Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Narendra Murkumbi
Vice-Chairman & Managing Director, Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd President, Indian Sugar Mills Association
Agenda
2
5 3
25 20 15 10
1
-1 -3 -5
5
0
Export Sr. 1 2 Particular (in million MT) Sugar Production Sugar Consumption
Import
Production
Consumption
* CAGR for 20 years for 3-year moving average of Sugar Production & Sugar Consumption
30
7,000
6,500
6,000
356 278 280 289 299 296 297 287 234 4,520 4,316 4,412 4,220 3,938 3,661 237
400
348 339
350 300
In 000 hectares
281
281
5,151 5,055
250 200
3,930
4,055
4,202
150
100 50 0
Area under cane Sr. 1 2 Particular Area under cane (ha) Cane Production (million MT) 1991-92 3,844 254
Cane Production 2010-11 (P) 4,944 339 Growth Rate (%)* 1.3% 1.5%
* CAGR for 20 years for 3-year moving average of Area Under Cane & Cane Production
In million MT
5,500
100 90
10.0% 10.3% 10.0% 9.9% 9.4% 9.9% 10.0% 9.9% 10.2% 10.5%
10.6%
11.0%
10.2% 10.2%
10.3%
10.4%
10.2% 10.2%
10.2% 10.2%
in MT/hectare
10.0%
10.0% 9.0%
80
71 71
68 67 71 71
70 60 50
66
67 64
69
67 64 59
65
67
69
69 65
70
69
Cane Yield
Sr. 1 2
* Simple Average taken for Cane Yield and Sugar Recovery for a 20-year period from 1991-92 to 2010-11
400
356
100%
348 292 339 285
350
in million MT
276
281
278
280
289
299
296
297
287
79%
281 234 237
279
80%
71%
240
72%
250
68%
67%
62%
54% 55%
175 47%
63%
53%
45% 43%
134
57% 53%
133
60%
189
51%
145
186
150
100 50
148
46%
129
158 125
130
103
40%
98
20%
Cane Production
Cane Crushed
Drawal Rate
Note: Cane diversion for Gur & Khandsari results in a Drawal rate of about 70% for sugar production
Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Gujarat are the major sugar producing states in India
Sugar Producing Capacity of Major States in India
in '000 MT of cane crushed per day 2,500 2,000 1,500
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
in million MT of Sugar
1,000
500
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
Karnataka
Tamil Nadu
Gujarat
10
30
8 in million MT
25
20
6 15 4
10
2 5 0
India
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
Karnataka
Tamil Nadu
Gujarat
in million MT
30
25
In million MT
Production
20 15 10 5 0
Consumption
2000-01
2010-11
2020-21 (E)
Growth in sugar production and consumption estimated as the 20-year CAGR from 1991-92 to 2010-11
Key Observations
11
Per capita consumption of sugar will increase due to GDP growth and lifestyle changes which encourage use of processed foods Limited availability of irrigated land and lack of progress in farm productivity stunts expansion of production
No. of Sugar Mills in India Installed Sugar Production Capacity Cane Crushed Sugar Produced
5
6
Industry Revenue
Cane Payment
Causes of Cyclicality:
Fluctuations in sugar prices Falling sugar prices against a stable or at times unaffordable cane prices Weather conditions Competition from other crops
Low Cane Arrears Decline in Area under Cultivation
Improved Profitability
Lower Sugar Production
60
28.4
30
50
40
16.5 18.2 18.5 14.6 12.9 12.9 10.6 9.8 15.11 10.65 6.27 4.18 6.12 2.15 5.98 11.98 8.92 6.32 6.88 15.5 32.04 18.72 18.5 20.1 19.3
25
20
in million MT
30 13.4
15
20
10 0
10
7.09
5 0
Cane Arrears
Note: Cane Arrears as on 30th April of each crushing season
Sugar Production
in billion Rs.
Sr. 1 2 3 4 5
* Data has been calculated for 84 Cooperative Sugar Mills and 25 private sugar companies
Managed imports without direct intervention of the Government Managed large exports during surplus sugar years Shown flexibility to manage cyclical surplus/deficit of sugar (ALS) Indian Sugar Trade
5.0 2.6 0.6 0.4 1.0 0.1 (0.2) (2.0) 0.4 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 (0.4) 1.1 1.8 0.3 (0.1) 0.0 1.1 1.7 0.2 0.2
In million MT
0.0
(0.9) (1.0)
Sugar Exports
Sugar Imports
GOVT
Cane Area Reservation Fair & Remunerative Price (FRP)
POLICY
Soil degradation due to unbalanced use of nitrogen fertilizers No new major irrigation dams being built in India Rapid ground-water depletion with several states in critical condition
Electricity supplies free or very cheap but increasingly restricted in time and quality
Productivity
21
99% of cane is manually harvested in green condition Labor shortages rising rapidly , especially in peninsular India Farm mechanization difficult due to small fields & lack of coordinated planting
North India and Tamil Nadu (about 50% of production) are governed by State Advised Prices
Government controls on domestic sales and exports make commercial planning very difficult
In Rs. per MT
30,000
20,000
10,000 Sep-04
Sep-05
Sep-06
Sep-07
Sep-08
Sep-09
Sep-10
Sep-11
Spot Price
Source: National Commodity Derivatives Exchange Spot Price of Sugar as quoted in Muzaffarnagar (Uttar Pradesh)
Price linkage between sugarcane and product revenues (sugar + by-products) Move sugarcane price fixation from political to economic domain Mechanism to allow farmers to fix forward prices for sugarcane for upto two seasons at the time of planting
in million MT
Jun-10
Jul-10
Jan-11
Jun-11
Jul-11
Sep-10
Nov-10
Dec-10
Mar-11
Aug-10
Apr-11
May-10
May-11
Aug-11
Sep-11
Oct-10
Feb-11
in million MT
Jul-11
Dec-09
Dec-10
Mar-11
Apr-10
Feb-10
Aug-10
Apr-11
May-10
Potential
Substantial savings in inventory carrying cost Continuous presence in world sugar markets
May-11
Aug-11
Sep-11
Oct-09
Oct-10
Feb-11
Only industry in India to bear the burden of a social welfare program Govt. should buy sugar for distribution in the Public Distribution system through an auction process
Removes govt. interference in sales Enables mills to sell sugar as per their cashflow needs Reduces high inventory burden on sugar mills
Thank You