http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:G3nw10Dq1JwJ:www.scribd.

com /doc/45751514/ - June 11, 2012

-----------------------------------------

Abstract The researcher tac led the scientific basis of third person effect the ries with focusing on the gate eeper theory and the third person e fect theory. Although this theory is not an effective theory, even if the researcher sees that it has an effect on the media content , the communication representative effects on the media content through controlling the media content. Also, the study focused on understan ing the third person effect theory and the role of the communication representative in it as the main objective of the study. The study also aimed to understand the role of the communication representative in light of the gate ee per theory. The study concentrated on reali ing the similarities and differences between the gate eeper theory and the third person effect theory as well as the role of the communication representative in it. The study has utilized the qual itative approach as a way to reach results and analyze such results. The study f ound some of the significant results ; in the third person effect theory, the co mmunication representatives role consists in realizing the media effect associate d with the communication representatives behaviors. Also, the journalists feel wi th the media effects of the Press career and this feeling motivates them to pres ent good media wor s, but, regarding the communication representative role in lig ht of the Gate eeper theory , his role is limited to realizing the media effect of the media values of the media institutions then the personal , the emergence of the media institutions and the size of the public as factors affecting the co mmunication representative , and stic ing to the professional media values . The study also revealed some of the 199 philosophical discrepancies for the journalists inside the news room and the fie ld editors or the correspondents. The study noticed the di ference of criteria a nd values of journalists inside the news room and field editors when judging the media materials and judging the effect on self and public , the emergence of th e role of the media institutions in influencing the journalists inside the news room , while the effect of the media institution is less on the field journalist s or correspon ents. Concepts of the study 1 Gate eeper theory 2 Third person ef fect theory 3 Cognitive side 4 Behavioral side 5 Difference and conformity betwe en theories 200

).

Gate eeper theory

Third person effect theory ( )Davson (

1.

2.

: . 1. ( 3002)

. 9. (7991 ) ucation in Journalism and mass communication in san Antonio Texas August 2005. 3 - Julie ,M. Duc , Michael A. Hogg, Deborah ,J.Terry.)1995(the pe ceived influenc e of Aids Advertising: third-person Effects in the context of positive media con tent Journal article ,Basic and applied Social psychology,17,. 4- prabu David, M elissa A. Johnson,)1998( the role of Self in thirdperson Effects A bout Body Ima ge Journal article; Journal of co munication, Vol.48. 5- Davison, W.p )1983( he third person effect in communication, public opinion Quarterly, 48, 1-15. 6- Mut z,D)1994( third- Person effects on publication of a Holocaustdenial advetisement .Journal of communication,48,3-26. 7- Dupagne, M. salwen, M.B. & paulm B.)2000( Impact of order on the third person effect ) California: Santa Barbara(. 8- Evel and, W.P & McLeod, D M.)1999( the effect of social Desirabi ity on perception, i nternational Journal of public opinion Research, Vol. 11, no.4. 9- Gunther, A. C . & Mundym p.)1993(Biased optimism and the third person Effect, Journalism Quart erly 70. 10- Richard M. Perloff)1999( The Third-Person Effect: a Critical R 217 view and Synthesis Journal article; Media Psychology, Vol. 1, 11- Wolfram Peiser , Jochen Peter)2000( Third-Person Perception of Television-Viewing Behavior Jour nal article. Journal of Commun cation.Vol. 50, 12- Ven-Hwei Lo, Ran Wei)2002(Thi rd-Person Effect, Gender and Pornography on the Internet Journal article; Journa l of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.Vol.46, 13- Gordon C. Bruner Ii, Anand Kuma r)2000( Web Commercials and Advertising Hierarchy-of-Effects Journal article; Jo urnal of A vertising Research. 14- Cohen, J., & Davis, R. G. ) 1991 (. Third-pers on effects and the di ferential impact in negative political advertising. Journal ism Qua terly, 68. 15- Gunther, A. C., & Thorson, E. ) 1992 (. Perceived persuasi ve e fects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effect in new domains. Communication Research, 19. 16- Ber off, R.)1981(can you separate the sizzle from the stea ? Jou nal of popular culture 15.P191 17- Davis on, W.P. )1996(. The third-person effect revisited. Intern tional Journal of Pub lic Opinion Research, 8. 18- Davison, W.P. )1983(. The third-person effect in co

mmunication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47. 19- Gunther, A. )1991(. What we thin others thin : Cause and co sequence in the third-person effect. Communication R esearch, 18. 20- Brosius, H., & Engle, D. )1996(. The causes of third-person eff ects Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative a titudes towards media influence? International Journal of Public Opinion Research,8. 21Defleur and Dennis )1996( Understanding mass communication, Houghton Mifflin co mpany. 218