Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Preparation time may be granted for the oral diploma examination. Duration of the oral examination: approx. 30 to 50 minutes in total per candidate Presentation and defence of the master thesis Discussion about relevant subjects on the curriculum related to the topic of the master thesis Discussion about other relevant subjects on the curriculum There are two variations of the oral diploma examination: Var. I: Only one candidate is examined at a time Var. II: A group of candidates is examined at the same time (e.g. three candidates at a time). The following issues regarding the procedure of the diploma examination should be noted: At the beginning of their final semester (3rd semester or 4th semester with the ARIMA programme) the Director/Coordinator of Studies will appropriately inform the students about dates and assessment criteria for the diploma examination (via email and notice board). To determine the subject matter of the exam the candidates will be given a reading list in advance. This limited list of examination subjects is the basis for the discussion about topics related to the master thesis and other relevant issues on the curriculum. The discussion will focus on clarification and summary questions. Specific problems (e.g. minor case studies) might serve as a starting point for further discussion. Possible preparation time for the oral diploma examination may be granted. The records of the examination shall only contain the overall grade (distinction, merit, pass, fail), not any partial assessment. The overall grade can be reached via a points system or a grading system. Information regarding this process shall be included in the records of the examination. The standard form valid for all degree programmes of the UAS bfi Vienna will be used for recording the examination process. Further details regarding the content and procedure of the oral diploma examination will be announced by those responsible for the respective degree programmes.
The examination senate under the leadership of the chairperson will assess the examination (overall grade) immediately after the oral diploma examination. Neither the examination candidates nor any other listeners will be present during the examination senate's consultation regarding the assessment of the exam. Records of the oral examinations must be documented. This enclosed addendum to the record of results contains a summary of the questions asked as well as the assessed answers. The respective examination senate shall announce the result of the oral diploma examination to the student immediately upon determination of the grade. The chairperson is responsible for the records of the session and thus also for the coordinated joint assessment of the oral examination. The records must be duly signed by the members of the examination senate. Resit examination A failed diploma examination before the committee can be repeated no more than twice. To calculate the overall assessment (grade) of the final examination, the four sections of the exam will be weighted as follows: master thesis 40%; presentation and defence of the thesis 10%; discussion about subjects related to the thesis special field 1 25%, discussion about other relevant subjects on the curriculum special field 2 25% The diploma examination before the committee will be graded "Fail" if the candidate fails at least one section of the exam. The resit examination is always a general examination, for which there is only one overall grade. If the diploma examination is graded "Fail", the exam has to be retaken in its entirety. Resit examinations will if possible take place before the same examination senate as the first examination. Failure to report for an exam without a sufficient explanation will result in the grade "Fail".
1st example Distinction 2nd example Merit 3rd example Pass 4th example Fail
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.175
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.5
1.70
2.0
2.0
2.5
3.0
2.375
2.0
2.0
2.5
5.0
Fail (2.875)
The respective grade (partial and overall assessment) will be calculated by the committee under the leadership of the chairperson.
Y:\ARIMA\Studienbetrieb\Richtlinien\guidelines master's degree 2011 english 25 1 2011.doc
Example of the application of the above grading scale Pass with distinction: The master thesis must be assessed as 1.0 or 1.5 The average grade must be equal to or better than 1.5 No grade must be worse than 2.0 Pass with merit: The master thesis must be assessed as no worse than 2.0 The average grade must be 2.0 max. No grade must be worse than 2.5 Pass: Other positive assessment (no distinction or merit)