Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction and History of Tribology Jost-Commission (1966) in England TRIBOLOGY - Friction - Wear - Lubrication = rubbing = knowledge
ancient greek
economical losses by wear ~ 1-4% of gross national product ~ 10% of primary energy is lost by friction and wear within Germany (direct and indirect costs) 1975 1983 2002 2,5 Billion 5 Billion (of this 1,1 billion in steel industry) 40 Billion
direct costs - new parts - regeneration of worn parts indirect costs - interruption of production - costs of maintanance - storekeeping add. costs - more expensive production - decrease of quality - decrease of productivity - loss of market shares
Introduction and History 3 uni-due..de/wt Universitt Duisburg-Essen Lotharstr 1, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
History of Tribology predominately friction recorded since ever - e.g. to make fire Egyptians, Sumerians (3500-35 A.C.) - leather as bearing material for rolls and wheels - stone transport on wooden rails with lubrication by oil, grease, water - roller bearings since about 330 A.C. in Greece
Introduction and History 4 uni-due..de/wt Universitt Duisburg-Essen Lotharstr 1, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
Sliding bearing
03136_igel
03135_igel
Leonardo da Vinci, Italy (1452-1519) - wear path of his cranes was following the steady load vector
(03137)
Leonardo da Vinci, Italy (1452-1519) - ball bearings for large doors and cranes
Coulomb-Amontons laws of friction: should be named da Vinci-Amontons-Coulomb laws of friction 1) 2) 3) 4) the friction force depends on the normal force the friction force is independant of the nominal contact area static friction is smaller than dynamic friction the friction force is independant of the relative speed
2) + 4) are wrong
E = equivalent Youngs Modulus of Body 1 and Body 2 1,2 = Poissons ratio of body 1 and 2 R = equivalent radius; substitutes two spheres by one sphere and one flat if is the same for both bodies
E =
2 E1 E 2 E1 + E 2
1 1 1 = + R R1 R 2
Notice: With different radii of the two bodies in different directions the formulas become more complicated!
c=
3 4 + 8 1 2
t ,max =
1 2 FN (1 + c) 2 a 2
Richard Stribeck, Germany (1861-1950) - Influence of surface roughness and lubrication on friction
= ad + def + lub
within vacuum = 10 in air = 0.5 in oil = 0.001
Richard Stribeck, Germany (1861-1950) - Influence of surface roughness and lubrication on friction
= ad + def + lub = 0 + C S + (1 ) 1 1 S 0
= fraction of real area of contact C = probability of ploughing 0 = shear strength of adhesive bond, 0 = contact stress within adhesive contact s = shear strength of material, s = contact stress within roughness 1 = shear strength of lubricant; similar to viscosity, 1 = pressure within lubricant
Introduction and History 19 uni-due..de/wt Universitt Duisburg-Essen Lotharstr 1, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
Richard Stribeck, Germany (1861-1950) - Influence of surface roughness and lubrication on friction
10
Predominatly investigated until 1920s - sliding friction - rolling friction - lubrication Wear is investigated since the 1930s e.g. Holm, wear of electrical contacts except for one thing
MONEY
Introduction and History 22 uni-due..de/wt Universitt Duisburg-Essen Lotharstr 1, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
11
- Results
- pure Au wears faster than alloyed Cu or Ag - the softer metal wear faster than the harder one - materials transfer from the softer to the harder - Cu vs. Cu show higher wear than non-self-mating contact materials - sand or metal chips increase wear with increasing ductility of coin materials
12