Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Preface This is the sixth report on statistics obtained from the HCR database, and is the fourth since the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995 (RIDDOR 95) came into force offshore on 1st April 1996. The report presents data on hydrocarbon releases that have been reported for the period 1st October 1992 to 31st March 2001 inclusive. It should also be noted that the report is now part of a new (HID Statistics Report HSR) series to replace the OTO series, which is to be discontinued. Copies of this report can be obtained free of charge from:
Health and Safety Executive Hazardous Installations Directorate Central Division CD4C Data Management Room 201b Merton House Stanley Road Bootle Merseyside L20 3DL Tel: 0151 951 3099 Fax: 0151 951 4980 e-mail : HCR.Admin@hse.gsi.gov.uk
Copies of this report can also be downloaded free of charge from HSEs website at http://www.hse.gov.uk/hid/osd/hsr2001/contents.htm
OFFSHORE HYDROCARBON RELEASES STATISTICS, 2001 (FOR THE PERIOD 1-10-92 TO 31-3-01 INCLUSIVE)
CONTENTS
Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
1.0
INTRODUCTION
2.0
DATA CATEGORIES
3.0
STATISTICS
10
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11
Hydrocarbon type Reporting frequency Severity analysis Systems Equipment Drilling/Well Operations Installation type and location Ignitions Means of Detection Emergency actions Causation & Operating Mode
10 11 11 13 15 16 16 18 19 20 21
4.0
TABLES
23
5.0
FIGURES
95
Appendix 1 - OSD PROCESS INTEGRITY INITIATIVE Appendix 2 - SEVERITY CLASSIFICATION FEEDBACK QUESTIONNAIRE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An agreed target under the Governments Revitalising Health and Safety initiative is to reduce the number of major and significant releases by 50% over the next three years to March 2004, with 1999/2000 figures as baseline data. The total number of major releases in 2000/2001 shows a substantial decrease, down from 12 to 8 (33%) on last years figure, and the total number of significant releases has also decreased from 126 to 117 (7%) over the same period. The combined total for major and significant releases has therefore shown a reduction of 10% on the baseline target.
During the past year OSD undertook to investigate all hydrocarbon releases reported to OSD as part of a three-part Process Integrity initiative (see Appendix 1). This project was commissioned in the context of the sustained plateau in the number of hydrocarbon releases evidenced in the data up to 1999/2000, with a view to achieving a significant decrease. The results of these investigations are presented in OTO 2001 055 1, including an assessment of immediate and underlying causation factors, which supplements the information given in this statistics report.
Reported minor releases have increased by 50% over the past year, from 96 to 145, but there is good evidence that this increase is as a result of publicity related to the Process Integrity Initiative, and does not represent an increase in the number of minor releases occurring.
There were 13 reported ignitions in 2000/2001 none of which were major releases. Although there have been no ignited major releases since the launch of the HCR database, of the total 131 reported ignitions over the period 1 October 1992 to 31 March 2001, 40 of these (30.5%) have been significant releases (16 gas a nd 24 liquids).
Failure rates for individual systems and for individual items of equipment are published in alternate years, and the failure rate data in this report updates that provided in the 1999 Hydrocarbon Statistics Report, OTO 1999 079.
Offshore Technology Report OTO 2001 055, OSD Hydrocarbon Release Reduction Campaign Report on the hydrocarbon release incident investigation project 1/4/2000 to 31/3/2001.
1.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to provide the offshore industry with data from the Hydrocarbon Releases (HCR) Database for their use in connection with the preparation and revision of offshore safety cases, particularly in quantified risk assessment (QRA), as recommended by Lord Cullen in his report on the Piper Alpha disaster (Cullen Recommendation 39).
The HCR Database contains data on offshore hydrocarbon release incidents, supplementary details of which are reported voluntarily to the Health and Safety Executive, Hazardous Industries Directorate, Offshore Division (OSD) on form OIR/12. These data have been technically checked against the parent RIDDOR (OIR/9B) details, and then entered into the database by OSD since database startup on 1 October 1992.
This report, HSR 2001 002, covers the period 1 October 1992 to 31 March 2001. It is the sixth report on statistics obtained from the HCR Database, and is the fourth since the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995 (RIDDOR 95) came into force offshore on 1 April 1996.
Criteria for severity classification (i.e. major, significant, minor), first introduced in 1997, were refined in 1999 to include release rates (see Appendix 2). The limited accuracy of the sys tems and equipment population data estimates, and the voluntary nature of the information supplied on form OIR/12, should all be taken into consideration when drawing conclusions from the statistics contained in this report.
The main thrust of this report is to advise industry of the bare statistics. Nevertheless, some discussion has been added where appropriate. This report also contains statistics on detection modes, emergency actions, and causation, but offers no root cause analysis at this stage. Howe ver, in view of the reporting plateau evidenced in data up to 1999/2000, and the absence of any downward trend to that time, OSD began a 3-part Process Integrity initiative (see Appendix 1) aimed at raising industry awareness to the problem and identifying their root causes, with a view to achieving a significant break through in the existing plateau. 7
An agreed target under the Governments Revitalising Health and Safety initiative is to reduce the number of major and significant releases by 50% by March 2004.
Detailed failure rate tables are published in alternate years, and the latest versions of (a) System Failure Rates & Severity / Hole Size Distribution; and (b) Equipment Failure Rates & Severity / Hole Size Distribution are included in this report. The failure rate data in this report therefore updates that provided in the 1999 Hydrocarbon Statistics Report, OTO 1999 079.
Feedback on the contents of this statistics report for 2001 would be appreciated. This can be provided by completing the single page questionnaire form at the back of the report and returning it to HSE Hazardous Installations Directorate, at the address indicated on the form.
2.
DATA CATEGORIES
This section describes the categories of data available from the HCR Database, statistics from which are contained in section 3.0.
Section 4.0 contains the data tables referred to in the report, all of which are listed in a separate section 4.0 index.
Section 5.0 contains the figures referred to in the report, all of which are listed in a separate section 5.0 index.
The statistics, tables, and figures show the breakdown of data using the following sort categories: v Type of hydrocarbon, viz. liquids (oil/condensate/non-process 2), gas, or 2-phase v Severity of release, i.e. major, significant, or minor (Appendix 2) v Type of installation, viz. fixed (including Floating Production Systems [FPS]), mobile or subsea v Location of installation on the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) viz. Northern (above 590 Latitude), Central (560 to 590 Latitude) or Southern area (below 560 Latitude, including Irish Sea and English Channel) v Year of occurrence (12 month periods from 1 April to 31 March unless noted otherwise)
Each release has a single system type allocated to it and an individual equipment type within that system (well type and/or well operation for drilling activities). Most tables show the number of releases occurring, sorted by one or more of the above categories.
Statistics for other reported features such as ignitions, mode of detection, emergency actions taken, causation factors etc., are also given in Section 3.0.
3.
STATISTICS
A total of 2071 hydrocarbon release incident reports have been received, checked and input during the 8 year period since the start-up of the Hydrocarbon Releases (HCR) Database on 1 October 1992, up to 31 March 2001 inclusive.
The following subsections comprise detailed discussion of the statistics shown in the tables and figures in sections 4.0 and 5.0 respectively.
Caution should be exercised when interpreting these statistics, in view of the limited accuracy of population data, the voluntary nature of the information supplied on form OIR/12, and the small number of releases involved in some cases. 3.1 Hydrocarbon type
Figure 1, in section 5.0, shows the breakdown of reported releases by hydrocarbon type. It can be seen from this pie-chart that gas releases constituted, by far, the largest proportion of releases reported, i.e. 1150 out of 2071 (55.5%). The other types, ranked in decreasing order, were oil 347 (16.8%), non-process 239 (11.5%), 2-phase 184 (8.9%) and condensate 151 (7.3%).
The higher proportion of gas releases may have arisen from the fact that almost all offshore installations handle gas, but only 37% of installations handle hydrocarbon production liquids (see also section 3.7 - Installations). Other contributing factors to the higher incidence of gas releases could be that gas is usually subjected to higher pressures and temperatures than other forms of hydrocarbon, hence there are greater challenges associated with gas containment.
10
3.2
Reporting frequency
Figure 2, in section 5.0, shows the monthly reporting frequencies since October 1992 up to the end of March 2001. Major milestones which occurred during the reporting period are also listed.
Reporting reached a peak of 325 in 1994/1995, probably attributable to more detailed reporting following the issue of the OIR/12 form in August, 1992, and to comprehensive guidance 3 in August, 1993. There then fo llowed a substantial drop down to 212 in 1995/96, ostensibly due to the safety case regime and improved safety management systems taking effect. Thereafter, the number of incidents seemed to have reached a plateau with the annual totals for the following years being 226 (1996/1997), 218 ( 997/1998), 234 (1998/1999) and 234 (1999/2000), 1 and the monthly reporting rate fluctuated between 18 to 20 in the same period.
Although the number of major and significant releases has decreased to 125 (from 138 in 1999/2000) the total number of reported releases has increased to 270 for 2000/2001, reflecting a marked increase in the number of minor releases, with the monthly average increasing to 22.5. The increase in the number of minor releases reported has been attributed to the effects of raised awareness during the investigation phase of the Process Integrity initiative, which was carried out during 2000/2001. 3.3 Severity analysis
3.3.1 All releases All releases have been classified according to agreed severity criteria. (See Appendix 2). Table 4 in Section 4.0 shows that, of the 2071 reported releases to 31 March 2001, 143 were classified major (6.9% of all leaks), 1173 were significant releases (56.6%) and the remaining 755 were minor (36.5%).
3
Hydrocarbon Releases OTO 96 956, is available free on request from HSE on tel :0151-951-3099 or fax: 0151-951-3098 or e-mail: HCR.Admin@hse.gsi.gov.uk or downloaded free from the HSE website: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/frameset/oto/1996/index.htm
11
Figure 3 in section 5.0 shows the reporting patterns by year for major, significant and minor releases in both tabular and line graph form. The overall number of major releases in 2000/2001 decreased from last years figures (down from 12 to 8), and the number of significant releases also decreased (from 126 to 117) over the same period. In contrast, the overall number of minor 4 releases reported in 2000/2001 increased in comparison with last year's figure (up from 96 to 145).
3.3.2 Gas releases Figure 4 in section 5.0 shows the reporting patterns by year for major, significant and minor gas releases in both tabular and line graph form. The upward trend in the annual number of reported gas releases continued in 2000/2001, with a further increase of 3.6% over the previous year (up from 136 to 141). However, the number of major gas releases went down for the first time since the low of 6 in 1997/98 having decreased to 7 in 2000/2001 from 11 in 1999/2000. Similarly, significant gas releases also dropped from 79 to 74 in the same period. The combined number of major and significant gas releases has decreased from 90 in 1999/2000 to 81 in 2000/2001. This is the lowest full-year figure for combined major and significant releases since the start-up of the HCR database. However, the number of minor gas releases has shown a year in year increase since 1995/1996, again going up from 46 to 60 in the past year.
3.3.3 Liquid releases Figure 5 in section 5.0 shows the reporting patterns by year for major, significant and minor liquid releases in both tabular and line graph form. It can be seen from these that the annual numbers of reported liquid releases (i.e. oil, condensate and nonprocess combined) have fluctuated over the years since database start-up, with no discernible trend. The number of minor releases has however increased from 47 in 1999/2000 to 79 in 2000/2001, reflecting the overall increase in minor releases over this period.
It is important to note that reports of minor releases only cover those reportable under RIDDOR
definitions which are based on the potential for fire/explosion. It should also be noted that all ignitions offshore are reportable, however minor.
12
3.3.4 2-phase releases Figure 6 in section 5.0 shows the reporting patterns by year for major, significant and minor 2-phase releases in both tabular and line graph form. From these, it can be seen that the numbers of reported 2-phase releases have also fluctuated over the years since database start-up. As with liquid releases, there is no discernible trend. 3.4 Systems
3.4.1 Failure rates and severity / hole size distribution Table 1 in section 4.0 gives details of failure rates and severity / hole size distributions for all system types (in alphabetical order) contained in the database, whether any releases were reported for the system type or not. It should also be noted that Drilling in this case only involves those releases from permanent drilling equipment, and does not include those releases related to drilling activities and well operations such as workover. Information on severity and hole size distribution for
drilling and well operations is given in section 3.6 of this report, and in Table 3 below.
(a) Failure Rates: The population in system years is given in the table (SYSYEARS=summation of the total y ears of that type of system that has been on each installation), together with the number of releases reported against that system type (LEAK) for each year since the start-up of the database in O ctober 1992. The failure rate for any system is given by the total leaks divided by the total system years, and is expressed as a rate per system year. If no releases were reported, then a rate has not been calculated (see notes on table). It is recognized that there are methods of estimating failure rates, even given a zero occurrence, but it is left to the practitioner to select the method appropriate to the scenario under analysis.
(b) Severity Distribution: The total number of releases for each system has been broken down into the three classes of severity i.e. major, significant or minor (see Appendix 2 for details), and a fractional distribution has been calculated for each.
13
(c) Hole Size Distribution The total number of leaks for each system has been broken down into seven hole size categories, together w the fractional distribution for each band or range of ith hole size. It should be noted that hole size is not considered applicable to some scenarios involving open topped vessels (e.g. shale shakers, wemco units, tilted plate separators, etc.), and certain other scenarios involving liquid carry-over, so these have been assigned to a separate category (N/A), in addition to the six ranges shown. IMPORTANT: The severity distribution may be used to find the proportion of major, significant or minor releases within any system failure rate. Similarly, the hole size distribution may be used to determine the proportion of releases within each hole size band. It is very important to note, however, that only one of these distributions should be used at any one time, and that it is incorrect to apply both distributions together on failure rates. For example, the proportion of hole size <10mm for major releases can NOT be found by multiplying the two relevant factors together.
3.4.2 Systems : highest 15 failure rates The barchart in figure 7, section 5.0, shows the failure rates in leaks per system year for the highest ranked 15 release rates out of a total of 52 system types.
The system with the highest failure rate is gas compression with a failure rate of 3.00 x 10-1 leaks per system year. High operating temperatures and pressures, vibration, and the consequent effects of these on vulnerable equipment items such as seals, instruments, and small bore pipework items etc. are considered to be major contributors to the frequency of hydrocarbon releases from this system type, and these factors have been taken into account in the current Process Integrity initiative (Appendix 1). The next highest system failure rate was for subsea gas injection wells (1.67 x 10-1 leaks per system year). Caution should however be exercised when interpreting this rate, as the calculation is based on a very small equipment population.
14
The next highest ranking systems were oil export (1.44 x 10-1 leaks per system year), and fuel gas (1.39 x 10-1 leaks per system year). 3.5 Equipment
3.5.1 Failure rates and severity / hole size distribution Table 2 in section 4.0 portrays equipment failure rates, severity and hole size distributions in similar fashion to those described for systems, and so it is important to read sections 3.4.1 (a), (b), (c) above in relation to equipment items also. Again, it is very important to note that only one of the distributions should be used at any one time, and that it is incorrect to apply both distributions together on any failure rates.
The relationship between systems and individual items of equipment in them has been omitted due to the relatively small number of releases reported compared to the large number of system / equipment type combinations involved.
3.5.2 Equipment : highest 15 failure rates The barchart in figure 8, section 5.0, shows the failure rates in leaks per equipment year for the highest ranked 15 release rates out of a total of 119 equipment types.
The major equipment items with the highest failure rates are dual fuel turbines at 7.24 x 10-2 leaks per equipment year, and reciprocating compressors at 6.50 x 10-2 leaks per equipment year. These indicate strong links with the high gas
It should be noted that the equipment items having the highest numbers of reported leaks were instruments (316 total), and pipework items such as valves, flanges and piping. Their respective population numbers are also very large and thus their respective failure rates in the rankings are reduced. However, the problems (with
15
small bore tubing in particular) have been recognised and guidelines 5 have been produced for addressing loss of containment, etc. 3.6 Drilling/Well Operations activities versus release type and severity
3.6.1 Severity / hole size distribution Table 3 in section 4.0 portrays Drilling and Well Operations activities due to the different population data requirements i.e. per activity per rig year, rather than per system year or equipment year. Drilling activities are sorted by well type i.e.
exploration, appraisal, development, completion, etc. Well operations are sorted by operation type i.e. wireline, coiled tubing, etc. as shown. It should be noted that, due to the lack of suitable population data, failure rates cannot be provided for drilling / well operations activities. Therefore, only severity and hole size distributions are shown in the table. Again, it is very important to note that only one of the distributions should be used at anyone time, and that it is incorrect to apply both distributions together.
3.7
Table 5 in section 4.0 summarises the breakdown of all reported releases by hydrocarbon type versus installation type, i.e. fixed which includes floating production systems (FPS), mobile including both drilling and accommodation units, and subsea. Each installation also has an associated location in either the Northern (above 590 Latitude North), Central (560 to 590 Latitude North), or Southern (below 560 Latitude North, including Irish Sea and English Channel) areas of UKCS. The total current population and the estimated number of installation years (as at 31 March 2001) is also given for each installation type on the UKCS by area.
Guidelines for the Management, Design, Installation and Maintenance of Small Bore Tubing Systems. ISBN 0 85293 275 8. Published in 2000 by the Institute of Petroleum.
16
3.7.1 Installation type The breakdown by installation type showed that fixed installations were responsible for 1994 (96.3%) of releases reported. In contrast, only 77 releases (3.7%) were reported by mobile drilling and accommodation installations. These proportions are not considered unusual, because there is constant exposure to hydrocarbons on fixed installations whereas the exposure on mobile installations is intermittent.
3.7.2 Fixed installation failure rates Failure rates have been calculated in terms of leaks per installation year, for each type of installation, by dividing the total number of leaks for that type by the total number of installation years.
Floating Production Systems (including FPSO and FSU) had the highest overall leak rate of 2.8 leaks per installation year, with 5.9% major releases. Fixed attended installations in the Northern North Sea had the next highest leak rate of 2.5 leaks per installation year, with 5.2% of these being major releases. Central fxed attended i installations were next, with 2.3 leaks per installation year, with 5.2% major releases. Southern fixed attended insta llations had a leak rate of 0.4 leaks per installation year, with 8.7% major, and Southern normally unattended installations (NUI) leak rate was 0.2 leaks per installation year, with 20.5% major releases.
The production equipment on the larger attended oil production platforms in the Northern and Central areas is more complex and subject to much greater fluctuation of operating parameters than on the simpler and smaller gas production platforms in the Southern area. It is reasonably foreseeable, therefore, that there may be a greater propensity for hydrocarbon releases of all types on the larger installations. In view of the smaller numbers of the larger installations, it is also expected that failure rates would be much greater than those in the Southern Sector.
3.7.3 Mobile installation failure rates Using the population data held in the HCR database, leak rates have been calculated in terms of leaks per installation year, for each type of mobile installation. However, in the absence of accurate rig years data, it was necessary to assume that each unit was present on the UKCS for the entire period since their arrival, and so 17
these leak rates must be considered very approximate (and tending toward best case) as a result.
Combining Southern and Central release figures gave an overall leak rate for jack-up mobile drilling and accommodation units of 0.4 leaks per installation year, with 7.3% major releases. Northern and Central release figures combined gave an overall leak rate for semi-submersible mobile drilling and accommodation units of 0.3 leaks per installation year, with 19.4% major releases. 3.8 Ignitions
3.8.1 Ignition summary Table 6, section 4.0, summarises the numbers of ignitions for each year versus the number of releases for each type of hydrocarbon. It is important to note that the percentages shown are ignition rates (i.e. percentage of releases ignited) and NOT ignition probabilities (i.e. the likelihood of a particular release igniting).
There was a grand total of 131 reported ignitions (i.e. 6.3% of all releases) over the 8 year period, none of which were major.
There were 40 gas ignitions (30.5% of all ignitions), of which 16 were classed as significant releases (ignition rate 2.2%), and 24 as minor (ignition rate 7.7%). There were no major ignited gas releases.
There were 91 liquid ignitions (69.5% of all ignitions) of which 24 were classed as significant releases (ignition rate 8.0%), and 67 as minor (ignition rate 15.9%). There were no major ignited liquids releases.
The higher ignition rates in the case of minor releases, and liquids releases in particular, is considered to be due to the fact that reports of unignited minor releases cover only those reportable under RIDDOR definitions based on the potential for fire/explosion, but that ALL ignitions are reportable no matter how minor. 18
3.8.2 Ignition details Table 7, section 4.0, comprises three parts, which contain full details of every ignition reported in the 8 years to 31 March 2001.
The three parts cover the following details : (a) Release parameters (b) Mode of operation/ignition sources/ignition sequences, and (c) Detection mode/emergency actions taken.
Each individual record has a unique number and so it is possible to read all three parts for one ignition incident to obtain the full picture. The purpose of this report is to provide statistics only, so any analysis of ignitions has been excluded here. 3.9 Means of detection
3.9.1 Summary Table 8 in section 4.0, summarises the modes of detection employed during an incident versus the type of hydrocarbon and severity of release. The modes comprise heat, smoke, flame, gas and other. It should be noted that more than one means of detection may be reported for any one release, and so the totals for each column may be more than the total number of releases reported.
There were 2212 detection modes connected with the total 2071 reported releases, more than one mode being effective on some releases. Gas detectors detected 41.8% of all releases (58.7% of gas releases), and the remaining releases were mainly detected by means other tha n equipment designed for the purpose (see 3.9.2 below).
3.9.2 Other detection modes A breakdown of the other category which includes detection by visual means, by sound, by smell etc., is shown in table 9, section 4.0. It is considered important to have a separate table for these, since they have made a substantial contribution to the overall detection of offshore releases. 19
Of the total 2212 modes, 1267 (57.3% of modes) involved means of detection other than by dedicated detection systems. Of these 1267 other means of detection 975 (77%) were visually detected, of which 49 (5% of visual detection) involved major releases, 521 (53% of visual detection) involved significant releases, and 405 (42%) minor releases.
Specific detection details for all reported ignitions are included in table 7 (c).
3.10
Table 10, section 4.0, shows a breakdown of the various types of emergency actions taken against the types and severity of releases involved. These actions include either automatic or manual initiation of shutdown, blowdown, deluge, and/or CO2/Halon systems, plus whether any musters and/or any other emergency actions were carried out.
Nearly two-thirds of releases (1355) required shutdown action (404 automatic, 951 manual), of which 103 (7.6% of shutdowns) were for major releases. Blowdown operated on 629 (255 auto, 374 manual = 30.4% of all releases) of which 64 (10.2% of blowdowns) were for major releases.
There were 560 musters (520 at stations, 40 at lifeboats = 27.0% of all releases), 58 of which (10.4% of musters) were for major releases.
In contrast, deluge only operated on 41 releases (2.0% of all releases), of which 11 (26.8% of deluge) were for major releases, and only 52 (2.5% of all releases) involved the use of CO2/Halon systems, of which only 1 was for a major release. There were a total of 62 releases (5 major, 35 significant, 22 minor) where no reported emergency actions were taken. This represents 3.0% of all major releases, 3.0% of significant releases, and 2.9% of minor releases. This indicates that, regardless of severity, 97.0% of all reported releases involved some sort of
20
emergency action. Specific emergency actions taken for all ignitions reported to 31 March 2001 are included in table 7(c). 3.11 Causation & operating mode versus release type & severity
Table 11, section 4.0, summarises the breakdown of all types of release into the four main causation categories (i.e. design, equipment, operational and/or procedural faults) plus details of the mode of operation in the area at the time of the incident. It should be noted that more than one category may be involved in any one incident, and so caution should be exercised when interpreting the figures shown.
The most frequently reported factor was equipment fault at 1362 (65.8% of incidents). Operational faults were next with 1116 (53.9% of incidents), procedural faults 588 (28.4% of incidents), and design faults 321 (15.5% of incidents).
The proportion of releases occurring during normal production was 48.8% compared to that during intervention type activities such as start-up / reinstatement (18.1%), drilling / workover (9.5%), and maintenance / construction (9.7%). These proportions have generally been maintained throughout each year since database start-up in October 1992.
The causation factor involved in most incidents was mechanical failure which occurred on 920 occasions (44.4% of all incidents), followed by improper operation that occurred on 495 occasions (23.9% of all incidents).
A detailed analysis of the causation factors involved in the investigation phase of the Process integrity Initiative (see Appendix 1) is contained in OTO 2001 055.
21
22
4.0
Table 1.
2.
Equipment failure rates and severity / hole size distribution (24 pages)
3.
4.
Severity analysis
5.
Installation type/location versus release type & severity (2 pages incl. notes) Ignitions : summary
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
23
24
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different seve rities YEAR
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTI ON : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .
Previous 1999/00 BLOWDOWN 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 DRAINS, CLOSED, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 DRAINS, OPEN, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 DRILLING 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 EXPORT, CONDENSATE, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 EXPORT, GAS, 2000/01 Total:
1137 193 196 1526 1317 222 225 1764 1436 248 252 1936
863 138 138 1139 113 17 18 148 1225 203 206 1634
25
YEAR
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different seve rities
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTI ON : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .
Previous 1999/00 EXPORT, OIL, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 FLARE, HP, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 FLARE, LP, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 FLOWLINES, GAS 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 FLOWLINES, OIL 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 FLOWLINES, OTHER, (CONDENSATE, METHANOL ETC) 2000/01 Total:
4 0 0 4 0.03 2 1 0 3 0.09
753 135 137 1025 6011 979 989 7979 5643 992 992 7627
1 0 0 1 0.33
26
YEAR
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different seve rities
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTI ON : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .
Previous 1999/00 GAS COMPRESSION. 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 IMPORT, CONDENSATE 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 IMPORT, GAS, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 IMPORT, OIL, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 MANIFOLD, GAS 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 MANIFOLD, OIL 2000/01 Total:
16 2 1 19 0.06
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.09 1 0 0 1 0.04
3 0 2 5 0.23 3 0 0 3 0.09
27
YEAR
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different seve rities
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTI ON : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .
Previous 1999/00 MANIFOLD, OTHER, (CONDENSATE, METHANOL ETC) 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 METERING, CONDENSATE, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 METERING, GAS, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 METERING, OIL, 2000 Total: Previous 1999/00 PROCESSING, GAS, CHEMICAL INJECTION 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 PROCESSING, GAS, DEHYDRATION 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00
1087 186 188 1461 640 117 117 874 707 125 126 958
571 98 99 768
2 1 0 3 0.05
28
YEAR
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different seve rities
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTI ON : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .
Previous PROCESSING, GAS, LPG/ CONDENSATE 1999/00 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 PROCESSING, GAS, METHANOL (INJECTI ON) 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 PROCESSING, GAS, PROD . WATER TREATMENT. 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 PROCESSING, GAS, SOUR (H2S/CO2) TREATMENT. 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 PROCESSING, OIL, CHEMICAL INJECTION 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 PROCESSING, OIL, METHANOL (INJECTION) 2000/01 Total:
542 90 92 724
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00
29
YEAR
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different seve rities
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTI ON : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .
250 48 48 346
1 0 0 1 0.03 2 0 0 2 0.04
Previous 1999/00 PROCESSING, OIL, PROD. WATER TREATMENT, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 SEPARATION, GAS PRODUCTION 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 SEPARATION, GAS TEST 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 SEPARATION, OIL PRODUCTION 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 SEPARATION, OIL TEST 2000/01 Total:
471 84 85 640
865 131 134 1130 425 65 66 556 662 116 116 894
435 80 80 595
5 0 0 5 0.14
30
YEAR
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different seve rities
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTI ON : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .
Previous 1999/00 UTILITIES, GAS, FUEL GAS, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 UTILITIES, GAS, POWER GEN. TURBINES. 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 UTILITIES, OIL, DIESEL. 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 UTILITIES, OIL, HEAT TRANSFER OIL 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 UTILITIES, OIL, HELI -FUEL / JET FUEL 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 UTILITIES, OIL, POWER GEN. TURBINES. 2000/01 Total:
7 1 0 8 0.06
1580 269 272 2121 2287 386 390 3063 316 63 64 443
0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 1 1 0.07
31
YEAR
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different seve rities
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTI ON : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .
Previous 1999/00 VENT, HP, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 VENT, LP, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 WELL CONTROL 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 WELL, GAS INJECTION, SUBSEA 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 WELL, GAS INJECTION, SURFACE 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 WELL, GAS PRODUCTION, SUBSEA 2000/01 Total:
3 0 0 3 0.12 2 0 0 2 0.13
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00
190 31 31 252
1 0 0 1 0.50
32
YEAR
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different seve rities
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTI ON : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .
Previous 1999/00 WELL, GAS PRODUCTION, SURFACE 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 WELL, OIL PRODUCTION, SUBSEA, 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 WELL, OIL PRODUCTION, SURFACE 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 WELL, OTHER, SUBSEA 2000/01 Total: Previous 1999/00 WELL, OTHER, SURFACE 2000/01 Total:
2 0 0 2 0.07
1003 220 220 1443 4724 782 782 6288 110 17 17 144
1 0 0 1 0.06 5 0 0 5 0.10 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
33
34
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
266 39 39 344
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 Note 2
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 0.05
235 43 45 323
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0.00
35
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
0 0 0 0 0.00
1 0 0 1 5.27E-04
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 2 0.04
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.00
70 11 13 94
0 0 0 0 0.00
36
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
0 0 0 0 0.00
25 5 4 34 3.64E-03
0 0 0 0 0.00
2 0 0 2 0.02
7 1 0 8 0.07
4 1 1 6 0.22
37
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
2 0 0 2 0.17
9 2 1 12 4.94E-03
8 0 1 9 0.75 7 0 4 2.92E-03 11 0.85 14 1 2 1.03E-02 17 0.85 187 32 32 5.85E-04 251 0.79 0 0 0 6.83E-04 0 0.00
1 0 0 1 0.08
0 0 0 0 0.00
26 4 0 30 0.09
0 0 0 0 0.00
38
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
0 0 0 0 0.00
3 0 0 3 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1.00 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 4 1.12E-03
0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 2 0.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Previous 1999/00 PIG LAUNCHERS, 12" < D < = 16" 2000/01 Total:
167 28 28 223
0 0 0 0 0
Previous 1999/00 PIG LAUNCHERS, 8" < D < = 12" 2000/01 Total:
199 32 33 264
0 0 0 0 0.00
95 14 14 123
0 0 0 0 0
39
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
2 0 0 2 0.22
7 0 2 9 8.47E-03
Previous 1999/00 PIG RECEIVERS, 12" < D < = 16" 2000/01 Total:
185 27 27 239
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 PIG RECEIVERS, 8" < D < = 12" 2000/01 Total:
139 21 22 182
0 0 0 0 0.00
149 22 22 193
0 0 0 0 0
446 79 79 604
0 0 0 0 0.00
40
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
Previous 1999/00 PIPELINES, FLEXIBLE, 12" < D < = 16" 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.50
2 0 0 2 4.71E-04
Previous 1999/00 PIPELINES, FLEXIBLE, 4" < D < = 8" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 PIPELINES, FLEXIBLE, 8" < D < = 12" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 2 0.67
0 0 0 0 0
41
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
Previous 1999/00 PIPELINES, STEEL, 12" < D < = 16" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 Note 2
Previous 1999/00 PIPELINES, STEEL, 4" < D < = 8" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 PIPELINES, STEEL, 8" < D < = 12" 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.50
2 0 0 2 0.40
0 0 0 0 0.00
42
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
Previous 1999/00 PIPING, FLEXIBLE, 3" < D < = 11" 2000/01 Total:
2 2 1 5 0.28
10 5 3 18 1.87E-04
6 1 3 10 0.56 14 6 4 9.11E-04 24 0.59 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 71 7 21 5.87E-05 99 0.75 141 30 44 2.00E-04 215 0.79
4 0 0 4 0.10
0 0 0 0 0
Previous 1999/00 PIPING, STEEL, 3" < D < = 11" 2000/01 Total:
9 1 0 10 0.08
5 2 1 8 0.03
43
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
4 0 0 4 0.11
26 3 7 36 5.49E-05
23 4 4 31
0 0 0 0 0
206 30 30 266
0 0 0 0 0.00
1 0 0 1 0.04
140 21 22 183
0 0 0 0 0.00
44
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
221 32 32 285
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0.56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.40
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.60
0 0 0 0 Note 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.20
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.40
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 5 0.56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.40
1 0 0 1 0.11
70 17 17 104
0 0 0 0 0
263 50 51 364
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.00
45
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
0 0 0 0 0.00
5 0 3 8 5.49E-03
33 6 6 45
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0.00
86 14 14 114
0 0 0 0 0
46
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
0 0 0 0 0.00
32 3 5 40 6.04E-03
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0.00
562 99 99 760
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 2 2
0 0 0 0 0
47
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
Previous 1999/00 RISERS, FLEXIBLE, 12" < D < =16" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 Note 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
Previous 1999/00 RISERS, FLEXIBLE, 4" < D < = 8" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 RISERS, FLEXIBLE, 8" < D < = 12" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0
48
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
Previous 1999/00 RISERS, STEEL, 12" < D < = 16" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
1 0 0 1 1.47E-05
Previous 1999/00 RISERS, STEEL, 4" < D < = 8" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 RISERS, STEEL, 8" < D < = 12" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 0.33
49
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
332 55 55 442
1 0 1 2 0.06
24 4 4 32 7.24E-02
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, BLOCK, 3" < D < = 11" 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.07
1 0 0 1 0.05
0 0 0 0 0.00
50
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, BLOWDOWN, 3" < D < = 11" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
1 0 0 1 2.91E-04
0 0 0 0 0.00
210 32 32 274
0 0 0 0 0
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, CHOKE, 3" < D < = 11" 2000/01 Total:
3 0 0 3 0.25
0 0 0 0 0.00
51
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
71 10 10 91
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 Note 2
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, CONTROL, 3" < D < = 11" 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.05
1 0 0 1 0.04
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, ESDV, 3" < D < = 11" 2000/01 Total:
1 1 0 2 0.15
52
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
1 0 0 1 0.25
3 1 0 4 1.98E-04
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L ESDV, 12" < D < = 16" 2000/01 Total:
528 83 83 694
1 0 0 1 1.00
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L ESDV, 4" < D < = 8" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L ESDV, 8" < D < = 12" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
53
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L ESDV, D < = 4" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
2 0 0 2 1.35E-03
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L ESDV, D > 16" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L SSIV ASSY, 4" < D < = 8" 2000/01 Total:
608 17 17 642
0 0 0 0 0
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L SSIV ASSY, 12" < D < = 16" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L SSIV ASSY, 8" < D < = 12" 2000/01 Total:
248 39 39 326
0 0 0 0 0
54
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L SSIV ASSY, D < = 4" 2000/01 Total:
285 43 43 371
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 12 0.86 9 6 0 15 0.56 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.14 8 2 1 11 0.41 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 Note 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.14 5 3 0 8 0.30 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.07 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.07 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L SSIV ASSY, D > 16" 2000/01 Total:
179 27 29 235
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.00
1 0 0 1 0.04
239 42 42 323
0 0 0 0 0
55
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
0 0 0 0 0.00
17 2 0 19 8.25E-05
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, MANUAL, BLOCK, 3" < D < = 11" 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.03
4 0 2 6 0.13
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, MANUAL, CHECK, 3" < D < = 11" 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.17
56
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
1 0 0 1 0.20
4 1 0 5 1.30E-04
1 0 0 1 0.17
Previous 1999/00 VALVE, MANUAL, CHOKE, 3" < D < = 11" 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.20
Prev ious 1999/00 VALVE, MANUAL, CHOKE, D < = 3" 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
86 12 12 110
0 0 0 0 0
57
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
Previous 1999/00 WELLHEADS, 5000 psi < P < = 10000 psi (690 bar) 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.33
2 1 0 3 9.92E-04
Previous 1999/00 WELLHEADS, P > 10000 psi (690 bar) 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0
Previous 1999/00 WELLHEADS, P < = 5000 psi (345 bar) 2000/01 Total:
8997 32 45 9074
3 0 0 3 0.11
Previous 1999/00 XMAS TREES, 5000 psi < P < = 10000 psi (690 bar) 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.09
Previous 1999/00 XMAS TREES, P < = 5000 psi (345 bar) 2000/01 Total:
4 0 0 4 0.07
58
Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.
Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.
CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.
Previous 1999/00 XMAS TREES, P > 10000 psi (690 bar) 2000/01 Total:
202 32 45 279
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 1 1 2 0.50
0 1 1 2 0.50
0 2 2 4 1.43E-02
0 2 2 4 1.00
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0.00
59
60
NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc. 4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.
CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING EXPLORATION, OIL WELL, 100 - 700 METRES 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING, APPRAISAL, OIL WELL, <100 METRES 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.50
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING, COMPLETION, GAS WELL, 100 - 700 METRES 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING, COMPLETION, GAS WELL, <100 METRES 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.50
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING, COMPLETION, OIL WELL, 100 - 700 METRES 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
61
NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc. 4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.
CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING, COMPLETION, OIL WELL, <100 METRES 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.50
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING, DEVELOPMENT, GAS WELL, <100 METRES 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING, DEVELOPMENT, GAS WELL, 100 - 700 METRES 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING, DEVELOPMENT, OIL WELL, 100 - 700 METRES 2000/01 Total:
2 0 0 2 0.12
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING, DEVELOPMENT, OIL WELL, <100 METRES 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.33
62
NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc. 4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.
CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING, EXPLORATION, GAS WELL, <100 METRES 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 DRILLING, EXPLORATION, GAS WELL, 100-700 METRES 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 1.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, ABANDONMENT, GAS WELL, WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, ABANDONMENT, OIL WELL, WITH TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, ABANDONMENT, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
63
NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc. 4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.
CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, COILED TUBING, GAS WELL, WITH TREE 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.50
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, COILED TUBING, GAS WELL, WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, COILED TUBING, OIL WELL, WITH TREE 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.07
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, COILED TUBING, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, OTHER, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
64
NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc. 4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.
CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, RE-COMPLETION, GAS WELL, WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 1.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, RE-COMPLETION, OIL WELL, WITH TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, RE-COMPLETION, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, SNUBBING, GAS WELL WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, SNUBBING, OIL WELL WITH TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
65
NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc. 4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.
CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, WELL TEST, GAS WELL WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, WELL TEST, GAS WELL, WITH TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, WELL TEST, OIL WELL, WITH TREE 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.13
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, WELL TEST, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 1 1 0.11
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, WIRELINE, GAS WELL, WITH TREE 2000/01 Total:
1 0 0 1 0.11
66
NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc. 4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.
Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.
CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, WIRELINE, GAS WELL, WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, WIRELINE, OIL WELL, WITH TR EE 2000/01 Total:
1 0 1 2 0.07
Previous 1999/00 WELL OPS, WIRELINE, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE 2000/01 Total:
0 0 0 0 0.00
67
MAJOR
SIGNIFICANT
MINOR
ALL
68
3.
4. 5.
6.
7. 8.
9.
69
Maj 21 0 27 0 18 19 10 1 96 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 99
70
DETAILS
IGNITIONS RELEASES (3) % IGNITIONS RELEASES (3) % IGNITIONS RELEASES (3) % IGNITIONS RELEASES (3) % IGNITIONS RELEASES (3) % IGNITIONS RELEASES (3) % IGNITIONS RELEASES (3) % IGNITIONS RELEASES (3) % IGNITIONS RELEASES (3) % IGNITIONS RELEASES (3) %
1993/94
1994/95
1995/96
1996/97
1997/98
1998/99
1999/00
2000/01
ALL YEARS
HYDROCARBON TYPE & SEVERITY LIQUIDS GAS 2-PHASE Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 12 9 9 34 10 2 4 0 0 8.3 22.2 0 2.9 0 0 0 0 0 7 10 0 4 5 0 0 0 4 32 53 16 96 41 4 22 3 0 21.9 18.9 0 4.2 12.2 0 0 0 0 5 15 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 53 56 16 132 51 3 9 4 0 9.4 26.8 0 0.8 5.9 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 30 34 12 86 24 6 18 0 0 3.3 17.6 0 1.2 4.2 0 0 0 0 4 10 0 2 2 0 0 0 3 40 54 14 74 20 2 15 4 0 10 18.5 0 2.7 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 1 40 37 6 79 29 6 20 0 0 0 8.1 0 3.8 10.3 0 0 0 0 3 9 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 31 53 8 85 31 5 18 1 0 9.7 17 0 3.5 9.7 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 35 47 11 79 46 1 12 3 0 5.7 8.5 0 0 8.7 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 28 79 7 74 60 1 15 6 0 3.6 10.1 0 1.4 5.0 0 0 0 0 24 67 0 16 24 0 0 0 14 301 422 99 739 312 30 133 21 0 8.0 15.9 0 2.2 7.7 0 0 0
TOTAL
4 81 4.9 26 271 9.6 24 325 7.4 9 212 4.2 18 226 8 9 218 4.1 18 234 7.7 10 234 4.3 13 270 4.8 131 2071 6.3
Notes: (1) (2) (3) Total numbers in Hydrocarbon releases database for the period 01-10-92 TO 31-03-01 6 months period from 01-10-92 to 31-03-93 No. of Ignitions No. of Releases = % Ignited NB: This is NOT an Ignition probability Full details of all Ignitions are given in Tables 7 a, b, and c.
(4)
71
72
2.
3.
73
74
Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Oil Condensate Condensate Gas Gas Gas Gas Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Gas
75
Non Process Non Process Non Non Non Non Process Process Process Process
Non Process Non Process Oil Condensate Condensate Gas Gas Gas Gas Non Process Non Process Non Process Gas Gas Gas Gas Gas Gas
76
77
78
1 1 1 1
Total = 4 1993/94
5 6 7 8 9
Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process
1 1 1 1 1
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Oil Oil Condensate Condensate Gas
Glycol Glycol Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Heat Trans Oil Lub Oil
Significant Significant Minor Minor Minor Significant Significant Minor Significant Minor Minor Minor Minor
Normal Production Normal Production Reinstatement Reinstatement Reinstatement Maintenance Cold Work Testing Maintenance Cold Work Start-up Maintenance Cold Work Start-up Construction Hot Work Maintenance Hot Work
2 1 1
1 1 4800 1 1 180 1 1 1 1 1 1
23
Gas
Minor
Inspection
79
1 1
39 40 41 42
1 1 2
43 44 45 46 47
Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process
Testing Normal Production Maintenance Cold Work Normal Production Normal Production
1 1 1 1 1
80
49
Condensate
Minor
50 51
Condensate Gas
Minor Significant
1 1 2
52 53 54 Total = 24 1995/96
1 1 1
55
Non Process
Lub Oil
Minor
Normal Production
56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 Total = 9 1996/97 64 65 66 67 68 69
Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Gas Gas
Normal Production Normal Production Reinstatement Reinstatement Reinstatement Testing Construction Hot Work Construction Hot Work
30 715
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process
Reinstatement Shutting Down Testing Normal Production Normal Production Maintenance Cold Work
Heat generated between the rotating stationery mechanical seal faces was the source of ignition. Hot metal surface of turbine casing. Thought to be hot surface of burner inlet pipework. Exhaust of number one main engine. High temperature on top of caterpillar engine. Flash fire on hot turbine exhaust.
1 300 1 1 1 1 1
60
81
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81
Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Oil Condensate Condensate Gas Gas Gas Gas
Significant Minor Minor Minor Significant Minor Minor Minor Minor Significant Significant
Reinstatement Start-up Normal Production Reinstatement Start-up Start-up Construction Cold Work Maintenance Hot Work Maintenance Hot Work Maintenance Hot Work Start-up
1620 45 1200 60 60
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total = 18 1997/98
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Non Process Non Process Non Process Gas Gas Gas Gas Gas Gas Non Pr ocess Non Process
Reinstatement Maintenance Hot Work Start-up Drilling Maintenance Hot Work Sampling Maintenance Hot Work Normal Production Start-up Start -up Normal Production
Total = 9 1998/99
91 92
Significant Minor
93
Non Process
Lub Oil
Minor
Turbine exhaust (two UV flame detectors activated and CO2 manually discharged). Turbine had been
82
94
Non Process
Lub Oil
Minor
Shut Down
15
95 96 97 98 99 100
Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process
Normal Production Normal Production Shutting Down Reinstatement Start-up Normal Production
15 60
1 1 1 1 1 1
101
Oil
Minor
Cleaning
102
Condensate
Minor
Maintenance Cold Work Start-up Construction Hot Work Construction Cold Work
1 1 1 1
1 1 1
83
111 112
Diesel Diesel
Minor Minor
Reinstatement Reinstatement
1 120 1
Lub Oil
Shut Down Normal Production Construction Hot Work Maintenance Hot Work Maintenance Hot Work Normal Production
1 1 1 1 1 1
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131
Non Process Non Process Non Non Non Non Non Non Oil Gas Gas Gas Gas Process Process Process Process Process Process
Lub Oil Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Lub Oil Diesel
Minor Minor Minor Minor Minor Minor Minor Significant Minor Minor Significant Minor Minor
Routine Maintenance Maintenance Replacement Normal Production Normal Production Normal Production Normal Production Normal Production Start Up Construction Hotwork Normal Production Construction Hotwork Maintenance Hotwork Normal Production
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 60 1 1 1
Total = 13
84
Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Non Process Oil Oil Condensate Condensate Gas Gas Gas Gas Gas Gas Gas Gas Gas
85
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Minor Minor Significant Minor Minor Minor Minor Minor Minor Minor Significant Minor Minor Minor Minor Significant Significant Significant Minor Minor Significant Minor Minor Minor Minor Significant Minor Minor Minor Minor
Visual Visual Heat Visual Visual Sound Visual Flame Visual Visual Visual Flame Flame Visual Visual Flame Flame Smoke Sound Visual Sound Sound Visual Visual Visual Heat Visual Flame Flame Visual
Manual Shutdown, Other Action Muster at Stations, Other Action Auto Shutdown, Auto Blowdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations, Other Action Other Action Manual Shutdown, Muster at Stations, Other Action Manual Shutdown, Other Action Other Action Auto Shutdown, Manual Blowdown, Manual Deluge, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations, Other Action Manual Shutdown, Other Action Muster at Stations, Other Action Manual Shutdown, Other Action Auto CO2/Halon Manual Shutdown, Auto Deluge, Other Action Other Action Other Action Manual Shutdown Manual Shutdown Manual Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations, Other Action Manual Shutdown, Muster at Stations, Other Action Auto Deluge Other Action Other Action Other Action Other Action Manual Shutdown, Muster at Stations, Other Action Auto Shutdown, Manual Blowdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Other Action Manual Shutdown, Muster at Stations Manual Shutdown Auto Shutdown, Auto CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations Other Action
Total = 24 1995/96 55 56 57 58 59 60
86
Lub Oil Lub Oil Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Lub Oil Lub Oil
87
88
89
90
HYDROCARBON VE TYPE
DETECTION MODE
TOTALS
HEAT
SMOKE FLAME
GAS
LIQUIDS
GAS
2-PHASE
0 5 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 4 10
0 5 6 1 4 2 0 2 0 1 11 8 20
0 12 28 0 4 5 0 0 1 0 16 34 50
14 321 434 103 806 336 34 141 23 151 1268 793 2212
Totals for the period 1-10-92 to 31-03-01 More than one type of detection may occur in relation to any one incident Further breakdown of OTHER is shown in Table 9
91
LIQUIDS
Maj Sig Min Maj
GAS
Sig Min Maj
2-PHASE
Sig Min
10 0 2 0 0 0 12
298 5 3 24 0 0 330
22 4 6 5 0 3 40
88 15 1 28 3 2 137
17 1 0 0 0 2 20
79 6 2 2 0 4 93 133
19 0 0 1 0 0 20
1267
Data for the period 1-10-92 to 31-03-01 More than one type of detection may occur in relation to any one incident
92
LIQUIDS Maj Sig 1 35 8 149 5 117 1 14 2 33 11 254 0 0 0 2 14 299 0 5 0 7 14 289 2 49 0 2 12 250 5 155 9 146 14 301
Min 51 205 166 23 36 363 6 1 415 9 12 401 57 5 360 218 204 422
HYDROCARBON TYPE GAS Maj Sig Min 35 168 84 37 330 109 27 241 119 21 135 41 29 174 50 49 430 221 4 16 2 4 2 0 91 721 310 0 7 1 1 4 5 98 728 306 38 217 106 3 19 9 58 503 197 42 294 126 57 445 186 99 739 312
Maj 7 15 8 4 7 19 0 3 27 0 0 30 15 0 15 14 16 30
TOTALS Min 1 18 2 1 6 14 0 0 21 0 0 21 0 0 21 7 14 21 404 951 716 255 374 1442 29 12 2030 23 29 2019 520 40 1511 912 1159 2071
93
Table 11 : CAUSATION & OPERATING MODE versus RELEASE TYPE & SEVERITY
CAUSATION FACTORS HYDROCARBON TYPE & SEVERITY LIQUIDS GAS 2-PHASE Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min Maj Sig 2 45 61 24 126 36 3 21 0 47 80 5 61 38 9 34 6 139 191 48 343 112 13 56 2 12 11 2 35 9 0 4 1 10 17 4 32 14 1 9 0 26 60 17 115 31 5 10 5 85 96 27 168 76 7 28 1 2 2 0 3 1 7 30 12 36 51 4 9 34 10 38 53 4 2 15 3 17 17 2 6 83 36 90 123 16 6 57 9 32 49 5 3 0 1 3 1 1 2 16 6 13 25 1 TOTALS Min 3 3 12 1 1 3 3 0 0 2 2 1 0
OPERATIONAL FAULT
1362
1116
PROCEDURAL FAULT
588
5 6 1 1 0 0 1 14
25 150 25 10 30 14 47 301
18 237 16 10 43 21 77 422
7 50 10 4 11 2 15 99
44 107 15 18 44 13 71 312
5 15 3 1 1 2 3 30
21 76 7 4 6 6 13 133
2 16 0 1 1 1 0 21
2071
Notes: 1. Data for the period 1-10-92 to 31-03-01 2. There may be several causation factors contributing to any one incident
94
5.0
FIGURES
CONTENTS
Figure 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
95
2-Phase 8.9%
184 239
1150
151
Gas 55.5%
1. Total number of releases = 2071 2. Figures for the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-01
96
Month
1992/93
1993/94
1994/95
1995/96
1996/97
1997/98
1998/99
1999/00
2000/01
1. 2.
Reported releases for the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-01 = 2071 Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly average for 1992/93 = 14 average for 1993/94 = 23 average for 1994/95 = 27 average for 1995/96 = 18 average for 1996/97 = 19 average for 1997/98 = 18 average for 1998/99 = 20 average for 1999/00 = 20 average for 2000/01 = 23 (81 in total) (271 in total) (325 in total) (212 in total) (226 in total) (218 in total) (234 in total) (234 in total) (270 in total) October 1992 August 1993 October 1994 October 1995 April 1996 October 1996 November 1996 December 1999 December 2001 Database Start-up Guidance Issued First Outputs Report Issued Second Outputs Report Issued RIDDOR Offshore Third Outputs Report Issued Revised Guidance Issued Fourth Outputs Report Issue Fifth Outputs Report Issued
97
ALL
92/93 12 50 19 81
No. of Releases
100
50
Year
Start-up of Database on 01-10-1992 1. 1992/93 covers the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-93 only 2. Total number of releases reported to 31-03-01 = 2071
98
GAS
92/93 9 34 10 53
93/94 16 96 41 153
95/96 12 86 24 122
96/97 14 74 20 108
97/98 6 79 29 114
98/99 8 85 31 124
99/00 11 79 46 136
00/01 7 74 60 141
No. of Releases
100
MINOR
50
Year
Start-up of Database on 01-10-1992 1. 1992/93 covers the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-93 only 2. Total number of gas releases reported to 31-03-01 = 1150
99
LIQUIDS
92/93 1 12 9 22
93/94 4 32 53 89
94/95 1 53 56 110
95/96 2 30 34 66
96/97 3 40 54 97
97/98 1 40 37 78
98/99 2 31 53 86
99/00 0 35 47 82
00/01 0 28 79 107
No. of Releases
99/00
00/01
Year
Start-up of Database on 01-10-1992 1. 1992/93 covers the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-93 only 2. Total number of liquid releases reported to 31-03-01 = 737 100
2-PHASE
92/93 2 4 0 6
93/94 4 22 3 29
94/95 3 9 4 16
95/96 6 18 0 24
96/97 2 15 4 21
97/98 6 20 0 26
98/99 5 18 1 24
99/00 1 12 3 16
00/01 1 15 6 22
No. of Releases
10
Year
Start-up of Database on 01-10-1992 1. 1992/93 covers the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-93 only 2. Total number of 2-Phase releases reported to 31-03-01 = 184
101
1. 2. 3.
Failure Rates shown for top 15 out of 52 system types. Figures for the period 1-10-92 to 31-03-01. Caution should be exercised when interpreting the failure rate for subsea gas injection well As this calculation is based on a very small equipment population.
102
1. 2.
Failure Rates shown for top 15 out of 119 equipment types. Figures for the period 1-10-92 to 31-03-01.
103
104
As indicated in the executive summary and elsewhere in this report, OSD has undertaken an initiative to deal with Process Integrity concerns as a result of the reporting plateau (see earlier comments) shown by recent offshore hydrocarbon release statistics, and by trends identified from these statistics.
The initiative is aimed at increasing the awareness of the current unsatisfactory situation, to identify root causes to bring greater emphasis on the necessity to reduce offshore hydrocarbon releases, and to influence those people in the best position to bring that about.
1)
occurred during the planning year to 31 March 2001, which included offshore visits by Inspectors for all major and some significant releases. The results of this work are documented in offshore technology report OTO 2001/055 - OSD Hydrocarbon Release Reduction Campaign - Report on the hydrocarbon release incident investigation project 01/04/2000 to 31/03/2001.
2)
3)
at least annually, and the first two of these were held on 9 November 2000 at Ardoe House near Aberdeen, and on 7 November 2001 at Brittannia Hotel, Aberdeen. Proceedings for these seminars are available from UKOOA .
105
106
As indicated in the introduction to this report, there have been discussions with the offshore industry on a classification system for hydrocarbon releases. The consensus reached is that all reported releases can be classified as minor, significant or major by applying agreed definitions and provisional classification criteria. DEFINITIONS : The definitions were agreed as follows :
MAJOR :
"Potential to quickly impact outwith the local area, e.g. affect the
Temporary Refuge (TR), escape routes, escalate to other areas of the installation, causing serious injury or fatalities."
A major leak, if ignited, would be likely to cause a "major accident", i.e. it would be of a size capable of causing multiple casualties or rapid escalation affecting TR, escape routes, etc.
SIGNIFICANT :
the local area and to escalate within that local area, e.g. by causing structural damage, secondary leaks or damage to safety systems."
A significant leak, if ignited, might have the potential to cause an event severe enough to be viewed as a "major accident" or be of a size leading to significant escalation within the immediate area or module.
MINOR :
A minor leak, even if ignited, would not be expected to result in a multiple fatality event or significant escalation, but could cause serious injuries or a fatality local to the leak site or within that module only. 107
Any offshore hydrocarbon release reportable under RIDDOR 95 can be classified under one of the above definitions, using criteria reported on the OIR/12 form. It was also decided to group all releases of hydrocarbon liquid under one category of "liquids", since oil, condensate, and non-process liquids (diesel, helifuel, glycol, etc.) share the common characteristics of flammable fluids. CRITERIA
The simplest criteria for classification is to use inventory released. This can be further refined by taking into account hole size and duration, pressure, congestion factors a nd a variety of other mitigation factors. At the time of preparation of this report, the preferred criteria were based on quantity released, release rate and duration. It should be noted, however, that discussions with industry on further refinement of the criteria are still ongoing. (See Implementation at the end of this Appendix.)
MAJOR :
(i) Gas Releases : EITHER OR [Quantity released > 300 kg] [Mass release rate>1kg/s AND Duration >5 mins]
This could result in a jet fire of over 10 metres length (>1kg/s) capable of causing significant escalation after 5 minutes duration, or a flash fire/explosion on reaching LFL. Where 300 kg equates to approx. 3000 m3 explosive cloud at NTP, enough to fill an entire module or deck area, and to cause serious escalation if ignited.
108
(ii) Liquid Releases (Oil/Condensate/Non-process) : EITHER OR [Quantity released > 9,000 kg] [Mass release rate>10kg/s AND Duration >15 mins]
This could result in a pool fire over 10 metres in diameter (>10kg/s) filling a module or cutting off a deck, hi ndering escape and affecting more than one person directly if lasting for over 15 minutes duration.
(iii) 2-Phase Releases : EITHER OR [Quantity of liquids released > 300 kg] [Liquids mass release rate>1kg/s AND Duration >5 mins]
Combinations of the major gas and liquids scenarios described above are possible, depending on the gas to oil ratio (GOR) involved.
MINOR :
(i) Gas Releases : EITHER OR [Quantity released < 1 kg] [Mass release rate <0.1 kg/s AND Duration < 2 mins]
This could result in a jet fire of less than 5 metres length (< 0.1 kg/s) which is unstable (< 2 mins duration) and therefore unlikely to cause significant escalation , or a flash fire/explosion on reaching LFL. Where <1 kg equates to <10 m3 explosive cloud at NTP, probably insufficient to cause a significant hazard if ignited.
(ii) Liquid Releases (Oil/Condensate/Non-process) : EITHER OR [Quantity released < 60 kgs] [Mass release rate <0.2 kg/s AND Duration < 5 mins]
This could result in a pool fire smaller than 2 metres in diameter (< 0.2 kg/s) unlikely to last long enough to hi nder escape (< 5 mins), but could cause serious injury to persons nearby.
109
(iii) 2-Phase Releases : EITHER OR [Quantity released < 1 kg] [Liquids release rate <0.1 kg/s AND Duration < 2 mins]
Combinations of the gas and liquids scenarios described above are possible, depending on GOR involved.
(i) Gas Releases : Capable of jet fires of 5 to 10 metres lasting for between 2 -5 minutes, or release rates between 0.1 to 1.0 kg/s lasting 2-5 minutes giving explosive clouds of between 10 and 3000 m3 in size.
(ii) Liquids Releases (Oil/Condensate/Non-process) : Pool fires between 2 and 10 metres in diameter, lasti ng for between 5 and 15 minutes.
(iii) 2-Phase Releases : Combinations of the gas and liquids scenarios described above are possible. IMPLEMENTATION
All current and future releases will be classified according to the above agreed criteria for the types of hydrocarbons involved, and the results used in HCR statistics reports.
Any further refinement of the criteria will be retrospectively applied, and the severities adjusted where necessary.
It is important to note, however, that those releases with a hole size labelled N/A are special cases where the release rate is not applicable to the mode of release (e.g. open topped vessels such as shale shakers, or where carry-over of hydrocarbons from one system to another was involved). All such releases were classified by inspection of the amount released only. 110
Other (specify) _________________________________________ 2. Does this report satisfy your requirements with regard to Offshore Hydrocarbon releases? Completely c Poorly c More than 50% c Not at all c
3. Please indicate areas in which you think a change would be beneficial: * More / less discussion * More / less graphs c c * More / less tables c
* delete as necessary
Any other details as required: ____________________________________________________________________ 4. It is planned to publish a separate analysis report on offshore hydrocarbon release. Would you like to receive such reports on an annual basis? Yes c No c
5. Would you be prepared to pay a nominal charge to cover production costs for future reports? Statistics Report Analysis Report Yes Yes c c No No c c
6. To what use do you put the hydrocarbon release statistics? Safety Case Development Reliability/Availability Health & Safety Management Please return completed form to: c c c Project Development Risk Assessment c c Ind. Relations Design c c
Other (specify) ___________________________________________ HSE, Hazardous Installations Directorate CD4C Data Management Room 201 Merton House Stanley Road Bootle L20 3DL
111