Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Source: http://sergeicartoons.blogs.sapo.pt/arquivo/Global-warming.jpg
An Inconvenient Truth
Must See:
An Inconvenient Truth (Video). URL: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2078944470709189270&q=%22Inconvenient+truth%22&hl=en Futurama explains Global Warming - as used in An Inconvenient Truth - Google Video. URL: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7826207674342179094&q=%22global+warming%22&hl=en Climate Crises (site): http://www.climatecrisis.net/
Source: http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Predictions_of_Future_Change_Gallery
Source: http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Predictions_of_Future_Change_Gallery
Source: http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Predictions_of_Future_Change_Gallery
Source: http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Predictions_of_Future_Change_Gallery
Source: http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Predictions_of_Future_Change_Gallery
4. What Is Not an Argument? 8. Writing Arguments 5. Deduction & Induction 7. Evaluating Arguments
6. Analyzing Arguments
When asked how World War III would be fought, Einstein replied that he didn't know. But he knew how World War IV would be fought: With sticks and stones!
Remember!
Before we can effectively analyze and evaluate an argument, we need to understand clearly what kind of argument is being offered.
Argument 2 All of Yasmin Ahmads movies have been good. Therefore, Yasmin Ahmads next movie will probably be good.
Types of Arguments: Deductive arguments are arguments in which the conclusion is claimed or intended to follow necessarily from the premises. Inductive arguments are arguments in which the conclusion is claimed or intended to follow probably from the premises.
Common induction indicator words include words or phrases like probably, likely, it is plausible to suppose that, it is reasonable to think that, and it's a good bet that.
In the example above, the word probably shows that the argument is inductive.
We could interpret Zaid's argument as deductive. But this would be uncharitable, since the conclusion clearly doesn't follow from the premises with strict logical necessity. (It is logically possible--although highly unlikely--that a 90-year-old woman who walks with a cane could climb Gunung Kinabalu.) Thus, the principle of charity test tells us to treat the argument as deductive.
3.5 Exercise 1
Tony: Are there any good Italian restaurants in town?
Nasir: Yeah, Luigi's is pretty good. I've had their Neapolitan rigatoni,
their lasagne col pesto, and their mushroom ravioli. I don't think you can go wrong with any of their pasta dishes.
3.5 Exercise 2
I wonder if I have enough cash to buy my psychology textbook as well as my biology and history textbooks. Let's see, I have $200. My biology textbook costs $65 and my history textbook costs $52. My psychology textbook costs $60. With taxes, that should come to about $190. Yep, I have enough.
3.5 Exercise 3
Mother: Don't give Shahariza that brownie. It contains walnuts, and I
think She is allergic to walnuts. Last week she ate some oatmeal cookies with walnuts, and she broke out in a severe rash. some walnut fudge ice cream at Fuadah's birthday party last spring? She didn't have any allergic reaction then.
Father: Shahariza isn't allergic to walnuts. Don't you remember she ate
Deductive Reasoning
Formal education will make you a living; self-education will make you a fortune. - Jim Rohn
Identifying Premises & Conclusions (Refer to 3.3) Diagramming Short Arguments Summarizing Longer Arguments
*Real Estate Broker - A person, corporation, or partnership licensed by a state to represent a buyer or seller in a real estate transaction in exchange for a commission.
Since (1) Suzie visited a real estate broker and (2) her banks mortgage department, (3) she must be planning on buying a home.
*Real Estate Broker - A person, corporation, or partnership licensed by a state to represent a buyer or seller in a real estate transaction in exchange for a commission.
Since (1) Suzie visited a real estate broker and (2) her banks mortgage department, (3) she must be planning on buying a home.
Step 3. Use arrows to represent the intended relationship between the claims.
(1) (2)
(3)
In this case the premises are independent. Even though the combined force of both premises makes the argument stronger, either premise could stand alone in supporting the conclusion.
*Real Estate Broker - A person, corporation, or partnership licensed by a state to represent a buyer or seller in a real estate transaction in exchange for a commission.
Argument Diagramming Sample #2 Sophia cant register for her classes on Wednesday. After all, Sophia is a sophomore and sophomore registration begins on Thursday. Step #1. Identify each claim and note any indicator words that might help identify premise(s) and conclusion(s). (1) Sophia cant register for her classes on Wednesday. After all, (2) Sophia is a sophomore and (3) sophomore registration begins on Thursday.
Step #2. Use arrows to show the relationships between the claims in the argument. Decide whether the premises are independent,
(2) (3) (1) (1)
or linked.
(2) (+) (3)
These are linked premises since both (in conjunction) are necessary to prove the conclusion.
Argument Diagramming Sample #3 Pool maintenance can cost hundreds of dollars a year and we really dont have that kind of money. So, I dont think we should put a pool in this summer. Besides, pools pose a real drowning danger to small children. Step #1. The first task is to analyze the argument. Decide what the various claims are and begin to decide which are premises and which are conclusions. Number the claims and note any indicator words.
(1) Pool maintenance can cost hundreds of dollars a year and (2) we really dont have that kind of money. So, (3) I dont think we should put a pool in this summer. Besides, (4) pools pose a real drowning danger to small children.
So is a conclusion indicator. A premise indicator.
3.6.2 Paraphrasing
A paraphrase is a detailed restatement of a passage using different words and phrases. A good paraphrase is:
Accurate
It reproduces the authors meaning fairly and without bias and distortion.
Clear
Concise Charitable
Clarifies what an argument is saying. It often translates complex and confusing language into language thats easier to understand.
It captures the essence of an argument, and strips away all the irrelevant or unimportant details and puts the key points of the argument in a nutshell. It is often possible to interpret a passage in more than one way. In such cases, the principle of charity requires that we interpret the passage as charitable as the evidence reasonably permits (e.g. clarifying the arguers intent in ways that make the arguments stronger and less easy to attack).
3.6.3 Standardizing
To analyze longer arguments, we can use a method called Standardizing. Standardizing consists of restating an argument in standard logical form when each step in the argument is numbered consecutively, premises are stated above the conclusions they are claimed to support, and justifications are provided for each conclusion in the argument.
3.6.3 Standardizing
Standardizing involves five (5) basic steps: 1. Read through the argument carefully. Identify the main conclusion (it may be only implied) and any major premises and sub-conclusions. Paraphrase as needed to clarify meaning 2. Omit any unnecessary or irrelevant material. 3. Number the steps in the argument and list them in correct logical order (i.e., with the premises placed above the conclusions they are intended to support). 4. Fill in any key missing premises and conclusions (if any). 5. Add justifications for each conclusion in the argument. In other words, for each conclusion or sub-conclusion, indicate in parentheses from which previous lines in the argument the conclusion or sub-conclusion is claimed to directly follow.
Standardizing:
1. We can see something only after it has happened. 2. Future events have not yet happened. 3. So, seeing a future event seems to imply both that it has and has not happened (from 1-2) 4. It is logically impossible for an event both to have happened and not to have happened. 5. [Therefore, it is logically impossible to see a future event.] (From 3-4)
Refer to Chapter 7: Analyzing Arguments. p. 188-189. (Critical Thinking: A Student's Introduction book, 2nd Edition)
3.6.2 Standardizing: Common Mistakes to Avoid Common Mistakes to watch out for (or avoid): 1. Dont write in incomplete sentences. 2. Dont include more than one statement per line. 3. Dont include anything that is not a statement. 4. Dont include anything that is not a premise or a conclusion.
Refer to Chapter 7: Analyzing Arguments. p. 192-193. (Critical Thinking: A Student's Introduction book, 2nd Edition)
Group Activity
Global Warming: Most scientists now argue that atmospheric pollution is making the worlds climate warmer.
Break into groups of 4 - 6, read the articles on Global Warming provided by the lecturer, and then reflect, discuss and answer the following questions:
Standardize (summarize the arguments) the Global warming article (150 words or less). Is Global Warming relevant to us? Why? What strategies can Malaysia use to reduce pollution? What can You do to reduce pollution?
The Group leader must submit their findings in hard-copy or soft-copy format to the lecturer before or during the next class.
Summary
5. Deduction and Induction
Deductive arguments are arguments in which the conclusion is claimed or intended to follow necessarily from the premises. Inductive arguments are arguments in which the conclusion is claimed or intended to follow probably from the premises. To analyze an argument means to break it up into various parts to see clearly what conclusion is being defended and on what grounds. Diagramming is a quick and easy way to analyze relatively short arguments (roughly a paragraph in length or shorter). Standardizing is a method used to analyze longer arguments, which involves paraphrasing and finding missing premises and conclusions.
2. Analyzing Arguments
Any Questions?
The End
Contact Details
References
Books Chapter 3 (Deduction & Induction) & 7 (Analyzing Arguments): G Bassham, W Irwin, H Nardone, J M Wallace, Critical Thinking: A Student's Introduction, McGraw-Hill International Edition, 2007 Online Resources Climate Crisis: http://www.climatecrisis.net/ Global Warming: http://www.globalwarmingart.com/
Graphics George Bush (under water): http://sergeicartoons.blogs.sapo.pt/arquivo/Globalwarming.jpg Global Warming (sun and earth): http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/globalwarming-2.jpg Global Warming (factories): http://www.climatecrisis.net/downloads/images/Desktop-6.jpg The Earths Greenhouse Effect: http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/globalwarming-4.gif P. Ramlee: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6c/Ramlee.jpg Big burger: http://grecfrites.typepad.com/stock/images/booker_eating_big_burger.jpg