325 views

Uploaded by Sebastiao Silveira

- Chapter18 Beam Subjected to Torsion & Bending II
- Cellular Beams
- Design Concept for Jib Crane
- Building Designer Engineer's Handbook
- Castellated Beam Design Conformation and Examples
- Technical Note Torsional Analysis of Steel Sections[1]
- Torsional Analysis
- ACI-SP-4 Formwork for Concrete
- Bondek Design & Construct Manual
- Tekla Structures 19 - Civil Engineering Community
- Pad Footing Design
- Autodesk Inventor - Stress Analysis Contacts
- Pages From AISC ASD Manual 9th Edition
- As NZS 4600-2005 Cold-Formed Steel Structures
- AISC Design Guide 09 - Torsional Analysis of Structural Steel Members - Errata
- Zick Analysis
- bulk solids handling
- SAP2000 Tutorial Temperature Loading
- Civil
- AASHTO-Lrfd-2014-CSiBridge.pdf

You are on page 1of 6

Preface: Structural analysis of steel members requires the engineer to assess the need for a torsional analysis. If resultant loads applied to a member pass through the shear center of the shape, then torsional loads may be ignored. However, if any eccentric loads are applied, torsion must be considered. Torsion on closed shapes is relatively simple and straightforward. Analysis of open sections, such as I-beams (W shapes, etc.) and channels requires a slightly more complicated review. The structural engineer typically designs steel members to be loaded such that torsion is not a concern. Eccentric loads are typically avoided. Typical industrial facilities will attach loads to the structural members that result in unforeseen torsion loads. Many cases, the designers of the attachments dont address the original design loads on the structural member to which they attach. For example, when designing a power plant piping system, supports for the piping and equipment are typically attached to structural members. Pipe supports that are cantilevered from the structural members will result in torsion on the member. Support designers typically assume the structural member is a rigid point at which to start their design. Structural designers may not be aware of the equipment loads later imposed upon their design. Depending on the piping or equipment loads, the torsional loads may not be insignificant. Likewise the structural designer may ignore small eccentricities in applied loads (i.e., loads only offset a few inches from the shear center) assuming torsion is not significant with only small moment arms. However, large loads as small moment arms could still produce significant torsional loads on the beam. In straight beam sections, the torsional loads are typically added to the bending loads. For structural members that are already close to allowable limits, addition of torsional stresses may result in exceeding design allowable limits. In some cases, the stresses may be acceptable while the deflections are unacceptable. This could be the case where the deflecting beam may affect walkways or equipment supported by the beam. Therefore structural designers and support designers both must be aware of the potential for torsional stresses on their designs. Any engineer that is evaluating beam stresses and deflections must also consider the impact of any torsional loads imposed upon their designs. Torsional Loads: Rotation: A member undergoing torsion will rotate about its shear center through an angle of as measured from each end of the member. This rotational displacement function, , and its derivatives with respect to member length are used to determine the torsional stresses of the member.

Fig. 1: Rotated Section Warping: Torsion on a member will result in the cross section rotating a given amount. Noncircular sections will also experience warping of the cross section. In an I-beam (W shape, etc.) this can be seen as one corner of the upper flange warping out of the plane of the cross section, while the other corner of the same flange warps into the plane of the cross section. The top flange will warp opposite of the bottom flange (see Figure 2)

In addition to circular cross sections, this warping will not occur on sections where the section is composed of plates and the centerline of the members forming the shape meet at a common point. For example, a structural Tee is composed of two plate elements where their centerlines meet at a common point. A tee will not experience the warping that the above I beam will. The warping stresses of the member are obviously dependent upon any restraint of the cross sections ability to deflect. Torsional Stresses:

The stresses induced on a member as a result of torsion may be classified into three categories. Torsional shear stress, Warping Shear stress and Warping normal stress. Pure torsional shear stress: These stresses act in a direction that is parallel to the edges of the particular shape's elements. These stresses vary linearly across the thickness of the element. For a given shape, the pure torsional shear stress is greatest in the thickest element. The behavior of the stress can be conceptualized by assuming a thin membrane is attached to the cross section of the member. If the membrane is attached to the edges of the cross section and pressurized between the structural member and membrane, the membrane would bulge outward from the cross section. The slope of the bulging membrane at any point along the surface is proportional to the torsional shear stress at that location. The direction of these stresses is tangent to the shape of the bulging membrane. The maximum torsional shear stress for the cross section can be determined from the equation: t = Gt ' Where G is the shear modulus, t is the element thickness and ' is the first derivative of the rotational displacement function. The shear stresses will act as shown in figure 3:

Warping Shear Stresses When the member is restrained such that the cross section cannot warp freely, warping stresses will be induced. This includes warping shear stresses as well as warping normal stresses. Warping shear stresses act in a direction that is parallel to the edges of the particular shape's elements. These stresses are constant across the thickness of the element and vary along the length of the element. The equation for calculating Warping Shear Stress is: w = (-ESw '')/t

Where E is Young's modulus, Sw is the warping statical moment at a point on the cross section, t is the element thickness and '' is the second derivative of the rotational displacement function. The distribution of these stresses are shown in figure 4:

Warping Normal Stresses: Warping Normal Stresses are direct tension and compression stresses resulting from bending of the element due to torsion. These stresses act perpendicular to the surface of the cross section. They are constant across the thickness of an element of the cross section, but vary in magnitude along the length of the element. These stresses are determined by: w = EWns ''' Where E is Young's Modulus, Wns is the normalized warping constant at a point s on the cross section, and ''' is the third derivative of the rotational displacement function. The tension and compression warping normal stresses are depicted in figure 5.

Treatment of Torsional Stresses: As shown in figures 3 through 5, the stresses will add directly to the bending and shear stresses already imparted to a member. The warping normal stresses act in the direction of bending stresses. The maximum normal/bending stress for an I-beam will therefore be the sum of the maximum warping normal stress and bending stress. The shear stresses will likewise add to the existing shear stresses of the member. Since this is a direct addition to existing design stresses of a member, it is easy to see how an already highly loaded member may exceed allowable stress limits when torsion is applied. Torsional Constant-a common error: J is used to describe the torsional constant. Unfortunately, this same variable is used to describe the polar moment of inertia of a shape. These are NOT the same thing. To add to the confusion, in the case of a circular member they are numerically equal. With other shapes, severe miscalculations result when the polar moment of inertia is used as the torsional constant. The polar moment of inertia is the sum of the X and Y moments of inertia. For an I-beam the torsional constant is equal to:

Where t is the element thickness. For a W8x24, the polar moment of inertia is approximately 101 in4 whereas the torsional constant is only 0.35 in4. Since is inversely proportional to J, this error could result in grossly under-calculating the stress. Evaluation of stresses: The torsional stresses are all a function of the rotational displacement function and its various derivatives. The function is dependent upon the type of loading as well as the end conditions of the beam. AISC has compiled a series of tables to determine the various rotational functions and their derivatives for 12 load cases. Using the AISC tables (ref. Torsional Analysis of Steel Members, AISC 1983 edition). The procedure for determining stresses is as follows: Identify the member loading and end conditions in relation to load cases 1 through 12. 1. Identify member length. 2. Determine (point of load application divided by beam length) for the desired load case. 3. With Load case and , enter the tables for the closest value. Interpolate between tables as necessary. 4. From the tables the three derivatives of the rotational function are known at a point along the length of the beam as a function of J, G and the imposed load. Stresses may now be calculated at the point of interest along the beam.

This method requires the user to first identify where the stresses will be of greatest concern. The rotational derivatives (thus the associated stresses) are not necessarily a maximum value at the same point along the length of the beam. This process could include numerous tedious iterations to determine the high stress and perform necessary interpolations between charts provided for cardinal values of .

- Chapter18 Beam Subjected to Torsion & Bending IIUploaded byVincent Teng
- Cellular BeamsUploaded byStephen Hicks
- Design Concept for Jib CraneUploaded byvish5610
- Building Designer Engineer's HandbookUploaded byRamilArtates
- Castellated Beam Design Conformation and ExamplesUploaded byAlexandru Stefan Both
- Technical Note Torsional Analysis of Steel Sections[1]Uploaded bykidseismic
- Torsional AnalysisUploaded bycrozet_d6989
- ACI-SP-4 Formwork for ConcreteUploaded byDaniel Duarte
- Bondek Design & Construct ManualUploaded byAkuma.Gokai7328
- Tekla Structures 19 - Civil Engineering CommunityUploaded bynavedce2578
- Pad Footing DesignUploaded byMalayan Tiger
- Autodesk Inventor - Stress Analysis ContactsUploaded byNdianabasi Udonkang
- Pages From AISC ASD Manual 9th EditionUploaded byamin tariq
- As NZS 4600-2005 Cold-Formed Steel StructuresUploaded bySAI Global - APAC
- AISC Design Guide 09 - Torsional Analysis of Structural Steel Members - ErrataUploaded byslowrainandfastbird
- Zick AnalysisUploaded byrksahay
- bulk solids handlingUploaded byDr_M_Soliman
- SAP2000 Tutorial Temperature LoadingUploaded byBabagenral
- CivilUploaded byAndualem Serbada
- AASHTO-Lrfd-2014-CSiBridge.pdfUploaded byRaul Bedoya Heredia
- Los Angeles Abrasion TestUploaded byAisyah Ibrahim
- Steel Design - Tradeoff on Structural System, Excel ProgramUploaded byEmmanuel Lazo
- Cone Xi Ones a Momento Entre Vigas de Acero y Columnas de Concreto (EXTRAIDO PDF)Uploaded byAlexander Rueda Cascone
- Fluid Power ManualUploaded byChris Doherty
- CIVIL ENGINEERING REFERENCE BOOKUploaded byenggakter
- StiffenerUploaded byAdigwe George Chima
- Axis Vm Step by StepUploaded byBelak1
- Steel DesignUploaded bySheena Tiffany Zurbito Escaña
- Modern Structural AnalysisUploaded bywalter_m_cdr
- Solid Flow in BinUploaded bynaniturk

- 4cbt-Sebastião Silva Da Silveira-Versão FinalUploaded bySebastiao Silveira
- Apresentação 4CBT - 2017 - Rev_0Uploaded bySebastiao Silveira
- Vivare Turu[1]Uploaded bySebastiao Silveira
- Palestra CBPE - 2016 - rev_0.pdfUploaded bySebastiao Silveira
- Palestra CBPE - 2016 - rev_0.pdfUploaded bySebastiao Silveira
- Projeto Estrutural de Blocos Sobre EstacasUploaded byzejuan
- caixas_de_areiaUploaded bySebastiao Silveira
- Tabela_Comprimento_AncoragemUploaded bySebastiao Silveira
- Dissertação - Dimensionamento de Vigas de Concreto Armado Reforçadas Com Chapas Coldas Com Resina Epóxi - Sebastião S. Da Silveira - Universidade Federal Fluminense - 1997Uploaded bySebastiao Silveira

- 3 Vacuum Basic ConceptsUploaded byapi-3856548
- Theory of Elasticity & Plasticity by Dr. D. Dinev.pdfUploaded bySounak Sasmal
- 11 Chemistry Tp DemoUploaded byKritika Bahl
- Centrifugal and axial pump design and off-design performance predictionUploaded bykandahar_spec
- Podolny Something Called NothingUploaded byalexander de carvalho
- ch03 Pure SubstanceUploaded byrollrams
- chem1040_w16Uploaded byjason12
- w1bookUploaded byzuzumumba
- Dynamics - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaUploaded byJay Srivastava
- IEEE 1291-1993 (R2005) - Guide for Partial Discharge Measurement in Power SwitchgearUploaded byQuiroa, Antonio J
- JohnBrooks-Gearbox-Catalog.pdfUploaded byRELOJERIA
- Design and Simulation of Speed Control of DC Motor using ChopperUploaded byIJIRST
- Ap12 Frq ChemistryUploaded byfaceybabe
- Basic Atomic and Molecular SpectroscopyUploaded bygajanan78
- Aashto Lrfd Railway FlyoverUploaded byShaileshRastogi
- ElectrostaticsUploaded byrajatiitd
- gases - quizUploaded byapi-393155483
- CBSE XII Sample PaperUploaded byshrutigupt
- Potential Difference ProblemsUploaded bysimonatics08
- Betavoltaic-Article.pdfUploaded byTop Secret Antigravity Technology
- Pde Solve FdmUploaded bySaikatBiswas
- 08Honors Physics - Projectile MotionUploaded byelatos1234
- RF CalculatorsUploaded bynicofta
- Tecnotion Ironless Vacuum BrochureUploaded byElectromate
- IAS Mains Mathematics 2014Uploaded byviswanath
- Motion Through the Ether Silvertooth, E. W.Uploaded bycbertin
- FXL-1480Uploaded byKikafunda
- communication systemUploaded byKenneth Lim Yoong Kang
- Crisfield M.a. Vol.1. Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures.. Essentials (Wiley_1996)(ISBN 047197059X)(360s)Uploaded byVinh Duong
- 1.docxUploaded bybesmir beqiri