March 01, 2012 The CSC COMELEC Through: Prof.

Michael Madamba, SAO Director for Students Affairs Sir: Good Day! In the response of the letter dated February 28, 2012 questioning me, why I should not be disqualified pursuant to the provision ARTICLE III, Section 8 of the CSC Election Code, which provides: Section 8. A candidate violating any of the above mentioned provisions shall be disqualified from running. Well it is clear that our willingness to serve the students cannot be questioned anymore as what we are going to pursue with and plan for the next school year. With that we are not running because we believe that as a servant leader of the school you have to look the betterment of the students not because you are been dictated by someone else to run for a certain position, as on officer you must have your own decision to firm and stand with. As the winning candidates for the CSC treasurer the students votes are the evidence that proves that I am the winner, the votes shall represent the voice of the student within the four angles of the school which it cannot be questioned anymore and it must be respected by the majority of the students. As a leader you must also dedicate your time to settle the problems that you may encountered on your way. You may serve also as the liaison to watch the transaction of every department as the prime arbiter of the school the CENTRAL STUDENT COUNCIL (CSC) as a treasurer; you must know your functions and responsibilities for that position. And if you know where to go I do believe that they would entertain you and adore. Therefore, you must give respect also and be respected as a servant leader for the goodness of all. In the defense of the allege protest by Ms. Kristel Danne Baptista serve as the complainant the campaign materials that we have is only the small one which is entitled to the said ARTICLE 2 of the CSC Election Code, which reads: Section 2. Each party as a whole or the candidates separately can distribute campaign materials, provided it is in accordance with the size of of a medium size bond. First Issueif you notice the word- in accordance with the size of of a medium size bond- our campaign materials is in the said length not exceeding to size of the bond paper and according to a law students from Northwestern University (NWU), the said size is just appropriate for it. Second, we must say that an Open Letter is different from campaign materials. The Material that the complainant argued is the said Open Letter referring for the size of (8 x 11). It is true that the exactly size of that one the complainant addresses is the size of a medium bond paper. But if we see the Logic the Open Letter is just a view of the said response of Mr. Mario Tuliao, about his disqualification on the said issue. In which Mr. Mario Tuliao would like to inform everybody that he is not qualified to run anymore for that position that he applied for it. Students are asking why, and then he addresses this in an open letter that is given to the students and serves as the campaign manager of the group. As a group we paved respects to his decision and give our best not to crackdown our innocent mind to be panic but Mr. Mariao Tuliao serves as our guidance in the previous campaign especially on the room to room campaign. Third, the content of our campaign cannot be questioned. It is our freedom to express our own sentiments. Wherein we paved respect to the person that caters a big responsibility as a guiding star. Wherein, we are in the form of advertising ourselves-to catch the attention- of every students is our goal not to be criticized or to put malicious act unto it. As what the Mass Communication do, if youre advertisement is not so good how would you attract the people to buy or appreciate the product that you are going to sell for?

Second Issue: The General Assembly/Meeting of SBA students (JAYCEES) at the DWCL Gymnasium on February 22, 2012 Wherein, our party mates understand the said protest but we have a letter that was pass by our Campaign Manager, which it is valid and witness by my fellow party mates. This is without notice to the Director for Student Affairs (DSA) and/or the 2012 CSC COMELEC. The notice is presented and approved by one of the CSC COMELEC signed the said letter and duly been approved before the meeting of the said SBA students. Where, the said complaint is not a ground for disqualification on behalf of my party mates PRO-STUDENTS ADVOCATES PARTY. Respectfully Yours,

Renell Marc R. Rafael BSEd 4