Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
9-18-2006
ARQ, Chapter 3
Thesis: In order to evaluate an argument you must identify and evaluate the
order to create an argument. You can sometimes identify the reasons in a statement by
looking for phrases such as, “as a result of,” “because of the fact that,” “in view of,” and
There are different kinds of reasons that people will give to back up their opinion.
One kind of reason is evidence. Evidence consists of facts that come from empirical
conclusion that makes an observation about the world. The example used in the book is
that college women smoke more than college men. The reasons for that conclusion were
Another reason that people will give to support a conclusion are general
statements or they will describe their beliefs or principles. This is usually only done in
prescriptive arguments. The example given in the book is a paragraph stating that grade
inflation is a good reason to eliminate grades completely. The reasons for that conclusion
were not evidence but they amounted to one opinion stacked on top of another.
should also circle indicator words, underline reasons, write notes in margins, label
conclusions and reasons in the margin and use numbers to refer to reasons and
conclusions in margin notes and then use those numbers to go back and create a diagram
The book states that, “Weak reasons create weak reasoning.” Another signal of
spot in order to defend a previously held position or becomes emotional when asked to
give reasons for their opinion then they are using weak-sense critical thinking. When we
communicate we need to be clear about what our conclusions and reasons are.
I think that the book’s treatment of ‘weak-sense’ critical thinking is not useful.
There is nothing wrong with creating arguments for a belief on the spot. All arguments
are created somewhere; they may as well be created during a conversation as any other
time and place. You can’t fault them for defending a conclusion that they previously
hold. When people give a conclusion they almost always give a conclusion that they
Everybody has certain opinions that they will become emotional about. Just
because somebody gets emotional about something does not mean that their argument is
weak. For example, suppose somebody’s dog died. Suppose that this person tells me that
they miss their dog and I asked them to support that conclusion by saying, “Why should I
believe you when you tell me that you miss your dog?” In that situation I would be
engaging in what the book calls ‘strong-sense’ critical thinking. Most people would
happen then my friend who lost her dog would be engaging in ‘weak-sense’ critical
thinking.