Sie sind auf Seite 1von 243

Stormwater and Flood Control

System Assessment and Utility Plan


Northampton, Massachusetts
Department of Public Works

Volume II
Final Report
Appendices
May 2012

Appendix A
Field Inspection Memoranda and Photographs


Memorandum
To:

File

From:

Mike Nelson

Date:

12/2/10

Subject:

Bridge Street/Meadows Area Field Visit

On Tuesday November 30th 2010, CDM conducted a field survey of the Williams Street Brook
drainage system in Northampton, MA. The purpose of the visit was to inspect the system,
identify design points for modeling, verify connectivity at specific locations, inspect the outfall,
and add any missing data found during the visit to the GIS maps. The weather was dry and cold
but the ground was not frozen at the time of inspection. The following is a summary of the
findings. Pictures of the system (referred to in the text) are provided.

The systems outfall was located on the bank of the Mill River near the WWTP
entrance. The 24-in concrete pipe was about 30 percent filled with silt and sediment.
It was also observed that the Mill River was highly silted in, as evidenced by the large
culvert under the WWTP entrance driveway. This culvert was almost 50percent full
of sediment with a berm of sediment off to one side, possibly spoils from previous
dredging. The outfall pipe was structurally intact, but had no headwall or erosion
control.

A wetland/brush area was located behind Montview Avenue, where the drain travels
cross-country. The drain in this area was TV-inspected by the City. These tapes
should be reviewed to assess the condition of the pipe below the levee.

Above the levee a valve enclosure was found about 30 ft past the toe of the levee. It is
used during flood events to close the pipe. Several inlets were also located along with
a network of drainage ditches in this wooded area. The ditches appear to convey
stormwater from upstream field areas during high flow events. Two of these ditches
end at 8-in VC pipe inlets connected to the 24-in drain. These inlets may act as relief
for the drain during peak flows and also allow flooded areas to drain after peak flows.
A small detention basin was located adjacent to the church parking lot off Pomeroy
Terrace. The basin seems to be inadequately sized and has irregular grading. Also
located in this area was a second, parallel drain (15-in) which has not been

Document code

Bridge Street/Meadows Area Field Investigation


12-2-10
Page 2

abandoned, but may be collapsed in some sections. It is believed this drain connects
to the main line in the same area as the drainage ditches.

Some missing information was identified around Hawley Street, including a 15-in
drain on Hawley Street from the intersection of Hancock Street, a 12-in HDPE drain
on Bixby Court (to unknown location), and a 12-in RC drain from Butler Place to
Hawley Street. The GIS infomation in this area was also confirmed to be correct at the
intersection of Pomeroy Terrace and Phillips Street.

It was confirmed that there is no pipe on Bridge Street between Grant Avenue and
Elizabeth Street.

It was confirmed that there is no connection to the cross-country drain on Lincoln


Avenue.

The 42-in outfall near the rail-trail bridge over the Connecticut River (Damon Road)
was inspected. The outfall area is highly deteriorated. Upstream of this system, a
MassDOT manhole was inspected and found to be in excellent condition (bike path
and Damon Road area).

The area around the Three County Fairgrounds was inspected, including Fair Street,
Old Ferry Road, and Cross Path Road. Several parcels possibly suitable for
stormwater detention were identified behind the Fairground stables and adjacent to
the park on Old Ferry Road. The owners of these parcels should be identified.

A drainage ditch in poor condition was inspected along Cross Path Road. The ditch
would be more effective if extended to Fair Street and cleared of trees and brush, and
possibly dredged. This ditch would convey stormwater downstream to the wooded
area where the network of drainage ditches was located.

Finally, several documents were obtained from the DPW, including TV inspection
videos and logs of the 24-in trunk drain. In addition, the final Weston & Sampson
report for this area was obtained for review. Still to be obtained is the Fairgrounds
Report from Berkshire Engineering.

Document code


Memorandum

To:

File

From:

Mike Nelson

Date:

12/16/10

Subject:

King Street/Market Street/Downtown Field Visit

On Tuesday December 7th, 2010, CDM conducted a field survey of the King Street/Market
Street/Downtown drainage system in Northampton, MA. The purpose of the visit was to inspect
the system, identify design points for modeling, verify connectivity at specific locations, inspect
outfalls, and add any missing data found during the visit to the GIS maps. The weather was dry
and cold, but the ground was not frozen at the time of inspection. The following is a summary of
the findings. Pictures of the system (referred to in the text) are provided.

This system has two outfalls, a 60-in circular concrete pipe located under the railroad bridge
off Hockanum Road, and a 66-in circular concrete pipe located behind the apartments on
Randolph Place near the bikeway. Both outfalls discharge to the Historic Mill River. While the
river bed has significant sedimentation, the outfalls had less than 20 percent sediment at the
ends of the pipes.

The Historic Mill River bed was inspected between the two outfalls in the area of Pleasant
Street, Service Centre Road, and behind Maple/Wilson Ave. A 60-in circular culvert connects
the two sections of river bed on each side of Pleasant Street. The inlet of this culvert was
clogged with debris (e.g., branches). It was observed that boards had been placed in the pipe
inlet to act as a bar rack or screen. It appears to be preventing debris from migrating into the
pipe, but it also appears to have created an obstruction just outside the pipe.

The Historic Mill River bed from Maple Avenue to the WWTP provides a significant amount of
storage. Eight- to twelve-foot deep banks line each side of the stream with a varying
floodplain between the banks, with widths ranging from 20 to 80 ft.

The field crew met with DPW staff to discuss some specific areas where localized flooding had
occurred in a recent storm. These areas were: the North Street underpass between Market and
King Street; condominiums on Gothic Street (flows from State Street migrating through
property), and State Street at Stoddard Street.
Document code

King Street/Market Street/Downtown Field Investigation


12-16-10
Page 2

On North Street, it appears that two catch basins at the low point of the underpass connect
directly to the old Market Street culvert and flooding may be due to catch basin maintenance
issues. Also a 24-in concrete drain running down North Street to the Market Street culvert was
discovered. The origin of this pipe is unknown. A manhole in King Street was opened to
determine if the 24-in drain was connected to the King Street culvert, but no connection could
be seen in the manhole.

Stoddard Street is experiencing flooding from backwater coming from the swamp behind Stop
& Shop. Heavy beaver activity has caused water to pool upstream of the wetlands sediment
trap and migrate through homeowners yards into the street along the side of the bikeway. The
crew also inspected the outlet of the swamp/wetland on Barrett Street where a large beaver
dam has impeded water from exiting the wetland into the outlet stream and raised the water
level of the wetland significantly (see pictures).
State Street is experiencing localized
flooding near Trumbull Road. Stormwater is
rising above the curb and running down the
driveway of a large residential property on
State Street through to the condominiums on
Gothic Street. The stormwater is flowing
down the handicap ramp on the north side of
the condominium building and accumulating
in the depressed entrance area in the front of
the building. The City believes the drain on
State Street is undersized, allowing water to
surcharge above the curb. Catch basin
cleaning is needed on State Street.

In this area it was noted that the RC drain from Gothic Street to King Street no longer exists and
now runs down Allen Place.

The two trunk drain lines in the King Street system have an interconnection at Main Street
(Rte. 9) underneath the railroad bridge. This interconnection was inspected by CDM and DPW
staff. It was confirmed that the old culvert (carrying sanitary and storm flows) located in the
Fitzwillys parking lot was abandoned. The new interconnection is located in the shoulder of
Main Street near the entrance to Fitzwillys parking lot. The King Street culvert enters the
structure as a 66-in pipe and exits as a 60-in pipe. A 36-in relief pipe is set at a higher elevation
(invert elevation is on record drawings) and connects to the Market Street culvert. The 36-in
pipe enters the Market Street culvert at a catch basin under the railroad bridge. It is unclear if
stormwater ever flows from the Market Street culvert back to the King Street line, or if it only
functions as an overflow relief pipe during surcharge of the King Street system. In addition,

Document code

King Street/Market Street/Downtown Field Investigation


12-16-10
Page 3

record drawings indicate that the Market Street culvert changes size and shape numerous
times in this area as it flows south across Main Street.

The Marshall Street neighborhood was inspected last. The DPW informed CDM that the RC
drain between Hubbard and Marshall Streets was replaced by a new 24-in drain running down
Swan Street. The potential for using the drainage ditches along the bike path (under I-91) was
explored and may not be a feasible option. Heavy clearing would be needed along with
drainage infrastructure upgrades directly beneath I-91. There may be potential for storage
between the bike path and the intersection of Crosby and Marshall Streets. There is a clear
open corridor between Bates Street and the dead end of Crosby Street. There is potential for a
drain line to run through here, minimizing impacts to Rte. 9.

Document code

Williams Street Brook Outfall

Old Mill River at William Street Brook Outfall

Inlet/Outlet for Stormwater Channels (Off Pomeroy Terrace)

Stormwater Channel

King Street Outfall #1

Old Mill River at King Street Outfall #1

King Street Outfall #2 at Old Mill River

State Street Runoff Towards Condos


Memorandum
To:

File

From:

Mike Nelson, Julie Gagen

Date:

12/30/2010

Subject: Elm Street Brook and Ryan Road/Austin Circle Areas Field Visit,
Wednesday 12/22/2010
On Wednesday, December 22, 2010, CDM conducted a field survey of the Broughtons
Brook/Elm Street Brook drainage system and a problem area in the Ryan Road/Austin Circle
area in Northampton, Massachusetts. The purpose of the visit was to verify GIS connectivity,
confirm pipe and culvert sizes, survey system conditions, identify design points for system
modeling, as well as system low points / areas prone to flooding.

Antecedent weather was dry, with sunny conditions and temperatures around 35 degrees (F)
at the time of inspection. The ground had started to freeze at the time of inspection, with
several wetland areas already iced over.

The following is a summary of the findings. Pictures referred to in the text are provided at
the end of this memorandum.
Elm Street Brook Area

The stormwater retention pond located adjacent to Federal Street, south of the
Northampton High School athletic fields is fed by a 36-in HDPE drain originating on
Elm Street. At the time of the inspection there was no base flow entering the pond.
The pond is an elongated kidney shape, allowing better treatment with its length. A
riprap emergency spillway is located on the east side, discharging to Broughtons
Brook. The wetland filter plants have been replaced by small trees and brush, and the
pond needs maintenance.

There is natural floodplain (low wooded areas) along the north and east sides of the
retention basin, which allows additional water storage before flooding the athletic
fields or Federal Street.
Elm Street Brook crosses underneath Federal Street and empties into the Mill River.
The box culvert under Federal Street is in poor condition. Headwalls on both sides

Document code

Elm Street Brook and Ryan Road/Austin Circle Areas Field Investigation
12-16-10
Page 2

show advanced degradation; concrete has chipped away to expose a significant


amount of rebar. See attached photos. The culvert dimensions are approximately 60in wide by 36-in high, and the water depth was approximately 3-in. At the
downstream side, there is a 12-inch drop from invert to stream, and the height of the
road above the stream invert is 76 inches. On the upstream side, the height of the road
above the stream invert is 81 inches.

If flooding were to occur at this location, 60 Federal Street would be affected before
any other structure, or before the road is flooded. The house abuts the brook at a 90
degree bend in the channel that runs from the Federal Street culvert to the Mill River.
The channel is about 10 feet wide, and 4 to 5 feet deep.

There are two outfalls directly downstream of the Federal Street culvert. One 36-in
flared end outfall from the retention pond; and a 15-in outfall from northwest on
Federal Street. This outfall was steadily flowing at the time of inspection and some
riprap from the mouth of the outfall had been pushed into the channel.

The crew inspected Broughtons Brook between the retention pond and the high
school. The stream has sediment accumulation, with sand bars occurring in
numerous spots causing braided flow in the channel. The stream channel originates
at a 12-ft by 8-in deep pool at an outfall on the southeast edge of the high school track.

Two sections of Milton Street were inspected. At the intersection with Ormond Drive,
in-line catch basins were inspected. Drainage on this road consists of 10-in clay pipes,
in fair condition. No clogging was observed.

There is a low-lying wooded area to the southwest of the intersection of Milton Street
and Ormond Drive, behind the houses. The map identified this area as a stream,
which outlets to manholes at the Ormond Drive intersection. However, the area is a
wooded area mostly filled with yard waste. No pipe outlet was observed in this area,
although there was base flow entering the Milton Street system from this direction.

At the intersection of Elm and Milton Street, Broughtons Brook is piped under Elm
Street /the high school grounds, reemerging south of the track. The base flow of the
brook is taken by a 48-in concrete flared end inlet (later transitions to HDPE and back
to concrete). No blockages were present during the time of inspection; however,
some large branches were found in the downstream manhole near the high school
parking lot. A relief 36-in concrete flared end inlet is set at a higher invert elevation
than the 48-in pipe.
On Riverside Drive, two catch basins were inspected just east of the intersection with
Milton Street and Elm Street. Both were in good condition, but drains were old 10-in

Document code

Elm Street Brook and Ryan Road/Austin Circle Areas Field Investigation
12-16-10
Page 3

clay pipes. The inlet to an 8-in cross country drain coming from behind houses along
Elm Street was blocked with yard waste and filled with sediment. The ditch that
conveys stormwater to this inlet has completely filled in with thorny vegetation and
small trees, losing all of its depth, and is merely a slight depression filled in with
leaves and other yard waste.

Nutting Avenue was identified as being a flood-prone area. The drainage system on
Nutting Avenue seems to be new and well done. Drainage from a field (and wetland
area) to the west of Nutting Avenue enters the system at the northern end of Nutting
Avenue. This connection is fed by a shallow grassed swale running parallel to Nutting
behind the homes bordering the field. The swale is about 6- to 8-foot wide and about
4-in deep at its deepest point. This swale most likely overtops, even in small rain
events, and floods these yards. Access to the swale (for improvements) is easily
obtained through the field.

The connection from the swale to the municipal system on Nutting is not typical. A
catch basin in a residence lawn is located approximately 4 feet below the road surface,
An opening in the curbing causes runoff from the road to be directed into that catch
basin. This most likely causes flooding in this homeowners yard. A solution would be
to replace the catch basin with a manhole and install curbing along the road. A catch
basin could be installed in the road and easily directed into the drain.

At Hospital Road, Broughtons Brook passes through a culvert with an upstream wing
wall. Along the upstream side, the box culvert is 4-ft by 8-ft; from stream invert to the
ground surface is a distance of 6 ft.

Hospital Road has a steep incline with a small stream originating from an elevated
retention pond (up on the hill) and marsh area at the base. At the top of the hill, the
eastern parking area contains a number of unmapped drains and catch basins which
drain to the large retention pond.

Broughtons Brook flows in an open channel along the northern side of Elm Street.
The stream is well established with vertical banks about 3-ft deep. The stream is very
close to the shoulder of Elm Street. In some locations, a guard rail has been installed
as a barrier between the travel lanes and the brook. Bank stabilization may be
needed here in the near future. There is very little grade change between the top of
the stream channel, Elm Street, the bottom of Hospital Road, and the houses on the
south side of Elm Street. Once the brook overtops, there is no barrier for flood
protection.
Upstream of this section, Broughtons Brook veers off away from Elm Street towards
the Vocational Schools land. Downstream of the Vocational School dirt road, which

Document code

Elm Street Brook and Ryan Road/Austin Circle Areas Field Investigation
12-16-10
Page 4
has a corrugated metal culvert, is a low-lying, sunken forest-type floodplain. This area
offers several flood control options that should be explored for the following reasons.

This area has virtually no potential for property loss due to flooding. There is
one structure on Elm Street well above the floodplain area.

There is no impact to the Vocational Schools orchard at this location. If the


area upstream of the culvert were selected for flood storage, the orchard
would flood periodically. In addition, the culvert would not need to be
replaced.

There is a natural bowl area that could be flooded with a natural bottleneck on
the downstream side. This would provide opportunity for minimal earthwork
when creating retention.

Upstream of this area there is further sunken forest


type floodplain and a large gully leading to the
Vocational Schools fields. This area would also be
suitable for flood storage, but would be less desirable
for the Vocational School as its fields, paths, and
orchard would be impacted. It should be noted that the
tributary drainage area to the small stream channel on
Elm Street is sizeable. Much of it is rolling terrain, with
little development but is very wet (i.e., streams,
wetlands, floodplain). It appears the downstream
retention pond is too far downstream. The flooding
problems originate much further upstream.

Two streams wind their way through the Vocational


School fields. The main branch is fed by a large
concrete culvert under Rte. 9. This culvert is 15 to 20
feet under Rte. 9 and there is no potential for roadway
or any structure flooding at this location. The
downstream side of the culvert has two openings: a
rectangular box culvert, 30-in by 50-in, and a 36-in circular culvert. Base flow was
conveyed by the box culvert at the time of the inspection. There was a large crack in
the headwall from the top of the 36-in pipe to the top of the headwall.

North of Rte. 9 is a state-owned lot, once used as a yard for transportation equipment
and materials. This lot is mostly wetlands. The stream was located; however, only
one inlet was located: a 36-in circular culvert carrying the base flow of the stream.
Document code

Elm Street Brook and Ryan Road/Austin Circle Areas Field Investigation
12-16-10
Page 5

Further upstream the brook is conveyed under the elevated bike trail through a small
stone culvert. On the other side of the bike trail, the brook winds through a heavily
wooded and wetland area adjacent to the Meadow Brook Apartments. At this point,
the brook is quite small and fed by several detention ponds within the apartment
complex. The final inspection for this system was a 24-in concrete (circular) culvert
underneath Bridge Street carrying a small amount of base flow from a heavily
wooded, undeveloped area north of Bridge Street

Ryan Road/Austin Circle Area

There is a drainage ditch between Austin Circle and the elementary school on Ryan
Road that is prone to flooding. This ditch receives storm flows from the Matthew
Drive area, and is very flat. The natural water course before development appears to
have been in the opposite direction. The channel is very shallow but expanding into
residents yards.

While inspecting the area, the field crew was approached by several residents who
were concerned about the drainage problems in this area. Some residents have
successfully stopped erosion and channel expansion by laying down decorative
crushed stone in the channel. Yard waste is being used as a barrier between yards
and the channel. There was also a large frozen puddle near the back path to the
school. Long-time residents claimed the amount of water seen in the area now is
unprecedented.

Further downstream in the channel there are siltation issues at culvert crossings at
Brierwood Drive and Acrebrook Drive. These sections of channel are in need of
sediment removal.

Document code

Federal Street Culvert

Downstream Wingwall

Downstream Wingwall

Upstream Wingwall

Upstream End of Culvert

Blockage Upstream of Culvert

Brush and Sandbars Obstructing Brook at High School

Sandbars in Brook

Drain Manhole at Ormond Drive and Milton Street

Clogged Catch Basin on Milton Street

Catch Basin at 2 Nutting Ave.

Asphalt Sluiceway

Inlet at Nutting Ave.

Swale Behind Nutting Ave.

Inlet Behind Riverside Dr

Swale Behind Riverside Drive

Channel Constriction at Elm St

Ponding Behind School at Austin Circle

Austin Circle Swale Upstream of Inlet

Swale at Inlet

Swale Downstream of Inlet

Flood Control System Levees


Memorandum
To:

Virginia Roach

From:

Tyler C. Dunn
Michael P. Smith

Reviewed by: Stephen L. Whiteside


Date:

May 25, 2011

Subject:

City of Northampton
Stormwater and Flood Control System Assessment and Utility
Planning
Levee Assessment

Introduction
CDM was retained by the City of Northampton, Massachusetts to develop an inventory and
condition assessment of the Citys existing stormwater and flood control system. The purpose
of the project is to meet specific goals of the Sustainable Northampton Comprehensive Plan,
as well as to implement a new Sustainable Water Management Utility to fund capital projects
and maintenance of the citys stormwater and flood control facilities.
The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the condition of the key elements of the
flood control facilities based on a general walk-through inspection, and to evaluate the
present condition of the levee and appurtenant structures to provide information that will
assist in both prioritizing levee repair needs and planning/conducting operation and
maintenance.
The condition assessment of the levee flood control system included the following scope:

Collect and review available reports, including U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
design drawings and reports, inspection reports, operation and maintenance documents,
and other available plans and design information for the flood control structures pertaining
to the levee and appurtenant structures;
Perform a visual inspection of the levee system;
Prepare a memorandum summarizing the assessment of the levee system, including
recommendations.

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 2

Background Information
General

The flood protection levee system consists of two main parts on each side of the city. The
eastern part of the system includes an earth embankment about one mile long that provides
flood protection against rising waters of the Connecticut River. The western part of the
system includes earth embankment segments and a concrete flood wall designed to protect
against rising waters and flash floods from the Mill River and backwater from a diversion
canal linked to the Connecticut River originating at the Ox Bow Lake. Construction of the
flood protection system was started in December 1938 and was completed in June 1941. The
following paragraphs describe the systems based on a review of the record drawings, the
operations and maintenance manual, and other references. Elevations that are presented were
taken from the documents referenced to Mean Sea Level Datum and converted to NAVD 88
datum. To convert from MSLD to NAVD 88, subtract 0.67 ft.

East Levee Flood Control System


The flood protection levee system is an earthen fill levee as shown on Figures A-1 and A-2.
The levee is approximately 4,950 feet long and has a maximum height of about 23 feet. The
width of the crest is about 10 feet. The earth embankment starts at the intersection of Pomeroy
Terrace and Hancock Street and continues southeasterly and crosses Venturers Field Road.
Beyond Venturers Field Road crossing, the embankment has an approximate 75-degree bend
and the alignment extends southwesterly and crosses Hockanum Road and meets the pump
station at the old Mill River. The pump station is a brick building structure containing three
48-inch diesel-driven pumps. From the pump station, the earth embankment bends slightly
toward a westerly direction and crosses the Boston & Maine Railroad tracks and then Route 5.
Concrete retaining walls/abutments are constructed at the RR crossing and the highway
crossing and function as stop-log structures during a potential flood event. Stop-logs are
stored in corrugated metal storage houses constructed next to the crossings. The earth
embankment extends westerly beyond Route 5 approximately 500 feet where the
embankment is in contact with the natural earth high ground. The design and record
drawings show that the core of the embankment is constructed with a random soil material.
The embankment material river-side of the core is an impervious clay-like blanket material,
and a sandy pervious material is shown land-side of the core. A description of the key
elements of the system is discussed below.

Crest
Based on the record drawings, the crest of the levee was shown to be generally 10 feet wide
with an 8-foot-wide gravel surface and grass-covered edges. The crest of the levee generally
was constructed at an elevation of about El. 131.6 to El. 131.3.

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 3

River-side Slope
Based on the record plans, most of the river-side slope of the levee was presented as a 2.5
horizontal : 1 vertical (2.5H:1V) slope, and a 3H:1V slope at the segment between Ventures
Field Road and Hockanum Road. The slope surface has 6 inches of topsoil and is grass
covered except in some limited areas. The slope is protected with a one-foot layer of riprap for
about 1,000 feet on the embankment curve beyond the Ventures Field Road crossing, and on
the embankment between the pump station and the B&M railroad crossing. The upper limit
of the riprap is shown to reach El. 129.6, or about 1.8 feet below the crest surface.

Land-side Slope
Most of the land-side slope of the levee was shown to be a 2H:1V slope, and a 3H:1V slope at
the segment between Ventures Field Road and Hockanum Road. At the ground surface, a 12inch-thick layer of topsoil and grass covers the embankment pervious fill. A toe drain system
consisting of 8-inch to 15-inch porous concrete pipe in gravel bedding filtered trenches exists
below grade along most of the embankment toe of slope. Intermittent manholes are installed
to service the toe drain system. The toe drain system collects the seepage water through the
levee fill and discharges to the storm sewer system.

Stop-log Closure Structures


The East Levee system has closure structures at the crossing of highway Route 5 and the B&M
railroad. These structures are used to install timber stop-logs at each crossing to form a
vertical wall to close the openings and protect against flow from rising flood water from the
south. The structures are vertical reinforced concrete walls that serve as retaining walls for the
levee embankment fill at each side of the travel way of the crossings. A vertical slot is formed
in the exposed face of each wall to retain the ends of the rectangular timber stop-logs. Since
the span across the travel way is wide, additional support and strengthening of the stop-logs
is provided by steel frames and diagonal struts secured to special anchorages below the
roadway pavement or RR ballast. The openings of these special anchorages are normally
covered with secured steel plates. The timber stop-logs and metal fittings are stored in
corrugated sheet metal sheds off to the side of the travel way openings. The sheds are
mounted on rail wheels and can be rolled on a track to expose the materials for ready access.

Pump Station
The Northampton Pump Station was built across the old Mill River to remove stormwater
and treated effluent from the land-side portion of the East Levee when the water in the river
rises. The pumping station is a brick building that was constructed between two earth
embankments with interconnecting concrete counterfort flood walls. Stormwater runoff
discharges into the old river bed at several locations upstream of the pump station. As the
flow in the old river reaches the pump station, stormwater is normally discharged by gravity
through an open 6-foot X 8-foot conduit at the base of the pump house building. Pumping
operations from inside the building are performed with four separate pumps, which include
three 48-inch propeller pumps (two gas-powered, one diesel-powered) and a 16-inch electric

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 4
pump. The pump station building also includes engine batteries, an emergency generator,
electrical and manual gate controls, and other appurtenances. The pump station is operated
when the Connecticut River rises to a flood stage when open channel flow through the
rectangular conduit cannot occur. A sluice gate is closed in the conduit and the pumping
system is activated. The pumps discharge the water through the flap valve closures on the
discharge pipe outlets to the Mill River which flows southerly to the Connecticut River.
Bar/trash racks protect the pump inlet chambers from large debris at the river side of the
building.

West Levee Flood Control System


The flood protection levee system consists of earthen fill levee segments and a concrete flood
wall as shown on Figures B-1 through B-5. The levee/floodwall system is approximately 2,300
feet long. The width of the crest is about 10 feet. The system begins with the contact of the
earth embankment with the natural earth abutment and high ground near Paradise Pond just
northeast of the Paradise Pond Dam, and adjacent to College Lane on the property of Smith
College. The embankment extends southerly, parallel with the east bank of the Mill River for
about 1,100 feet to the crossing at West Street. The embankment is about 16 feet high with a
crest elevation of about El. 146. A concrete T flood wall extends southerly from West Street
to the current bike path bridge crossing, formerly the New York, New Haven & Hartford
Railroad. The concrete flood wall is about 450 feet long and contacts the stone abutment of the
bridge of the former RR. Most of the length of the wall is about 10 feet above ground surface
with a top elevation of about El. 140. The top of the wall and stop-log structure at the West
Street south curb is about El. 145.3 to match the elevation of the levee and stop-log retaining
wall at the north curb. A concrete flood wall and an earth embankment with slight curvature
extend from the former RR crossing abutment in a southerly direction about 900 feet to the
natural earth abutment and high ground at Hebert Avenue. This last earth embankment
segment serves as a dam which permitted the Mill River to be diverted into the Diversion
Canal.
The construction of the pumping station at the East Levee involved the diversion of the Mill
River which originally flowed through the city. Flows originating from the upstream Mill
River were diverted into the new diversion canal which was used to direct the flow to the old
Connecticut River Ox Bow, currently called Ox Bow Lake. The diversion route made it
necessary to close Grove Street and to build a new bridge with drop structure where the canal
crossed South Street.
A description of the key elements of the system is discussed below.

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 5

Crest
Based on the record plans, the crest of the levee segments was shown to be generally 10 feet
wide and grass-covered. The crest of the levee segment north of West Street generally was
constructed at elevations ranging from El. 145.5 to El. 144.8. The crest of the levee segment
south of the bridge of the former RR crossing was constructed at an elevation of about El.
139.1.

River-side Slope
Based on the record drawings, the river-side slope of the northerly levee segment was
presented as a 2.5H:1V slope. The levee segment south of the flood wall was built with a
3H:1V slope to the end at Hebert Avenue. The slope surface is protected with a one-foot layer
of hand-placed riprap. The upper limit of the riprap on the slope of the northerly levee
segment is shown to be about one foot below the level of the crest. The upper limit of the
riprap of the levee segment south of the floodwall is shown to be El. 137.1, or about 2 feet
below the crest surface.

Land-side Slope
Most of the land-side slope of the levee was shown to be a 2H:1V slope. At the ground
surface, a 12-inch-thick layer of topsoil and grass covers the embankment fill. A toe drain
system consisting of 8-inch to 10-inch porous concrete pipe in filtered trenches exists below
grade along most of the embankment toe of slope. Intermittent manholes are installed to
service the toe drain system.

Concrete Flood Wall


The flood wall is constructed between West Street and the former RR bridge. The north end of
the flood wall is constructed as part of the stop-log structure at West Street. The south end of
the wall is constructed in contact with the stone block abutment of the former RR bridge. A
short length of wall is constructed on the south side of the RR abutment and transitions to the
earthen levee. The wall is a reinforced concrete cantilever type vertical wall. A steel sheetpile
seepage cutoff wall was installed below the footing of the cantilever wall for the length of the
walls. The bottom of the cutoff wall is generally at El. 105. A toe drain system is constructed
below the ground surface on the land-side portion of the wall to collect seepage water. Flow
from the toe drain discharges into the existing storm drain system or the river.
A concrete retaining wall extends along the east bank of the Mill River to support the higher
ground between the flood wall and the river. The record drawings indicate several
penetrations through the wall which may have been utilized for drainage. Some have been
abandoned and few still exist. Near the east abutment of the West Street bridge, two cast iron
flap valves are secured into the face of the concrete retaining wall. One flap valve is
positioned about 2 feet higher than the other, and to the left. One flap valve was noted on the
record drawings as a 20-inch cast iron outlet. It is believed that this lower outlet is a drain
from the stormwater system. The purpose of the other drain could not be identified. The

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 6
record drawings also indicate a 1-foot-square opening labeled as the Propper-McCallum
outlet exiting the retaining wall further to the south. This opening served as a drain operated
with a gate valve for the basement of the former Propper McCallum Silk Hosiery Co. which is
currently the Smith College Physical Plant. A March 2006 revision update to the Local
Emergency Flood Plan by the Northampton Emergency Management Department indicated
that the piping is not connected inside the building and that two high-water events in 2005
did not show an effect in the building.

Stop-log Closure Structures


The West Levee system has one closure structure at the crossing of West Street. This structure
is very similar to the two closure structures at the East Levee. The structures are vertical
reinforced concrete walls. Only one wall functions as a retaining wall for the levee
embankment fill at the north side of West Streets travel way. The opposite wall at the south
side of the travel way is attached to the concrete T flood wall. A vertical slot is formed in
the exposed face of each wall to retain the ends of the rectangular timber stop-logs. Timber
stop-logs are installed across the crossing to form a vertical wall to close the travelway and
protect against flow from rising flood water from the Mill River just west of the levee. Since
the span across the travel way is wide, additional support and strengthening of the stop-logs
is provided by steel frames and diagonal struts secured to special anchorages below the
roadway pavement. The openings of the special anchorages are normally covered with
secured steel plates on the road surface. The timber stop-logs and metal fittings are stored in a
utility trailer at the Department of Public Works city yard located on Locust Street which is
about two miles northwest of the West Street crossing.

West Street Pumping Station


A small pump station on the land-side of the flood wall was observed during the field
inspection. This pump station was not part of the original design and was not shown on the
record drawings. A description of the pump station is provided below under the field
inspection section.

Drop Structure at South Street Bridge


The drop structure was constructed as part of the new channel which diverted the Mill River
to permit flow into the Ox Bow. This required the construction of a new bridge at the
relocated South Street. The drop structure is beneath the bridge and consists of an ogee
concrete weir about 6 feet high. The abutment walls of the bridge form the sides of the drop
structure, and a center pier supports the mid-span of the bridge deck. The drop structure is
constructed of reinforced concrete and forms the bed of the new channel for a length of about
125 feet. The drop height over that distance from the weir to the downstream end is about
15 feet.

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 7

Diversion Channel
The diversion channel begins at the southern portion of the West Levee. The channel extends
downstream about 2,900 feet to the weir of the drop structure beneath the South Street Bridge.
In this portion, the channel bottom is about 35 feet wide, with channel side-slopes constructed
as 3H: 1V slopes. The bottom and side-slopes are lined with stone riprap. Downstream of the
drop structure, the channel grade is relatively flat with some definition of side slopes. The
channel extends about an additional 8,000 feet beyond the end of the drop structure to the
discharge point at Ox Bow Lake. Hulberts Pond forms the basin area prior to discharging to
the Ox Bow.

Field Inspection
General

CDM representative Tyler C. Dunn made a site visit on December 22, 2010 to perform a
general visual inspection of the levee system. A more-detailed inspection and evaluation of
the levee system was performed for the USACE in December 2010. Mr. Dunn was
accompanied by Mr. Felix Harvey, Assistant Civil Engineer with the City of Northampton. At
the time of the inspection, the weather was partly cloudy to overcast with the temperature
about 32F. There was no snow cover on the ground. Photographs to document the current
condition of the East Levee were taken during the inspection and are included in Appendix
A, and the photograph locations are shown on Figures A-1 and A-2. Photographs to
document the current condition of the West Levee were taken during the inspection and are
included in Appendix B, and the photograph locations are shown on Figures B-1 through B5. For convention, reported observations, photographs, data, and documented features on the
figures in this memorandum are referenced to stationing along the crest centerline based on
the 1951 Flood Emergency Mobilization Plans and the record drawings (design drawings
1939) dated 1949.
In general, the levee systems were found to be in very good condition. Only isolated areas
were noted to have deficiencies that would usually be corrected with normal maintenance
practices. In general, the deficiencies included:

Few trees and thick brush are growing near the toe of the river-side slopes of the levee
and at the river-side face of the concrete flood wall at isolated areas.
Ruts, small depressions were observed on the crest of the earth embankments.
The grass on the crest of the earth embankments was worn by foot traffic exposing bare
soil to potential erosion.
Isolated area of missing riprap on the slope of the diversion canal near the end of the West
Levee.
Potential clogging of the toe drain system as reported by recent USACE inspection.

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 8
The specific observations are identified in the sections below. However, it should be noted
that a detailed inspection of all elements of each of the two levee systems was not performed.
General observations were made and the documentation of the existing condition of elements
and features are recorded in the photographs. Other potential deficiencies may not have been
observed during the general inspection.

East Levee System


Abutments
Abutment contacts with the earthen fill levee portions are generally in very good condition.
No significant settlement of the crest surface was observed and slope faces appeared to be
consistent with the design. Contacts at the natural earth abutments at the north (Photo No. 1
& 3) and south (Photo No. 48 & 49) ends of the levee appear to be consistent with the design
and no fill separation, surface cracking, or erosion was observed. Contacts at the retaining
walls forming the stop-log structures also appeared to be intact with no settlement or fill
separation observed at the concrete/embankment fill interface (Photo Nos. 36, 37, 38, 40, 41,
42). The embankment surfaces had a healthy growth of grass.

Crest
The crest of the levee generally appears flat and level. One small area of the crest surface
appeared uneven and slightly lower at the location of the farm vehicle path near the natural
abutment near Eastern Avenue (Photo Nos. 8, 9, 10). Some small woody vegetation was
observed growing at the path location on the crest and the river-side slope. This should be
removed. The edges of the crest surface were grass-covered and the centerline portion of most
of the crest was generally bare exposing the granular fill surface (see many of the East Levee
photos). The lack of grass cover is attributed to pedestrian traffic. No significant erosion of
the bare areas was evident, but the grass cover should be restored and maintained.

River-side Slope
The river-side slope of the levee generally was in good condition. The slope appeared to be
even and consistent in plane with no obvious signs of erosion or sloughing. Most of the riverside slope is grass covered and recently mowed. Some segments of the slope are protected
with riprap. Minor amounts of brush were seen growing from the riprap edges or between
stones (Photo Nos. 15, 32, 35). This brush should be cut on a regular basis. Some areas along
the toe of the slope have woody vegetation and brush (Photo Nos. 9, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20, 45),
which should be cut back to 15 feet from the toe of slope.

Land-side Slope
The land-side slope of the levee generally was in good condition and covered with a healthy
growth of grass. The slope appeared to be even and consistent in plane with no obvious signs
of erosion or sloughing. Some brush or woody vegetation was encountered in only a few
areas at or near the toe of the slope (Photo No. 22, 26, 33, 34). The brush and trees should be

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 9
cut back to a distance of 15 feet from the toe. Brush was seen growing around some of the toe
drain manholes (Photo Nos. 22, 26), and should be cut to maintain manholes for access. The
toe drain system should be inspected to identify any areas where sediment could be collected
within the porous pipes. It is suggested that an internal video investigation be performed and
that the sediment encountered be removed to maintain the function of the toe drain. Some
rutting of the slope surface was seen on the earth embankment segment between B&M RR
crossing and the Route 5 crossing (Photo No. 39). This rutting should be filled with proper fill
and covered with loam and seeded to restore the slope plane and the grass cover.

Stop-log Closure Structures


The retaining walls forming the stop-log closure structures appeared to be in good condition.
The formed slot in each concrete wall was clear and unobstructed. Painted graffiti was noted
on the faces of the concrete walls at the B&M RR crossing (Photo Nos. 36, 37, 38). The base
anchorage locations for mounting the framing for support of the stop-logs could not be seen
because of the railroad ballast. It is recommended that these locations be identified and
cleared for access if possible. No concrete deterioration or graffiti was present at the Route 5
structures (Photo Nos. 41, 42, 43). The base anchorage openings in the pavement were
covered with pavement or concrete (Photo No. 43). The cover plates that would normally
protect the openings were not seen. These openings should be cleared of the asphalt or
concrete and restored to the design access function. The stop-logs were housed in the
corrugated metal sheds (Photo Nos. 36, 37, 39, 41) and were not observed.

Pump Station
The exterior of the pump station appeared to be in good condition (Photo Nos. 27, 28, 29, 30,
31) with no signs of structural distress. The interior was not observed during this abbreviated
inspection.

West Levee System and Diversion Canal


Abutments
Abutment contacts with the earthen fill levee portions are generally in very good condition.
No discernable settlement of the crest surface was observed and slope faces appeared to be
consistent with the design. Contacts at the natural earth abutments at the north, adjacent to
College Lane of Smith College (Photo No. 1 & 2), and the south transition to the higher
ground at Hebert Ave. (Photo No. 34) appear to be consistent with the design. No fill
separation, surface cracking, or erosion was observed. The contacts at the retaining wall
forming the stop-log structure at the north curb of West Street also appeared to be intact with
no settlement or fill separation observed at the concrete/embankment fill interface (Photo
Nos. 7, 9, 11, 12). The embankment surfaces had a healthy growth of grass.

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 10

Crest
The crest of the levee generally appears flat and level. The crest surface is grass-covered with
some flattened grass slightly bare ground due to foot traffic. No erosion of the bare areas was
evident, but the grass cover should be restored and maintained (Photo Nos. 1, 7, 9, 10, 33,
34, 35).

River-side Slope
The river-side slope of the levee generally was in good condition. The slope appeared to be
even and consistent in plane with no obvious signs of erosion or sloughing. Practically the
entire river-side slope is protected with riprap (Photo Nos. 4, 6, 8, 12, 31, 32, 35). A small area
along the toe of the slope has some woody vegetation and trees (Photo No. 4) which should
be cut back to about 15 feet from the toe of slope. Some small area of trees and woody growth
was observed near the toe of the slope at the south end of the embankment near the transition
to the diversion channel (Photo No. 32). This growth should be cut back to a distance of 15
feet from the toe.

Land-side Slope
The land-side slope of the levee was in good condition and covered with a healthy growth of
grass. The slope appeared to be even and consistent in plane with no obvious signs of erosion
or sloughing. Some trees and woody vegetation were observed behind the flood wall near the
toe of the slope (Photo No. 30). Any brush or trees should be cut back to a distance of 15 feet
from the toe. The toe drain system should be inspected to identify any areas where sediment
could be collected within the porous pipes. It is suggested that an internal video investigation
be performed and that the sediment encountered be removed to maintain the function of the
toe drain.

Concrete Flood Wall


The concrete flood wall was found to be in good condition. The concrete did not appear to
have any discernable stress or corrosion on either side of the wall Photo Nos. 13, 17, 18, 19, 20,
21, 23, 25, 26, 29). Some brush, woody vegetation and trees were growing near or adjacent to
the face of the wall (Photo Nos. 22, 24, 27, 30). This vegetation should be removed to a
distance of 15 feet from the base of the wall. Some vine growth was observed on the land-side
face of the wall (Photo Nos. 19, 21, 25). The vine growth should be removed and controlled.
The ground surface behind the land-side portion of the wall is paved and is part of the Smith
College physical plant (Photo Nos. 18, 23, 25, 26). A road-salt storage hut is located at the
south end of the land-side face of the flood wall adjacent to the abutment of the former RR
(Photo No. 25). It is recommended that this structure and the salt be removed or relocated,
and the face of the wall be inspected for deterioration.

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 11
Woody vegetation was observed behind and on the river-side face of the concrete retaining
wall along the east bank of the river in front of the flood wall (Photo Nos. 14, 15, 16, 20). This
vegetation was growing close to the two cast iron flap valves observed on the north end of the
retaining wall face (Photo No. 49) near the east abutment of the West Street bridge. The lower
flap valve was not sealed properly and should be repaired or replaced. Some spalling and
deterioration of the concrete was observed in the limited area. The remaining retaining wall
should be inspected to note areas of deterioration, and proper repairs should be performed.
Additionally, any perforations or pipe conduits through the wall should checked for potential
transmission of flood water flow. If the conduits are not needed for drainage, then the
conduits should be sealed or plugged.

Pump Station
The West Street pumping station is located adjacent to the West Street crossing on the landside of the concrete flood wall. This pump station was installed several years after the
completion of the West Levee System. The exterior of the building and the piping for the
pump operation appeared to be in good condition. The pump station is a small 12-foot X 9foot concrete block structure with a wood-framed roof. The pump station draws water from
the stormwater collection system through a 6-inch steel suction pipe that extends vertically
above the ground surface and horizontally into the building. Pumped water is discharged
through a galvanized steel 6-inch pipe. The discharge pipe rises to the top of the flood wall
and down the river-side face of the flood wall where it discharges onto a bituminous
pavement pad that permits flow towards the river. The pump is powered by propane fuel.
Interior inspection of the building was not performed.

Diversion Canal and Drop Structure


Three small portions of the diversion channel were observed during the general inspection.
An overall view of the channel was performed at the beginning where the channel has been
constructed adjacent to the south portion of the levee near Hebert Avenue (Photo No. 32, 35,
36). The channel in this area was generally in good condition. There was some riprap from the
west bank that had been displaced (Photo No. 36). This riprap protection should be restored.
The second area of the channel that was observed was north of the drop structure. This area
was generally in good condition. Some brush and woody vegetation were observed along the
channel banks on some portions of the side slopes (Photo Nos. 37, 38, 39, 40). This vegetation
should be cut and the cuttings removed to avoid displacement of riprap. The channel banks
on the north side of the drop structure and the South Street bridge also included some woody
vegetation that should be cut and removed (Photo Nos. 41, 42). The channel banks on the
south side of the drop structure and the South Street bridge included some woody vegetation
that should be cut within 15 feet of the concrete structures (Photo Nos. 43, 44). The banks of
this portion of the channel and the remaining length to the discharge point are not protected
with riprap. However, much growth of woody vegetation was prevalent. Periodic inspection
of the channel along this 8,000 foot length should be performed and fallen trees and brush
that could obstruct the channel should be removed. The predominance of trees and woody

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 12
vegetation is shown along the edges of Hulberts Pond (Photo No. 45). The discharge point
into Ox Bow Lake includes a temporary bridge crossing that is currently closed (Photo Nos.
46, 47) and an existing concrete box culvert (Photo No. 48).

Accreditation
For flood control projects to be recognized by FEMA on the NFIP maps, adequate evidence
must be provided showing the flood control system provides reasonable assurance that
protection from the base flood exists in accordance with CFR 65.10. The accreditation process
with respect to the stability of the earthen embankment levees and flood walls includes:

A topographic survey of the system to confirm system geometry and the 3-foot freeboard
requirement;
A subsurface exploration program to evaluate the composition and in-situ strength of
embankment and foundation materials;
Evaluating erosion protection from currents and/or wave action;
Embankment and foundation stability and seepage analyses of the earthen embankments
in accordance with USACE EM-1110-2-1913, Design and Construction of Levees;
Stability and seepage analyses of the flood walls in accordance with the USACE Phase II
Interim Guidance for Evaluating Existing I-Walls, dated October 25, 2006;
Settlement evaluations to assess the potential and magnitude of loss of freeboard.

Below is a brief summary of the current status or information regarding the above studies.

Topographic Survey
The as-built records from the 1940s appear to be the most recent survey of the levee system.

Freeboard Evaluation
As part of this assessment a preliminary comparison of the flood control system crest
elevations and the 100-year flood elevations was performed. Based on the record drawings
and the FEMA FIRM for Northampton, the flood control systems have sufficient freeboard
above the 100-year base flood elevation as shown in Table 1. It should be noted that for a 500year storm event, freeboard is reduced to 1.5 feet at some locations.

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 13

Embankment and Foundation Conditions


The record drawings indicate a general composition of the foundation materials and less often
the density. The specifications provided grain-size curves for the embankment materials,
however, the in-place density of the soil or degree of compaction is unknown. Based on the
record drawings, the subgrade appears to have been prepared prior to placing the
embankment fill, however, there are no backfill records to confirm.

Erosion Protection
The river-side slope of the east levee system is primarily grass covered and the river-side
slope of the west levee system is protected with a one foot layer of hand-placed riprap. No
evaluations are available for the embankment erosion protection.

Stability and Seepage


No design calculations are available for the stability and seepage of the earthen embankment
and flood wall. In addition, the condition of the toe drains is currently unknown.

Settlement
The record drawings indicate the crest grades shown were built up to account for up to 0.75
feet of settlement. No other settlement calculations are available for the levee system and the
effect of potential pipe collapses have not been evaluated.
Additional studies in accordance with CFR 65.10 also include, but are not limited to, a specific
O&M plan, interior drainage study, documentation of flood warning system, and
maintenance plans and criteria.

Recommendations
Based on the visual inspection, the following recommendations are discussed below.

Additional Studies
This section identifies studies that should be completed to evaluate concerns.

Update the Operation and Maintenance Manual. This manual should include inspection
schedules, operational and maintenance procedures required to ensure satisfactory
operation of the levee system to reduce the potential for deterioration to the facility.
If accreditation of the flood control levee system is pursued, follow the general guidelines
outlined above in accordance with CFR 65.10.

Recurrent Maintenance Recommendations


This section discusses those activities that should be undertaken on a regular or yearly basis.
Typically these activities are recurrent maintenance level activities that can be undertaken by
the owner and do not require engineering design.

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 14

Regular maintenance activities should be performed at least twice a year or as conditions


warrant from the Spring to Fall seasons to control and limit growth of vegetation on the
levee and the banks of the diversion channel.
Monitor areas for dislodged riprap, and replace riprap stones to protect exposed
embankment soils.

Recommendations, Maintenance and Minor Repairs


This section presents recommended activities to improve the overall condition of the levee
that do not alter the current design. These recommendations may require design by a
professional engineer, application for applicable permits, and construction by a contractor
experienced in levee repair. If modifications to the levee system are planned in the future,
some of the following activities should be performed in conjunction with the upgrades.

Cut and clear trees and thick brush on the levee and at least 15 feet beyond the abutments
and at the toe of the levee. Removal of the trees greater than 4 inches in diameter and any
planned excavation of roots should be designed by a qualified levee/dam engineer. Holes
should be filled with low-permeability fill on the river-side slope and compacted fill on the
land-side slope.
Remove burrowing animals and backfill holes with compacted fill.
Repair areas of sparse vegetation on the crest and land-side slope. Establish a healthy stand
of grass to prevent future erosion.

Closing
The findings and recommendations have been prepared for the levee system assessment in
the City of Northampton, Massachusetts as understood at this time and described in this
memorandum. The recommendations are based on information provided to CDM and the
limited observations made at the time of the inspection. The recommendations have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices. No other warranty,
express or implied, is made. A more-detailed inspection and evaluation of the levee system
was performed for the USACE in December 2010. The results of that inspection may provide
additional recommendations and details for maintenance, repairs, and certification
requirements for the levee systems.

Virginia Roach
May 25, 2011
Page 15
Attachments:
Table 1 Summary of Levee Crest and Base Flood Elevations
Figure 1 Site Location Aerial Map
Figure 2 Levee Assessment General Plan
Appendix A East Levee System Photographs and Photograph Location Plans
Appendix B West Levee System and Diversion Canal Photographs and Photograph
Location Plans
Appendix C FEMA FIRM Maps

City of Northampton, MA
Stormwater and Flood Control System Assessment and Utility Planning
Table 1
Summary of Levee Crest and Base Flood Elevations
Station

Crest El. (1)


(ft - MSLD 29)

Crest El. (3)


(ft - NAVD 88)

Base Flood El. (2)


(ft - NGVD 29)

Base Flood El. (3)


(ft - NAVD 88)

East Levee Flood Control System


0+00
132.5
131.8
125.0
124.3
5+00
132.4
131.8
125.0
124.3
10+00
132.3
131.7
125.0
124.3
12+92
125.0
124.3
14+00
132.3
131.6
124.8
124.1
17+00
132.2
131.6
124.1
123.5
17+66
124.0
123.3
20+00
132.2
131.5
123.2
122.5
20+59
123.0
122.3
24+90
132.1
131.4
123.0
122.3
30+25
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
36+05
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
36+80
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
36+86
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
37+46
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
38+21
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
39+04
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
39+10
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
39+50
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
42+39
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
42+70
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
44+44
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
44+93
49+50
132.0
131.3
123.0
122.3
West Levee Flood Control System
0+00
153.0
152.3
134.0
133.3
0+71
146.2
145.5
134.0
133.3
2+80
134.0
133.3
5+00
145.9
145.3
133.7
133.0
10+00
145.6
144.9
133.1
132.4
10+47
133.0
132.3
11+57
145.5
144.8
132.5
131.8
12+03
146.0
145.3
132.3
131.6
12+28
140.1
139.5
132.1
131.5
12+55
132.0
131.3
12+68
140.1
139.4
132.0
131.3
13+08
140.0
139.3
131.8
131.2
13+48
139.9
139.2
131.7
131.0
13+88
139.8
139.1
131.6
130.9
14+28
139.7
139.1
131.4
130.8
14+68
139.6
139.0
131.3
130.6
15+05
139.5
138.8
131.2
130.5
15+37
139.5
138.8
131.1
130.4
15+55
137.8
137.1
131.0
130.3
16+24
131.0
130.3
131.0
130.3
16+37
137.8
137.1
16+43
139.8
139.1
131.0
130.3
23+50
139.8
139.1
130.0
129.3
Notes:
1. Crest elevations from USACE record drawings for Northampton Dike, dated December 1938 to June 1941.
2. Base flood elevations interpreted from FEMA FIRM Map No. 2501670002A, Effective Date: April 3, 1978.
3. To convert from NGVD 29 to NAVD 88, subtract 0.67 ft (0.204 m).

Freeboard (ft)
7.5
7.4
7.3
7.5
8.1
9.0
9.1
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
19.0
12.2
12.2
12.5
13.0
13.8
8.0
8.1
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.4
6.8
6.8
8.8
9.8

PROJECT LOCATION

consulting engineering construction operations

N
WEST LEVEE SYSTEM

EAST LEVEE SYSTEM

consulting engineering construction operations

Appendix A
East Levee System Photographs and
Photograph Location Plans

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-1

Photo No. 1: Land-side East Levee contact at natural abutment at about Sta. 1+00, from
end of Eastern Ave.

Photo No. 2: Land-side East Levee looking up-station (SE) at about Sta. 2+50, from end of
Eastern Ave.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-2

Photo No. 3: Crest of East Levee transition to natural abutment, near end of Eastern Ave.

Photo No. 4: Crest of East Levee looking up-station (SE) from about Sta. 2+50 near the
end of Eastern Ave.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-3

Photo No. 5: Crest and land-side slope of East Levee from about Sta. 3+50.

Photo No. 6: East Levee land-side slope. Note manhole at toe of levee at about Sta. 4+75
that services a 24 in. storm sewer utility that crosses beneath levee.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-4

Photo No. 7: East Levee land-side slope looking toward natural abutment near Eastern
Ave. Note manhole for 24 in. storm sewer.

Photo No. 8: Crest of East Levee looking toward natural abutment at Eastern Ave. from
about Sta. 6+50.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-5

Photo No. 9: Crest and river-side slope of East Levee looking toward natural abutment at
Eastern Ave. from about Sta. 10+00.

Photo No. 10: Crest and land-side slope of East Levee looking toward natural abutment at
Eastern Ave. from about Sta. 10+00.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-6

Photo No. 11: Crest and river-side slope of East Levee looking toward Ventures Field
Road crossing from about Sta. 10+00.

Photo No. 12: Crest and river-side slope of East Levee looking toward Ventures Field
Road crossing from about Sta. 13+00.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-7

Photo No. 13: Crest and land-side slope of East Levee looking toward Ventures Field Road
crossing from about Sta. 12+50.

Photo No. 14: Crest of East Levee looking up-station (SE) from Ventures Field Road
crossing.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-8

Photo No. 15: River-side slope of East Levee looking up-station (SE) from Ventures Field
Road crossing.

Photo No. 16: Land-side slope of East Levee looking up-station (SE) from Ventures Field
Road crossing.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-9

Photo No. 17: Curved portion of river-side slope of East Levee looking up-station from
about Sta. 18+00.

Photo No. 18: Curved portion of land-side slope of East Levee looking up-station from
about Sta. 18+00.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-10

Photo No. 19: Crest and river-side slope of East Levee looking up-station toward
Hockanum Road crossing from about Sta. 22+00.

Photo No. 20: Crest and river-side slope of East Levee looking down-station from about
Sta. 25+20). Note termination of riprap on the slope at about Sta. 24+90.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-11

Photo No. 21: Crest and land-side slope of East Levee looking down-station from about
Sta. 26+00.

Photo No. 22: Crest and land-side slope of East Levee looking up-station toward
Hockanum Road crossing from about Sta. 22+00. Note two toe-drain manholes.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-12

Photo No. 23: Crest and land-side slope of East Levee looking down-station toward
Hockanum Road crossing from about Sta. 34+00.

Photo No. 24: Crest and river-side slope of East Levee looking down-station toward
Hockanum Road crossing from about Sta. 34+00.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-13

Photo No. 25: Crest and river-side slope of East Levee looking up-station toward pumping
station from about Sta. 32+00.

Photo No. 26: Crest and land-side slope of East Levee looking up-station toward pumping
station from about Sta. 32+00.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-14

Photo No. 27: Crest and land-side slope of East Levee looking up-station at pump station
from about Sta. 36+50.

Photo No. 28: River-side slope of East Levee looking up-station at pump station and Mill
River discharge from about Sta. 36+50.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-15

Photo No. 29: River-side face of pump station and concrete transition walls to levee,
looking up-station.

Photo No. 30: River-side face of pump station with three 48 in. discharge conduits, looking
up-station.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-16

Photo No. 31: Pump station and river-side slope looking down-station.

Photo No. 32: Crest and river-side slope looking up-station toward B&M RR crossing
from about Sta. 40+50.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-17

Photo No. 33: Crest and land-side slope looking up-station toward B&M RR crossing from
about Sta. 40+50.

Photo No. 34: Crest and land-side slope of East Levee looking down-station toward pump
station from about Sta. 41+50.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-18

Photo No. 35: Crest and river-side slope of East Levee looking down-station toward pump
station and Mill River discharge from about Sta. 41+50.

Photo No. 36: Crest and land-side slope of East Levee looking up-station toward B&M RR
crossing from about Sta. 41+50.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-19

Photo No. 37: East Levee concrete retaining wall/stop log structure at B&M RR crossing,
looking up-station, with river-side slope on left.

Photo No. 38: East Levee concrete retaining wall/stop log structure at B&M RR crossing,
looking down-station at crest and land-side slope toward pump station.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-20

Photo No. 39: Land-side slope of East Levee looking down-station toward B&M RR
crossing from about Sta. 44+50.

Photo No. 40: Crest and river-side slope of East Levee looking down-station toward B&M
RR crossing from about Sta. 44+50.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-21

Photo No. 41: East Levee and retaining wall/stop log structure at US Rte 5 crossing
looking down-station from about Sta. 45+00.

Photo No. 42: East Levee and retaining wall/stop log structure at US Rte 5 crossing
looking up-station from about Sta. 44+50.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-22

Photo No. 43: East Levee and retaining wall/stop log structure at US Rte 5 crossing
looking up-station.

Photo No. 44: Crest and river-side slope of East Levee looking up-station toward natural
abutment from about Sta. 45+00.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-23

Photo No. 45: Crest of East Levee looking down-station toward US Rte 5 crossing from
about Sta. 47+50, near natural abutment.

Photo No. 46: River-side slope of East Levee looking down-station toward US Rte 5
crossing from about Sta. 48+00, near natural abutment.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-24

Photo No. 47: Land-side slope of East Levee looking down-station toward US Rte 5
crossing from about Sta. 48+00, near natural abutment.

Photo No. 48: East Levee looking down-station toward US Rte 5 crossing from about Sta.
49+50, at natural abutment contact.

Northampton East Levee System Connecticut River


December 22, 2010
Page A-25

Photo No. 49: East Levee looking up-station at natural abutment contact at about Sta.
49+50.

consulting engineering construction operations

consulting engineering construction operations

Appendix B
West Levee System and Diversion Canal
Photographs and Photograph Location
Plans

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-1

Photo No. 1: West Levee contact at natural abutment adjacent to College Lane, looking
up-station from about Sta. 0+50.

Photo No. 2: West Levee looking up-station from about Sta. 1+75, toward natural
abutment adjacent to College Lane.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-2

Photo No. 3: Crest and land-side slope of West Levee looking up-station from natural
abutment adjacent to College Lane.

Photo No. 4: Crest and river-side slope of West Levee looking up-station from natural
abutment adjacent to College Lane.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-3

Photo No. 5: Crest and land-side slope of West Levee looking up-station from about Sta.
5+00.

Photo No. 6: Crest and land-side slope of West Levee looking up-station from about Sta.
5+00.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-4

Photo No. 7: Crest and land-side slope of West Levee looking up-station toward West
Street crossing from about Sta. 6+00.

Photo No. 8: River-side slope of West Levee looking up-station from about Sta. 6+00.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-5

Photo No. 9: Crest and slopes of West Levee looking up-station toward West Street
crossing from about Sta. 9+50.

Photo No. 10: Crest and slopes of West Levee looking down-station from about Sta. 10+00.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-6

Photo No. 11: Retaining wall and stop-log structure of West Levee at about Sta. 11+50 at
north curb of West Street crossing, looking down-station. River-side slope at left.

Photo No. 12: Retaining wall, stop-log structure, and river-side slope of West Levee at
about Sta. 11+50 at north curb of West Street crossing, looking west from crest.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-7

Photo No. 13: Beginning of concrete flood wall and stop log wing wall structure at about
Sta. 12+00 at south curb of West Street crossing, looking up-station from West Levee crest
at about Sta. 11+50.

Photo No. 14: River-side face of concrete flood wall with stop log wing wall structure to the
left at about Sta. 12+00 at the south curb of West Street crossing.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-8

Photo No. 15: River-side face of concrete flood wall just south of West Street crossing.

Photo No. 16: Mill River parallel to and south of river-side flood wall (on left) between
West Street crossing and the railroad crossing, looking south from West Street.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-9

Photo No. 17: River-side face of concrete flood wall looking up-station from about Sta.
12+20 just south of West Street crossing.

Photo No. 18: Land-side face of concrete flood wall looking up-station from about Sta.
12+50 south of West Street crossing.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-10

Photo No. 19: Land-side face of concrete flood wall on left looking down-station from
about Sta. 12+70 toward West Street crossing.

Photo No. 20: River-side face of concrete flood wall looking down-station from about Sta.
13+00 toward West Street crossing.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-11

Photo No. 21: Land-side face of concrete flood wall looking down-station from about Sta.
13+00 toward West Street crossing.

Photo No. 22: River-side face of southern portion of concrete flood wall looking up-station
from about Sta. 14+00 toward former RR crossing.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-12

Photo No. 23: Land-side face of concrete flood wall looking up-station from about Sta.
13+80 toward former RR crossing.

Photo No. 24: River-side face of south end of concrete flood wall from about Sta. 14+80
looking up-station toward former RR crossing.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-13

Photo No. 25: Land-side face of south end of concrete flood wall from about Sta. 14+70
looking up-station toward former RR crossing. Note salt storage hut in contact with face of
wall.

Photo No. 26: Land-side face of concrete flood wall from about Sta. 14+70 looking downstation toward West Street crossing.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-14

Photo No. 27: South end of river-side concrete flood wall at about STA. 15+00 at contact
with stone abutment of bike-path (former RR crossing).

Photo No. 28: River-side face of stone abutment of former RR crossing. Flood wall contact
at Sta. 15+00 is shown beyond.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-15

Photo No. 29: River-side face of stone abutment, flood wall extension, and river-side slope
looking up-station from about Sta. 15+40.

Photo No. 30: Face of stone abutment and flood wall south extension transition to levee
looking down-station from levee crest at about Sta. 16+60.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-16

Photo No. 31: River-side face of flood wall south extension and slope looking up-station
from about Sta. 16+40.

Photo No. 32: River-side slope of West Levee looking up-station from about Sta. 16+40,
approximately at beginning of Mill River diversion canal.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-17

Photo No. 33: Crest and land-side slope of West Levee looking up-station from about Sta.
16+50.

Photo No. 34: Crest and land-side slope of West Levee looking up-station from about Sta.
20+50 toward natural abutment adjacent to Hebert Ave.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-18

Photo No. 35: Crest and river-side slope of West Levee looking down-station from about
Sta. 20+00 toward south end of flood wall and former RR crossing.

Photo No. 36: River-side slope of West Levee and Mill River diversion canal looking upstation from approx. levee Sta. 17+00 (approx. canal Sta. 0+75).

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-19

Photo No. 37: West slope of Mill River diversion canal from about canal Sta. 20+00
looking down-station toward direction of West Levee.

Photo No. 38: West slope of Mill River diversion canal from about canal Sta. 20+00
looking up-station toward direction of South Street Bridge drop structure.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-20

Photo No. 39: West slope of Mill River diversion canal from about canal Sta. 20+50
looking up-station toward direction of South Street Bridge drop structure.

Photo No. 40: West slope of Mill River diversion canal from about canal Sta. 25+00 looking
down-station toward general direction of West Levee.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-21

Photo No. 41: South Street bridge and canal drop structure looking up-station from
upstream canal Sta. 25+00.

Photo No. 42: South Street bridge and canal drop structure looking up-station from
upstream canal Sta. 26+75.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-22

Photo No. 43: South Street bridge and canal drop structure looking down-station from the
farm access road at about canal Sta. 30+90.

Photo No. 44: South Street bridge and canal drop structure looking down-station from the
farm access road at about canal Sta. 32+50.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-23

Photo No. 45: Lower end of Mill River diversion canal looking upstream toward Hulberts
Pond (down-station) from Old Springfield Road temporary bridge at about canal Sta.
107+85.

Photo No. 46: Discharge point of Mill River diversion canal flowing into Ox Bow Lake
beneath Old Springfield Road temporary bridge at about canal Sta. 107+85, looking north.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-24

Photo No. 47: Discharge area of Mill River diversion canal flowing into Ox Bow Lake
beneath Old Springfield Road temporary bridge at about canal Sta. 107+85, looking north.

Photo No. 48: Discharge area of Mill River diversion canal flowing into Ox Bow Lake
beneath Old Springfield Road temporary bridge at about canal Sta. 107+85, looking south.
Note 5 ft. x 7 ft. concrete culvert in foreground.

Northampton West Levee System Mill River and Mill River Diversion Channel
December 22, 2010
Page B-25

Photo No. 49: Flap valves at the retaining wall at the east bank of the Mill River near the
West Street bridge abutment.

consulting engineering construction operations

consulting engineering construction operations

consulting engineering construction operations

consulting engineering construction operations

consulting engineering construction operations

Appendix C
FEMA FIRM Maps

Flood Control System Pumping Station

From: Lof, Richard


Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 5:00 PM
To: Roach, Virginia
Subject: Northampton, Inspection of Pumping Stations
Ginny:
I met John Carver at the Northampton WWTP, and we proceeded with the inspection of the two storm
water pumping stations. John was most helpful.
We stopped briefly first at the Main Pumping Station located near the WWTP. This facility receives most
of the run-off from the lower portions of the City, from what used to be the termination of the Mill River.
At the time the pumping station was constructed, the Mill River was diverted to a new outlet farther
down the Connecticut River, such that the only flow that will be received at the Main Pumping Station will
be from the area between the dikes on the Connecticut River and Mill River.
The Main Pumping Station is little changed since the report done by Killam Assoc. in 1999. Most of the
issues presented in that report remain. Items particularly noted during our visit were as follows:
1. The report mentions that access for a mobile device to access the screens located at the inlet to
the facility was partially obstructed by overhead wires. The electric service entrance has been
modified, and the wires have since been removed. Thus, the overhead obstruction no longer
exists.
2. Even though the overhead obstruction was removed, access for a portable mechanical device to
reach the upstream face of the bar rack is poor because of the configuration of the screen
structure. The structure was built for manual removal. Screenings are removed when necessary
utilizing a truck mounted catch basin cleaner type grapple. Manual removal would be a difficult,
time consuming effort.
3. They would greatly prefer a mechanically cleaned screening device. There is an appearance a
mechanical screen might fit in place of the manual bar racks currently in place, however, in order
to remove very large debris (which sometimes can get all the way to the screens), a mechanically
cleaned screen should be set at a 60 degree angle instead of the steeper 75 to 80 degree setting
of the existing screens. A lower pitch screen may not fit into the existing structure as easily, or
at all.
4. Raising and lowering of the existing screens is a manual operation, and potentially dangerous.
The screens are left lowered in place throughout times of the year when the station may need to
operate, to minimize the number of times the screens are raised and lowered. This causes more
debris to be collected.
5. There are no reported problems with the pumping equipment and the drives, other than they
are recognized to be very old, and repair parts may be very difficult to obtain.
6. The single diesel engine that replaced one of the original gasoline engines is reported to be very
noisy inside the station.
7. Diesel fuel and gasoline are stored in buried tanks outside the building. I did not trace piping to
determine how the fuel is transferred from the tanks to the engines.

8. There is concern about the main sluice gate operator located inside the station, that is used to cut off
the gravity flow draining into the River, whether it is reliable in electric mode. It works in manual mode,
but would be very time-consuming to operate manually.
9. Similarly, there is concern there may be electrical problems with the other main sluice gate operator,
located outside the station, that diverts from to the main pump wet well.
10. Heat for the building is now provided by gas unit heaters fueled with natural gas. The original boiler,
located in the basement is no longer used.
11. The major issue at the station is that everything is manually operated, and must be monitored
continuously when operating and/or when expecting that operation may need to commence.
Additionally, during times of high river elevation, even when there is no storm run-off, the station must
be manned around the clock to allow monitoring of the drainage inlet to the station, and occasional
operation of the electric motor driven pump to pump down the inlet bay. During daytime, the operator
may be dispatched from the WWTP, but at times the WWTP is not manned, an operator must be present
(paid on overtime) at the Main Station. At the time of my visit, the Connecticut River is running high,
because of winter run-off farther north, requiring occasional operation of the electric motor driven pump.
The dilema is that the cost to automate will be very high, because anything to be automated must be
replaced with new equipment. The trade-off is to choose the better option, whether to automate to
reduce required manpower, but spend money on new equipment, pay personnel to manually operate the
existing old equipment.
12. There do not appear to be issues regarding the capacity of the station, although John noted that he
has observed the station to be in operation with all pumps running.
13. The engines and the right angle drives appear to have some lubricating oil leaks, some of which are
controlled by absorbant sheets.
The West St. Pumping Station is located near the Mill River adjacent to the crossing of West St., on the
protected side of the flood wall. The pumping station draws from a storm water collection system, and
pumps over the flood wall to discharge into the Mill River. The storm water collection system appears to
serve a limited area inside the flood wall, that is a low point for collection of storm run-off.
The pumping station is an on-grade structure, of CMU construction with a wood framed, asphalt singled
roof. The exterior dimensions of the building are approximately 12 ft X 9 ft. A wooden double door on
one end provides access to the interior. The building houses one engine driven self-priming type pump.
The vintage of the equipment suggests the station was built in the 1960's or '70's.
The pump is connected to the storm collection system by a 6 inch steel suction pipe that rises just
outside the building from a manhole. The pipe turns horizontal through the building wall, and connects
through a gate valve to the pump suction. The gate valve seemed stuck in which ever position it is
currently set. Being a non-rising stem valve, it's position (open or closed) was not obvious.
The pump discharges through a light wall galvanized steel pipe that exits the back wall of the station,
rises up and over the top of the flood wall, drops down the opposite side of the flood wall, and bends
horizontal to an outlet onto a bituminous spill pad that flows to the river. This is a very light duty piping
system.
The pump is direct driven by a spark ignited engine power unit fueled by propane. The Power Unit is
assembled by Hanlon Waters. The engine is a Ford automotive type engine, straight 6, likely rated on
the order of 100 hp, radiator cooled. Engine serial number is 192432. The hour meter shows 36 hours

of run time. There is no muffler on the exhaust discharge outdoors, so the engine is likely rather noisy
during operation. The doors must be left open during operation for ventilation.
The propane fuel tank is a 300 lb propane bottle located outside the station. A prolonged operating time
during cold weather may cause problems with the ability of the propane in the tank to vaporize fast
enough to keep the engine fueled at full power operation.
The pump is a Rex Chainbelt, 6 inch, self-priming pump, Serial Number NJ0284. Being a 6 inch pump,
the capacity is likely to be on the order of 800 to 1000 gpm. No rating data plate could be identified.
The engine is started and operated on a regular basis as normal preventive maintenance. A trickle type
battery charger keeps the starting batteries charged. The building has a short strip of electric heater
baseboard to maintain warmth inside. There is one interior light.
The ability of the station to pump water is unknown. It has not been used for the purpose of pumping
water for a very long time, if at all. The only way for it to demonstrate an ability to pump water is if the
Mill River rises to the point the collection system floods, or if the outlet of the collection system into the
river is plugged.
There are two nearby outlets of piped collection systems into the river, one higher than the other, both
built into the retaining wall along the river bank. Both have a cast iron flap valve. Both flap valves
appear to open freely. The lower of the two flap valves appears to be rather new, and utilizes a resilient
seat. The seat appers to have swollen to the point that the flap cannot close onto its seat. The flap
cannot be forced manually to full closure. Thus, high river elevation will result in flooding of the
collection system tributary to this flap gate. If this flap valve serves the same collection system as the
pump, the leakage may fully negate the capacity of the pumping station.
As noted above, during exercising, the pump does not pump water. It is not known if the pump contains
priming water to initiate pumping, or if water would need to be poured into the pump to initiate the
priming action. The collection system may be rather deep, which requires greater priming effort by the
pump, and/or may require that the collection system must surcharged nearly to street level before the
pump will prime up. The condition of the seals on the pump is not known. The configuration of the
suction pipe inlet in the collection system is not known.
Similar to the Main Station, this pump is also completely manually operated. If the station must be
operated, an operator must be on site at all times. Note in one of the photos, that a chair has been
provided. There is no monitoring of the collection system served by the pumping station, thus,
monitoring for flooding must depend upon monitoring of the Mill River canal and/or the Connecticut
River.
There are no obvious deficiencies at the station, but its ability to actually pump water if needed may be
questionable.
I will be pleased to discuss any questions you may have.
I will also download and forward photos.
Rick

Appendix B
Drainage Analysis

Summary Tables

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.1
Bridge Street/Meadows Area Drainage Analysis
Existing Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
2
1
Junction-A
Reach-1
FG2
FG5
E-Pond2
FG3
E-Pump
E-CP1
3
Junction-B
Reach-2
4
Junction-C
Reach-3
6
FG1
FG6
E-Pond1
FG4
E-CP2
5
Wetland
Reach-4
7
Junction-E
Reach-5
8

Location

Drainage
Area
(acres)
26.9
17.7
44.6

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


Tc

CN

20
20

84
70

20
25

80
74

Fairgrounds Site

10.9
3.4
21.5
13.5

20

73

Old Ferry Rd.

5.2

15

66

Fair St.

10.4

15

85

25
20
15

66
72
79

Pomeroy Terrace

38.7
20.7
0.7
24.8
7.5
32.3
25.0

30

80

Eastern Ave.

10.0

15

82

Valley St.

19.4

30

69

Lincoln Ave.
Bridge St.

Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

70

2-Yr
32.7
9.1
41.9
39.3
10.9
2.2
2.2
8.8
0.4
9.7
2
50.9
47
14.4
54.8
36.2
12.9
12.5
0.7
0.7
3.9
3.9
21.3
9.6
9.6
12
12.8
10.3
8

10-Yr
55.1
20.6
75.7
71.3
19.6
4.4
3.8
18.2
0.4
20.8
5.1
96
88.1
24
102.2
67.2
33.4
26.6
1.3
2.9
8.7
8.7
38.5
32.1
31.3
20.9
32.8
30.8
18.3

25-Yr
72.9
30.7
103.6
97.8
26.7
6.3
4.5
26.2
0.4
30
8.1
132.9
122
31.6
141.2
92.9
52.1
38.8
1.8
11
13
15.2
52.6
107.7
102.3
28.1
105.5
91.6
27.5

50-Yr
88.3
39.9
128.2
121.1
32.9
7.9
5
33.5
0.4
37.7
10.9
165.3
152.5
38.1
175.4
115.8
69.3
49.8
2.3
22.4
16.9
30.8
64.9
183.1
172.8
34.4
177.5
152.5
36.1

100-Yr
108.7
52.6
161.3
152.5
41.2
10.2
5.5
43.4
0.4
48.1
14.8
209.1
193.6
46.8
221.6
146.8
93.4
64.9
2.8
39.2
22.2
53.7
81.5
277.5
265.1
42.8
273.2
237.2
48

B-1
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.1 (Contd)
Bridge Street/Meadows Area Drainage Analysis
Existing Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
Junction-E2
9
10
Junction-F
Reach-6
11
G-Mill River
13
12
42-inch Pipe

Location

Drainage
Area
(acres)

Tc

CN

William St.
Henry St.

11.1
9.7

15
15

83
74

2.4

15

70

82.9
34.8
117.7

25
30

84
82

Industrial Dr.
Marshall St.

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


2-Yr

10-Yr

25-Yr

50-Yr

100-Yr

18.4
14.1
7.2
35.6
35.4
1.3
36.6

36.7
24.1
14.7
68.6
67.9
3
70.4

96.3
32.2
21.2
101.8
101.6
4.4
102.1

160
39.3
26.9
167.8
167.6
5.8
168.3

249.2
48.6
34.8
260.5
260.3
7.6
261.4

92.6
32.9
125.5

155.3
57.5
212.8

206.4
77.3
282.6

250.6
94.6
343.0

309.5
117.7
423.4

13.2
0.7
116.5
117.0
13.0
2.2
117.4
119.5
57.3
9.6
115.6
116.5

27.9
2.9
117.0
117.0
23.9
3.8
118.2
119.5
112.9
32.1
116.5
116.5

40.5
11.0
117.1
117.0
32.8
4.5
118.7
119.5
165.2
107.7
116.6
116.5

51.9
22.4
117.2
117.0
40.7
5.1
119.1
119.5
221.7
183.1
116.6
116.5

67.6
39.2
117.3
117.0
51.4
5.5
119.5
119.5
300.6
277.5
116.7
116.5

Flood Storage Routing


E-Pond1 (Inflow)
E-Pond1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
E-Pond2 (Inflow)
E-Pond2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
Wetland(Inflow)
Wetland(Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)

24.8

21.5

B-2
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.2
Elm Street Brook Area/Florence Area Drainage Analysis
Existing Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
A
Junction-1
B
Junction-2
C
Junction-3
D
E
F
Detention Basin 1 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)

Location
Bridge Rd.
Strawberry Hill Rd.

Straw Avenue

Drainage
Area
(acres)
27.1
54.8
27.7
73.0
18.2
113.9
6.8
3.1
31.0

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


Tc

CN

15

72

15

67

15

66

15
15
25

77
74
78

15
15
15

72
62
61

15

66

15

60

20

54

25
15

64
68

113.9

Junction-4
G
H
I
Junction-5
J
Detention Basin 2 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)

157.8
20.7
17.0
6.3
180.5
14.6

K
Junction-6
L
Junction-7
M
O

8.1
208.6
28.1
241.6
23.0
10.0

14.6

Depot Avenue

2-Yr

10-Yr

25-Yr

50-Yr

100-Yr

17.5
27.9
11.8
32.4
7.1
59.3
6.2
2.3
25.5
59.3
27
186.9
187.5

37.5
63.4
29
74.2
18
124.5
11.8
4.8
47.2
124.5
51.8
188.1
187.5

55
95.5
45.3
112.2
28.5
181
16.5
6.9
65.1
181
55.4
188.2
187.5

70.8
124.7
60.3
146.9
38.2
232.6
20.6
8.7
80.9
232.6
59
188.4
187.5

92.5
165.1
81.4
195
51.8
304.1
26.2
11.3
102.5
304.1
64.9
188.5
187.5

29.4
13.4
4.1
1.3
33.8
5.7
5.7
3.3
180.9
186

65.2
28.7
13
4.5
83
14.5
14.5
6
181.9
186

80.5
42.1
21.5
7.5
115.2
22.9
22.9
7.8
182.9
186

98.7
54.2
29.9
10.5
149.6
30.7
30.7
9.2
183.8
186

120.4
70.8
41.9
14.9
192.8
41.6
41.6
10.8
185.1
186

1.5
34.6
1.5
42.0
6.2
4.7

5.4
89
9.4
108.7
17.5
11.2

9.2
128.9
19.1
165
28.1
17.2

13
171.6
29.2
222.3
37.9
22.7

18.5
229.3
44.6
295.5
51.9
30.4

B-3
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.2 (Contd)
Elm Street Brook Area/Florence Area Drainage Analysis
Existing Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
Junction-8
P
Junction-9
Junction-10
Q
N
Junction-11
S
R
Junction-12
Junction-13
Junction-14
Junction-15
X
Y
W
V
U
T
48-36-in Diversion
36-in pipe Junction
CC
Z
DD
Junction-16
AA
Junction-17
EE
Junction-18

Location

Locust St.
North Main St.
South Main St.

North Elm St.


Hospital Rd.
Elm St.
South Main St.

Federal St.
Milton St.
Elm St.
48-inch Pipe

Drainage
Area
(acres)
257.9
16.3
49.3
307.3
26.4
23.0
374.3
49.4
17.6
459.1
478.1
509.5
535.0
17.0
8.5
31.4
19.0
68.4
16.4
535.0
4.4
76.5
23.2
4.4
549.2
14.3
565.2
16.0
585.1

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


Tc

CN

15

73

15
20

76
74

15
15

65
61

15
15
15
15
25
15

73
74
70
73
67
60

15
20
20

73
74
82

15

84

15

68

2-Yr
47.2
11.3
38
74.7
22.5
16
89.3
17.5
3.7
106.9
93.2
97.6
101.7
11.8
6.3
17.5
13.2
25.1
3
73.8
29.0
53.0
16.1
4.8
76.7
18.9
76.6
7.6
80.3

10-Yr
118.0
23.7
74.1
171.5
43.9
32.3
209.3
46.1
12.6
254.2
221.7
230.2
237.8
24.7
13
39.2
27.6
62.5
10.9
157.4
82.5
111.2
32.6
8.4
161.1
32
156.7
17.9
162.4

25-Yr
183.7
34.4
104.8
262.7
61.9
46.3
320.8
73.7
21
390.6
340
353.3
364.1
35.8
18.6
58.8
40.1
96.2
18.6
239.2
127.9
161.4
46.7
11.2
243.2
42.4
235
27.5
242.7

50-Yr
247.7
44.1
132.8
349.6
77.9
58.7
425.7
99.6
29.5
518.1
450.5
467.3
481.8
45.8
23.7
76.6
51.3
127.2
26.2
315.7
169.6
206.6
59.2
13.7
320.3
51.4
308.5
36.4
317.6

100-Yr
333.3
57.3
170.9
471.6
99.7
75.7
573.1
136.2
41.7
697.6
607.2
626.8
646.4
59.5
30.6
101.3
66.7
170.3
37.4
423.7
227
268.3
76.4
17
429.2
63.4
412.1
48.7
423.1

B-4
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.2 (Contd)
Elm Street Brook Area/Florence Area Drainage Analysis
Existing Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
BB
Junction-19
Detention Pond 3 (Inflow)
Detention Pond 3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
Sink-1

Location
Washington St.

Drainage
Area
(acres)
19.8
27.5
27.5

689.1

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


Tc

CN

15

86

2-Yr
28.8
27.2
27.2
26.9
148.2
153.55
123.6

10-Yr
47.3
82.2
82.2
75.7
150.3
153.55
261

25-Yr
61.9
126.3
126.3
104.3
152.4
153.55
376.8

50-Yr
74.4
167
167
150.2
154.0
153.55
485.6

100-Yr
91.1
223
223
210
154.8
153.55
664.3

B-5
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.3
King Street/Market Street/Downtown Area Watershed Drainage Analysis
Existing Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element

Location

Drainage Area

2-year
Tc

CN

10-year

25-year

50-year

100-year

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

95

46.8

5.0

56.7

6.1

70.4

4.8

82.1

9.1

97.7

83

31.8

3.0

41.6

3.9

55.4

3.5

67.4

6.4

83.4

78.3

8.0

97.8

10.0

125.2

4.2

148.7

15.4

180.0

52.5

4.9

66.6

6.3

86.5

3.9

103.6

9.9

126.2

(mi2)

(ac)

KS-E

0.0302

19.3

19

KS-F

0.0278

17.8

15

0.0580

37.1

0.0394

25.2

0.0580

37.1

73.3

8.0

91.6

10.0

117.2

4.2

139.2

15.4

168.4

0.0973

62.3

100.4

12.9

125.6

16.3

161.1

4.1

191.5

25.4

232.0

0.0973

62.3

98.9

12.9

123.9

16.3

158.8

4.1

188.8

25.4

228.8

J-1

King Street @ Church


Street

KS-G
King 36"
J-2

King Street @ Finn Street

King 48"

15

KS-I

0.0249

16.0

38.8

3.7

47.8

4.6

60.2

4.5

70.9

7.0

84.9

J-3

0.1223

78.3

114.3

16.6

142.9

20.9

182.9

4.2

217.3

32.4

263.0

0.1223

78.3

114.3

16.6

142.9

20.9

182.9

4.2

183.1

31.3

183.1

King 48"/54"

0.1223

78.3

112.8

16.6

141.2

20.9

181.0

4.2

183.1

31.3

183.1

KS-J

0.0258

16.5

15

89

36.7

3.5

46.0

4.4

59.0

4.1

70.2

6.8

84.9

KS-K

0.0324

20.7

15

88

44.6

4.2

56.3

5.3

72.6

4.0

86.6

8.4

105.2

KS-L

0.0425

27.2

15

85

52.7

4.9

67.9

6.4

89.2

3.7

107.7

10.2

132.2

KS-M

0.0070

4.5

15

84

8.4

0.8

10.9

1.0

14.4

3.6

17.5

1.7

21.5

0.0820

52.4

105.7

9.9

135.0

12.7

176.2

3.8

211.8

20.2

258.9

0.0820

52.4

103.8

9.9

132.6

12.7

173.0

3.8

207.8

20.2

253.8

0.2300

147.2

184.0

29.9

234.0

38.0

304.1

4.0

364.3

58.4

443.9

King 54"

0.2300

147.2

183.2

29.9

232.8

38.0

302.4

4.0

362.4

58.4

441.4

KS-Q

0.0386

24.7

63.1

6.2

76.9

7.6

95.9

4.7

112.2

11.3

133.7

J-9

0.2686

171.9

229.7

36.1

289.7

45.6

373.8

4.1

446.0

69.7

541.7

King 54"/66"

0.2686

171.9

225.1

36.1

283.8

45.6

366.1

4.1

436.8

69.7

529.8

KS-R

0.0230

14.7

39.1

3.9

47.2

4.8

58.4

4.9

67.9

7.0

80.6

J-10

0.2916

186.6

243.0

40.0

305.4

50.4

392.8

4.2

467.9

76.8

567.1

Div. at North St

J-8

King Street @ North


Street

Trumbull @ State Street

Trumbull 24"
J-7

Div. at Main St

King Street @ Trumbull


Road

King Street @ Strong Ave

15

87

15

15

92

94

96

0.2916

186.6

232.8

39.6

235.4

47.7

285.2

3.8

285.2

68.3

285.2

King 60"/66"

0.2916

186.6

218.0

39.6

229.4

47.7

282.5

3.8

285.2

68.3

285.2

KS-T

0.0164

10.5

28.4

2.9

34.1

3.5

42.0

5.0

48.8

5.1

57.8

15

97

B-6
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.3 (Contd)
King Street/Market Street/Downtown Area Watershed Drainage Analysis
Existing Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
J-12

Location
King Street @ Pleasant
Street

King Street Old Mill River


KS-U

Hampton Avenue

Old Mill River

Drainage Area
(mi2)

(ac)

0.3079

197.1

0.3079

197.1

0.0119

7.6

2-year
Tc

CN

15

95

34

78

27

75

10-year

25-year

50-year

100-year

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

221.9

42.5

234.9

51.2

289.1

3.9

292.9

73.4

296.8

221.9

42.5

234.9

51.2

289.1

3.9

292.9

73.4

296.8

19.9

2.0

24.1

2.4

30.0

4.8

35.0

3.6

41.6

19.9

2.0

24.1

2.4

30.0

4.8

35.0

3.6

41.6

47.1

6.1

64.1

8.3

88.8

3.0

110.5

14.2

139.9

45.4

6.1

61.8

8.3

85.5

3.0

106.4

14.2

134.7

18.7

2.2

26.2

3.1

37.2

2.8

47.0

5.4

60.4

53.3

8.4

72.5

11.3

100.6

3.0

125.3

19.6

158.7

0.0119

7.6

0.0707

45.2

Brook Rail Trail

0.0707

45.2

KS-B

0.0293

18.7

0.0999

63.9

Brook Woodmont Rd

0.0999

63.9

52.9

8.4

72.1

11.3

99.9

3.0

124.5

19.6

157.7

KS-D

0.0233

14.9

31

92

27.8

3.5

34.3

4.3

43.3

4.5

50.9

6.6

61.0

0.0145

9.3

15

83

16.6

1.5

21.7

2.0

29.0

3.5

35.2

3.3

43.6

0.1377

88.1

66.5

13.4

89.0

17.7

121.5

3.3

150.2

29.5

188.8

Market 48"

0.1377

88.1

66.0

13.4

88.3

17.7

120.7

3.3

149.1

29.5

187.4

KS-H

0.0097

6.2

13.8

1.3

17.3

1.6

22.2

4.1

26.4

2.6

31.9

0.1474

94.4

68.9

14.7

90.8

19.3

123.6

3.3

182.1

33.1

264.6

Market 44"/48"

0.1474

94.4

68.0

14.7

89.9

19.3

122.5

3.3

174.8

33.1

255.6

KS-O

0.0480

30.7

19

89

63.5

6.4

79.6

8.1

102.1

4.1

121.3

12.7

146.7

KS-P

0.0065

4.2

20

90

8.7

0.9

10.9

1.1

13.9

4.2

16.5

1.8

19.8

0.0357

22.8

26

82

32.1

3.7

42.3

4.8

56.8

3.4

69.5

8.0

86.4

0.0357

22.8

29.7

3.7

39.2

4.8

52.6

3.4

64.3

8.0

80.0

0.2376

152.1

137.1

26.2

193.5

36.1

263.0

4.0

371.2

64.0

543.3

Market 72"

0.2376

152.1

120.5

26.2

189.3

36.1

260.9

4.0

367.1

64.0

534.9

KS-S

0.0370

23.7

51.7

5.0

64.8

6.3

83.2

4.1

98.8

9.8

119.5

0.2746

175.8

133.3

31.1

199.2

42.4

272.2

4.0

387.0

73.8

558.2

0.2746

175.8

128.6

31.1

198.0

42.4

271.2

4.0

384.6

73.8

553.7

KS-A

J-4

Culvert @ Bikeway

Culvert @ Woodmont
Road

KS-C
J-5

J-6

KS-N

Old Market Street @


Highland Avenue

Old Market Street @


North Street

Market Street @ Walnut


Street

Market 18"/21"
J-11

J-13
Market 82"

Old Market Street @


Bridge Street

Old Market Street @


Hancock Street

15

16

89

89

B-7
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.3 (Contd)
King Street/Market Street/Downtown Area Watershed Drainage Analysis
Existing Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element

Drainage Area

Tc

CN

KS-W

0.0151

9.7

15

KS-V

0.0049

3.1

15

0.2947

J-14

Location

Old Market Street @


Holyoke Street

Market 60"
KS-X
J-15
Market Street Old Mill
River

Old Market Street @


Hockanum Road

2-year

10-year

25-year

50-year

100-year

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

(ac-ft)

(cfs)

90

22.2

2.1

27.7

2.6

35.3

4.2

41.8

4.1

50.4

96

8.4

0.8

10.1

1.0

12.5

4.9

14.5

1.5

17.2

188.6

133.6

34.1

202.7

46.0

276.6

4.0

392.7

79.4

563.1

0.2947

188.6

130.5

34.1

202.2

46.0

275.7

4.0

390.2

79.4

558.5

0.0058

3.7

7.1

0.7

9.2

0.9

12.1

3.7

14.6

1.4

17.9

0.3004

192.3

131.5

34.7

203.3

46.9

277.0

4.0

392.0

80.8

560.6

0.3004

192.3

131.5

34.7

203.3

46.9

277.0

4.0

392.0

80.8

560.6

15

85

B-8
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.4
Austin Circle/Ryan Road Area Drainage Analysis
Existing Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element

Location

RR-A1
Gregory Ln DB
Detention Basin (Inflow)
Detention Basin (Ouflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Peak Storage (acre-ft)
Top of Basin (ft)

Gregory Lane

RR-A2
Matthew Dr DB
Detention Basin (Inflow)
Detention Basin (Ouflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Peak Storage (acre-ft)
Top of Basin (ft)

Matthew Lane

Matthew Drive Route


RR-A3-1
RR Elem School
RR-B
J-1
Ryan Road Channel 1
RR-D
J-4
Ryan Road Channel 2
RR-G
J-5
Acrebrook Drive

Penscal Drive Area


Outlet at Elementary School
Btw School and Brierwood Dr.
Brierwood Drive/Austin Circle Area
Brierwood Drive Culvert
Btw Brierwood and Acrebrook Dr.
Acrebrook Drive Area
Acrebrook Drive Culvert

Drainage Area
2
(mi )
(ac)
0.0455
29.1
0.0455
29.1

0.0248
0.0703

15.9
45.0

0.0703
0.0377
0.0377
0.0100
0.1179
0.1179
0.0378
0.1557
0.1557
0.0332
0.1888
0.1888

45.0
24.1
24.1
6.4
75.4
75.4
24.2
99.6
99.6
21.2
120.9
120.9

Tc

CN

34

56

16

50

45

59

15

63

19

60

15

71

2-year
(cfs)
5.3
2.1
5.3
2.1
282.7
0.3
288.0

10-year
(cfs)
10.6
2.9
10.6
2.9
283.6
0.5
288.0

25-year
(cfs)
20.2
3.2
20.2
3.2
285.1
1.3
288.0

100-year
(cfs)
44.1
3.8
44.1
3.8
288.0
3.2
288.0

1.2
2.3
2.6
2.3
280.2
0.2
284.0

3.3
3.3
5.0
3.3
280.9
0.3
284.0

8.4
4.1
9.9
4.1
281.7
0.6
284.0

23.1
5.6
24.6
5.6
283.7
1.3
284.0

2.3
5.6
5.6
3.5
7.0
7.0
8.9
11.6
11.5
21.0
25.1
25.1

3.3
10.2
10.2
5.8
13.5
13.4
16.1
20.2
20.1
30.6
40.3
40.3

4.1
18.0
18.0
9.5
24.5
24.1
27.9
34.9
34.8
45.1
64.9
64.9

10.8
36.6
36.5
17.8
48.1
47.4
55.8
70.5
70.3
76.4
121.5
121.5

B-9
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.5
Bridge Street/Meadows Area Drainage Analysis
Future Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
2
1
Junction-A
Reach-1
3
Junction-B
Reach-2
4
Junction-C
Reach-3
FGP1
FGP7
Ppond2
SWTC2
FGP3
FGP8
Ppond4
SWCT1
FGP2
Ppond1
FGP6
SWTC3
FGP5
Ppond3
FGP4
FGP9
P-CP2
6
5

Location
Lincoln Ave.
Bridge St.

Old Ferry Rd.

Fair St.

Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Pomeroy Terrace

Drainage
Area
(acres)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


Tc(min)

CN

20
20

86
71

15

67

15

86

15
25

78
74

15
15

79
79

15

82

15

95

15

80

20
15

76
87

25
30

66
81

2-Yr
35.8
9.9
45.7
43
2.2
45
41.5
15.1
49.7
32.9
34.6
2.2
4.4
4.4
8.4
0.7
1.8
1.8
5.8
1.4
2.1
2.5
0.6
7.6
1.3
0.7
7.9
12.9
22.5

10-Yr
58.5
21.7
80.2
75.6
5.5
80.3
73.6
24.7
87.7
58
64.8
4.4
10.8
10.8
15.5
1.3
4.8
4.8
10.2
3.5
3
4.8
1.1
19.4
2.5
1.1
20.3
33.4
39.9

25-Yr
76.4
32
108.4
102.4
8.5
109.4
100.1
32.3
118.9
79
90
6.3
13.7
13.7
21.3
1.8
8.1
8.1
13.7
5.6
3.8
7.5
1.5
28.3
3.4
1.4
30.4
52.1
54.2

50-Yr
91.8
41.3
133.1
125.8
11.3
135
123.4
38.9
146.3
97.4
112.1
7.9
15.5
15.5
26.5
2.3
10.9
10.9
16.8
7.4
4.4
9.7
1.9
35.3
4.3
1.7
38.2
69.3
66.6

100-Yr
112.2
54.1
166.3
157.3
15.3
169.4
154.9
47.6
183.3
122.2
142
10.2
17.9
17.9
33.4
2.8
13.1
13.1
20.9
9.9
5.2
12.8
2.4
42.7
5.5
2.1
47
93.4
83.1

B-10
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.5 (Contd)
Bridge Street/Meadows Area Drainage Analysis
Future Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
Wetland
Reach-4
7
Junction-E
Reach-5
8
Junction-E2
9
10
Junction-F
Reach-6
11
G-Mill River
13
12
42-inch Pipe

Location

Eastern Ave.

Valley St.
William St.
Herny St.

Industrial Dr.
Marshall St.

Drainage
Area
(acres)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


Tc(min)

CN

15

83

30

70

15
15

85
75

15

70

25
30

85
83

2-Yr

10-Yr

25-Yr

50-Yr

100-Yr

10.4
10.4
12.6
13.2
10.9
8.7
19.3
15.5
7.7
38.2
37.9
1.3
39.1

41.3
40
21.6
41.7
38.5
19.3
40.8
25.8
15.4
72
71.1
3
73.6

110.2
104.5
28.9
107.7
94
28.7
98.7
33.9
21.9
104.4
104.1
4.4
104.6

174.2
165.6
35.2
170.4
147.9
37.4
155.1
41
27.7
162.8
162.6
5.8
163.3

253.2
242.1
43.6
250.3
220.1
49.4
232.3
50.3
35.7
243.1
242.6
7.6
243.7

96.9
34.6
131.5

160.4
59.5
219.6

211.7
79.5
289.7

256
96.8
350.1

314.8
119.9
430.5

5.8
1.4
112.3
115.0
36.2
4.4
114.1
119.0
7.7
7.6
113.2

10.2
3.5
112.7
115.0
68.4
10.8
115.1
119.0
19.7
19.4
113.4

13.7
5.6
113.0
115.0
95.2
13.7
116.0
119.0
28.7
28.3
113.6

16.8
7.4
113.3
115.0
118.9
15.5
119.6
119.0
35.7
35.3
113.7

20.9
9.9
113.6
115.0
150.8
17.9
119.9
119.0
43.0
42.7
113.8

Flood Storage Routing


P-Pond1 (Inflow)
P-Pond1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond2 (Inflow)
P-Pond2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond3 (Inflow)
P-Pond3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)

0.0

0.0

0.0

B-11
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.5 (Contd)
Bridge Street/Meadows Area Drainage Analysis
Future Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond4 (Inflow)
P-Pond4 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
Wetland (Inflow)
Wetland (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)

Location

Drainage
Area
(acres)

0.0

180.6

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


Tc(min)

CN

2-Yr
114.0
112.85
9.1
1.8
112.7
117.0
54.8
10.4
115.7
116.5

10-Yr
114.0
112.85
16.8
4.8
113.3
117.0
119.9
41.3
116.5
116.5

25-Yr
114.0
112.85
23.2
8.1
113.8
117.0
173.5
110.2
116.6
116.5

50-Yr
114.0
112.85
28.7
10.9
114.2
117.0
218.9
174.2
116.6
116.5

100-Yr
114.0
112.85
36.2
13.1
114.8
117.0
280.6
253.2
116.7
116.5

B-12
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.6
Elm Street Brook Area/Florence Area Drainage Analysis
Future Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
G
A
Reach-A
B
Reach-B
Junction-1
Reach-C
C
Junction-2
Reach-D
D
E
F
Junction-3
Detention Basin 1
Reach-E
Junction-4
Reach-G
H
Reach-F
I
Junction-21
Reach-Z
J
Detention Basin 2
Reach-H
K
Junction-5
Reach-I

Location

Bridge Rd.
Strawberry Hill Rd.

Straw Avenue

Drainage
Area
(acres)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


Tc

CN

15
15

73
73

15

68

15

66

15
15
25

77
75
79

15

67

15

62

15

67

15

60

2-Yr
14.4
18.8
17.8
12.2
12.0
29.5
28.1
7.1
33.9
32.6
6.2
2.3
27.0
62.1
30.9
30.2
33.6
32.7
7.4
7.1
1.5
8.6
8.2
6.3
3.5
3.5
1.5
39.1
38.7

10-Yr
30.1
39.4
36.2
29.9
30.2
66.1
61.7
18.0
76.7
72.9
11.8
4.8
49.0
128.4
52.1
52.0
65.9
64.1
17.9
17.6
4.8
22.4
20.8
15.4
6.2
6.2
5.4
89.8
88.3

25-Yr
43.8
57.1
52.2
46.6
46.6
98.7
91.6
28.5
115.3
109.7
16.5
6.9
67.1
185.6
55.8
55.7
82.4
79.3
27.9
27.3
8.0
35.2
32.7
24.0
8.0
8.0
9.2
125.3
122.8

50-Yr
56.0
73.1
66.9
62.0
61.5
128.4
119.3
38.2
150.4
143.4
20.6
8.7
83.0
237.7
59.3
59.3
101.6
96.7
37.1
36.2
11.1
47.0
43.9
31.9
9.4
9.4
13.0
159.5
155.2

100-Yr
72.7
95.0
87.0
83.3
82.2
169.3
157.6
51.8
198.9
190.0
26.2
11.3
104.8
309.7
65.6
65.6
122.5
116.2
50.0
48.6
15.5
63.6
59.4
43.0
10.9
10.9
18.5
200.3
195.3

B-13
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.6 (Contd)
Elm Street Brook Area/Florence Area Drainage Analysis
Future Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
L
Junction-6
Reach-J
M
Reach-K
O
Junction-7
Reach-L
P
Junction-8
Q
N
Junction-9
Junction-10
Reach-M
S
R
Junction-11
Reach-N
U
T
Junction-12
Reach-O
V
Junction-13
Reach-O1
W
Junction-14
Reach-P

Location

Depot Avenue

Locust St.
North Main St.

South Main St.

South Main St.

Elm St.

Hospital Rd.

Drainage
Area
(acres)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


Tc

CN

20

54

25

66

15

68

15

80

15
20

76
78

15
15

65
61

25
15

68
60

15

73

15

70

2-Yr
1.5
39.7
39.7
7.7
7.2
4.7
47.5
47.4
17.6
55.6
22.5
20.5
42.5
86.2
84.6
17.5
3.7
101.4
96.0
27.7
3.0
120.0
101.4
13.2
104.5
104.6
17.5
109.1
108.8

10-Yr
9.4
95.6
94.9
19.8
18.3
11.2
117.3
116.5
31.8
129.4
43.9
38.2
80.0
186.3
182.1
46.1
12.6
224.4
213.2
66.1
10.9
271.6
230.8
27.6
237.1
236.1
39.2
245.6
245.4

25-Yr
19.1
138.4
138.9
30.9
28.6
17.2
176.8
176.9
43.5
198.6
61.9
52.8
111.4
279.2
272.7
73.7
21.0
337.6
321.1
100.5
18.6
410.0
349.2
40.1
357.9
357.7
58.8
371.0
369.4

50-Yr
29.2
181.2
180.9
41.1
38.2
22.7
234.3
231.4
53.6
262.8
77.9
65.6
139.8
367.8
356.3
99.6
29.5
444.2
421.4
131.9
26.2
539.3
458.1
51.3
469.7
470.1
76.6
486.7
485.9

100-Yr
44.6
233.4
234.7
55.4
51.8
30.4
306.3
305.1
67.3
346.2
99.7
83.0
178.4
487.3
470.6
136.2
41.7
590.5
558.1
175.6
37.4
718.0
610.4
66.7
626.3
624.5
101.3
645.7
646.7

B-14
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.6 (Contd)
Elm Street Brook Area/Florence Area Drainage Analysis
Future Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
X
Reach-Q
Y
Junction-15
48-36-in Diversion
Reach-S
AA
Junction-16
Reach-T
EE
Junction-17
BB
Junction-18
CC
Z
DD
36-in pipe Junction
Reach-R
Junction-19
Detention Pond 3
Sink-1
Detention Basin 1 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
Detention Basin 2 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)

Location
North Elm St.

48-inch Pipe

Washington St.
Federal St.
Milton St.
Elm St.

Drainage
Area
(acres)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
689.0
113.9

14.6

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


Tc

CN

15

73

15

74

15

84

15

68

15

87

15
20
20

74
74
84

2-Yr
11.8
12.0
6.3
113.2
79.6
78.8
18.9
82.0
79.3
7.6
80.8
30.1
84.6
57.0
16.1
5.3
34.8
30.7
33.7
33.2
128.7
62.1
30.9
187.1
187.5
6.3
3.5
181.0
186.0

10-Yr
24.7
24.6
13.0
253.2
167.3
165.9
32.0
170.9
162.9
17.9
165.8
48.7
171.6
116.5
32.6
8.9
88.0
81.4
87.3
78.9
270.2
128.4
52.1
188.1
187.5
15.4
6.2
182.0
186.0

25-Yr
35.8
35.4
18.6
381.6
250.5
247.6
42.4
254.4
241.4
27.5
245.5
63.3
253.1
167.5
46.7
11.8
134.1
123.9
132.0
107.8
387.1
185.6
55.8
188.2
187.5
24
8.0
183.0
186.0

50-Yr
45.8
45.0
23.7
500.9
328.1
324.0
51.4
332.5
314.5
36.4
319.9
75.8
329.1
213.1
59.2
14.3
176.4
162.6
173.2
156.5
506.5
237.7
59.3
188.4
187.5
31.9
9.4
184.0
186.0

100-Yr
59.5
58.2
30.6
665.6
436.0
431.1
63.4
441.5
416.9
48.7
423.8
92.4
434.8
275.3
76.4
17.6
233.9
215.9
229.3
216.6
683.3
309.7
65.6
188.6
187.5
43
10.9
185.2
186.0

B-15
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.6 (Contd)
Elm Street Brook Area/Florence Area Drainage Analysis
Future Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
Detention Pond 3 (Inflow)
Detention Pond 3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)

Location

Drainage
Area
(acres)
27.5

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


Tc

CN

2-Yr
33.7
33.2
148.4
153.55

10-Yr
87.3
78.9
150.5
153.55

25-Yr
132
107.8
152.7
153.55

50-Yr
173.2
156.5
154.1
153.55

100-Yr
229.3
216.6
154.9
153.55

B-16
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.7
King Street/Market Street/Downtown Area Watershed Drainage Analysis
Future Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
KS-E
KS-F
J-1
KS-G
King 36"
J-2
King 48"
KS-I
J-3
Div. at North St
King 48"/54"
KS-J
KS-K
KS-L
KS-M
J-8
Trumbull 24"
J-7
King 54"
KS-Q
J-9
King 54"/66"
KS-R
J-10
Div. at Main St
King 60"/66"
KS-T
J-12
King Street Old Mill River
KS-U

Location

King Street @ Church Street

King Street @ Finn Street

King Street @ North Street

Trumbull @ State Street


King Street @ Trumbull Road

King Street @ Strong Ave

King Street @ Pleasant Street


Hampton Avenue

Drainage Area
2
(mi )
(ac)
0.0302
19.3
0.0278
17.8
0.0580
37.1
0.0394
25.2
0.0580
37.1
0.0973
62.3
0.0973
62.3
0.0249
16.0
0.1223
78.3
0.1223
78.3
0.1223
78.3
0.0258
16.5
0.0324
20.7
0.0425
27.2
0.0070
4.5
0.0820
52.4
0.0820
52.4
0.2300
147.2
0.2300
147.2
0.0386
24.7
0.2686
171.9
0.2686
171.9
0.0230
14.7
0.2916
186.6
0.2916
186.6
0.2916
186.6
0.0164
10.5
0.3079
197.1
0.3079
197.1
0.0119
7.6

Tc

CN

19
15

95
83

15

87

15

92

15
15
15
15

89
88
85
84

15

94

15

96

15

97

15

95

2-year
(cfs)
46.8
34.4
80.8
52.5
75.7
102.8
101.2
38.8
116.7
116.7
115.0
36.7
44.6
56.6
9.1
110.3
108.3
188.9
188.0
63.1
234.7
229.9
39.1
247.8
234.2
217.5
28.4
221.2
221.2
19.9

10-year
(cfs)
56.7
44.3
100.5
66.6
94.0
128.2
126.4
47.8
145.4
145.4
143.5
46.0
56.3
71.9
11.6
139.8
137.3
239.2
237.8
76.9
295.0
288.9
47.2
310.5
239.0
232.7
34.1
238.2
238.2
24.1

25-year
(cfs)
70.4
58.2
127.9
86.5
119.7
163.7
161.4
60.2
185.5
183.1
182.5
59.0
72.6
93.4
15.1
181.2
177.8
309.4
307.7
95.9
379.3
371.4
58.4
398.1
285.2
283.2
42.0
289.8
289.8
30.0

100-year
(cfs)
97.7
86.3
182.8
126.2
171.0
234.7
231.4
84.9
265.6
183.1
183.1
84.9
105.2
136.3
22.2
263.7
258.5
449.1
446.6
133.7
547.1
535.0
80.6
572.3
285.2
285.2
57.8
297.0
297.0
41.6

B-17
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.7 (Contd)
King Street/Market Street/Downtown Area Watershed Drainage Analysis
Future Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element
Old Mill River
KS-A
Brook Rail Trail
KS-B
J-4
Brook Woodmont Rd
KS-D
KS-C
J-5
Market 48"
KS-H
J-6
Market 44"/48"
KS-O
KS-P
KS-N
Market 18"/21"
J-11
Market 72"
KS-S
J-13
Market 82"
KS-W
KS-V
J-14
Market 60"
KS-X
J-15
Market Street Old Mill River

Location
Culvert @ Bikeway

Culvert @ Woodmont Road

Old Market Street @ Highland Avenue

Old Market Street @ North Street

Market Street @ Walnut Street


Old Market Street @ Bridge Street

Old Market Street @ Hancock Street

Old Market Street @ Holyoke Street

Old Market Street @ Hockanum Road

Drainage Area
2
(mi )
(ac)
0.0119
7.6
0.0707
45.2
0.0707
45.2
0.0293
18.7
0.0999
63.9
0.0999
63.9
0.0233
14.9
0.0145
9.3
0.1377
88.1
0.1377
88.1
0.0097
6.2
0.1474
94.4
0.1474
94.4
0.0480
30.7
0.0065
4.2
0.0357
22.8
0.0357
22.8
0.2376
152.1
0.2376
152.1
0.0370
23.7
0.2746
175.8
0.2746
175.8
0.0151
9.7
0.0049
3.1
0.2947
188.6
0.2947
188.6
0.0058
3.7
0.3004
192.3
0.3004
192.3

Tc

CN

34

78

27

75

31
15

92
83

15

89

19
20
26

89
90
82

16

89

15
15

90
96

15

85

2-year
(cfs)
19.9
51.7
49.8
19.7
58.0
57.7
27.8
18.0
71.4
70.9
15.1
72.8
72.2
69.4
8.7
32.1
29.7
144.3
135.5
56.5
149.1
144.2
24.8
8.4
149.4
145.9
8.2
147.0
147.0

10-year
(cfs)
24.1
69.1
66.6
27.3
77.8
77.3
34.3
23.2
94.4
93.7
18.6
96.1
95.3
85.4
10.9
42.3
39.2
199.2
195.8
69.6
206.1
205.0
30.2
10.1
210.3
209.7
10.3
211.0
211.0

25-year
(cfs)
30.0
94.3
90.8
38.5
106.4
105.7
43.3
30.4
127.5
126.6
23.4
129.6
128.4
107.7
13.9
56.8
52.6
269.9
267.6
87.7
281.4
279.6
37.6
12.5
287.4
286.1
13.2
287.8
287.8

100-year
(cfs)
41.6
146.0
140.5
61.9
165.0
164.0
61.0
45.1
195.3
193.8
33.0
272.0
262.8
151.8
19.8
86.4
80.0
554.9
546.3
123.6
570.1
565.5
52.5
17.2
575.3
570.4
19.0
572.6
572.6

B-18
106678-80349-03-11

Appendix B Drainage Analysis


Table B.8
Austin Circle/Ryan Road Area Drainage Analysis
Future Conditions Drainage Analysis Summary
Hydrologic Element

Location

RR-A1
Gregory Ln DB
Detention Basin (Inflow)
Detention Basin (Ouflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Peak Storage (acre-ft)
Top of Basin (ft)

Gregory Lane

RR-A2
Matthew Dr DB
Detention Basin (Inflow)
Detention Basin (Ouflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Peak Storage (acre-ft)
Top of Basin (ft)

Matthew Lane

Matthew Drive Route


RR-A3-1
RR Elem School
RR-B
J-1
Ryan Road Channel 1
RR-D
J-4
Ryan Road Channel 2
RR-G
J-5
Acrebrook Drive

Penscal Drive Area


Outlet at Elementary School
Btw School and Brierwood Dr.
Brierwood Drive/Austin Circle Area
Brierwood Drive Culvert
Btw Brierwood and Acrebrook Dr.
Acrebrook Drive Area
Acrebrook Drive Culvert

Drainage Area
2
(mi )
(ac)
0.0455
29.1
0.0455
29.1

0.0248
0.0703

15.9
45.0

0.0703
0.0377
0.0377
0.0100
0.1179
0.1179
0.0378
0.1557
0.1557
0.0332
0.1888
0.1888

45.0
24.1
24.1
6.4
75.4
75.4
24.2
99.6
99.6
21.2
120.9
120.9

Tc

CN

34

56

16

54

45

60

15

63

19

60

15

71

2-year
(cfs)
5.3
2.1
5.3
2.1
282.7
0.3
288.0

10-year
(cfs)
10.6
2.8
10.6
2.8
283.6
0.6
288.0

25-year
(cfs)
20.2
3.1
20.2
3.1
285.1
1.3
288.0

100-year
(cfs)
44.1
3.8
44.1
3.8
288.0
3.2
288.0

2.6
2.6
3.1
2.6
280.2
0.2
284.0

6.0
3.5
6.6
3.5
281.1
0.4
284.0

12.6
4.4
13.6
4.4
282.1
0.7
284.0

29.2
6.0
30.8
6.0
284.3
1.5
284.0

2.6
6.3
6.3
3.5
8.3
8.2
8.9
11.9
11.8
21.0
25.1
25.1

3.5
11.1
11.1
5.8
15.5
15.3
16.1
20.7
20.6
30.6
40.4
40.4

4.4
19.2
19.1
9.5
26.2
25.9
27.9
35.8
35.7
45.1
65.1
65.1

11.3
38.1
38.1
17.8
50.2
49.5
55.8
72.4
72.2
76.4
122.1
122.1

B-19
106678-80349-03-11

Bridge Street/Meadows Area Drainage Analysis

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
April 2011
Table 1
Existing Conditions

Hydrologic Element
2
1
Junction-A
Reach-1
FG2
FG5
E-Pond2
FG3
E-Pump
E-CP1
3
Junction-B
Reach-2
4
Junction-C
Reach-3
6
FG1
FG6
E-Pond1
FG4
E-CP2
5
Wetland
Reach-4
7
Junction-E
Reach-5
8
Junction-E2
9
10
Junction-F
Reach-6
11
G-Mill River
13
12
42-inch Pipe

Location
Lincoln Ave.
Bridge St.
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Drainage Area
(acres)
26.9
17.7
44.6

Tc
20
20

CN
84
70

20
25

80
74

Fairgrounds Site

10.9
3.4
21.5
13.5

20

73

Old Ferry Rd.

5.2

15

66

Fair St.

10.4

15

85

25
20
15

66
72
79

Pomeroy Terrace

38.7
20.7
0.7
24.8
7.5
32.3
25.0

30

80

Eastern Ave.

10.0

15

82

Valley St.

19.4

30

69

William St.
Henry St.

11.1
9.7

15
15

83
74

2.4

15

70

82.9
34.8
117.7

25
30

84
82

Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Industrial Dr.
Marshall St.

70

2-Yr
32.7
9.1
41.9
39.3
10.9
2.2
2.2
8.8
0.4
9.7
2
50.9
47
14.4
54.8
36.2
12.9
12.5
0.7
0.7
3.9
3.9
21.3
9.6
9.6
12
12.8
10.3
8
18.4
14.1
7.2
35.6
35.4
1.3
36.6
92.6
32.9
125.5

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


10-Yr
25-Yr
50-Yr
55.1
72.9
88.3
20.6
30.7
39.9
75.7
103.6
128.2
71.3
97.8
121.1
19.6
26.7
32.9
4.4
6.3
7.9
3.8
4.5
5
18.2
26.2
33.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
20.8
30
37.7
5.1
8.1
10.9
96
132.9
165.3
88.1
122
152.5
24
31.6
38.1
102.2
141.2
175.4
67.2
92.9
115.8
33.4
52.1
69.3
26.6
38.8
49.8
1.3
1.8
2.3
2.9
11
22.4
8.7
13
16.9
8.7
15.2
30.8
38.5
52.6
64.9
32.1
107.7
183.1
31.3
102.3
172.8
20.9
28.1
34.4
32.8
105.5
177.5
30.8
91.6
152.5
18.3
27.5
36.1
36.7
96.3
160
24.1
32.2
39.3
14.7
21.2
26.9
68.6
101.8
167.8
67.9
101.6
167.6
3
4.4
5.8
70.4
102.1
168.3
155.3
206.4
250.6
57.5
77.3
94.6
212.8
282.6
343.0

100-Yr
108.7
52.6
161.3
152.5
41.2
10.2
5.5
43.4
0.4
48.1
14.8
209.1
193.6
46.8
221.6
146.8
93.4
64.9
2.8
39.2
22.2
53.7
81.5
277.5
265.1
42.8
273.2
237.2
48
249.2
48.6
34.8
260.5
260.3
7.6
261.4
309.5
117.7
423.4

Flood Storage Routing


E-Pond1 (Inflow)
E-Pond1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
E-Pond2 (Inflow)
E-Pond2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
Wetland(Inflow)
Wetland(Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)

24.8

21.5

13.2
0.7
116.5
117.0
13.0
2.2
117.4
119.5
57.3
9.6
115.6
116.5

27.9
2.9
117.0
117.0
23.9
3.8
118.2
119.5
112.9
32.1
116.5
116.5

40.5
11.0
117.1
117.0
32.8
4.5
118.7
119.5
165.2
107.7
116.6
116.5

51.9
22.4
117.2
117.0
40.7
5.1
119.1
119.5
221.7
183.1
116.6
116.5

67.6
39.2
117.3
117.0
51.4
5.5
119.5
119.5
300.6
277.5
116.7
116.5

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Characteristics
March 2011
Table 2
Existing Conditions
Impervious %Imp. Weighted Tc Min) Lag Time
CN
(Min)
(acres)

Total Area

Area

Watershed

(acres)

(sq. mi.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
FG1
FG2
FG3
FG4
FG5
FG6

17.7

0.0277

2.3

13%

70

20

12

26.9

0.0420

12.4

46%

84

20

12

5.2

0.0081

0.7

14%

66

15

10.3

0.0162

5.3

51%

85

15

25.0

0.0391

9.6

38%

80

30

18

38.7

0.0605

2.7

7%

66

25

15

10.0

0.0156

4.4

45%

82

15

19.4

0.0303

3.3

17%

69

30

18

11.1

0.0174

6.3

56%

83

15

9.7

0.0151

3.4

35%

74

15

2.3

0.0037

0.1

6%

70

15

34.7

0.0543

11.7

34%

82

30

18

82.9

0.1296

45.1

54%

84

25

15

20.7

0.0324

2.9

14%

72

20

12

10.9

0.0171

3.6

33%

80

20

12

13.5

0.0211

3.2

24%

73

20

12

7.5

0.0117

1.3

17%

70

20

12

3.4

0.0053

0.6

19%

74

25

15

0.7

0.0011

0.3

48%

79

15

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Time of Concentration Calculation
April 2011
Table 3
Existing Conditions
Area 1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.005
1.3
19.2
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 4
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc4
Tc Used
Lag Time

990
0.005
1.3
12.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 7
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-2
Total Tc7
Tc Used
Lag Time

540
0.009
1.7
5.3
360
0.014
2.0
3.0
8.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 11
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

400
0.005
1.3
5.1
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc2
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 5
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.005
1.3
3.1
60
0.170
7.5
0.1
1950
0.005
1.3
25.0
28.2
30.0
0.30

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 8
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc8
Tc Used
Lag Time

1440
0.002
0.8
30.0
30.0
0.30

Area 12
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc12
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.003
0.9
30.6
30.0
0.30

Area 3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc3
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.005
1.3
6.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 6
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc6
Tc Used
Lag Time

1740
0.005
1.3
22.3
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 9
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc9
Tc Used
Lag Time

1260
0.020
2.5
8.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 10
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc10
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.005
1.3
13.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 13
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.005
1.3
21.2
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Muskingum(K) Calculation
April 2011
Table 4
Existing Conditions
tA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tA
tA

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tB
tB

600
0.004
1.2
8.3
0.14

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tC
tC

2010
0.003
0.9
39.4
0.7

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD
tD

450
0.005
1.3
5.8
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tE
tE

1290
0.008
1.5
14.3
0.24

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tF
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tF
tF

150
0.003
0.9
2.8
0.05

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
April 2011
Table 1
Future Conditions

Hydrologic Element
2
1
Junction-A
Reach-1
3
Junction-B
Reach-2
4
Junction-C
Reach-3
FGP1
FGP7
Ppond2
SWTC2
FGP3
FGP8
Ppond4
SWCT1
FGP2
Ppond1
FGP6
SWTC3
FGP5
Ppond3
FGP4
FGP9
P-CP2
6
5
Wetland
Reach-4
7
Junction-E
Reach-5
8
Junction-E2
9
10
Junction-F
Reach-6
11
G-Mill River
13
12
42-inch Pipe

Location
Lincoln Ave.
Bridge St.
Old Ferry Rd.
Fair St.
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Pomeroy Terrace
Eastern Ave.
Valley St.
William St.
Herny St.

Industrial Dr.
Marshall St.

Drainage Area
(acres)
26.9
17.7
44.6
44.6
5.2
49.8
49.8
10.4
60.1
60.1
35.9
3.4
39.3
39.3
8.3
0.7
9.0
9.0
4.9
4.9
1.0
5.9
0.6
54.7
1.6
0.4
56.7
38.7
25.0
180.6
180.6
10.0
190.6
190.6
19.4
210.0
11.1
9.7
230.8
230.8
2.4
233.1
82.9
34.7
117.7

Tc(min)
20
20

CN
86
71

15

67

15

86

15
25

78
74

15
15

79
79

15

82

15

95

15

80

20
15

76
87

25
30

66
81

15

83

30

70

15
15

85
75

15

70

25
30

85
83

2-Yr
35.8
9.9
45.7
43
2.2
45
41.5
15.1
49.7
32.9
34.6
2.2
4.4
4.4
8.4
0.7
1.8
1.8
5.8
1.4
2.1
2.5
0.6
7.6
1.3
0.7
7.9
12.9
22.5
10.4
10.4
12.6
13.2
10.9
8.7
19.3
15.5
7.7
38.2
37.9
1.3
39.1
96.9
34.6
131.5

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


10-Yr
25-Yr
50-Yr
58.5
76.4
91.8
21.7
32
41.3
80.2
108.4
133.1
75.6
102.4
125.8
5.5
8.5
11.3
80.3
109.4
135
73.6
100.1
123.4
24.7
32.3
38.9
87.7
118.9
146.3
58
79
97.4
64.8
90
112.1
4.4
6.3
7.9
10.8
13.7
15.5
10.8
13.7
15.5
15.5
21.3
26.5
1.3
1.8
2.3
4.8
8.1
10.9
4.8
8.1
10.9
10.2
13.7
16.8
3.5
5.6
7.4
3
3.8
4.4
4.8
7.5
9.7
1.1
1.5
1.9
19.4
28.3
35.3
2.5
3.4
4.3
1.1
1.4
1.7
20.3
30.4
38.2
33.4
52.1
69.3
39.9
54.2
66.6
41.3
110.2
174.2
40
104.5
165.6
21.6
28.9
35.2
41.7
107.7
170.4
38.5
94
147.9
19.3
28.7
37.4
40.8
98.7
155.1
25.8
33.9
41
15.4
21.9
27.7
72
104.4
162.8
71.1
104.1
162.6
3
4.4
5.8
73.6
104.6
163.3
160.4
211.7
256
59.5
79.5
96.8
219.6
289.7
350.1

100-Yr
112.2
54.1
166.3
157.3
15.3
169.4
154.9
47.6
183.3
122.2
142
10.2
17.9
17.9
33.4
2.8
13.1
13.1
20.9
9.9
5.2
12.8
2.4
42.7
5.5
2.1
47
93.4
83.1
253.2
242.1
43.6
250.3
220.1
49.4
232.3
50.3
35.7
243.1
242.6
7.6
243.7
314.8
119.9
430.5

Flood Storage Routing


P-Pond1 (Inflow)
P-Pond1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond2 (Inflow)
P-Pond2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond3 (Inflow)
P-Pond3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond4 (Inflow)
P-Pond4 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
Wetland (Inflow)
Wetland (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)

4.9

39.3

54.7

9.0

180.6

5.8
1.4
112.3
115.0
36.2
4.4
114.1
119.0
7.7
7.6
113.2
114.0
112.85
9.1
1.8
112.7
117.0
54.8
10.4
115.7
116.5

10.2
3.5
112.7
115.0
68.4
10.8
115.1
119.0
19.7
19.4
113.4
114.0
112.85
16.8
4.8
113.3
117.0
119.9
41.3
116.5
116.5

13.7
5.6
113.0
115.0
95.2
13.7
116.0
119.0
28.7
28.3
113.6
114.0
112.85
23.2
8.1
113.8
117.0
173.5
110.2
116.6
116.5

16.8
7.4
113.3
115.0
118.9
15.5
119.6
119.0
35.7
35.3
113.7
114.0
112.85
28.7
10.9
114.2
117.0
218.9
174.2
116.6
116.5

20.9
9.9
113.6
115.0
150.8
17.9
119.9
119.0
43.0
42.7
113.8
114.0
112.85
36.2
13.1
114.8
117.0
280.6
253.2
116.7
116.5

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Characteristics
March 2011
Table 2
Future Conditions
Weighted
CN

Tc Min)

Lag Time
(Min)

13%

71

20

12

12.4

46%

86

20

12

0.7

14%

67

15

0.0162

5.3

51%

86

15

25.0

0.0391

9.6

38%

81

30

18

38.7

0.0605

2.7

7%

66

25

15

10.0

0.0156

4.4

45%

83

15

19.4

0.0303

3.3

17%

70

30

18

11.1

0.0174

6.3

56%

85

15

9.7

0.0151

3.4

35%

75

15

2.3

0.0037

0.1

6%

70

15

34.7

0.0543

11.7

34%

83

30

18

82.9

0.1296

30.7

37%

85

25

15

35.9

0.0561

12.2

34%

78

15

4.9

0.0076

2.7

55%

82

15

8.3

0.0129

2.0

24%

79

15

1.6

0.0025

0.2

15%

76

20

12

0.6

0.0009

0.3

52%

80

15

1.0

0.0016

0.9

92%

95

15

3.4

0.0053

0.6

19%

74

25

15

0.7

0.0011

0.3

49%

79

15

0.5

0.0007

0.3

63%

87

15

Total Area

Area

Impervious %Imp.
(acres)

Watershed

(acres)

(sq. mi.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
FGP1
FGP2
FGP3
FGP4
FGP5
FGP6
FGP7
FGP8
FGP9

17.7

0.0277

2.3

26.9

0.0420

5.2

0.0081

10.3

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Time of Concentration Calculation
April 2011
Table 3
Future Conditions
Area 1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.005
1.3
19.2
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 4
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc4
Tc Used
Lag Time

990
0.005
1.3
12.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 7
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-2
Total Tc7
Tc Used
Lag Time

540
0.009
1.7
5.3
360
0.014
2.0
3.0
8.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 11
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

400
0.005
1.3
5.1
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc2
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 5
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.005
1.3
3.1
60
0.170
7.5
0.1
1950
0.005
1.3
25.0
28.2
30.0
0.30

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 8
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc8
Tc Used
Lag Time

1440
0.002
0.8
30.0
30.0
0.30

Area 12
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc12
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.003
0.9
30.6
30.0
0.30

Area 3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc3
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.005
1.3
6.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 6
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc6
Tc Used
Lag Time

1740
0.005
1.3
22.3
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 9
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc9
Tc Used
Lag Time

1260
0.020
2.5
8.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 10
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc10
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.005
1.3
13.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 13
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.005
1.3
21.2
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Muskingum(K) Calculation
April 2011
Table 4
Future Conditions
tA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tA
tA

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tB
tB

600
0.004
1.2
8.3
0.14

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tC
tC

2010
0.003
0.9
39.4
0.7

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD
tD

450
0.005
1.3
5.8
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tE
tE

1290
0.008
1.5
14.3
0.24

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tF
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tF
tF

150
0.003
0.9
2.8
0.05

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
April 2011
Table 1
Future Conditions (Alternative 1)

Hydrologic Element
FGP1
FGP7
Ppond2
SWTC2
FGP3
FGP8
Ppond4
SWCT1
FGP2
Ppond1
FGP6
SWTC3
FGP5
Ppond3
FGP4
FGP9
P-CP2
6
FS-1
5
1
Junction-A
Reach-1
3
Junction-B
Reach-2
Junction-C
Reach-3
Wetland
Reach-4
7
Junction-E
Reach-5
8
9
10
Junction-F
Reach-6
11
G-Mill River
13
2
4
Reach-7
Junction-G
Reach-8
12
42-inch Pipe

Location
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Pomeroy Terrace
Bridge St.

Old Ferry Rd.

Eastern Ave.

Valley St.
William St.
Herny St.

Industrial Dr.
Lincoln Ave.
Fair St.

Marshall St.

Drainage Area
(acres)
35.9
3.4
39.3
39.3
8.3
0.7
9.0
9.0
4.9
4.9
1.0
5.9
0.6
54.7
1.6
0.4
56.7
38.7
95.5
25.0
17.7
17.7
17.7
5.2
22.9
22.9
22.9
22.9
143.4
143.4
10.0
153.4
153.4
19.4
11.1
9.7
193.5
193.5
2.4
195.9
82.9
26.9
10.4
10.4
37.2
37.2
34.7
154.9

Tc(min)
15
25

CN
78
74

15
15

79
79

15

82

15

95

15

80

20
15

76
87

25

66

30
20

81
71

15

67

15

83

30
15
15

70
85
75

15

70

25
20
15

85
86
86

30

83

2-Yr
34.6
2.2
4.4
4.4
8.4
0.7
1.8
1.8
5.8
1.4
2.1
2.5
0.6
7.6
1.3
0.7
7.9
12.9
7.8
22.5
9.9
9.9
9.3
2.2
11.2
10.5
10.5
6.5
4.9
4.9
12.6
12.9
10.2
8.7
15.5
7.7
38
37.6
1.3
38.8
96.9
35.8
15.1
14.5
50.3
30.7
34.6
152.3

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


10-Yr
25-Yr
50-Yr
64.8
90
112.1
4.4
6.3
7.9
10.8
13.7
15.5
10.8
13.7
15.5
15.5
21.3
26.5
1.3
1.8
2.3
4.8
8.1
10.9
4.8
8.1
10.9
10.2
13.7
16.8
3.5
5.6
7.4
3
3.8
4.4
4.8
7.5
9.7
1.1
1.5
1.9
19.4
28.3
35.3
2.5
3.4
4.3
1.1
1.4
1.7
20.3
30.4
38.2
33.4
52.1
69.3
17.9
24.6
30.6
39.9
54.2
66.6
21.7
32
41.3
21.7
32
41.3
20.3
30
38.8
5.5
8.5
11.3
25
37
48
23.1
34.1
44.1
23.1
34.1
44.1
14.5
21.7
28.3
12.4
23.6
39.8
12.4
23.3
39.2
21.6
28.9
35.2
22.3
30
41.1
17.7
23.8
39.4
19.3
28.7
37.4
25.8
33.9
41
15.4
21.9
27.7
71.2
99.1
123.9
70.3
97.7
122
3
4.4
5.8
72.8
101.3
126.6
160.4
211.7
256
58.5
76.4
91.8
24.7
32.3
38.9
23.7
31
37.2
82.2
107.4
129
50.5
66.3
79.9
59.5
79.5
96.8
255.3
337.3
408.1

100-Yr
142
10.2
17.9
17.9
33.4
2.8
13.1
13.1
20.9
9.9
5.2
12.8
2.4
42.7
5.5
2.1
47
93.4
47.5
83.1
54.1
54.1
50.9
15.3
63.1
58.2
58.2
37.4
72.7
70.7
43.6
74.2
68.9
49.4
50.3
35.7
157.5
154.9
7.6
160.9
314.8
112.2
47.6
45.5
157.7
98
119.9
502.2

Flood Storage Routing


FS-1 (Inflow)
FS-1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond1 (Inflow)
P-Pond1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond2 (Inflow)
P-Pond2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond3 (Inflow)
P-Pond3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond4 (Inflow)
P-Pond4 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
Wetland (Inflow)
Wetland (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)

95.1

4.9

39.3

54.7

9.0

14.6
7.8
114.1
117.0
116.0
5.8
1.4
112.3
115.0
36.2
4.4
114.1
119.0
7.7
7.6
113.2
114.0
112.85
9.1
1.8
112.7
117.0
23.7
4.9
115.1
116.5

44.7
17.9
114.8
117.0
116.0
10.2
3.5
112.7
115.0
68.4
10.8
115.1
119.0
19.7
19.4
113.4
114.0
112.85
16.8
4.8
113.3
117.0
43.8
12.4
115.9
116.5

76.6
24.6
115.5
117.0
116.0
13.7
5.6
113.0
115.0
95.2
13.7
116.0
119.0
28.7
28.3
113.6
114.0
112.85
23.2
8.1
113.8
117.0
71.7
23.6
116.5
116.5

103.9
30.6
116.1
117.0
116.0
16.8
7.4
113.3
115.0
118.9
15.5
116.8
119.0
35.7
35.3
113.7
114.0
112.85
28.7
10.9
114.2
117.0
93.2
39.8
116.5
116.5

138.5
47.5
116.7
117.0
116.0
20.9
9.9
113.6
115.0
150.8
17.9
117.8
119.0
43.0
42.7
113.8
114.0
112.85
36.2
13.1
114.8
117.0
119.6
72.7
116.5
116.5

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Characteristics
April 2011
Table 2
Future Conditions (Alternative 1)
Weighted
CN

Tc Min)

Lag Time
(Min)

13%

71

20

12

12.4

46%

86

20

12

0.7

14%

67

15

0.0162

5.3

51%

86

15

25.0

0.0391

9.6

38%

81

30

18

38.7

0.0605

2.7

7%

66

25

15

10.0

0.0156

4.4

45%

83

15

19.4

0.0303

3.3

17%

70

30

18

11.1

0.0174

6.3

56%

85

15

9.7

0.0151

3.4

35%

75

15

2.3

0.0037

0.1

6%

70

15

34.7

0.0543

11.7

34%

83

30

18

82.9

0.1296

45.1

54%

85

25

15

35.9

0.0561

12.2

34%

78

15

4.9

0.0076

2.7

55%

82

15

8.3

0.0129

2.0

24%

79

15

1.6

0.0025

0.2

15%

76

20

12

0.6

0.0009

0.3

52%

80

15

1.0

0.0016

0.9

92%

95

15

3.4

0.0053

0.6

19%

74

25

15

0.7

0.0011

0.3

49%

79

15

0.5

0.0007

0.3

63%

87

15

Total Area

Area

Impervious %Imp.
(acres)

Watershed

(acres)

(sq. mi.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
FGP1
FGP2
FGP3
FGP4
FGP5
FGP6
FGP7
FGP8
FGP9

17.7

0.0277

2.3

26.9

0.0420

5.2

0.0081

10.3

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Time of Concentration Calculation
April 2011
Table 3
Future Conditions (Alternative 1)
Area 1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.005
1.3
19.2
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 4
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc4
Tc Used
Lag Time

990
0.005
1.3
12.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 7
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-2
Total Tc7
Tc Used
Lag Time

540
0.009
1.7
5.3
360
0.014
2.0
3.0
8.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 11
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

400
0.005
1.3
5.1
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc2
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 5
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.005
1.3
3.1
60
0.170
7.5
0.1
1950
0.005
1.3
25.0
28.2
30.0
0.30

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 8
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc8
Tc Used
Lag Time

1440
0.002
0.8
30.0
30.0
0.30

Area 12
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc12
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.003
0.9
30.6
30.0
0.30

Area 3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc3
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.005
1.3
6.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 6
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc6
Tc Used
Lag Time

1740
0.005
1.3
22.3
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 9
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc9
Tc Used
Lag Time

1260
0.020
2.5
8.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 10
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc10
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.005
1.3
13.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 13
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.005
1.3
21.2
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Muskingum(K) Calculation
April 2011
Table 4
Future Conditions (Alternative 1)
tA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tA
tA

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tB
tB

600
0.004
1.2
8.3
0.14

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tC
tC

2010
0.003
0.9
39.4
0.7

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD
tD

450
0.005
1.3
5.8
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tE
tE

1290
0.008
1.5
14.3
0.24

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tF
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tF
tF

150
0.003
0.9
2.8
0.05

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
April 2011
Table 1
Future Conditions (Alternative 2)

Hydrologic Element
FGP1
FGP7
Ppond2
SWTC2
FGP3
FGP8
Ppond4
SWCT1
FGP2
Ppond1
FGP6
SWTC3
FGP5
Ppond3
FGP4
FGP9
P-CP2
6
5
1
Junction-A
Reach-1
3
Junction-B
Reach-2
Junction-C
Reach-3
Wetland
Reach-4
7
Junction-E
Reach-5
8
9
10
Junction-F
Reach-6
11
G-Mill River
13
2
4
Reach-7
Junction-G
Reach-8
12
42-inch Pipe

Drainage Area
(acres)
35.9
3.4
39.3
39.3
Fairgrounds Site
8.3
Fairgrounds Site
0.7
9.0
9.0
Fairgrounds Site
4.9
4.9
Fairgrounds Site
1.0
5.9
Fairgrounds Site
0.6
54.7
Fairgrounds Site
1.6
Fairgrounds Site
0.4
56.7
38.7
Pomeroy Terrace
25.0
Bridge St.
17.7
17.7
17.7
Old Ferry Rd.
5.2
22.9
22.9
22.9
22.9
143.4
143.4
Eastern Ave.
10.0
153.4
153.4
Valley St.
19.4
William St.
11.1
Henry St.
9.7
193.5
193.5
2.4
195.9
Industrial Dr.
82.9
Lincoln Ave.
26.9
Fair St.
10.4
10.4
37.2
37.2
Marshall St.
34.7
154.9
Location
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Tc(min)
15
25

CN
78
74

15
15

79
79

15

82

15

95

15

80

20
15

76
87

25
30
20

66
81
71

15

67

15

83

30
15
15

70
85
75

15

70

25
20
15

85
86
86

30

83

2-Yr
9.9
9.9
9.3
2.2
11.2
10.5
10.5
6.5
34.6
2.2
4.4
4.4
8.4
0.7
1.8
1.8
5.8
1.4
2.1
2.5
0.6
7.6
1.3
0.7
7.9
12.9
22.5
38.1
37
12.6
44
39.4
8.7
15.5
7.7
56.2
56
1.3
56.6
96.9
35.8
15.1
14.5
50.3
30.7
34.6
152.3

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


10-Yr
25-Yr
50-Yr
64.8
90
112.1
4.4
6.3
7.9
10.8
13.7
15.5
10.8
13.7
15.5
15.5
21.3
26.5
1.3
1.8
2.3
4.8
8.1
10.9
4.8
8.1
10.9
10.2
13.7
16.8
3.5
5.6
7.4
3
3.8
4.4
4.8
7.5
9.7
1.1
1.5
1.9
19.4
28.3
35.3
2.5
3.4
4.3
1.1
1.4
1.7
20.3
30.4
38.2
33.4
52.1
69.3
39.9
54.2
66.6
21.7
32
41.3
21.7
32
41.3
20.3
30
38.8
5.5
8.5
11.3
25
37
48
23.1
34.1
44.1
23.1
34.1
44.1
14.5
21.7
28.3
13.6
35.6
70.3
13.6
34.9
67.2
21.6
28.9
35.2
22.6
36.8
70.8
18.1
34.9
64
19.3
28.7
37.4
25.8
33.9
41
15.4
21.9
27.7
71.4
99.5
124.6
70.5
98.1
122.7
3
4.4
5.8
73
101.7
127.3
160.4
211.7
256
58.5
76.4
91.8
24.7
32.3
38.9
23.7
31
37.2
82.2
107.4
129
50.5
66.3
79.9
59.5
79.5
96.8
255.3
337.3
408.1

100-Yr
142
10.2
17.9
17.9
33.4
2.8
13.1
13.1
20.9
9.9
5.2
12.8
2.4
42.7
5.5
2.1
47
93.4
83.1
54.1
54.1
50.9
15.3
63.1
58.2
58.2
37.4
139.9
130.2
43.6
136
117.9
49.4
50.3
35.7
158.9
156.5
7.6
162.4
314.8
112.2
47.6
45.5
157.7
98
119.9
502.2

Flood Storage Routing


P-Pond1 (Inflow)
P-Pond1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond2 (Inflow)
P-Pond2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond3 (Inflow)
P-Pond3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond4 (Inflow)
P-Pond4 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
Wetland (Inflow)
Wetland (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)

4.9

39.3

54.7

9.0

5.8
1.4
112.3
115.0
36.2
4.4
114.1
119.0
7.7
7.6
113.2
114.0
112.85
9.1
1.8
112.7
117.0
38.1
6.3
115.2
116.5

10.2
3.5
112.7
115.0
68.4
10.8
115.1
119.0
19.7
19.4
113.4
114.0
112.85
16.8
4.8
113.3
117.0
88.2
13.6
116.1
116.5

13.7
5.6
113.0
115.0
95.2
13.7
116.0
119.0
28.7
28.3
113.6
114.0
112.85
23.2
8.1
113.8
117.0
137.3
35.6
116.5
116.5

16.8
7.4
113.3
115.0
118.9
15.5
119.6
119.0
35.7
35.3
113.7
114.0
112.85
28.7
10.9
114.2
117.0
177.9
70.3
116.5
116.5

20.9
9.9
113.6
115.0
150.8
17.9
119.9
119.0
43.0
42.7
113.8
114.0
112.85
36.2
13.1
114.8
117.0
232.3
139.9
116.6
116.5

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Characteristics
March 2011
Table 2
Future Conditions (Alternative 2)
Weighted
CN

Tc Min)

Lag Time
(Min)

13%

71

20

12

12.4

46%

86

20

12

0.7

14%

67

15

0.0162

5.3

51%

86

15

25.0

0.0391

9.6

38%

81

30

18

38.7

0.0605

2.7

7%

66

25

15

10.0

0.0156

4.4

45%

83

15

19.4

0.0303

3.3

17%

70

30

18

11.1

0.0174

6.3

56%

85

15

9.7

0.0151

3.4

35%

75

15

2.3

0.0037

0.1

6%

70

15

34.7

0.0543

11.7

34%

83

30

18

82.9

0.1296

45.1

54%

85

25

15

35.9

0.0561

12.2

34%

78

15

4.9

0.0076

2.7

55%

82

15

8.3

0.0129

2.0

24%

79

15

1.6

0.0025

0.2

15%

76

20

12

0.6

0.0009

0.3

52%

80

15

1.0

0.0016

0.9

92%

95

15

3.4

0.0053

0.6

19%

74

25

15

0.7

0.0011

0.3

49%

79

15

0.5

0.0007

0.3

63%

87

15

Total Area

Area

Impervious %Imp.
(acres)

Watershed

(acres)

(sq. mi.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
FGP1
FGP2
FGP3
FGP4
FGP5
FGP6
FGP7
FGP8
FGP9

17.7

0.0277

2.3

26.9

0.0420

5.2

0.0081

10.3

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Time of Concentration Calculation
April 2011
Table 3
Future Conditions (Alternative 2)
Area 1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.005
1.3
19.2
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 4
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc4
Tc Used
Lag Time

990
0.005
1.3
12.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 7
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-2
Total Tc7
Tc Used
Lag Time

540
0.009
1.7
5.3
360
0.014
2.0
3.0
8.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 11
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

400
0.005
1.3
5.1
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc2
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 5
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.005
1.3
3.1
60
0.170
7.5
0.1
1950
0.005
1.3
25.0
28.2
30.0
0.30

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 8
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc8
Tc Used
Lag Time

1440
0.002
0.8
30.0
30.0
0.30

Area 12
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc12
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.003
0.9
30.6
30.0
0.30

Area 3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc3
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.005
1.3
6.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 6
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc6
Tc Used
Lag Time

1740
0.005
1.3
22.3
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 9
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc9
Tc Used
Lag Time

1260
0.020
2.5
8.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 10
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc10
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.005
1.3
13.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 13
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.005
1.3
21.2
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Muskingum(K) Calculation
April 2011
Table 4
Future Conditions (Alternative 2)
tA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tA
tA

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tB
tB

600
0.004
1.2
8.3
0.14

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tC
tC

2010
0.003
0.9
39.4
0.7

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD
tD

450
0.005
1.3
5.8
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tE
tE

1290
0.008
1.5
14.3
0.24

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tF
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tF
tF

150
0.003
0.9
2.8
0.05

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tG
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD
tD

330
0.005
1.3
4.2
0.07

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tH
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD
tD

2820
0.005
1.3
36.2
0.60

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
April 2011
Table 1
Future Conditions (Alternative 3)

Hydrologic Element
2
1
Junction-A
Reach-1
3
Junction-B
Reach-2
4
Junction-C
Reach-3
6
5
Wetland
Reach-4
7
Junction-E
Reach-5
8
9
10
Junction-F
Reach-6
11
G-Mill River
13
12
42-inch Pipe
FGP1
FGP7
Ppond2
SWTC2
FGP3
FGP8
Ppond4
SWCT1
FGP2
Ppond1
FGP6
SWTC3
FGP5
Ppond3
FGP4
FGP9
P-CP2
Sink-1
Flood Storage Routing
P-Pond1 (Inflow)
P-Pond1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond2 (Inflow)
P-Pond2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond3 (Inflow)
P-Pond3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond4 (Inflow)
P-Pond4 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)

Location
Lincoln Ave.
Bridge St.
Old Ferry Rd.
Fair St.

Pomeroy Terrace
Eastern Ave.
Valley St.
William St.
Herny St.

Industrial Dr.
Marshall St.
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Drainage Area
(acres)
26.9
17.7
44.6
44.6
5.2
49.8
49.8
10.4
60.1
60.1
38.7
25.0
123.9
123.9
10.0
133.8
133.8
19.4
11.1
9.7
174.0
174.0
2.4
176.4
82.9
34.7
117.7
35.9
3.4
39.3
39.3
8.3
0.7
9.0
9.0
4.9
4.9
1.0
5.9
0.6
54.7
1.6
0.4
56.7
56.7

4.9

39.3

54.7

9.0

Tc(min)
20
20

CN
86
71

15

67

15

86

25
30

66
81

15

83

30
15
15

70
85
75

15

70

25
30

85
83

15
25

78
74

15
15

79
79

15

82

15

95

15

80

20
15

76
87

2-Yr
35.8
9.9
45.7
43
2.2
45
41.5
15.1
49.7
32.9
12.9
22.5
7.8
7.8
12.6
13.2
10.6
8.7
15.5
7.7
38.2
37.9
1.3
39.1
96.9
34.6
131.5
34.6
2.2
4.4
4.4
8.4
0.7
1.8
1.8
5.8
1.4
2.1
2.5
0.6
7.6
1.3
0.7
7.9
7.9

5.8
1.4
112.3
115.0
36.2
4.4
114.1
119.0
7.7
7.6
113.2
114.0
112.85
9.1
1.8
112.7
117.0

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


10-Yr
25-Yr
50-Yr
58.5
76.4
91.8
21.7
32
41.3
80.2
108.4
133.1
75.6
102.4
125.8
5.5
8.5
11.3
80.3
109.4
135
73.6
100.1
123.4
24.7
32.3
38.9
87.7
118.9
146.3
58
79
97.4
33.4
52.1
69.3
39.9
54.2
66.6
14.6
61.5
120.4
14.6
58.3
114.3
21.6
28.9
35.2
23.2
61.1
118.4
18.7
54.1
101.8
19.3
28.7
37.4
25.8
33.9
41
15.4
21.9
27.7
72
100.4
125.7
71.1
99
123.9
3
4.4
5.8
73.6
102.6
128.5
160.4
211.7
256
59.5
79.5
96.8
219.6
289.7
350.1
64.8
90
112.1
4.4
6.3
7.9
10.8
13.7
15.5
10.8
13.7
15.5
15.5
21.3
26.5
1.3
1.8
2.3
4.8
8.1
10.9
4.8
8.1
10.9
10.2
13.7
16.8
3.5
5.6
7.4
3
3.8
4.4
4.8
7.5
9.7
1.1
1.5
1.9
19.4
28.3
35.3
2.5
3.4
4.3
1.1
1.4
1.7
20.3
30.4
38.2
20.3
30.4
38.2

10.2
3.5
112.7
115.0
68.4
10.8
115.1
119.0
19.7
19.4
113.4
114.0
112.85
16.8
4.8
113.3
117.0

13.7
5.6
113.0
115.0
95.2
13.7
116.0
119.0
28.7
28.3
113.6
114.0
112.85
23.2
8.1
113.8
117.0

16.8
7.4
113.3
115.0
118.9
15.5
119.6
119.0
35.7
35.3
113.7
114.0
112.85
28.7
10.9
114.2
117.0

100-Yr
112.2
54.1
166.3
157.3
15.3
169.4
154.9
47.6
183.3
122.2
93.4
83.1
195.0
183.9
43.6
190.3
166.4
49.4
50.3
35.7
187.5
186.6
7.6
187.6
314.8
119.9
430.5
142.0
10.2
17.9
17.9
33.4
2.8
13.1
13.1
20.9
9.9
5.2
12.8
2.4
42.7
5.5
2.1
47.0
47.0

20.9
9.9
113.6
115.0
150.8
17.9
119.9
119.0
43.0
42.7
113.8
114.0
112.85
36.2
13.1
114.8
117.0

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Characteristics
April 2011
Table 2
Future Conditions (Alternative 3)
Weighted
CN

Tc Min)

Lag Time
(Min)

13%

71

20

12

12.4

46%

86

20

12

0.7

14%

67

15

0.0162

5.3

51%

86

15

25.0

0.0391

9.6

38%

81

30

18

38.7

0.0605

2.7

7%

66

25

15

10.0

0.0156

4.4

45%

83

15

19.4

0.0303

3.3

17%

70

30

18

11.1

0.0174

6.3

56%

85

15

9.7

0.0151

3.4

35%

75

15

2.3

0.0037

0.1

6%

70

15

34.7

0.0543

11.7

34%

83

30

18

82.9

0.1296

45.1

54%

85

25

15

35.9

0.0561

12.2

34%

78

15

4.9

0.0076

2.7

55%

82

15

8.3

0.0129

2.0

24%

79

15

1.6

0.0025

0.2

15%

76

20

12

0.6

0.0009

0.3

52%

80

15

1.0

0.0016

0.9

92%

95

15

3.4

0.0053

0.6

19%

74

25

15

0.7

0.0011

0.3

49%

79

15

0.5

0.0007

0.3

63%

87

15

Total Area

Area

Impervious %Imp.
(acres)

Watershed

(acres)

(sq. mi.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
FGP1
FGP2
FGP3
FGP4
FGP5
FGP6
FGP7
FGP8
FGP9

17.7

0.0277

2.3

26.9

0.0420

5.2

0.0081

10.3

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Time of Concentration Calculation
April 2011
Table 3
Future Conditions (Alternative 3)
Area 1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.005
1.3
19.2
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 4
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc4
Tc Used
Lag Time

990
0.005
1.3
12.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 7
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-2
Total Tc7
Tc Used
Lag Time

540
0.009
1.7
5.3
360
0.014
2.0
3.0
8.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 11
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

400
0.005
1.3
5.1
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc2
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 5
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.005
1.3
3.1
60
0.170
7.5
0.1
1950
0.005
1.3
25.0
28.2
30.0
0.30

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 8
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc8
Tc Used
Lag Time

1440
0.002
0.8
30.0
30.0
0.30

Area 12
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc12
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.003
0.9
30.6
30.0
0.30

Area 3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc3
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.005
1.3
6.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 6
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc6
Tc Used
Lag Time

1740
0.005
1.3
22.3
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 9
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc9
Tc Used
Lag Time

1260
0.020
2.5
8.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 10
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc10
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.005
1.3
13.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 13
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.005
1.3
21.2
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Muskingum(K) Calculation
April 2011
Table 4
Future Conditions (Alternative 3)
tA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tA
tA

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tB
tB

600
0.004
1.2
8.3
0.14

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tC
tC

2010
0.003
0.9
39.4
0.7

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD
tD

450
0.005
1.3
5.8
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tE
tE

1290
0.008
1.5
14.3
0.24

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tF
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tF
tF

150
0.003
0.9
2.8
0.05

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
April 2011
Table 1
Future Conditions (Recommended Plan)

Hydrologic Element
6
5
4
Junction-A
Reach-1
Junction-B
Reach-2
Junction-C
Reach-3
Wetland
Reach-4
7
Junction-E
Reach-5
8
Junction-E2
9
10
Junction-F
Reach-6
11
G-Mill River
13
12
42-inch Pipe
FGP1
FGP7
Ppond2
SWTC2
FGP3
FGP8
Ppond4
SWCT1
FGP2
Ppond1
FGP6
SWTC3
FGP5
Ppond3
FGP4
FGP9
P-CP2
2
1
3
Sink-1

Location
Pomeroy Terrace
Fair St.

Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Industrial Dr.
Marshall St.
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site

Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Fairgrounds Site
Lincoln Ave.
Bridge St.
Old Ferry Rd.

Drainage Area
(acres)
38.7
25.0
10.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.4
10.4
74.1
74.1
10.0
84.1
84.1
19.4
103.5
11.1
9.7
124.2
124.2
2.4
126.6
82.9
34.7
117.7
35.9
3.4
39.3
39.3
8.3
0.7
9.0
9.0
4.9
4.9
1.0
5.9
0.6
54.7
1.6
0.4
56.7
26.9
17.7
5.2
106.5

Tc(min)
25
30
15

CN
66
81
86

15

83

30

70

15
15

85
75

15

70

25
30

82
83

20
20
15

86
71
67

2-Yr
12.9
22.5
15.1
0
0
0
0
15.1
8.2
3.7
3.7
12.6
13
10.4
8.7
19.1
15.5
7.7
38.1
37.7
1.3
38.9
96.9
34.6
131.5
34.6
2.2
4.4
4.4
8.4
0.7
1.8
1.8
5.8
1.4
2.1
2.5
0.6
7.6
1.3
0.7
7.9
35.8
9.9
2.2
49.9

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


10-Yr
25-Yr
50-Yr
33.4
52.1
69.3
39.9
54.2
66.6
24.7
32.3
38.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24.7
32.3
38.9
13.6
17.8
21.4
8
12
14.5
8
12
14.5
21.6
28.9
35.2
22.7
30.8
37.8
18.2
24.7
30.4
19.3
28.7
37.4
37.5
53.2
67.5
25.8
33.9
41
15.4
21.9
27.7
71.5
99.7
124.7
70.6
98.3
122.8
3
4.4
5.8
73.1
101.9
127.4
160.4
211.7
256
59.5
79.5
96.8
219.6
289.7
350.1
64.8
90
112.1
4.4
6.3
7.9
10.8
13.7
15.5
10.8
13.7
15.5
15.5
21.3
26.5
1.3
1.8
2.3
4.8
8.1
10.9
4.8
8.1
10.9
10.2
13.7
16.8
3.5
5.6
7.4
3
3.8
4.4
4.8
7.5
9.7
1.1
1.5
1.9
19.4
28.3
35.3
2.5
3.4
4.3
1.1
1.4
1.7
20.3
30.4
38.2
58.5
76.4
91.8
21.7
32
41.3
5.5
8.5
11.3
89.1
135.4
173.9

100-Yr
93.4
83.1
47.6
0
0
0
0
47.6
26.3
44.7
42.3
43.6
47.4
41.9
49.4
87.4
50.3
35.7
158.7
156.3
7.6
162.2
314.8
119.9
430.5
142
10.2
17.9
17.9
33.4
2.8
13.1
13.1
20.9
9.9
5.2
12.8
2.4
42.7
5.5
2.1
47
112.2
54.1
15.3
221.7

Flood Storage Routing


P-Pond1 (Inflow)
P-Pond1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond2 (Inflow)
P-Pond2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond3 (Inflow)
P-Pond3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Pond Surface Elevation (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)
P-Pond4 (Inflow)
P-Pond4 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft.)
Spillway Elevation (ft.)

4.9

39.3

54.7

9.0

5.8
1.4
112.3
115.0
36.2
4.4
114.1
119.0
7.7
7.6
113.2
114.0
112.85
9.1
1.8
112.7
117.0

10.2
3.5
112.7
115.0
68.4
10.8
115.1
119.0
19.7
19.4
113.4
114.0
112.85
16.8
4.8
113.3
117.0

13.7
5.6
113.0
115.0
95.2
13.7
116.0
119.0
28.7
28.3
113.6
114.0
112.85
23.2
8.1
113.8
117.0

16.8
7.4
113.3
115.0
118.9
15.5
119.6
119.0
35.7
35.3
113.7
114.0
112.85
28.7
10.9
114.2
117.0

20.9
9.9
113.6
115.0
150.8
17.9
119.9
119.0
43.0
42.7
113.8
114.0
112.85
36.2
13.1
114.8
117.0

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Characteristics
March 2011
Table 2
Future Conditions (Recommended Plan)
Weighted
CN

Tc Min)

Lag Time
(Min)

13%

71

20

12

12.4

46%

86

20

12

0.7

14%

67

15

0.0162

5.3

51%

86

15

25.0

0.0391

9.6

38%

81

30

18

38.7

0.0605

2.7

7%

66

25

15

10.0

0.0156

4.4

45%

83

15

19.4

0.0303

3.3

17%

70

30

18

11.1

0.0174

6.3

56%

85

15

9.7

0.0151

3.4

35%

75

15

2.3

0.0037

0.1

6%

70

15

34.7

0.0543

11.7

34%

83

30

18

82.9

0.1296

21.0

25%

82

25

15

35.9

0.0561

12.2

34%

78

15

4.9

0.0076

2.7

55%

82

15

8.3

0.0129

2.0

24%

79

15

1.6

0.0025

0.2

15%

76

20

12

0.6

0.0009

0.3

52%

80

15

1.0

0.0016

0.9

92%

95

15

3.4

0.0053

0.6

19%

74

25

15

0.7

0.0011

0.3

49%

79

15

0.5

0.0007

0.3

63%

87

15

Total Area

Area

Impervious %Imp.
(acres)

Watershed

(acres)

(sq. mi.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
FGP1
FGP2
FGP3
FGP4
FGP5
FGP6
FGP7
FGP8
FGP9

17.7

0.0277

2.3

26.9

0.0420

5.2

0.0081

10.3

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Time of Concentration Calculation
April 2011
Table 3
Future Conditions (Recommended Plan)
Area 1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.005
1.3
19.2
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 4
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc4
Tc Used
Lag Time

990
0.005
1.3
12.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 7
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc7-2
Total Tc7
Tc Used
Lag Time

540
0.009
1.7
5.3
360
0.014
2.0
3.0
8.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 11
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

400
0.005
1.3
5.1
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc2
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 5
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc5-3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.005
1.3
3.1
60
0.170
7.5
0.1
1950
0.005
1.3
25.0
28.2
30.0
0.30

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area 8
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc8
Tc Used
Lag Time

1440
0.002
0.8
30.0
30.0
0.30

Area 12
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc12
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.003
0.9
30.6
30.0
0.30

Area 3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc3
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.005
1.3
6.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 6
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc6
Tc Used
Lag Time

1740
0.005
1.3
22.3
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 9
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc9
Tc Used
Lag Time

1260
0.020
2.5
8.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 10
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc10
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.005
1.3
13.5
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area 13
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
Tc11
Tc Used
Lag Time

1650
0.005
1.3
21.2
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Williams Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Muskingum(K) Calculation
April 2011
Table 4
Future Conditions (Recommended Plan)
tA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tA
tA

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tB
tB

600
0.004
1.2
8.3
0.14

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tC
tC

2010
0.003
0.9
39.4
0.7

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD
tD

450
0.005
1.3
5.8
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tE
tE

1290
0.008
1.5
14.3
0.24

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tF
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tF
tF

150
0.003
0.9
2.8
0.05

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

Elm Street Brook/Florence Area Drainage Analysis

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
April 2011
Table 1
Existing Conditions
Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)
Hydrologic Element
A
Junction-1
B
Junction-2
C
Junction-3
D
E
F
Detention Basin 1 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
Junction-4
G
H
I
Junction-5
J
Detention Basin 2 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
K
Junction-6
L
Junction-7
M
O
Junction-8
P
Junction-9
Junction-10
Q
N
Junction-11
S
R
Junction-12
Junction-13
Junction-14
Junction-15
X
Y
W
V
U
T
48-36-in Diversion
36-in pipe Junction
CC
Z
DD
Junction-16
AA
Junction-17
EE
Junction-18
BB
Junction-19
Detention Pond 3 (Inflow)
Detention Pond 3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
Sink-1

Location
Bridge Rd.
Strawberry Hill Rd.

Straw Avenue

Drainage
Area (acres)
27.1
54.8
27.7
73.0
18.2
113.9
6.8
3.1
31.0

Tc
15

CN
72

15

67

15

66

15
15
25

77
74
78

15
15
15

72
62
61

15

66

15

60

20

54

25
15

64
68

15

73

15
20

76
74

15
15

65
61

15
15
15
15
25
15

73
74
70
73
67
60

15
20
20

73
74
82

15

84

15

68

15

86

113.9

157.8
20.7
17.0
6.3
180.5
14.6
14.6

Depot Avenue

Locust St.
North Main St.
South Main St.

North Elm St.


Hospital Rd.
Elm St.
South Main St.

Federal St.
Milton St.
Elm St.
48-inch Pipe

Washington St.

8.1
208.6
28.1
241.6
23.0
10.0
257.9
16.3
49.3
307.3
26.4
23.0
374.3
49.4
17.6
459.1
478.1
509.5
535.0
17.0
8.5
31.4
19.0
68.4
16.4
535.0
4.4
76.5
23.2
4.4
549.2
14.3
565.2
16.0
585.1
19.8
27.5
27.5

689.1

2-Yr
17.5
27.9
11.8
32.4
7.1
59.3
6.2
2.3
25.5
59.3
27
186.9
187.5
29.4
13.4
4.1
1.3
33.8
5.7
5.7
3.3
180.9
186
1.5
34.6
1.5
42.0
6.2
4.7
47.2
11.3
38
74.7
22.5
16
89.3
17.5
3.7
106.9
93.2
97.6
101.7
11.8
6.3
17.5
13.2
25.1
3
73.8
29.0
53.0
16.1
4.8
76.7
18.9
76.6
7.6
80.3
28.8
27.2
27.2
26.9
148.2
153.55
123.6

10-Yr
37.5
63.4
29
74.2
18
124.5
11.8
4.8
47.2
124.5
51.8
188.1
187.5
65.2
28.7
13
4.5
83
14.5
14.5
6
181.9
186
5.4
89
9.4
108.7
17.5
11.2
118.0
23.7
74.1
171.5
43.9
32.3
209.3
46.1
12.6
254.2
221.7
230.2
237.8
24.7
13
39.2
27.6
62.5
10.9
157.4
82.5
111.2
32.6
8.4
161.1
32
156.7
17.9
162.4
47.3
82.2
82.2
75.7
150.3
153.55
261

25-Yr
55
95.5
45.3
112.2
28.5
181
16.5
6.9
65.1
181
55.4
188.2
187.5
80.5
42.1
21.5
7.5
115.2
22.9
22.9
7.8
182.9
186
9.2
128.9
19.1
165
28.1
17.2
183.7
34.4
104.8
262.7
61.9
46.3
320.8
73.7
21
390.6
340
353.3
364.1
35.8
18.6
58.8
40.1
96.2
18.6
239.2
127.9
161.4
46.7
11.2
243.2
42.4
235
27.5
242.7
61.9
126.3
126.3
104.3
152.4
153.55
376.8

50-Yr
70.8
124.7
60.3
146.9
38.2
232.6
20.6
8.7
80.9
232.6
59
188.4
187.5
98.7
54.2
29.9
10.5
149.6
30.7
30.7
9.2
183.8
186
13
171.6
29.2
222.3
37.9
22.7
247.7
44.1
132.8
349.6
77.9
58.7
425.7
99.6
29.5
518.1
450.5
467.3
481.8
45.8
23.7
76.6
51.3
127.2
26.2
315.7
169.6
206.6
59.2
13.7
320.3
51.4
308.5
36.4
317.6
74.4
167
167
150.2
154.0
153.55
485.6

100-Yr
92.5
165.1
81.4
195
51.8
304.1
26.2
11.3
102.5
304.1
64.9
188.5
187.5
120.4
70.8
41.9
14.9
192.8
41.6
41.6
10.8
185.1
186
18.5
229.3
44.6
295.5
51.9
30.4
333.3
57.3
170.9
471.6
99.7
75.7
573.1
136.2
41.7
697.6
607.2
626.8
646.4
59.5
30.6
101.3
66.7
170.3
37.4
423.7
227
268.3
76.4
17
429.2
63.4
412.1
48.7
423.1
91.1
223
223
210
154.8
153.55
664.3

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Characteristics
March 2011
Table 2

Existing Conditions
Total Area
Watershed (acres)
A
27.0

B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
BB
CC
DD
EE

Area
(sq. mi.)

Impervious %Imp. Weighted


CN
(acres)

Tc

Lag Time
(Min)

0.0423

6.6

0.24

72

15

27.7

0.0433

3.7

0.13

67

15

18.1

0.0284

1.8

0.10

66

15

6.8

0.0106

1.1

0.16

77

15

3.1

0.0049

1.1

0.35

74

15

30.9

0.0484

8.6

0.28

78

25

15

20.7

0.0324

6.3

0.30

72

15

17.0

0.0265

2.0

0.12

62

15

6.3

0.0098

0.6

0.09

61

15

14.6

0.0228

3.6

0.25

66

15

8.1

0.0127

0.4

0.05

60

15

28.1

0.0439

4.9

0.17

54

20

12

23.0

0.0359

9.0

0.39

64

25

15

23.0

0.0359

13.6

0.59

74

20

12

10.0

0.0156

2.2

0.22

68

15

16.3

0.0255

8.3

0.51

73

15

26.4

0.0412

15.7

0.59

76

15

17.6

0.0275

0.5

0.03

61

15

49.4

0.0772

2.9

0.06

65

15

16.4

0.0257

2.5

0.15

60

15

68.4

0.1069

14.5

0.21

67

25

15

19.0

0.0297

5.1

0.27

73

15

31.4

0.0490

14.8

0.47

70

15

17.0

0.0265

5.4

0.32

73

15

8.5

0.0133

1.4

0.16

74

15

23.2

0.0362

7.4

0.32

74

20

12

14.3

0.0223

7.8

0.54

84

15

19.8

0.0310

10.0

0.51

86

15

76.5

0.1195

19.1

0.25

73

15

4.4

0.0068

2.2

0.51

82

20

12

16.0

0.0250

1.0

0.06

68

15.00

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Time of Concentration Calculation
March 2011

Existing Conditions
Area A
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA3
Total TcA
Tc Used
Lag Time

840
0.027
2.7
5.2
450
0.044
3.7
2.0
780
0.013
2.0
6.5
13.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area B
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcB1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcB2
Total TcB
Tc Used
Lag Time

840
0.040
3.5
4.0
390
0.026
2.8
2.3
6.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area D
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcD1
Tc Used
Lag Time

660
0.091
5.3
2.1
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area E
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcD1
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.8
1.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area H
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcH1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcH2
Total TcH
Tc Used
Lag Time

360
0.028
2.9
2.1
420
0.024
2.7
2.6
4.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area J
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ4
Total TcJ
Tc Used
Lag Time

210
0.143
5.8
0.6
570
0.018
2.4
4.0
60
0.330
9.0
0.1
300
0.005
1.1
4.5
9.2
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area M
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcM1
Tc Used
Lag Time

2250
0.009
1.7
22.1
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area P
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcP1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.038
3.5
5.0
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area R
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcR1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcR2
Total TcR
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.2
2.0
450
0.022
2.2
3.4
5.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area U
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcU1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcU2
Total TcU
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
1380
0.073
4.2
5.5
22.1
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area X
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcX1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1740
0.014
2.1
13.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area C
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcC1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcC2
Total TcC
Tc Used
Lag Time

300
0.033
3.1
1.6
810
0.031
2.6
5.2
6.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area F
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.6
1.8
2400
0.017
2.2
18.2
150
0.200
7.0
0.4
20.4
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area K
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI2
Total TcI
Tc Used
Lag Time

200
0.167
7.5
0.4
510
0.029
0.9
10.0
10.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area N
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcN1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcN2
Total TcN
Tc Used
Lag Time

1380
0.015
2.1
11.0
1200
0.049
3.7
5.4
16.4
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Q
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcQ1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcQ2
Total TcQ
Tc Used
Lag Time

1110
0.018
2.4
7.7
720
0.028
3.0
4.0
11.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area S
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

420
0.007
1.5
4.7
210
0.238
2.4
1.5
960
0.031
2.6
6.2
12.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area V
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcV1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcV2
Total TcV
Tc Used
Lag Time

450
0.089
1.5
5.0
600
0.050
3.4
2.9
7.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area G
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcG1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcG2
Total TcG
Tc Used
Lag Time

300
0.067
4.5
1.1
870
0.023
2.5
5.8
6.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area I
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI2
Total TcI
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.4
1.9
300
0.033
3.3
1.5
3.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area L
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL4
Total TcL
Tc Used
Lag Time

450
0.044
1.2
6.3
360
0.028
0.9
7.1
420
0.048
1.3
5.4
90
0.440
3.5
0.4
19.1
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area O
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcO1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcO2
Total TcO
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.125
6.0
0.7
810
0.012
1.7
7.9
8.6
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area T
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcT1
Tc Used
Lag Time

750
0.067
1.2
10.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area W
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcW1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcW2
Total TcW
Tc Used
Lag Time

360
0.056
4.5
1.3
1110
0.049
3.4
5.4
6.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Y
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcY1
Tc Used
Lag Time

150
0.133
1.6
1.6
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area Z
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcZ1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area AA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcAA1
Tc Used
Lag Time

570
0.088
5.0
1.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area BB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcBB1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcBB2
Total TcBB
Tc Used
Lag Time

900
0.005
1.3
11.5
750
0.067
4.5
2.8
14.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area CC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcCC1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcCC2
Total TcCC
Tc Used
Lag Time

900
0.005
1.3
11.5
750
0.067
4.5
2.8
14.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area DD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD2
Total TcDD
Tc Used
Lag Time

630
0.032
3.1
3.4
1200
0.005
1.5
13.3
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area EE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD2
Total TcDD
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.250
2.5
1.6
960
0.010
1.5
10.7
12.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Muskingum(K) Calculation
March 2011

Existing Conditions
tA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tA
tA

540
0.005
1.5
6.0
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tB
tB

240
0.005
1.5
2.7
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tC
tC

810
0.025
2.7
5.0
0.1

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD2
Total tD
tD

300
0.025
2.7
1.9
280
0.005
1.2
3.9
5.7
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hour

tE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tE
tE

450
0.011
1.6
4.7
0.08

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tF
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tF
tF

900
0.067
4.5
3.3
0.06

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

450
0.033
3.2
2.3
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tI
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tI2
Total tD
tD

420
0.012
1.5
4.7
90
0.600
12.0
0.1
4.8
0.08

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hour

tG
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tG
tG

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tH
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tH
tH

tJ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tJ
tJ

300
0.100
5.0
1.0
0.02

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tK
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tK
tK

1200
0.033
2.6
7.7
0.13

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tL
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tL
tL

360
0.028
2.5
2.4
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tM
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tM
tM

720
0.014
1.8
6.7
0.11

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tN
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tN
tN

900
0.011
1.6
9.4
0.16

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tO
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tO
tO

1500
0.007
1.2
20.8
0.35

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tO1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tO1
tO1

150
0.005
1.1
2.3
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tP
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tP
tP

300
0.017
2.0
2.5
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tQ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tQ
tQ

450
0.060
3.7
2.0
0.03

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tR
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tR
tR

1650
0.006
1.3
21.2
0.35

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tS
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tS
tS

900
0.011
2.2
6.8
0.11

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tT
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tT
tT

1200
0.005
1.1
18.2
0.30

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tZ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tG
tG

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
April 2011
Table 1
Future Conditions
Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)
Hydrologic Element
G
A
Reach-A
B
Reach-B
Junction-1
Reach-C
C
Junction-2
Reach-D
D
E
F
Junction-3
Detention Basin 1
Reach-E
Junction-4
Reach-G
H
Reach-F
I
Junction-21
Reach-Z
J
Detention Basin 2
Reach-H
K
Junction-5
Reach-I
L
Junction-6
Reach-J
M
Reach-K
O
Junction-7
Reach-L
P
Junction-8
Q
N
Junction-9
Junction-10
Reach-M
S
R
Junction-11
Reach-N
U
T
Junction-12
Reach-O
V
Junction-13
Reach-O1
W
Junction-14
Reach-P
X
Reach-Q
Y
Junction-15
48-36-in Diversion
Reach-S
AA
Junction-16
Reach-T
EE
Junction-17
BB
Junction-18
CC
Z
DD
36-in pipe Junction
Reach-R
Junction-19
Detention Pond 3
Sink-1
Detention Basin 1 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
Detention Basin 2 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
Detention Pond 3 (Inflow)
Detention Pond 3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)

Location
Bridge Rd.
Strawberry Hill Rd.

Straw Avenue

Depot Avenue

Locust St.
North Main St.

South Main St.

South Main St.

Elm St.
Hospital Rd.
North Elm St.

48-inch Pipe

Washington St.
Federal St.
Milton St.
Elm St.

Drainage
Area (acres)
20.7
27.1
27.1
27.7
27.7
54.8
54.8
18.2
73.0
73.0
6.8
3.1
31.0
113.9
113.9
113.9
134.6
134.6
17.0
17.0
6.3
23.2
23.2
14.6
14.6
14.6
8.1
180.5
180.5
28.1
208.6
208.6
23.0
23.0
10.0
241.6
241.6
16.3
257.9
26.4
23.0
49.3
307.3
307.3
49.4
17.6
374.3
374.3
68.4
16.4
459.1
459.1
19.0
478.1
478.1
31.4
509.5
509.5
17.0
17.0
8.5
535.0
535.0
535.0
14.3
549.2
549.2
16.0
565.2
19.8
585.1
76.5
23.2
4.4
4.4
4.4
27.5
27.5
689.0
113.9

14.6

27.5

Tc
15
15

CN
73
73

15

68

15

66

15
15
25

77
75
79

15

67

15

62

15

67

15

60

20

54

25

66

15

68

15

80

15
20

76
78

15
15

65
61

25
15

68
60

15

73

15

70

15

73

15

74

15

84

15

68

15

87

15
20
20

74
74
84

2-Yr
14.4
18.8
17.8
12.2
12.0
29.5
28.1
7.1
33.9
32.6
6.2
2.3
27.0
62.1
30.9
30.2
33.6
32.7
7.4
7.1
1.5
8.6
8.2
6.3
3.5
3.5
1.5
39.1
38.7
1.5
39.7
39.7
7.7
7.2
4.7
47.5
47.4
17.6
55.6
22.5
20.5
42.5
86.2
84.6
17.5
3.7
101.4
96.0
27.7
3.0
120.0
101.4
13.2
104.5
104.6
17.5
109.1
108.8
11.8
12.0
6.3
113.2
79.6
78.8
18.9
82.0
79.3
7.6
80.8
30.1
84.6
57.0
16.1
5.3
34.8
30.7
33.7
33.2
128.7
62.1
30.9
187.1
187.5
6.3
3.5
181.0
186.0
33.7
33.2
148.4
153.55

10-Yr
30.1
39.4
36.2
29.9
30.2
66.1
61.7
18.0
76.7
72.9
11.8
4.8
49.0
128.4
52.1
52.0
65.9
64.1
17.9
17.6
4.8
22.4
20.8
15.4
6.2
6.2
5.4
89.8
88.3
9.4
95.6
94.9
19.8
18.3
11.2
117.3
116.5
31.8
129.4
43.9
38.2
80.0
186.3
182.1
46.1
12.6
224.4
213.2
66.1
10.9
271.6
230.8
27.6
237.1
236.1
39.2
245.6
245.4
24.7
24.6
13.0
253.2
167.3
165.9
32.0
170.9
162.9
17.9
165.8
48.7
171.6
116.5
32.6
8.9
88.0
81.4
87.3
78.9
270.2
128.4
52.1
188.1
187.5
15.4
6.2
182.0
186.0
87.3
78.9
150.5
153.55

25-Yr
43.8
57.1
52.2
46.6
46.6
98.7
91.6
28.5
115.3
109.7
16.5
6.9
67.1
185.6
55.8
55.7
82.4
79.3
27.9
27.3
8.0
35.2
32.7
24.0
8.0
8.0
9.2
125.3
122.8
19.1
138.4
138.9
30.9
28.6
17.2
176.8
176.9
43.5
198.6
61.9
52.8
111.4
279.2
272.7
73.7
21.0
337.6
321.1
100.5
18.6
410.0
349.2
40.1
357.9
357.7
58.8
371.0
369.4
35.8
35.4
18.6
381.6
250.5
247.6
42.4
254.4
241.4
27.5
245.5
63.3
253.1
167.5
46.7
11.8
134.1
123.9
132.0
107.8
387.1
185.6
55.8
188.2
187.5
24
8.0
183.0
186.0
132
107.8
152.7
153.55

50-Yr
56.0
73.1
66.9
62.0
61.5
128.4
119.3
38.2
150.4
143.4
20.6
8.7
83.0
237.7
59.3
59.3
101.6
96.7
37.1
36.2
11.1
47.0
43.9
31.9
9.4
9.4
13.0
159.5
155.2
29.2
181.2
180.9
41.1
38.2
22.7
234.3
231.4
53.6
262.8
77.9
65.6
139.8
367.8
356.3
99.6
29.5
444.2
421.4
131.9
26.2
539.3
458.1
51.3
469.7
470.1
76.6
486.7
485.9
45.8
45.0
23.7
500.9
328.1
324.0
51.4
332.5
314.5
36.4
319.9
75.8
329.1
213.1
59.2
14.3
176.4
162.6
173.2
156.5
506.5
237.7
59.3
188.4
187.5
31.9
9.4
184.0
186.0
173.2
156.5
154.1
153.55

100-Yr
72.7
95.0
87.0
83.3
82.2
169.3
157.6
51.8
198.9
190.0
26.2
11.3
104.8
309.7
65.6
65.6
122.5
116.2
50.0
48.6
15.5
63.6
59.4
43.0
10.9
10.9
18.5
200.3
195.3
44.6
233.4
234.7
55.4
51.8
30.4
306.3
305.1
67.3
346.2
99.7
83.0
178.4
487.3
470.6
136.2
41.7
590.5
558.1
175.6
37.4
718.0
610.4
66.7
626.3
624.5
101.3
645.7
646.7
59.5
58.2
30.6
665.6
436.0
431.1
63.4
441.5
416.9
48.7
423.8
92.4
434.8
275.3
76.4
17.6
233.9
215.9
229.3
216.6
683.3
309.7
65.6
188.6
187.5
43
10.9
185.2
186.0
229.3
216.6
154.9
153.55

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Characteristics
March 2011
Table 2

Future Conditions
Total Area
Watershed (acres)
A
27.0

B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
BB
CC
DD
EE

Area
(sq. mi.)

Impervious %Imp. Weighted


CN
(acres)

Tc

Lag Time
(Min)

0.0423

6.6

0.24

73

15

27.7

0.0433

3.7

0.13

68

15

18.1

0.0284

1.8

0.10

66

15

6.8

0.0106

1.1

0.16

77

15

3.1

0.0049

1.1

0.35

75

15

30.9

0.0484

8.6

0.28

79

25

15

20.7

0.0324

6.3

0.30

73

15

17.0

0.0265

2.0

0.12

67

15

6.3

0.0098

0.6

0.09

62

15

14.6

0.0228

3.6

0.25

67

15

8.1

0.0127

0.4

0.05

60

15

28.1

0.0439

4.9

0.17

54

20

12

23.0

0.0359

9.0

0.39

66

25

15

23.0

0.0359

13.6

0.59

78

20

12

10.0

0.0156

2.2

0.22

68

15

16.3

0.0255

8.3

0.51

80

15

26.4

0.0412

15.7

0.59

76

15

17.6

0.0275

0.5

0.03

61

15

49.4

0.0772

2.9

0.06

65

15

16.4

0.0257

2.5

0.15

60

15

68.4

0.1069

14.5

0.21

68

25

15

19.0

0.0297

5.1

0.27

73

15

31.4

0.0490

14.8

0.47

70

15

17.0

0.0265

5.4

0.32

73

15

8.5

0.0133

1.4

0.16

74

15

23.2

0.0362

7.4

0.32

74

20

12

14.3

0.0223

7.8

0.54

84

15

19.8

0.0310

10.0

0.51

87

15

76.5

0.1195

19.1

0.25

74

15

4.4

0.0068

2.2

0.51

84

20

12

16.0

0.0250

1.0

0.06

68

15.00

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Time of Concentration Calculation
March 2011

Future Conditions
Area A
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA3
Total TcA
Tc Used
Lag Time

840
0.027
2.7
5.2
450
0.044
3.7
2.0
780
0.013
2.0
6.5
13.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area B
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcB1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcB2
Total TcB
Tc Used
Lag Time

840
0.040
3.5
4.0
390
0.026
2.8
2.3
6.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area D
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcD1
Tc Used
Lag Time

660
0.091
5.3
2.1
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area E
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcD1
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.8
1.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area H
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcH1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcH2
Total TcH
Tc Used
Lag Time

360
0.028
2.9
2.1
420
0.024
2.7
2.6
4.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area J
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ4
Total TcJ
Tc Used
Lag Time

210
0.143
5.8
0.6
570
0.018
2.4
4.0
60
0.330
9.0
0.1
300
0.005
1.1
4.5
9.2
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area M
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcM1
Tc Used
Lag Time

2250
0.009
1.7
22.1
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area P
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcP1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.038
3.5
5.0
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area R
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcR1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcR2
Total TcR
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.2
2.0
450
0.022
2.2
3.4
5.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area U
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcU1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcU2
Total TcU
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
1380
0.073
4.2
5.5
22.1
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area X
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcX1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1740
0.014
2.1
13.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area C
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcC1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcC2
Total TcC
Tc Used
Lag Time

300
0.033
3.1
1.6
810
0.031
2.6
5.2
6.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area F
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.6
1.8
2400
0.017
2.2
18.2
150
0.200
7.0
0.4
20.4
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area K
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI2
Total TcI
Tc Used
Lag Time

200
0.167
7.5
0.4
510
0.029
0.9
10.0
10.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area N
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcN1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcN2
Total TcN
Tc Used
Lag Time

1380
0.015
2.1
11.0
1200
0.049
3.7
5.4
16.4
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Q
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcQ1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcQ2
Total TcQ
Tc Used
Lag Time

1110
0.018
2.4
7.7
720
0.028
3.0
4.0
11.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area S
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

420
0.007
1.5
4.7
210
0.238
2.4
1.5
960
0.031
2.6
6.2
12.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area V
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcV1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcV2
Total TcV
Tc Used
Lag Time

450
0.089
1.5
5.0
600
0.050
3.4
2.9
7.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area G
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcG1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcG2
Total TcG
Tc Used
Lag Time

300
0.067
4.5
1.1
870
0.023
2.5
5.8
6.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area I
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI2
Total TcI
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.4
1.9
300
0.033
3.3
1.5
3.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area L
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL4
Total TcL
Tc Used
Lag Time

450
0.044
1.2
6.3
360
0.028
0.9
7.1
420
0.048
1.3
5.4
90
0.440
3.5
0.4
19.1
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area O
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcO1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcO2
Total TcO
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.125
6.0
0.7
810
0.012
1.7
7.9
8.6
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area T
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcT1
Tc Used
Lag Time

750
0.067
1.2
10.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area W
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcW1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcW2
Total TcW
Tc Used
Lag Time

360
0.056
4.5
1.3
1110
0.049
3.4
5.4
6.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Y
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcY1
Tc Used
Lag Time

150
0.133
1.6
1.6
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area Z
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcZ1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area AA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcAA1
Tc Used
Lag Time

570
0.088
5.0
1.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area BB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcBB1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcBB2
Total TcBB
Tc Used
Lag Time

900
0.005
1.3
11.5
750
0.067
4.5
2.8
14.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area CC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcCC1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcCC2
Total TcCC
Tc Used
Lag Time

900
0.005
1.3
11.5
750
0.067
4.5
2.8
14.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area DD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD2
Total TcDD
Tc Used
Lag Time

630
0.032
3.1
3.4
1200
0.005
1.5
13.3
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area EE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD2
Total TcDD
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.250
2.5
1.6
960
0.010
1.5
10.7
12.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Muskingum(K) Calculation
March 2011

Future Conditions
tA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tA
tA

540
0.005
1.5
6.0
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tB
tB

240
0.005
1.5
2.7
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tC
tC

810
0.025
2.7
5.0
0.1

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD2
Total tD
tD

300
0.025
2.7
1.9
280
0.005
1.2
3.9
5.7
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hour

tE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tE
tE

450
0.011
1.6
4.7
0.08

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tF
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tF
tF

900
0.067
4.5
3.3
0.06

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

450
0.033
3.2
2.3
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tI
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tI2
Total tD
tD

420
0.012
1.5
4.7
90
0.600
12.0
0.1
4.8
0.08

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hour

tG
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tG
tG

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tH
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tH
tH

tJ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tJ
tJ

300
0.100
5.0
1.0
0.02

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tK
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tK
tK

1200
0.033
2.6
7.7
0.13

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tL
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tL
tL

360
0.028
2.5
2.4
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tM
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tM
tM

720
0.014
1.8
6.7
0.11

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tN
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tN
tN

900
0.011
1.6
9.4
0.16

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tO
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tO
tO

1500
0.007
1.2
20.8
0.35

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tO1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tO1
tO1

150
0.005
1.1
2.3
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tP
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tP
tP

300
0.017
2.0
2.5
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tQ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tQ
tQ

450
0.060
3.7
2.0
0.03

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tR
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tR
tR

1650
0.006
1.3
21.2
0.35

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tS
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tS
tS

900
0.011
2.2
6.8
0.11

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tT
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tT
tT

1200
0.005
1.1
18.2
0.30

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tZ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tG
tG

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Alternative 1 Divert Flow to Federal Street
Drainage Analysis Summary
April 2011
Table 1

Future Conditions (Alternative 1)


Hydrologic Element
G
A
Reach-A
B
Reach-B
Junction-1
Reach-C
C
Junction-2
Reach-D
D
E
F
Junction-3
Detention Basin 1
Reach-E
Junction-4
Reach-G
H
Reach-F
I
Junction-21
Reach-Z
J
Detention Basin 2
Reach-H
K
Junction-5
Reach-I
L
Junction-6
Reach-J
M
Reach-K
O
Junction-7
Reach-L
P
Junction-8
Q
N
Junction-9
Junction-10
Reach-M
S
R
Junction-11
Reach-N
T
Junction-12
Reach-O
V
Junction-13
Reach-O1
W
Junction-14
Reach-P
X
Reach-Q
Y
Junction-15
48-36-in Diversion
Reach-S
AA
Junction-16
Reach-T
EE
Junction-17
BB
Junction-18
U+CC
Z
DD
36-in pipe Junction
Reach-R
Junction-19
Detention Pond 3
Sink-1
Detention Basin 1 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
Detention Basin 2 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
Detention Pond 3 (Inflow)
Detention Pond 3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)

Location
Bridge Rd.
Strawberry Hill Rd.

Straw Avenue

Depot Avenue

Locust St.
North Main St.

South Main St.

Elm St.
Hospital Rd.
North Elm St.

48-Inch Pipe

Washington St.
Federal St.
Milton St.
Elm St.

Drainage
Area (acres)
20.7
27.1
27.1
27.7
27.7
54.8
54.8
18.2
73.0
73.0
6.8
3.1
31.0
113.9
113.9
113.9
134.6
134.6
17.0
17.0
6.3
23.2
23.2
14.6
14.6
14.6
8.1
180.5
180.5
28.1
208.6
208.6
23.0
23.0
10.0
241.6
241.6
16.3
257.9
26.4
23.0
49.3
307.3
307.3
49.4
17.6
374.3
374.3
16.4
390.7
390.7
19.0
409.7
409.7
31.4
441.1
441.1
17.0
17.0
8.5
466.6
466.6
466.6
14.3
480.8
480.8
16.0
496.8
19.8
516.7
144.8
23.2
4.4
4.4
4.4
27.5
27.5
689.0
113.9

14.6

27.5

Tc(min)
15
15

CN
73
73

15

68

15

66

15
15
25

77
75
79

15

67

15

62

15

67

15

60

20

54

25

66

15

68

15

80

15
20

76
78

15
15

65
61

15

60

15

73

15

70

15

73

15

74

15

84

15

68

15

87

40
20
20

73
74
84

2-Yr
14.4
18.8
17.8
12.2
12.0
29.5
28.1
7.1
33.9
32.6
6.2
2.3
27.0
62.1
30.9
30.2
33.6
32.7
7.4
7.1
1.5
8.6
8.2
6.3
3.5
3.5
1.5
39.1
38.7
1.5
39.7
39.7
7.7
7.2
4.7
47.5
47.4
17.6
55.6
22.5
20.5
42.5
86.2
84.6
17.5
3.7
101.4
96.0
3.0
98.1
83.3
13.2
86.4
86.3
17.5
90.3
90.4
11.8
12.0
6.3
94.3
72.2
72.0
18.9
74.9
73.6
7.6
75.1
30.1
78.7
72.0
16.1
5.3
23.2
19.2
22.2
22.0
160.1
62.1
30.9
187.1
187.5
6.3
3.5
181.0
186.0
22.2
22.0
148.2
153.55

Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)


10-Yr
25-Yr
50-Yr
30.1
43.8
56.0
39.4
57.1
73.1
36.2
52.2
66.9
29.9
46.6
62.0
30.2
46.6
61.5
66.1
98.7
128.4
61.7
91.6
119.3
18.0
28.5
38.2
76.7
115.3
150.4
72.9
109.7
143.4
11.8
16.5
20.6
4.8
6.9
8.7
49.0
67.1
83.0
128.4
185.6
237.7
52.1
55.8
59.3
52.0
55.7
59.3
65.9
82.4
101.6
64.1
79.3
96.7
17.9
27.9
37.1
17.6
27.3
36.2
4.8
8.0
11.1
22.4
35.2
47.0
20.8
32.7
43.9
15.4
24.0
31.9
6.2
8.0
9.4
6.2
8.0
9.4
5.4
9.2
13.0
89.8
125.3
159.5
88.3
122.8
155.2
9.4
19.1
29.2
95.6
138.4
181.2
94.9
138.9
180.9
19.8
30.9
41.1
18.3
28.6
38.2
11.2
17.2
22.7
117.3
176.8
234.3
116.5
176.9
231.4
31.8
43.5
53.6
129.4
198.6
262.8
43.9
61.9
77.9
38.2
52.8
65.6
80.0
111.4
139.8
186.3
279.2
367.8
182.1
272.7
356.3
46.1
73.7
99.6
12.6
21.0
29.5
224.4
337.6
444.2
213.2
321.1
421.4
10.9
18.6
26.2
218.9
330.2
433.5
188.8
283.2
371.9
27.6
40.1
51.3
194.4
291.6
382.7
193.9
291.7
381.2
39.2
58.8
76.6
202.3
303.5
396.5
201.9
303.1
396.8
24.7
35.8
45.8
24.6
35.4
45.0
13.0
18.6
23.7
209.0
313.8
410.0
138.9
206.5
269.0
137.9
204.1
266.1
32.0
42.4
51.4
142.4
210.5
273.7
137.0
201.2
261.0
17.9
27.5
36.4
139.8
205.3
266.1
48.7
63.3
75.8
145.3
212.7
274.8
148.4
214.2
273.1
32.6
46.7
59.2
8.9
11.8
14.3
72.1
109.9
144.1
67.4
102.3
134.4
72.8
110.2
144.1
70.9
95.2
124.4
327.9
467.9
585.9
128.4
185.6
237.7
52.1
55.8
59.3
188.1
188.2
188.4
187.5
187.5
187.5
15.4
24.0
31.9
6.2
8.0
9.4
182.0
183.0
184.0
186.0
186.0
186.0
72.8
110.2
144.1
70.9
95.2
124.4
150.0
151.7
153.5
153.55
153.55
153.55

100-Yr
72.7
95.0
87.0
83.3
82.2
169.3
157.6
51.8
198.9
190.0
26.2
11.3
104.8
309.7
65.6
65.6
122.5
116.2
50.0
48.6
15.5
63.6
59.4
43.0
10.9
10.9
18.5
200.3
195.3
44.6
233.4
234.7
55.4
51.8
30.4
306.3
305.1
67.3
346.2
99.7
83.0
178.4
487.3
470.6
136.2
41.7
590.5
558.1
37.4
579.1
493.4
66.7
507.0
505.3
101.3
526.5
524.8
59.5
58.2
30.6
541.5
354.7
351.4
63.4
360.6
343.4
48.7
349.9
92.4
361.0
353.7
76.4
17.6
191.1
178.3
190.9
179.5
749.9
309.7
65.6
188.6
187.5
43.0
10.9
185.2
186.0
190.9
179.5
154.4
153.55

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Characteristics
March 2011
Table 2

Future Conditions (Alternative 1)


Total Area
Watershed (acres)
A
27.0

B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
BB
DD
EE
U+CC

Area
(sq. mi.)

Impervious %Imp. Weighted


CN
(acres)

Tc

Lag Time
(Min)

0.0423

6.6

0.24

73

15

27.7

0.0433

3.7

0.13

68

15

18.1

0.0284

1.8

0.10

66

15

6.8

0.0106

1.1

0.16

77

15

3.1

0.0049

1.1

0.35

75

15

30.9

0.0484

8.6

0.28

79

25

15

20.7

0.0324

6.3

0.30

73

15

17.0

0.0265

2.0

0.12

67

15

6.3

0.0098

0.6

0.09

62

15

14.6

0.0228

3.6

0.25

67

15

8.1

0.0127

0.4

0.05

60

15

28.1

0.0439

4.9

0.17

54

20

12

23.0

0.0359

9.0

0.39

66

25

15

23.0

0.0359

13.6

0.59

78

20

12

10.0

0.0156

2.2

0.22

68

15

16.3

0.0255

8.3

0.51

80

15

26.4

0.0412

15.7

0.59

76

15

17.6

0.0275

0.5

0.03

61

15

49.4

0.0772

2.9

0.06

65

15

16.4

0.0257

2.5

0.15

60

15

19.0

0.0297

5.1

0.27

73

15

31.4

0.0490

14.8

0.47

70

15

17.0

0.0265

5.4

0.32

73

15

8.5

0.0133

1.4

0.16

74

15

23.2

0.0362

7.4

0.32

74

20

12

14.3

0.0223

7.8

0.54

84

15

19.8

0.0310

10.0

0.51

87

15

4.4

0.0068

2.2

0.51

84

20

12

16.0

0.0250

1.0

0.06

68

15.00

144.8

0.2263

33.5

0.46

73

40.00

24

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Time of Concentration Calculation
March 2011

Future Conditions (Alternative 1)


Area A
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA3
Total TcA
Tc Used
Lag Time

840
0.027
2.7
5.2
450
0.044
3.7
2.0
780
0.013
2.0
6.5
13.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area B
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcB1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcB2
Total TcB
Tc Used
Lag Time

840
0.040
3.5
4.0
390
0.026
2.8
2.3
6.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area D
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcD1
Tc Used
Lag Time

660
0.091
5.3
2.1
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area E
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcD1
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.8
1.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area H
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcH1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcH2
Total TcH
Tc Used
Lag Time

360
0.028
2.9
2.1
420
0.024
2.7
2.6
4.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area J
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ4
Total TcJ
Tc Used
Lag Time

210
0.143
5.8
0.6
570
0.018
2.4
4.0
60
0.330
9.0
0.1
300
0.005
1.1
4.5
9.2
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area M
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcM1
Tc Used
Lag Time

2250
0.009
1.7
22.1
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area P
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcP1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.038
3.5
5.0
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area R
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcR1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcR2
Total TcR
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.2
2.0
450
0.022
2.2
3.4
5.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area U
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcU1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcU2
Total TcU
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
1380
0.073
4.2
5.5
22.1
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area X
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcX1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1740
0.014
2.1
13.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area C
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcC1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcC2
Total TcC
Tc Used
Lag Time

300
0.033
3.1
1.6
810
0.031
2.6
5.2
6.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area F
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.6
1.8
2400
0.017
2.2
18.2
150
0.200
7.0
0.4
20.4
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area K
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI2
Total TcI
Tc Used
Lag Time

200
0.167
7.5
0.4
510
0.029
0.9
10.0
10.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area N
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcN1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcN2
Total TcN
Tc Used
Lag Time

1380
0.015
2.1
11.0
1200
0.049
3.7
5.4
16.4
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Q
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcQ1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcQ2
Total TcQ
Tc Used
Lag Time

1110
0.018
2.4
7.7
720
0.028
3.0
4.0
11.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area S
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

420
0.007
1.5
4.7
210
0.238
2.4
1.5
960
0.031
2.6
6.2
12.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area V
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcV1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcV2
Total TcV
Tc Used
Lag Time

450
0.089
1.5
5.0
600
0.050
3.4
2.9
7.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area G
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcG1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcG2
Total TcG
Tc Used
Lag Time

300
0.067
4.5
1.1
870
0.023
2.5
5.8
6.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area I
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI2
Total TcI
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.4
1.9
300
0.033
3.3
1.5
3.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area L
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL4
Total TcL
Tc Used
Lag Time

450
0.044
1.2
6.3
360
0.028
0.9
7.1
420
0.048
1.3
5.4
90
0.440
3.5
0.4
19.1
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area O
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcO1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcO2
Total TcO
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.125
6.0
0.7
810
0.012
1.7
7.9
8.6
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area T
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcT1
Tc Used
Lag Time

750
0.067
1.2
10.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area W
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcW1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcW2
Total TcW
Tc Used
Lag Time

360
0.056
4.5
1.3
1110
0.049
3.4
5.4
6.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Y
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcY1
Tc Used
Lag Time

150
0.133
1.6
1.6
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area Z
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcZ1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area AA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcAA1
Tc Used
Lag Time

570
0.088
5.0
1.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area BB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcBB1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcBB2
Total TcBB
Tc Used
Lag Time

900
0.005
1.3
11.5
750
0.067
4.5
2.8
14.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area CC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcCC1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcCC2
Total TcCC
Tc Used
Lag Time

900
0.005
1.3
11.5
750
0.067
4.5
2.8
14.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area DD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD2
Total TcDD
Tc Used
Lag Time

630
0.032
3.1
3.4
1200
0.005
1.5
13.3
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area EE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD2
Total TcDD
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.250
2.5
1.6
960
0.010
1.5
10.7
12.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area U+CC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcZ1
Tc Used
Lag Time

6000
0.020
2.5
40.0
40.0
0.40

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Muskingum(K) Calculation
March 2011

Future Conditions (Alternative 1)


tA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tA
tA

540
0.005
1.5
6.0
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tB
tB

240
0.005
1.5
2.7
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tC
tC

810
0.025
2.7
5.0
0.1

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD2
Total tD
tD

300
0.025
2.7
1.9
280
0.005
1.2
3.9
5.7
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hour

tE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tE
tE

450
0.011
1.6
4.7
0.08

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tF
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tF
tF

900
0.067
4.5
3.3
0.06

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

450
0.033
3.2
2.3
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tI
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tI2
Total tD
tD

420
0.012
1.5
4.7
90
0.600
12.0
0.1
4.8
0.08

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hour

tG
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tG
tG

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tH
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tH
tH

tJ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tJ
tJ

300
0.100
5.0
1.0
0.02

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tK
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tK
tK

1200
0.033
2.6
7.7
0.13

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tL
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tL
tL

360
0.028
2.5
2.4
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tM
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tM
tM

720
0.014
1.8
6.7
0.11

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tN
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tN
tN

900
0.011
1.6
9.4
0.16

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tO
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tO
tO

1500
0.007
1.2
20.8
0.35

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tO1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tO1
tO1

150
0.005
1.1
2.3
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tP
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tP
tP

300
0.017
2.0
2.5
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tQ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tQ
tQ

450
0.060
3.7
2.0
0.03

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tR
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tR
tR

1650
0.006
1.3
21.2
0.35

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tS
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tS
tS

900
0.011
2.2
6.8
0.11

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tT
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tT
tT

1200
0.005
1.1
18.2
0.30

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tZ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tG
tG

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
April 2011
Table 1

Future Conditions (Alternative 2)


Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)
Hydrologic Element
G
A
Reach-A
B
Reach-B
Junction-1
Reach-C
C
Junction-2
Reach-D
D
E
F
Junction-3
Detention Basin 1
Reach-E
Junction-4
Reach-G
H
Reach-F
I
Junction-21
Reach-Z
J
Detention Basin 2
Reach-H
K
Junction-5
Reach-I
L
Junction-6
Reach-J
M
Reach-K
O
Junction-7
Reach-L
P
Junction-8
Q
N
Junction-9
Junction-10
Reach-M
S
R
Junction-11
Reach-N
U
T
Junction-12
Reach-O
V
Flood Storage
Reach-O1
W
Junction-14
Reach-P
X
Reach-Q
Y
Junction-15
48-36-in Diversion
Reach-S
AA
Junction-16
Reach-T
EE
Junction-17
BB
Junction-18
CC
Z
DD
36-in pipe Junction
Reach-R
Junction-19
Detention Pond 3
Sink-1
Detention Basin 1 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 1 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
Detention Basin 2 (Inflow)
Detention Basin 2 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
Detention Pond 3 (Inflow)
Detention Pond 3 (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)
Flood Storage (Inflow)
Flood Storage (Outflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Spillway Elevation (ft)

Location
Bridge Rd.
Strawberry Hill Rd.

Straw Avenue

Depot Avenue

Locust St.
North Main St.

South Main St.

South Main St.

Elm St.
Hospital Rd.
North Elm St.

48-inch Pipe

Washington St.
Federal St.
Milton St.
Elm St.

Drainage
Area (acres)
20.7
27.1
27.1
27.7
27.7
54.8
54.8
18.2
73.0
73.0
6.8
3.1
31.0
113.9
113.9
113.9
134.6
134.6
17.0
17.0
6.3
23.2
23.2
14.6
14.6
14.6
8.1
180.5
180.5
28.1
208.6
208.6
23.0
23.0
10.0
241.6
241.6
16.3
257.9
26.4
23.0
49.3
307.3
307.3
49.4
17.6
374.3
374.3
68.4
16.4
459.1
459.1
19.0
478.1
478.1
31.4
509.5
509.5
17.0
17.0
8.5
535.0
535.0
535.0
14.3
549.2
549.2
16.0
565.2
19.8
585.1
76.5
23.2
4.4
4.4
4.4
27.5
27.5
689.1
113.9

14.6

27.5

478.1

Tc
15
15

CN
73
73

15

68

15

66

15
15
25

77
75
79

15

67

15

62

15

67

15

60

20

54

25

66

15

68

15

80

15
20

76
78

15
15

65
61

25
15

68
60

15

73

15

70

15

73

15

74

15

84

15

68

15

87

15
20
20

74
74
84

2-Yr
14.4
18.8
17.8
12.2
12.0
29.5
28.1
7.1
33.9
32.6
6.2
2.3
27.0
62.1
30.9
30.2
33.6
32.7
7.4
7.1
1.5
8.6
8.2
6.3
3.5
3.5
1.5
39.1
38.7
1.5
39.7
39.7
7.7
7.2
4.7
47.5
47.4
17.6
55.6
22.5
20.5
42.5
86.2
84.6
17.5
3.7
101.4
96.0
27.7
3.0
120.0
101.4
13.2
12.4
12.4
17.5
17.9
17.9
11.8
12.0
6.3
36.1
36.1
32.9
18.9
47.8
38.4
7.6
42.5
30.1
58.8
57.0
16.1
5.3
5.3
3.9
18.7
17.3
118.7
62.1
30.9
187.1
187.5
6.3
3.5
181.0
186.0
18.7
17.3
148.1
153.55
104.5
12.4
173.7
176.0

10-Yr
30.1
39.4
36.2
29.9
30.2
66.1
61.7
18.0
76.7
72.9
11.8
4.8
49.0
128.4
52.1
52.0
65.9
64.1
17.9
17.6
4.8
22.4
20.8
15.4
6.2
6.2
5.4
89.8
88.3
9.4
95.6
94.9
19.8
18.3
11.2
117.3
116.5
31.8
129.4
43.9
38.2
80.0
186.3
182.1
46.1
12.6
224.4
213.2
66.1
10.9
271.6
230.8
27.6
24.6
24.6
39.2
40.3
40.6
24.7
24.6
13.0
77.6
68.6
65.4
32.0
90.2
74.7
17.9
83.9
48.7
110.1
116.5
32.6
8.9
17.9
9.8
39.4
36.6
249.4
128.4
52.1
188.1
187.5
15.4
6.2
182.0
186.0
39.4
36.6
148.5
153.55
237.1
24.6
174.4
176.0

25-Yr
43.8
57.1
52.2
46.6
46.6
98.7
91.6
28.5
115.3
109.7
16.5
6.9
67.1
185.6
55.8
55.7
82.4
79.3
27.9
27.3
8.0
35.2
32.7
24.0
8.0
8.0
9.2
125.3
122.8
19.1
138.4
138.9
30.9
28.6
17.2
176.8
176.9
43.5
198.6
61.9
52.8
111.4
279.2
272.7
73.7
21.0
337.6
321.1
100.5
18.6
410.0
349.2
40.1
35.0
35.0
58.8
61.1
61.0
35.8
35.4
18.6
114.0
80.2
76.3
42.4
111.3
92.1
27.5
106.8
63.3
147.8
167.5
46.7
11.8
45.7
28.2
66.2
59.2
350.9
185.6
55.8
188.2
187.5
24.0
8.0
183.0
186.0
66.2
59.2
149.4
153.55
357.9
35.0
175
176.0

50-Yr
56.0
73.1
66.9
62.0
61.5
128.4
119.3
38.2
150.4
143.4
20.6
8.7
83.0
237.7
59.3
59.3
101.6
96.7
37.1
36.2
11.1
47.0
43.9
31.9
9.4
9.4
13.0
159.5
155.2
29.2
181.2
180.9
41.1
38.2
22.7
234.3
231.4
53.6
262.8
77.9
65.6
139.8
367.8
356.3
99.6
29.5
444.2
421.4
131.9
26.2
539.3
458.1
51.3
46.0
46.0
76.6
80.4
79.8
45.8
45.0
23.7
147.2
99.5
94.0
51.4
135.7
112.1
36.4
131.7
75.8
182.4
213.1
59.2
14.3
61.9
41.6
88.1
73.0
439
237.7
59.3
188.4
187.5
31.9
9.4
184.0
186.0
88.1
73
150.1
153.55
469.7
46
175.6
176.0

100-Yr
72.7
95.0
87.0
83.3
82.2
169.3
157.6
51.8
198.9
190.0
26.2
11.3
104.8
309.7
65.6
65.6
122.5
116.2
50.0
48.6
15.5
63.6
59.4
43.0
10.9
10.9
18.5
200.3
195.3
44.6
233.4
234.7
55.4
51.8
30.4
306.3
305.1
67.3
346.2
99.7
83.0
178.4
487.3
470.6
136.2
41.7
590.5
558.1
175.6
37.4
718.0
610.4
66.7
71.3
71.3
101.3
107.3
106.2
59.5
58.2
30.6
193.0
128.6
120.8
63.4
171.6
141.7
48.7
167.3
92.4
229.2
275.3
76.4
17.6
82.0
56.7
117.0
84.7
557.1
309.7
65.6
188.6
187.5
43.0
10.9
185.2
186.0
117
84.7
150.9
153.55
626.3
71.3
176.3
176.0

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Characteristics
March 2011
Table 2

Future Conditions (Alternative 2)


Total Area
Watershed (acres)
A
27.0

B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
BB
CC
DD
EE

Area
(sq. mi.)

Impervious %Imp. Weighted


CN
(acres)

Tc

Lag Time
(Min)

0.0423

6.6

0.24

73

15

27.7

0.0433

3.7

0.13

68

15

18.1

0.0284

1.8

0.10

66

15

6.8

0.0106

1.1

0.16

77

15

3.1

0.0049

1.1

0.35

75

15

30.9

0.0484

8.6

0.28

79

25

15

20.7

0.0324

6.3

0.30

73

15

17.0

0.0265

2.0

0.12

67

15

6.3

0.0098

0.6

0.09

62

15

14.6

0.0228

3.6

0.25

67

15

8.1

0.0127

0.4

0.05

60

15

28.1

0.0439

4.9

0.17

54

20

12

23.0

0.0359

9.0

0.39

66

25

15

23.0

0.0359

13.6

0.59

78

20

12

10.0

0.0156

2.2

0.22

68

15

16.3

0.0255

8.3

0.51

80

15

26.4

0.0412

15.7

0.59

76

15

17.6

0.0275

0.5

0.03

61

15

49.4

0.0772

2.9

0.06

65

15

16.4

0.0257

2.5

0.15

60

15

68.4

0.1069

14.5

0.21

68

25

15

19.0

0.0297

5.1

0.27

73

15

31.4

0.0490

14.8

0.47

70

15

17.0

0.0265

5.4

0.32

73

15

8.5

0.0133

1.4

0.16

74

15

23.2

0.0362

7.4

0.32

74

20

12

14.3

0.0223

7.8

0.54

84

15

19.8

0.0310

10.0

0.51

87

15

76.5

0.1195

19.1

0.25

74

15

4.4

0.0068

2.2

0.51

84

20

12

16.0

0.0250

1.0

0.06

68

15.00

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Time of Concentration Calculation
March 2011

Future Conditions (Alternative 2)


Area A
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA3
Total TcA
Tc Used
Lag Time

840
0.027
2.7
5.2
450
0.044
3.7
2.0
780
0.013
2.0
6.5
13.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area B
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcB1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcB2
Total TcB
Tc Used
Lag Time

840
0.040
3.5
4.0
390
0.026
2.8
2.3
6.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area D
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcD1
Tc Used
Lag Time

660
0.091
5.3
2.1
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area E
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcD1
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.8
1.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area H
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcH1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcH2
Total TcH
Tc Used
Lag Time

360
0.028
2.9
2.1
420
0.024
2.7
2.6
4.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area J
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ4
Total TcJ
Tc Used
Lag Time

210
0.143
5.8
0.6
570
0.018
2.4
4.0
60
0.330
9.0
0.1
300
0.005
1.1
4.5
9.2
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area M
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcM1
Tc Used
Lag Time

2250
0.009
1.7
22.1
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area P
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcP1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.038
3.5
5.0
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area R
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcR1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcR2
Total TcR
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.2
2.0
450
0.022
2.2
3.4
5.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area U
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcU1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcU2
Total TcU
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
1380
0.073
4.2
5.5
22.1
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area X
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcX1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1740
0.014
2.1
13.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area C
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcC1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcC2
Total TcC
Tc Used
Lag Time

300
0.033
3.1
1.6
810
0.031
2.6
5.2
6.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area F
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.6
1.8
2400
0.017
2.2
18.2
150
0.200
7.0
0.4
20.4
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area K
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI2
Total TcI
Tc Used
Lag Time

200
0.167
7.5
0.4
510
0.029
0.9
10.0
10.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area N
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcN1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcN2
Total TcN
Tc Used
Lag Time

1380
0.015
2.1
11.0
1200
0.049
3.7
5.4
16.4
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Q
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcQ1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcQ2
Total TcQ
Tc Used
Lag Time

1110
0.018
2.4
7.7
720
0.028
3.0
4.0
11.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area S
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

420
0.007
1.5
4.7
210
0.238
2.4
1.5
960
0.031
2.6
6.2
12.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area V
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcV1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcV2
Total TcV
Tc Used
Lag Time

450
0.089
1.5
5.0
600
0.050
3.4
2.9
7.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area G
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcG1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcG2
Total TcG
Tc Used
Lag Time

300
0.067
4.5
1.1
870
0.023
2.5
5.8
6.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area I
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI2
Total TcI
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.4
1.9
300
0.033
3.3
1.5
3.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area L
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL4
Total TcL
Tc Used
Lag Time

450
0.044
1.2
6.3
360
0.028
0.9
7.1
420
0.048
1.3
5.4
90
0.440
3.5
0.4
19.1
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area O
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcO1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcO2
Total TcO
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.125
6.0
0.7
810
0.012
1.7
7.9
8.6
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area T
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcT1
Tc Used
Lag Time

750
0.067
1.2
10.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area W
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcW1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcW2
Total TcW
Tc Used
Lag Time

360
0.056
4.5
1.3
1110
0.049
3.4
5.4
6.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Y
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcY1
Tc Used
Lag Time

150
0.133
1.6
1.6
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area Z
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcZ1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area AA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcAA1
Tc Used
Lag Time

570
0.088
5.0
1.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area BB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcBB1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcBB2
Total TcBB
Tc Used
Lag Time

900
0.005
1.3
11.5
750
0.067
4.5
2.8
14.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area CC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcCC1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcCC2
Total TcCC
Tc Used
Lag Time

900
0.005
1.3
11.5
750
0.067
4.5
2.8
14.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area DD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD2
Total TcDD
Tc Used
Lag Time

630
0.032
3.1
3.4
1200
0.005
1.5
13.3
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area EE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD2
Total TcDD
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.250
2.5
1.6
960
0.010
1.5
10.7
12.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Muskingum(K) Calculation
March 2011

Future Conditions (Alternative 2)


tA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tA
tA

540
0.005
1.5
6.0
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tB
tB

240
0.005
1.5
2.7
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tC
tC

810
0.025
2.7
5.0
0.1

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD2
Total tD
tD

300
0.025
2.7
1.9
280
0.005
1.2
3.9
5.7
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hour

tE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tE
tE

450
0.011
1.6
4.7
0.08

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tF
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tF
tF

900
0.067
4.5
3.3
0.06

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

450
0.033
3.2
2.3
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tI
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tI2
Total tD
tD

420
0.012
1.5
4.7
90
0.600
12.0
0.1
4.8
0.08

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hour

tG
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tG
tG

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tH
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tH
tH

tJ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tJ
tJ

300
0.100
5.0
1.0
0.02

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tK
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tK
tK

1200
0.033
2.6
7.7
0.13

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tL
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tL
tL

360
0.028
2.5
2.4
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tM
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tM
tM

720
0.014
1.8
6.7
0.11

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tN
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tN
tN

900
0.011
1.6
9.4
0.16

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tO
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tO
tO

1500
0.007
1.2
20.8
0.35

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tO1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tO1
tO1

150
0.005
1.1
2.3
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tP
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tP
tP

300
0.017
2.0
2.5
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tQ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tQ
tQ

450
0.060
3.7
2.0
0.03

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tR
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tR
tR

1650
0.006
1.3
21.2
0.35

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tS
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tS
tS

900
0.011
2.2
6.8
0.11

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tT
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tT
tT

1200
0.005
1.1
18.2
0.30

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tZ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tG
tG

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
April 2011
Table 1

Future Conditions (Alternative 3)


Peak Rate of Runoff (cfs)
Hydrologic Element
G
A
Reach-A
B
Reach-B
Junction-1
Reach-C
C
Junction-2
Reach-D
D
E
F
Junction-3
Detention Basin 1
Reach-E
Junction-4
Reach-G
H
Reach-F
I
Junction-21
Reach-Z
J
Detention Basin 2
Reach-H
K
Junction-5
Reach-I
L
Junction-6
Reach-J
M
Reach-K
O
Junction-7
Reach-L
P
Junction-8
Q
N
Junction-9
Junction-10
Reach-M
S
R
Junction-11
Reach-N
U
T
Junction-12
Reach-O
V
Junction-13
Reach-O1
W
Junction-14
Reach-P
X
Reach-Q
Y
Junction-15
48-36-in Diversion
Reach-S
AA
Junction-16
Reach-T
EE
Junction-17
BB
Junction-18
CC1
Z1
Z3
Junction-20
Z2
DD
36-in pipe Junction
Reach-R
Junction-19
Detention Pond 3
Sink-1

Drainage Area
Location
(acres)
20.7
Bridge Rd.
27.1
27.1
Strawberry Hill Rd.
27.7
27.7
54.8
54.8
18.2
73.0
73.0
6.8
3.1
Straw Avenue
31.0
113.9
113.9
113.9
134.6
134.6
17.0
17.0
6.3
23.2
23.2
14.6
14.6
14.6
8.1
180.5
180.5
28.1
208.6
208.6
Depot Avenue
23.0
23.0
10.0
241.6
241.6
16.3
257.9
Locust St.
26.4
North Main St.
23.0
49.3
307.3
307.3
South Main St.
49.4
17.6
374.3
374.3
South Main St.
68.4
16.4
459.1
459.1
Elm St.
19.0
478.1
478.1
Hospital Rd.
31.4
509.5
509.5
North Elm St.
17.0
17.0
8.5
535.0
535.0
535.0
48-inch Pipe
14.3
549.2
549.2
16.0
565.2
Washington St.
19.8
585.1
Federal St.
67.7
Federal St.
16.5
8.8
93.0
Milton St.
13.3
Elm St.
4.4
4.4
4.4
17.7
17.7
695.7

Tc
15
15

CN
73
73

15

68

15

66

15
15
25

77
75
79

15

67

15

62

15

67

15

60

20

54

25

66

15

68

15

80

15
20

76
78

15
15

65
61

25
15

68
60

15

73

15

70

15

73

15

74

15

84

15

68

15

87

15
15
15

74
73
74

20
20

73
84

2-Yr
14.4
18.8
17.8
12.2
12.0
29.5
28.1
7.1
33.9
32.6
6.2
2.3
27.0
62.1
30.9
30.2
33.6
32.7
7.4
7.1
1.5
8.6
8.2
6.3
3.5
3.5
1.5
39.1
38.7
1.5
39.7
39.7
7.7
7.2
4.7
47.5
47.4
17.6
55.6
22.5
20.5
42.5
86.2
84.6
17.5
3.7
101.4
96.0
27.7
3.0
120.0
101.4
13.2
104.5
104.6
17.5
109.1
108.8
11.8
12.0
6.3
113.2
79.6
78.8
18.9
82.0
79.3
7.6
80.8
30.1
84.6
50.4
11.4
6.5
68.4
8.6
5.3
34.8
30.7
32.4
31.8
131.4

10-Yr
30.1
39.4
36.2
29.9
30.2
66.1
61.7
18.0
76.7
72.9
11.8
4.8
49.0
128.4
52.1
52.0
65.9
64.1
17.9
17.6
4.8
22.4
20.8
15.4
6.2
6.2
5.4
89.8
88.3
9.4
95.6
94.9
19.8
18.3
11.2
117.3
116.5
31.8
129.4
43.9
38.2
80.0
186.3
182.1
46.1
12.6
224.4
213.2
66.1
10.9
271.6
230.8
27.6
237.1
236.1
39.2
245.6
245.4
24.7
24.6
13.0
253.2
167.3
165.9
32.0
170.9
162.9
17.9
165.8
48.7
171.6
103.1
24.0
13.4
140.5
17.9
8.9
88.0
81.4
84.7
76.9
278.1

25-Yr
43.8
57.1
52.2
46.6
46.6
98.7
91.6
28.5
115.3
109.7
16.5
6.9
67.1
185.6
55.8
55.7
82.4
79.3
27.9
27.3
8.0
35.2
32.7
24.0
8.0
8.0
9.2
125.3
122.8
19.1
138.4
138.9
30.9
28.6
17.2
176.8
176.9
43.5
198.6
61.9
52.8
111.4
279.2
272.7
73.7
21.0
337.6
321.1
100.5
18.6
410.0
349.2
40.1
357.9
357.7
58.8
371.0
369.4
35.8
35.4
18.6
381.6
250.5
247.6
42.4
254.4
241.4
27.5
245.5
63.3
253.1
148.3
34.9
19.2
202.3
25.9
11.8
134.1
123.9
128.4
104.1
406.7

50-Yr
56.0
73.1
66.9
62.0
61.5
128.4
119.3
38.2
150.4
143.4
20.6
8.7
83.0
237.7
59.3
59.3
101.6
96.7
37.1
36.2
11.1
47.0
43.9
31.9
9.4
9.4
13.0
159.5
155.2
29.2
181.2
180.9
41.1
38.2
22.7
234.3
231.4
53.6
262.8
77.9
65.6
139.8
367.8
356.3
99.6
29.5
444.2
421.4
131.9
26.2
539.3
458.1
51.3
469.7
470.1
76.6
486.7
485.9
45.8
45.0
23.7
500.9
328.1
324.0
51.4
332.5
314.5
36.4
319.9
75.8
329.1
188.6
44.6
24.4
257.7
33.0
14.3
176.4
162.6
168.5
148.3
517.6

100-Yr
72.7
95.0
87.0
83.3
82.2
169.3
157.6
51.8
198.9
190.0
26.2
11.3
104.8
309.7
65.6
65.6
122.5
116.2
50.0
48.6
15.5
63.6
59.4
43.0
10.9
10.9
18.5
200.3
195.3
44.6
233.4
234.7
55.4
51.8
30.4
306.3
305.1
67.3
346.2
99.7
83.0
178.4
487.3
470.6
136.2
41.7
590.5
558.1
175.6
37.4
718.0
610.4
66.7
626.3
624.5
101.3
645.7
646.7
59.5
58.2
30.6
665.6
436.0
431.1
63.4
441.5
416.9
48.7
423.8
92.4
434.8
243.7
57.9
31.6
333.2
42.8
17.6
233.9
215.9
223.5
207.3
677.3

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Characteristics
March 2011
Table 2

Future Conditions (Alternative 3)


Total Area
Watershed (acres)
A
27.0

B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z1
Z2
Z3
AA
BB
CC1
DD
EE

Area
(sq. mi.)

Impervious %Imp. Weighted


CN
(acres)

Tc

Lag Time
(Min)

0.0423

6.6

0.24

73

15

27.7

0.0433

3.7

0.13

68

15

18.1

0.0284

1.8

0.10

66

15

6.8

0.0106

1.1

0.16

77

15

3.1

0.0049

1.1

0.35

75

15

30.9

0.0484

8.6

0.28

79

25

15

20.7

0.0324

6.3

0.30

73

15

17.0

0.0265

2.0

0.12

67

15

6.3

0.0098

0.6

0.09

62

15

14.6

0.0228

3.6

0.25

67

15

8.1

0.0127

0.4

0.05

60

15

28.1

0.0439

4.9

0.17

54

20

12

23.0

0.0359

9.0

0.39

66

25

15

23.0

0.0359

13.6

0.59

78

20

12

10.0

0.0156

2.2

0.22

68

15

16.3

0.0255

8.3

0.51

80

15

26.4

0.0412

15.7

0.59

76

15

17.6

0.0275

0.5

0.03

61

15

49.4

0.0772

2.9

0.06

65

15

16.4

0.0257

2.5

0.15

60

15

68.4

0.1069

14.5

0.21

68

25

15

19.0

0.0297

5.1

0.27

73

15

31.4

0.0490

14.8

0.47

70

15

17.0

0.0265

5.4

0.32

73

15

8.5

0.0133

1.4

0.16

74

15

16.5

0.0258

5.2

0.32

73

15

13.3

0.0208

4.0

0.32

73

20

12

8.8

0.0137

1.6

0.32

74

15

14.3

0.0223

7.8

0.54

84

15

19.8

0.0310

10.0

0.51

87

15

67.7

0.1058

19.1

0.25

74

15

4.4

0.0068

2.2

0.51

84

20

12

16.0

0.0250

1.0

0.06

68

15.00

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Time of Concentration Calculation
March 2011

Future Conditions (Alternative 3)


Area A
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcA3
Total TcA
Tc Used
Lag Time

840
0.027
2.7
5.2
450
0.044
3.7
2.0
780
0.013
2.0
6.5
13.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area B
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcB1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcB2
Total TcB
Tc Used
Lag Time

840
0.040
3.5
4.0
390
0.026
2.8
2.3
6.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area D
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcD1
Tc Used
Lag Time

660
0.091
5.3
2.1
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area E
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcD1
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.8
1.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area H
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcH1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcH2
Total TcH
Tc Used
Lag Time

360
0.028
2.9
2.1
420
0.024
2.7
2.6
4.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area J
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcJ4
Total TcJ
Tc Used
Lag Time

210
0.143
5.8
0.6
570
0.018
2.4
4.0
60
0.330
9.0
0.1
300
0.005
1.1
4.5
9.2
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area M
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcM1
Tc Used
Lag Time

2250
0.009
1.7
22.1
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area P
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcP1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.038
3.5
5.0
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area R
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcR1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcR2
Total TcR
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.2
2.0
450
0.022
2.2
3.4
5.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area U
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcU1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcU2
Total TcU
Tc Used
Lag Time

1500
0.007
1.5
16.7
1380
0.073
4.2
5.5
22.1
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area X
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcX1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1740
0.014
2.1
13.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area CC1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcCC1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcCC2
Total TcCC
Tc Used
Lag Time

900
0.005
1.3
11.5
750
0.067
4.5
2.8
14.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Z1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcZ1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1050
0.005
1.2
14.6
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area Z3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity

870 ft
0.005 ft/ft
1.2 fps

Area G
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcG1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcG2
Total TcG
Tc Used
Lag Time

300
0.067
4.5
1.1
870
0.023
2.5
5.8
6.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area I
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI2
Total TcI
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.4
1.9
300
0.033
3.3
1.5
3.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area L
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL3
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcL4
Total TcL
Tc Used
Lag Time

450
0.044
1.2
6.3
360
0.028
0.9
7.1
420
0.048
1.3
5.4
90
0.440
3.5
0.4
19.1
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area O
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcO1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcO2
Total TcO
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.125
6.0
0.7
810
0.012
1.7
7.9
8.6
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area T
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcT1
Tc Used
Lag Time

750
0.067
1.2
10.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area W
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcW1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcW2
Total TcW
Tc Used
Lag Time

360
0.056
4.5
1.3
1110
0.049
3.4
5.4
6.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Y
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcY1
Tc Used
Lag Time

150
0.133
1.6
1.6
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area BB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcBB1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcBB2
Total TcBB
Tc Used
Lag Time

900
0.005
1.3
11.5
750
0.067
4.5
2.8
14.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area EE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD2
Total TcDD
Tc Used
Lag Time

240
0.250
2.5
1.6
960
0.010
1.5
10.7
12.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area C
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcC1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcC2
Total TcC
Tc Used
Lag Time

300
0.033
3.1
1.6
810
0.031
2.6
5.2
6.8
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area F
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcF3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

510
0.078
4.6
1.8
2400
0.017
2.2
18.2
150
0.200
7.0
0.4
20.4
25.0
0.25

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area K
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcI2
Total TcI
Tc Used
Lag Time

200
0.167
7.5
0.4
510
0.029
0.9
10.0
10.4
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area N
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcN1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcN2
Total TcN
Tc Used
Lag Time

1380
0.015
2.1
11.0
1200
0.049
3.7
5.4
16.4
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Q
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcQ1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcQ2
Total TcQ
Tc Used
Lag Time

1110
0.018
2.4
7.7
720
0.028
3.0
4.0
11.7
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area S
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcS3
Total TcF
Tc Used
Lag Time

420
0.007
1.5
4.7
210
0.238
2.4
1.5
960
0.031
2.6
6.2
12.3
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area V
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcV1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcV2
Total TcV
Tc Used
Lag Time

450
0.089
1.5
5.0
600
0.050
3.4
2.9
7.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area AA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcAA1
Tc Used
Lag Time

570
0.088
5.0
1.9
15.0
0.15

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Area DD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcDD2
Total TcDD
Tc Used
Lag Time

630
0.032
3.1
3.4
1200
0.005
1.5
13.3
16.7
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
min
hr

Area Z2
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
TcZ1
Tc Used
Lag Time

1440
0.007
1.4
17.1
20.0
0.20

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hr

Elm Street Brook Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Muskingum(K) Calculation
March 2011

Future Conditions (Alternative 3)


tA
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tA
tA

540
0.005
1.5
6.0
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tB
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tB
tB

240
0.005
1.5
2.7
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tC
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tC
tC

810
0.025
2.7
5.0
0.1

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tD
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tD2
Total tD
tD

300
0.025
2.7
1.9
280
0.005
1.2
3.9
5.7
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hour

tE
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tE
tE

450
0.011
1.6
4.7
0.08

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tF
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tF
tF

900
0.067
4.5
3.3
0.06

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

450
0.033
3.2
2.3
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tI
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tI1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tI2
Total tD
tD

420
0.012
1.5
4.7
90
0.600
12.0
0.1
4.8
0.08

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
ft
ft/ft
fps
min
min
hour

tG
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tG
tG

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tH
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tH
tH

tJ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tJ
tJ

300
0.100
5.0
1.0
0.02

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tK
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tK
tK

1200
0.033
2.6
7.7
0.13

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tL
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tL
tL

360
0.028
2.5
2.4
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tM
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tM
tM

720
0.014
1.8
6.7
0.11

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tN
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tN
tN

900
0.011
1.6
9.4
0.16

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tO
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tO
tO

1500
0.007
1.2
20.8
0.35

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tO1
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tO1
tO1

150
0.005
1.1
2.3
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tP
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tP
tP

300
0.017
2.0
2.5
0.04

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tQ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tQ
tQ

450
0.060
3.7
2.0
0.03

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tR
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tR
tR

1650
0.006
1.3
21.2
0.35

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tS
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tS
tS

900
0.011
2.2
6.8
0.11

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tT
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tT
tT

1200
0.005
1.1
18.2
0.30

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

tZ
Hydraulic Length
Slope
*Velocity
tG
tG

480
0.005
1.3
6.2
0.10

ft
ft/ft
fps
min
hour

King Street/Market Street Area Drainage Analysis

King Street Watershed Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
May 2011
Existing Conditions

Hydrologic Element
KS-E
KS-F
J-1
KS-G
King 36"
J-2
King 48"
KS-I
J-3
Div. at North St
King 48"/54"
KS-J
KS-K
KS-L
KS-M
J-8
Trumbull 24"
J-7
King 54"
KS-Q
J-9
King 54"/66"
KS-R
J-10
Div. at Main St
King 60"/66"
KS-T
J-12
King Street Old Mill River
KS-U
Old Mill River
KS-A
Brook Rail Trail
KS-B
J-4
Brook Woodmont Rd
KS-D
KS-C
J-5
Market 48"
KS-H
J-6
Market 44"/48"
KS-O
KS-P
KS-N
Market 18"/21"
J-11
Market 72"
KS-S
J-13
Market 82"
KS-W
KS-V
J-14
Market 60"
KS-X
J-15
Market Street Old Mill River

Location

King Street @ Church Street


King Street @ Finn Street

King Street @ North Street

Trumbull @ State Street


King Street @ Trumbull Road

King Street @ Strong Ave


King Street @ Pleasant Street
Hampton Avenue
Culvert @ Bikeway
Culvert @ Woodmont Road

Old Market Street @ Highland Avenue


Old Market Street @ North Street

Market Street @ Walnut Street


Old Market Street @ Bridge Street
Old Market Street @ Hancock Street

Old Market Street @ Holyoke Street


Old Market Street @ Hockanum Road

Drainage Area
(mi2)
(ac)
0.0302
19.3
0.0278
17.8
0.0580
37.1
0.0394
25.2
0.0580
37.1
0.0973
62.3
0.0973
62.3
0.0249
16.0
0.1223
78.3
0.1223
78.3
0.1223
78.3
0.0258
16.5
0.0324
20.7
0.0425
27.2
0.0070
4.5
0.0820
52.4
52.4
0.0820
0.2300
147.2
0.2300
147.2
0.0386
24.7
0.2686
171.9
0.2686
171.9
0.0230
14.7
0.2916
186.6
0.2916
186.6
0.2916
186.6
0.0164
10.5
0.3079
197.1
0.3079
197.1
0.0119
7.6
0.0119
7.6
0.0707
45.2
0.0707
45.2
18.7
0.0293
0.0999
63.9
0.0999
63.9
0.0233
14.9
0.0145
9.3
0.1377
88.1
0.1377
88.1
0.0097
6.2
0.1474
94.4
0.1474
94.4
0.0480
30.7
0.0065
4.2
0.0357
22.8
0.0357
22.8
0.2376
152.1
0.2376
152.1
0.0370
23.7
0.2746
175.8
0.2746
175.8
0.0151
9.7
0.0049
3.1
0.2947
188.6
0.2947
188.6
0.0058
3.7
0.3004
192.3
0.3004
192.3

Tc
19
15

CN
95
83

15

87

15

92

15
15
15
15

89
88
85
84

15

94

15

96

15

97

15

95

34

78

27

75

31
15

92
83

15

89

19
20
26

89
90
82

16

89

15
15

90
96

15

85

2-year

10-year

25-year

100-year

(cfs)
46.8
31.8
78.3
52.5
73.3
100.4
98.9
38.8
114.3
114.3
112.8
36.7
44.6
52.7
8.4
105.7
103.8
184.0
183.2
63.1
229.7
225.1
39.1
243.0
232.8
218.0
28.4
221.9
221.9
19.9
19.9
47.1
45.4
18.7
53.3
52.9
27.8
16.6
66.5
66.0
13.8
68.9
68.0
63.5
8.7
32.1
29.7
137.1
120.5
51.7
133.3
128.6
22.2
8.4
133.6
130.5
7.1
131.5
131.5

(cfs)
56.7
41.6
97.8
66.6
91.6
125.6
123.9
47.8
142.9
142.9
141.2
46.0
56.3
67.9
10.9
135.0
132.6
234.0
232.8
76.9
289.7
283.8
47.2
305.4
235.4
229.4
34.1
234.9
234.9
24.1
24.1
64.1
61.8
26.2
72.5
72.1
34.3
21.7
89.0
88.3
17.3
90.8
89.9
79.6
10.9
42.3
39.2
193.5
189.3
64.8
199.2
198.0
27.7
10.1
202.7
202.2
9.2
203.3
203.3

(cfs)
70.4
55.4
125.2
86.5
117.2
161.1
158.8
60.2
182.9
182.9
181.0
59.0
72.6
89.2
14.4
176.2
173.0
304.1
302.4
95.9
373.8
366.1
58.4
392.8
285.2
282.5
42.0
289.1
289.1
30.0
30.0
88.8
85.5
37.2
100.6
99.9
43.3
29.0
121.5
120.7
22.2
123.6
122.5
102.1
13.9
56.8
52.6
263.0
260.9
83.2
272.2
271.2
35.3
12.5
276.6
275.7
12.1
277.0
277.0

(cfs)
97.7
83.4
180.0
126.2
168.4
232.0
228.8
84.9
263.0
183.1
183.1
84.9
105.2
132.2
21.5
258.9
253.8
443.9
441.4
133.7
541.7
529.8
80.6
567.1
285.2
285.2
57.8
296.8
296.8
41.6
41.6
139.9
134.7
60.4
158.7
157.7
61.0
43.6
188.8
187.4
31.9
264.6
255.6
146.7
19.8
86.4
80.0
543.3
534.9
119.5
558.2
553.7
50.4
17.2
563.1
558.5
17.9
560.6
560.6

King Street Watershed Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
May 2011
Proposed Conditions

Hydrologic Element
KS-E
KS-F
J-1
KS-G
King 36"
J-2
King 48"
KS-I
J-3
Div. at North St
King 48"/54"
KS-J
KS-K
KS-L
KS-M
J-8
Trumbull 24"
J-7
King 54"
KS-Q
J-9
King 54"/66"
KS-R
J-10
Div. at Main St
King 60"/66"
KS-T
J-12
King Street Old Mill River
KS-U
Old Mill River
KS-A
Brook Rail Trail
KS-B
J-4
Brook Woodmont Rd
KS-D
KS-C
J-5
Market 48"
KS-H
J-6
Market 44"/48"
KS-O
KS-P
KS-N
Market 18"/21"
J-11
Market 72"
KS-S
J-13
Market 82"
KS-W
KS-V
J-14
Market 60"
KS-X
J-15
Market Street Old Mill River

Location

King Street @ Church Street


King Street @ Finn Street

King Street @ North Street

Trumbull @ State Street


King Street @ Trumbull Road

King Street @ Strong Ave


King Street @ Pleasant Street
Hampton Avenue
Culvert @ Bikeway
Culvert @ Woodmont Road

Old Market Street @ Highland Avenue


Old Market Street @ North Street

Market Street @ Walnut Street


Old Market Street @ Bridge Street
Old Market Street @ Hancock Street

Old Market Street @ Holyoke Street


Old Market Street @ Hockanum Road

Drainage Area
(mi2)
(ac)
0.0302
19.3
0.0278
17.8
0.0580
37.1
0.0394
25.2
0.0580
37.1
0.0973
62.3
0.0973
62.3
0.0249
16.0
0.1223
78.3
0.1223
78.3
0.1223
78.3
0.0258
16.5
0.0324
20.7
0.0425
27.2
0.0070
4.5
0.0820
52.4
52.4
0.0820
0.2300
147.2
0.2300
147.2
0.0386
24.7
0.2686
171.9
0.2686
171.9
0.0230
14.7
0.2916
186.6
0.2916
186.6
0.2916
186.6
0.0164
10.5
0.3079
197.1
0.3079
197.1
0.0119
7.6
0.0119
7.6
0.0707
45.2
0.0707
45.2
18.7
0.0293
0.0999
63.9
0.0999
63.9
0.0233
14.9
0.0145
9.3
0.1377
88.1
0.1377
88.1
0.0097
6.2
0.1474
94.4
0.1474
94.4
0.0480
30.7
0.0065
4.2
0.0357
22.8
0.0357
22.8
0.2376
152.1
0.2376
152.1
0.0370
23.7
0.2746
175.8
0.2746
175.8
0.0151
9.7
0.0049
3.1
0.2947
188.6
0.2947
188.6
0.0058
3.7
0.3004
192.3
0.3004
192.3

Tc
19
15

CN
95
83

15

87

15

92

15
15
15
15

89
88
85
84

15

94

15

96

15

97

15

95

34

78

27

75

31
15

92
83

15

89

19
20
26

89
90
82

16

89

15
15

90
96

15

85

2-year

10-year

25-year

100-year

(cfs)
46.8
34.4
80.8
52.5
75.7
102.8
101.2
38.8
116.7
116.7
115.0
36.7
44.6
56.6
9.1
110.3
108.3
188.9
188.0
63.1
234.7
229.9
39.1
247.8
234.2
217.5
28.4
221.2
221.2
19.9
19.9
51.7
49.8
19.7
58.0
57.7
27.8
18.0
71.4
70.9
15.1
72.8
72.2
69.4
8.7
32.1
29.7
144.3
135.5
56.5
149.1
144.2
24.8
8.4
149.4
145.9
8.2
147.0
147.0

(cfs)
56.7
44.3
100.5
66.6
94.0
128.2
126.4
47.8
145.4
145.4
143.5
46.0
56.3
71.9
11.6
139.8
137.3
239.2
237.8
76.9
295.0
288.9
47.2
310.5
239.0
232.7
34.1
238.2
238.2
24.1
24.1
69.1
66.6
27.3
77.8
77.3
34.3
23.2
94.4
93.7
18.6
96.1
95.3
85.4
10.9
42.3
39.2
199.2
195.8
69.6
206.1
205.0
30.2
10.1
210.3
209.7
10.3
211.0
211.0

(cfs)
70.4
58.2
127.9
86.5
119.7
163.7
161.4
60.2
185.5
183.1
182.5
59.0
72.6
93.4
15.1
181.2
177.8
309.4
307.7
95.9
379.3
371.4
58.4
398.1
285.2
283.2
42.0
289.8
289.8
30.0
30.0
94.3
90.8
38.5
106.4
105.7
43.3
30.4
127.5
126.6
23.4
129.6
128.4
107.7
13.9
56.8
52.6
269.9
267.6
87.7
281.4
279.6
37.6
12.5
287.4
286.1
13.2
287.8
287.8

(cfs)
97.7
86.3
182.8
126.2
171.0
234.7
231.4
84.9
265.6
183.1
183.1
84.9
105.2
136.3
22.2
263.7
258.5
449.1
446.6
133.7
547.1
535.0
80.6
572.3
285.2
285.2
57.8
297.0
297.0
41.6
41.6
146.0
140.5
61.9
165.0
164.0
61.0
45.1
195.3
193.8
33.0
272.0
262.8
151.8
19.8
86.4
80.0
554.9
546.3
123.6
570.1
565.5
52.5
17.2
575.3
570.4
19.0
572.6
572.6

Northampton - King Street Watershed Time of Concentration


Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
147
137
136
133.93

Flow Path for Area A


Elevation 2
(ft)
137
136
133.93
127

Length
(ft)
400.0
300.0
300.0
390.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.025
0.003
0.007
0.018

Land Use
short grass
heavy wooded
grassed waterway
grassed waterway

V
(fps)
1.2
0.23
1.3
2

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
141
138
127.95

2063
34
34

Flow Path for Area B


Elevation 2
(ft)
138
127
125.65

Length
(ft)
100.0
200.0
950.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.030
0.055
0.002

Land Use
heavy wooded
grassed waterway
grassed waterway

V
(fps)
0.725
3.5
0.675

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
141
137
124

Elevation 1
(ft)
147

T
(s)
137.9
57.1
1407.4
1602
27
27

Flow Path for Area C


Elevation 2
(ft)
137
124
122

Length
(ft)
750.0
250.0
200.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.005
0.052
0.010

Land Use

V
(fps)

residential
grassed waterway
pavement

1.3
3.4
2

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:

T
(s)
333.3
1304.3
230.8
195.0

T
(s)
576.9
73.5
100.0
750
13
15

Flow Path for Area D


Elevation 2
(ft)
143

Length
(ft)
1650.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.002

Land Use
pavement
Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

V
(fps)
0.9

T
(s)
1833.3
1833
31
31

Northampton - King Street Watershed Time of Concentration


Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
147.15

Flow Path for Area E


Elevation 2
(ft)
139.04

Length
(ft)
1600.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.005

Land Use

V
(fps)

pavement

1.4

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
176
145

1143
19
19

Flow Path for Area F


Elevation 2
(ft)
145
139

Length
(ft)
770.0
680.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.040
0.009

Land Use

V
(fps)

residential
pavement

3.5
1.9

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
167
149

Elevation 1
(ft)
140

T
(s)
220.0
357.9
578
10
15

Flow Path for Area G


Elevation 2
(ft)
149
138.62

Length
(ft)
600.0
620.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.030
0.017

Land Use

V
(fps)

residential
pavement

3
2.6

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:

T
(s)
1142.9

T
(s)
200.0
238.5
438
7
15

Flow Path for Area H


Elevation 2
(ft)
129.39

Length
(ft)
1000.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.011

Land Use
pavement
Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

V
(fps)
2.1

T
(s)
476.2
476
8
15

Northampton - King Street Watershed Time of Concentration


Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
150
138.21

Flow Path for Area I


Elevation 2
(ft)
138.21
134.82

Length
(ft)
480.0
500.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.025
0.007

Land Use
residential
pavement

V
(fps)
2.75
1.7

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
150
138.21

469
8
15

Flow Path for Area J


Elevation 2
(ft)
138.21
134.82

Length
(ft)
600.0
500.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.020
0.007

Land Use

V
(fps)

residential
pavement

2.5
1.7

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
196
187
149.34

Elevation 1
(ft)
205
196
190
187

T
(s)
240.0
294.1
534
9
15

Flow Path for Area K


Elevation 2
(ft)
187
147
148.6

Length
(ft)
410.0
360.0
370.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.022
0.111
0.002

Land Use

V
(fps)

residential
residential
pavement

2.6
5
0.9

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:

T
(s)
174.5
294.1

T
(s)
157.7
72.0
411.1
641
11
15

Flow Path for Area L


Elevation 2
(ft)
196
190
187
148.6

Length
(ft)
460.0
100.0
330.0
400.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.020
0.060
0.009
0.096

Land Use
short grass
short grass
pavement
pavement
Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

V
(fps)
1
1.7
1.9
6.25

T
(s)
460.0
58.8
173.7
64.0
757
13
15

Northampton - King Street Watershed Time of Concentration


Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
182
150

Flow Path for Area M


Elevation 2
(ft)
150
148.6

Length
(ft)
300.0
700.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.107
0.002

Land Use

V
(fps)

residential
pavement

T
(s)
6
0.9

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
138
135.46
128.81

828
14
15

Flow Path for Area N


Elevation 2
(ft)
135.46
128.81
128.51

Length
(ft)
530.0
800.0
100.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.005
0.008
0.003

Land Use
short grass
pavement
pavement

V
(fps)
0.5
1.9
1.25

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
137.7
130.08

Elevation 1
(ft)
137.6
135

T
(s)
1060.0
421.1
80.0
1561
26
26

Flow Path for Area O


Elevation 2
(ft)
130.08
126.9

Length
(ft)
1000.0
700.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.008
0.005

Land Use

V
(fps)

residential
pavement

1.6
1.4

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:

50.0
777.8

T
(s)
625.0
500.0
1125
19
19

Flow Path for Area P


Elevation 2
(ft)
135
124

Length
(ft)
950.0
600.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.003
0.018

Land Use
residential
residential
Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

V
(fps)
1
2.4

T
(s)
950.0
250.0
1200
20
20

Northampton - King Street Watershed Time of Concentration


Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
147
137

Flow Path for Area Q


Elevation 2
(ft)
137
131.67

Length
(ft)
650.0
350.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.015
0.015

Land Use

V
(fps)

pavement
pavement

2.5
2.5

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
137
127
125.82

T
(s)
260.0
140.0
400
7
15

Flow Path for Area S


Elevation 2
(ft)
127
125.82
123.195

Length
(ft)
650.0
150.0
750.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.015
0.008
0.004

Land Use
residential
pavement
pavement
Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

V
(fps)
2.2
1.8
1.3

T
(s)
295.5
83.3
576.9
956
16
16

Northampton - King Street Watershed Muskingum Routing


King Street 36"
Elevation 1
(ft)
139.04

Elevation 2
(ft)
138.62

Length
(ft)
640.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.001

Land Use
pavement

V
(fps)
0.675

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
948.1
948
16
0.263

King Street 48"


Elevation 1
(ft)
138.62

Elevation 2
(ft)
134.82

Length
(ft)
620.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.006

Land Use
pavement

V
(fps)
1.6

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
387.5
388
6
0.108

Brook Rail Trail


Elevation 1
(ft)
127.95

Elevation 2
(ft)
125.65

Length
(ft)
950.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.002

Land Use
grassed waterway

V
(fps)
0.675

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
1407.4
1407
23
0.391

Brook Woodmont Road


Elevation 1
(ft)
126.64
124

Elevation 2
(ft)
124
122

Length
(ft)
350.0
200.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.008
0.010

Land Use
grassed waterway
pavement
Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

10

V
(fps)
1.35
2

T
(s)
259.3
100.0
359
6
0.100

Northampton - King Street Watershed Muskingum Routing


Market 48"
Elevation 1
(ft)
122.45

Elevation 2
(ft)
121.15

Length
(ft)
650.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.002

Land Use

V
(fps)

pavement

0.9

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
722.2
722
12
0.201

King Street 48"/54"


Elevation 1
(ft)
134.82

Elevation 2
(ft)
134.7

Length
(ft)
700.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.000

Land Use

V
(fps)

pavement

0.7

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
1000.0
1000
17
0.278

Trumbull Road
Elevation 1
(ft)
148.6

Elevation 2
(ft)
134.7

Length
(ft)
700.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.020

Land Use

V
(fps)

pavement

2.8

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
250.0
250
4
0.069

Market 44"/48"
Elevation 1
(ft)
137.6
135

Elevation 2
(ft)
135
124

Length
(ft)
950.0
600.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.003
0.018

Land Use
residential
residential

V
(fps)
1
2.4

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
950.0
250.0
1200
20
0.333

Market 18"/21"
Elevation 1
(ft)
128.81

Elevation 2
(ft)
126.9

Length
(ft)
1300.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.001

Land Use
pavement
Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

11

V
(fps)
0.675

T
(s)
1925.9
1926
32
0.535

Northampton - King Street Watershed Muskingum Routing


King Street 54"
Elevation 1
(ft)
134.7

Elevation 2
(ft)
134

Length
(ft)
250.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.003

Land Use

V
(fps)

pavement

1.3

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
192.3
192
3
0.053

King 54"/66"
Elevation 1
(ft)
134
129.8

Elevation 2
(ft)
129.8
125

Length
(ft)
600.0
550.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.007
0.009

Land Use

V
(fps)

pavement
pavement

1.7
1.9

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
352.9
289.5
642
11
0.178

King 60"/66"
Elevation 1
(ft)
126.6
126.2

Elevation 2
(ft)
126.2
123

Length
(ft)
600.0
550.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.001
0.006

0.049962825

Land Use

V
(fps)

pavement
pavement

0.7
1.6

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
857.1
343.8
1201
20
0.334

Market 72"
Elevation 1
(ft)
115.72

Elevation 2
(ft)
112

Length
(ft)
1050.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.004

0.074285714

Land Use
pavement
Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

12

V
(fps)
1.3

T
(s)
807.7
808
13
0.224

Northampton - King Street Watershed Muskingum Routing


Market 82"
Elevation 1
(ft)
112

Elevation 2
(ft)
108.05

Length
(ft)
800.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.005

0.105

Land Use

V
(fps)

pavement

1.4

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
571.4
571
10
0.159

Market 60"
Elevation 1
(ft)
108.05

Elevation 2
(ft)
101.5

Length
(ft)
850.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.008

0.098823529

Land Use
pavement
Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

13

V
(fps)
1.4

T
(s)
607.1
607
10
0.169

King Street/Main Street Relief Pipe System


Main Pipe Diversion
Pipe Diam.

(in)
(ft)

Area (ft2)
Manning's n
Bottom of Pipe
Top of Pipe
Slope
Qfull (cfs)
Centerline El.
Rim Elevation
Cd (for orifices)
Weir Length (ft)

60
5
19.63
0.013
113.40
118.40
0.006
202.28
115.90
125.00
0.6
55

36
3
7.07
0.013
116.37
119.37
0.005
47.29
117.87
125.00
0.6
50

Elevation

(ft)
113.4
113.6
113.8
114.0
114.2
114.4
114.6
114.8
115.0
115.2
115.4
115.6
115.8
116.0
116.2
116.4
116.6
116.8
117.0
117.2
117.4
117.6
117.8
118.0
118.2
118.4
118.6
118.8
119.0
119.2
119.4
119.6
119.8
120.0
120.2
120.4
120.6
120.8

Manning's Flow
d/D
Q/Qfull
Q
(cfs)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.01
2.02
0.08
0.02
4.05
0.12
0.03
6.07
0.16
0.04
8.09
0.20
0.06
12.14
0.24
0.1
20.23
0.28
0.13
26.30
0.32
0.16
32.36
0.36
0.21
42.48
0.40
0.26
52.59
0.44
0.33
66.75
0.48
0.375
75.85
0.52
0.43
86.98
0.56
0.485
98.10
0.60
0.55
111.25
0.64
0.6
121.37
0.68
0.67
135.52
0.72
0.74
149.68
0.76
0.82
165.87
0.80
0.87
175.98
0.84
0.92
186.09
0.88
0.975
197.22
0.92
1
202.28
0.96
1.03
208.34
1.00
1
202.28

60 in Pipe - Main System


Orifice Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

2.70
2.90
3.10
3.30
3.50
3.70
3.90
4.10
4.30
4.50
4.70
4.90

155.35
161.00
166.46
171.74
176.87
181.85
186.71
191.43
196.05
200.55
204.96
209.28

Weir Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

Total
Q
(cfs)
0.00
2.02
4.05
6.07
8.09
12.14
20.23
26.30
32.36
42.48
52.59
66.75
75.85
86.98
98.10
111.25
121.37
135.52
149.68
165.87
175.98
186.09
197.22
202.28
208.34
202.28
155.35
161.00
166.46
171.74
176.87
181.85
186.71
191.43
196.05
200.55
204.96
209.28

14

Manning's Flow
d/D
Q/Qfull

0.07
0.13
0.20
0.27
0.33
0.40
0.47
0.53
0.60
0.67
0.73
0.80
0.87
0.93
1.00

0.02
0.03
0.06
0.125
0.17
0.26
0.36
0.45
0.55
0.66
0.745
0.87
0.95
1.02
1

Q
(cfs)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.95
1.42
2.84
5.91
8.04
12.30
17.02
21.28
26.01
31.21
35.23
41.14
44.92
48.23
47.29

36 in Pipe - Diversion
Orifice Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

1.73
1.93
2.13
2.33
2.53
2.73
2.93

44.77
47.28
49.67
51.95
54.14
56.24
58.26

Weir Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

Total
Q
(cfs)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.95
1.42
2.84
5.91
8.04
12.30
17.02
21.28
26.01
31.21
35.23
41.14
44.92
48.23
47.29
44.77
47.28
49.67
51.95
54.14
56.24
58.26

Grand
Total
Q
(cfs)
0.00
2.02
4.05
6.07
8.09
12.14
20.23
26.30
32.36
42.48
52.59
66.75
75.85
86.98
98.10
111.25
122.31
136.94
152.52
171.78
184.02
198.39
214.24
223.56
234.35
233.49
190.58
202.14
211.38
219.98
224.16
226.62
233.99
241.11
248.00
254.69
261.20
267.54

King Street/Main Street Relief Pipe System


Main Pipe Diversion
Pipe Diam.

(in)
(ft)

Area (ft2)
Manning's n
Bottom of Pipe
Top of Pipe
Slope
Qfull (cfs)
Centerline El.
Rim Elevation
Cd (for orifices)
Weir Length (ft)

60
5
19.63
0.013
113.40
118.40
0.006
202.28
115.90
125.00
0.6
55

36
3
7.07
0.013
116.37
119.37
0.005
47.29
117.87
125.00
0.6
50

Elevation

(ft)
121.0
121.2
121.4
121.6
121.8
122.0
122.2
122.4
122.6
122.8
123.0
123.2
123.4
123.6
123.8
124.0
124.2
124.4
124.6
124.8
125.0
125.2
125.4
125.6
125.8
126.0
126.2
126.4
126.6
126.8
127.0
127.2
127.4
127.6
127.8
128.0

Manning's Flow
d/D
Q/Qfull
Q
(cfs)

60 in Pipe - Main System


Orifice Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)
5.10
213.51
5.30
217.65
5.50
221.72
5.70
225.72
5.90
229.64
6.10
233.50
6.30
237.30
6.50
241.04
6.70
244.72
6.90
248.34
7.10
251.91
7.30
255.44
7.50
258.91
7.70
262.34
7.90
265.73
8.10
269.07
8.30
272.37
8.50
275.63
8.70
278.86
8.90
282.05
9.10
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20

Weir Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40

12.99
36.73
67.48
103.90
145.20
190.87
240.52

Total
Q
(cfs)
213.51
217.65
221.72
225.72
229.64
233.50
237.30
241.04
244.72
248.34
251.91
255.44
258.91
262.34
265.73
269.07
272.37
275.63
278.86
282.05
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
285.20
298.18
321.93
352.68
389.09
430.40
476.07
525.72

15

Manning's Flow
d/D
Q/Qfull

Q
(cfs)

36 in Pipe - Diversion
Orifice Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)
3.13
60.21
3.33
62.11
3.53
63.95
3.73
65.73
3.93
67.47
4.13
69.17
4.33
70.82
4.53
72.44
4.73
74.02
4.93
75.57
5.13
77.09
5.33
78.58
5.53
80.04
5.73
81.47
5.93
82.88
6.13
84.27
6.33
85.63
6.53
86.97
6.73
88.29
6.93
89.60
7.13
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88
90.88

Weir Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
2.20
2.40
2.60
2.80
3.00

11.81
33.39
61.35
94.45
132.00
173.52
218.66
267.15
318.77
373.35
430.73
490.78
553.39
618.46
685.89

Total
Q
(cfs)
60.21
62.11
63.95
65.73
67.47
69.17
70.82
72.44
74.02
75.57
77.09
78.58
80.04
81.47
82.88
84.27
85.63
86.97
88.29
89.60
90.88
102.69
124.27
152.23
185.33
222.88
264.40
309.54
358.03
409.65
464.23
521.61
581.67
644.27
709.34
776.77

Grand
Total
Q
(cfs)
273.72
279.76
285.67
291.45
297.11
302.67
308.12
313.47
318.74
323.91
329.00
334.01
338.95
343.81
348.61
353.34
358.00
362.61
367.15
371.64
376.08
387.88
409.47
437.43
470.53
508.08
549.60
594.74
643.23
707.84
786.16
874.29
970.76
1074.67
1185.41
1302.49

King Street/North Street Relief Pipe System


Pipe Diam.

Main Pipe Diversion


(in)
(ft)

Area (ft2)
Manning's n
Bottom of Pipe
Top of Pipe
Slope
Qfull (cfs)
Centerline El.
Rim Elevation
Cd (for orifices)
Weir Length (ft)

48
4
12.57
0.013
123.66
127.66
0.0049
100.82
125.66
134.82
0.6
45

24
2
3.14
0.013
126.6
128.60
0.0099
22.57
127.60
134.82
0.6
30

Elevation
Manning's Flow
d/D
Q/Qfull
(ft)
123.7
123.9
124.1
124.3
124.5
124.7
124.9
125.1
125.3
125.5
125.7
125.9
126.1
126.3
126.5
126.7
126.9
127.1
127.3
127.5
127.7
127.9
128.1
128.3
128.5
128.7
128.9
129.1
129.3
129.5
129.7
129.9
130.1
130.3

0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00

0.00
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.1
0.145
0.2
0.265
0.33
0.4
0.47
0.55
0.64
0.7
0.79
0.87
0.94
0.99
1.03
1

Q
(cfs)
0.00
1.01
2.02
4.03
6.05
10.08
14.62
20.16
26.72
33.27
40.33
47.38
55.45
64.52
70.57
79.65
87.71
94.77
99.81
103.84
100.82

48 in Pipe - Main System


Orifice Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

2.20
2.40
2.60
2.80
3.00
3.20
3.40
3.60
3.80
4.00
4.20
4.40
4.60

89.75
93.74
97.56
101.25
104.80
108.24
111.57
114.80
117.95
121.01
124.00
126.92
129.77

Weir Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

Total
Q
(cfs)
0.00
1.01
2.02
4.03
6.05
10.08
14.62
20.16
26.72
33.27
40.33
47.38
55.45
64.52
70.57
79.65
87.71
94.77
99.81
103.84
100.82
89.75
93.74
97.56
101.25
104.80
108.24
111.57
114.80
117.95
121.01
124.00
126.92
129.77

16

Manning's Flow
d/D
Q/Qfull

Q
(cfs)

24 in Pipe - Diversion
Orifice Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

Weir Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

Total
Q
(cfs)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Grand
Total
Q
(cfs)
0.00
1.01
2.02
4.03
6.05
10.08
14.62
20.16
26.72
33.27
40.33
47.38
55.45
64.52
70.57
79.65
87.71
94.77
99.81
103.84
100.82
89.75
93.74
97.56
101.25
104.80
108.24
111.57
114.80
117.95
121.01
124.00
126.92
129.77

King Street/North Street Relief Pipe System


Pipe Diam.

Main Pipe Diversion


(in)
(ft)

Area (ft2)
Manning's n
Bottom of Pipe
Top of Pipe
Slope
Qfull (cfs)
Centerline El.
Rim Elevation
Cd (for orifices)
Weir Length (ft)

48
4
12.57
0.013
123.66
127.66
0.0049
100.82
125.66
134.82
0.6
45

24
2
3.14
0.013
126.6
128.60
0.0099
22.57
127.60
134.82
0.6
30

Elevation
Manning's Flow
d/D
Q/Qfull
(ft)
130.5
130.7
130.9
131.1
131.3
131.5
131.7
131.9
132.1
132.3
132.5
132.7
132.9
133.1
133.3
133.5
133.7
133.9
134.1
134.3
134.5
134.7
134.8
135.0
135.2
135.4
135.6
135.8
136.0
136.2
136.4
136.6
136.8
137.0

Q
(cfs)

48 in Pipe - Main System


Orifice Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)
4.80
132.56
5.00
135.30
5.20
137.98
5.40
140.61
5.60
143.19
5.80
145.72
6.00
148.21
6.20
150.66
6.40
153.07
6.60
155.44
6.80
157.78
7.00
160.09
7.20
162.36
7.40
164.60
7.60
166.81
7.80
168.99
8.00
171.14
8.20
173.27
8.40
175.37
8.60
177.44
8.80
179.49
9.00
181.52
9.16
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13

Weir Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8

10.63
30.05
55.21
85.01

Total
Q
(cfs)
132.56
135.30
137.98
140.61
143.19
145.72
148.21
150.66
153.07
155.44
157.78
160.09
162.36
164.60
166.81
168.99
171.14
173.27
175.37
177.44
179.49
181.52
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
183.13
193.75
213.18
238.34
268.13

17

Manning's Flow
d/D
Q/Qfull

Q
(cfs)

24 in Pipe - Diversion
Orifice Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Weir Flow
h
Q
(ft)
(cfs)

0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
2.20

7.08
20.04
36.81
56.67
79.20
104.11
131.19
160.29
191.26
224.01
258.44

Total
Q
(cfs)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.08
20.04
36.81
56.67
79.20
104.11
131.19
160.29
191.26
224.01
258.44

Grand
Total
Q
(cfs)
132.56
135.30
137.98
140.61
143.19
145.72
148.21
150.66
153.07
155.44
157.78
160.09
162.36
164.60
166.81
168.99
171.14
173.27
175.37
177.44
179.49
181.52
183.13
190.21
203.16
219.94
239.80
262.33
287.24
314.32
354.04
404.45
462.35
526.57

Austin Circle/Ryan Road Area Drainage Analysis s

Ryan Road Watershed Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
May 2011
Existing Conditions

Hydrologic Element
RR-A1
Gregory Ln DB
Detention Basin (Inflow)
Detention Basin (Ouflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Peak Storage (acre-ft)
Top of Basin (ft)
RR-A2
Matthew Dr DB
Detention Basin (Inflow)
Detention Basin (Ouflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Peak Storage (acre-ft)
Top of Basin (ft)
Matthew Drive Route
RR-A3-1
RR Elem School
RR-B
J-1
Ryan Road Channel 1
RR-D
J-4
Ryan Road Channel 2
RR-G
J-5
Acrebrook Drive

Location
Gregory Lane

Matthew Lane

Penscal Drive Area


Outlet at Elementary School
Btw School and Brierwood Dr.
Brierwood Drive/Austin Circle Area
Brierwood Drive Culvert
Btw Brierwood and Acrebrook Dr.
Acrebrook Drive Area
Acrebrook Drive Culvert

Drainage Area
(mi2)
(ac)
0.0455
29.1
0.0455
29.1

0.0248
0.0703

15.9
45.0

0.0703
0.0377
0.0377
0.0100
0.1179
0.1179
0.0378
0.1557
0.1557
0.0332
0.1888
0.1888

45.0
24.1
24.1
6.4
75.4
75.4
24.2
99.6
99.6
21.2
120.9
120.9

Tc
34

CN
56

16

50

45

59

15

63

19

60

15

71

2-year

10-year

25-year

100-year

(cfs)
5.3
2.1
5.3
2.1
282.7
0.3
288.0
1.2
2.3
2.6
2.3
280.2
0.2
284.0
2.3
5.6
5.6
3.5
7.0
7.0
8.9
11.6
11.5
21.0
25.1
25.1

(cfs)
10.6
2.9
10.6
2.9
283.6
0.5
288.0
3.3
3.3
5.0
3.3
280.9
0.3
284.0
3.3
10.2
10.2
5.8
13.5
13.4
16.1
20.2
20.1
30.6
40.3
40.3

(cfs)
20.2
3.2
20.2
3.2
285.1
1.3
288.0
8.4
4.1
9.9
4.1
281.7
0.6
284.0
4.1
18.0
18.0
9.5
24.5
24.1
27.9
34.9
34.8
45.1
64.9
64.9

(cfs)
44.1
3.8
44.1
3.8
288.0
3.2
288.0
23.1
5.6
24.6
5.6
283.7
1.3
284.0
10.8
36.6
36.5
17.8
48.1
47.4
55.8
70.5
70.3
76.4
121.5
121.5

Ryan Road Watershed Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
May 2011
Proposed Conditions

Hydrologic Element
RR-A1
Gregory Ln DB
Detention Basin (Inflow)
Detention Basin (Ouflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Peak Storage (acre-ft)
Top of Basin (ft)
RR-A2
Matthew Dr DB
Detention Basin (Inflow)
Detention Basin (Ouflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Peak Storage (acre-ft)
Top of Basin (ft)
Matthew Drive Route
RR-A3-1
RR Elem School
RR-B
J-1
Ryan Road Channel 1
RR-D
J-4
Ryan Road Channel 2
RR-G
J-5
Acrebrook Drive

Location
Gregory Lane

Matthew Lane

Penscal Drive Area


Outlet at Elementary School
Btw School and Brierwood Dr.
Brierwood Drive/Austin Circle Area
Brierwood Drive Culvert
Btw Brierwood and Acrebrook Dr.
Acrebrook Drive Area
Acrebrook Drive Culvert

Drainage Area
(mi2)
(ac)
0.0455
29.1
0.0455
29.1

0.0248
0.0703

15.9
45.0

0.0703
0.0377
0.0377
0.0100
0.1179
0.1179
0.0378
0.1557
0.1557
0.0332
0.1888
0.1888

45.0
24.1
24.1
6.4
75.4
75.4
24.2
99.6
99.6
21.2
120.9
120.9

Tc
34

CN
56

16

54

45

60

15

63

19

60

15

71

2-year

10-year

25-year

100-year

(cfs)
5.3
2.1
5.3
2.1
282.7
0.3
288.0
2.6
2.6
3.1
2.6
280.2
0.2
284.0
2.6
6.3
6.3
3.5
8.3
8.2
8.9
11.9
11.8
21.0
25.1
25.1

(cfs)
10.6
2.8
10.6
2.8
283.6
0.6
288.0
6.0
3.5
6.6
3.5
281.1
0.4
284.0
3.5
11.1
11.1
5.8
15.5
15.3
16.1
20.7
20.6
30.6
40.4
40.4

(cfs)
20.2
3.1
20.2
3.1
285.1
1.3
288.0
12.6
4.4
13.6
4.4
282.1
0.7
284.0
4.4
19.2
19.1
9.5
26.2
25.9
27.9
35.8
35.7
45.1
65.1
65.1

(cfs)
44.1
3.8
44.1
3.8
288.0
3.2
288.0
29.2
6.0
30.8
6.0
284.3
1.5
284.0
11.3
38.1
38.1
17.8
50.2
49.5
55.8
72.4
72.2
76.4
122.1
122.1

Ryan Road Watershed Drainage Analysis


Northampton, MA
Drainage Analysis Summary
May 2011
Proposed Conditions (Detention Basin at Brierwood Drive)

Hydrologic Element
RR-A1
Gregory Ln DB
Detention Basin (Inflow)
Detention Basin (Ouflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Peak Storage (acre-ft)
Top of Basin (ft)
RR-A2
Matthew Dr DB
Detention Basin (Inflow)
Detention Basin (Ouflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Peak Storage (acre-ft)
Top of Basin (ft)
Matthew Drive Route
RR-A3-1
RR Elem School
15" Pipe Outlet
RR-D
RR-B
J-1
Brierwood DB
Detention Basin (Inflow)
Detention Basin (Ouflow)
Maximum Stage (ft)
Peak Storage (acre-ft)
Top of Basin (ft)
Ryan Road Channel 2
RR-G
J-5
Acrebrook Drive

Location
Gregory Lane

Matthew Lane

At Elementary School
Brierwood Drive/Austin Circle Area
Penscal Drive Area
Detention Basin at Brierwood Drive

Btw Brierwood and Acrebrook Dr.


Acrebrook Drive Area
Acrebrook Drive Culvert

Drainage Area
(mi2)
(ac)
0.0455
29.1
0.0455
29.1

0.0248
0.0703

15.9
45.0

0.0703
0.0377
0.0377
0.1079
0.0378
0.0100
0.1557
0.1557

45.0
24.1
24.1
69.1
24.2
6.4
99.6
99.6

0.1557
0.0332
0.1888
0.1888

99.6
21.2
120.9
120.9

Tc
34

CN
56

16

54

45

60

19
15

60
63

15

71

2-year

10-year

25-year

50-year

(cfs)
5.3
2.1
5.3
2.1
282.7
0.3
288.0
2.6
2.6
3.1
2.6
280.2
0.2
284.0
2.6
6.3
6.3
7.2
8.9
3.5
14.9
6.4
14.9
6.4
272.8
1.4
175.0
6.4
21.0
21.1
21.1

(cfs)
10.6
2.8
10.6
2.8
283.6
0.6
288.0
6.0
3.5
6.6
3.5
281.1
0.4
284.0
3.5
11.1
11.1
13.5
16.1
5.8
26.6
11.7
26.6
11.7
272.3
1.9
175.0
11.7
30.6
30.8
30.8

(cfs)
20.2
3.1
20.2
3.1
285.1
1.3
288.0
12.6
4.4
13.6
4.4
282.1
0.7
284.0
4.4
19.2
19.1
22.4
27.9
9.5
46.7
22.4
46.7
22.4
274.0
2.6
175.0
22.3
45.1
46.0
46.0

(cfs)
29.9
3.5
29.9
3.5
286.9
2.4
288.0
19.3
5.2
20.9
5.2
283.0
1.0
284.0
5.2
26.9
26.9
31.0
39.3
12.9
67.0
32.9
67.0
32.9
274.8
3.3
175.0
32.8
58.3
60.7
60.7

Northampton - Time of Concentration


Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
456
383
354
344
320

Flow Path for Area A1


Elevation 2
(ft)
383
354
344
320
283

Length
(ft)
430.0
370.0
350.0
210.0
370.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.170
0.078
0.029
0.114
0.100

Land Use
forest
forest
forest
forest
residential

V
(fps)
1.1
0.7
0.425
0.85
5.5

T
(s)
390.9
528.6
823.5
247.1
67.3

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
398
305

2057
34
34

Flow Path for Area A2


Elevation 2
(ft)
305
285

Length
(ft)
440.0
350.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.211
0.057

Land Use
forest
forest

V
(fps)
1.25
0.6

T
(s)
352.0
583.3

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
398
305
295
290
284.33
279.33
278.33

(Note: Taken from drawings for Sawmill Hills and RR Elementary School.
Elevations were in NGVD and converted to NAVD88)

(Note: Taken from drawings for Sawmill Hills and RR Elementary School.
Elevations were in NGVD and converted to NAVD88)

935
16
16

Flow Path for Area A3-1


Elevation 2
(ft)
305
295
290
284.33
279.33
278.33
277.33

Length
(ft)
500.0
400.0
200.0
250.0
33.0
360.0
215.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.186
0.025
0.025
0.023
0.152
0.003
0.005

Land Use
forest
forest
forest
pavement
short grassed
grassed waterway
pavement

V
(fps)
1.1
0.4
0.4
1.7
2.7
0.8
1.45

T
(s)
454.5
1000.0
500.0
147.1
12.2
450.0
148.3

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Ryan Road for Report.xls

(Note: Taken from drawings for Ryan Road and RR Elementary School.
Elevations were in NGVD and converted to NAVD88)

2712
45
45

5/26/2011

Northampton - Time of Concentration

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
290
275

Flow Path for Area B


Elevation 2
(ft)
275
273.9

Length
(ft)
700.0
292.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.021
0.004

Land Use
residential
grassed waterway

V
(fps)
2.6
0.95

T
(s)
269.2
307.4

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
295
285
272.34

577
10
15

Flow Path for Area D


Elevation 2
(ft)
285
272.34
270.84

Length
(ft)
233.0
583.0
412.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.043
0.022
0.004

Land Use
short grassed
short grassed
grassed waterway

V
(fps)
1.4
1.1
0.95

T
(s)
166.4
530.0
433.7

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
316
305
299.02

(Note: Taken from drawings for Brierwood Drive and RR Elementary School.
Elevations were in NGVD and converted to NAVD88)

1130
19
19

Flow Path for Area G- Path 1


Elevation 2
(ft)
305
299.02
275.96

Length
(ft)
292.0
210.0
675.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.038
0.028
0.034

Land Use
residential
pavement
pavement

V
(fps)
3.45
3.4
3.7

T
(s)
84.6
61.8
182.4

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Ryan Road for Report.xls

(Note: Taken from drawings for Acrebrook Drive.


Elevations were in NGVD and converted to NAVD88)

329
5
15

5/26/2011

Northampton - Time of Concentration


Location:
Elevation 1
(ft)
297.33

Flow Path for Area G - Path 2


Elevation 2
(ft)
275.96

Length
(ft)
990.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.022

Land Use
residential

V
(fps)
2.5

T
(s)
396.0

Total (s)
Total (min)
Use Tc = (min)

Ryan Road for Report.xls

(Note: Taken from drawings for Acrebrook Drive.


Elevations were in NGVD and converted to NAVD88)

396
7
15

5/26/2011

Northampton - Muskingum Routing


Channel 1
Elevation 1
(ft)
273.97

Elevation 2
(ft)
270.94

Length
(ft)
875.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.0035

Land Use

V
(fps)

grassed waterway

0.9

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
972.2
972
16
0.270

Channel 2
Elevation 1
(ft)
270.94

Elevation 2
(ft)
269.34

Length
(ft)
420.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.004

Land Use
grassed waterway

V
(fps)
0.95

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
442.1
442
7
0.123

RR Elem School
Elevation 1
(ft)
277.33

Elevation 2
(ft)
273.9

Length
(ft)
230.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.015

Land Use

V
(fps)

grassed waterway

1.9

Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

T
(s)
121.1
121
2
0.034

Matthew Drive Route


Elevation 1
(ft)
285.33
284.33
279.33
278.33
277.33

Elevation 2
(ft)
284.33
279.33
278.33
277.33
273.9

Length
(ft)
35.0
33.0
360.0
215.0
230.0

Slope
(ft/ft)
0.029
0.152
0.003
0.005
0.015

Land Use
pavement
short grassed
grassed waterway
pavement
grassed waterway
Total (s)
Total (min)
Total (hr)

Ryan Road for Report.xls

V
(fps)
3.4
2.7
0.8
1.45
1.9

T
(s)
10.3
12.2
450.0
148.3
121.1
742
12
0.206
5/26/2011

Appendix C
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Bridge Street/Meadows Area

Table
Bridge Street/Meadows Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Bridge Street/Meadows Area, Industrial Drive


Location Description
Sub_Bas
Order
in

12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
12+13
12+13
12+13
12+13
12+13

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
20
21
22
23
24

Upstream (US)
ID

MH-1341
MH-1340
MH-327
MH-1342
MH-328
MH-1343
MH-329
MH-1344
MH-326
MH-325
MH-318
MH-317
MH-1942
MH-1954
MH-1831
MH-975
MH-1828
MH-1827
MH-1826
MH-1954
MH-1954
MH-1679
MH-1678
MH-1677
MH-1676

Downstream
(DS) ID

MH-327
MH-327
MH-1342
MH-1343
MH-1343
MH-329
MH-1344
MH-326
MH-325
MH-318
MH-317
MH-1942
MH-1954
-MH-975
MH-1828
MH-1827
MH-1826
MH-1954
--

MH-1679
MH-1678
MH-1677
MH-1676
Open Water

Location

Lincoln Ave
Day Ave
Day Ave
Day Ave
Day Ave
Sherman Ave
Sherman Ave
Sherman Ave
Coolidge Ave
Marshall Street
Marshall Street
Marshall Street
Marshall Street
Marshall Street
Industrial Drive
Industrial Drive
Industrial Drive
Industrial Drive
Industrial Drive
Industrial Drive
Marshall Street
Marshall Street
Water Street
Water Street
Water Street

Drain Line

Main
Day Ave
Main
Main
Day Ave
Sherman Ave
Sherman Ave
Sherman Ave
Coolidge Ave
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff


Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

2-YR
Storm
(cfs)

10-YR
Storm
(cfs)

25-YR
Storm
(cfs)

100-YR
Storm
(cfs)

137.00
137.00
137.00
137.00
137.00
137.00
139.63
143.13
139.68
135.00
135.20
136.90
135.00
134.40
137.89
142.70
145.10
145.30
145.50
134.40
134.40
137.41
137.00
134.89
127.00

---------123.60
121.19
120.75
120.19
--127.51
125.25
122.74
121.90
119.70
119.70
118.06
116.85
112.62
--

383.00
183.00
279.00
196.00
167.00
125.00
183.00
125.00
221.00
106.00
96.00
128.00
67.00
-533.00
525.00
292.00
332.00
385.00
-296.00
220.83
71.00
37.50
--

-------------34.8
-----82.9
----117.7

-------------32.9
-----92.6
----125.5

-------------57.5
-----155.3
----212.8

-------------77.3
-----206.4
----283.7

-------------117.7
-----309.5
----427.2

Existing Pipes
Pipe Size
Manning
Pipe Mat'l
(in)
"n" value

12
10
12
12
8
15
15
15
15
18
24
24
24
24
36
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
42
42
42

AK/FH
AK/FH
AK/FH
AK/FH
AK/FH
VC
VC
VC
VC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC

0.015
0.014
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

Pipes Needed

Comments

Slope (ft/ft)

Existing** Peak
Rate of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future** Peak
Rate of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

0.01000
0.01000
0.01000
0.01000
0.01000
-0.02053
-0.01913
0.01746
0.01213
0.02274
0.00458
0.00438
0.00400
0.00400
0.00500
0.00430
0.00860
0.00253
0.00571
0.00571
0.00554
0.00548
0.05958
0.04320
0.04320

-------------57.5
-----155.3
----212.8

3.1
2.04
3.1
3.1
1.05
8.0
7.8
7.4
6.2
12.2
13.3
13.0
12.5
12.5
41.1
82.3
89.1
63.1
94.8
94.8
93.3
92.8
67.9
67.9
67.9

3.9
3.74
3.9
3.9
3.00
6.6
6.3
6.0
5.0
6.9
4.2
4.1
4.0
4.0
5.8
6.5
7.1
5.0
7.5
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.1
7.1
7.1

-------------59.5
-----160.4
----219.6

-------------63.6
-----176.9
----221.5

-12
18
24
12
24
30
30
36
36
42
42
42
42
-----60
66
66
66
66
66

-------------6.6
-----8.2
----9.2

Manage stormwater on-site with BMPs

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

11/18/2011

Table
Bridge Street/Meadows Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Bridge Street/Meadows Area, Williams Street Parallel


Location Description
Sub_Ba
Upstream (US)
Order
sin
ID

2
2
2
2
2
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
11
11

1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
35
36
37

MH-308
MH-309
MH-1729
Junct. A
MH-1647
IN-3330
IN-3332
IN-3333
Junct. B
IN-3334
MH-1649
Junct. C
MH-1650
MH-1651
IN-3347
IN-3346
IN-3353
MH-1658
IN-3352
MH-1619
MH-1621
MH-1814
Wetland
MH-1622
MH-994
Junct. E
MH-995
MH-1669
MH-1668
MH-1667
MH-1666
MH-1660
MH-1665
Sub-Basin 8
Junct. F
MH-957
OUT-57

Downstream
(DS) ID

MH-309
MH-1729
MH-1647
-IN-3330
IN-3332
IN-3333
IN-3334
-MH-1649
MH-1650
-MH-1651
IN-3347
IN-3346
IN-3353
MH-1658
IN-3352
MH-1619
MH-1621
MH-1814
MH-1622
-MH-994
MH-995
-MH-1669
MH-1668
MH-1667
MH-1666
MH-1660
MH-1665
MH-957
--OUT-57
--

Location

Lincoln Ave
Lincoln Ave
Bridge Street
MH-1647
Old Ferry Road
Fairgrounds
Fairgrounds
Fairgrounds
IN-3332
Fairgrounds
Fairgrounds
MH-1650
Bridge Street Parallel
Pomeroy Terrace Parallel
Pomeroy Terrace Parallel
Bridge Street Parallel
Pomeroy Terrace Parallel
Pomeroy Terrace Parallel
Pomeroy Terrace Parallel
Pomeroy Terrace Parallel
Pomeroy Terrace Parallel
Pomeroy Terrace Parallel
MH-1622
Williams Street Parallel
Williams Street Parallel
MH-995
Williams Street Parallel
Williams Street Parallel
Williams Street Parallel
Williams Street Parallel
Williams Street Parallel
Williams Street Parallel
Williams Street Parallel
MH-957
MH-957
Williams Street Parallel
Junct. G

Drain Line

Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff


Rim
Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

147.00
137.00
137.00
122.22
122.22
119.12
118.24
118.00
118.24
117.92
119.90
119.90
121.72
118.53
116.38
116.78
116.57
117.44
115.01
114.47
114.87
112.50
112.50
111.84
115.05
115.05
114.24
112.69
111.97
110.85
112.63
114.73
114.32
112.18
112.18
112.18
108.00

---116.42
116.42
115.52
114.84
114.85
114.84
114.92
114.70
114.70
113.82
113.23
113.78
112.68
111.42
110.84
109.71
109.37
108.67
109.30
109.30
108.14
107.10
107.10
106.24
106.12
106.12
105.45
105.63
-104.52
101.78
101.78
101.78
101.64

320.00
629.17
401.50
--

425.41
91.47
115.15
119.85
-37.06
373.67
--

217.83
239.77
86.68
210.21
132.46
378.96
364.49
278.30
197.11
279.22
--

249.39
30.16
--

350.79
242.44
230.14
247.72
221.91
279.17
144.98
--173.43
--

Drainage
Area
(acres)

2-YR
Storm
(cfs)

10-YR
Storm
(cfs)

25-YR
Storm
(cfs)

100-YR
Storm
(cfs)

---44.6
----49.8
--60.1
---

---41.9
----50.9
--54.8
---

---75.7
----96.0
--102.2
---

---103.6
----132.9
--141.3
---

---161.3
----209.1
--221.6
---

-------180.6
--190.6
-------210.0
230.8
-233.1

-------9.6
--12.8
-------19.3
38.2
-39.1

-------32.1
--32.8
-------40.8
72.0
-73.6

-------107.7
--105.5
-------98.7
104.4
-104.6

-------277.5
--273.2
-------232.3
243.1
-243.7

Existing Pipes
Pipe
Size (in)

Pipe
Mat'l

12
15
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24

Tile
AK/FH
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
RC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC

Manning
Slope (ft/ft)
"n" value

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

0.03125
0.03403
0.03681
0.03681
0.00212
0.00634
-0.00009
-0.00058
-0.00058
0.00594
0.00236
0.00236
0.00271
-0.00229
0.01154
0.00599
0.00438
0.00298
0.00093
0.00252
-0.00320
0.00398
0.00398
0.00397
0.02851
0.02851
0.00034
-0.09335
0.00291
-0.00113
0.00410
0.00294
0.01062
0.00294
0.01062
0.00081
0.00081

Existing**
Peak Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

---75.7
----96.0
--102.2
---------32.1
--32.8
-------40.8
72.0
-73.6

Pipes Needed

Comments

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future** Peak
Rate of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

5.5
10.4
12.2
12.2
4.2
7.3
0.9
2.2
2.2
7.0
4.4
4.4
10.3
9.4
21.2
15.3
13.0
10.8
6.0
9.9
11.1
12.4
12.4
12.4
21.8
21.8
3.6
21.8
10.6
6.6
12.6
10.7
20.3
10.7
20.3
5.6
5.6

7.0
8.4
6.9
6.9
2.4
4.1
0.5
1.3
1.3
4.0
2.5
2.5
3.3
3.0
6.7
4.9
4.2
3.4
1.9
3.1
3.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
6.9
6.9
1.2
6.9
3.4
2.1
4.0
3.4
6.5
3.4
6.5
1.8
1.8

---80.2
----80.3
--87.7
----------41.3
--41.7
-------36.7
68.6
-70.4

---104.8
----81.2
--95.4
----------42.1
--53.8
-------53.8
76.8
-76.8

--48
48
----66
--54
----------36
--36
----30
30
30
36
42
42
42

---6.4
----3.4
--6.0
----------5.9
--5.9
-------5.2
7.1
-7.3

Divert down Old Ferry Road

Divert down Old Ferry Road

Divert down Old Ferry Road

Divert runoff through airport

Divert runoff through airport

Design flows are similar under recommended plan


Design flows are similar under recommended plan

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

11/18/2011

Elm Street Brook/Florence Area

Table
Elm Street Brook Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Elm Street Brook Area, South Main Street


Location Description
Sub_Bas
Order Upstream (US) ID
in

U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U

6
7
8
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
21
22
25
26

MH-401
MH-403
MH-404
MH-405
MH-406
MH-1555
MH-412
MH-414
MH-415
MH-423
MH-422
MH-421
MH-2234
MH-1477
OUT-150

Downstream
(DS) (ID)

MH-403
MH-404
MH-405
MH-406
MH-1555
MH-423
MH-414
MH-415
MH-1555
MH-422
MH-421
MH-2234
MH-1477
OUT-150
--

Location

Drain Line

S Main Street
S Main Street
S Main Street
S Main Street
S Main Street
S Main Street
Beacon Street
Beacon Street
Beacon Street
S Main Street
S Main Street
S Main Street
S Main Street
S Main Street
S Main Street

Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Beacon Street
Beacon Street
Beacon Street
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff

Existing Pipes

Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

2-YR
Storm
(cfs)

10-YR
Storm
(cfs)

25-YR
Storm
(cfs)

100-YR
Storm
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe Mat'l

Manning
"n" value

269.25
268.64
267.73
266.53
263.55
255.98
275.00
275.00
266.50
256.09
238.01
217.02
200.38
193.60
169.13

----------------

210.49
255.00
265.00
161.00
337.00
35.00
535.00
270.00
278.00
514.00
480.00
405.00
110.46
233.78
--

--------------68.4

--------------25.1

--------------62.5

--------------96.2

--------------170.3

10
10
10
10
10
15
10
10
10
10
15
15
15
18
24

VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

Existing** Peak
Slope (ft/ft) Rate of Runoff
(cfs)

0.0012
0.0058
0.0058
0.0185
0.0225
0.0390
0.0100
0.0144
0.0379
0.0352
0.0509
0.0362
0.0578
0.1052
0.1052

--------------62.5

Pipes Needed
Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

0.7
1.4
1.4
2.6
2.9
11.1
1.90
2.28
3.70
3.6
8.5
10.7
8.5
12.2
21.8

1.2
2.6
2.6
4.7
5.2
9.0
3.49
4.18
6.79
6.5
6.9
8.7
6.9
6.9
6.9

Future** Peak
Pipe Capacity Pipe Size
Rate of Runoff
(cfs)
(in)
(cfs)

--------------66.10

--------------76.8

12
12
12
12
12
-12
12
12
12
----42

Comments
Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

--------------6.9

Direct Runoff overland to brook

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

7/21/2011

Table
Elm Street Brook Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Elm Street Brook Area, North Elm


Location Description

Sub_
Basin

Order Upstream (US) ID

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y+X

1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

MH-1589
MH-1590
MH-1586
MH-1587
MH-1585
MH-1584
MH-1583
MH-1362
MH-1361
MH-1361
MH-1360
MH-1380
MH-1812
MH-992
OUT-149

Downstream
(DS) ID

MH-1590
MH-1586
MH-1587
MH-1585
MH-1584
MH-1583
MH-1362
MH-1361
-MH-1360
MH-1380
MH-1812
MH-992
OUT-149
--

Location

North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm
North Elm

Drain Line

Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff

Existing Pipes

Pipes Needed

Comments

Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

2-YR
Storm
(cfs)

10-YR
Storm
(cfs)

25-YR
Storm
(cfs)

100-YR
Storm
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe Mat'l

Manning
"n" value

Slope (ft/ft)

Existing** Peak
Rate of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future** Peak
Rate of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

231.50
229.23
226.00
226.00
217.91
216.81
217.72
200.61
199.60
199.60
196.00
196.00
173.46
167.00
167.00

----------------

75.00
235.00
54.00
278.00
70.00
32.00
1209.00
38.88
155.83
155.83
59.77
289.00
118.00
43.00
--

--------17.0
-----25.5

--------11.8
-----18.3

--------24.7
-----37.0

--------35.8
-----53.0

--------59.5
-----87.2

12
12
12
12
12
12
10
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
18

RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
Conc
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
Cast Iron

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

0.0182
0.0137
0.0197
0.0291
0.0157
-0.0284
0.0142
0.0158
0.0231
0.0231
0.0010
0.0780
0.0362
0.0010
0.0100

--------24.7
-----13.0

4.2
3.6
4.3
5.3
3.9
5.2
2.3
7.1
8.5
8.5
1.8
8.5
10.7
1.8
9.1

5.3
4.6
5.5
6.7
4.9
6.6
4.2
5.7
7.0
7.0
1.4
6.9
8.7
1.4
5.2

--------24.7
-----37.0

--------21.4
-----22.6

------12
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24

--------7.9
-----7.2

Partly overland flow to brook

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

7/21/2011

Table
Elm Street Brook Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Elm Street Brook Area, Riverside Drive


Location Description

Sub_
Basin

Order Upstream (US) ID

Z
Z
Z
Z

1
2
3
4

MH-468
MH-456
MH-458
MH-986

Downstream
(DS) ID

MH-456
MH-986
MH-456
--

Location

Milton Street
Milton Street
Riverside Drive
Riverside Drive

Drain Line

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff

Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

167.00
167.00
167.00
167.00

-----

268.28
80.00
171.00
--

---5.8

Main
Main
Side Street
Main

Existing Pipes

2-YR
Storm
(cfs)

10-YR
Storm
(cfs)

25-YR
Storm
(cfs)

100-YR
Storm
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe Mat'l

Manning
"n" value

---4.0

---8.2

---11.7

---19.1

12
12
12
12

Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

Pipes Needed

Existing**
Slope (ft/ft) Peak Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

0.0100
0.0100
0.0100
0.0100

---8.2

Comments

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future**
Peak Rate
of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1

3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9

---8.2

---10.5

48
48
18
18

---5.9

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

7/21/2011

Table
Elm Street Brook Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Elm Street Brook Area, Locust Street


Location Description
Sub_Bas
Order
in

N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

24

Upstream (US) ID

Downstream
(ID)

MH-172
MH-410
MH-2411
MH-1510
MH-1568
MH-1569
MH-1556
MH-408
MH-1570
MH-1571
MH-1574
MH-1397
MH-1398
OUT-127
OUT-128
MH-1581
MH-1582
MH-1580
MH-1579
MH-1578
MH-1577
MH-1575
MH-1319
MH-1474
MH-1320
MH-1398
MH-876
MH-1318
MH-2186
MH-1475
IN-3045

MH-2411
MH-2411
MH-1510
MH-1568
MH-1569
MH-1556
MH-408
MH-1570
MH-1571
MH-1574
MH-1397
MH-1398
OUT-128
--MH-1582
MH-1580
MH-1579
MH-1578
MH-1577
MH-1575
MH-1319
MH-1474
MH-1320
MH-1398
-MH-1318
MH-2186
MH-1475
IN-3045
--

Location

Main Street
Main Street
Chestnut Street
Main Street
Main Street
Main Street
Main Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street Parallell - II
Locust Street Parallell - II
Locust Street Parallell - II
Locust Street

Drain Line

Side Street
Side Street
Side Street
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Locust Street
Main

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff


Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

275.00
275.00
275.00
271.28
271.53
261.44
291.27
254.63
249.71
240.73
224.68
211.16
206.71
196.89
196.99
236.00
236.00
236.00
236.00
236.00
236.00
235.13
229.18
220.11
211.57
206.00
230.42
227.00
225.10
221.00
206.00

----263.72
255.13
-249.36
241.04
235.03
218.63
205.31
195.71
188.31
188.41
-------223.31
214.06
205.60
-225.69
221.81
220.15
216.17
--

268.25
20.00
329.95
299.66
582.00
166.00
21.46
124.00
180.00
315.00
320.00
330.00
38.00
--141.61
105.00
91.21
209.24
118.03
195.00
198.51
249.00
290.00
323.00
-154.00
63.00
98.00
600.00
--

--------------23.0
----------26.4
----8.8

Existing Pipes

2-YR Storm
10-YR
25-YR
100-YR
Pipe Size
(cfs)
Storm (cfs) Storm (cfs) Storm (cfs)
(in)

--------------16.0
----------22.5
----7.5

--------------32.3
----------43.9
----14.6

--------------46.3
----------61.9
----20.6

--------------75.7
----------99.7
----33.2

8
8
8
10
18
18
12
12
12
15
15
18
42
8
36
12
10
10
10
10
15
15
18
18
24
24
8
8
8
8
24

Pipes Needed

Comments

Pipe Mat'l

Manning
"n" value

Slope (ft/ft)

Existing**
Peak Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future** Peak
Rate of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

VC
VC
VC
RC
RCP
RC
RC
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
CI
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
VC
VC
VC
VC
RCP

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

0.0121
0.0121
0.0121
0.0068
0.0148
0.0308
0.0308
0.0671
0.0455
0.0521
0.0416
0.0291
0.1921
-0.1921
0.0812
0.0812
0.0812
0.0812
0.0812
0.0182
0.0300
0.0371
0.0292
0.0306
0.0306
0.0252
0.0263
0.0406
0.1843
0.0306

--------------32.3
----------43.9
----14.6

1.2
1.2
1.2
1.6
11.1
12.2
5.4
5.4
5.4
8.5
8.5
12.2
67.9
-49.6
5.4
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
7.6
9.7
12.2
12.2
21.8
21.8
1.7
1.7
2.1
2.4
21.8

3.3
3.3
3.3
2.9
6.3
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
7.1
-7.0
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.2
7.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
4.8
4.9
6.1
6.9
6.9

--------------38.2
----------43.9
----14.6

--------------53.8
----------53.8
----21.4

12
12
12
12
----------36
-12
12
12
12
-----36
12
12
12
12
24

--------------5.4
----------6.2
----4.7

Manage stormwater runoff with BMPs

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

7/21/2011

Table
Elm Street Brook Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Elm Street Brook Area, Bikeway


Location Description

Sub_B
asin

Order Upstream (US) ID

M
M
M
M
M
M
M
O
O
O
O

1
2
4
5
6
7
9
11
12
13
14

MH-652
MH-653
MH-2037
MH-2036
MH-925
MH-2038
MH-2040
MH-2040
MH-2039
MH-924
OUT-124

Downstream
(DS) ID

MH-653
MH-2036
MH-925
MH-2037
MH-2038
MH-2040
-MH-2039
MH-924
OUT-124
--

Location

Bikeway
Bikeway
Bikeway
Bikeway
Bikeway
Bikeway
Branch #2/ North
Branch #1/ East
Branch #1/ East
Branch #1/ East
Branch #1/ East

Drain Line

Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff

Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

275.00
275.00
275.00
275.00
265.60
265.00
251.41
251.41
250.39
234.39
223.52

------------

128.76
42.92
226.75
213.16
684.78
761.83
-42.92
276.92
21.46
--

------23.0
---26.0

Existing Pipes

2-YR
Storm
(cfs)

10-YR
Storm
(cfs)

25-YR
Storm
(cfs)

100-YR
Storm
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe Mat'l

Manning
"n" value

------6.2
---7.8

------17.5
---21.2

------28.1
---33.8

------51.9
---62.0

10
10
18
15
18
24
24
30
30
30
30

Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc
RCP
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

Existing**
Slope (ft/ft) Peak Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

0.0414
0.0414
0.0414
0.0140
0.0140
0.0178
0.0178
0.0238
0.0953
0.5066
0.5066

------17.5
---53.7

Pipes Needed

Comments

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future**
Peak Rate
of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

3.9
3.9
12.2
6.7
10.8
26.3
26.3
34.3
34.3
34.3
34.3

7.1
7.1
6.9
5.4
6.1
8.4
8.4
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0

------19.8
---23.5

------21.4
---35.5

------24
---30

------6.3
---4.8

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

7/21/2011

Table
Elm Street Brook Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Elm Street Brook Area, Strawberry Avenue


Location Description

Sub_
Basin

F
F
F
F
F
F
F

Order Upstream (US) ID

15
16
18
19
20
21
22

MH-719
MH-713
MH-715
MH-716
MH-1426
MH-1333
OUT-183

Downstream
(DS) ID

MH-713
MH-715
MH-716
MH-1426
MH-1333
OUT-183
--

Location

Branch #2/ North


Branch #2/ North
Branch #2/ North
Branch #2/ North
Branch #2/ North
Branch #2/ North
Branch #2/ North

Drain Line

Side Street
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff

Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

254.94
250.46
248.38
245.40
243.64
223.23
216.00

--------

219.97
397.01
241.43
255.00
150.22
32.19
--

------31.0

Existing Pipes

2-YR
Storm
(cfs)

10-YR
Storm
(cfs)

25-YR
Storm
(cfs)

100-YR
Storm
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe Mat'l

Manning
"n" value

------25.5

------47.2

------65.1

------102.5

12
12
12
12
12
12
12

Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

Existing**
Slope (ft/ft) Peak Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

0.0204
0.0052
0.0123
0.0051
0.1359
0.2246
0.2246

------47.2

Pipes Needed

Comments

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future**
Peak Rate
of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

4.4
2.2
3.4
2.2
5.4
5.4
5.4

5.6
2.8
4.4
2.8
6.9
6.9
6.9

------49.0

------53.8

18
24
24
36
36
36
36

------6.9

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

7/21/2011

Table
Elm Street Brook Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Elm Street Brook Area, Strawberry Hill


Location Description

Sub_Bas
Order
in

B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Upstream (US) ID

MH-680
MH-691
MH-690
MH-689
MH-710
MH-711
MH-2251
MH-1424
OUT-195

Downstream
(DS) ID

MH-691
MH-690
MH-689
MH-710
MH-2251
MH-2251
MH-1424
OUT-195
--

Location

Strawberry Hill Road


Strawberry Hill Road
Strawberry Hill Road
Chestnut Street
Chestnut Street
Chestnut Street
Near Chestnut Street
Near Chestnut Street
Near Chestnut Street

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff

Drain Line

Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Side Street
Main
Main
Main

319.83
310.50
300.88
278.88
274.00
275.00
278.63
273.21
265.45

310.40
303.10
293.10
267.33
266.23
-----

186.00
112.00
236.50
80.00
15.00
214.00
123.00
407.00
--

--------27.7

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

Existing Pipes

2-YR
Storm
(cfs)

10-YR
Storm
(cfs)

25-YR
Storm
(cfs)

100-YR
Storm
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe Mat'l

Manning
"n" value

--------11.8

--------29.0

--------45.3

--------81.4

12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
15

RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

Existing**
Slope (ft/ft) Peak Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

0.0387
0.0884
0.1085
0.0125
0.0153
-0.0169
0.1072
0.0191
0.0191

--------29.0

Pipes Needed

Comments

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future**
Peak Rate
of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

6.1
5.4
5.4
3.5
3.8
4.0
5.4
4.3
7.8

7.8
6.9
6.9
4.4
4.9
5.1
6.9
5.4
6.3

--------29.9

--------31.2

18
18
18
18
18
24
24
24
24

--------9.9

Table
Elm Street Brook Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Elm Street Brook Area, Bridge Street


Location Description
Sub_B
Order
asin

A
A
A
A
A
A
A

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

DownUpstream (US) ID stream (DS)


ID

MH-684
MH-685
MH-686
MH-687
MH-1369
MH-688
MH-1559

MH-685
MH-686
MH-687
MH-688
MH-688
MH-1559
--

Location

Fox Farms Road


Bridge Road
Bridge Road
Bridge Road
Chestnut Street
Bridge Road
Bridge Road

Drain Line

Side Street
Side Street
Main
Main
Side Street
Main
Main

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff

Existing Pipes

Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

2-YR
Storm
(cfs)

10-YR
Storm
(cfs)

25-YR
Storm
(cfs)

100-YR
Storm
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe Mat'l

Manning
"n" value

292.27
279.41
274.84
265.00
270.27
262.69
261.51

279.60
266.70
------

322.00
68.00
447.11
191.00
396.00
304.20
--

------27.1

------17.5

------37.5

------55.0

------92.5

12
12
12
12
12
12
15

RCP
RCP
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

Existing**
Slope (ft/ft) Peak Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

0.0401
0.0672
0.0220
0.0121
0.0191
0.0039
0.0039

------37.5

Pipes Needed

Comments

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future**
Peak Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

6.2
5.4
4.6
3.4
4.3
1.9
3.5

7.9
6.9
5.8
4.3
5.5
2.5
2.9

------39.4

------35.5

18
18
18
18
18
30
30

------8.0

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

7/21/2011

Table
Elm Street Brook Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

Elm Street Brook Area, Federal Street


Location Description
Sub_B
Order
asin

CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
BB
BB
BB
BB
BB

1
2
7
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
27
28
29
30
31

Upstream (US) ID

MH-2233
MH-342
MH-341
MH-435
MH-436
MH-461
MH-1351
MH-2078
MH-467
MH-466
MH-465
MH-464
MH-2079
MH-803
MH-1352
OUT-146
MH-385
MH-386
MH-387
MH-381
OUT-81

Downstream
(DS) ID

MH-342
MH-341
MH-435
MH-436
MH-461
MH-1351
MH-2078
MH-2079
MH-466
MH-465
MH-464
MH-2079
MH-803
MH-1352
OUT-146
-MH-386
MH-387
MH-381
OUT-81
--

Location

Drain Line

Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Milton Street
Milton Street
Milton Street
Milton Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street
Federal Street

Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Milton Street
Milton Street
Milton Street
Milton Street
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff


Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

2-YR
Storm
(cfs)

10-YR
Storm
(cfs)

25-YR
Storm
(cfs)

100-YR
Storm
(cfs)

187.00
174.71
169.31
170.60
173.76
-166.29
165.34
160.94
159.25
159.28
158.96
160.61
150.50
152.58
151.78
202.52
199.26
175.50
155.13
152.74

175.72
173.96
169.18
162.12
156.55
155.37
157.60
151.80
---152.11
150.85
151.50
144.43
142.70
------

240.00
55.00
270.00
80.00
252.00
307.00
240.00
270.00
390.00
52.03
379.85
48.15
105.00
420.00
180.00
-48.00
294.00
330.00
75.00
--

---------------76.5
----19.8

---------------53.0
----28.8

---------------111.2
----47.3

---------------206.6
----61.9

---------------268.3
----91.1

Existing Pipes
Manning
Pipe Size
Pipe Mat'l
"n" value
(in)

15
15
15
20
18
18
18
18
8
12
12
12
18
18
18
18
10
10
10
10
10

RC
RC
RC
VC
VC
VC
VC
VC
Conc
PCCP
PCCP
PCCP
VC
VC
VC
PCCP
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

Existing** Peak
Slope (ft/ft) Rate of Runoff
(cfs)

0.0321
0.0321
0.0221
0.0696
0.0047
0.0101
0.0125
0.0170
0.0325
0.0044
0.0008
-0.0343
0.0030
0.0065
0.0047
0.0047
0.9873
0.1582
0.0617
0.0118
0.0118

---------------111.20
----47.30

Pipes Needed

Comments

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future** Peak
Rate of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

10.06
10.06
8.35
15.11
6.25
9.19
10.22
11.92
1.89
2.05
0.90
5.73
5.01
7.37
6.27
6.27
3.75
3.75
4.73
2.06
2.06

8.20
8.20
6.81
6.93
3.54
5.20
5.78
6.74
5.41
2.60
1.14
7.30
2.83
4.17
3.55
3.54
6.87
6.87
8.67
3.79
3.79

---------------116.50
----48.70

---------------7.2
----53.8

--24
24
36
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
---18
36
36
36
36
36

---------------4.1
----6.9

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

7/21/2011

King Street/Market Street Area

Table
King Street/Market Street Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

King Street/Market Street Area, State Street


Location Description
Sub_B
Order
asin

M
M
M
M
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
J
J
J
J
J
J
J

1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
12
14
15
16
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Upstream (US)
ID

MH-2029
MH-1293
MH-1292
MH-1291
MH-1041
MH-1040
MH-1039
MH-1038
MH-1037
MH-1035
MH-1034
MH-1033
MH-1030
MH-1029
MH-1028
MH-1026
MH-1291
MH-1291
MH-1742
MH-1741
MH-1739
MH-1744
MH-1160
MH-1159

Downstream
(DS) ID

MH-1293
MH-1292
MH-1291
-MH-1040
MH-1039
MH-1038
MH-1037
MH-1035
MH-1034
MH-1033
MH-1030
MH-1029
MH-1028
MH-1026
MH-1291
-MH-1742
MH-1741
MH-1739
MH-1744
MH-1160
MH-1159
--

Location

State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
State Street
Trumbull Road
Trumbull Road
Trumbull Road
Trumbull Road
Trumbull Road
Trumbull Road
Trumbull Road

Drain Line

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff


Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

147.10
153.64
147.08
148.37
155.98
149.16
148.06
147.14
147.46
147.46
147.33
147.12
146.77
146.49
146.45
145.93
148.60
148.60
137.88
138.09
135.27
131.76
134.39
134.79

141.50
140.69
139.88
140.09
149.64
143.84
142.46
141.67
141.04
141.01
140.98
140.80
140.66
140.69
140.79
140.53
140.09
140.09
132.88
132.29
130.86
126.62
122.30
120.35

166.59
316.70
275.00
-252.00
106.00
138.21
173.00
40.00
23.00
125.00
50.00
67.00
50.00
183.33
230.00
-251.00
4.00
122.00
196.00
124.00
19.00
--

---4.5
------------20.7
------52.5

Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main

Existing Pipes

Manning
2-YR Storm
10-YR
25-YR
100-YR
Pipe Size
Pipe Mat'l
"n" value
(cfs)
Storm (cfs) Storm (cfs) Storm (cfs)
(in)

---8.4
------------44.6
------105.7

---10.4
------------56.3
------135.0

---14.4
------------72.6
------176.2

---21.5
------------105.2
------258.9

8
8
8
8
12
12
16
18
18
18
18
18
21
21
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
36
36
36

DI
DI
DI
DI
Clay
RC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
RC
RC
RC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
RC
AC

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

Pipes Needed

Comments

Slope (ft/ft)

Existing**
Peak Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future**
Peak Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

0.0049
0.0026
-0.0037
-0.0037
0.0230
0.0097
0.0057
0.0037
0.0012
0.0018
0.0014
0.0034
-0.0007
-0.0033
0.0014
-0.0013
-0.0013
0.0287
0.1475
0.0117
0.0216
0.0348
0.1026
0.1026

---10.4
------------56.3
------135.0

0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
4.7
3.0
5.0
5.6
3.2
3.9
3.5
5.3
3.6
8.0
7.4
7.1
7.1
21.8
21.8
21.3
29.0
49.6
49.6
49.6

2.1
1.5
1.8
1.8
6.0
3.9
3.6
3.2
1.8
2.2
2.0
3.0
1.5
3.3
2.4
2.2
2.2
6.9
6.9
6.8
9.2
7.0
7.0
7.0

---11.6
------------56.3
------139.8

---21.4
------------53.8
------138.1

12
18
18
24
----------36
36
36
48
48
54
54
54
54
54

---3.7
------------8.0
------8.8

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

11/18/2011

Table
King Street/Market Street Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

King Street/Market Street Area, King Street


Location Description
Sub_B
asin

E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
F
F
F
F
F
E-F
G
G
G
G
G
I
I
I
I
J
J
J
J
J
Q
Q
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T

Order

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
44
45
46
47
48

GAGENJL

Upstream (US) ID

Downstream (DS)
ID

MH-1488
MH-1275
MH-1274
MH-1273
MH-1270
MH-1269
MH-1268
MH-1267
Junction E
MH-1298
MH-595
MH-596
MH-596a
Church Street
Junction E-F
MH-1261
MH-1263
MH-1262
MH-1260
Junction G
MH-1259
MH-1256
MH-1255
Junction I
MH-1252
MH-1251
MH-1248
MH-1247
Junction J
MH-1158
MH-1162
MH-1162
MH-1163
MH-1165
MH-1154
MH-2492
MH-2491
MH-2486
MH-2488
MH-2490
MH-2490
MH-1412
MH-2490
MH-1411
MH-1415
MH-1418
MH-1419
MH-1420
MH-1423
MH-1422
MH-1421
MH-973
OUT-62

MH-1275
MH-1274
MH-1273
MH-1270
MH-1269
MH-1268
MH-1267
MH-1261
-MH-595
MH-596
MH-596a
MH-1261
--MH-1263
MH-1262
MH-1260
MH-1259
-MH-1256
MH-1255
MH-1252
-MH-1251
MH-1248
MH-1247
MH-1158
-MH-1162
-MH-1163
MH-1165
MH-1154
MH-2492
MH-2491
MH-2486
MH-2488
MH-2490
-MH-1412
-MH-1411
MH-1415
MH-1418
MH-1419
MH-1420
MH-1423
MH-1422
MH-1421
MH-973
OUT-62
--

Location

King Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
Church Street
Church Street
Church Street
Church Street
Church Street
Church Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King @ Finn Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King @ North Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King @ Trumbull Road
King Street
Allen Place
King Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
King Street
Off King Street
Off King Street
King Street
Bridge Street Diversion
Bridge Street Diversion
Main Street/Rte 9
Strong Street
Strong Street
Strong Street
Pearl Street
Pleasant Street/Rte 5
Pleasant Street/Rte 5
Off Pleasant Street
Off Pleasant Street
Off Pleasant Street
Off Pleasant Street

Drain Line

Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Church Street
Church Street
Church Street
Church Street
Church Street
Church Street
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff


Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

146.61
146.05
147.00
145.11
145.47
144.62
143.24
141.31
147.00
142.60
140.70
142.01
140.00
147.00
147.00
139.04
138.43
139.16
139.15
138.62
138.62
137.80
136.58
134.82
134.82
134.69
135.78
136.15
134.70
134.70
-134.77
133.98
132.68
130.36
129.83
127.20
126.80
127.50
125.20
125.20
125.20
125.20
126.60
127.80
126.50
126.00
127.00
123.00
125.80
126.00
120.80
116.59

142.15
140.54
139.98
139.34
138.68
137.69
133.89
132.20
129.80
136.20
135.31
132.80
132.17
129.80
129.80
129.60
128.56
127.93
127.08
126.20
126.20
125.17
124.63
123.66
123.66
123.08
122.27
121.73
120.35
120.35
119.34
119.34
118.57
118.07
117.02
116.36
115.47
114.50
113.92
116.37
116.37
113.40
113.40
113.05
111.53
109.59
109.01
107.60
106.86
106.64
106.31
105.92
105.71

192.00
187.00
79.00
135.00
224.00
176.00
162.90
233.60
-262.00
191.00
42.60
43.50
--135.90
108.30
296.30
103.70
-226.40
148.00
232.00
-91.70
224.20
88.50
312.40
-247.30
-132.30
94.80
232.70
146.00
160.00
150.00
122.00
124.00
-120.00
-73.70
73.70
259.50
116.20
297.00
235.30
102.00
170.00
212.00
117.60
--

--------19.30
----17.80
37.10
----62.30
---78.30
----147.20
-171.9
--------186.60
-186.60
----------197.10

Existing Pipes

2-YR Storm
10-YR
25-YR
100-YR
Pipe Size
(cfs)
Storm (cfs) Storm (cfs) Storm (cfs)
(in)

--------46.80
----31.80
78.30
----100.40
---114.30
----184.00
-229.70
--------243.00
-10.20
----------221.90

--------56.70
----41.60
97.80
----125.60
---142.90
----234.00
-289.70
--------305.40
-70.00
----------234.90

--------70.40
----55.40
125.20
----161.10
---182.90
----304.10
-373.80
--------392.80
-107.20
----------289.10

--------97.70
----83.40
180.00
----232.00
---183.10
----443.90
-541.70
--------567.10
-281.90
----------296.80

Page 1

15
18
21
21
21
21
30
30
30
18
20
21
21
21
30
30
30
36
36
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
66
66
66
66
66
66
36
36
60
60
60
60
60
66
66
66
66
66
66

Pipe
Mat'l

Manning
"n" value

AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
RC
RC
RC
AC
AC
AC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
Conc
Conc

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

Existing** Peak
Slope (ft/ft) Rate of Runoff
(cfs)

0.0080
0.0030
0.0108
0.0108
0.0044
0.0118
0.0098
0.0101
0.0101
0.0030
0.0100
0.0167
0.0042
0.0042
0.0101
0.0071
0.0054
0.0522
0.0071
0.0071
0.0042
0.0036
0.0037
0.0037
0.0049
0.0032
0.0047
0.0041
0.0041
0.0040
0.0040
0.0040
0.0040
0.0040
0.0045
0.0060
0.0060
0.0050
0.0050
0.0050
0.0055
0.0055
0.00600
0.00600
0.00600
0.00600
0.00540
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200

--------56.70
----41.60
97.80
----125.60
---142.90
----234.00
-289.70
--------305.40
-70.00
----------234.90

Pipes Needed

Comments

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future** Peak
Rate of Runoff
(cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

5.0
5.0
14.3
14.3
9.2
15.0
35.3
36.0
35.9
5.0
12.1
17.8
8.9
8.9
35.9
30.0
26.4
49.6
49.1
89.1
80.8
75.7
76.8
89.1
87.8
71.1
118.3
109.9
113.3
108.6
108.6
108.6
108.6
108.6
170.8
170.8
170.8
170.8
170.8
170.8
49.6
49.6
140.5
140.5
140.5
140.5
140.5
131.2
131.2
131.2
131.2
131.2
131.2

4.1
2.8
6.0
6.0
3.8
6.2
7.2
7.3
7.3
2.8
5.6
7.4
3.7
3.7
7.3
6.1
5.4
7.0
7.0
7.1
6.4
6.0
6.1
7.1
7.0
5.7
7.4
6.9
7.1
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.0
7.0
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5

--------56.7
----44.3
100.5
----128.2
---145.4
----239.2
-295.0
--------310.5
-71.5
----------238.2

--------67.0
----43.2
104.8
----138.1
---176.9
----272.3
-331.6
--------329.4
-76.8
----------272.3

--------36
36
36
36
36
36
48
48
48
48
54
54
54
54
60
60
66
66
66
72
72
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
-42
----------72

--------9.5
----6.1
8.0
----8.1
---7.4
----8.5
-10.0
--------9.4
-7.4
----------8.4

Manage stormwater on-site with BMPs

Existing 36" pipe will work

Existing 66" pipe will work

11/18/2011

Table
King Street/Market Street Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

MH-1146
MH-930
MH-928
MH-929
MH-931
MH-932
MH-963
OUT-61

MH-929
MH-928
MH-929
MH-932
MH-932
MH-963
OUT-61
--

Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave

Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave
Hampton Ave

127.00
127.00
127.00
127.00
127.00
127.00
118.93
118.93

---------

291.67
50.00
15.00
158.33
42.00
71.00
170.00
--

-------7.60

-------19.90

-------24.10

-------30.00

-------41.60

48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48

Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc
Conc

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

0.01000
0.01000
0.01000
0.01000
0.01000
0.11366
0.01000
0.01000

-------24.10

89.1
89.1
89.1
89.1
89.1
89.1
89.1
89.1

7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1

-------24.1

-------104.8

-------48

-------1.9

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 2

11/18/2011

Table
King Street/Market Street Area
Pipe Capacity Analysis

King Street/Market Street Area, Market Street


Location Description
Sub_B
Order
asin

D
D
D
D
H
H
H
H
P
P
P
P
P
P
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
S
S
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
X
X
X
X
X

1
2
3
4
5
6
8
7
9
10
11
12
12a
13
0
2
1
2
3
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

Upstream (US)
ID

MH-1481
MH-1482
MH-1813
MH-1984
MH-1984
MH-1982
MH-1980
MH-1980
MH-1983
MH-1985
MH-1986
MH-1987
MH-1987a
MH-1410
MH-1979
MH-282
MH-1003
MH-291a
MH-291a
MH-291
MH-2229
MH-1988
MH-2230
MH-1989
MH-1409
MH-1409
MH-1410
IN-3567
MH-1822
MH-1825a
MH-1825a
MH-1823
MH-2467
MH-2441
MH-553
MH-553
MH-553A
MH-1662
MH-1661
OUT-77

Downstream
(DS) ID

MH-1482
MH-1984
MH-1984
-MH-1982
MH-1980
-MH-1983
MH-1985
MH-1986
MH-1987
MH-1987a
MH-1410
-MH-1003
MH-1003
MH-291a
-MH-291
MH-2229
MH-1988
MH-2230
MH-1989
MH-1409
-MH-1410
IN-3567
MH-1822
MH-1825a
-MH-1823
MH-2467
MH-2441a
MH-553
-MH-553A
MH-1662
MH-1661
OUT-77
--

Location

Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Market Street
Walnut Ave
Market Street
Market Street
Market Street
Market Street
Market Street
Market Street
Market Street
Market Street
Main Street
Main Street
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad
Railroad

Existing Peak Rates of Runoff

Drain Line

Rim Elevation

Invert Elev.

Pipe Length

Drainage
Area
(acres)

Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Walnut Ave
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main

141.71
141.39
137.15
138.60
139.20
139.20
130.00
130.00
137.60
137.60
136.00
135.00
129.60
129.60
128.43
137.00
128.80
128.80
129.14
130.13
128.82
128.87
128.50
127.63
127.63
131.79
123.00
125.00
122.40
123.20
123.20
124.40
124.00
126.00
120.40
120.40
120.40
121.00
124.00
116.07

--123.10
122.45
122.45
122.00
122.00
121.96
121.89
120.45
119.31
118.18
116.44
116.44
124.14
-120.65
120.65
120.33
120.03
119.27
119.04
118.80
118.56
118.22
118.22
115.72
114.93
114.37
113.85
112.91
111.47
110.75
109.36
108.05
108.05
107.81
106.00
104.18
101.50

312.50
145.83
50.00
-60.00
50.00
-20.00
380.00
300.00
300.00
460.00
190.00
-94.00
33.00
169.00
-151.00
394.00
118.00
124.00
125.00
174.00
51.00
51.00
320.00
230.00
258.00
-200.00
100.00
140.00
380.00
-30.00
230.00
230.00
340.00
--

---14.9
--88.2
------94.4
---22.8
------53.5
----175.8
----188.6
----192.3

Existing Pipes

Box
2-YR Storm
10-YR
25-YR
100-YR
Pipe Size Culvert
(cfs)
Storm (cfs) Storm (cfs) Storm (cfs)
(in)
Area (sq.
in)

---27.8
--66.5
------68.9
---32.1
------95.6
----133.3
----133.6
----131.5

---34.3
--89.0
------90.8
---42.3
------121.9
----199.2
----202.7
----203.3

---43.3
--121.5
------123.6
---56.8
------158.9
----272.2
----276.6
----277.0

---61.0
--188.8
------264.6
---86.4
------233.1
----558.2
----563.1
----560.6

30
36
47
36
48
48
44
44
44
44
44
44
40
40
12
12
18
18
18
18
18
18
21
21
24
24
66
66
72
72
72
72
72
82
82
61
60
60
60
60

------------36x36
36x36
------------54x60
54x60
54x72
54x72
54x72
54x72
54x72
60x72
60x72
48x60
-----

Pipe Mat'l

Manning
"n" value

Slope (ft/ft)

RC
RC
Stone
RC
Stone
Brick
Brick
Brick
Brick
Brick
Brick
Brick
Stone
Stone
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
RC
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone
Br. Arch
Stone
Stone
RC
RC
RC
RC

0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.017
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015

0.00102
0.02907
0.0010
0.02907
0.00200
0.00378
0.00378
0.00378
0.00378
0.00378
0.00378
0.00378
0.00378
0.00378
0.00430
-0.1330
0.00194
0.00194
0.00193
0.00193
0.00195
0.00194
0.00192
0.00195
0.00195
0.03400
0.03400
0.03400
0.00200
0.00200
0.00721
0.00721
0.00721
0.00345
0.00345
0.00789
0.00789
0.00789
0.00789
0.00789

Pipes Needed
Existing**
Peak Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

---34.3
--89.0
------90.8
---42.3
------121.9
---199.2
----202.7
----203.3

Comments

Pipe Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

Future** Peak
Rate of
Runoff (cfs)

Pipe
Capacity
(cfs)

Pipe Size
(in)

Pipe
Velocity
(ft/s)

11.4
49.6
37.5
99.2
56.1
68.0
53.9
53.9
53.9
53.9
53.9
53.9
47.4
47.4
2.0
5.40
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
6.0
6.1
8.7
21.8
170.8
170.8
146.1
146.1
204.2
204.2
204.2
266.9
266.9
145.3
140.5
140.5
140.5
140.5

2.3
7.0
3.1
14.0
4.5
5.4
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.4
5.4
2.6
6.88
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.5
2.5
2.8
6.9
7.2
7.2
5.2
5.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2

---34.3
--94.4
------96.1
---42.3
------127.7
----206.1
----210.3
----211.0

---35.5
--88.3
------88.3
---29.4
------63.5
----189.4
----248.8
----176.9

---30
-48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
24
24
36
36
36
36
48
48
48
48
48
----72
----72
----60

---7.0
--7.0
------7.0
---4.2
------5.1
----6.7
----8.8
----10.7

Existing 72" pipe will work

In good condition in 1981

Existing 60" pipe will work

Notes:
(PCCP) Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
(VC/CC) Vitrified Clay Pipe
(RCP) Reinforced Concrete Pipe
italicized slopes are estimated based on ground surface elevation
Bold Pipe Capacity values are calculated using the Orifice Equation
Bold Pipe Velocity values are calculated using future peak rate of runoff
Pipe Capacity values not bolded are calculated using Manning's Formula
Red Pipe Size indicates pipe upgrade needed
*Orifice Equation Pipe Capacity is calculated assuming head can rise 1 ft above crown
**Existing and Future Peak Rates of Runoff are based on 10-year storm events

GAGENJL

Page 1

11/18/2011

Appendix D
Detailed Debt Service Schedule

Northampton Projected Debt Service by Project

Bridge Street/Meadows Phase 1 Improvements


River Road Floodwall Improvements
Roberts Meadow Brook Channel Improvements
Federal Street Retaining Wall Improvements
Elm Street Brook/Florence Area Phase 1 Improvements
King Street/Market Street Area Phase 1 and 2 Improvements
Levee Certification
Levee Capital Improvements
Flood Control Pumping Station Upgrades
West Street Portable Pumps
Austin Circle/Ryan Road Area Phase 2 Improvements
Bridge Street/Meadows Area Phase 3 Improvements
Elm Street Brook/Florence Area Phase 3 Improvements
King Street/Market Street Area Phase 3 and 4 Improvements
EPA MS4 Permit Requirements Allowance
Annual Allowance for Drainage Infrastructure
Municipal Green Design/Construction Allowance
Total Capital Cost

2012
$0
$4,305
$1,213
$0
$0
$0
$7,638
$7,777
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$6,944
$13,888
$7,166
$48,931

2013
$12,249
$56,687
$18,554
$0
$0
$0
$36,611
$37,138
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$33,283
$66,565
$34,542
$295,629

2014
$187,337
$168,981
$57,403
$0
$0
$0
$57,182
$59,250
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$58,927
$117,854
$61,967
$768,901

2015
$579,601
$164,515
$55,886
$0
$0
$0
$55,654
$80,023
$38,635
$1,278
$0
$0
$0
$0
$83,877
$167,755
$89,499
$1,316,723

2016
$564,288
$160,049
$54,370
$0
$14,332
$0
$54,127
$128,521
$590,894
$19,650
$0
$0
$0
$0
$108,133
$216,266
$117,143
$2,027,773

2017
$548,976
$155,583
$52,853
$3,333
$219,319
$25,303
$52,599
$125,027
$1,828,165
$60,873
$0
$0
$0
$0
$124,751
$263,389
$144,954
$3,605,126

2018
$533,664
$151,116
$51,337
$50,972
$678,637
$239,298
$51,071
$121,533
$1,779,868
$59,265
$0
$0
$0
$0
$121,279
$309,123
$172,881
$4,320,044

2019
$518,351
$146,650
$49,820
$157,700
$660,709
$784,708
$49,544
$118,039
$1,731,570
$57,657
$0
$0
$0
$0
$117,807
$353,468
$200,876
$4,946,898

2020
$503,039
$142,184
$48,304
$153,534
$642,780
$1,180,187
$48,016
$114,545
$1,683,272
$56,049
$9,082
$0
$0
$0
$114,335
$396,425
$229,043
$5,320,794

2021
$487,727
$137,718
$46,787
$149,368
$624,851
$1,148,562
$46,488
$111,051
$1,634,974
$54,440
$138,802
$0
$0
$0
$110,863
$437,993
$257,307
$5,386,930

Bridge Street/Meadows Phase 1 Improvements


River Road Floodwall Improvements
Roberts Meadow Brook Channel Improvements
Federal Street Retaining Wall Improvements
Elm Street Brook/Florence Area Phase 1 Improvements
King Street/Market Street Area Phase 1 and 2 Improvements
Levee Certification
Levee Capital Improvements
Flood Control Pumping Station Upgrades
West Street Portable Pumps
Austin Circle/Ryan Road Area Phase 2 Improvements
Bridge Street/Meadows Area Phase 3 Improvements
Elm Street Brook/Florence Area Phase 3 Improvements
King Street/Market Street Area Phase 3 and 4 Improvements
EPA MS4 Permit Requirements Allowance
Annual Allowance for Drainage Infrastructure
Municipal Green Design/Construction Allowance
Total Capital Cost

2022
$472,414
$133,252
$45,271
$145,201
$606,922
$1,116,937
$44,961
$107,557
$1,586,676
$52,832
$429,364
$12,443
$0
$0
$107,391
$478,172
$285,718
$5,625,111

2023
$457,102
$128,785
$43,754
$141,035
$588,994
$1,085,313
$43,433
$104,062
$1,538,378
$51,224
$418,021
$190,407
$28,692
$0
$103,920
$516,962
$314,250
$5,754,331

2024
$441,789
$124,319
$42,238
$136,869
$571,065
$1,053,688
$41,906
$100,568
$1,490,080
$49,616
$406,678
$589,169
$271,316
$0
$100,448
$554,364
$342,901
$6,317,013

2025
$426,477
$119,853
$40,721
$132,703
$553,136
$1,022,064
$40,378
$97,074
$1,441,782
$48,008
$395,334
$573,603
$889,638
$17,859
$96,976
$590,377
$371,723
$6,857,706

2026
$411,165
$115,387
$39,205
$128,536
$535,207
$990,439
$38,850
$93,580
$1,393,484
$46,400
$383,991
$558,038
$1,337,944
$168,928
$93,504
$625,001
$400,685
$7,360,343

2027
$395,852
$110,920
$37,688
$124,370
$517,279
$958,814
$37,323
$90,086
$1,345,186
$44,791
$372,648
$542,473
$1,302,092
$553,980
$90,032
$658,236
$429,784
$7,611,554

2028
$380,540
$106,454
$36,172
$120,204
$499,350
$927,190
$35,795
$86,592
$1,296,888
$43,183
$361,304
$526,908
$1,266,240
$833,158
$86,560
$690,083
$459,066
$7,755,686

2029
$365,228
$101,988
$34,655
$116,038
$481,421
$895,565
$34,267
$83,098
$1,248,590
$41,575
$349,961
$511,343
$1,230,388
$810,833
$83,088
$720,540
$488,526
$7,597,104

2030
$349,915
$97,522
$33,139
$111,871
$463,492
$863,940
$32,740
$79,604
$1,200,292
$39,967
$338,618
$495,778
$1,194,536
$788,507
$79,616
$749,609
$518,182
$7,437,328

2031
$334,603
$93,056
$31,622
$107,705
$445,563
$832,316
$31,212
$76,110
$1,151,994
$38,359
$327,274
$480,213
$1,158,684
$766,182
$76,145
$777,290
$547,973
$7,276,300

Note:
The City currently has $250,000 in authorized borrowing not yet spent for general stormwater-related projects in FY 2012, not included as part of this Appendix. The annual debt service on that amount is estimated to be
$20,920 through FY 2021. As a result, the totals in this table will not exactly match the anticipated debt service line in Section 5.3.3 of the report.

1 of 2

Northampton Projected Debt Service by Project

Bridge Street/Meadows Phase 1 Improvements


River Road Floodwall Improvements
Roberts Meadow Brook Channel Improvements
Federal Street Retaining Wall Improvements
Elm Street Brook/Florence Area Phase 1 Improvements
King Street/Market Street Area Phase 1 and 2 Improvements
Levee Certification
Levee Capital Improvements
Flood Control Pumping Station Upgrades
West Street Portable Pumps
Austin Circle/Ryan Road Area Phase 2 Improvements
Bridge Street/Meadows Area Phase 3 Improvements
Elm Street Brook/Florence Area Phase 3 Improvements
King Street/Market Street Area Phase 3 and 4 Improvements
EPA MS4 Permit Requirements Allowance
Annual Allowance for Drainage Infrastructure
Municipal Green Design/Construction Allowance
Total Capital Cost

2032
$319,291
$88,589
$30,106
$103,539
$427,635
$800,691
$29,685
$72,616
$1,103,696
$36,751
$315,931
$464,648
$1,122,832
$743,856
$72,673
$789,694
$565,080
$7,087,311

2033
$303,978
$76,403
$26,414
$99,373
$409,706
$769,067
$14,460
$55,176
$1,055,398
$35,142
$304,588
$449,083
$1,086,980
$721,530
$56,749
$737,016
$533,016
$6,734,079

2034
$266,702
$0
$0
$95,206
$391,777
$737,442
$0
$38,763
$1,007,100
$33,534
$293,244
$433,518
$1,051,128
$699,205
$41,520
$685,727
$501,319
$6,276,186

2035
$0
$0
$0
$91,040
$373,848
$705,817
$0
$34,021
$958,802
$31,926
$281,901
$417,952
$1,015,276
$676,879
$26,986
$635,827
$469,960
$5,720,237

2036
$0
$0
$0
$86,874
$355,920
$674,193
$0
$0
$841,225
$28,027
$270,558
$402,387
$979,424
$654,554
$13,146
$587,315
$438,961
$5,332,583

2037
$0
$0
$0
$82,708
$312,291
$642,568
$0
$0
$0
$0
$259,214
$386,822
$943,572
$632,228
$0
$540,192
$408,294
$4,207,890

2038
$0
$0
$0
$72,565
$0
$565,571
$0
$0
$0
$0
$247,871
$371,257
$907,720
$609,903
$0
$494,458
$377,984
$3,647,329

2039
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$279,479
$0
$0
$0
$0
$236,528
$355,692
$871,868
$587,577
$0
$450,113
$348,106
$3,129,364

2040
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$225,185
$340,127
$836,016
$565,252
$0
$407,156
$318,583
$2,692,319

2041
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$197,555
$324,562
$800,164
$542,926
$0
$365,588
$289,492
$2,520,288

Bridge Street/Meadows Phase 1 Improvements


River Road Floodwall Improvements
Roberts Meadow Brook Channel Improvements
Federal Street Retaining Wall Improvements
Elm Street Brook/Florence Area Phase 1 Improvements
King Street/Market Street Area Phase 1 and 2 Improvements
Levee Certification
Levee Capital Improvements
Flood Control Pumping Station Upgrades
West Street Portable Pumps
Austin Circle/Ryan Road Area Phase 2 Improvements
Bridge Street/Meadows Area Phase 3 Improvements
Elm Street Brook/Florence Area Phase 3 Improvements
King Street/Market Street Area Phase 3 and 4 Improvements
EPA MS4 Permit Requirements Allowance
Annual Allowance for Drainage Infrastructure
Municipal Green Design/Construction Allowance
Total Capital Cost

2042
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$308,997
$764,312
$520,601
$0
$325,409
$260,809
$2,180,128

2043
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$271,119
$728,460
$498,275
$0
$286,619
$232,561
$2,017,034

2044
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$641,159
$475,949
$0
$249,218
$204,775
$1,571,101

2045
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$316,813
$453,624
$0
$213,205
$177,431
$1,161,073

2046
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$399,273
$0
$178,581
$150,558
$728,412

2047
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$197,292
$0
$145,345
$124,187
$466,824

2048
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$113,499
$98,299
$211,798

2049
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$83,041
$72,927
$155,968

2050
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$53,972
$48,054
$102,026

2051
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$26,292
$23,768
$50,059

Note:
The City currently has $250,000 in authorized borrowing not yet spent for general stormwater-related projects in FY 2012, not included as part of this Appendix. The annual debt service on that amount is estimated to be
$20,920 through FY 2021. As a result, the totals in this table will not exactly match the anticipated debt service line in Section 5.3.3 of the report.

2 of 2

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen