Business Process Management Software

A Business Process Management Software will be an unavoidable facet in any growing business organization that needs fast paced fine-tuning of application processes to respond to business dynamics. Business Process Management Solutions advance a flexible framework that resides on top of the core application layer enabling rapid modeling, manipulation and optimization of enterprise business process flows and patterns. Technologically dependent on an underlying SOA based Core components, Business Process Management Solutions provide a top-down, process centric approach giving every level of the organization a deeper and broader insight into the manner in which business is being conducted. The Business Process Management Software will also be a layer of abstraction that sits on top of the existing environment to connect systems and people with no need to hard code changes into the existing environment. A process owner can now manage an end-to-end process that uses multiple legacy systems and gain much better control. ITFlux is a technology partner for the leading BPM Suite, Cordys. Through Cordys, ITFlux offers its clients an industry-leading BPM Suite, which will enable them to design, execute, monitor and improve business processes across heterogeneous systems and applications. The Cordys BPM Suite allows clients to rely on one Business Process Management Software that can efficiently create process-centric composite applications and maintain them throughout their lifecycle without worrying about the underlying workflow, semantics, user rules and applications. As one of the leading Business Process Management Solutions in the market today Cordys brings to clients a horde of BPM Tools to address the challenges of todays dynamic business environment. The Solutions can be implemented either server based or in a SAAS model through the Cordys Process Factory

ITFlux ERP Consulting Services looks at a business need in its entire totality and aims at achieving maximum business output for the most reliable cost. Information technology has transformed the way we live in and the way we do business. Since last two decades, Information Technology had made drastic changes in our life.

ERP Vendors
There are several ERP Vendors all over the world, some large and some small, while some just cater to a local market and each having great features, ERP modules and more. At ITFlux we look at ERP Products from a business value perspective and arrive at a decision on what best suits our clients. Having a million to spend does not mean you have to. There are several ERP Vendors who claim to solve every business problem but we feel our clients are very unique and our aim has been to provide our customers with a solution that they can have complete control over. We always recommend a cost effective route by implementing an opensource ERP solution that will not cost you a dime for the software and you will have a completely customized Solution implemented to use in a fraction of the cost Our ERP Consulting team will help you with analysis, customization, implementation, training, migration and ongoing support. Our existing customers have recovered the cost of implementation in less than six months and that is a great achievement compared to the millions that are spend every year on an enterprise resource planning system

ITFlux ERP Consulting group implements ERP in a cost affective manner with the open source framework OpenERP. The implementation model of ITFlux ensures that the implementation is completed in matter of weeks. This enables the enterprises to leverage the various ERP Modules to the fullest.

15

A string instance is immutable. You cannot change it after it was created. Any operation that appears to change the string instead returns a new instance: string foo = "Foo"; down// returns a new string instance instead of changing the old one vote string bar = foo.Replace('o', 'a'); string baz = foo + "bar"; // ditto here
accept ed

Immutable objects have some nice properties, such as they can be used across threads without fearing synchronization problems or that you can simply hand out your private backing fields directly without fearing that someone changes objects they shouldn't be changing (see arrays or mutable lists, which often need to be copied before returning them if that's not desired). But when used carelessly they may create severe performance problems (as nearly anything if you need an example from a language that prides itself on speed of execution then look at C's string manipulation functions). When you need a mutable string, such as one you're contructing piece-wise or where you change lots of things, then you'll need a StringBuilder which is a buffer of characters that can be changed. This has, for the most part, performance implications. If you want a mutable string and instead do it with a normal string instance, then you'll end up with creating and destroying lots of objects unnecessarily, whereas a StringBuilder instance itself will change, negating the need for many new objects. Simple example: The following will make many programmers cringe with pain: string s = string.Empty; for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { s += i.ToString() + " "; } You'll end up creating 2001 strings here, 2000 of which are thrown away. The same example using StringBuilder: StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { sb.Append(i); sb.Append(' '); } This should place much less stress on the memory allocator :-) It should be noted however, that the C# compiler is reasonably smart when it comes to

strings. For example, the following line string foo = "abc" + "def" + "efg" + "hij"; will be joined by the compiler, leaving only a single string at runtime. Similarly, lines such as string foo = a + b + c + d + e + f; will be rewritten to string foo = string.Concat(a, b, c, d, e, f); so you don't have to pay for five nonsensical concatenations which would be the nave way of handling that. This won't save you in loops as above (unless the compiler unrolls the loop but I think only the JIT may actually do so and better don't bet on that).

The String object is immutable. Every time you use one of the methods in the System.String class, you create a new string object in memory, which requires a new allocation of space for that new object. In situations where you need to perform repeated modifications to a string, the overhead associated with creating a new String object can be costly. The System.Text.StringBuilder class can be used when you want to modify a string without creating a new object. For example, using the StringBuilder class can boost performance when concatenating many strings together in a loop. You can create a new instance of the StringBuilder class by initializing your variable with one of the overloaded constructor methods, as illustrated in the following example. VB Dim MyStringBuilder As New StringBuilder("Hello World!") [C#] StringBuilder MyStringBuilder = new StringBuilder("Hello World!");

Setting the Capacity and Length

Although the StringBuilder is a dynamic object that allows you to expand the number of characters in the string that it encapsulates, you can specify a value for the maximum number of characters that it can hold. This value is called the capacity of the object and should not be confused with the length of the string that the current StringBuilderholds. For example, you might create a new instance of the StringBuilder class with the string "Hello", which has a length of 5, and you might specify that the object has a maximum capacity of 25. When you modify the StringBuilder, it does not reallocate size for itself until the capacity is reached. When this occurs, the new space is allocated automatically and the capacity is doubled. You can specify the capacity of the StringBuilder class using one of the overloaded

constructors. The following example specifies that the MyStringBuilder object can be expanded to a maximum of 25 spaces. VB Dim MyStringBuilder As New StringBuilder("Hello World!", 25) [C#] StringBuilder MyStringBuilder = new StringBuilder("Hello World!", 25); Additionally, you can use the read/write Capacity property to set the maximum length of your object. The following example uses the Capacity property to define the maximum object length. VB MyStringBuilder.Capacity = 25 [C#] MyStringBuilder.Capacity = 25; The EnsureCapacity method can be used to check the capacity of the current StringBuilder. If the capacity is greater than the passed value, no change is made; however, if the capacity is smaller than the passed value, the current capacity is changed to match the passed value. The Length property can also be viewed or set. If you set the Length property to a value that is greater than the Capacity property, the Capacity property is automatically changed to the same value as the Length property. Setting the Length property to a value that is less than the length of the string within the current StringBuilder shortens the string.

: What is the Main difference between String and StringBuilder and why do we use StringBuilder. 0 Answer String bulider Can Be Used # 1 When More Than One String Can

Dinesh Sharma

we concatenated. StringBuilder which is more efficient because it does contain a mutable string buffer. .NET Strings are immutable which is the reason why a new

string object is created every time we alter it (insert, append, remove, etc.). StringBulider Is more Effiecent Then String B'Cuse It Provide Some Standered Function like Append,Reverse,Remove etc.
Is This Answer Correct ?

143 Yes

19 No

Re: What is the Main difference between String and StringBuilder and why do we use StringBuilder. 0 Tharaknlr Answer Strings are immutable means # 2 Data value maynot be Changed [Xyz]

and Variable value may be changed. StringBuilder performs is faster than Strings. and also designed for Mutable Strings we can use like this System.text.StringBuilder
Is This Answer Correct ?

73 Yes

20 No

Re: What is the Main difference between String and StringBuilder and why do we use StringBuilder. 3 Answer String are Immutable (Not Sandeep # 3 Modifiable). If you try to Soni

modify the string it actually creates a new string and the old string will be then ready for

garbage collection. StringBuilder when instantiated, creates a new string with predefined capacity and upto that capacity it can accodomate string without needing to create a new memory location for the string....i mean it is modifiable and can also grow as and when needed. When the string needs to be modified frequently, preferably use StringBuilder as its optimized for such situations.
Is This Answer Correct ?

86 Yes

8 No

Re: What is the Main difference between String and StringBuilder and why do we use StringBuilder. 3 Answer Both String and StringBuilder Anandha # 4 are classes used to Kumar T

handle the strings. The most common operation with a string is concatenation. This activity has to be performed very efficiently. When we use the "String" object to concatenate two strings, the first string is combined to the other string by creating a new copy in the memory as a string object, and then the old string is deleted. This process is

a little long. Hence we say "Strings are immutable". When we make use of the "StringBuilder" object, the Append method is used. This means, an insertion is done on the existing string. Operation on StringBuilder object is faster than String operations, as the copy is done to the same location. Usage of StringBuilder is more efficient in case large amounts of string manipulations have to be performed.
Is This Answer Correct ?

64 Yes

14 No

Re: What is the Main difference between String and StringBuilder and why do we use StringBuilder. 3 Answer String class is immutable, Vijay # 5 means we can not change the Rana

contents of string at run time, for example String s1="loin"; string s2=s1.insert(3,"g"); now s2 have the value login ,but one thing to notice here is that we are not assigning this value into s1, because it is not possible in String class ,but if we want to change the contents of s1 then we will have to take the StringBuilder calss because with the help of this

class we can change the contents of same string examlpe: String s1="loin"; s1=s1.insert(3,"g"); now s1 is "login" here we are assigning the value again in s1, this is the main difference between in string and stringBuilder class
Is This Answer Correct ?

37 Yes

23 No

Re: What is the Main difference between String and StringBuilder and why do we use StringBuilder. 0 Mahesh Answer String and StringBuilder Both # 6 are classe for store the

strings. String Builder is faster than String. String is immitable, StringBuilder is mutable.
Is This Answer Correct ?

22 Yes

12 No

Re: What is the Main difference between String and StringBuilder and why do we use StringBuilder. Answer Difference.. # 7 String..

1.Its a class used to handle strings. 2.Here concatenation is used to combine two strings. 3.String object is used to concatenate two strings. 4.The first string is combined to the other string by creating a new copy in the memory as a string object, and

then the old string is deleted 5.we say "Strings are immutable". String Builder.. 1.This is also the class used to handle strings. 2.Here Append method is used. 3.Here, Stringbuilder object is used. 4.Insertion is done on the existing string. 5.Usage of StringBuilder is more efficient in case large amounts of string manipulations have to be performed