Sie sind auf Seite 1von 12

1 INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE FOR THIS COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER

2 3 4

DEFENDANT IS A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT UNDER SECTION 391 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE."

5 6 7

21.

Attorney Mercado and paz are not "fully" disclosing to this Court that all my legal

problems started when Attorney Mercado first appear to testily at my trial in Pasadena in case GO 039459, as my brother Jesus was suing me for millions that purportedly I had stolen from the Estate of my brother Luis, and based on this information given by Attorney Mercado that I had the millions hidden somewhere? This Judicial set up, and lie was told to Attorneys Pratt,

8
9

Conway, and Counts as they engineered these proceedings to continue as they attempted to get
10

me to pay exorbitant Attorneys fees and were angry at me for not telling them I was worth

11
12

millions. Attorney Conway was already saying after I lost my case, which was his fault; he would do an Appeal that would cost me well over $50,000.00 for me. This proves Attorney Conway thought I was worth millions! But I was Not!

13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20

22.

Attorneys Mercado and Paz must admit that If Attorney Mercado had not shown up at a

trial where her testimony was instantly contradicted by the facts, and that Plaintiff learned WHERE my mother, Pelicitas Castaneda "invested" $100,000.00 ofthe settlement money! The

"I NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH HOW MRS. CASTANEDA SPENT HER SETTLEMENT MONEY. HAD NO INVOL VEMENT WITH WHERE SHE INVESTED IT. OR WHAT SHE DID WITH IT."1.AND the Court of Appeals "AFTER DISBURSEMENT. MERCADO WENT WITH DEFENDANT'S MOTHER AND SISTER TO THE BANK TO IDENTIFY DEFENDANT'S MOTHER TO THE BANK CLERK AND TO CONFIRM THE VALIDITY OF THE CHECK." WHO IS LYING NOW, BECAUSE BOTH STATEMENTS
CANNOT BE THE TRUTH! Again, it all begins here:

21
22 23 24 25 26

Case Number: GC031549 ABEL BUELNA VS. JOSE SALAZAR CASTANEDA Filing Date: 03/21/2003 Case Type: Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) Status: Dismissed - Other 06/1712005

27
28

Page 13'
VERIFIED COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE PHILLIP HICKOK AND THE CORRUPTION IN COURT

1
2 3
4

23.

After the many inaccurate statements, lies, and now false testimony of Attorney Mercado,

I then posted in the internet the official transcript, as Mercado suffers total amnesia on the stand about where Mercado banks at, and this being the same bank that Mercado took my mother who was her client, to cash settlement check of large sums of money. The reason Attorney Mercado was lying is because at the time Mercado took my mother to Mercado's bank, the settlement check "WAS DEVERTED" in an "investment" that was made with monies from the settlement i

5
6 7

1997. Felicitas Castaneda forgot about the investment thinking it was a saving account, and an inquiry started after the false testimony and lies of Attorney Mercado started to come up about the missing funds from my mother's account as Mercado's bank. The question is: how can an 85

8
9

year old senior citizen, slowly dying of cancer, under heavy medication, that spoke "NO"
10

English, with a second grade education and Mrs. Castaneda was able to "managed" an investment, in Spanish, with a second grade educational level, over the telephone as claimed, manage over in 8 different telephonic withdrawals? How many 85 year old senior citizens are able to manage or to make over several telephonic withdrawals in Spanish without an interpreter? This is how the theft continued for years!

11
12

13
14 15 16

24.

I was accused of stealing Millions, How can it be my fault, especially if a Conspiracy was

17
18 19 20 21

done by my own Attorney, and if my own attorney Jack K. Conway, Paz, Mercado, MacCarley, Counts, conspire to make me lose my case, by "WITHHOLDING" my evidence or stopping my case by without ANY evidence to be presented to the court. For proof, who comes to court without one piece of evidence at the day of my trial? And the Judge allowed this? Does this make any sense? Then as all parties speculated, made up stories, which was never proven? Nothing was ever confirmed, verified, or certified because it was all lies !!! And again, the court

22

allowed this? For Proof see the Court Minutes for 3/22/2010, as the Court lies by stating in the
23 24
25 26 27 28

Court minutes: '~TudI!ment will be siI!ned and issued when the Court has an ovvortunitv to review the forms for comvleteness and correctness. " For Proof that the Court is selling their decisions, where is the Proof of Service on all 10 documents filed by Attorneys Paz and Mercado as they requested the Entry of Default! This is how you know it was a set up and a Purchased Decision based on a Bribe to the Court; And Judge Rita Miller signed the Judgment without even checking up on the Attorneys lies! In fact, she allows the lies! That is how I knew I was set up!

I VERIFIED

COMPLAINT

AGAINST JUDGE PHILLIP

HICKOK AND THE CORRUPTION

IN COURT

Page 1~!

1
2
3

Why come to court if you are already guilty, and set up to lose! If I am Lying, where are the 6 million dollars?

IV.

THE SERIES OF QUESTIONS BEFORE THIS COURT THAT NEEDS TO

5
6

BE ADDRESSED IN THE NAME OF JUSTICE, ARE AS FOLLOWS:

7 8

25.

Why, and can Commissioner Drewry hire an Attorney for me, without my permission, an

hire Attorney Ivan Shomer to come into his Courtroom on January 13, 2009, in Dept. 76, to represent me, and without an MC-50, as required by law in Case BS 118244. And then, why
9

would the Judge allow Attorney Shomer requests a "continuance" on my behalf, when I never
10

agreed to the Continuance, or paid any money for Attorney Shomer for his services? Can a Judge hire an Attorney for me and without my permission when he sabotaged my case to lose? To prove this is the truth, IT was a "Judicial Conflict of Interest" for the Judge to hire an Attorney for me, and then to lose my case in same court that hired my Attorney for me! For proof, the Judge paid the Attorney to represent me! To verify my claims, complaint, and charges, I never paid Ivan Shomer for his services; the Court did when the court hired him for the Predictive and Purchased decision! This action violates my rights, but it is criminal in nature! The continuance was granted "on the condition" that the TRO be granted. How can you get a TRO, if a Restraining Order was never requested at the time while in court? And for what? What was the TRO based on if the Police was "NEVER" called? For proof, TRO are not heard in this Courtroom, and without a valid Application or form! This proves Attorney Shomer was not my Attorney, he thought he was there for a TRO! Also, Why would Commissioner Drewry allow

11
12

13
14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21

officers of the Court to state less than the truth on Court Transcripts? Also, a Spontaneous
22

Statement was made in court, and on court records to prove the Attorney was hired for me! "HE,
23
24 25 26

FORCED OUR HAND. WE JUST DID WHAT WE HAD TO DO TO GET THIS ORDER" How much did Attorney Paz paid the court for the Injunction with false statements and a series 0 illegal series of Judicial Acts. For proof, Where is the MC-50 Shomer was suppose to supply the court! This proves the Judge hired him and why there was NO MC-50 form for representation! There was "Never" or no immediate or present danger, because Law Enforcement was never used or even called. So how can you get a Restraining Order, without a criminal Act or any

27
28

\ \ !!!V!!!E!!!RI!!!P!!!IE!!!D!!!C!!!O!!!M!!!P!!!LA!!!I!!!N!!!T!!!A!!!G!!!A!!!I

N!!!S!!!T!!!JU!!!D!!!G!!!E!!!P!!!H!!!IL!!!L!!!I

P!!!!!H!!!!!I!!!!!C!!!!!KO!!!!!K!!!!!A!!!!!N!!!!!D!!!!!!!!!!TH!!!!!E!!!!!C!!O!!R!!R!!U!!P!!TI!!O!!N!!!!!I!!!!!!!!!!NC!!OU!!!!!R!!T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!pa!!!!!g!!e!!!!!!!!!lS\!

1
2

incidents of abuse? For Proof, Attorney Mr. Paz will provide the court the dates of the "numerous times" Plaintiff appear at his office! The only dangerous people are attorneys practing law in dirty court oflaw! Attorneys Paz, Conway, MacCarley, Counts, Shomer, Sigoghosian using the court as a "Tool" or an "Instrument" to steal from the People of California, by using, manipulating the proceedings, and making false allegations, stories, and lies that are never confIrmed or verifIed by the court, and the best liar win their cases! And without "ANY" Evidence, Just lies! !!

3 4 5
6

7 8

26.
9

Why would Judge Rita Miller grant an Entry of Default in a Free Speech case based on

Judicial lies? For proof, the Judge Rita Miller never confirmed, verified, or even had an
10

evidentiary hearing to fInd out who was telling the truth, or who was lying; and never cared, because she got her "CUT" of the bribe money. On Attorney Mercado Declaration, on fIle and in court records, more lies are submitted to the court and / or Attorney Conway testimony of May 8, 2009 was allowed to stand? Why? This action that was less than the truth and caused Judge Rita Miller to Place Attorney Conway under oath on May 8, 2009, to get his stories straight! Which liar is telling the truth, Attorney Mercado or Conway, when their stories conflict or do not match up because they lie in court? These Attorneys were lying, or why would the Judge place the Attorneys under oath for lying in her court? For proof, the Court never checked for the "Completeness" or "Accurateness" in entry of default forms. There is one law for attorneys and another for the People of California! And another law for Judges who accept Bribes! For proof, Sentencing Guidelines, Case Law, or Stare Decises are never followed!

11
12
13

14
15 16

17 18 19 20 21

27.
22 23

Why would Judge Joseph F. DeVanon OBSTRUCTS, REFUSES, that an attorney that I

hired and paid, not represent me in a related case as MacCarley lies, lies, and tells the court more lies to win her case. For proof, why wasn't anything certified, verified, or even confrrmed? Why
24 25 26 27 28

would Judge DeVanon attempt to enforce C.C.P. 284 & 285 on February 22,2010 in a related case with Attorney Lisa Marie MacCarley as the attorney of record? Because it is the law! And yet, the MC-50 was on file! Judge DeVanon lied, or was just flat out WRONG to violate my Civil Rights to Due Process. If the Supreme Court Reviews the "uniformity" of the law was being applied in the State of California Courtrooms, then where is the MC-50 filed in the
VERIFIED COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE PHILLIP HICKOK AND THE CORRUPTION IN COURT

Page 1

1
2
3 4

Mercado v. Castaneda cases? If the court presided by Judge DeVanon did not recognized and claimed in open court that "Counts did not contact the Court", when in fact, an MC-50 was filed; then it proves that Judge DeVanon is the liar too! Once I started to complain, state, show, and display the many lies in a court of law without any evidence to support the lies and storytelling, the court and the Attorneys started to apply a "NEW" Judicial Tactic of Character Assignation to shut me up! Because of this Formal Complaint displaying the court and the corruption of selling decisions, they conspire to attack my good name, to hide their crimes and shortcomings.

5
6 7

V.
8
9

PLAINTIFF REQUEST THAT COURT TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE MATTERS THAT SHOW, PROVE, AND DISPLAY OF A LARGER CIVIL RIGHTS, BUT THE

FOLLOWING
10

CONSPIRACY BY DEFENDANTS TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S SELLING OF DECISIONS:


11
12 13

28. Under California Evidence Code section [451/452] to be noticed and the many reasons this court should take judicial notice of each in numbered paragraphs of Exhibits "A" through Exhibit A is the Declaration of Attorney Sonia Maria Mercado with the following statement on

14
15 16 17

Page 1, Line 15: "APPARENTLY LUIS HAD LEFT MILLIONS IN HIS ESTATE FROM AN

ANNUITY FROM A PREVIOUS ACCIDENT WHICH LEFT HIM MENTALLY DISABLED. " This Court must and should take further notice that Sonia Mercado also accused
18

me of "depleating"
19 20 21 22

all the funds from the Estate of Luis Castaneda to hide her involvement in her

theft. I fIrmly believe, and I am now convinced that this was the reason my brothers sued me in 2003. When Attorney Mercado appeared to testify, I was not aware that Mercado had taken my mother to the bank where Attorney Mercado has her personal checking and Trust Account. This was a "Conflict of Interest" and Attorney Mercado's lies at trial ruined my life to cover her crime

23 24
25

of theft. After Plaintiff posted on a Y ouTube the testimony of Attorney Mercado, she filed a complaint against me on or around November 2008 "In Concert" which makes it a Conspiracy with Lisa Marie MacCarley as she also filed a case on January of 2009 against me. I never had an opportunity to present "any" proof to prove I have been telling the truth all along. You can't, when a Bribe is paid to the Court!

26
27

28

VERIFIED

COMPLAINT

AGAINST JUDGE PHILLIP

HICKOK AND THE CORRUPTION

IN COURT

Page 1'j

1
2

Exhibit B is a Letter from the Law Offices of Jack K. Conway sent to the Commission on Judicial Performance dated May 21, 2010. On the second Paragraph Mr. Conway admits and confesses: "IN ERROR I DID NOT REAliZE THAT THERE WERE TWO SEPARATE

3 4

ACTIONS AND A DEFAULT HAD BEEN ENTERED AGAINST MR. CASTANEDA FOR FAILURE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO THE COMPLAINT. " Mr. Conway

5
6 7

had previously lied on May 8, 2009 to have the default set aside. Why did Judge Rita Miller placed Jack Conway under oath at that hearing, and not place Sonia Mercado to confirm who was lying for that the Errata Declaration of Sonia Mercado "WHICH" instantly contradicted Attorney Mr. Conway? Mr. Conway was present in the Pasadena court in case GP 013952, when I was served with lawsuit by Mercado's secretary, Mr. Arroyo. This point is important! If I was served in front of my Attorney, he can verify this fact! Exhibit C is the Notice, Demand, Motion for a Judicial Notice of Evidence found on appeal for case Jose Castaneda v. Mercado before the Second Appellate District of California, case No. B 223549. This filing was also in Opposition to Mercado's false, libelous, slanderous request for

8
9 10

11
12

13
14

Vexatious litigant. How can I be responsible for all these cases that have been filed or had to be
15

file to defend myself of having stolen millions from my mother's Estate. For proof, when
16 17 18 19 20

Conway learned that I was worth millions, as he now then "intentionally" set me up to lose my simple court case so that he could collect additional fees by doing my Appeal? For proof, Mr. Conway had to leave the courtroom on February 4,2009, as he was going to a case that he also had in the court of appeals. ON Exhibit D is the (Proposed) Order granting Appelle's Motion to dismiss the Appeal and to

21

find Jose Castaneda Vexatious Litigant. Be advised, the Court of Appeals denied both request by
22 23
24 25 26

Appelle! Plaintiff is requesting and even "Demanding" an Evidentiary Hearing and sanctions against Attorney Mercado and Paz and any other Defendant (e.g. MacCarley, and Counts) that raises the issue of Plaintiff being a vexatious litigant. How can I be responsible for things other people have done in my name, which other Attorneys have filed in court for me or on my behalf? I have spent well over $50,000.00 since 2003 defending myself to false claims, statements, and speeches made in and out of the courthouse. This is Nuts! !!

27

\~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!II!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~

VERIFIED

COMPLAINT

AGAINST JUDGE PHILLIP

HICKOK AND THE CORRUPTION

IN COURT

Page 1

1
2 3
4

On Exhibit E is the Request for "Judicial Notice" of a Judicial Scam & Fraud exhibit as Decl. "ERRATA" of Attorney Sonia M. Mercado. Be advised, when Judge Rita Miller read this declaration, it cause the Court to place Mr. Conway under oath and under penalty of perjury to try and get to the truth. Did both attorneys lied and the Court did not diligently pursue or attempt to hold the liars accountable! As a result of the lie, the Entry of Default was set aside! And on a lie which the court allows! For proof, nothing is certified, verified, or even confirmed! Never! So the judicial lies continue to fly in court! I now understand the statement by Conway telling me: "I CAN MAKE THIS CASE GO A WAY FOR YOU. YOU FORGET ABOUT THEM. AND

5
6

7 8

THEY IN TURN FORGET ABOUT YOU" Will Attorney Paz and Conway disclose to the Court
9

the conversation that took place for about 45 minutes outside the court on May 8, 2008, were
10

they were rehearing and rehearsing the lies they were going to tell the court? I personally overheard Paz say: "DO YOU THINK JOSE WANTS TO SETTLE THIS?" On Exhibit F is the Declaration of Susana Castaneda, a declaration made up, fabricated by Attorney Lisa Marie MacCarley to an event that only took place in the mind, as she lies again.

11
12

13
14

For proof, first, my sister Susana Castaneda did not visit Felicitas Castaneda at hospital on
15

January 4,2008 because Felicitas Castaneda was not in a hospital bed on that specific day.
16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Attorney MacCarley could NOT even get her lie straight! Second, the hospital records do not show or reflect any hospitalizations made for January 4, 2008. Third, Felicitas Castaneda was executing her Last Will and Testament on January 4,2008, in Los Angeles. Fourth, Felicitas Castaneda Last Will and Testament has been admitted in Probate Case GP 013952, Fifth, to prove this Declaration of Susan Castaneda was a lie, there are no phone records of any telephone calls on January
4th

2008, between Attorney Sonia Mercado or Susana Castaneda and SIXTH,

see the Contract agreement with Attorney Jack K. Conway of January 4, 2008!!! I stopped by the offices of Jack Conway, signed the Contract with Attorney Conway, left a check, and my mother and sister were waiting in the car at the same time. See the date of the check to prove

23 24
25 26

I was there!

On Exhibit G is the "agreement" of February 2, 2009 that was signed by all 3 attorneys without informing me, Jose Castaneda. For proof, Plaintiff will submit the Reporter's Transcript of a Hearing held on February 4, 2009. In it, the hearing, the comment by Judge Drewry, telling me to

21 28

'd

"Defer it to yourself or to your attorney" shows the true colors of the court to suppress eVl ence.
\ \

1
2

This was rude, and displays Corruption to listen to relevant testimony! Not letting me testify, and to not let the whole truth in court displays the steering of the case to an Engineered and Purchased decision from the court based on a judicial bribe! For proof, If I defer it to myself, the relevant facts, information, or evidence that was "withheld" from the court and court record, and now the Court can claim they did not know, and that I should have notified the court. How? HOWl if the Judge order me to defer it to myself? Because I was not allowed to testify, clarify, or correct a possible errors, and put the truth on record, or only half or partial truth on court record, because I had to defer it to myself? Does this make any sense? Does this sound like an honest

3
4

5
6 7

court, when I have to refer relevant information and facts to myself, instead of the court to get an
9

honest Verdict or decision? It is impossible to lie; It's even on Court Record! !!


10

11
12

On Exhibit H is the Declaration of Attorney Sonia Mercado filed in Probate Case GP 013952. Be advised, on court record, Page 2, Item 3, Lines 24 to 25 contain the following false statement:

13
14

"I NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH HOW MRS. CASTANEDA SPENT HER SETTLEMENT MONEY. HAD NO INVOLVEMENT WITH WHERE SHE INVESTED OR WHAT SHE DID WITH IT. " THIS IS A LIE; AND IT IS ON COURT RECORD!!!

15
16

How can an Attorney be so "Stupid" to claim "No Involvement", when the Dumb Ass Attorney takes a client to her own bank!!! This was a "Conflict of Interest"! Be advised, CHASE financial investment agents Christian Holt, Paul Vega, Leonard "Lenny" Gzesh, and Katharine Kanitra have denied any involvement into the HOW, the WHERE, and the WHAT the $113,626.25 dollars that went in an investment from settlement? The question before this court is WHO assisted Mrs. Castaneda with this "investment" made at Mercado's own bank, which she claims

17
18 19 20 21

has nothing to do with the investment made at her own bank? Where she took my mother to steal
22 23 24
12/03/2008 Declaration - Probate (OF ATTY SONIA MERCADO, ESQ. ) 25 26 Filed by Attorney for Claimant

more money? If Attorney Mercado claims she had nothing to do with my mother's money ... on Mercado's Declaration filed in Probate Case GP 013952, and in addition there are millions:

If Luis Castaneda "left millions in his Estate", where are they? At Attomey Mercado's Bank,
27

that has nothing to do with my mother's money at her own bank? I, as well as my brothers would
28

\ !!V!!!!E!!!!R!!!!IF!!!!IE!!!!D!!!!C!!!!O!!!!M!!!!P!!!!L!!!!A!!!!IN!!!!T!!!!A!!!!G!!!!A!!!!I N!!!!S!!!!T!!!!lU!!!!D!!!!G!!!!E!!!!P!!!!H!!!!IL!!!!L!!!lp!!!!!!Hl!!!C!!!K!!!O!!!K!!!A!!!N!!!D!!!T!!!H!!!E

!!!C!!! OR!!!R!!!U!!!P!!!T!!!1

O!!!N!!!I!!!N!!!C!!!O!!!U!!!RT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!p!!!ag!!!e!!!!!!!2

~!

1
2
3
4

like to know! This is the reason my life has been ruined since 2005! Where are the god dam millions you claimed there were? What did you do with the money! Again, it's impossible to lie, it's on court records! Exhibit I is the Request for Questions for Attorney Samuel R. Paz. Again, I lost by Default because even my own attorney "lost" my fIle after I fired him for lying to the Court. To prove I was set up, Conway was first hired on January 4,2008 for the cases GC 039459, and GC 039473. In fact, Conway was present when I was served with the case BC 402096, in Department A of the courthouse. Again, the lying testimony of Conway of May 8, 2009; and now the ERRATA Declaration of Attorney Sonia Mercado do give anyone a good laugh, as to who the best liar is! On Exhibit

5 6 7

8
9

10

J, a letter to Captain

Oceal Victory from the Sheriff Department in response

11
12
13

to a false, criminal in nature, complaint by Attorney Samuel R. Paz, as he uses the Marina Del Rey Sheriff's Department as a "Tool" or an "Instrument" to intimidate and harass Plaintiff. Attorney Mr. Paz falsely claims to have a TRO or Court Order against Plaintiff. It is another judicial lie! In fact, Attorney Paz should disclose to this Court of record HOW this TRO was "Forced" on Plaintiff! The TRO was fake; also I never had a chance to have an honest hearing as

14 15

I was present at my own Lynching! In fact, one incident that comes to mind is that, on February
16

4,2008, as I stepped outside the Courtroom to discuss my case with Attorney Conway, who had
17

already signed the Stipulation on February 2, 2009 without my knowledge or consent! My sister Alicia remained inside the Courtroom and observed Attorney Paz making gestures, circling his hand around his ear, to the Commissioner Drewry, that I was crazy! Non-Verbal Cues or signs are used as "Code" to throw cases based on a judicial bribe! Why come to court, if the decisions are already bought and sold!!! I now understand the comment by Commissioner Drewry, "defer
it to yourself.."

18
19

20 21 22 23 24 25

He already made a deal for his "cut" of the bribe that he accepted!

On Exhibit K is the Court Minutes for case BC 402096 with the statement: "JUDGMENT WILL BE SIGNED AND ISSUED WHEN THE COURT HAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO

REVIEW THE FORMS FOR COMPLETENESS AND CORRECTNESS" , and the Fax Cover
26

Sheet dated February 3, 2009 from Attorney Samuel R. Paz. First, if the Court had protected my
27

Rights to Due Process, it would have held Attorney Conway responsible for sabotaging my case
28

to lose, as I was set up to lose, so he could do my Appeal. This also proves Conway lied. How
VERIFIED COMPLAINT

Page
AGAINST lUDGE PHILLIP HICKOK AND THE CORRUPTION IN COURT

211

1
2

can I hired Mr. Conway on "February 2,3", as Conway testified in court, and then Attorney Conway "agrees" to settle my case on the same "EXACT" day I hired him? This is impossible! See the dates on the legal documents for proof! Also, how can 3 attorneys be making a deal at the same place, at the same "exact" time and with the "same exact" pen signing a Stipulation that contained false allegations or accusations! The court Transcript of February 4, 2008, shows displays, and proves that I have consistently been telling the truth to this Court. Don't I deserve my day in court to find out where the millions went!

3
4

5
6 7

On Exhibit L Plaintiff further requests, and moves this court to take "Judicial Notice" of the
9

following two statements found in Transcript by Attorney Jack K. Conway as he states in court
10

and lies to the court: "I WAS RETAINED ON FEBRUARY 2.3. YOUR HONOR"; by Attorney Samuel R. Paz, he then states in court: "HE FORCED OUR HAND. WE JUST DID WHAT

11
12

WE HAD TO DO TO GET THIS ORDER"; by Attorney Robert Berke in court states on court
record the following: "THERE'S NO REASON TO DISPUTE THE FACTS BECAUSE FOR THIS INJUNCTION TO RESOLVE WE'RE JUST GOING TO REMOVE WHAT THERE IS. AND THEN WITH RESPECT TO THE DISPUTED FACTS. IT'S NOT NECESSARY THAT ISSUE. SO WE SA VE A LOT OF COURT TIME. WE SA VE A LOT OF GRIEF. WE

13
14 15
16

17
18 19 20

GET THIS CORRECTED AND WE MOVE ON. These statements are on the Court's record as
of May 8, 2009, April 13, 2009, and February 4, 2009. It begins by a series lies by Attorney Conway, then supported by Paz's truthfulness as to how he obtains a TRO with fake or false evidence, and Attorney Berke, the great Civil Rights leader denying me my right to share with the general public, the testimony of Attorney Sonia Mercado at my trial! On Exhibit M is the November 2, 2011 Resubmission of Request for FINRA, or Financial

21
22 23 24

Industry Regulatory Authority of Submitted Exhibits by Chase Investment Services Corporation listed as CISC 0227, 0228, 0229, and 0230. The signature inside the Transfer Withdrawal Slip in all four is not my mother, and it is a forgery that CHASE has refused to acknowledge for Mercado and Attorney MacCarley because they probably signed it or forged my mother's signature.

25
26

27
28

VERWlt.U C.OM?l..A.\N'I A.GAINS'I )\JUGf. P\\lU .P HICKOK AND tHE CORRUPtlON IN COURT \
\

1
2

1129.

IN CONCLUSION AND Based on the ALL of the above statements, it is respectfully requested

WHEREFORE,

3
4

that the Presiding Judge Smalley overturn the Vexatious Litigant Order of March 28, 2012, that was based on a bribe and not based on true or real evidence to label Plaintiff Vexatious Litigant and impose sanctions. Please use common sense this time! If the Appeals already ruled that I was NOT a Vexatious Litigant, can the "Lower" Court Supersede the Higher Court's Decision? The answer is Yes, if a Judicial Bribe was paid to the court! To prove it was a Bribe, a lower Court

5
6 7

"CANNOT" overrule a Higher Court's Decision! This is not ONLY illegal, But to prove Bribery
8

that a court will Supersede its Authority, Power, and Office if the PRICE IS RIGHT!!!
9

In Addition, Plaintiff motions the court for a Summary Judgment of undisputed facts or false statements made by Officers of the Court to win their case. Requesting Punitive, Pain and Suffering damages or award as required by law. I swear under the Penalty of Perjury that Everything is true and correct to the best of my Knowledge. ~se

10

11
12

13
14

.798[~~ Castaneda

16

17 18
19

VERIFICA TION
I certify that the above information is true and correct and that I have not misrepresented any of the Statements of facts in this legal document to the best of my knowledge.

20 21
22

~~~ Castan:Ka~' ose

-.

Self Represented
23 24 25 26 27
28

\ \!!V!!!E!!!R!!!lF!!!l!!!ED!!!!!!C!!!O!!!M!!!P!!!LA!!!l!!!N!!!T!!!A!!!G!!A!!1

N!!S!!T!!l!!U!!D!!G!!E!!P!!!!!H!!IL!!L!!lp!!!!!!!!!!H!!l

C!!K!!O!!K!!A!!N!!D!!T!!!!!H!!E!!!!C!!

OR!!R!!U!!P!!!!!T!!!!!I!!!!!O N!!!!IN!!!!!!!!!!C!!O!!!!! UR:!!!!!T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!pa!!!!!g!!!!!e!!!!!Z-3\

1
2

PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

3
4

BC

Castaneda v. Phillip H. Hickok

5
6 7

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my mailing address is 2849 W. Rome Avenue, Anaheim, California 92804. On May ,2012 I served the foregoing documents described as:

PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE HICKOK FOR VEXATIOUS LITIGANT ORDER WITHOUT EVIDENCE AND ALLOWING FALSE EVIDENCE BASED ON A BRIBE
On the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid in the United States mail at Pasadena, California, addressed as follows:
Sarah Overton Esq.
Cummings McClorey Davis & Acho 3801 University Ave Ste 560 Riverside, CA 92501

8
9 10

11
12 13

Lisa Marie MacCarley Esq.


3436 N. Verdugo Rd. Glendale, CA 91208

Emahn Counts Esq.


70 S. Lake Avenue Pasadena, CA 9110 I

# 100

14
15 16

Justice System Integrity Division Jan Maurizi, Director


210 West Temple St., 18th Floor Los Angeles, CA. 90012 Phone: (213) 974-3888

Sam Paz/Sonia Mercado


5701 W. Slauson Ave, Ste 202 Culver City, CA 90230

Jack K. Conway Esq.


2460 Huntington Dri ve San Marino, CA 91108

David A. Xavier Esq.


17
18 19 20 401 S. Mission Dr. San Gabriel, CA 91776

Susana CastanedalRamirez
1440 17th Street Los Osos, CA 93402

Stephen R. Rykoff
11355 W. Olympic Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90064

I am readily familiar with the practice of the collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service; such enve1ope(s) will be deposited with the United States Postal Service on the above date in the ordinary course at the address shown above; and such envelope was placed for collection and mailing on the above date according to ordinary mailing practices. Executed on May 13, 2012, at Pasadena, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct .. Dated: May 13, 2012 ~ JaNnesBlume, USMC, HONORABLE
V

21 22
23

24
25

26
27 28

\~.

~~C\JSMC

~tJ~~frtlt)

VERIFIED

COMPLAINT

AGAINST JUDGE PHILLIP

HICKOK AND THE CORRUPTION

IN COURT

Page 2

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen