The Theory of Nothingness

by Dr. Mary Walker According to the law of causality every effect, such as the collapse of a building, must have had a cause, such as an earthquake, which in turn must have had a cause, such as magma convection, and so on. Consequently, even if we trace our history back over an infinite number of causal interactions, an infinite more would still precede them, so no matter how many causal interactions took place modern day events would never come to be, yet here we are; this is known as the paradox of causality. The most obvious solution is to simply assume that the law of causality was broken, in which case a finite number of causal interactions transpired between the initial cause and current events. However, this assumption can never be proven, for a causeless event has no explanation. Like with many paradoxes, such as the twin paradox, the solution requires multiple perspectives. That is, from a perspective outside reality looking in absolutely nothing has or will exist, so the law of causality was never broken because it was never put to the test. However, if absolutely nothing exists then theres nothing to cause one equally valid form of nothingness (ex. 0) to be favored over another (ex. 1 + -1 = 0), for such a cause would require a cause and so on, re-creating the paradox of causality. This can be visualized on a piece of paper by surrounding a 0 with equations resulting in 0 (ex. 1 + 1), then covering up everything but the 0, in which case it would be impossible for somebody to determine, or even detect, the equations. In reality, imaginary numbers, multiple dimensions and the like allow for extremely complex expressions of nothingness, the most important consequence of which is that they cannot all be expressed simultaneously (while still equating to zero), so they must democratically share reality by equally and instantly negating each others changes. For example, non-zero sub-equations (ex. 3 + 4) can result in zero only when combined with a negating sub-equation (ex. 6 + -5), but since this excludes other sub-equations (ex. 3 + -4 excludes 5 + -5), they must share reality by equally and instantly negating each others changes [ex. (3 + -4) + (6 + -5) to (4 + -4) + (5 + -5)]; for as already stated, in order to avoid the paradox of causality there can be nothing that causes one to be favored over another. In conclusion, the inevitable consequence of absolutely nothing existing is that theres nothing to cause one equally valid form of nothingness, mathematical or otherwise, to be prevented or selected over another (assuming that they cannot be discerned from a perspective outside reality looking in); consequently, they must all exist, but since they cannot all be expressed simultaneously (while still equating to zero) they must share reality by equally and instantly negating each others changes, hence our changing universe. This Theory of Nothingness does far more than provide a solution to the paradox of causality, for it makes testable predictions that can be disproved. That is, all changes within our universe (including any interacting universes), MUST be instantly negated, and when combined, MUST equate to zero. The laws of physics overwhelmingly support this theory, which is amazing considering that we can imagine an infinite number of physical laws that blatantly contradict it, such as any law without symmetry. For example, the decay of a particle is instantly and equally negated by the creation of new particles and/or energies. Other examples include the laws of thermodynamics & Newtonian physics (ex. equal and opposite reactions).