Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Analytical Letters
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lanl20
Application of Improved Azomethine-H Method to the Determination of Boron in Soils and Plants
Matt K. John , Hong H Chuah
b a a a b a
Soil and Feed Testing Laboratory, Field Crops Branch, British Columbia, Department of Agriculture, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada Available online: 05 Dec 2006
To cite this article: Matt K. John, Hong H Chuah & John H. Neufeld (1975): Application of Improved Azomethine-H Method to the Determination of Boron in Soils and Plants, Analytical Letters, 8:8, 559-568 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00032717508058240
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/termsand-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
and Jo h n H. Neufeld
Anong 15 i o n s s t u d i e d , o n l y f l u o r i d e ,
i o n s were 5,000 ppm f l u o r i d e , 3.000 ppm aluminum, 2,500 ppm c u p r i c and 200 ppzi f e r r i c i o n .
a n a sewage s l u u g e e x t r a c t were in c l o s e agreement w i t h r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d by t h e c a r n i n e method. The proposed azometliine-1 method was found
a d v a n t a g e o u s s i n c e use of c o n c e r . t r a t e u s u l p h u r i c a c i d i s a v o i d e d and
smaller v a r i a t i o n s i n r e s u l t s
and s u p e r i o r precision a r e o b t a i n e d .
559
Copyright 0 1975 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All Rignts Reserved Neither this work nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
560 INTRODUCTION
employing a ~ o m e t h i n e - H ~ *was ~a d a p t e d t o d e t e r m i n e boron i n a c i d i c ~ sodium a c e t a t e e x t r a c t s and s u l p h u r i c a c i d d i g e ~ t s . However, more ~ i n f o r m a t i o n i s needed t o assess t h e methods p r e c i s i o n and a d a p t a b i l i t y t o o t h e r commonly used e x t r a c t i o n o r d i g e s t i o n p r o c e d u r e s . Factors
Fresh reagent
am ground.
561
adding a c t i v a t e d c h a r c o a l , f i l t e r e d through Whatman No. 42 p a p e r and c o l l e c t e d i n acid-weathered f u n n e l t u b e s . S u r f a c e samples of Monroe and Ladner s o i l s were c o l l e c t e d from cultivated fields i n B.C.'s 20-mesh. Lower F r a s e r V a l l e y , a i r - d r i e d and c r u s h e d t o
niin u s i n g a batch-handling
'
Extracts were
water.
Sewage s l u d g e was o b t a i n e d from a t r e a t m e n t p l a n t t h a t s e r v e s m e t r o p o l i t a n Vancouver, B.C., a i r - d r i e d and ground. llot water e x t r a c t s
were p r e p a r e d as d e s c r i b e d f o r soils.
Deterciination of Boron
Unless s p e c i f i e d o t h e r w i s e , 1 m l of b l a n k , boron s t a n d a r d
OK
sample
a portable e l e c t r i c a l stirrer.
The r e a c t i o n m i x t u r e was a g a i n s t i r r e d thoroughly and. t h e n allowed t o s t a n d a t room t e m p e r a t u r e f o r 30 n i n . Absorbance a t 420nm was measured The 10-cm r e f e r e n c e and
w i t h a Beckman, Noael D B , s p e c t r o p h o t o m e t e r .
saniple c u v e t t e s were maintained a t room t e m p e r a t u r e by c i r c u l a t i n g water through t h e sample compartment jacl,et. D u p l i c a t e d e t e r m i n a t i o u s of boron i n 4 r e p l i c a t e s of e a c h sample s o l u t i o n were conducted by t h e proposed azomethine-H method and by t h e carmine metliocr d e s c r i b e d by Hatcher and Wilcox. obtaineci by tile two methods were compared.
The r e s u l t s and p r e c i s i o n
562
IUiSULTS APlLl
1)IscussIoIu
complex formed w i t h t h e 2 ppm
boron s t a n d a r d was mxinium a t 410 t o 4 2 0 n m b u t d e c l i n e d 10% a t 430-e The 42bnm wavelength was selected. Although a l i q u o t s i z e v a r i e a from 0 . 2 t o 2 ml, a b s o r b a n c e by t h e r e s u l t a n t b o r i c a c i d - a z o m e t h i n e complex was l i n e a r l y r e l a t e d t o a l i q u o t boron c o n c e n t r a t i o n r a n g i n g from 0.5 t o 8 ppm. The r e a c t i o n complex
obeyeu t h e Lambert-Beer
l a w w i t h i n t h e r a n g e of b o r o n c o n c e n t r a t i o n and
1) were o b s e r v e d
0.4
6C
0.3
*
(v
s
0.2
1 a
i
0.1
10
20
FIG. 1
30
Time (min)
b0
50
LfiiLt
563
w i t h i n 10 min a t 4 5 O C .
a f t e r 30 ruin a t 2 3 O C . r e p o r t e d by Basson g
A.2when
t e m p e r a t u r e exceeded 4 O o C d u r i n g a n When a r e a g e n t b l a n k , p r e p a r e d w i t h
u n s p e c i f i e d c o l o u r development p e r i o d .
water, was p l a c e d i n t h e sample c u v e t t e and a b s o r b a n c e r e l a t i v e t o water o r a i r i n t h e r e f e r e n c e c u v e t t e was monitored w i t h o u t t e m p e r a t u r e c o n t r o l , a b s o r b a n c e a e c r e a s e d w i t h t i m e and a s i g n i f i c a n t d e c r e a s e was o b s e r v e d w i t h i n 5 min. However, a b s o r b a n c e remained c o n s t a n t when t e m p e r a t u r e was U n l e s s t e m p e r a t u r e was r e g u l a t e d , c o n t i n u e d e x p o s u r e
regulated at 23OC.
1, 2 ,
OK
increased slightly.
O n t h e o t h e r hand, d e c r e a s e d a b s o r b a n c e r e l a t i v e
t o a f r e s h b l a n k was o b s e r v e d when b l a n k s anti s t a r . d a r d s were d e v e l o p e d f o r 4 h r and t h e d e c r e a s e was g r e a t e s t a t h i g h e r b o r o n c o n c e n t r a t i o n s . E x t e n d i n g t h e development p e r i o d beyond 30 min, such a s t h e 1 o r 2 hr p e r i o d s recomnended by w o l f 5 , p r o v i d e d no a d v a n t a g e . Optimum s e n s i t i v i t y
564
t e m p e r a t u r e (23OC), a b s o r b a n c e was measured a f t e r 30 min a t t h e same t e m p e r a t u r e and f r e s h r e a g e n t b l a n k s were s u b s t i t u t e d a t i n t e r v a l s . Absorbauce by complexes w i t h 2 ppm b o r o n s t a n d a r d i n c r e a s e d c o n c e n t r a t i o n of azomethine-H
(Fig. 2).
as
r e a g e n t was used.
nunlbers of samples, s u c h as i n c o r p o r a t i n g boron d e t e r m i n a t i o n a s a r o u t i n e a n a l y s i s in soil and p l a n t material t e s t i n g programs, t h e economics of u s i n g r e l a t i v e l y e x p e n s i v e azomethine-H must be c o n s i d e r e d . r e a g e n t c o n c e n t r a t i o n of 0.8 g Although
/ 100 m l p r o v i d e d t h e b e s t s e n s i t i v i t y ,
0.4
0.3
0
i !
o.2
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.o
1.2
FIG. 2
E f f e c t of azomethino-H r e a g e n t c o n c e n t r a t i o n on c o l o u r (2ppm boaon)
565
1 U 0 nl gave a d e q u a t e s e n s i t i v i t y f o r r o u t i n e a n a l y s i s ,
c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n sample a l i q u o t .
The c o n c e n t r a t i o n of 0 . 4 5 g
/ 100 m l
a c i d i n t h e a z o m e t h i n e r e a g e n t i n d i c a t e d t h e p r e s e n c e of 1, 2 . 5 , o r 5 % a s c o r b i c a c i d w a s b e n e f i c i a l but i t s absence
OK
c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of 7 . 5 and
10% u i d n o t p r o v i u e a s t a b l e r e a g e n t .
S i n c e c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of 2.5 o r 5%
d i d n o t p r o v i d e a d d i t i o n a l s t a b i l i t y , u s e of 1% s c o r b i c a c i d w a s a d o p t e d . a Whereas c o n s i d e r a b l e loss of s e n s i t i v i t y was o b s e r v e d a f t e r azomethine-1 r e a g e n t was s t o r e d a t room t e m p e r a t u r e ( 2 3 O C ) f o r 5 d a y s , no r e d u c t i o n of s e n s i t i v i t y was found when i t had b e e n s t o r e d i n a r e f r i g e r a t o r a t 4OC f o r 15 d a y s . of a a s s o n Although t h e s e r e s u l t s c o n f i r m e d t h o s e
a b s o r b a n c e by r e a g e n t b l a n k s p r e p a r e d w i t h r e a g e n t t h a t
one p r e p a r e d w i t h f r e s h azomcthinc-H r e a g e n t .
azonietliinc-11
The same b a t c h of
A s t u d y of the method's
t o l e r a n c e t o i n t c r f e r e n c e from s e l e c t e d i o n s
present
ii;
c a l c i u m , magnesium, p o t a s s i u m , sodiuin, n i t r a t e , c h l o r i d e , a c e t a t e , c i t r a t e o r o x a l a t e i o n s (to maximum 10,000 ppni c o n c e n t r a t i o c s i n v e s t i g a t e d ) i i a d e f f e c t on t h e u e t e r n i n a t i o u of a 2 ppn boroi; s t a n d a r d (Table 1 ) . C o n c e n t r a t i o n of p e r c h l o r a t e o r a r s e n a t e i o n s t o 1 0 , 0 0 0 p p n were a l s o p e r m i s s i b l e when l e s s t h a n 5% e r r o r was c o n s h e r e d t o l e r a b l e , b u t f l u o r i d e i o n c o i l c e n t r a t i o n c o u L n o t exceed 5 , O O C ppn. boron stai:darL Iflien 1-nl a l i o u o t s of 2 p p r ~ no
ppn c u p r i c i o n , use o t 2
of t:ie b u f f e r maskin::
solution c o n t a i n i n g
566
TABLE 1
Ion
Source
Error
T:
0
calcium magnesium
Ca (NO3 )
10,000
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
M i n d i l u t e {NO3 g KC 1
NaCl
IQ03
0
0
0
potassium
sod ium
0
0
HC1 CH3COONM4
(NH4) 2HC6H507
10,ooc
10,000
10,000
10,000
0
0
0 3 3
-5
2
5 5
ferric rupric
3 FeMt4(S04)2.12H20
3,000
2CO
2,500
CuO i n u i l u t e HC1
U.077
fi
1/. a s c o r b i c a c i u e f f e c t i v e l y s u p p r e s s e d i n t e r f e r e n c e .
t o l e r a b l e c o n c e n t r a t i o n s g i v e n by Basson
a,, improved
Lxpecteu when b o r o n is d e t e r m i n e d i n most s o i l and p l a n t e x t r a c t s s i n c e c o n c e n L r a t i o n s of t h e i o n s s t u d i e d a r e g e n e r a l l y below t h e d e l i n e a t e d tolerance levels. The a c c u r a c y of t h e proposed azomethine-11 method u n d e r p r a c t i c a l a p p l i c a t i o n s was i n d i c a t e u by b o r o n d e t e r m i n a t i o n s b e f o r e and a f t e r a u d i t i o n of known amounts t o a l f a l f a e x t r a c t . s o i l e x t r a c t and e f f l u e n t
567
is c o n s i d e r a b l y s u p e r i o r t o t h a t o b t a i n e d u s i n g t h e carmine
Another a d v a n t a g e of t h e azomethine-H method
i 6
elimination
Of
concentrated s u l p h u r i c a c i d
reagent.
TABLE 2 Accuracy o f Boron Determined by t h e Proposed Azomethlne-H Method When Known Amounts Were Added t o S o l u t i o n
Sample
Extraction
w'v
ratio
% Error
N - HCl
dry ash,
1:5
37.5
42.6
42.5
0.2
hot water
1:2
1.04
2.04
2.04
0.0
-----
---
0.7b
1.82
1.78
2.2
568
TABLE 3
Sample
Extraction
w'v
ratio
Carmine Mean SD
1:5
1:2
37.4
1.04
0.063
0.97
0.062
soil
water
110 t
Ladner
soil
Sewage sludge Effluent
water
hot water
1:2
2.10
0.041
2.34
0.126
1:2
1.22
0.068 0.016
0.091
1.34 0.70
0.081
-----
---
0.78
0.031
Overall
0.734
REFEr3lNCES
1.
2.
94, 1135
(1969).
3. 4.
V. Petrovsky, T a l a n t a ,
lo, 175
(1963).
5.
2, 363
(1971).
6.
7.
8.