Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
cenSEI
: . +
8KVUXZ
CONTENTS BUSINESS NATION WORLD TECHNOLOGY HEALTH/LIFESTYLE
Making Every Filipino Vote Count
With PCOS machines back
in harness, Comelec and the
citizenry must join hands to
ensure the peoples will wins
With the Supreme Court decision allowing
the Commission on Elections to buy all
82,200 Precinct Count Optical Scan (PCOS)
machines used in the 2010 elections, the
effort to safeguard election integrity shifts
to both the Comelec and the citizenry,
including election workers of political
groups, joining hands to institute and
implement iron-clad mechanisms against
computerized fraud.
In this two-part article, The CenSEI Report
reviews the technology, procedures and
2010 performance of the PCOS automated
election system (AES), then expounds on
recommended measures to help safeguard
the integrity of elections using the voting,
counting and canvassing technology and
process. TIIs hrsL purL wIII Iocus on Iow
well or not so well PCOS-AES did in 2010.
Right from the start, the election
automation project was fraught with
problems. It began two decades ago when
then Comelec Chairman Christian Monsod
made it part of his election modernization
program, as an ABS-CBN timeline recounts.
In 1994 the Commission was ready to bid
out an automation project, but Congress
failed to pass a law mandating AES. RA
8436 was passed in December 1997, for
national elections the following year, but
the 1998 voting and counting were again
manual (see The Long Road to Election
Automation graphic on page 16).
n Ier hrsL State of the Nation Address
in 2001, Gloria Arroyo declared election
STRATEGY POINTS
In reusing the PCOS automated election
system, top priority is addressing its
weaknesses and failings laid bare in the
2010 polls
Safeguards and procedures were sidestepped
in last elections. Without them, it would be
better to go back to manual counting
Election software manipulation happens even
in advanced nations. Unless it can be stopped,
automated polls are not secure
By Ricardo Saludo
PCOS voting and counting, outlined by former Comelec Commissioner Augusto Lagman
PREVIOUS PAGE NEXT PAGE
19
:NKcenSEI8KVUXZ - July 2-8, 2012
in March last year, looked closely at how
the system and its countless procedures
and safeguards complied with provisions
of the 2007 election automation law, as
well as upright voting and canvassing
standards. Contingency and failure
measures were also explained, as well as
the crucial random manual
uudILs In hve precIncLs per
district needed to check if
the system worked.
The Consortium on
Electoral Reforms, under
election advocate Ramon
Casiple of the Institute
for Political and Electoral
Reforms, undertook its own
monitoring and assessment
program, Bantay Eleksyon
2010, with assistance from
the EU, U.S. Agency for
International Development
(USAID), the U.N.
Democracy Fund, and the
International Foundation
for Electoral Systems.
CER`s hnuI reporL,
Successful Automated
Election System Leads to
an Essentially Fair and
Free 2010 Philippine
Elections, provided a
comprehensive analysis
and reporting of PCOS as
designed and in action,
plus the historical,
legislative, political and
procurement aspects
of AES and the 2010
elections.
The CER report detailed
problems in various areas:
failure of elections in certain areas, some
ballot rejection, absence of secrecy folders,
the use of different kinds of thermal paper
and ballots, a citizens watchdog report of
7,500 PCOS machines failing to transmit
results (almost one-tenth of the total),
and nearly 800 incidents involving the