The New World Dystopian Agenda: Quotes and Notes

"There is a point to this: seek truth." - Photohelix (youtube) "Thats how it works - prison without the bars - and until it is exposed it will go on forever." - David Icke

"There comes a time when silence is betrayal. that time has come for us." - Martin Luthur King Jr. "The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monsterous he cannot believe it exists." - J. Edger Hoover "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had mens views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States (1856-1924) I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the British Empire on which the sun never sets. The man that controls Britains money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply. - Baron Nathan Mayer

de Rothschild (1840-1915) "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." - Franklin D. Roosevelt "The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help." Ronald Reagan

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries." -- David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991 "Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution [unequivocal hell?], it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history." David Rockefeller "You know, gentlemen, that I do not owe any personal income tax. But nevertheless, I send a small check, now and then, to the Internal Revenue Service out of the kindness of my heart."- David Rockefeller, before a Congressional committee "...conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." -----David Rockefeller

Andrew Jackson: "You are a den of vipers! I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning!" George Washington: 1798 Acknowledged that Illuminati activity had come to the USA: It is not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and the principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no

one is more satisfied of this fact than I am. Thomas Jefferson: 1816 If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. BANKER: Mayer Amschel Rothschild 1828 Allow me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who writes the laws. [Even a 4 year old can understand that people with control of money...write the laws!] General Douglas MasArthur: "I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." Felix Frankfuter, Supreme Court Justice: "The Order's working and involvement in America is immense. The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes." Mayor John F. Hylan of New York: "The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation." George W. Malone, US Senator: "I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election... It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States." Dr. Adam [Spartacus] Weishaupt: Of all the means I know to lead men, the most effectual is a concealed mystery. The hankering of the mind is irresistible. President Andrew Jackson: 1829-1837 You are a den of vipers! I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning. President Woodrow Wilson: 1916 I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men. Winston Churchill: 1920 From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl

Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played a definitely recognizable role in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century, and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads, and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. President Franklin Roosevelt: Nov. 21, 1933, The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the government since the days of Andrew Jackson. Mikhail Gorbachev: Nov. 2, 1987 addressed the Soviet Politburo: In October 1917, we parted with the old world, rejecting it once and for all. We are moving toward a new world, the world of Communism. We shall never turn off that road!? He further reassures his Communist colleagues: Comrades, do not be concerned about all that you hear about glasnost and perestroika and democracy in the coming years. These are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant internal change within the Soviet Union other than for cosmetic purposes. Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep. BANKER: David Rockefeller Sept. 23, 1994 "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." Sounds like an admission of guilt to September 11, 2001 and the other events after 1994! Karl Wojtyla: AKA Pope John Paul II "By the end of this decade we will live under the first One World Government that has ever existed in the society of nations... a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of survival. One world government is inevitable." George Herbert Walker Bush: September 11, 1990: Out of these troubled times, our objectivea new world ordercan emerge. Today, that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we have known. George Herbert Walker Bush: What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big ideaa new world order...to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind... based on shared principles and the rule of law... The illumination of a thousand points of light... The winds of change are with us now. Jonathan Winston Howard: March 13, 2003 in an National Address to the

Australian's The decade of the nineteen nineties was meant to have been one in which a NEW [WORLD] INTERNATIONAL ORDER, free of the by polar rivalry of earlier days, was to have been established Sounds like another admission of guilt! Mr. Howard's bosses... the Sovereign Australian people were never asked if they would like to open their country up to the International bankers ORDER!

More New World Order Quotes "The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli of England, in 1844. "The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England ... (and) ... believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established." Professor of History Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University, in his book "Tragedy and Hope". "For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure one world, if you will. If thats the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefeller, from his own book, Memoirs. "Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." Woodrow Wilson "[The New World Order] cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change it's perceptions." Henry Kissinger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel, April 19th 1994 "David Rockefeller is the most conspicuous representative today of the ruling class,

a multinational fraternity of men who shape the global economy and manage the flow of its capital. Rockefeller was born to it, and he has made the most of it. But what some critics see as a vast international conspiracy, he considers a circumstance of life and just another day's work... In the world of David Rockefeller it's hard to tell where business ends and politics begins" Bill Moyers "We know in the not too distant future, a half dozen corporations are going to control the media. We took this step (merger) to ensure we were one of them" Time Warner spokesperson. "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." -- Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg ("Angel" to and active in the United World Federalists), son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. which poured millions into the Russian Revolution through James' brother Max, banker to the German government See the Sisson Report "All of us will ultimately be judged on the effort we have contributed to building a NEW WORLD ORDER." Robert Kennedy, former U.S. Attorney-General, 1967. "The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes." Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court. "I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." General Douglas MacArthur "For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from it's original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy making arm of the government." President Harry Truman "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson." U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a letter written Nov. 21, 1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House. "The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant

octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation."-- Mayor (1918-1925) John F. Hylan of New York. "Fundamental Bible-believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the state, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one-world global society and their children will not fit in." --Nebraska State Senator Peter Hoagland, speaking on radio in 1983. "When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of freedom to Americans..." "And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the Housing Projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make the people feel safer in their communities"--President Bill Clinton 3-22-94, MTV's "Enough is Enough" "We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans.." Bill Clinton USA Today--3-11-93, page 2a "Gun registration is not enough" (Attorney General Janet Reno, 12-10-93) Associated Press "Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal"--Janet Reno "If a nation values anything more than freedom, then it will lose it's freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort and security that it values, it will lose that too. Unknown Americans must decide: Are we to be governed by Americans or by an International organization ? I, for one, owe no allegiance to the United Nations nor will I give it any. I obey only the U.S. Constitution. You had better think about this issue, for if the U.N. can violate the Sovereignty of Haiti, Iraq and other countries, it can violate ours...The United States may not be the top dog 15 years from now. U.N. security council resolutions, backed by say Chinese soldiers, could be aimed at us."-

Charley Reese-Orlando Sentinel "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto determination practiced in past centuries"--David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991 "From the days of Sparticus, Weishaupt, Karl Marx, Trotski, belacoon, Rosa Luxenberg and Ema Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the under- world of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire."--Winston Churchill to the London press in 1922. "The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power--Political, Monetary, Intellectual, and Ecclesiastical."-U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater from his 1964 book "No Apologies" "I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election....It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the

United States!" --George W. Malone, U.S. Senator (Nevada), speaking before Congress in1957. "The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government ..." -- AMERICAN MERCURY MAGAZINE, December 1957, pg. 92. "The Air Force is suffering from pilots who have lost faith in their generals, jet engines that still don't work after repairs and maintenance depots with 'little quality or quantity of work being produced', according to an internal Defense Department memorandum. The draft memo paints a troubling picture of the state of American air power. 'The sad state of air-force readiness can be blamed on the Clinton Administration, which treats the military as a toy to be deployed for meals-on-wheels-type missions without due consideration for it's impact on readiness", said Robert Maginnis, a retired Army Lieutenant colonel and an analyst at the conservative Family Research Council "The International government of the United Nations, stripped of it's legal trimming, then, is really the International Government of the United States and the Soviet Union acting in Unison." From the American Jewish Committee's official magazine "Commentary" of Nov. 1958, Pg. 376 "War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in 20 or 30 years...The Bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clinched fist."

Dimitry Z. Manuilsky in a speech made in 1931 before the Lenin School of Political Warfare. (He became an officer of the U.N. Security Council in 1949) "We must realize that we cannot co-exist eternally. One of us must go to his grave. We do not want to go to the grave. They do not want to go to the grave, either. So what can be done? We must push them to their grave." -- Sewren Bailer, a polish communist leader, who defected to the west, charged that in April, 1955 Khrushchev said this to a group of Warsaw Communists. "We operate here under directives which emulate (sic) from the White House ... The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the United States so that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union." -- Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation, 1954. "The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day's sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow." -Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915 "The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world." -M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919) "If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands." -- Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book "International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World"

(1931) "... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people." -- H. G. Wells, in his book entitled "The New World Order" (1939) "The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a 'League of Nations' or a 'Federated Union' to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the 'New International Order,' 'The New World Order,' 'World Union Now,' 'World Commonwealth of Nations,' 'World Community,' etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual." -- excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940) "In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of 'justice and peace.'" -excerpt from article entitled "New World Order Pledged to Jews," in the New York Times (October 1940) "If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order." -The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states. "New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor" -title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942) "Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an

international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis." -text of article in the Philadelphia Inquirer (June 1942) "The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God." -- American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in the New York Times (December 1942) "There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper." -Norman Thomas, in his book "What Is Our Destiny" (1944) "He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order." -- excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in the Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944) "The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, 'has not been able-nor can it be able--to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.' ... The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, 'urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'" -- Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled "Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order" -- New York Times (February 1962) "The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order." -- Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967) "He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building 'a new world order.'" -- excerpt from an article in the New York Times (February 1972)

"If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis ... In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault." -Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974) "The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species." -- Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled "Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions," in the book "On the Creation of a Just World Order" (1975) "My country's history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order." -- Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975) "At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt's time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order." -- part of article in the New York Times (November 1975) "A New World Order" -- title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H. Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977) "Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order." -- Mikhail Gorbachev, in

an address at the United Nations (December 1988) "We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms." -- Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in the Washington Post (May 1991) "We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt's and Winston Churchill's vision for peace for the postwar period." -- Richard Gephardt, in the Wall Street Journal (September 1990) "If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long." -President George Bush (January 1991) "But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush's mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council." -excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in the New York Times (January 1991) "I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a 'new world order' based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court." -- George McGovern, in the New York Times (February 1991) "... it's Bush's baby, even if he shares its popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler 'new order' root; F. D. R. used the phrase earlier." -- William Safire, in the New York Times (February 1991) "How I Learned to Love the New World Order" -article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in the Wall Street Journal (April 1992) "How to Achieve The New World Order" -title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994) "The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth - in Morocco - to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund." -- part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in the New York Times (April 1994) "New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State" -- title of article by Kenichi

Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in the Wall Street Journal (August 1994) The "new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all." -- Nelson Mandela, in the Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994) The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important "for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order." -- President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in the New York Times (April 1995) "Alchemy for a New World Order" -- article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995) "We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." -- Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995) Dr. Hames W. Wardner: "The CFR, est. in New York on July 29, 1921, was a front for J.P. Morgan and Company (in itself a front for Rothschild banking) in association with this country's American Round Table Group... Since 1925, substantial contributions from wealthy individuals and foundations associated with the international banking fraternity have financed the activirtes of the Round Table group known as the CFR." "By controlling government through the CFR, the power brokers are able to control America's economy, politics, law, education, and day-to-day subsistence... The CFR is an extension of the old-wolrd imperialistic British oligarchy." Congressman John R. Rarick: "The Council on Foreign Relations is dedicated to one-world government... and for converting the US from a sovereign Constituional Republic into a servile member state of one-world dictatorship." "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries." -- David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991 "Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution [unequivocal hell?], it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but

also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history." David Rockefeller "You know, gentlemen, that I do not owe any personal income tax. But nevertheless, I send a small check, now and then, to the Internal Revenue Service out of the kindness of my heart."- David Rockefeller, before a Congressional committee "...conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." -----David Rockefeller Despite the apparent efforts of our American forefathers, there are no social or political mechanisms in place for checking and balancing who can or cannot should or should not - enter the elite power-positions of politics, finance, media, society, military, etc.: therefore it has always served as a safe-haven for coldcalculating occultists puppeted by either benevolently spiritual masters ('angels') &/or manevolently sadistic superiors ('demons') - the perfect haven for evil is itself ignorance. Reality has become a desert (Baudrillard) of desensetized virtuality: the people are no longer fighting as one for freedom because they aren't yet fully aware of the new and improved, although still not-too-subtle, implementation of massmanipulation. There are many different dimensions and degrees determining the title for various forms of enslavement as such - forced labor via physical or psychological manipulation - of which pain & suffering is the most common type. Terror is a most useful tool for both the psychological and physical manipulation - practical control of others' knowledge & subsequent intellect, behavior & well-being - 'Spirit.' Slavery ends when self-realization is achieved: a discovery proving that the world in-itself is a direct product of y/our personal, exclusively all-inclusive (omnipresent) omnipotence. "Rich: So, if the noble lie is some type of conealment or ommission, it takes away your free will your right to make an informed choice; if governments are using the noble lie to spread democracy by force, what would that equate to? "Art: Obviously its terrorism; its just yet another word which they've taken to redefine as anyone who opposes government tyranny, force, coercion and violence." - What You've Been Missing documentary Books - Behold a Pale Horse (William Cooper), Pawns in the Game (William Guy

Carr), Confessions of an Economic Hitman (John Perkins), An Occult History of DNA from Eden to Armageddon (Aeolus Kephas), Tragedy & Hope (Carroll Quigley), Human Race Get Off Your Knees (David Icke), Brave New World / Revisted (Aldus Huxley), 1984 & Animal Farm (George Orwell) Documentaries - David Wilcock's Source Field Investigations (youtube), Nassim Haramein (theresonanceproject.com; youtube), Invisible Empire (Jason Bermas), William Cooper and His Death (youtube documentary), On Modern Servitude (Jean Franois Brient), Water - The Great Mystery (documentary; facebook, youtube)

It is your right to believe whatever you want, but reality will always have the final say in what you are and what is: so why not just face reality? Sometimes this is easier said than done: it can be difficult to notice when you are thinking irrationally either because you've been conditioned to think as such, feel threatened into thinking as such, &/or cannot overcome your ego in accepting a truth counter to your learned perspective. For many people it takes real-life experience to learn the value of accepting reality for it-self/selves; whereas others are fortunate enough to come across some person, book, event, etc. which gives them an insight into the true value of truth; and some fortunate others still have a natural intuition - defense mechanism - which tells them that truth will always keep them safe(r) &/or set them free. The following evidence seeks to confirm the intuition of some and convert the beliefs of others: but in every case seeks to drastically improve the spiritual and intellectual clarity of every soul fortunate enough to come across it. Never assume that a monolithic conspiracy cannot exist: those who believe this have not properly taken the time to think about what would keep such a thing from occuring. Never assume that nobody has a reason to belong to a monolithic conspiracy. Aside from the fact that we humans have no clue what riches could tempt occultists into a new world order agenda and mass blood rituals as such, etc. everyone with common sense should be well aware that there are endless earthly riches capable of tempting one into ruling the world as such. An ancient, practiced, hierarchialized and compartmentalized system of blackmail and bribery at the highest levels of politics, intelligence, finance, education, media, and secret societies in general are more than capable of keeping a cohesive system of secrecy in tact as long as they have appeared to. There is no government organization out there who job is to make sure no secret society infiltrates our government to work against the best interest of our people: on the contrary, such whistle blowers get fired from the

FBI and other organizations for trying to expose the true puppet-masters behind events such as economic collapse, false flag terror, cointellpro propaganda, etc. Occult elistist such as the Rockefellers explicitly admit to belong to such a cabal; America explicitly handed its soverignty over to a private group of international bankers: the public is very much asleep.

"I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future--for reducing this threat or living with it-there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security--a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity. This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President--two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy. The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that its in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know. But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In times of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.

Today no war has been declared and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired. If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent. It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match. Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security--and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion. For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money. The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only

the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted. That question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration. On many earlier occasions, I have said--and your newspapers have constantly said-that these are times that appeal to every citizen's sense of sacrifice and selfdiscipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal. I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all. Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: "Is it news?" All I suggest is that you add the question: "Is it in the interest of the national security?" And I hope that every group in America--unions and businessmen and public officials at every level will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to the same exacting tests. And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate wholeheartedly with those recommendations. Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history. It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation--an obligation which I share and that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well--the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition and both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed. I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers--I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors and we expect you to point them out when we miss them. Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution--not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion. This means greater coverage and analysis of international news--for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security--and we intend to do it. It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world's efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure. And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news--that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent." - John F. Kennedy

Many of the rich - the global elite [Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan, Lazard, Warburg, Schroder and Schiff] - throughout history have insisted that the poor are the authors of their situation. This is just one of the many sophistic lines they must endorse in order to keep up their defenses. In reality, they know that the system they run requires a fixed variable of war, famine, disease, catastrophe, genocide, economic collapse, slavery, drugs, disinformation, etc.: for they work night and day to keep up this thin veil which separates the status quo from fullfledged revolution. However, to quite some extent, our slavery is self-inflicted: we simply chose to stay silent - chose to pretend there is nothing one can do. So long as we convince ourselves that they're right when they tell us there is no point - no hope - we will be making sure there isn't by blindly believing so. If we don't start controlling our population reproduction in accordance with our environment, if we don't start investigating 9/11 and UFO's, what do we deserve? You should never be afraid of feeling belittled by either the perceived superiority of another or by the seemingly inferior ways in which you may come off to others: for if anyone should be feeling such things (which again obviously nobody should) it would be the ones who are ignorant of the fact that nobody can act beyond their better knowledge. We are sometimes told to love ourselves: however, from the day we develope our personalities, most of us are not given the means, the knowledge, nor the support with which to properly achieve or even understand this process. We do know how to live because we don't know who we are. What do we stand to gain by automatically believing that there is no monolithic conspiracy behind events such as 9/11, Bohemian Grove, UFO phenomena, the Federal Reserve, economic hitmen, etc.? What would we stand to gain by presuming that any such evidence would be useless to our salvation? If an alien threat would unite humanity in common cause, why wouldn't a secret society behind the new world order not provide us with the same catalyst? The crimes committed by this shadow elite are so vast and pervasive that it would provide the world with the necessary motivation to totally reform our system according to sustainable utilitarianism rather than the blind polarization, corruption, and conspiracy of private capital and empire. Likewise, what would we stand to gain in ignoring a proof for omnipresence which would grant us the potential to overcome any adversarial force? Such a proof cannot be expressed in numbers: contemporary ontology has provided us with the ultimatum - others or God. However, only the latter can recover the former (in a 'redeeming' fashion). "I believe that all culture must have arisen from cult. Origionally, all of the facets of our culture, whether they be in the arts or in the sciences, were the province of the shaman. The fact that in present times this magical power has degenerated to the

level of cheap entertainment and manipulation is, I think, a tragedy. At the moment, the people who are using shamanism and magic to shape our culture are advertisers. Rather than trying to wake people up, their shamanism is used as an opiate to tranquilize people; to make people more manipulatable. Their magic box of television, and by their magic words, their jingles [pied piper], can cause everybody in the country to be thinking the same words and have the same banal thoughts all at exactly the same moment." - The Mindscape of Alan Moore (V for Vendetta) Masses of people born into and conditioned by the same general situation under an inter/national disinformation system, dumbed down education system, polluted & poisonous environment, food/water supply, constant physical & psychological distractions incorporating brutal but subtle desensetizations, banalities, financial & spiritual struggles, etc. for a good century and they will not care about the evidence proving the artificial manipulation of such a vulnerably ignorant population: they practically won't care about their true potential, the potential of others, their own guilt, the guilt of others, everyone's redemptive dimension, nor the responsibility they owe to the reality of their true identity. They won't believe in anything that might make it worth moving beyond the paralyzing tragedy that is our civilization. The tales of flying yogis in the Himilayas or vampirific occultists in the White House aren't going to sway this public unless some capable people not only spread the hard evidence & instructive means by which we can use it to make such awareness conventionally unavoidable but, also, we're going to need a substantial leap forward in our mode of thinking &/or relating to one another. The adversarial shamans are elite leaders in global politics, finance, media, military, academia, society, and therefore almost everything mainstream (& then some). Freemasons such as Lennin, for example, were adversarial agents sent to spread their 'red terror' and thereby dramatically progress the 'Antichrist agenda.' President Bush senior and junior are both Bohemian Grove and Skull and Bonesmen. Tony Blair draws a circle every morning and seizures on the floor. There is no secret: the Devil's chains have always been large enough to step out of (if not always then atleast after the first coming of the 'savior's' - 'Christ's' - prophesized & prophetic incarnation). The relative freedoms we're alotted are made available to a roughly determined variable of people because the world's many distractions combined with the sophistic skills of this silent oligarchy motivate the target population to reproduce individuals who produce slave labour and blind consumption to exclusively & directly benefit the slave-system owners. [The Story of Your Enslavement - youtube]. Some believe that this system also serves a dualpurpose of allowing us to spiritually enslave ourselves through ignorance and karma: explaining through divine benevolence the surface-malevolence of demonic, occult activities and motives behind the elite's agenda(s). People are generally blind-sided when it comes to attacks made from subtle

yet pervasive scales and dimensions regarding not only government but even more fundamental forms of deception for more fundamental forces and functions. A deep socio-psychological paradigm reinforced, if not in some ways entirely engendered, by a schizophrenic political and bipolar economic system developes a randomly black &/or white - pointlessly for or against - kind of thought and decision processing. This situation serves to keep people distracted from subtle alternatives which are being pointlessly, though never helplessly, blocked out by the contingent form and presence of prefab presumptions. In other words, the edifices we're facing today with regards to politics, health, money, society, etc. are all virtual walls erected and sustained by organic faults located not just in human psychology and sociological phenomena but also in the dynamics of oligarchy and monolithic conspiracy. The wrong you have done is technically not y/our fault, but this will not save you from the consequences - karmic seeds of suffering - sown by any injustice(s) you've been fooled into comitting. A warning: the more you register the truths contained (everyw)herein, the more intense the karmic consequences will become should you continue treating others &/or yourself unaccordingly. Facing the truth is facing not only love, but y/our responsiblity as a direct participant in/as reality. This syllogism and its supporting fragments of quotes, commentary, articles, & essays will prove to you that you are literally one with everything & everyone - all reality and all potential. Every form of conscious-capacity is a pore within 'God's' cosmic continuum - an awareness-unit - and every single one acts the same as any other would act given their particularly and precisely conditioned situation: you are only as good as everyone and everything - omnipotent omnipresence (God; Holy Spirit).

"I believe that all culture must have arisen from cult. Origionally, all of the facets of our culture, whether they be in the arts or in the sciences, were the province of the shaman. The fact that in present times this magical power has degenerated to the level of cheap entertainment and manipulation is, I think, a tragedy. At the moment, the people who are using shamanism and magic to shape our culture are advertisers. Rather than trying to wake people up, their shamanism is used as an opiate to tranquilize people; to make people more manipulatable. Their magic box of television, and by their magic words, their jingles [pied piper], can cause everybody in the country to be thinking the same words and have the same banal thoughts all at exactly the same moment." - The Mindscape of Alan Moore (V for Vendetta)