Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Identify the topics to be measured based on the information needs Order the topics in a sequence that will be meaningful to the respondents Draft sample questions and compose typical scales for each topic area Organise the items into sections in a logical sequence Compose a rough questionnaire draft outline to serve as a model
FOCUS Every question on a questionnaire should focus directly on a single specific issue or topic BREVITY Short questions are less subject to error on the part of both interviewer and respondent CLARITY Demands that virtually everyone interprets the question in exactly the same way VOCABULARY Use words in the core vocabulary of virtually all respondents and limit vocabulary to words the least sophisticated respondent will know GRAMMAR Use simple sentences and change long, dependent clauses to short phrases where possible
Multiple-Choice Question
Single Response Please indicate your voting intentions _ The Conversation Party _ The Favour Party _ The Literal-Demagogue Party
Multiple Response Please check ANY brand of washing powder that youve tried _ Superclean _ Ultrasteril
Likert Scale
For each statement, please pick a number from the scale to show how much you agree or disagree and jot it in the space in front of the item SCALE 1 = Strongly Agree 2 = Agree 3 = Neutral 4 = Disagree 5 = Strongly Disagree
_ Air Pollution is a serious problem in this community _ British producers of eucalyptus-flavoured dog biscuits have benefited from EU membership 5
Reliable Safe 7
___:___:___:___:___:____: Unreliable
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6
___:___:___:___:___:____: Dangerous
to to to to to to
obtain a measurement infer a result about the population make a comparison prove a change has taken place show an association between things demonstrate a causal connection
nominal
Two
Three or more 9
Level of measurement
One-way ANOVA
nominal
Two
Cochrans Q test
Friedmans two-way ANOVA
Three or more 10
Level of measurement
Discriminant Analysis
interval / ratio
Numerous dissertations just collect data Marketing must develop and test theories Theory is how researchers choose to organize their knowledge Theory must guide your research Logical steps are not always logical
12
Nature of measurement
What do we want to measure? Concept: abstractions formed from observation Construct: concepts that have been invented for scientific purposes Think about the construct of brand loyalty Conceptual definition defines a concept in term of other concepts; aims to capture the key idea of the concept Operational definition aims to translate the concept into observable events by specifying what must be done
13
Data sets become your best friend You are the only expert on your topic A good researcher can always use the data Think about the results before you collect the data
14
Levels of significance: 0.10, 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 Most common 0.05 (default in SPSS) p=0.05 Null hypothesis is rejected: smaller than 0.05 e.g. Sig. 0.000, 0.02, 0.002 or 0.007 Null hypothesis is accepted: more than 0.05 e.g. Sig. 0.95 or 0.20
15
To Compare groups (nominal data) use ChiSquare Use Chi-Square in the Crosstabs procedure Cell frequencies must be more than 5 >Analyze > Descriptive Statistics > Crosstabs
16
Chi-Square
Example: null hypothesis: There is no difference between men and women in relation to family status men women Married 13% 41% single 36% 22% Divorced 51% 37% Significance 0.000
Null hypothesis is rejected. There is a difference between men and women (Sig. 0.000)
17
Chi-Square
Example: null hypothesis: There is no difference between normal scheme members and club 500 members in relation to their family status
Null hypothesis is rejected. There is a difference between normal scheme members and club 500 members (Sig. 0.000)
18
19
t-Test
Example: null hypothesis: There is no difference between normal scheme members and club 500 members in importance of Foodcentres
Null hypothesis is rejected. There is a difference between normal scheme members and club 500 members in importance of Foodcentres (Sig. 0.000)
20
Example: null hypothesis: There is no difference between different age groups in terms of fairness
Null hypothesis is rejected. There is a difference between different age groups in terms of fairness (Sig. 0.000) 21