A glance at The Aunt Tamara File

By Adrian Nastase, political inmate

http://www.zambacciancode.ro/?p=71

Prologue
_____________________________________________________________________________

First the DNA leaked to the press that Aunt Tamara never existed, and was only a fiction invented to hide a conspiracy through which Adrian Nastase obtained a large sum of money, allegedly through illegal means.
_____________________________________________________________________________

In 2006 DNA swamped the country with disinformation, libel and lies desperately trying to incriminate Adrian Nastase.
_____________________________________________________________________________

But then they realized that it is evident that the late Ms. Tamara Cernasov, the aunt of Mrs. Dana Nastase, indeed gave that money as her bequest to her niece, all in due process, absolutely legally and totally transparent.
_____________________________________________________________________________

But Traian Basescu never gives up when persecuting his legitimate political opponents. So then, his people invented an outrageous story, that Adrian Nastase stole that Aunt Tamara File file from the Anti Money Laundry Agency (ONPCB).
_____________________________________________________________________________

But that too does not make any sense since that file was closed and cleared of any wrong doing already six years earlier, in 2000, even before Adrian Nastase was elected Prime-Minister.

_____________________________________________________________________________

But as always, Basescu and his Chief DNA Prosecutor Daniel Morar did not let the facts confuse them, in their obsession to convict Adrian Nastase at all cost.
_____________________________________________________________________________

So while systematically providing the public with leaked disinformation & lies, they launched an unprecedented campaign of blackmail and deception this time trying to mislead even The Supreme Court of Justice.
_____________________________________________________________________________

Here is only one amazing anecdote which uncovers the means and methods used by Traian Basescu and Daniel Morar, in their hunting journey of obstructing justice:

The anatomy of extorcion & forging of evidence by DNA

_____________________________________________________________________________

DNA prosecutors extorted a convicted criminal, promising to free him from prison if he told the lies dictated to him, and helped convict Adrian Nastase on false pretence
January 19, 2006. Genica Boierica, a convicted criminal, serving the first of an eight years sentence in the Craiova Prison, was brought to the DNA central headquarter in Bucharest. DNA prosecutors promised to free him from prison if he helped incriminate Adrian Nastase on false pretence.

_____________________________________________________________________________

The imaginary tale signed by a convicted criminal fabricated and imposed by the DNA
After a short persuasion, Genica Boierica signed his fantastic written statement, authored and imposed by prosecutors: A. He claimed that right before the 2000 national elections, his neighbor, Mr. Ioan Melinescu, a senior official in the Anti Money Laundry Agency at that time, allegedly told him about the existence of a Dana Nastase File in the agency, and that he knew of an intention to leak this file to the press in order to jeopardize Nastases effort in winning the 2000 Elections. Allegedly, Melinescu asked Boierica to arrange for him a meeting with Mr. Ristea Priboi, Member of Parliament from Nastases party, so he could forward the information to Adrian Nastase. Facts which were clarified in Court later:

At that time, Ioan Melinescu and Ristea Priboi were neighbors and acquaintances for almost 40 years, so they would not have needed the help of Genica Boierica or any other third person to arrange a meeting with each other.

B. According to Genica Boiericas testimony, he arranged that meeting between Ristea Priboi and Ioan Melinescu, in November 2000 at the Parliament Palace, in which he too participated. On that same day, as the Prosecutions witness claimed, all three of them allegedly met Adrian Nastase, and Melinsecu supposedly promised Nastase to stop the investigation in return for being nominated as the new head of the Anti Money Laundry Agency, soon after Nastase won the elections. Facts which were clarified in court later:

The security records of Parliament Palace prove that Boierica and Melinescu did not enter the Parliament Palace at any time during November 2000, not before and not after. Furthermore, records show that both MP Ristea Priboi and MP Adrian Nastase were not in the Parliament Palace throughout November, as this was last month of the campaign and they were on the campaign trail all over the country. Also, it became evident that Boierica never visited the venues of the alleged meetings, since in court he pointed out wrong locations of the offices he claimed he visited. Both Mr. Ioan Melinescu and Mr. Ristea Priboi, testified that such a chain of events never happened, and that they could not be and were not in the Parliament Palace at that time. None of the staff members of either Nastases office and Pribois office recognized Melinescu nor Boierica. The Anti Money Laundry Agency (ONPCSB), conducted a regular inquiry into this business transaction, and closed the file after everything was clarified and cleared of any wrong-doing already in 2000, when Nastase was still leading an opposition party.

C. According to Genica Boiericas fairy-tale, on December 31, 2000, soon after Nastase won the elections and became Prime Minister he (Boierica) met Ristea Priboi at the Billa Store in the city of Craiova, and Priboi reported that everything is arranged, and now Malinescu will get the nomination.

Facts which were clarified in Court later:

Billa Store did not even exist at that time. It was built and opened exactly one year later. Mr. Ristea Priboi denied that any meeting with Genica Boiericas ever took place. Records show that on that day he was away with his family for the holiday season.

D. DNAs key witness continues his statement: In March of 2001, recently nominated new head of the Anti Money Laundry Agency, Ioan Melinescu, allegedly asked Genica Boiericas to pick him up with his own car, from the back side of the headquarter building of the Anti Money Laundry Agency, so nobody can see them. According to his story, they drove together to meet Ristea Priboi in Parliament, where Malinescu supposedly handed him the dossier with the Nastase file, asking him to later give it to Prime Minister Nastase, and Priboi put it in his filling cabinet. Facts which were clarified in Court later:

If the head of the Governments Anti Money Laundry Agency, allegedly wanted to give something to Prime Minister Nastase, at the latters request wouldnt he do it directly?!?! Why would anybody conduct such a confidential transaction in such an improvised and unsecured way!?!?! Furthermore, security records show that the first time Mr. Ioan Melinescu entered the Parliament Palace was long after, in the summer of 2001, for official meetings.

E. Genica Boierica concludes his testimony by claiming that Ioan Melinescu promised at the end of that meeting that he would make sure that the entire file will be erased from the computerized data base of the Anti Money Laundry Agency. Facts which were clarified in Court later:

Both the Director of the bank (in which Tamara Cernasov and her niece Dana Nastase opened the joint account in 1999), and employees of the Anti Money Laundry Agency, testified in writing and during the hearings that the file was recorded and still exists in the electronic archives of the Anti Money Laundry Agency. Also, the original Bank data, which the file is made up of is safe & secured in the banks records up to date. In other words nobody in his clear mind would think he can hide the information by stealing the hardcopy of the file. And nobody in his clear mind can think that by trying to erase electronically recorded files in the Anti Money Laundry Agency he can make the data disappear, since everybody knows that the records still exist in the bank.

Furthermore:

5 years after it was allegedly stolen & destroyed by Adrian Nastase the file surprisingly reappeared, when DNA leaked it to the press

Genica Boierica signed his statement at the headquarter of DNA, on January 19, 2006 in which he claimed that the Nastase file in the Anti Money Laundry Agency was allegedly stolen and destroyed no later than March 2001.

But a few days before Boierica signed this statement, on January 9-15 2006, this allegedly stolen & destroyed file reappeared in public. It was Evenimentul Zilei, a newspaper known to be the most decisive loyal propaganda channel of President Traian Basescu and his party that published a series of exclusive news items, including leaked copies from the original 2000 Anti Money Laundry Agencys Nastase file which according to DNAs fabricated story were allegedly destroyed 5 years earlier. Through false pretence of objective reporting, the newspaper claimed that the money reported in that file did not come from Ms. Tamara Cernasov (Aunt Tamara), but from bribery dealings of Adrian Nastase. Evenimentul Zilei totally ignored the fact that the file it was reporting about, was totally cleared of any wrong doing by the Anti Money Laundry Agency in 2000, even before Adrian Nastase and his party came to power. DNA prosecutors, who are known for leaking disinformation and slander against political opponents of Traian Basescu failed to explain and refused to investigate how a file which was allegedly stolen and destroyed by Adrian Nastase in early 2001 reappeared 5 years later, in January 2006, in Evenimentul Zilei.

and more circumstantial evidence: As presented in court later, it was evident and very well known to the prosecutors at all the time:

It was Adrian Nastase himself, upon his own free initiative, who declared in early 2000 his wifes joint account with her aunt, the late Ms. Tamara Cernasov, including the source of that money in that account. Furthermore, already in 2000, when Adrian Nastase was still in opposition, the Anti Money Laundry Agency (ONPCB), conducted a regular inquiry into the business transaction which was the source of the money in that bank account, and closed the file after everything was clarified and cleared of any wrong-doing. Under these circumstances, Adrian Nastase had no interest whatsoever to hide and remove that file from the official state records. On the contrary it was his interest that they are public and totally transparent to all. Only the DNA which desperately tried to fabricate a conviction based on a false story, would be engaged in an attempt to hide the truth which cleared Adrian Nastase of any wrong doing, and stir an ocean of confusing disinformation, fabricated stories, lies & slander in an attempt to incriminate Nastase at all cost.

_____________________________________________________________________________

DNA opened a criminal file against Adrian Nastase, based on a totally fabricated testimony its own prosecutors extorted from a convicted criminal. In return the criminal was freed from prison.
Soon after Genica Boierica signed the testimony extorted from him by DNA prosecutors, in which he was accusing Adrian Nastase with the above baseless accusations he was set free from prison. Hours afterwards, Based upon Genica Boierica fabricated testimony imposed by prosecutor Mariana Alexandru the DNA opened a criminal file against former Prime Minister Ardrian Nastase, Ioan Melinescu and Ristea Priboi.

May 24, 2006. Adrian Nastase, Ioan Melinescu and Restea Priboi were officialy charged by DNA for their alleged involvement is the story given by Genica Boierica.

_____________________________________________________________________________

The Supreme Court of Justice totally acquitted Adrian Nastase and the other defendants, uncovering the conspiracy & deception of DNA
December 15, 2011. In its verdict, after 34 sessions, the Supreme Court announced that Adrian Nastase and the other two defendants are not guilty of any of the charges presented by the DNA, while formally uncovering the mask of deception and fraud by DNA.

_____________________________________________________________________________

DNA prosecutors lied to the Supreme Court

In its sentence, the Supreme Court elaborated on the following:

1. The prime witness of the prosecution, Genica Boierica on whom the prosecution based
its entire case was serving a prison sentence as a convicted criminal at the time of signing his declaration, and was clearly identified as lying during a polygraph test conducted by the prosecution in 2007. The Supreme Court called attention to the fact that in total contradiction to the above fact the prosecution lied in its condemnation papers submitted to the court, when it claimed that the key witness, Genica Boierica, was detected speaking the truth in that Polygraph test. On the contrary, the Court showed that the official Polygraph Report proved that Genica Boierica was lying. It was also proven that Genica Boierica was even personally informed by the technical officer who conducted the Polygraph test, that he was detected lying. The only 2 other witnesses summoned by the prosecutors, Genica Boiericas mistress and his personal driver, only knew the story that Boierica told them, and explained that they were under great pressure of the prosecution to testify. It is evident that the alleged meeting between Adrian Nastase, Ioan Melinescu, Ristea Priboi and Genica Boierica never took place. The nomination of Mr. Ioan Melinescu as Director of the Anti Money Laundry Agency in December of 2000, was conducted strictly through due legal and administrative process. The official appeal for this strictly professional nomination was signed by the Finance Minister, the Justice Minister and the General Secretary of the Government, and approved by the entire Government. It was evident that there was no personal interest for Adrian Nastase in that nomination. The conclusions of the Prosecution were contradicted by the facts which were unveiled in court. There were no evidences to prove the Prosecutions claims. Adrian Nastases position, that he had no interest in getting or stealing or destroying an Anti Money Laundry Agency file which was closed and cleared as early as 2000 and therefore was not of any concern to him or to his family was proven justified.

2.

3. 4. 5.

6. 7.

8. The facts show that Mr. Ioan Melinescu could not and did not take any file from Anti
Money Laundry Agency nor eliminate any such item from the agencys records.

9. The Supreme Court totally acquited Adrian Nastase, Ion Melinescu and Ristea
Priboi from all charges.