to . D. 2 5 t ) e r o icu e o t eee to i mal o iel t ( E. . 0 - ) n ld d n h lcr nc in tc i . D. No 2 8 2 . s
i . Gover ntAdi nme on.

Def nt c am e t tt ba upt tuse wasam e roft g r e ta enda s l i d ha he nkr cy r t e mbe he ove nm n nd

i r pel d sr y dt d c me t.( E. 1 3a 5, s 3 4 .A d fn a t c n ttto a mp o ry e to e he o u n s D. No. 9 t Ex . , ) e e d n ' o si in l s u

duepr es rght a e i i t whe de lngwih desr i orl sofe denc See Unied oc s i s r mplcaed n ai t tucton os vi e. t

ng to o imis o S ae v Na o s 7 7 F.d 1 4, 29 ( 1hCi. 98 ) l r l o amoint ds s f r t ts . b r , 0 2 29 1 6 1 t r 1 3 . n ui n

s iton ofevi nce ac tmus tr tc i rwhehert consiu i lvi a i oc ur e pola i de , our t q s onsde t he tt tona oltons c r d t ou go r nta t r r t rt nprva et r pa te . Col r v.Conne l 479U . 1 hr gh ve nme c o s ahe ha i t hid ris o ado ly, S. 57,

1 ( 9 6 (ttn t tti 'ete 1w r q iig s mes r o ' aea t n'os p r acam o 65 1 8 ) saig ha i s ' tld a e urn o o t fs t ci t u po t li f s t o voaino teDu P o e sClu eo teF u te t Ame d n .) ilto f h e r c s a s f h o re nh n me t'. '
Hee,t banknz c tuseewa r po i ef desr tonoft e de e.( E. r he pty r t s es nsbl or tuci he vi nc D. No. 1 a 4;D. No. 3,4) A ba u c tuse i no ago 93 t E. 208- . nkr pty r te s t vemme e oye orage . nt mpl e nt
-

1 9-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 20 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (320 05/09/2012 Page: 241 of 266

The ve s Cr mei v UntdSa e ,1 7F.d27 , 7(t Ci. 9 9 .' t see,lkearecei r,i an o l . ie tts 7 2 5 27 5h r 1 4 ) ' nzt i n

ofi rofcoul a nt byt c tdie t d by t cour, ndpad by t c tfom t fce t ppoi ed he our, r c e he ta i he our r he f undsi t c t Hei i no s ns a a tore o orofi e oft Unied St t s' I n he our. sn e e n gen mplyee fc r he t a e . d '
Alo,t ba upty tuse ace onhi own a wihoutt knowl s he nkr c r t e td s nd t he edgeoft he

i tc s n Go en n .S eUni dSttsv Si o 9 4F.d6 7( 1h Ci. 9 0 .Hed dno a ta a v r me t e t a e . mps n, 0 2 0 1 t r 1 9 ) e

a ntoft Gove nm e . '( tu teo a e t oatu tei o l s b e t ot F u t ge he r nt 'Aq r se r g n t r se s ny u j c t he o rh

Ame d n i ()t eg v r n kn w o a da q is e i tec nd c a d( )tetu te n me t f 1 h o enme t e f n c u e c d n h o u t n 2 h r se

a t d wiht i t ntt as itt gove n ti isi tgaor ora i sr tvepur es' I c e t he n e o ss he r men n t nvesi t y dm nita i pos . n '

r Ke l, 1B. 2 6 2 5t n T C. Ca. 00 ) Be a s t Go mme t swi o t e ro 31 R. 5 , 6 Ba k . D. l2 4 . c u e he ve n wa t u h

kno e oft ba uptyor ront desr cin ofdoc nt,se ( E. 2082) i di wldge ht nkr c de he tu to ume s e D. No. - ,t d
notknow ofora qui s ei t co c e c n he nduc oft ba pt tuse i desr ngt doc mwnt , t he nknl cy r t e n toyi he t s
an t tu t di nota twih t i e tt a ss t gove nm e i isi s i to d he r see d c t he nt n o s it he r nt n t nve tgai n.
Eve i t ba u c tuse aced a a a ntoft Gove n e ,whih t Cour d n f he nkr pt y r t e t s n ge he r m nt c he t oes

no a e De e nt mus s t gr e, f nda s t how t de toy e denc m e t t sa r ofco tt i l he sr ed vi e e s he t nda d nsiutona

maeil y s eCal r av T o et 4 7U. 4 9 4 9( 9 4 , n t a t d snzto of trai , e fo ni . r mb t 6 S. 7 , 8 1 8 ) a d h the e t cin t a,

e de s vi nce howsba f ih on t pa t t Go r nt Arz v Youn l d at he r of he ve nme . iona . gb ood,488U. 51, S.

5 ( 98 ) 8 1 8.
To mee t ssnnda d ofc tt i lm a e i iy s e Unie t hi t r onsiutona t ralt , e td St e v. ats Agur , U . ,a 1 -11 96 S. . a 2400,e denc s 427 S. t 09 0, Ct, t vi e mus bot pos es a e pa or val t twasa r ntbe or t h s s n xcul t y ue ha ppa e f e t e de wa de toye a be ofs h anaur t tt he vi nce s sr d, nd uc t e ha he de e an woul beunabl t obt n c f nd t d e o ai ompa a ee de e byot r r bl vi nc he r as e onabl a lbl mea Neihe oft econdii i me on y vaia e ns. t r hes tons s t t f c soft sc e. he a t hi as Tr ombet 467U . a 489.Defnda s r evi no i oft de t u ton oft de ea t i ta, S. t e nt' ec i ng tce he sr c i vi nc nd her
20-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 21 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (321 05/09/2012 Page: 242 of 266

fiu et ma ea yo j cino tkea ya to t p ee v t e d n ed mo tae t the alr o k n b e to r a n cin o rs r e he vie c e nsr ts ha t

sa r ofconsiutonalm ae ilt wasno me . tnda d tt i traiy t t

Addii ly,Def nt ca tona l enda s nnotpr bad f ih on be foft Go r ntbe us t ove at hal he ve nme ca e he
uc t i n o s s or Gove n e wa no e n a r oft doc e desr ton. Ass h, hem oto t dimi sf r m nt s t ve wa e he um nt tuc i
s iton ofe d e waspr ryde e pola i vi enc ope l nid. 3. Faiur t St ea Cr mi Of e e. l e o at i nal f ns

De e nt m ove t Cour t dimist i c me f f itr t sa eac i na f nda s d he t o s s he ndit nt or a lte o t t rmi l

o fns .( E. 2 3 .Fe ea Rueo Crmi l o e l e7 c( )p o i e ta 'th fe e D. No. 7 ) d r l l f i na Pr c dz ()1 r v d s h t' l e r l

i c me o i or i m us beapli c ie,a de i t wrte sa e ntoft e s tal ndit nt r nf maton t an, onc s nd fnie itn t t me he s en i

fcsc nsi tn teo fn ec ag d. .'FE R. M. 7 c () Fu t r a t o t u ig h fe s h r e . . D. CRI P. () 1. rhe, t '

g h tu ts o tes t e c o a id cme ti no wh t ri t e r e e t f h uf n y f n n it n s t ehe t l ki

co d ha be n m a mor de i t and c ran,butwheheri ul ve e de e fnie e ti t t c anst eeme soft ofe e it nde t be c r a ont i he l nt he f ns n e d o ha ged, nd s fcintyapprs st def nda ofwhathem us bepr pa e t ufi e l ie he e nt t e rd o m e t a i ca ea ot rpr e di a etke a ns hi f a e , nd, n s ny he oc e ngs r a n gai t m or t sm ia ofe e, t t r or s i l r f ns wheher he ec d howswih ac ur y t wha t c ac o e enthem a pl d af xt y ea onne a quit orc c i n, r c tal onvito

Ha n rv Uni dSats 28 U. 4 7 431( 9 2) g e . t t e , 5 S. 2 , e 13 .

Her t I cm e saese r elm e oft ofe e a de c i i i or ai e,he ndi t nt t t ve y e nt he f ns nd s rptve nf m ton

r g r n t eo e t cs S e( E. 3 .Th I dit n ma e Dee a t a r o t e e adig h v r a t . e D. No. ) e n cme t k s fnd ns wae f h

ofens sf whih t y mus de e a De e nt' o i t di mi st I c me f f e or c he t f nd, nd f nda s m ton o s s he ndit nt or f iur t sa eacrm i lof e e waspr ry dimis d. al e o t t i na f ns ope l s s e
4. St ut ofLi iat ons at e m t i .

Fi ly,Def nt as e t ha t Co ti opery de e t rm o i t dimis na l enda s s r t t he ur mpr l ni d hei ton o s s

rg r ige piain o t esaueo l tto a disr cinst t j r r g r igs me e adn x rto f h ttt f i ains n n tu to o he u y e adn n . mi
-

21 -

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 22 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (322 05/09/2012 Page: 243 of 266

( E. . 4 a 5 .F rt ra o ssae i S cin11B) 1, hsCo r p o ryi tu tdt e D. No 5 2 t ) o he e s n ttd n e to I( () t i u t r pel nsr ce h

j r r g r igtesau eo lmiain ,o l ga e piaino t esaueo l tto s u y e adn h ttt f i tto s t li nd x rto f h tt t f i ai n . n mi

D. Ru e4 Ob e to . l 4 j cins

Ne t Ro rg za g st t h Co r' 'd si no f rinr c r sEt raqfie t x , d iue r ue ha t e u t ' miso f o eg e o d a til ald o sa

s tsyRue4 Fe R. v. o a d 1 U. C. 3 0 ()1( -D)' ( E. 5 2a 5 . aif l 4, d. Ci Pr . n 8 S. j 5 5a ( )A)( . D. No. 4 t )

Ro rg e a s re o j cinsa tilha d c me t s n t Ter fo Tee o( c d iu z s etd be to t ra t t o u n s e t o ra r m lc whih
doc nt i l d Ter Baesl l)s dbeexcu dpurua t Fedea Rul ofCi l ume s ncude ra t abes houl lde s nto rl e vi Pr edur 44a 1 U. C.j3505.Se Tr 7 1 2011PM pp.1 1 The edoc nt oc e nd 8 S. e . / 9/ 23- 38. s ume s
c it d ofi c r ceved fo Telco whi h we eus d by Te r f i e nalpum os s onsse nvoies e i rm e c r e r a or nt r e

i udi i c pa e .Tr 7/ 2011AM pp. 9. ncl ng nvoie ym nt . 20/ 8-

I Uni ds ae v Pa k r 7 9F.d 6 , 3 ( 1hCi.1 8 ) t ec u t d te it n t t ts . r e , 4 2 28 6 3 1 t r 9 4 ,h o r a mitd n o e

e de c t sc rii aesf s rt t twe enotpr r d by t t tf ngwine sorhi vi nce usom e tfc t or piis ha r epa e he esiyi t s s c ompa To beadmit i oevi nceunde t busnes r c d e e i t t hea s ynle, ny. ted nt de r he i s e or xc pton o he r a l
'hepe s who a t ly pr pa e t doc nt ne d no ha t sii d s l ng a ot r ' t r on cual e r d he ume s e t ve e tfe o o s he

cru tn ile ie ea dt si n s g e t h i tu t rhn s . 1 . ctngIe Ca tl ic msa ta vd nc n e tmo y u g s t er r swo tie s' d (ii tl pi ' a Cop. . psCo l , 0 F.d 1 5 ,1 5 ( 1hCi. 9 3 ) ' ri irqurd' a t e r v Cu a Co.7 7 2 2 3 2 9 1 t r 1 8 ). ' s t e ie t t h No h
rcor bepr pae byt busne swhih ha c t oft m .'1 (ii Unie St e v e ds e rd he i s c s usody he ' d. ctng td ats . '

V y i- a o, 0 F.d 1 8 1 919 ( t Ci.1 7 :. e ta Br v 6 3 2 1 7, 1 - 2 5h r 9 9

Evd nc ma b a mi e u d rFe ea Rueo Evd c 8 34 ) v ni t ewin s a d ie e y e d t d n e d r l l f ien e 0 6 e e f h t e s n t
hi c s ompa y di no pr pa et r c ds norha fr thand knowldge ofpr pa aton oft n d t e r he e or , d ise e ri he
r c ds 1 So l ast r i e de e oftusworhi s oft r cor and t tt ywe e e or . d. ong he e s vi nc r t t ne s he e ds ha he r

pr pa e i t us lc s ofbusne s s h r or a eadmisbl #. Spe tcal whe a e r d n he ua oure i s , uc ec ds r s i e.f ci ly, n i

22-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 23 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (323 05/09/2012 Page: 244 of 266

tr t ke c t ofadoc nt t td s m a s usody ume , ha ocume i ' de' t 511 f pur e ofRul nt s ' ma 'by he 41 or pos s e

8 3 6 .Uni dsttsv Adf hn i51 F.d31 , 2 ( C. r 2 0 ) I ac mp n ' c ur d 0 ( ) t ae . ee it, 0 3 9 3 6 D. Ci. 0 7 . f o a y ' q ie , e a

us d a fld'ado e nd ie ' cume c eae by a he pa t t t tdoc e be om e t c nt r t d not r ry,hen ha um nt c s he ompa s ny' busne sr or 1 a 327, i s ec d. d. t He e, he Govemm e esa ihedt tTe r us t Te e o r cor f i e a r t l nt t bls ha r a ed he l c e ds or ntm l pur e ,s h aspa ng i c s a ke t m i t rc por t r or . Tr 7/ / 1AM pos s uc yi nvoi e , nd pt he n hei or a e ec ds . 20 201 pp. 9.Thes doc 8e umen sbe n eTe r ' busne sr or a we epr pe l i r uc d a ti l t cm ras i s ec ds nd r o ry ntod e t ra . Se Par e ,749 F.d a 633. e kr 2 t
E.

B e l r ve D e l aton. le i c ar i

x lrve, he urent i De e nt r s t is oft d l ai ofJ n M a Bele i t c r Prm e f nda s aie he s ue he ecar ton ea

M i se ofHaii a as e ti pr d newl di c r d e de t tTeec wa no a nit r t, nd s r t ovi es y s ove e vi nce ha l o s t n

i tume aiy oft Hatan go r nt ( E. s 5 3, 6 5 0, 81 Dee d n sb le e nsr nt lt he ii ve nme . D. No . 4 5 6, 8 5 ) fn a t eiv

l teBelrv d caainwo l h veafce t ej r v r ita t u , n i e te t a h lei e e lrto ud a fe td h u y ed c nd h s e tt s h m o l j d me to a q ta o n w til S ei .S e iial, fn a t a g eta 'ane sn il u g n f c ui l r e ra. e d p cfc ly De e d n s r u h t ' l st ta t ee n a df cu l rd c t fre c of n ec ag dwa t t( lc )wa aHata S ae lme t n a t a p e iae o a h fe s h r e s ha Tee o s iin tt o e i sr me tlt, n tusteidviu l e ly da E ee o weeHata g ven n wn d n tu n aiy a d h h n i d as mpo e t ' lc ) r iin o r me t r
o tcaswh m tt(i)Es u n z a dRo rg e alg dyb i d . .' ( E. . 4 a 12 . f il o h sc q e a i n d iu z le e l rbe . . D. No 5 3 t -) i '
De e nt contndt tt d lr to e t bls st t'hef ct lpr di a ef t FCPA f nda s e ha he eca ai n sa ihe ha ' a ua e c t or he t

o fns sa dr ltdc a g si a e ta dn ve e itd. D. No 5 3a 4 .Th yas fe e n eae h r e s bs n n e r x se ' E. . 4 t ) e lo '(

c t nd t tt Go r ntga nor a onswhy i co d notha obt i d t Deca ai on e ha he ve nme ve es t ul ve ane he lr ton

p irt r c ii gi o Au us 9, 1 .Se ( E. . 4 a 4 .TheCo r h we e fn t t ro o e evn t n g t 20 1 e D. No 5 3 t ) u t o v r ids ha t d caai np o ie n n wl d s o e e e i e c a dwo dn t v a fce t j r he e lrto r vd s o e y ic v rd v d n e n ul o ha e fe td he u y

ve dit r c.
-

23-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 24 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (324 05/09/2012 Page: 245 of 266

1 .

Re i ofDe l aton. cept c ar i

Ac r ng t t Gove nme ,on Augus 9,2011 i r e ve a c o t dec a ai co di o he r nt t , t ec i d opy f he l r ton,

da e J y 26,2011 fo Pa Cali who wast c t d ul , r m ul l, hen ouns lf rdef nda Parc J eph. Se e o e nt ti k os e

t or r d he clrton o ounsl ( E. 5 a 9) On Augus 1 2011,heGo mmen f wade t de a ai t c e D. No. 61 t . t 0s t ve

f Es na a Rod i z.I Furhe : or que zi nd rgue d. t r

Afe r evi t lte fom M r Ca l, heGove n e r c d tr ec i ng he et r r . li t r m nt ea he outt r pr en ai oft Ha ta Gove n t i l ngM r o e es t tves he ii n r men , ncudi . Be lrve t a c rai t orgi a pu pos oft J y 26 h le i , o s e t n he i n nd r e he ul t de lr ton.The Gove n e l n n t tt l te wa a t ly a ca a i r m nt e r ed ha he et r s c ual n i t m a doc ntc e t d i co c i wih Te e o' n e l ume r a e n nne ton t l c s mode i a i a wasnoti e ed t conve a poston t t m z ton nd ntnd o y ii ha Te e o wa nota g r nte iy,a ha be n i e r t d by M r lc s ove nme ntt s d e nt m e e .

Cal( n n w Ro rg za dEs u n z) Th Hata li a d o d iue n q e a i. e i n i

Go nme r ie a e t poston i hashel t oughoutt ver nt et r t d he ii t d hr he c s oft si tgai a pr e uton- t tHat Te e o was our e hi nvesi ton nd os c i ha ii l c pa toft publc a nita i durng t r lva tm epe i r he i dmi sr ton i he ee nt i rod. TheHata Gove m e ,and M r Bele i i pari ulr ofe ed iin m nt . lrve n tc a , f r t ca iy isposton on t si s Asar s toft e o lrf t ii hi s ue. e ul hos c nve s tons t Gove n e as it M r Bele i i pr pa i o r ai , he r m nt s sed . lrve n e rng

t ed caain atc e t t i r s o s a Ex i i 1( een fe, h e lrto ta h d o h s e p n e s h bt h r ia tr te'e o Belrv d ca ain'. h ' c nd leie e lrto ' s )
( E. . 61a 9 . D. No 5 t )

Dee d n sa sr t a :'l d c me tr e i e c s o t a t Fis De lrto wa fn a t se th t 'the o u nay v d n e h ws h t he rt caain s l

t r s tofa lte fom c he e ul e tr r ouns lf Pa rc J e Ri ha d Kl h, q.... r quesi a e or tik os ph, c r ug Es e tng n ofki sa e tfom t Re i ofHat r ar ng t Haii n 1 w a sa usofHaiiTelc f al t t men r he publc ii eg di he ta a nd tt t e o;

n tar q e tf ralt rfo a y n ivov di temo en z to p o e s' ( E. 5 a o e u s o et rm n o e n le n h d r iain r c s . D. No. 81 t e '

Thus c r r t De e nt ' l m s t Gove nme di notr c vet deca ai , onta y o f nda s cai ,he r nt d e ei he lr ton
untlAugus 9, 1a wasnotr s i ef pr mi t decar ton. i t 201 nd e ponsbl or oc ng he l a i

24-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 25 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (325 05/09/2012 Page: 246 of 266

Cont nt ofD ec ar i . e s l atons

Thefr tdecar to pr dest tT 'saLi ie Compa underc i s l ai n ovi ha lco ' i m td ny omm on lw, a

f u d do Au u t 2,1 6 b p i aeid vd ast e c mmo lw. ( E. . 81 1.l o n e n g s 2 9 8 y rv t n i iu l md r o n a ' D. No 5 - ) t '

f rhe saest t u t r t t ha ;

The 1w ofSe e r 1 1963 g an st Ha tan St t ora a pt mbe 6, r t he ii a e ny e he ot rStt body t ac r s r i Li ied Co pa e . Onc t he a e o quie ha es n m t m ni s Stt be om esas r hol ri mus ob ai ac ae c ha e de t t t n hangei t bylw s n he a

t c a g t eLi tdCo n ( A. t Li tdM i dCo n o h n e h mie mpa y S, ) o mie xe mpa y ( A. ) Th sc n ei e s nil oalw t eS aet a p itis S. M . i ha g s se ta t lo h tt o p o n t
r pr s nt tve t t Boa d ofDie t s Asf rasTc i e e e ai s o he r r c or . a l os c em e t c onc d, he ompa neve unde ntlga c nge a ke is ny r nve e l ha nd pt t o1 byl wsofLi ie Compa d a m td ny.

Bas d ont f r ng,Tlc hasne rbe n a untlnow i not e he o egoi o ve e nd i s aStt e e rs Si isf m a i t da e i ha a r mai a a e nt m ie. nce t or ton o t , t s nd e ns Compa unde c ny r omm o l w . n a

( E. . 81 1. D. No 5 -)
M r Be lrve pr de as c deca a i clrf i hi saeme sm adei t fr ta . le i ovi d e ond lr ton a iy ng s t t nt n he is nd
e ani t the: xpl i ng ha

di notknow t ti wa g ng t beus i c i i l ga d ha t s oi o ed n rm nal e l pr ee ngsi t Unied St t sort ti wasgoi t beus d i oc di n he t ae ha t ng o e n

s p r o t ag me tta , fe tetk o rb BRH E nko u po t f he r u n h t a tr h a e ve y Bn f t Re u i o Hat!a dbeo eismo r ia i n, lc wa he p bl f ii n f r t de n z to T o s c

notpartoft PublcAdm i sraton ofHaii Thi i he i nit i t. s s o ousy nott c e snce dmi t ttme,Tlc bel d t bvi l he as i , ng ha i o onge o BRH , c i a i tt i oft Haii sa e Tha doc nt whih s n nsiuton he tan t t . t ume ha bee sgne srcl f i e na pu pos sand t beus i d n i d ti ty or nt r l r e o ed n s ppor oft on- ng modeni ato pr e sofTc u t he goi r z i n oc s l o.

( E. . 813 (mp ssi o iia) D. No 5 - ) e hai n rgn l.

M r Be lrvea s expli d t tt saeme si t srtde a ai wer tu hf ,but . le i lo a ne ha he t t nt n he s clr ton e r t ul

25-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 26 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (326 05/09/2012 Page: 247 of 266

heunde sa potntalc uson.Heclrfe t t rt nds e i onf i a ii d ha : Thesa e e ofJ y 26, 1e anst t t t m nt ul 201 xpli ha :

( ) T owa sa tdi 1 6 a ap iaec mpa y 1 lc s tre n 9 8 s rv t o n ;

( Thepata modeniai of Tlcowasc ee i 2011; 2) ril r z ton ompltd n
and

()l t eitr a, oHata 1w e e e tbls e T oa a 3 n h n e v l n i n a v r sa ih d lc s i

publcl owne i tt i n. i yd nsiuto A1 t f csi t J y26,2011saeme a ecore t Howe , l he a t n he ul t t nt r r c . ver t sa e ntc n bec usng i t ke i isc r n c e snc he t t me a onf i f a n n t ur e t ont xt i e i omist f tt t a trt i talc eai of Tlc a pror t t he ac ha , fe he nii r ton o nd i t ism ode i a i i wasf l f de a co r l d by BIH, ot m z ton, t uly un d nd ntole t whih i apublce iyoft Hata sa e. c s i ntt ht iin tt

( E. . 8 -) TheGo en n dda ss M r Belrv i p e rngt esc ndd caai n. D. No 5 1 3 . v r me t i sit . le ie n rpai h e o e lrto
( E. 5 a 1 ) D. No. 61 t 0 .
Thus t ss , hi howst tM r Bel rve' s co de l r ton smpl carfedt con e sof ha . le i s e nd c a a i i y l ii he t nt

tetrtd caai n F rh r a d s u s di (I)E)3 ,h c ne t o tetrt e lrto wee h ls e lrto . u te , s ic se n I1( ( ) te o tn s f h ls d ca ain r

esa ihe t oug tti la wer known t De e nt durng ti lpr pa a i tbls d hr hou ra nd e o f nda s i ra e r ton. 3. Decaraton Co ai N oNe y Di c ve ed Evi nc And DoesNot l i nt ns wl s o r de e Af e tJur Ve di . fc y r ct

Asd tie i S ci nlB) a o e t etsi n o Mr Lisdea d e sdma yo t e eald n e to ( , b v ,h e t y f . sa d r se n f h mo

p3, p it r ie i t efrt e lr to Se ( E. 41 - ! 5 1 ) Tr 72 / 01 PM p . 8 on s as d n h is d caai n. e D. No. 7 B, ! , 6 , . / 52 1

40- 68, Asa c ae y saedby t Gove me i isRes e i Opposton t 42, 96. c ur t l tt he nl nt n t pons n ii o

De e d ns J it q e t o S au Co frn e( E. . 8 ) teGo e n n as p o u e f n a t' on Re u s f r tt s n ee c D. No 5 4 ,h v r me t lo r d c d

fve f twine s st te t bls d Telco wasa i t mentlt oft Hatangover nt i ac t s e ha sa ihe e n nsnz a iy he ii nme : .Ro r An o net si dt tTe e wasa sae- wne c be t t i e tfe ha l co tt o d ompan y a t t whe hewor d t r ,hewa agove nme e oy nd ha , n ke he e s r nt mpl ee
-

26

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 27 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (327 05/09/2012 Page: 248 of 266

whos s r s , tik J e ha bee a nt by t e upe vior Parc os ph, d n ppoi ed he

P e ie to Hat ( . /6 2 1AM p 1 - 2 1 1 ) r sd n f i Tr 72 / 01 i p. 1 1 , 3, 5 ;
@J a Four andt tse t tt Pr sde ofHaiia ntd hi en c esi d ha he e i nt t ppoi e s co i Pa rck J e a Ge r lDie t ofTel o,t 'tt usn, ti os ph, s ne a r c or ec hef ae s

o e '' to a p o ec mp n 'o Hat ( . / / 011PM p wn d'' i n l h n o a y' f ii Tr 7 212 na p. 313 ) -2 ;

@J n Di zt si d t thel a ne whielvi i Haiit t ua a e tfe ha er d l i ng n t ha Telco wa a' tonai e ' mpa owned b t Hata e s ' i lz d'co ny na y he ii n

gover nt( . 192011AM p.64) nme Tr 7/ / 9

.Ant o Pe ezt tfedt tEs ue zi Te r ' i hous a t ey oni r esi ha q na , r as n- e tom J mesDike a Te r sHaii busne spa t r a HAW AI a c y, nd ra' tan i s rne s t t d hi t tTee wasowne a o r t d byt Ha ta ol m ha lco d nd pe a e he ii n gove n ta t thes w an Aoni ur ea i ai r men nd ha a ns anc pplc ton s m itd by Te r de c i ng Te e o asa g nme owne ub te r a s rbi lc over nt d

e t y( . / 52 1AM p 7 - ) a d n i Tr 7 2 / 01 t p. 0 71; n
.J m M a s who wor a Aon,t tfedt tEs na i ol r ha, ked t esii ha que z , Rodrg z, nd Di ke t d hi t c r c t y wa ed t i ur i ue a c y ol m he onta t he nt o ns e wa wih a f egn gove nm e and t tt t pe ofi ur ncet s t or i r nt ha he y ns a hey

r q se a pl do l t g v r me t o ta t ( . / / 01 AM e uetd p i ny o o e n n c n rcs Tr 7272 1 e P 78. P. - )

( E. 58 at3) D. No. 4 .
De e nt r t ne a e r wine sbutdi notc l hi a ti .Ac r ngt t f nda s e ai d n xpe t t s d a l m t ral co di o ht pr tilNotc ofExpe tW ine sDicl ur ,Es na ' e r wine swaspr pa e t t siy e-ra ie r t s s os e que zis xpe t t s e r d o e tf
t t mnong ot rt ngs: ha , he hi .Te e o wa e t ihe asaprva ec lc s sabls d i t ompa i 1 ny n 968;

.TheBan ofRe i ofHat' a ui ii ofTe e o ' d no c nget naur ofa k publc ii cq ston s lc ' di t ha he t e c por ton t ti gove ned by cvi lw i or a i ha s r i la ' ' .Teec s't f a e oye a eno publcofi a sorpublc s r nt 'a ' r l o' ' a f nd mpl es r t s i fcil i e va s' nd ' e a

a1 n e t ej rs ito o p iaelwi 1u d r h uidcin f rv t a ' '

.' ete Ro et t ie(l rJ a Re eDu e v lwe eo f aso t eg v r me t ' i r b r An on n o e n n p r a r fkil f h o e n n n h
ofHaiid i t re oy a Teec 'a t urng hei mpl t l oi' nd
-

27-

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 609 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 28 of 28 Case: 11-15331 Date Filed: of 345) (328 05/09/2012 Page: 249 of 266

*' l o wa ,d i t perod oftmesi t i c me ,aprva ee iy unde ' ec Te s urng he i i n he ndit nt i t ntt r Hata lw . iin a ' '

( E. 3 0a 12 .Th e ie c Dee d n scam i n wl ds o ee b t efrt l rv D. No. 6 t - ) e vd n e fn a t' li s e y ic v r d y h is Bel ie e

de a a i wa kno t t m du i ti lpr pa a i a s wn i t re r wine s clr ton s wn o he rng ra e r ton s ho n hei xpe t t s

dico u e Ad iin l a d s u sdi S cinIB) M r Lis d tsiida t ma yo t s ls r. d t al s ic se n e to ( , . s a e e tfe s o n f he o y,

saeme smadei t fr tBel rvede a ai TheBele i de a ai n c ai no ne y t t nt n he is le i clr ton. lrve clr to ont ns wl

d so e e e ie c a wo l no h v a fce tej r v r it Ac o digy,ti hee y: ic v r d vd n e nd u d t a e fe td h u y edc . c r n l i s rb

O RDERED AND ADJUDGED t t ha

1 Dee da tCalsRo rg e 'M oi n frJ d me to Ac uta o Ne Tra ( E. . f n n ro d iu zs to s o u g n f q itl r w il D. Nos 5 2 5 3 aeDENI .4 , 4 ) r ED.
2.Def nda J lEs na isM otonst Ado Ca l Rodrque s M otonsf e nt oe que z ' i o pt ros i z' i or

J d me to Ac ui a o Ne Tra ( E. s 5 6 5 7 aeGRANTED. u g n f q t l r w il D. No . 4 , 4 ) r t
3.Es ue z ' M oton t AdoptRod i z' Re yt Gove n e ' Res et Doc t q na is i o rgue s pl o r m nts pons o ke

Enr Nu e 5 3( E. 5 6 i GRANTED. ty mb r 4 D. No. 8 ) s

4.J lEs ue zia Ca l Rodrgue sJ n Re tf St t Co e e a oe q na nd ros i z' oi t ques or a us nf r nce nd

Brei g S h d l ( E. 5 6 a dCa lsRo rg e ' M oi nt Co e Dic veya d ifn c e u e D. No. 6 ) n ro d i u zs to o mp l s o r n Re e dRe u s f rEvie tayHe rn ( E. . 81 aeDENI n we q et o d n ir aig D. No 5 ) r ED.

ooxs Axo ORDERED i ch mb r a MimiFlrda ti ! da o tb r2 1 n a es t a , oi ,hs p y roco e, 01 .

J SE . RTI O M NE 1N 1 . 7 STATES I STRI J CT UDGE

Copi pr de t es ovi d o: M a sr eJ gitat udgeM c ie Ally A1 Couns ofRe d l el cor

28-

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (329 05/09/2012

Page: 250 of 266

DKT. 629

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 629 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2011 Page 1 of 7

US F D25 ( v078.JlmetiaCr nl s DC LS 48 Re.90) ug n n i aCae mi
Pa eI f7 g o

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (330 05/09/2012

Page: 251 of 266

U ni ed St es D i ri C ourt t at st ct
Sout hern Dit ctofFl da s ri ori
M I IDI SI N AM VI O

UNI TED STA TES O F AM ER I CA

V.

JUD GM ENT I A CRI I N M NAL CASE Cas Num ber-1: 21010- M ARTl e 09CR. NEZ1
U SM Num ber 57400-11 . ' 2
el fnda : c el en Couns ForDee nt Miha Ros Co n e F rTh Uni d Sae : r r Fa a s u s l o e t tts Au oa g n e Jme Kouki ,Ni aMr c a s os col r k Cour Repore:Da W himarh t tr wn t s

JOEL ESQUENAZI

Th d fn a t sfu dg iyo Co nt)ltru h21o teldcme t e ee d n wa o n ul n u ts ho g t f h n it n. Th d fn a tsa j dc tdg it o tef l wigo fn es: e ee d n i du iae ul fh ol n fe st) y o
TI TLE/ SECTI ON NUM BER NATURE OF OFFENSE Cons r c t vi att pia y o olt he For i Cor u Pr cies egn r pt a tc Ac a t co twie t nd o mmi r fa r ud Vi ai oft For in oltons he eg Co nuptPr ciesAct a tc Vi ai oft For gn oltons he ei CoruptPr tc Ac r acies t Vi a i oft For gn oltons he ei Conup Pr tc sA c t acie t
V i ai oft For i oltons he egn Com z Pr ctce A c pt a i s t

OFFENSE ENDED
M a c 2005 rh

COUNT One

1 U. C. 3 8 S. j 7l

1 U. C. 78 d 2 5 S. j d 5 S. j 8 d2 l U. C. 7 d 1 U.. j 8 d5 SC. 7 d 2 1 U. C.j7 d 5 S. 8 d2 1 U. C. 78 5 S. j dd2 1 U. C. 7 d 2 5 S. j 8 d1 U. C. 7 d 5 S. j 8 d2 1 U. C. 1 5 () 8 S. j 9 6h

1 U. . j 8 SC. 1 5 ()1( () 9 6 a()B)i. 1 U. . j 8 SC. l 5 ()1( () 9 6a( )B)i.

N ove r20,2003 mbe

Two Thr e e
Fo l tr

De mbe 1 2003 ce r 6, Dec ember30,2003

J uay 23,2004 an r

Fi ve
Si x

Vi ai oft For i oltons he egn Coru Pr ctce A c r pt a i s t Vi ainsoft For gn olto he ei Cor ptPr ciesAct nl a tc Vi ainsoft For g olto he ein Cor u Pr ciesAc r pt a tc t
Cons r yt c m i piac o om t m one lt rng y amde i

Fe u y 3,2004 br ar Fe uay 1 2004 br r 9,

M a c 25,2004 rh M ach2005 r M a c 1 2004 rh , J 25, une 2004

Seve n
Ei ght Ni ne
Te n

M o y lunderng ne a i
M one lunde i y a rng

El n eve

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 629 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2011 Page 2 of 7

USDCF D25 (e.90) Jdmeti.Cr nl s LS 48 Rv0/8-ug n n i aCae mi
P g 2o 7 ae f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (331 05/09/2012

Page: 252 of 266

J y 28,2004 ul
Tw eve l

l U. C. 8 S. j l 5 ()1( () 9 6a()B)i. 1 U.. j 8 SC. 156a( )B)i. 9 ()l( ()

1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 5 ()l( () 9 6a()B)i. 1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 5 ()1( () 9 6 a()B)i.

M one l mde i y at rng M one lt i y amderng M one lunde i y a rng

J y 29,2004 ul
Augus 6,2004 t Augus 27,2004 t

Thite re n
Fouree tn Fi n hee

M one l nderng y au i

8 S. j l U. C. 1 5 ()1( () 9 6a()B)i.
1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 5 ()1( () 9 6 a()B)i. 1 U. C. 8 S. j l 5 ()l( () 9 6a()B)i. 1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 5 ()1( () 9 6a()B)i.
l U.. . 8 SC j 1 5 ()1( () 9 6 a( )B)i. l U. C.j 8 S. 1 5 ()l( () 9 6 a()B)i.

M one lunde i y a rng

M one l ndei y au rng
M oneylunde i a rng

Aug t27,2004 us Se e r20, ptmbe 2004 Sep e r20,200 t mbe 4 Ja r 6,2005 nua y J nuar 6,2005 a y M ach29, r 2005

Sit n xee
Se nte ve e n Ei e n ghte Ni t n neee Tw e y nt Twe y One nt

M one l y aunde i rng

M o lunde i ney a rng M one lunde i y a rng

Th d fn a ti sne c d a p o ie i tef lwigpa e o t sj d me t The s ence i i e purua t t e ee d n s e tn e s r vd d n h ol n g s f hi u g n. o ent s mpos d s nt o he

Se e ng Reor Ac of1 4. ntnci f m t 98

l i or ed t tt de e ntmus no iy t Unie Sttsator f t sdititwihi 30 da ofan c nge ofna , t s der ha he f nda t tf he td ae t ney or hi src t n ys y ha me r i nc ormalng a e suntla1 f s, e tmton, c ssa ds e il ses nsi o e b ti jdg n aefl p i. esde e, ii ddr s i l me r si i o t n p ca assme t mp sd y hs u me t r ul ad y l or r t pa r tmton,t defnda mus no iyt c ta Unie Stt atr y ofa matralc ngesi e no c f deed o y esi i he e nt t tf he our nd td aes to ne ny ei ha n co mi cic tnc s r umsa e .
Daeofl t mposton ofSe e e: ii ntnc Ocobe 25,20l1 t r

*f

J OS E. A TI M NEZ Un' d St tsDiti J ae srct udge

Ot e / ,01 cbr o 21

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 629 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2011 Page 3 of 7

US FL D 2 5 ( v. /8 -ugmetn&CrmiaCae DC S 4 8 Re 090) Jd ni i nl s
Pge3o 7 g f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (332 05/09/2012

Page: 253 of 266

DEF ENDANT: OELES NAZI J QUE

CASE NUM BER:1; 21 0- M ARTl 09- 01 CRNEZ1

I PRISO N M EN T M
Thedef nti herbyco tedt t c t y oft Unied Stt Bur auofPrs t bei ionedf atr enda s e mmit o he usod he t aes e ions o mprs or em of180mont . Thet r c it oftr of60mont ast Count 1t o h 8, t bes vedconc rntyt e hot rand hs em onsss ems hs o s hr ug o er ure l o ac he 1 mont ast Count 9t ough21 t besr dconcur ntyt e hot ra c e i y t t tr i edast Co s 20 hs o s hr e ve re l o ac he nd ons cutvel o he e m mpos o unt , o 1tr h ough8. TheCour ma t f l ngr omme to t t Bu ea ofPrs : t kes he olowi ec ndains o he r u ions Thi defnda s l de i tdt af iiyascl et Sout Fl i a pos i e,co itntwihdeenda s s e nt halbe sgnae o aclt os o h orda s sbl nsse t f nt c ou nd he fns n c he e nt s nvit d . ba kgr nd a t ofe ei whiht defnda i co c e of

Thedef ndanti r m anded t t cusody oft U nied St esM ar hal e se o he t he t at s .

RETURN

lh v e e ue t sj gme ta f l : a e x c td hi ud n s olows

Def ndantdelver on e i ed
a t

t o
,

wihac riidc yoft sj dg n. t etfe op hi u me t

UNI TED STATES M ARSHAL

By:

y S. r hal Deput U . M a s

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 629 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2011 Page 4 of 7

USDCF D25 ( v0/8 -ug niaCr naCae LS 48 Re.90) Jdmetn. i l s mi
P g 4o 7 ae f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (333 05/09/2012

Page: 254 of 266

DEF ENDANT: OEL ES J QUENAZI

CASE NUM BER:109- 01 CR- ARTl : 21 0- M NEZ1

SUPERVISED RELEASE
Uponr e efom i ionme , t defnda ts l beon s viedr ea ef atr of3 year a t Count 1t oug 21 elas r mprs nt he e n hal uper s el s or e m s so s hr h , , als htr t r c rtnty. l uc e ms o un oncu r l

Thedeenda mus r po tt t pr tonofi i t diti t whiht defnda i r las wihi 72hour ofr las fom f nt t e r o he obai fce n he srcto c he e nt s ee ed t n t h s ee e r ecusodyoft Bu ea ofPrs . t he r u ions Thcdeenda s lnotc f nt hal ommi a he f r l saeorl c i t not r edt a, t t ocal rme.
e an hal a ul s ss toled ubsa e Thedefnd ts l notunlwf ly pos e aconr l s tnc . The de e f ndants lr fai fom a u awf us ofa hal e r n r ny nl ul e c r l s bsa e.Thedefnda s ls bmi t oned ugt twihi 1 daysofr e efom i io nta a las t ontoled u tnc e nt hal u t o r es t n 5 elas r mprs nme nd t e t wo pe i c d u tsst r aRe,a deemi d byt c t rodi r g e t he e r s tr ne he our.
Thedefndants lnotposes a fr ar ,am m unii , de t tvedevke,orany ot dang ouswe e hal s s ie m ton srue i her er apon.

Thede e f ndants lcoope at i t colvc i ofDNA asdi ct by t pr i ofi . hal r e n he l ton re ed he obaton fcer

ltij d me tmp ssafn o arsi to ,tsac n iino s p r ie rlaeta tede e t yi a co da fhsu g n i o e ie r ett in ii o dto fu evsd ee s h t. f ndan pa n c r nce u h wi teS h d eof y nss e t ftij d me t t h c e ul Pa me t h e o hs u g n. h
Thedeenda mus c y wiht sanda dc tonst tha bee a e b t sc ta welasa a tona f nt t ompl t he t r ondii ha ve n doptd y hi our s l ny ddii l c tonson t atc pa ondii he ta hed ge.

STANDARD CONDI O NS OF SUPERVI ON TI SI

1 . 2. 3. 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 .

Thedee d n s lno la tej ii dsrc wih u t pe isonofh c uto po to of cr fn a t hal teve h udcal itit to the nnsi te o r r rbain t e; i
Th d fnd n s alr p r t t ep o to o t ri ama ne a d fe u nc dr ce b t c u t p o t n ofie ; e e e a t h l e o t o h r bai n fke n n r n r q e y ie td y he o r or r bai fc r o Th d fnd n s ala s rtuhf l a1iq re b t epr bain o fc ra df lw t isr ci n o t pr b to ofi e ; t e a a t h l n we r t ul l n uiis y h o to fie n ol he n tu to s f he o a in ic r y o Th d fnd n s a l u p r hi o he de nd nt a dme tohe f miyr s n i lte ; e e e a t h l s p o t s r r pe e s n e t r a l epo sbi is i Th d fnd n s al r r gua l a alwf l c u to ,u l s e us db t ep o to ofie f r c o lng tanng or t e a c p a e e e e a t h lwo k e l ry t a u o c pain n e s xc e y h r bai n fc r o s h o i , r ii , o h r c e tbl
I aS I ; C ' OIS

Th d fn n s aln tf t po to ofcra lattn(0 da p i t a yc ng i rsd nc o e oy n; e eeda t h l oiy he rbain fie t e s e 1 ) ys rnr o n ha e n eie e r mpl me t
Th dee da ts lr fan fom t ee e sv us o ac h a s a l t urha e p s e s u e dsrb t,o a miitra yc n r le e f n n hal e r i r h xc s ie e f lo ol nd h l no p c s , o s s , s , iti ue r d nse n o told s sa e o a yp r p r a i r ltdt a y c tol ds sa c s e e ta p e ci e byap ysc a ub tnc r n a a hen la eae o n onr l ub tn e , xc p s r s rb d e h iin; Thedee da ts lno fe ue t a e wh r c ntol ds b tn e a eilg lys d u e ,dsrbue ,o a miitrd; fn n hal t r q n plc s e e o r l u sa c s r le al ol, s d iti td r d n se e e Th d fnd n s a l t s o it wiha yp ro e ga di c i na aciiya ds al ot socaewi a yp ro c n ce o afl n s e e e a t h lno a s ca e t n e s ns n ge n rmi l tvt n h ln a s it t n e s n o vitd f eo y h u e sg a t dp nniso t dos b t ep o to o tc r nls r n e e s in o o y h r bain fi e ; Th dee da ts alpemi apr b to o t rt vii hm o he a a y tme a ho o e s whe ea d s l p r tc nfs a inofa y e f n n h l r t o ai n fke o st i r r t n i t me r le r n hal e mi o ic to n c n rba o e v d i pli v e b t p o to o fc r o ta nd bs r e n an iw y he r bain fie ;

1. 0 1. 1 1 2. 1. 3

Th d fnd n s ln tf teprb to ofcrwihnsve pt (2 ho s ben arse o q sin dbya1w e fre nt fie; e ee a thal oiy h o ain fie ti e nt wo 7 ) ur of ig retd r ueto e a nocme ofcr
Th d fnd n s al t ne it a ya r e n t a t sa i o ne o as t il e t alw e or e nt g n ywi o t pemiso e e e a t h lno e tr n o n g e me to c a n nf n r r p c a ag n of a nf c me a e c t utl r sin h w o tec u t a d f h o r; n As r ce byt pr baino fc rt d fnd nt h ln iytidpa t so rs st a ma beoc a i n db t edee d n ' c i na r c r die t d he o to fie ,he e e a s a l otf h r ri f ik h t y e c so e y h fn a ts rmi l e o d o pes na h so y orc r c eitc a d s l p r tt pr b to ofke t m a e s h noiia in a d t c nt m t d fnd n ' r ro l itr ha a trsi s n hal e mi he o a in t r o k uc tfc to s n o o i he e e a ts r c mp in ewi s h n tfc to r q r me t o la c t uc o iia in e uie n . h

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 629 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2011 Page 5 of 7

US FLS 2 5 ( v0/ )-ug ni aCr nlCs DC D 4 8 Re.908 Jdmztn i a ae mi

PRe5o 7 g f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (334 05/09/2012

Page: 255 of 266

DEFE NDANT: OEL ESQUENAZI J

CAS NUM BER:1: 21 CR- ARTI E 09- 010- M NEZ1

SPECI CONDI ONS OF SUPERVISI AL TI ON

Thede e nts l alo c y wih t f l ng a tona co tonsofs vie r ea e: f nda hal s ompl t he olowi ddii l ndii uper s d el s
Fi i Dicl ur Re re nancal s os e qui ment-Th defnda s l ovi c et a es t fna ili or ton i l ngdicl u e e e nt halpr de ompl e cc s o i nca nf mai ncudi s os r , ofalbusnes a pe s lf nc ,t t U. Pr ton Ofke l i s nd rona ma es o he S. obai t r.

NoNe De Ret c i -Thedeenda s lno a yf , s ii ori ran f t rde ,i udedbut lmie t l ns w bt sriton f nt hal t ppl or olct ncu y urhe bt ncl not i td o oa l ofc e tQrcr tc r c r s eihe asaprnci lorcosgne ,asa i vi ort ough a comor t e iy wiho , hws r di edi a d ha ge , t r i pa i r n ndi dual hr ny ae ntt , t ut G rto ani pemison fo t UniedStt sPr bain Ofie . s bt i ng r si r m he t a e o to fc r Per s bl Searc -Thedee nts l s mi t as arh ofhi/ pe s n o pr t c misi e h fnda hal ub to e c sher r o r opery onduce i ar as na ema ra td n e o bl nne nd a ar as t e onabl tmeby t U. Pr ton Ofier ei he S. oba i fc .
Reat Conc n Re t iton-Thedee nts l notown, ope ae, tasac ula ,bee o d i orpa tcpaei a y l ed er s rc i fnda hal r t ac ons tnt mplye n, rii t n n ma r i a r atd c r durngt pe i ofs r son. nne , n ny el e oncen i he rod upe vii SefEm pl loyme Re t iton -Thedefndan s lob anprorwrte a ovalfom t Cour befr e e i i o a y s lnt s rc i e t hal t i i itn ppr r he t o e ntrng nt n ef e plym e . m o nt

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 629 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2011 Page 6 of 7

US F D25 ( v0/ ) JdmetiaCr nl s DC LS 48 Re,908-ug n n i aCae mi

a e6o 7 g f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (335 05/09/2012

Page: 256 of 266

DEFE NDANT: OEL ESQUENAZI J

CASE NUM BER:1: 21 0- MART1 09- 01 CRNEZ1

CRI I M NAL M ONETARY PENALTI ES

The defndan mus pa t t alc i nalmone ay pe tesunde t s hedul ofpa nt o t Sc dul of e t t y he ot rmi t r nali r he c e yme s n he he e Pa yment s e. s he t
Tot As e s ent al s s m Tot Fi al ne Tot Re tt i al s iuton

$2, 100.

$2, . 200000

Resiui wih l ionme ttton t mprs nt ev aly m ng he o- enda s t az n t . 20346- M ari s er l a o t c def nt andwihJuan Di i Docke No 09CR- tnez.

l i f t ror r t tt d e nts l pa r tmton i t a t s urhe de ed ha he efnda hal y esi i n he mounto $220 ,00 Thsr si to i o dj itya d f , 00 . i etu in s we onl n t

Du igtep ro o ic reain p y n salbema ea flo :()i ted fn a te rswa si aFe ea Prs n rn h eid f n ac rto , a me t h l d s olws l f h ee d n an ge n d rl io ld tis( COR) o ,h nted fn a tmu t y5 % o wa e er e twadtef a ca o lg to si o e b ti n usre UNI j b te h ee d n s pa 0 f g s an d o r h i n il biain mp s d y hs n J d me i aCrmia Cae ()ited fn n d e n t r i al l o ,h nted fnd n mu t a $ 500pe qua tr u g ntn i n l s ;2 fh ee dat o s o wok n m coRj b te h ee a t sp y 2 r re
twad t fnanci oblgatonsi e i t sor r o r he i al i i mpos d n hi de .
.

teCo rma atrt t a me t c d l i teitrsso j tc .TheU. Bu euo Prs n , S Pr i Ofkea U. h u t y l ha p y n she ue n h neet fusie e S. ra f io sU. obaton t nd S.
Ator y' Ofi s l t ne s fce halmonio t pa ntofr tt i a r por t t Cour a mat i c tr he yme esiuton nd e t o he t ny eral hangei t de e ntsabiiy n he f nda ' lt t pa Thes payment donotpr l t gover ntfom usng a ohera ii t d o une c e fna i gans asset o y. e s ecude he nme r i ny t ntcpa e r xpe t d i ncal i , s ori omeoft deenda t s tsyt r siuton oblgai , Ther siui s lbema pa bl t Clr Unied Stts nc he f nt o aif he e tt i i tons e tt ton hal de ya e o e k, t ae Cou t, frwa dedt rs and o r o: U. CLERK' OFFI S. S CE AT'N:Fm ANCI SECTI l ' AL ON 400N. I IAVENU E,RM 8N09 M AM M I ,FL 331 AMI 28
.

Uponr e eofi r r i t de e nts lpa rsi i a t rt of1 ofm o hl gr seani ,untls htm ea elas ncaceaton,he f nda hal y e tmton t he a e 0% nt y os r ngs i uc i s

Ther siuin wilbef r dbyt Cl koft Cour t t vitmsont a tc ls. ett to l onvade he er he t o he ci he ta hed it

Th d fn a t s ma ersiuir(n ldigc mmu iyrsi t n t tefl wigpa e si tea u tl tdb lw. e ee d n mu t k et toticu n o nt ett i ) o h ol n y e n h mo n i e eo t uo o s
l t de e ntma sa pa talpa nt e h pa s lr ei a a oxi t y pr tone pa nt unls f he f nda ke ri yme , ac yee hal ec ve n ppr mael opori d yme , e s s iid ot r s i t pro iy or rorpe c t pa ntc umn bel . Howeve ,purua t 18U . C. pecfe he wie n he irt de r enage yme ol ow r s nt o S. j3 4 1, l 66 4) al nonf r lvitmsmus bepadbef et Unie St tsi pad. ede a ci t i or he td ae s i
oriy der Pri t O r orPe ent e rc ag ofPavm ent

N am eofPave e Se V i i sLit t ctm s

Tot Am ount al ofLos s

Am ountof Resiuton O r ed tt i der

SAmountofLos s

$2, 000 200,

# n ig frtettl momt ls e aerq rdu d r p esl 9 , l 0 1 O a d 1 3 of te1 , tdS ae Co e f r fe s sc mmitd( Fid n s o h oa a t of os s r e ui n e Cha tr 0 A 1 , I A, n l A Ti 8 Uni tts d , o o fn e o te m e l e oralerSe e er1 1 bu bef eAprl23,1996. t ptmb 3, 994, t or i

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 629 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2011 Page 7 of 7

USDCF D 2 5 (e.90)-ug n iaCr nl s LS 4 8 Rv0/8 Jdmetn i aCae mi

Pg 7o 7 ae f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (336 05/09/2012

Page: 257 of 266

DEF ENDANT: OELES J QUENAZI

CASE NUM BER:109- 01 CR- ARTI : 21 0- M NEZ1

SCH EDULE O F PAYM ENTS

Ha ngasesedt de e ntsa lt t pa pa ntoft tt c i nalmo ay pe lisa edueasf l : vi s s he f nda ' biiy o y, yme he oal rmi netr nate r olows A.Lump s pa ntof$2,B0. i dit y,balnced um yme 1 Due mme ael a ue Unls t c t se es l or edoher s ,itij g n i ossmp io me tpame t f rmia mo tr p n le e s he om'ha xpr sy der t wie fhsud me tmp e i rsn n, y n o ci n l neay e at s i i duedurngi ionment Alc i na m o aype te , e e hos yme smadet ought Fe r Btr uofPrs ' s i mprs , l rmi l netr nalis xc ptt epa nt ions hr he de al tea l t Fi nci Re ponsbiiyPr gr m , a emadet t cek oft c t nmae na al s i lt o a r o he lr he our.
Thtdtfnda ts lr cevec e tf alpa nt pr vi l ma t r an c i nalmo tr pe lisi e n hal e i r di or l yme s e ousy de owa d y rmi nea y nate mpos d. e Theas e s s s mentfner tt i i payabl t t CLERK.UNI /i /esiuton s e o he TED STATES COURTS and i t beaddr s e t so e s d o: U. CLERK ' OFFI S. S CE ATTN:FI NANCI SECTI AL ON 400 NORTH M I IAVENUE,ROOM 8N09 AM M I I FLORI 331 AM , DA 28 7716
Thea s s s es mentfne r s iuton i payabl i m edi el . TheU. Bur auofPrsons U. Pr i Ofi and t U.S. /i / e tt i s em at y S. e i , S. obaton fee he Atorney' Ofkear r sponsbl f t e or t s f ee i e or he nf ceme oft sor r nt hi de .

J n a Seveal oit nd r

Defnda a Co- f ntNa a Ca eNu r , a Amount J nta SevealAmot ,a c r s ndi pa e. e nt nd Deenda mes nd s mbe s Totl r mt nd ore po ng ye , oi nd

o o ez Antni Per J nFour nd ea ca Robe tAnt ne r oi

0920347- M ARTm EZ CR1 20062- M ART1 0CRNEZ 09- 01 CR- ARTl 21 0- M NEZ

$2, 000. 200, $2, 000. 200, $2, 000. 200,

Pametsal apidi h flo n odr() ses n,2 rsiuinji i l(lettt nitrs,4 f picpa, y nsh lbe p le nteolwig re:1assmet()et to rncpa,3rsiui neet()me rni l t o
()tn itrs, 6 c mmu iyrsiuin,7 p n lis a d()c ss icu lgc s o p oe uina dc u t o t 5 ie neet( ) o nt et to t ) e ate, n 8 ot,n ldn o t f r sc to n o rc ss t
.

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (337 05/09/2012

Page: 258 of 266

DKT. 638

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 638 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2011 Page 1 of 8

US F D 2 5 ( v0/8 -ug n iaCr n.C&e DC LS 4 8 Re.90) Jdmetn . i a s mi l Pa 1o 8 ge f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (338 05/09/2012

Page: 259 of 266

Dat ofOrgi Judgm v : OCTOBER 25,2011 e i nal nt

( Daet Las Ame dJud nt Or t ) t nde gme ) f Reas f Am endm ent on or : Z C r cino S nec o Re n (8U... 7 29() n () or t f etn e n mad l SC 3 4 ( 1 a d 2) eo Z R d cino S nec fr ag dCi u tne (e , C i e ut f etn e o Chn t r msa csF d R. r o c m.
P.5b) 3 ()

Z Mo i ct no S pri o C n io s 1 U.. j 3 6 /) r 53e) dt ao f u evs n o dt n (8 SC. j 53 o 3 8 () ii i i Z Mo ii t no I oe T r o I r o meto E t odn r a d df ai f mp sd em fmpi n n fr xr riay n co s a

Co ligRes n (8U.. j3 8 ()l) mpel ao s l SC. 5 2c() n

Z C r cino S ne b S ne cn C utF d R. r P 3 () or t f etn e y e tn ig o r (e , C i . 5a) eo m, Z C r cino S nec fr eia Mi ae(e R, i P. ) or t f e tn e o Cl c l s k F d Crm. 36 eo r t

.

Z Mo ii t no l oe T r o l rsn n fr erat e df ai f mp sd em fmpi meto R toci co o v

t teS ne cn Guitie (8U.. j3 8 ()2) o h e tnig dln s 1 SC. 5 2c( )

Z Di c Moint DircCo r r t t o s it ut e o t Z 2 U... 2 5 o 8 SC j 2 5 r ( 1 U,, j 5 9c() Zl 8 SC. 3 5 ()7 Z Mo ict no RetuinO d r 1 U... 3 6 ) df ai f stt re (8 SC j 6 4 i o i o

### Gover entsM oton t Rel c nm ' i o fe t t O rder ofFor eiur he f t e

t at s ri U ni ed St es D i t ct C ourt
Sout hern D i ri ofFl da st ct ori
M I IDI SI AM VI ON
AM ENDED

UM TED STATES OF AM ERI CA

JUDG M ENT I A CRI I N M NAL CA SE

CaseNum ber-1: 21010- M A RTI 09CRNEZ1

JOEL ESQUENAZI
USM N umber 57400-112 . '
el fnda : chaelRosn c Couns ForDee nt Mi Couns ForTheUniedSt es Aurr Faga el t at : oa n, Jme Koukis Niol Mr ck a s o, c a az Cour Re tr: t pore Dawn Whimas t rh

Th d fn a t sfu dg iyo Comts 1trug 21o tel it n . e ee d n wa o n ul n t t) h o h fh ndcme t t Th d fn a ti aj dctdg iyo tef lwigo fn es: e ee d n s du iae ul fh ol n fe st) t o
TI TLE/ SECTI N O NUM BER N ATURE O F O FFEN SE Co piac t vi at t ns r y o ol e he For i Coru Pr ci s egn r pt a tce A c a t c mi w ie t nd o om t r faud r O FFENSE END ED M a c 2005 rh CO UNT
One

1 U. C. 3 8 S. j 71

1 U. C. 78 d 2 5 S. j d 1 U. C. 78 d 2 5 S. j d -

Vi ai oft For gn oltons he ei Co r Pr ciesAc rupt a tc t

Vi ai oft For gn oltons he ei Coru Pr ciesAc r pt a tc t

N ove ber20,2003 m

Two

De emberl 2003 c 6,

Tlr e le

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 638 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2011 Page 2 of 8

US FLD2 8( v0/8 -kg niaCr n.C.e DC S 45 Re,90) Jl metn i a s d mi l Pa 2o 8 ge f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (339 05/09/2012

Page: 260 of 266

Fo ur

1 U. C. 7 d 5 S. 5 8 d2 1 U. C. 78 5 S. j dd2

Vi ainsoft For g olto he ein Co r ptPr ciesAc r u a tc t Vi ainsoft For g olto he ein Coru Pr ciesAct r pt a tc Vi ainsoft For g olto he ein ConuptPr c i sA c a tce t Vi ai oft For in oltons he eg Coru Pr c i sA c r pt a tce t

De mber30, ce 2003 J r 23,2004 anuay Fe ua y3, br r 2004

Fe uay 1 2004 br r 9,

Fi ve
Si x Se ven

1 U. C. 7 dd2 5 S. j 8 1 U.. j7 dd2 5 SC. 8 -

1 U.. j7 d 5 SC. 8 d2 1 U. C. 1 5 () 8 S. j 9 6h

Vi ai oft For in oltons he eg Coru Pr c i sA c r pt a tce t

Cons r c t commi pia y o t mone l y aunde i rng M one lunde i y a rng M one lunde i y a rng M one lunde i y a rng M oneylunde i a rng M o y lund i ne a erng M one lunde i y a rng M o y l derng ne aun i M one lunde i y a rng M one lunde i y a rng
M one lunde i ya rng

M a c 25,2004 rh
M a c 2005 rh M a c 1 2004 rh , J 25, 04 une 20 J y28,2004 ul

Ei ght
Ni ne
Te n

1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 6 a()B)i. 95 ()l( () 8 S. j 1 U. C. 1 5 ()1( () 9 6a()B)i.

1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 5 ()l( () 9 6a()B)i. 1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 5 ()l( () 9 6a()B)i.
1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 5 ()1( () 9 6a()B)i. 1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 5 ()1( () 9 6a()B)i.
1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 5 ()1( () 9 6a( )B)i.

Elven e

ve Twel Thit n ree

Fouree t n

J y29,2004 ul
Augus 6,2004 t

Augu t27,2004 s Augu t27,2004 s Se e r20,2004 pt mbe Sep e r20,200 t mbe 4 J nuar 6, a y 2005
J uay 6,2005 an r M a c 29,2005 rh

Fi en he
xt n Si ee Se nten ve e

8 S. j 1 U. C. 1 5 ()1( () 9 6a( )B)i. 1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 5 ()1( () 9 6a( )B)i.

1 U. C. 8 S. j 1 5 ()1( () 9 6 a( )B)i. 1 U.. j 8 SC. l 5 ()1( () 9 6 a( )B)i.
1 U. C.j 8 S. 1 6 a( )B)i. 95 ()1( ()

Eiht n g ee Ni te nee n
Twe y nt Twe y One nt

M one lunde i y a rng M one l y aunde i rng

Th d fnd n i sne c d a p o ie i tef lo n pa e o t sj d me t Th sne c i i o e p ru n t te e ee a t s e tn e s r vd d n h olwig g s f hi u g n. e e tn e s mp sd us a t o h

Se e ng Ref m Ac of1 4. ntnci or t 98

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 638 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2011 Page 3 of 8

US F D248( v,908-ug niaCrmiaCae DC LS 5 Re 0/ ) Jdmetn. i nl s Pg 3o 8 a: f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (340 05/09/2012

Page: 261 of 266

l i or e t tt deenda mus notf t Unie Sttsa t ney f t sdititwihi 30 da ofa c nge ofna , t s derd ha he f nt t iy he td ae tor or hi src t n ys ny ha me

rsd n e o mal ga de su tlal me ,ettto , ot a ds e il se s nsi o e b tij d me taefl p i. eie c , r in d rs ni 1f sr si in c ss n p ca a ssme t mp s d y hs u g n r ul ad i u y

I or r t pa r siuton,hedefnda mus no iyt co ta UniedStt at ne ofa mae i cha f de ed o y e tt i t e nt t tf he ur nd t aes tor y ny tral ngesi e n conomi c cr lmsa e . icl tnc s Daeofl t mpostonofSe e ii ntnce: Ocobe 25,2011 t r
; '
.' . . '
. .

J OSE E AR I NEZ td aes src udge Unie tt DititJ No mbe ve r ,201 1

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 638 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2011 Page 4 of 8

US F D 2 5 ( v0/8 -JdmetiaCrmiaCae DC LS 4 8 Re.90) us n n . i nl s Pg 4o 2 ae f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (341 05/09/2012

Page: 262 of 266

DEF ENDANT: OEL ESQUENAZI J

CASE NUMBER:1: 21 0- M ARTl 09- 01 CRNEZ1

I PR I N M EN T M SO
Thede e nti he e col tedt t c t y oft Unied SttsBur auofPrs t be i ione f at m f nda s r by nmit o he usod he t ae e ions o mprs d or er of1 mont .Thetr consssoft msof60monhsa t Count 1t ough 8,o bes r d c uren l t e hot ra 80 hs em it er t so s hr t e ve onc r ty o ac he nd 1 mo hsa t Coun s9tr 20 nt s o t h ough21 t bes r edc re l t ea h ohe a cons utveyt t tr i eda t Count ,o e v oncu rnty o c t r nd ec i l o he e m mpos s o s 1t oug 8. hr h

TheCour ma t f l ng r ommendainst t Bu e ofPrs : t kes he olowi ec to o he r au ions

Thi deenda s lbede i tdt af iiyascl et Sout Fl i a pos i e, onsse wihde e nt s f nt hal sgnae o aclt os o h orda s sbl c itnt t f nda s bac ound a t ofe ei whih t defnda ti co ctd of kgr nd he fns n c he e n s nvi e .

Thedef endanti r a s em nded t t cusody oft Unied St esM ar hal o he t he t at s .

R ETUR N

lh v e e utdt sj g n asf lws a e x c e hi ud me t olo :

Def endantdelver on i ed

t o

a t

,wihac riidc yoft sj dg nt t etfe op hi u me .

UNI S ATESM XRS TED T HXL

By:

Deput U. M ar hal y S. s

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 638 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2011 Page 5 of 8

US F D 2 5 ( v0/8 -ug n i&Cr n.Cae DC LS 4 8 Re.90) Jdmetn i a g mi l Pa 5o 8 ge f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (342 05/09/2012

Page: 263 of 266

DEFE NDANT: OEL ES NAZI J QUE

CASE N UM BER :1: 21 0- M ARTm EZ09- 01 CR1

SUPERV I SED R ELEA SE

Uponr las fom i ionme ,t dee nts l beons vie r ea ef atr of3 year ,a t Cot s1t ough21, ee e r mprs nt he fnda hal uper s d el s or e m s s o mt hr al s ht r t r co r nty. 1 uc ems o un ncure l

Thedefndan mus r por t t pr to ofkei t dititt whi t d enda i r l s dwihi 72holr of ee e9o e t t e to he obain f n he src o ch he ef nt s eea e t n zs r las m t cusod oft Burau ofPrs . he t y he e ions Thede e nts l tc f nda halno ommi a he f r l sat o l lci t not r ede a, t e r oca rme. The deenda s lnotunlwf l poses a c toled s tnce The de e f nt hal a uly s s onr l ubsa . f ndants lr fai fom a t awf us ofa hal er n r ny ml ul e c r ld s tnc Thedeenda s ls tt o dr g t twihi 15da ofr las fom i ionme a a las t ontole ubsa e. f nt hal ubmi o ne u es t n ys ee e r mprs nt nd t e t wo pe i cdr gt t t r fer asde emi byt cour. rodi u ess heea t , t r ned he t
Thedef endants lnotposes a fr ar ammunii desr tvede ce orany ot rdanger weapon. hal s s ie m, ton, tuc i vi , he ous Thedef endants lc rat i t cole tonofDNA asdie ed by t pr i ofi . hal oope e n he lc i r ct he obaton fcer

i ltij d me tmpoe af o arsi t n,ts o dto o sp rie rla eh th d fn n p yi a c r a c fhsu g n i ss i r ett i iiac n i n fu evsd ee s ta te ee dat a n c od n e ne uo wi teS h d eof y nss e t ftij g n . t h c e ul Pa me t h e o hs ud me t h
Thedeenda mus c y wiht sa r c tonst ha bee ad e byt scou taswela a addii l f nt t ompl t he tndad ondii hat ve n opt d hi r l s ny tona co to ont a tche pa ndiins he ta d ge.

STANDARD CONDI ONS OF SUPERVI ON TI SI

1 . 2. 3. 4. 5.

Th d fnd n saln tla et u iil src wi o tep r sinoftec u t rpob to ofie; e ee a t h l o e v hejdca ditit t uth emiso h o r o r ain fcr h

Th d fnd n s alrpo t ot ep o to e tc ri amn n ra dfe u n ydie tdb t c ur o pr b to ofie ; e e e a t h l e r t h r bain fi e n n e n r q e c r ce y he o t r o ai n fc r Th d fnd n s ala s rt t ul al n uiisbytep o ai nofke a d f l w t ei tu to of h p o to o fc r e e e a t h l n we nl l l i q re hf y h r b to t r n olo h nsr c ins t e r bain fie ) Th d fnd n s als p r h so h rde n n sa me tote fmiyr s o i iiis e e e a t h l up o t i r e pe de t nd e h r a l e p nsblte ; Th d fnd n s a l r e lrya alwf l c upain, n e se us dbyt ep o t nofie f r c o ig tanig, roh r c e t be e e e a t h l wo kr gua l t a u o c to u l s xc e h r bai fc r o s ho ln ,r i n o te a c p a l o
r s ea ons;

Th d fnd n saln tf tepo to ofcra Iattn(0 da sprort a yc n i rsd n eo e o met e ee a t h l oiy h rbain fie t e s e 1 ) y i o n hage n e ie c r mply n;
Th d fnd n s alr fan fo tee c si eu eo a c ho a s l no p c s , o s s , s ,d srb t, a mi sc a c n r ld e e e a t h l er i r m h x e sv s f lo l nd hal t urha e p s e s u e iti ue or d nit r ny o tol e s bsa c o a ypa a e lar ltdt a cmtold s bsa c s e e ta p e c ie byap sc a u tn e r n rph mai eae o ny t r l u tn e , xc p s r s rb d e hy iin; Th d fnd n s aln tfe e t a e wh r c n r lds bsa c sa eilg lys d us d dsrb e , a mi itr d; e e e a t h l o rqu n plc s e e o tol u tn e r le al ol, e , itiutd or d nse e e Th dee d n s al o a s c aewiha ypes n e g g di c i n l ciiya s a l t s o it wiha yp ronc n ce o aflny e f n a t h ln t s o it t n r o s n a e n rmi a a tv t nd h lno a s cae t n e s o vitd f eo , u ls g a td p r s int d s byt pr b to ofie ; n e s r n e emiso o o o he o ai n fc r Th d f n a ts alp nn tap o ai n o tc rt v sthi o he a a ytmea h meo ele e ea d s l p r tc nfs ai n o a y e e e d n h l e i r b to fi e o ii m r r t n i t o r s wh r n hal e mi o ic to f n c nr b n o s r e i pli ve b tep o t o fc r o ta a d b e v d n an iw y h r bai fie ; on

Th dee d n s ln tf teprb to ofke wihnsv nt-wo(2 hn so b i arse o q eto db alw e fre n ofcr e fn a thal oiy h o ain t r ti e e yt 7 ) ur f eng retd r u sine y a noc me t fie;
Th dee d n s al t ne it a ya r e n t a t sa i o me o as e il g n of l w e f r e n a e c wih u t p nniso e f n a t h lno e tr n o n g e me to c a n nfr r r p ca a e t a a n o c me t g n y t o the e si n o tec ur;a d fh o t n Asdr ce ytep o to o tc rt d fn n s al o iytidpate o rs st t ybeo c so db t d fn n ' c i na r c r ie t db h r bain fi e ,he e e da t h ln tf h r ris f ik ha ma c a ine y he e e da ts rmi le o d o p ro a hit r o c a a trsisa d s l pemi t epr b to ofie t ma s h n ii ai n a d t c nim t e d fn n ' r es n l so y r h r ceitc n hal r t h o a in fc r o ke uc ottc to s n o o tr h ee da ts c mpl n ewihs hn ii ain r q r me t o i c t uc otfc t e uie n , a o

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 638 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2011 Page 6 of 8

US F D25 ( v0/8-JdmetnaCrmiRCae DC LS 48 Re.90) us ni . i nl s Pg 6o 8 ae f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (343 05/09/2012

Page: 264 of 266

DEF ENDANT: OEL ESQUENAZI J

CASE NUM BER:1: 21 0- M ARTl 09- 01 CRNEZ1

SPECI CO NDI AL TIONS OF SUPERVI ON SI

Thede e nts l alo c y wih t f l ngaddii c tonsofs r s r las f nda hal s ompl t he olowi tonal ondii upe vied ee e:
Fi nanci Dicos Re r ment-Thedefnda s lpr dec al s l ure quie e nt hal ovi omplt ac s t fnanca i or ton,ncudi dicos ee ce s o i ilnf mai i l ng s l me ofalbusi s andperonalfna s t t U. Pr ton Ofk e . l ne s s i nce , o he S. oba i t r NoNe De Resrc i -Thedefnda ts lnotappl f r s i tori ura f t de ,ncl but tlm ie t l ns w bt t iton e n hal y o , olci nc ny urher bti uded no i td o oa , lne ofcrdiorcrdi c r c r s eihe asaprnci orcosgne ,a a i vi lo t oug a c po aeeniy, t t i s e t e t a d ha ge , t r i pal i r s n ndi dua r hr h ny or r t tt wihou frto ai ngper s i fom t Unie Stt Pr ton Ofk e . is bt ni mison r he td aes oba i t r

Pe misbl Searc -Thedee nts l s to as a c of she pe s orp ope t c r si e h fnda hal ubmit e r h hi/ r ron r ry onducedi ar s bl ma a t n ea ona e nner nd a ar s bl tmebyt U. Pr bai Ofke . t ea ona e i he S. o ton t r
Reatd Conc n Resri i -Thedee nts l notown,ope ae, tasac ula ,bee o d i orpa tci t i a le er t cton fnda hal r t ac ons tnt mplye n, ri pa e n ny ma r i a r aedconc n d i t pe i ofs vso nne ,n ny elt er urng he rod uper iin. SefEmplymentRe t cton -Thede e nts lobt npro wrte a ova fom t Cour bef ee e i it a s llo sri i f nda hal ai ir itn ppr l r he t or ntrng no ny ef empl oyme t n.

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 638 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2011 Page 7 of 8

US F D 2 5 ( v.90)-JdmetnaCrmiaCae DC LS 4 8 Re 0/8 ug ni i nl s Pg 7o 8 ae f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (344 05/09/2012

Page: 265 of 266

DEF ENDANT: OEL ESQUENAZI J

CASE NUM BER:109- 01 CR- ART1 : 21 0- M NEZ-1

C RI I L M O N ETA R Y PEN ALTI M NA ES

The defnd tmus pa t t alc i na monear pe list e an t y he ot rmi l t y nate mdert s ul ofpa nt on t Sc ul of he ched e yme s he hed e Pa n ss e . yme t he t
Tot As e s e al s s m nt

al ne Tot Fi

Tot Resiuton al tt i

$2, 100.

$2, 000 200,

Resiutonw ihI ionm e tt i t mprs nt

I i frh rod rdta ted fnd n s al yrsi to i tea u to $ ,0 , 0 Thsrsiuini o dj itya d ts ute ree h t h ee a t h lpa etuin n h mo n f 22 000 . i ettto s we onl n t
s vealy a ngt c def nt a wih JuanDi i Doc tNo.09- 346- M ar i z. e r l mo he o- enda s nd t az n ke 20 CR- tne

Du igt ep ro o i ac rto ,p y n s alb ma ea flo :()i ted fn a te r swa e i aFe ea P io rn h eid f ncreain a me t h l e d s olws l f h ee d n an g s n d rl rs n ld sre IT CORI o te ted fn a tmus p y5 % o wa e e re twadtef n il bi to si osdb ti n u tis LNI j b,h n h ee d n t a 0 f g s an d o r h ma ca o l in mp e y hs ga J d me tnaCrmi l s;2 ited fnd n d e n t r i al l o te h d fn n musp y$ 5.0p rq atr u g n i i naCa e( )fh ee a t o s o wok n m coRj b,h nte ee dat t a 2 0 e u re
twar t fna ilo i tonsi o d he i nca blgai mpos d i t so der e n hi r .
Uponr e s ofi r r in,hedee ants l pa r siuto a t r t of1 ofmonhl gr seani ,t is htmea ela e ncaceato t fnd hal y e tt in t he ae 0% t y os r ngs mtl uc i s

t Co rma atrh t a me t c d l i teitrsso j sie Th U., ra of rsn , S. r b to Ofiea dU. he u t y l ta p y n she uen h neet fu tc . e S Bu eu P io s U. P o ain fc n S. e
Ator y' Ofi s lmoniort pa ntofr tt i a r por t t Cour a maeralc ngei t d enda ' a lt t ne s fce hal t he yme esiuton nd e t o he t ny t i ha n he ef nts biiy t pa The epa nt donotpr l t g nme fom usng a ohe a ii t orune cedtna a g ns ases o y, s yme s ecude he over nt r i ny t r ntcpaed xpe t i ncil ai , s t ori ncomeoft defnda t s tsyt r ttton oblgatons Ther tt ton s lbema pa bl t Clr Unied Stts he e nt o aif he esiu i i i . esiui hal de ya e o e k, t ae Cou t,andf r r dt rs o wa de o:
U . CLERK' OFFI S. S CE ATRN: NANCI SECTI ' FI AL ON 400N .M I IA VENU E,RM 8 09 AM N M I I FL 331 AM , 28

Ther tt i wilbef war d byt Clr oft Cour t t vitmsont a t hedls. esiuton l or de he ek he t o he ci he tac it

y Th d fn a tmu t k rsi to (n l igc mmu i rsiuin t teflo n p ye si tea u tlse b lw. e ee d n s ma e etuin icudn o nt ettto ) o h olwig a e n h mo n itd eo t
l t defnda ma a pa talpa n ,e ch pa s lr ceve a a oxi tl pr porined pay nt unl s f he e nt kes ri yme t a yee hal e i n ppr maey o to me , es

s e iidoh r s i tep irt od ro p re tg p y n c lmnb lw.Ho v r p rua tt 1 U. C. 3 6 ()al p cf tewie n h ro i r e r ec na e a me t ol eo e y l we e, u s n o 8 S. j 6 4 1, l

nonf er lvitmsmus bepai bef et Unied Sttsi pai ed a ci t d or he t ae s d.
Prort O r i iy der ce age orPer nt ofPavm e nt

N am e ofPave e

Tot A m ount al ofLos s

A m ountof Res iuton O r e tt i der d

Se VitmsLit e ci s

s AmountofLos s

$2, 000 200,

* n ig f r h tt l mo n o lse aerq ie u e Ch pes1 9A, 1 ,1 O a d l 3 o Tie1 , i dSttsCo e f rofnssc mmitdo Fidn s o t e oa a u t f o s s r e urd nd r a tr 0 l 0 I A, n l A f t 8 Unt ae d , o fe e o te n l e oratrSe e fe ptmberl 1994,butb or Aprl23,1 3, ef e i 996.

( . ; L . '

--' '

! r 1

Case 1:09-cr-21010-JEM Document 638 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2011 Page 8 of 8

US F D 25 ( v.1/8 -ud niaCrmiaCae DC LS 48 Re ( 0) J gmetn i nl s 9

'

Pae8o 8 g f

Case: 11-15331

Date Filed: of 345) (345 05/09/2012

Page: 266 of 266

DEF ENDANT:OEL ESQUENAZI J

CASE NUM BER:1: 2101 CR- ART1 09- 0- M NEZ1

SCHEDULE OF PAYM ENTS

Havi as e s t defnda ' abiiyt pa pa ntoft t alc i na monear pe tesa ed a f l : ng s sed he e nts lt o y, yme he ot rmi l t y nali r ue s olows A.Lump s pa ntof$2,00.Duei um yme 1 mmedit y,baa due ael lnce

Une shec ut se pe syod rdoh m ieit su g n i o e i rs n n, a me t f rmiamo eayp n lis ls t o rha x rsl ree te s,fhijd me tmp s smp io me tp y n o ci n l n tr e at e
t hr he deal zea Prs ' i duedurngi ion nt Alc i na monear pe li , e t tpa s i mprs me . 1 rmi l t y nates exc pthos ymensmadet ought Fe r Blr uof ions I t Fi ncalReponsbiiy Pr a ar ma t t cl k oft co t nma e na i s i lt ogrm, e de o he er he ur. Thede e nts lr e vecedi f alpa me spr vi l ma t r an c i nalmo aype tesi e f nda hal ec i r t or 1 y nt e ousy de owa d y rmi netr nali mpos d.
Theas e s g s mentfner tt i i payabl t t CLERK,UNI /i /esiuton s e o he TED STATES COURTSand i t beaddr s t so esed o: U. CLERK ' OFFI S. S CE ATTN:FI NANCI SECTI AL ON 400NORTH M I IAVENUE,ROOM 8N09 AM M I I FLORI 33128AM , DA 7716 Theases me /i / e tt i i payabl i di ey. TheU. Bur ofPrs , S.Pr i Ofi and t U. s s ntfne r s iuton s e mme atl S. eau ions U. obaton fce he SAtor y' Ofi ar re ponsbl f t enf c t ne s fce e s i e or he or ementoft sor . hi der

J n a Se r l oit nd ve a

De e nta Co- e ntNa sa Ca eNumbe s,Tot Amount J nta Se r lAm omt a c r po ngpa e. f nda nd Defnda me nd s r al s oi nd ve a t nd ores ndi ye

Anoni Pe e t o rz J nFou c d ea r an Ro r An oi be t t ne

0920347- M ART1 CRNEZ 1 20062- MARTl 0CRNEZ 09- 01 CR- ARTl 21 0- M NEZ

$ 200, 2, 000. $2, 000. 200, $2, 000. 200,

Thedefndan ' rght ttea i ees t t pr t i ntfe i t or off f t e,whihhasbe n e e e by e ts i , il nd ntr t o he opery de iid n he der oreiur c e ntr d

teCo r a i ic r oae b rfrn eheen ih rb fretd.S ( 6 3 . h u t nd s n o p r td y eee c ri,s ee y o fie EE DE 2 ) P y ns h lbea pidi h flo n od r( ) ses n,z rsiuinpicp l() etuinitrs,4 f picp l a me ts al p le nte olwig re:1 assmet(lettt rn ia,3 rsi to neet()me rn ia, o t ()fn itr s,6 c mmu i rsiuint)p n le , n ( )c ss icu n c s o p oe uina dc ut ot. 5 ie neet() o nt ettto y7 e at sa d 8 o t,n ldig o t f r sc to n o rc ss y i