Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
May-June 2012
the vital opportunity to put this government into power "opening to the masses new perspectives... to incommensurably increase the strength of the proletariat." Those perspectives would have been to speed up the process by which the reformist workers illusions in SYRIZA were smashed, and to speed up the formation of workers councils and militias independent of the capitalist state. Having missed that opportunity we have to have a perspective that mobilising workers on the streets and organising the workers councils and militias etc can build for an unlimited general strike that would probably put enough pressure on enough PASOK and KKE MPs to bring down the government. That would probably bring in a left government under even more internal tension capable of "opening up new perspectives". So, What Next? What is our position on the current situation and on a new election that could come within months if not weeks? Here is an interesting statement from the Revolutionary Communist International Tendency well worth reading. http://redrave.blogspot.co.nz/2012/06/afterelections-on-17th-june-new-phase.html
Brief Stuff
Greece - What Next?
Greece has proved to be a real test for the left. Most failed the test miserably because they have no belief in the historic mission of the working class to overthrow capitalism. Rather, they have only a self-belief as a substitute. And that self-belief can only be sustained by opportunism and its reverse fear of opportunism sectarianism. Some do both because they are the terrible twins of pseudo Marxism. So the British SWP among its several factions in Greece could not agree on what is to be done. The opportunists look to SYRIZA to take the leadership of resistance to austerity, while the sectarians shunned them because they could not lead the resistance. But it turned out that the majority of Greek workers, and German imperialism did think SYRIZA would fight austerity. So between German Imperialism and the ultraleft Stalinists and Antarsya as well as other asserted self-proclaimed Trotskyists such as EEK, the working class was split, the left fell short, and a centrist Bonapartist type government formed by New Democracy and PASOK took power. As Trotsky said of Germany in the lead up to Hitlers victory in 1933, a united front against fascism includes an electoral united front: The Social Democracy
together with the Communist Party would not be able to seize power. There he stands, the snobbish, educated, petty bourgeois, an utter coward, soaked from head to foot with distrust and contempt for the masses. The Social Democracy and the Communist Party together hold about 40% of the votes, despite the fact that the betrayals of Social Democracy and the mistakes of the Communist Party drive millions in to the camp of indifferentism and even National Socialism. Once a fact, a joint action of these two parties alone, by opening before the masses new perspectives, would incommensurably increase the strength of the proletariat... What Next? p151
Pathfinder Edition So it was correct to call for a united front to get SYRIZA elected ("the fact") and call on the workers aligned to PASOK and KKE to push their leaders to give critical support to an anti-austerity left united front government. http://redrave.blogspot.co.nz/2012/06/greece-noelectoral-solution-for.html This proves again that the absence of a revolutionary party of sufficient strength to force PASOK and KKE workers to take up this program to elect a SYRIZA-led left government means that revolutionaries missed
May-June 2012 Revolutionary Socialists (RS) had a voice and could have raised and fought for this program. Even if mass strikes had failed to become a general strike and split the army, it could have forced the army to agree to a Constituent Assembly much more radical and democratic than the Mubarak Constitution that remains slightly amended today. Instead the RS never pushed for the youth to go back to the factories to build for general strike. Nor did they demand a Constituent Assembly that represented the masses. Instead they got trapped in the stageist argument that it was a progressive step to build a mass workers party to contest the elections under the reactionary Constitution. The broad left and liberal candidates lost while the MB clearly won the parliamentary elections. The left and liberal candidates who stood for the Presidency were beaten in the first round. Mohamed ElBaradei refused to stand under the reactionary constitution which was used by the army to annul the Parliamentary elections. But this did not stop the RS for advocating a vote in the second round for the MB candidate as the lesser evil to the army candidate. The RS has yet to retract this terrible mistake despite a barrage of protest from the left worldwide. http://tendancecoatesy.wordpress.com/2012/06/ 22/swp-backs-revolutionary-moslem-brotherhoodand-faces-torrent-of-criticism/ This episode shows that once it had turned its back on the militant working class and put its hopes in parliamentary reforms, it lost its bearings. What does the British SWP (parent group of the RS) say today? The official line is that the army is still in control but its better to have Mursi in power. His election has dealt the counter-revolution a serious blow! http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=289 20 Yet an important lesson seems to have been learned by the RS. It says the second round of the revolution must unite all the revolutionary forces against the counter-revolution. http://bit.ly/L3sF3a The youth of the squares must unite with the workers and poor peasants. Yet there is no set of transitional demands on how to organise and mobilise them for a general strike to split the army and bring down the regime. Once more we have a lot of talk, but no serious action program to stop the counter-revolution from smashing all the gains of the revolution.
May-June 2012
The board members of the ports of Auckland were picked as part of the restructure of Auckland in the invention of a Supercity. Where the elected Auckland Regional Council had run the port and used profits to subsidise public transport developments, the new board was hand-picked by Rodney Hide on behalf of global finance capitalism. The port was set up as Ports of Auckland Ltd (POAL), prepared for privatisation. It is ready for the next right-wing dominated council to privatise. Already the Ports of Auckland have contracted out work. They set up Conlinxx as a 70% POAL owned contractor that drives shuttles moves containers between ports and the Wiri inland port. The other (30%) player in this is NZL, a Tauranga based capitalist logistics contractor. This is a part privatisation at the port. Other private contractors getting in behind the gates are Spotless and Labour hire companies.
May-June 2012
workers by fighting for democratic, fighting unions that break from the bureaucracy and the bourgeois labour laws. http://redrave.blogspot.co.nz/2012/04/occupymayday-occupy-lenin.html
May-June 2012
materials and land in what is a rip, shit, bust process of recolonisation. Today this struggle cannot be won by indigenous struggles such as that of Maori nationalism. Maori are now divided along class lines with Iwi bosses voting for privatisation of assets, while the vast majority of Maori are at the bottom of the working class. We need to unite along class lines nationally and internationally across the whole Pacific to take back and take control of the resources we need to survive.
We need to prepare for Strikes, Occupations and Workers Control! Mass pickets to defend the jobs, and protect union workers! Mass pickets to shut down workplaces! Occupy against the 1%, workers control! For Occupations and Nationalisations without compensation under workers control! For a General Strike to defeat the NACTs and for a mass Workers Party based on the rank and file of the unions! For a Workers Government and planned socialist economy! For a Socialist Aotearoa in a Socialist Asia/Pacific!
May-June 2012
Keynesian solutions to the crisis are pushed. Keynes was a bourgeois economist who recognised that when profits fall the capitalists stop investing causing a slump. Keynes solution was to take over from the capitalists and use the state to borrow and spend on creating jobs and boosting incomes so that rising demand would trigger capitalists reinvesting in production. Roosevelts administration in the US and Labour Governments in NZ both applied Keynesian economics overcoming the worst effects of the Great Depression of the 1930s. In NZ the reformist left is pushing these solutions. Problem is inequality which can be fixed by state intervention. http://thestandard.org.nz/austerity-will-increaseinequality/ The budget then, rather than cutting back on expenditure, should borrow to boost working class incomes to stimulate demand and hence capital investment in supply to meet the rising demand. This should be part of a wider policy of state regulation, ownership and economic planning to eliminate the profiteering of the capitalists. . See the big debates over austerity vs. growth on Michael Roberts Blog. http://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/in equality-the-cause-of-crisis-and-depression/
Labours Budget
Of course capitalists argue that they are entitled to their profits, and to influence policy to restore them. They justify this as necessary for growth in the economy and the creation of rising incomes and living standards. Labour (social democratic) reformists agree with the capitalists that profits are earned rather than expropriated by capitalists. Capitalism is not inherently exploitative but there are some bad bosses (today the villains are usually Bankers) who ruthlessly exploit workers. They think that the cause of the crisis in not any inherent flaw in the economic system, but the wrong policies that create inequality and falling incomes for the poor. Labour accuses the NACTs as deliberately pushing austerity policies to enrich the already rich and worsening the gap between rich and poor. http://www.labour.org.nz/news/speech-changenothing-and-nothing-changes-%E2%80%93don%E2%80%99t-blame-greece The typical response of Social Democracy around the world is to replace austerity with growth. http://www.labour.org.nz/budget2012
Greens Budget
The Green leader Russel Norman says that the Greens would share austerity more fairly. http://www.greens.org.nz/features/budget-2012sharing-austerity-more-fairly They would tax the rich and capital gains, and redirect expenditure away from unproductive motorways, subsides to polluters etc and into a R&D and education for a smart green economy. This is a form of Green Keynesianism spending to boost clean, green, consumption. The Greens are also against selling state assets having shown that they contribute more in ongoing dividends than in a one off sale. But like the Labour Party they will not commit to buying these assets back. While some think that the Greens are now the real opposition http://tumeke.blogspot.co.nz/2012/05/when-willgreens-become-second-major.html without Labour swinging right under David Shearer, and would keep a future Labour government honest, there are those who think that the Greens could work with Labour under David Cunliffes leadership because he stands for Real
May-June 2012
The Marxist explanation of capitalist crisis is that is it caused by falling profits due to the inability of the capitalists to extract enough surplus value. This is the Tendency for the Rate of Profit to Fall. Bosses whose profits are falling stop investment, growth stagnates, and to restore the rate of profit the mass of capital has to be devalued as well as the value of wages until such time as the amount of surplus extracted represents a profit over total capital invested. The devaluation of the wages to restore profits is the essence of austerity. The state plays a key role in creating the conditions for the return to profitability. It introduce social and economic policies to increase the rate of exploitation (increasing the share of profits) by making workers work harder for less pay. Here we see a whole box of NACT austerity policies to attack living standards, workers rights, union rights, and attacks on beneficiaries and the sick and injured to drive them to work workfare and so on to make workers produce more value and cut the share of value going to wages. But that increased share of value does not go towards restoring profits if it is taxed to pay for state expenditure that does not produce bigger profits i.e. is a net drain on profits. So to restore profits the NACTs on behalf of the capitalist class want cut back on state spending by massive cuts in jobs and the social wage (the part of the wage made up state transfers benefits, pensions, Kiwisaver, health, education WFF etc) The budget deficit therefore is an excess of state spending over state income that is a net drain on profits. The balancing of the budget means reducing the state functions to only those that cannot be done more cheaply by the market. So we see the wholesale privatisation of state production, distribution and exchange (energy, airlines, banks etc) and services (health, housing, education, prisons etc). The capitalists kill two birds with one stone. First, state spending reduces the net drain on profits, and second, privatised state activities become directly profitable as the accumulation of capital (stocks, shares, interest etc). Our conclusion is that austerity is not merely a policy option like growth. The NACTs austerity policies are necessary for the capitalists survival, and they will not give up power or wealth without a fight. Thus liberal reforms are useless. Power has to be taken. It cannot be taken by peaceful means on the streets or other institutions. Radical reforms will come up against insuperable state power unless they take the form of a working class insurrection. Power has to be seized and the capitalist state power replaced by workers state power. For working class and the planet to survive the capitalist system must die.
May-June 2012
May-June 2012
10
May-June 2012
interests of workers in both countries to plan production to meet needs with the least necessary labour. Rather than be part of a TPPA that extracts value from the dependent nations for the benefit of a tiny class of exploiters offshore or at home, that forces worker migration to wealthier countries to be exploited by the bosses, and drags us into inter-imperialist wars, workers would decide how these resources are to be used and the income distributed. Those who say we are giving up on our national identity for some socialist pie in the sky need to reflect on what defending that identity is worth. Are they willing to die to defend their national identity in some new Gallipoli fought in other peoples lands to allow one imperialist state to rule over others? The working class has no country. Modern nations are inventions of capitalism to form a jurisdiction to protect their private property and profits. But nations long ago became barriers to capital accumulation so today bosses are internationalists. NZs ruling class are agents for international capital. They have no loyalty to NZ except as the bits of it they own as their share of the booty. But as the biggest bits are already owned by Australia, US, UK, Japan and China, to expropriate them we need to ally with the working class in all of those countries. We can build defensive fights in NZ but we cant win them without international working class support. For example, if we want to expropriate the Australian banks we will have to be in an alliance with Australian workers. It has nothing to do with the attitude of the bosses towards workers or the industrial law etc, its about the size, combativity and genuine internationalism of the working class. Thats why we need an international party of workers not only in the Pacific but the globe. When Greek, Icelandic, South American, South African and Pacific, Chinese and US workers unite their forces, and overthrow their ruling classes, no imperialist power on earth can stop the overthrow of capitalism and the creation of a global socialist economy that is under the control of workers democracy to produce to meet our needs in harmony with nature.
A Socialist Pacific
Aotearoa/NZ is a US semi-colony and is about to lose what little it has of its national independence. There is no possibility of stopping NZ being locked into the US imperialist Pacific zone of influence under the NACT regime. A Labour/Green government will find itself unwilling and unable to break out of this Pacific lockdown. There will be no national sovereignty remaining that any government can exercise to assert NZs national independence. NZ will be at the total mercy of US imperialism just as Greece is at the mercy of the EU today. There is only one way of breaking out of NZs semi-colonial dependence and that is completing the national revolution by struggling to take that revolution towards a socialist republic and a socialist Pacific. This will become clear as workers in all the Pacific countries face mounting economic austerity, political disenfranchisement and military domination. While fighting against imperialist control (e.g. TPPA) of the Pacific, it is important to realise that this applies to both the US and China. Instead of the workers of Aotearoa and other Pacific nationals being drawn into wars between the US and China they will discover that they will only be free when they are part of a Socialist Federation of the Pacific. http://redrave.blogspot.co.nz/2012/04/chinaredyellow-peril.html This will allow Aotearoa and Australia as well as the Pacific Island states to unite as one economy which is coordinated across the whole Pacific, but at the same time keep as much autonomy as is wanted to exercise political and cultural independence. For example Maori would have the right to assert their autonomy over ownership and control of traditional land and resources. Joining Aotearoa with Australia and the rest of the Pacific states on these terms recognises the common
For an Independent Socialist Aotearoa! For a Socialist United States of the Pacific! For a World Party of Socialist Revolution!
11
May-June 2012
12
May-June 2012
Therefore tendencies who prescribe this united front parliamentary government formula without describing the true direction the participating parties take are deluding the workers; and that's what we'll repeat until or unless they take the lead to organize workers councils and workers militias and make dual power a fact, preparing to sweep away the bourgeois state once and for all. It is compulsory to face the arrival of the time of the life-or-death struggle for power. This struggle is going to sort out those who think otherwise. Meanwhile the fascist "Golden Dawn" party is already organizing the ruined shopkeepers and racist skinheads who never had a job. They don't grow as a result of disillusion in New Democracy, who never did offer them anything. With significant support from the police Golden Dawn received 7% of the vote last month, and will also grow at social-democracy's expense, i.e., among those who had illusions to lose. Fascists know what they want and like their chances. The skinhead youth believe fascism offers them jobs, and in a country where the official youth unemployment rate is 51% (TIME April 19th 2012) this matters above all considerations. Workers Councils must form up and recognize the dangers for what they are. Workers Militias are needed to smash fascism in the egg! This organizing must begin in the workplace, among the students, immigrant workers and unemployed, and there isn't a moment to lose! A revolutionary party would bring a transitional program to the workers and youth to fight for demands that answer the crisis of capitalism. Such a party is needed to break the rank and file from the reformists, Stalinists and social-Democrats who hold back the creation of workers councils and workers militia! We will walk with you for SYRIZA through these polling places, but to do so is only to buy some high-priced time while you discover how matters truly stand. To smash fascism the advanced workers must also organize among the rank and file in the armed forces, which are truly enormous for a country with 2.5% of the European economy. Enlisted personnel need unions and workers councils of their own! So that fascists will not be able to put them up to a civil war for the benefit of imperialist banks and now also Chinese imperialism which just bought the Greek port at Piraeus and bans all trade union activity there! Soldiers, sailors, airmen and veterans need to arm and train the workers militias so that the police cannot shepherd the growth of the fascist street gangs and lead them against the workers. Workers in uniform know or will soon discover that the fascist punk and his racist police protector are no supermen.
May-June 2012
14
May-June 2012
to sectarian divisions in the resistance. Of course we would argue that reality has already proven that a peaceful, unarmed revolution is impossible. At the same time we must also oppose any military support for the Assad regime by the other imperialist camp Russia and China. Like in Libya and Kaddafi we cannot support a military alliance with Assad against a US/NATO intervention if, first; Assad continues to kill the resistance fighters, and second; Assad is being armed and supported by Russia/China. Our position must be for the armed independence of the resistance fighters from any Syrian bourgeois forces; for the defeat of the Assad regime; for a united opposition to form a national popular militia; for the defeat of imperialism; for the creation of a provisional government based on the delegates of all the opposition forces who are active in the resistance. While the revolutionary left is almost non-existent in Syria, it is necessary for Trotskyist-Leninists who have comrades in Syria or the other Arab states in the region to unite their forces around Trotskys Permanent Revolution. This means actively raising the Transitional Program inside the resistance to convince the revolutionary fighters that even the most basic democratic tasks, such as freedom of assembly, selfdefence, political democracy, womens rights, youth rights, for a non-sectarian republic, for re-distribution of land to the small farmers, etc., means we must fight for workers councils, workers militias, a national assembly of councils, a Workers and Peasants Government and a socialist revolution. For the completion of the democratic revolution as a permanent revolution for a Syrian Socialist Republic in a Federation of Socialist Republics in the Middle East! First published in Revolutionary Worker, paper of the Revolutionary Workers Group of Zimbabwe.
15
May-June 2012
Defend Marxism
While the economic conditions for socialism exist today, standing between the working class and socialism are political, social and cultural barriers. They are the capitalist state and bourgeois ideology and its agents. These agents claim that Marxism is dead and capitalism need not be exploitative. We say that Marxism is a living science that explains both capitalisms continued exploitation and its attempts to hide class exploitation behind the appearance of individual "freedom" and "equality". It reveals how and why the reformist, Stalinist and centrist misleaders of the working class tie workers to bourgeois ideas of nationalism, racism, sexism and equality. Such false beliefs will be exploded when the struggle against the inequality, injustice, anarchy and barbarism of capitalism in crisis, led by a revolutionary Marxist party, produces a revolutionary class-consciousness.
Communist Workers Group of New Zealand/Aotearoa, in a Liaison Committee with Humanist Workers for Revolutionary Socialism
Online http://redrave.blogspot.com Phone 0064 027280008 Email cwg006@yahoo.com Archive http://communistworker.blogspot.com/
16