Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
WHAT
IS
SUSTAINABLE?
We
hear
the
phrases,
sustainable
and
green
used
often,
but
what
does
it
mean
to
be
sustainable
and
what
are
green
principles?
For
the
sake
of
this
thesis,
I
have
defined
sustainability
as
the
ability
to
sustain
or
maintain
development
without
compromising
resources
for
future
generations
for
the
sake
of
short-term
gains.
Through
this
research
lead
design
thesis
I
will
describe
how
a
green
economy
could
rejuvenate
the
city
of
Christchurch
and
at
the
same
time
dispel
the
common
perception
that
economics
and
sustainability
are
mutually
incompatible.
Investing
in
a
green
economy
is
a
viable
catalyst
for
regeneration
for
Christchurch
because:
-
Firstly
because
New
Zealand
claims
to
be
clean
and
green
and
particularly
the
South
Island
which
is
known
for
its
beautiful
scenic
natural
environments.
Further,
Christchurchs
identity
is
the
Garden
City,
which
if
taken
seriously
could
be
the
impetus
behind
promoting
a
green
economy.
-
Secondly,
with
the
impending
global
energy
crisis,
the
age
of
cheap
energy
is
over.
Because
we
have
passed
peak
oil,
we
need
to
start
planning
how
to
supply
our
growing
energy
demands
with
renewable
sources.
-
Which
leads
me
to
my
third
point,
Christchurch
is
fortunate
with
an
abundance
of
water,
long
solar
hours,
and
arable
land.
The
geographic
location
of
Christchurch
is
positioned
well
to
take
advantage
of
its
natural
resources
and
create
a
sustainable
energy
strategy
to
support
the
city.
-
And
lastly,
the
size
of
Christchurch
makes
it
a
perfect
candidate
to
be
a
prototype
city
to
test
a
holistic
energy
strategy.
Christchurch
has
a
population
of
approximately
370,000
inhabitants;
which
makes
it
large
enough
to
be
relevant
as
a
major
city
centre
but
also
small
enough
for
technology
and
infrastructure
to
be
implemented
quickly
and
efficiently.
The
speed
of
adoption
and
evaluation
can
be
analysed
a
lot
faster
in
Christchurch
compared
to
a
large
metropolitan
city,
where
various
governing
bodies
may
impede
such
a
progress.
ENERGY
At
the
heart
of
a
green
economy
is
energy
use.
In
Christchurch,
electricity
comes
mainly
from
renewable
sources,
particularly
the
hydro
electricity
dams
in
Benmore,
Manapouri,
and
Clyde.
(EECA
n.d.)
The
energy
produced
from
these
hydroelectric
dams
is
then
feed
into
a
centralized
grid
and
distributed
across
the
country.
A
centralized
power
grid
is
vulnerable
to
failure
due
to
unforeseen
circumstances,
which
can
leave
large
areas
without
power.
The
reason
being
is
that
it
only
takes
one
of
the
connections
into
the
main
grid
to
fail
to
leave
an
entire
city
without
power.
Such
was
the
case
following
the
February
2011
earthquakes,
as
was
made
evident
in
the
increased
amount
of
diesel
usage
as
a
back-up
source
for
power.
(Christchurch
Agency
for
Energy
2012)
Zhi Jian (David) Wong 021 115 7897 Diesel and Petrol is a fossil fuel that powers the Internal Combustion Engine (I.C.E) of our cars in which these land transportation fuels is a majority of 60% of the citys total energy demand. The result of using these fossil fuels as a source of energy contributes to the air pollution in Christchurch; which is costing the city $168 million per annum. (Spronken-Smith 2002) There are more efficient forms of transportation such as the electric vehicles (EV) in which they run on electricity stored in batteries. The method in which we use our private vehicles can also be improved as above 90% of private car users are single occupants; which leads to inefficiencies and congestion. Another contributing factor to air pollution is the use of domestic log burning fireplaces which often heat homes that lack insulation and therefore demand greater heating loads particularly during the winter months. The unfortunate consequence is increased health costs due to the particulates in the air, which could be minimised substantially through retrofitting buildings and replacing the inefficient log burning fireplaces with more efficient lower emission design. Christchurch has the unique opportunity to rebuild and repair large parts of the city, which if managed appropriately means they could seize this opportunity and invest in upgrading their existing buildings to improve energy efficiency, while building new buildings to be superior in their energy use. For example, by adding ceiling insulation in a pre 1960s house, which typically does not have insulation, a cost to benefit ratio could be 7 times the investment over a 30 year period. In other words the cost of retrofitting this house with insulation would benefit the residents 7 more times than it costs to install the insulation over a period of 30 years. (Beacon Pathway Limited 2009)There is a common perception that the relationship between a buildings economic efficiency and its energy efficiency are mutually exclusive; but the truth is the opposite . In todays technologically advanced systems of construction and building techniques, we are able to design options that can reduce costs because of the savings in energy usage.
INVISIBLE
ECONOMY
Unfortunately
while
the
government
purports
to
be
green,
their
actions
are
often
conflicting
and
they
lack
the
ability
to
support
planning
for
long
term
benefits,
as
is
seen
from
their
recent
commitments
to
start
oil
and
fossil
fuel
exploration
at
the
expense
of
the
natural
environment.
There
are
various
examples
of
what
happens
when
the
government
takes
proprietary
control
over
natural
resources
that
show
their
short
sightedness
and
motivation
is
focused
on
immediate
gains.
An
example
of
this
can
been
seen
in
China
when
they
expanded
their
timber
industry
and
caused
excessive
deforestation,
which
consequently
effected
the
environment.
The
market
price
for
timber
was
only
half
of
what
the
Chinese
had
to
pay
due
to
external
environmental
costs
such
as
desertification
and
loss
of
water
runoff.
(TEEB
The
Economics
of
Ecosystems
and
Biodiversity
2011)
The
reason
why
this
happens
is
largely
due
to
the
fact
that
the
natural
economy
is
an
invisible
one,
by
this
I
mean
the
cost
of
natural
resources
and
their
benefits
beyond
their
commercial
value
are
often
not
calculated
into
their
true
costs.
Unfortunately
when
something
is
given
for
free,
Zhi Jian (David) Wong 021 115 7897 the human mentality tends to make this mean it has no value. Therefore when you try and weight the pros and cons of development at the expense of natural environments, there seems to be no loss of value but only profit to be made. However as described in the previous example, when you actually take into account the invisible economy of ecosystems; the remaining balance is quite different. The people who benefit from such short-term decisions are the few that stand to make a profit; where as it is the majority who will ultimately bear the costs of their actions. The reason policies like these have gone through in the past is because the hidden external costs of such decisions has be blinded by the illusionary great short term gains. Thankfully, this notion of the invisible economy is starting to be more prominent into todays politics. The Green party in New Zealand is strongly opposed to the exploration of fossil fuels and have reported the extreme risks that are related to deep sea drilling. If a major oil spill were to happen it could be a loss of over $20 billion in terms of external costs towards the New Zealand economy; and given recent events and catastrophic oil spills such as the one in the Gulf of Mexico, there is no guarantee to prevent these risks. (Green Party 2011) Given that the total value in terms of future royalties from the potential extraction of oil is only to be approximately $8 Billion (National Party 2011) and given the majority of the profits would go to foreign oil companies, one must ask are the risks worth the gains? The environmental situation is not so different when compared to Chinas example of deforestation, we can see that the external costs and potential risk is clearly more than the short -term benefits. And those that will pay the true costs will be the New Zealand tax payer. Prior to this, New Zealand was on the right track by concentrating on its renewable resources but sadly is now slowly shifting its focus to fossil fuels. Surprisingly, this is at a time when the demand and interest for renewable energy is increasing globally; hence it would seem unwise to stray away from the green agenda.
ECONOMIC
CATALYST
The
sustainable
solution
to
the
ever-increasing
energy
needs
and
a
potentially
very
strong
economic
catalyst
for
Christchurchs
recovery,
could
be
one
in
the
same.
Solar
energy
is
an
unharnessed
potential
in
New
Zealand
with
less
than
1%
contribution
to
the
total
energy
sector.
The
estimated
solar
exposure
is
2,050
hours
annually,
which
is
equivalent
to
1360kWh
per
square
metre,
or
approximately
$360
a
year
of
energy
at
27c
per
kwh.
(Energy
Efficiency
and
Conservation
Authority
2001)
Countries
such
as
Australia
and
Germany
are
successfully
leading
the
way
in
the
implementation
of
solar
power
and
have
proven
solar
energy
is
a
viable
and
promising
source.
Australia
has
similar
solar
conditions
as
New
Zealand
but
has
a
solar
adoption
rate
of
50%
(the
rate
of
which
solar
technology
is
being
implemented
in
new
infrastructure);
whilst
New
Zealand
is
merely
2%.
(B.
Moore
2012)
Australia
is
planning
to
intensify
its
clean
energy
industry
by
striving
to
become
a
zero-carbon
country
by
2020;
to
do
this
they
have
produced
a
ten-year
plan
with
strategic
energy
saving
strategies
implemented
in
stages.
By
capitalising
on
this
natural
source
of
solar
energy,
Christchurch
could
learn
from
other
global
leaders
and
lead
the
way
within
the
Zhi Jian (David) Wong 021 115 7897 New Zealand context. Hence, for part of my thesis I will set out to establish a transitional energy strategy to make Christchurch a zero carbon city by 2035 by using solar energy as one of the economic catalyst in the energy scheme. New Zealand has an advantage over Australia as it is smaller country, which means less output for infrastructural projects. As well the majority of New Zealands energy is already from renewable sources, so if New Zealand wanted to set the same aim to achieve a zero carbon energy strategy, it could do so with less time and investment. Another country leading the green revolution is China, New Zealands second largest trading partner. New Zealand, and specifically Christchurch could take advantage of its good trading relationship with China and be a part of Chinas 10 Trillion Yuan investment plan to grow its clean technology industry by supplying innovative ideas and products to the Chinese market. If Christchurch invested in the technology driving the green energy industries, and lead by example it could becoming a truly green energy city, and potentially a source for producing and distributing both the solutions and the technology behind renewable energy sources. Christchurch is at a cross roads, it can either take the path of a Green Economy which would be ecologically and economically responsible, or continue down the road of Business as Usual which neglects the long term consequences of immediate returns. If Christchurch continues the path of the Business as Usual Scenario, nothing really changes, and a select few gets will become richer, mainly the people who have a share in the non-renewable sector. Energy prices will continue to increase as the supply for fossil fuels will inevitably run out, at which time New Zealand will be forced to import Clean tech from abroad, which by then will have become the norm for energy production and consumption leaving New Zealand to catch up rather then lead the way. This would have a negative consequence on New Zealands image as a clean, green country as well it would lend to the continued degradation of the air quality through pollution which has the related consequences of negative health effects. However, if Christchurch takes the steps towards a Green Economy and focuses on further investing in renewable energy technologies, it could lead the way for New Zealand in choosing a responsible and economically sound future. If Christchurch develops a renewable energy strategy, it could become a prototype city for the rest of New Zealand and the world, and instead of falling behind, it could lead the way. My thesis aims to outline a strategy for how this transition to a green economy is not only possible, but could be the catalyst for investment and future growth. I believe the city could build on New Zealands identity as a clean green country to capture the attention of foreign investors looking to invest in sustainable technologies. The green economy is about the bare essentials of everyday life, energy (food as a source of energy for humans), being affordable for every household in Christchurch and in New Zealand. The green economy is also about maintaining the priceless scenic natural environment of New Zealand to create an
Zhi Jian (David) Wong 021 115 7897 environment for innovative individuals who want to stay in Christchurch; where professionals gather to see how theories of sustainability are put into practice to rejuvenate life and activity within this fallen city. Being sustainable is not about getting rich quickly but rather creating a high quality of life that everyone enjoys.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
3
News.
Christchurch
quake
in
numbers.
3
News.
2012
21-February.
http://www.3news.co.nz/Christchurch-quake-in- numbers/tabid/423/articleID/243668/Default.aspx
(accessed
2012
16-April).
Beacon
Pathway
Limited.
Valuing
homes
that
perform
well.
Beacon.
2009
April.
http://beaconpathway.co.nz/being-homesmart/article/valuing_homes_that_perform_well
(accessed
2012
9-April).
Christchurch
Agency
for
Energy.
"CAfE
Graphing
Tool."
Christchurch
Agency
for
Energy.
2012.
http://cafe.gen.nz/db
(accessed
03
28,
2012).
EECA.
Hydro
energy.
EECA.
http://www.eeca.govt.nz/efficient-and-renewable- energy/renewable-energy/hydro-energy
(accessed
2012
16-April).
Einstein,
Albert.
Collected
Quotes
from
Albert
Einstein.
http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html
(accessed
2012
16-4).
Energy
Efficiency
and
Conservation
Authority.
Solar
Master/Solar
Max
2012.
May
2001.
http://www.solarmax.co.nz/downloads
(accessed
March
20,
2012).
Fairfax
NZ
News.
Earthquake
Commission
out
of
cash.
stuff.co.nz.
2011
30-August.
http://www.rebuildchristchurch.co.nz/blog/2011/8/stuff-co-nz-30-000-houses-munted
(accessed
2012
16-April).
Moore,
Bill.
"Deal
set
to
boost
solar
venture."
Nelson
Mail.
March
2,
2012.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/nelson-mail/news/6361304/Deal-set-to-boost-solar-venture
(accessed
April
5,
2012).
National
Party.
"Energy
and
Resources
Policy."
2011.
http://www.national.org.nz/PDF_General/Energy_and_Resources_policy.pdf
(accessed
April
22,
2012).
Spronken-Smith,
R.A.,
Sturman,
A.P.,
Wilton,
E.
"The
air
pollution
problem
in
Christchurch,
New
Zealand
-
progress
and
prospects."
University
of
Canterbury.
2002.
http://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/3507
(accessed
April
4,
2012).
TEEB
The
Economics
of
Ecosystems
and
Biodiversity.
"TEEB
Manual
for
Cities:
Ecosystem
Services
in
Urban
Management."
2011.
www.teebweb.org
(accessed
march
19,
2012).