Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
31 May 2011
Harvard Business School Negotiation, Organizations and Markets Research Papers HARVARD NOM UNIT RESEARCH PAPER NO. 11-067 BARBADOS GROUP WORKING PAPER NO. 11-01
Living With Mastery: Where Life Actually Happens (PDF file of PowerPoint Slides)
Originally posted 16 January 2011, Updated 31 May 2011
WERNER ERHARD
Independent
werhard@ssrn.com
MICHAEL C. JENSEN
Jessie Isidor Strauss Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus, Harvard Business School
mjensen@hbs.edu
JOSEPH J. DIMAGGIO, MD
Director of Research and Development, Landmark Education, LLC
jdimaggio@attglobal.net
Versions of the material in this presentation are part of a leadership course (Being a Leader, and the Effective Exercise of Leadership: An Ontological Model) authored by Werner Erhard, Michael C. Jensen, Steve Zaffron, and Kari Granger. FAIR USE: You may redistribute the URL for this document freely, but please do not post the electronic file on the web. We welcome web links to this document at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1720884 We revise our papers regularly, and providing a link to the original ensures that readers will receive the most recent version. Thank you, W. Erhard, M. Jensen, J. DiMaggio. Some of the material presented in this paper is based on or derived from the consulting and program material of the Vanto Group, and from material presented in the Landmark Forum and other programs offered by Landmark Education LLC, as well as from an international, interdisciplinary group of scholars, consultants and practitioners working under the name of The Barbados Group. The ideas and the methodology created by Werner Erhard underlie much of the material.
Comments welcome
31 May 2011
Abstract
Note that this paper is a copy of the slides presented in a talk for the general public. It presents a way of accessing ones life and who one is for oneself based on studying masters (e.g., master athletes, master physicists, master physicians, and master musicians). Like masters of these specialized areas of life, while masters of life are innately ordinary people, they see (experience) life the world, others, and themselves differently than most of us do. As a consequence, they comprehend and interact with the world, others, and themselves differently than most of us do. And, it is the way they interact with life and with themselves that makes them extraordinarily effective in dealing with life while enjoying an exceptionally high quality of life. This presentation spells out the way in which masters access life and themselves, and does so in words that make mastery available to the rest of us ordinary people.
The more scholarly paper from which much of this presentation is drawn is available on the Social Science Research Network at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1437027 Versions of the material in this presentation are part of a leadership course (Being a Leader, and the Effective Exercise of Leadership: An Ontological/Phenomenological Model) authored by Werner Erhard, Michael C. Jensen, Steve Zaffron, and Kari Granger. Some of the material in this presentation is based on or derived from the consulting and program material of the Vanto Group, and from material presented in the Landmark Forum and other programs offered by Landmark Education LLC, as well as from an international, interdisciplinary group of scholars, consultants and practitioners working under the name of The Barbados Group. The ideas and the methodology created by Werner Erhard underlie much of the material. FAIR USE: You may redistribute the URL for this document freely, but please do not post the electronic file on the web. We welcome web links to this document at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1720884
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
What You Hear Tonight Will Be Mostly All New For You
Because what you hear tonight will be mostly all new for you, a good deal of what is presented will be counter-intuitive that is, in conflict with what you have come to believe. (When what we have come to believe is shared with most others, it is sometimes referred to as common-sense e.g., three centuries ago the belief that the sun goes around the earth.) Because what we do tonight will be new and quite challenging, I request that you work along with me. In other words, please dont just listen. Look for yourself at what is being said, and think for yourself about what is said. Please ask questions and make comments when you have them.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
30-May-2011
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
How To Deal With What Is In Conflict With What You Currently Believe
Because what is being presented tonight will be challenging, I will read out-loud each of the sentences on the slides, and I request that as I read what is said on a slide, you read along with me silently to yourself. When you hear something that is counter to what you believe, rather than dismissing it as nonsense and simply persisting in what you believe, check it out in life as life is actually lived to confirm in your own experience whether it is valid or not. See if what is presented is consistent with life as you actually live it, even if it is in conflict with what you currently believe.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
Glossary Of Terms
On the next few slides I will explain what is meant by three of the specialized terms you will hear tonight. 1. Conversational Domain 2. Way of Being 3. Way of Acting
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
10
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
11
12
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
13
21-April-2011
14
15
30-May-2011
16
17
30-May-2011
18
19
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
21
22
23
30-May-2011
24
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
26
27
28
29
30
Confirm In Your Own Experience What We Have Said About Way Of Being
Even if you already understand what we have said about Way of Being, please dont go on to the next blue colored slide until you have confirmed in your own experience that at each moment, whether you are paying attention to it or not, you have a Way of Being (something going on with you internally). Confirm that your Way of Being is composed of 1) a mental state, 2) an emotional state (the combination of these two states is sometimes referred to as our mood), 3) a bodily state, and 4) thoughts (includes memories). A suggestion for doing this is on the next two slides.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
31
30-May-2011
32
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
34
35
37
38
39
40
What Is The Relation Between The Way You Act and Your Way of Being?
On the next series of slides we will discuss the way in which your Way of Acting and your Way of Being are related to each other.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
42
43
44
Confirm For Yourself That Your Way of Being And Acting Are Consistent With Each Other
While we may notice our way of being before we act (at least our mood or thoughts), when we act we are most of the time either so focused on what we are doing, or on automatic when doing it, that we dont pay attention to what is going on with us internally (our Way of Being). To confirm or not that your Actions and your Way of Being are consistent with each other, check it out in your own experience. Do this by getting in touch with your memory of a situation in which you acted in some way.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
45
Confirm In Your Memory That Your Way of Being And Acting Are Consistent With Each Other
If you work at it, you will locate in a memory of acting some aspects of your internal state that were present while you were acting in that way. And, you will notice that some combination of the aspects of your internal state were consistent with your actions. An easy example is remembering a time when you spoke harshly to someone. You should be able to notice in that memory that while you were speaking harshly you also felt angry or frustrated. As we said, your way of acting and your way of being are consistent with each other.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
While Your Way of Being and the Way You Act Are Consistent with Each Other, Your Way of Being Does Not Cause Your Actions
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
47
Neuroscience Research: Your Way of Being Does Not Cause Your Actions
That our Actions are consistent with our Way of Being has allowed most of us to believe that our Actions are caused by our Way of Being. That is, most of us believe that some combination of our attitude or state of mind, and/or our emotions or the way we feel, and/or our body sensations, and/or our thoughts (what we decide to do) cause us to act in the way we do. However, neuroscience research has shown that our Way of Being does not cause our Actions.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
48
Neuroscience Research: Your Way of Being Does Not Cause Your Actions
Neuroscience research has shown that the neural patterns in our brain that give rise to our Way of Being and the neural patterns in our brain that give rise to our Actions are always networked together.
(Clancey, 1993, p.5, and Hawkins, 2004, p.157)
That is, our Way of Being and our Way of Acting come together as though one thing. If you clasp your two hands together by interlacing the fingers of one hand with the fingers of the other hand, you have a metaphor for networked together. Notice that one hand does not cause the other hand, and yet they both move together as though one thing.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
49
50
51
52
What Appears To Be Going On Consciously Contrasted With What Is Going On In Our Brains
It looks to us like our Way of Being causes our Way of Acting because when we are in a situation that calls for action, at a conscious level we have the thought (decide) to act in some way, and then we act. This makes it look to us like the decision comes before the action. That is what leads us to believe that our Way of Being causes our Way of Acting, and that belief is so strong it makes it difficult for many people to consider anything contrary to that belief. However, what is going on in our brain that generates our conscious thought to act and generates our physical action happens in a very different way than the way it appears to us at a conscious level.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
53
54
55
The Front Of Your Hand And The Back Of Your Hand Come Together As One Thing
Your Way of Being and your Way of Acting are like the front of your hand and the back of your hand. While you can distinguish the front of your hand from the back of your hand, you cannot separate the front of your hand from the back of your hand the front of your hand and the back of your hand come together in one package. Likewise with your way of being and acting. While you can distinguish your way of being from your actions, it is as though a persons way of being and acting are one thing they come together as one package, that is they arise together.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
56
Confirm For Yourself That What You Decide Does Not Cause You To Act
Because it appears that your Actions are caused by your Way of Being, confirming that what you decide does not cause your actions is a bit difficult, but try out the following: Do you always do what you intended to do? If not, intending does not cause you to act. Do you always do what you decided you would do? If not, deciding does not cause you to act. Decide to jump up in the air and see if having made that decision causes you to jump up in the air.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
57
30-May-2011
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
59
SUMMARY
Summary So Far
So far we have explicated the following specialized terms: Conversational Domain Way of Being You Are Not Who You Think You Are Way of Acting While Your Way of Being and Your Actions Are Consistent With Each Other, Your Way of Being Does Not Cause Your Actions
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
60
SUMMARY
Summary So Far
1. The world of mastery is constituted by a unique conversational domain (linguistic domain), from which a master lives and interacts with life. As is the case with a master physician or master plumber, the conversational domain for mastery in life is also made up of specialized terms that are networked together in a specific way to form the linguistic domain through which a master perceives, comprehends, and interacts with life that is, with the world, others, and himself or herself.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
61
SUMMARY
Summary So Far
2. While you may have a typical way of being, and may even be resigned to that way of being, that is just a Way of Being, it is not who you are really. You are not who you know yourself to be, that is, you are not who you think you are. Who you know yourself to be, who you think you are, is nothing more than a Way of Being. This is the first critical point about the way a master experiences life.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
62
SUMMARY
Summary So Far
3. While your Actions from moment to moment are consistent with some combination of the aspects of your Way of Being in those moments, your Actions are not caused by your Way of Being (what is going on with you internally) your Actions and your Way of Being come together as one package, that is they arise together. Your Way of Being (what is going on with you internally) and your Way of Acting are networked together and arise as though one thing.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
63
SUMMARY
64
SUMMARY
65
SUMMARY
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
66
SUMMARY
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
Glossary Of Terms
On the next few slides I will explain what is meant by three more of the terms you will hear tonight. 1. What You Are Dealing With 2. Occur 3. Correlated
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
69
70
71
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
72
30-May-2011
73
30-May-2011
74
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
75
Summary Of What Is Meant By What You Are Dealing With What You Are Dealing With includes each of the following: 1. The circumstances on which you are acting. 2. The circumstances in which you are acting on whatever you are acting on. 3. The way in which you occur for yourself when acting on whatever you are acting on in the circumstances in which you are acting.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
76
Summary Of What Is Meant By What You Are Dealing With On the following slides we will always put the term the circumstances you are dealing with in quotes to help you remember that what you are dealing with always includes 1) the circumstances on which you are acting, 2) the circumstances in which you are acting on whatever you are acting on, and 3) the way in which you occur for yourself when acting on whatever you are acting on in the circumstances in which you are acting.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
78
GLOSSARY OCCUR
79
GLOSSARY OCCUR
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
80
GLOSSARY OCCUR
81
GLOSSARY OCCUR
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
83
GLOSSARY CORRELATED
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
84
GLOSSARY CORRELATED
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
85
GLOSSARY CORRELATED
87
30-May-2011
88
89
30-May-2011
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
91
92
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
93
94
More Neuroscience Research: Way of Being And Acting Is Correlated With The Occurring
If you would like more research evidence that action is naturally, necessarily closely connected with (interrelated with, in-a-dance-with) the way in which the circumstances you are dealing with occur for you, in Appendix A there are quotes of research findings from each of ten referenced sources. As an indication of what those sources have to say, on the next two slides there are five short quotes from those references.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
95
It is in fact essential to recognize that the possibilities of action subtend the perceptual process [that is, the way the world, others, and you yourself occur for you] ... (Delevoye-Turrell et al. 2010, p.236 emphasis added)
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
96
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
97
98
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
99
100
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
102
30-May-2011
103
104
Putting What We Said On The First Slide Of This Section All Together
You have something powerful to say about your way of being and acting in life because your way of being (what is going on with you internally) and your way of acting is naturally correlated with the way in which the circumstances you are dealing with occur for you, and that occurring is either constituted in language or is at least shaped and colored by language, and is in any case always accessible through language.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
105
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
106
107
108
Substituting The Phrase The Circumstances You Are Dealing With for Life
The way you choose to speak to yourself and others about the circumstances you are dealing with determines the way in which the circumstances you are dealing with occur for you. And, your way of being and acting is naturally correlated with (in-adance-with) that occurring.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
109
Substituting The Phrase The Circumstances You Are Dealing With for Life
Saying the same thing more fully: The way you choose to speak to yourself and others about 1) the circumstances on which you are acting, and 2) the circumstances in which you are acting, plus 3) the way in which you occur for yourself in those circumstances, determines the way in which each of those occurs for you. And, your way of being and acting is correlated with that occurring.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
110
The Impact Of Language On The Way In Which The Circumstances Occur For You
As an object, the wall in the room you are in exists independent of language. All you can do with language is to get your words to match the object out there hard, impenetrable, unmoving. However, about a situation you are dealing with, difficult for example, exists only in language. There is no difficult out there. Difficult is an interpretation in language. The facts of the situation you are dealing with are as they are. By contrast, difficult is an interpretation or a story that becomes your context for dealing with the facts of the situation. Of course, situations can occur for you as difficult, but do so only because you say so.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
111
What Is Difficult?
When someone says that what they are dealing with is difficult, I sometimes take a page out of the Zen Masters handbook and say, Ive never seen that. Bring me some difficult so I can see it. Of course difficult does not exist in the circumstances themselves difficult exists only as an interpretation constituted in language. The circumstances are whatever they are what we might call whats so. When you add the interpretation difficult that becomes the context through which you attempt to deal with whats so. Whales exist in a challenging environment, but I doubt that for whales life ever occurs as difficult.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
112
113
30-May-2011
114
In Other Words, What Dr. Boroditsky Is Telling Us Is Consistent With What We Have Said
Language has power! Language (what you say and what you listen to) impacts the way in which the circumstances you are dealing with occur for you. And, your way of being and acting is naturally correlated with the way the circumstances you are dealing with occur for you. This means that language (what you say and what you listen to) gives you the power to shape and direct your way of being and acting in life. In short, what you say about life powerfully determines your way of being and acting in life.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
The Difference Between The Facts And Your Interpretations And Story About The Facts
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
116
117
The Difference Between The Facts And Your Interpretations And Story About The Facts
About the facts of the circumstances you are dealing with, you have no choice. But most people confuse their story about and interpretations added to those facts as facts themselves, which they most definitely are not. When you treat your story about and interpretations added to the facts of the circumstances you are dealing with as though they were a fact, you make of that story and those interpretations something you have to deal with like they were facts about which you have no choice. In other words, you are no longer dealing with the facts; you are now attempting to deal with those facts all tangled up with your interpretations and your story.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
118
30-May-2011
119
The Difference Between The Facts And Your Interpretations And Story About The Facts
You must look honestly and critically at the circumstances you are dealing with so that you are able to separate for yourself what the facts actually are regarding the circumstances you are dealing with and what stories or interpretations have been tangled up with those facts. When you have done this, you can release yourself from the disempowering grip of the story and interpretations when treated as facts you have to deal with by simply recognizing them as nothing more than story or interpretation.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
120
The Difference Between The Facts And Your Interpretations And Story About The Facts
If any aspect of the story or interpretation empowers or enables you in dealing with the facts, as long as you dont confuse them as a fact, you can keep that story or interpretation present for yourself along with the facts. More importantly, when you have distinguished the facts of the circumstances you are dealing with from any story or interpretation about those facts, you have the opportunity to use language to create a context from which to view the facts in a way that leaves you with power, freedom, full self-expression, and peace of mind in engaging with and taking on the circumstances you are dealing with.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
122
30-May-2011
123
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
125
SUMMARY
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
29-April-2011
126
SUMMARY
127
SUMMARY
128
SUMMARY
30-May-2011
129
SUMMARY
130
SUMMARY
131
SUMMARY
A Caution
As we said, what we have discussed tonight is not about positive thinking (what we might call woo-woo thinking). That is, what we have discussed tonight is not about glossing over, or attempting to see what you are confronted with in life more positively than it actually is (and by the way, equally woo-woo, not more negatively than it actually is). A master sees what he or she is confronted with as it is, without embellishment one way or the other. What makes a master a master is what we earlier termed honest thinking coupled with a context the master creates through language that allows the master to see possibilities in whatever he or she is confronted with.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
132
SUMMARY
A Caution
The other thing to watch out for is fantasy thinking (more woo-woo thinking). Specifically fantasy thinking is wanting (wishing for) something that has no possible reality when looked at from the perspective of being-in-the-world. You dont need to know how to get there, but there has to be in the realm of the possible when looked at from the perspective of being-in-the-world. Fantasy thinking is illustrated by an old joke which appears on the next slide.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
133
SUMMARY
A Caution
Two brothers are confronted by a room full of horse shit. One brother walks away from the room to seek something with more possibility for achievement. The other brother gets into the room with a shovel saying with all this horse shit there must be a pony in here someplace. Every once in a while, there is a pony buried in a room full of horse shit, and if you like the odds, go for it. But honest thinking about what you are confronted with is likely to leave you with more possibility and power.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
135
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
136
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
137
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
138
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
Confirm In Your Own Experience That Where You Are Is Here, And Everything Else Is There
While that you are located here and everything else is located there may at first seem trivial, I propose that later in this experiment you will see that this fundamental assumption about here and there shapes and colors the way in which you experience you and everything-not-you. Right now, take the time to check out in your own experience if it is a fact for you that where you (what you refer to when you say I or me) exist is here, and where everything else exists is there. Remember that what we mean by check out in your own experience is not what you think or believe, but the way in which you experience life as life is lived.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
139
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
Confirm In Your Own Experience That Where You Are Is Here, And Everything Else Is There
The one thing you have to watch out for in conducting this experiment is when you treat yourself as though you were two people namely, a you in the present that is referring to a you that existed in the past or will exist in the future. On the next slide, we will give you an example.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
140
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
Confirm In Your Own Experience That Where You Are Is Here, And Everything Else Is There
For example, in response to someones question you might reply Ive been there or I will be there (referring to a location where you were in the past or will be in the future). In either case, the you who is speaking in the present is for you here and the you that you are imagining in the past or the future, because this is not you but a recalled or imagined you, was or will be there. When you were there in the past it was here for you, and when you get there in the future it will be here for you. The real you is always here. Before going on, confirm this for yourself.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
141
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
Confirm In Your Own Experience That Where You Are Is Here, And Everything Else Is There
The other thing you have to watch out for in conducting this experiment is when you treat something not you (lets call it X) as being here that is, located where you are. In such a case, you might point to something that is close to you (X), and say, X is over here. However, if that something (X) is not for you here where you are, you are likely to point to that something and say, X is there. The point is, that we sometimes treat things that are close to us as being here where we are, that is here with us.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
14-April-2011
142
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
Confirm In Your Own Experience That Where You Are Is Here, And Everything Else Is There
After seeing that the apparent anomalies that we just explained ultimately wind up with you here and everything not you there, if you check it out in your own experience, you will find that for you what you are referring to when you say I or me is always located here, and everything not you is for you always located there.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
14-April-2011
143
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
144
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
145
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
146
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
147
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
148
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
14-April-2011
149
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
30-May-2011
150
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
151
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
30-May-2011
152
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
153
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
154
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
155
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
156
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
157
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
158
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
159
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
160
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
Out-Here
Maybe who you are is not located in here with life located out there. Rather, as life is actually lived, who you are is located where what a master calls out-here out where life (the world, others, and who you are referring to when you say I or me) actually happens for you. This is where a master lives: out-here, living where life actually happens. As lived, you are the clearing in which the world, others, and the you that you refer to when you say I or me, show up for you. And to bring us back to where we started in this presentation, your actions in that clearing are correlated with the way in which what is in the clearing occurs for you.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
161
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
162
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
163
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
The Choice
You can go on choosing to take yourself to be and experience living in-here, with life out-there. Or, based on your experience (examination) of where life actually shows up for you, you can take yourself to be and experience living out-here where life actually happens.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
164
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
By taking a stand on yourself as out-here, you will actually experience yourself being out-here, and interacting with life where life actually happens.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
165
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
166
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
The Truth
Which is true, I am in-here or I am out-here? Neither is true as a matter of fact. It is a fact that most people live the unexamined assumption that where they are located is in-here with everything else located out-there. However, it is also a fact that given a chance to get beyond their assumption and get in touch with their actual experience, they will find that their perception of the world, others, and what they refer to when they say I or me is actually happening for them out-there where they said they are not. That is, as lived, life shows up in the clearing that one is out-here. But to say that either in-here or out-here is the truth is not true. Neither is to be believed.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
167
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
168
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
In Summary
We are not arguing that one of these (being in-here or out-here) is right and the other wrong. Rather we are saying that you have a choice. People who practice being aware of where their experience of objects and situations in the world, and of other people in the world, is actually happening, report a breakthrough in their effectiveness in dealing with the world and with others. In addition, the access one has to I or me is greater when your relation to I and me is that I and me show up in the clearing you are. This allows you a certain detachment from your automatic way of being that leaves you free to be.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
169
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
170
SUMMARY
171
SUMMARY
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
172
SUMMARY
173
A PERSONAL EXPERIMENT
174
Appendix A
Action representations can be viewed as a component of a predictive system that includes a neural process, which simulates through motor imagery the dynamic behavior of the body in relation to the environment (Grush, 2004; Jordan, 1995; Wolpert et al., 1995). This view suggests that the presentation of a visual stimulus [the occurring] may evoke automatically a potential motor action (Jeannerod, 2003) (Delevoye-Turrell et al. 2010, p.224)
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved.
30-May-2011
175
Appendix A (Contd)
The data presented in this chapter underline the importance of processing visual information [the occurring] in relation to one's action possibilities It is in fact essential to recognize that the possibilities of action subtend the perceptual process of the basic organization of the external world. This is similar to the sense of spatiality developed in phenomenological philosophy by authors like Heidegger, Husserl, or even Merleau-Ponty who suggested that 'locations within space are not to be defined as objective positions in relation to the objective position of our body; rather, they inscribe around us the variable reach of our intentions or of our movements' (Merleau-Ponty, 1945). In line with this perspective, we have provided in the present chapter arguments suggesting that motor representations may be viewed as a component of a predictive system that includes a neural process which simulates through motor imagery the dynamic behaviour of the body in relation to its environment.
(Delevoye-Turrell et al. 2010, p.236)
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
176
Appendix A (Contd)
Since Berkeley's famous essay on vision, theorists of perception have defended the idea that the experience of spatiality proceeds from an interpretation of sensory information through reference to the possibilities of action (Berkeley, 1709[1985]). ... According to [Merleau-Ponty (1945)], locations within space are not to be defined as objective positions in relation to the objective position of our body; rather they inscribe around us the variety of reaches that our limbs can produce. Space is thus not uniform but depends on our past experiences about opportunities, effects and costs of acting in a given environment, with our own body parts (Previc, 1998; Proffitt 2006b). It is also necessary to consider that possibilities of action may subtend the process of constitution of the perceived external environment. Indeed, in a social context, it seems necessary to define those spatial areas that surround our body according to the specific possibilities of functional interactions with objects and/or individuals within these areas. (Delevoye-Turrell et al. 2010, p.218)
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
177
Appendix A (Contd)
To help bring the claims of the actionist [one who holds the position that perceptual consciousness depends constitutively on perceivers practical grasp of the significance of movement and action for perceptual experience (No 2010, p.245)], sensorimotor view, into focus, and to get a feel for its significance and reach, lets consider a well-known but poorly understood phenomenon: the effects of inverting or reversing goggles. Individuals who wear the lenses for lengthy periods of time, and who are made to engage dynamically with the environment around them as they do so, eventually recover normal perceptual experience (Kohler, 1951; Taylor, 1962). Such individuals experience the position and layout of things as they are, even though they continue to wear the reversing goggles, and continue to receive inverted patterns of stimulation. Once again, how things look depends less on the discrete, individual, intrinsic character of stimulation, than it does on the way that stimulation is governed by patterns of sensorimotor contingency. (No 2010,
p.246 - emphasis added)
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
178
Appendix A (Contd)
According to the sensorimotor or, as I shall call it, actionist approach, perceiving is an activity of exploring the environment making use of this kind of knowledge of the sensory effects of movement.
(No 2010, p.245)
seeing is an exploratory activity mediated by the mastery of the sensorimotor contingencies. (No and
ORegan 2002, p.567)
conscious visual experience presents the world to the subject in a richly textured way ... [which is] especially apt for, and typically utilized in, the control and guidance of fine-tuned, real world activity [action]. (Clark 2001, p.496 )
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
179
Appendix A (Contd)
having a perspective means that what you experience and perceive depends systematically on what you do, as well as vice versa. (Hurley 1998, p.86) His [man's] perception is dynamic because it is related to action - what can be done in a given space ... (Hall 1966, p.115) Integration of Perceiving and Moving and Higher Order Serial Organizations Is Dialectic Coherent Subprocesses Arise Together Not Via Linear Causality or Parallelism: Perceiving, thinking, and moving always occur together, as coherent coordinations of activity (Dewey, 1896/1981a).
(Clancey 1993, p.91)
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
180
Appendix A (Contd)
These global patterns of neural activity are at all times locked into both sensory and motor patterns of input and output. These findings are interpreted to cut against computational accounts of olfaction as requiring decompositional structure and contextindependent symbols (Skarda and Freeman 1987, pp. 172-73, 184, etc.; Freeman 1991, pp. 36-37, 41, etc.). In sum, neurophysiological evidence at both the single-cell and cell population levels suggest shared coding for perception and action: that the contents of both perceptions and intentions can depend on neural processes that blend sensory and motor features. (Hurley 1998, p.415)
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
181
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
Bennis, Warren G. and Robert J. Thomas. Crucibles of Leadership. Harvard Business Review, September 2002 Boroditsky, Lera. 2010. Lost In Translation. Wall Street Journal. 23 July 2010. Clancey, W.J. 1993. Situated action: A neurophysiological response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science. V 17, 87-116. Clark, A. 2001. Visual experience and motor action: Are the bonds too tight?. Philosophical Review 110: 495-519. Delevoye-Turrell, Yvonne, Angela Bartolo, and Yonn Coello. 2010. Motor Representations and the Perception of Space: Perceptual Judgments of the Boundary of Action Space. In Perception, Action, and Consciousness: Sensorimotor Dynamics and Two Visual Systems, eds. Gangopadhyay, Nivedita, Michael Madary, and Finn Spicer, 217-242. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hall, E.T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. New York: Anchor books. Hawkins, Jeff, with Sandra Blakeslee. 2004. On Intelligence. New York, NY: Henry Holt LLC. Heidegger, Martin. 1927. Being and Time. Trans. Joan Stambaugh. 1996. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011
182
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
Hurley, Susan. 1998. Consciousness in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Libet, Benjamin. 1993. Neurophysiology of Consciousness: Selected Papers and New Essays. Boston MA: Birkhauser No, Alva. 2010. Vision Without Representation. In Perception, Action, and Consciousness: Sensorimotor Dynamics and Two Visual Systems, eds. Gangopadhyay, Nivedita, Michael Madary, and Finn Spicer, 245-256. Oxford: Oxford University Press. No, Alva, and J.K ORegan. 2002. On the Brain Basis of Perceptual Consciousness. In Vision and Mind: Selective Readings in the Philosophy of Perception, eds. No, Alva, and E. Thompson, 567-98. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Rowe, Dorothy. 2010. Liar, liar: Why deception is our way of life. New Scientist. 21 June 2010. Wolpert, Daniel M. 2009. Fred Kavli Distinguished International Scientist Lecture at the Society for Neuroscience meeting: Neuroscience 2009, as quoted in the Kavli Foundation Newsletter, http://www.kavlifoundation.org/science-spotlights/smart-moves-danielwolpert-motor-control-and-brain, accessed on 28 December 2010.
Copyright 2010 2011 W. Erhard, Landmark Education LLC. All rights reserved. 30-May-2011