Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2/11
Introduction
Recreational use of cannabis has become more socially accepted in western societies than ever before and has increasingly become a part of our culture (National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 1988-2010), the laws and education on this drug however remain unchanged and are inconsistent with more recent scientific data, accessible information and with public opinion. The contrast of available information and the dismissal of harm reduction policies have fueled the problematic use of cannabis, especially in teenagers and young adults.
CANNABIS ABUSE - THE RITUAL OF DAILY USE substance identified by respected etymologists, linguists, anthropologists, botanists and other researchers as cannabis, extracted into about six quarts of olive oil, along with a variety of other fragrant herbs. The ancient anointed ones were literally drenched in this potent mixture. The events of the Book of Exodus occurred around 1450 B.C. estimates Richards (1990) in the book Revell Bible Dictionary. Though the use of cannabis dates back over 5,000 years, prohibition is only very recent, dating back only 100 years; states began banning cannabis around the same time as alcohol (1910s), according to Gieringer (1999), with the difference cannabis status never changed.
3/11
Education
In 1933 marijuana became the target of government control. Sensationalistic stories linked violent acts to cannabis consumption (Earleywine, 2005). This was followed by Reefer Madness, a 1936 propaganda exploitation film. According to Murphy & Studney (1998): Reefer Madness is a morality tale of how Reefer Addiction ruins the life of its young protagonist and gets a lot of other people killed, sexually compromised and committed to lunatic asylums. It was intended to scare the living bejeezus out of every parent who viewed it. Since the 1930s cannabis has been viewed as a dangerous drug, by parents, government and the education system. The war on cannabis continued, in 1971 Nixon declared the War on Drugs, in the late 1980s Nancy Reagan created the slogan and advertising campaign Just Say No. D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education), a law enforcement-operated education program, was founded in 1983. The evidence against its effectiveness is overwhelming:
Paul D. Spradling [4060694] FIU ANT 3241 [Myth, Ritual, Mysticism] Summer A
CANNABIS ABUSE - THE RITUAL OF DAILY USE In 1998, a from the University of Maryland resulted in a report to the NIJ, which among other statements, concluded that "D.A.R.E. does not work to reduce substance use." (Sherman, Gottfredson, et al., 1998) In 2001, the Surgeon General of the United States, David Satcher M.D. Ph.D., placed the D.A.R.E. program in the category of "Ineffective Primary Prevention Programs". (Satcher, 2001). The U.S. General Accountability Office concluded in 2003 that the program was sometimes counterproductive in some populations, with those who graduated from D.A.R.E. later having higher than average rates of drug use (a boomerang effect). A ten year study was completed by the American Psychological Association in 2006 involving one thousand D.A.R.E. graduates in an attempt to measure the effects of the program. After the ten year period no measurable effects were noted. In March 2007, the D.A.R.E. program was placed on a list of treatments that have the potential to cause harm in clients in the APS journal, Perspectives on Psychological Science (Lilienfeld, 2007). Despite the evidence D.A.R.E.s program has widely been the norm for drug education, it has been implemented in 75% of the nation's school districts, and 43 countries (from official D.A.R.E. website). The D.A.R.E. program promotes zero-tolerance and reflects the "zero-tolerance orthodoxy of current U.S. drug control policy. Harm reduction based laws and education would be much more beneficial but are criticized and dismissed by many groups who still hang on to the outdated and failed ideas. Browns (1995) report to the California Department of Education stated: California's drug education programs, D.A.R.E. being the largest of them, simply don't work. More than 40 percent of the students told researchers they were 'not at all' influenced by drug educators or programs. Nearly 70 percent reported neutral to negative feelings about those delivering the antidrug [sic] message. While only 10 percent of elementary students responded to drug education negatively or indifferently, this figure grew to
4/11
Paul D. Spradling [4060694] FIU ANT 3241 [Myth, Ritual, Mysticism] Summer A
CANNABIS ABUSE - THE RITUAL OF DAILY USE 33 percent of middle school students and topped 90 percent at the high school level. What image are we giving our children?
5/11
CANNABIS ABUSE - THE RITUAL OF DAILY USE incorrect statements. This information has shaped the youths public opinion on cannabis, most teens believe (some even openly recite) that cannabis is not addictive, does not cause brain damage, is not a gateway drug, has medicinal properties, has never killed anyone (no overdose) and is generally not that bad, or even less harmful than alcohol (of the teenagers questioned, most agreed with most of these statements). The current drug policies implemented in laws and education have created a backlash of available information and created a polarization of opinion (teenagers view Reefer Madness nowadays and laugh at it). This polarization can be easily seen online, where you find anti-cannabis groups, usually dispelling false information, and pro-cannabis groups who dedicate to refuting the anti-cannabis arguments. This creates a big problem, which is the loss of a middle point. The laws and education on cannabis have created overwhelming amounts of pro-cannabis messages/info/opinions online, in the process, information and studies dealing with actual problems of cannabis use have lost their influence; they are mistaken for propaganda or simply disregarded/ignored by teenagers. The war on drugs has created exactly that, a war, and a polarization of ideas, which in turn is fueling problematic use of cannabis. It is interesting to note two of the participants I interviewed claimed they believed cannabis to be completely harmless and even to be beneficial for them when they started consuming it daily 5-6 years ago. It is also interesting to note they do not share these opinions anymore, one of them even stated he felt cheated by the system, blaming his problems with cannabis on it. The polarization of young adults ideas on cannabis, along with the influence in art (stoner movies, music), have created a problematical ritual of consumption: the ritual of
6/11
Paul D. Spradling [4060694] FIU ANT 3241 [Myth, Ritual, Mysticism] Summer A
CANNABIS ABUSE - THE RITUAL OF DAILY USE daily use. Snoop Dogg exclaims it directly in his song The Next Episode so blaze the weed out there, blaze it up, smoke weed everyday.
7/11
In 2003, more than 25 million persons (10.6 percent) aged 12 or older reported past year use of marijuana. An estimated 3.1 million persons (1.3 percent of the population and 12.2 percent of past year marijuana users) were daily marijuana users (i.e., they used marijuana on 300 or more days in the past 12 months).
Paul D. Spradling [4060694] FIU ANT 3241 [Myth, Ritual, Mysticism] Summer A June 14, 2012 Professor Ida Tafari
CANNABIS ABUSE - THE RITUAL OF DAILY USE According to National Survey on Drug Use and Healths (2010) report: In 2010, an estimated 15.7 percent of past year marijuana users aged 12 or older used marijuana on 300 or more days within the past 12 months. This translates into 4.6 million persons using marijuana on a daily or almost daily basis over a 12-month period. In 2010, an estimated 39.9 percent (6.9 million) of current marijuana users aged 12 or older used marijuana on 20 or more days in the past month. This represents an increase from the 2009 estimates of 36.7 percent or 6.1 million users. Sullum (May 2, 2012) found: Monitoring the Future Study put "heavy" use at 7 percent of all high school students last year, who are more likely to smoke pot than younger students are. I focus on daily cannabis use for 3 reasons: 1. It is common in 18-25 year olds (evidence above) 2. Daily and sustained use is the most problematic. Swift, Copeland & Lenton (2000, p103) report: The most probable adverse health effects of acute use are generally selflimiting and do not persist beyond intoxication. On the other hand the most probable effects of regular (daily or near daily), sustained use (over several years) are: dependence, cognitive impairment, emotional development issues and adverse respiratory effects. 3. It is especially dangerous in adolescence. Swift, Copeland & Lenton (2000, p107) report: A major focus of concern is cannabis use in adolescence, a time of rapid development and transi- tions in life roles. While most adolescent use remains experimental, early onset and adolescent cannabis use have been related to a number of negative outcomes such as poor mental health, drug use and abuse, delinquent behaviour and criminality and poor educational achievement.
8/11
Paul D. Spradling [4060694] FIU ANT 3241 [Myth, Ritual, Mysticism] Summer A
9/11
CANNABIS ABUSE - THE RITUAL OF DAILY USE Answer2: Weed is not bad! Answer3: It will damage your lungs. (http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080825145848AAMqp wM) These was not one good answer. I encountered this question multiple times online, most of the times the answers were pro or anti cannabis, unrelated to the original question, or missed the point (states physical harm caused by smoking of cannabis, does not focus on psychological harm which is unique to cannabis, not the act of smoking it). It is important to educate with facts, and warn on real dangers. This has been impossible do to prohibition and drug policy on education. Zero-tolerance fails, harm reduction is needed. Issues with cannabis can be found, there are support forums where many people talk about the problems their daily use has caused them: (http://www.uncommonforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=679319 http://www.forummatters.com/forums/forumdisplay.php/16-Cannabis-Weed-PotMarijuana-Addiction) When cannabis impedes in your functioning, it is a problem. When used for medicinal purposes cannabis helps patience function better. That is a fundamental difference.
10/11
Conclusion
Current drug policies are counter-productive and are fueling problematic use. Cannabis use is more common than ever before, especially among teens. Daily use in adolescence may cause developmental problems, more research and emphasis is needed on this issue. Proper information and education is our best tool against drug abuse. Drug education should be designed, planned and possible even taught by people with personal experience and knowledge in the area. Paul D. Spradling [4060694] FIU ANT 3241 [Myth, Ritual, Mysticism] Summer A June 14, 2012 Professor Ida Tafari
11/11
References
Bennett, Chris, "Was Jesus a Stoner?," High Times Magazine, Feb. 10, 2003 D.A.R.E Official Website, www.dare.com Deitch, Robert, Hemp: American History Revisited: The Plant with a Divided History, 2003 Earleywine, Mitchell, Understanding Marijuana: A New Look at the Scientific Evidence, 2005 Gieringer, Dale H., "The Forgotten Origins of Cannabis Prohibition in
California," Contemporary Drug Problems, 1999 Hamilton, Denise. The Truth About D.A.R.E.; The big-bucks antidrug program for kids doesn't work - Los Angeles New Times, March 20, 1997 Lilienfeld, S. O., Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 53-70, 2007 Murphy, Kevin, Studney, Dan, "Reefer Madness History", 1998 National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Marijuana Research Findings: 1976, 1977 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 1988-2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, Nov. 26, 2004 Richard, Lawrence, O., Revell Bible Dictionary, 1990 Satcher, David, - Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2001, Chapter 5 Sherman, Lawrence W.; Gottfredson, Denise; MacKenzie, Doris; Eck, John; Reuter, Peter; Bushway, Shawn - Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesnt, Whats Promising. Report for the National Institute of Justice. Sullum, Reason Magazine, May 2, 2012 Swift, Wendy; Copeland, Jan; Lenton, Simon; Cannabis and harm reduction, 2010, p100110 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080825145848AAMqpwM http://www.uncommonforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=679319 http://www.forummatters.com/forums/forumdisplay.php/16-Cannabis-Weed-PotMarijuana-Addiction
Paul D. Spradling [4060694] FIU ANT 3241 [Myth, Ritual, Mysticism] Summer A