Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
presentation by Saish Tedia 08ME3117 Under the Guidance of Prof. A. Roy Chowdhury
Introduction
A laser is a device that emits light (electromagnetic radiation) through a process of optical amplification based on the stimulated emission of photons. Emergence of Laser as an effective and important tool finding wide applications in numerous manufacturing and machining processes. Increasing demands of 5-axis CNC machining to process freeform surfaces to cater to industrial requirements. Use of coating technologies for enhancement in surface properties like hardness, surface finish, porosity etc.
Laser coating
Laser beams can be focused to very tiny spots through optical lens, achieving a very high irradiance. The coating material, a powder or wire, is applied on the surface of the base material The powder absorbs energy from the laser beam melts, and deposits on the surface of the base material. Also Controlled melting of a thin layer of the base material. This leads to formation of a real metallurgical bonding between the coating and the base material.
Coating of Surfaces
Achieve many improvements in the surface properties like:
High hardness for cutting tools
Corrosion resistance
Freeform surfaces
Also called sculptured surfaces Widely used in aerospace, automobile, consumer products and the die/mold industry. Defined as surfaces containing one or more non-planar non-
bevel holes
2 additional rotational degrees of freedom. Better machining efficiency and precision. High speed machining of free-form surfaces with continuously changing curvatures and deep cavities can be performed.
Problem Definition
Lot of research has been carried out on 5-axis CNC machining of freeform surfaces about generation of accurate tool paths and minimizing contour errors.
Laser-assisted coatings have also been thoroughly studied. But, this research has mostly been restricted to flat surfaces or simple geometries.
Problem Definition
Combination of the two technologies i.e. laser-assisted
To utilize the complete potential of laser-assisted coating processes and make them industrially applicable, coating of
Objectives
Free form surface modelling of art to be laser processed, by Bezier Surface. Laser path generation (position, axis orientation) for proper laser processing of the part surface. Forward and Inverse kinematic analysis of the 5-axis CNC machine. G and M codes generation for the laser path. Carrying out experiments with the path so generated over the Bezier surface and comparison of path contour for different combinations of input parameters such as laser power, feed velocity and number of data points representing the path.
Bezier surface made using a software called Design Mentor. And cordinates of control point were obtained.
Steps Required
Defining the designed Surface in the (u,v) Direction. Calculating the radius of curvature. Calculating The Optimum Line Segment in (u,v) Converting the Length Line Segment in (u,v) Direction into Parametric Domain Obtaining the Normal at all points to calculate cutter location points.
Algorithm: The following steps are constructed for building interpolator surface: 1- Input control points of the surface as matrix (m*n). 2- Input increment value in (u and w). 3- Input u=0. 4- Input w=0. 5- Calculate the X, Y and Z coordinate of each point on the surface. 6- Plot each X, Y and Z point for surface. 7- Check the magnitude of (w 1). 8- No: Goto step (4). 9- Yes: Goto step (13). 10- Check the magnitude of ( u 1). 11- No: Goto step (3).
12- Yes: Goto step (13). 13- Calculate the radius of curvature of each point (X,Y,Z) on the surface as matrix (n*n). 14- Select the minimum radius of curvature. 15- Input tolerance between the segments line and the curve. 16- Input the height scallop. 17-Calculate the best line direction (u) or forward direction with tolerance given. 18- Calculate the best line indirection (w) or side step direction with height scallop given. 19- Input control point of surface as matrix (n,n). 20- Input increment value (line segment) in (u and w) direction.
21- Input (X=Xmin). 22- Input (Y=Ymin). 23- Calculate the X, Y and Z coordinate of each point on the surface. 24- Plot each X, Y, and Z for surface. 25- Check the magnitude of (Y=Ymax). 26- No: Goto step (22). 27- Yes: Goto step (31). 28- Check the magnitude of (X=Xmax). 29- No: Goto step (21). 30- Yes: Goto step (31).
Front view
Side view
Tilted view
LASER PROGRAMMING
Things have to be kept in mind particularly: The stand-off distance i.e. distance of the nozzle from the substrate surface should remain fixed at all times. The nozzle should traverse with a uniform feed velocity from one point to another. The cutter nozzle should be aligned in the direction of the normal to the surface. The standoff distance depends upon the specifications of the laser and that of the lens used. Optimum stand-off distance according to required spot size should be chosen so that the focussed intensity is enough to create a melting pool and bind the powder with the base material.
Joint 1 is a prismatic pair along Z axis. Joint 2 is also a prismatic pair with the axis along X axis. Joint 3 is also a prismatic pair with the axis along Y axis. Joints 4 and 5 are rotary joints. Joint 4, being a twisting pair, has its axis along Y axis whereas joint 5 is a revolute joint with its axis along X axis.
TRANSFORMATION MATRICES
nx = -sin(theta5) ny = cos(theta 4)*cos(theta5) nz = -sin(theta 4)*cos(theta5) Sx = -cos(theta5) Sy = -cos(theta4)*sin(theta5) Sz = sin(theta4)*sin(theta5) ax = 0 ay = sin(theta4) az = cos(theta4) px = -a5*sin(theta5)-d3+a1 py = a5*cos(theta4)*cos(theta5)+a3+d2 pz = -a5*sin(theta4)*cos(theta5)+d1
Equating the matrix term by term.: From comparing the results of inverse and forward kinematic analysis,
Theta 4= -1 * ( )
Theta 5= - 90 degree d1= qz + 215*sin (theta4)*cos (theta5) d2= qy - 215*cos (theta4)*cos (theta5) -585 d3 = -215*sin (theta5)-qx+675
Where: Di =(x,y,z) are the points on the curve, Bi is the control points matrix on the curve that have to be solved, k1, k2 etc. are the coefficients of the Bi terms that contain the Bernstein polynomials
The figure matches with the existing Bezier surface part and all the co-ordinates measured with CMM lie on the surface at correct locations.The difference is very small and cannot be shown distinctly in the figure.
Side View
Tilted View
X=72.4382 Y=140.5891 Z=-201.1157 a=-86.8334 c=1.5861 d1=137.6069 d2=-784.7130 d3=387.5870 u=0.0000 v=0.0000 X=-0.1249 Y=2.9978 Z=-0.1422 a=-1.3016 c=-84.6460 d1=207.0164 d2=-528.8534 d3=712.9797 u=0.1000 v=0.0000 X=-0.0656 Y=3.0895 Z=-0.0837 a=-1.0096 c=-86.7794 d1=-65.3758 d2=-628.1256 d3=475.8549 u=0.2000 v=0.0000 X=-0.0045 Y=3.0850 Z=-0.0242 a=-0.8535 c=-88.6289 d1=-124.4846 d2=-696.2966 d3=807.5543 u=0.3000 v=0.0000 X=0.0468 Y=3.0262 Z=0.0304 a=-0.7861 c=-90.1270 d1=87.8728 d2=-500.2358 d3=853.4084 u=0.4000 v=0.0000 X=0.0812 Y=2.9448 Z=0.0755 a=-0.7304 c=-91.2948 d1=143.8459 d2=-427.6113 d3=634.6145 u=0.5000 v=0.0000 X=0.0940 Y=2.8624 Z=0.1077 a=-0.6048 c=-92.1300 d1=66.4506 d2=-492.8997 d3=491.2790 u=0.6000 v=0.0000
X=0.0823 Y=2.7896 Z=0.1241 a=-0.3465 c=-92.6015 d1=8.2918 d2=-569.6348 d3=460.5292 u=0.7000 v=0.0000
X=0.0458 Y=2.7259 Z=0.1225 a=0.0671 c=-92.6616 d1=2.5041 d2=-581.5747 d3=459.9797 u=0.8000 v=0.0000 X=-0.0130 Y=2.6594 Z=0.1005 a=0.6198 c=-92.2611 d1=-47.7912 d2=-514.2022 d3=478.3366 u=0.9000 v=0.0000 X=-0.0884 Y=2.5677 Z=0.0551 a=1.2966 c=-91.3605 d1=-197.7407 d2=-528.5979 d3=620.9908 u=1.0000 v=0.0000 X=2.8984 Y=-28.8481 Z=-0.2962 a=-2.0471 c=-87.8880 d1=-219.3544 d2=-487.0018 d3=655.6528 u=0.0000 v=0.1000 X=-0.1309 Y=3.0384 Z=0.0994 a=0.9773 c=-86.1009 d1=-48.4179 d2=-550.1890 d3=469.2854 u=0.1000 v=0.1000 X=-0.0675 Y=3.1190 Z=0.0573 a=0.6943 c=-87.8034 d1=138.8947 d2=-748.0350 d3=640.5584 u=0.2000 v=0.1000
X=-0.0029 Y=3.1076 Z=0.0321 a=0.4897 c=-89.2409 d1=32.4626 d2=-640.0373 d3=880.7471 u=0.3000 v=0.1000 X=0.0512 Y=3.0441 Z=0.0180 a=0.2981 c=-90.3680 d1=-43.6666 d2=-432.9667 d3=819.6362 u=0.4000 v=0.1000 X=0.0875 Y=2.9588 Z=0.0108 a=0.1190 c=-91.1965 d1=-22.4662 d2=-372.3809 d3=655.5149 u=0.5000 v=0.1000 X=0.1014 Y=2.8723 Z=0.0076 a=-0.0167 c=-91.7274 d1=5.7973 d2=-410.1906 d3=549.7556 u=0.6000 v=0.1000 X=0.0910 Y=2.7944 Z=0.0064 a=-0.0789 c=-91.9492 d1=14.0721 d2=-442.4097 d3=514.3859 u=0.7000 v=0.1000 X=0.0576 Y=2.7242 Z=0.0059 a=-0.0622 c=-91.8427 d1=12.6319 d2=-426.0292 d3=530.5229 u=0.8000 v=0.1000 X=0.0053 Y=2.6495 Z=0.0054 a=0.0050 c=-91.3869 d1=1.6116 d2=-378.4109 d3=615.4372 u=0.9000 v=0.1000
Future Scope
Analyzing the surface properties like hardness, surface roughness, coating thickness etc. after laser coating on a metallic free form surface. Comparison of 5-axis path contour for different combinations of input parameters such as laser power, feed velocity and number of data points representing the path. Comparisons of cut width for different combinations of the above said parameters and study the corresponding variations.
References
1. Trajectory Analyses for Five-Axis Machine Tools by Rong-Shine Lin, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University and Tsong-Han Lin, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University Hope, P.A. Jacobs, R.N. Roth, (1997) "Rapid prototyping with sloping surfaces", Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 3 Issue: 1, pp.12 19 K. Chui, W. Chiu, K. Yu, Direct 5-axis tool-path generation from point cloud input using 3D biarc fitting. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 24 (2008) 270286. Tseng Y-J, Joshi S. Determining feasible tool-approach directions for machining Bezier curves and surfaces. Computer-Aided Design 1991; 23(5):367-79. G. Ruhi, O.P. Modi, A.S.K. Sinha, I.B. Singh, Corros. Sci. 50 (2008) 639.
2. 3.
4.
5.
References
6. Rong-Shine L, Koren Y. Efficient tool path planning for machining freeform surfaces. ASME Journal of Engineering Ind 1996; 118:20-8. 7. Radzevich SP. Conditions of proper sculptured surface machining. Computer-Aided Design 2002; 34:727-740 8. Ali Lasemi, Deyi Xue, Peihua Gu. Recent development in CNC machining of freeform surfaces: A state of the art review. Computer-Aided Design 2010; 42:641-654 9. Y. Chen, X. Ai, C. Huang, B. Wang, Materials Science & Engineering A288 (2000) 19. 10. M. Dressler, M. Nofz, I. Drfel, R. Saliwan-Neumann, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202(2008) 6095. 11. S. Wilson, H.M. Hawthorne, Q. Yang, T. Troczynski, Surf. Coat. Technol. 133 (2000) 389. 12. Y. Adraider, Y. Pang, F. Nabhani, S. Hodgson, Z. Zhang, Surface & Coatings Technology. 205 (2011) 53455349.
References
13. J. Ouyang, S. Sasaki, Microstructure and tribological characteristics of ZrO2Y2O3 ceramic coatings deposited by laser-assisted plasma hybrid spraying. Tribology International 35 (2002) 255264 14. S. Ahmaniemi, P. Vuoristo, T. Mantyla, Improved sealing treatments for thick thermal barrier coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology 151 152 (2002) 412417 15. W. Yuan, T. Shao, E. Fleury, D. Se, D. Chen, Microstructure and tribological properties of plasma sprayed AlCuFe quasicrystalline coatings after laser post-treatment processing. Surface & Coatings Technology 185 (2004) 99 105 16. Y. Choi, A. Banerjee, Jae-Woo Lee, Tool path generation for free form surfaces using Bezier curves/surfaces. Computers & Industrial Engineering 52 (2007) 486501