Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHAPTER 16
Learning Objectives
The standardized approach The internal ratings based approach Corporate, sovereign and bank exposures under IRB Retail exposures under IRB Equity exposures under IRB CRM under the standardized approach CRM under the foundation approach CRM under the advanced approach
Learning Objectives
The second pillar supervisory review The third pillar market discipline
Credit risk Standardized approach IRB foundation approach IRB Advanced Approach
Market risk
Standardized measurement method Internal models approach
Capital adequacy ratio (CAR) = Regulatory capital (Tier I + Tier II) / Total risk weighted assets
The Standardized Approach The risk weights depend on the credit assessments of an external credit assessment institution
Claims on sovereigns and their central banks Credit Assessment sovereign Risk weight Claims on corporates Credit assessment corporate Risk weight of AAA to AA20% A+ to A50% BBB+ to BB100% Below BB150% Unrated 100%
Claims included in the regulatory retail portfolios Risk weight Claims secured by residential property Risk weight Claims secured by commercial real estate Risk weight
Management of Financial Institutions by Dr. Meera Sharma
75%
35%
100%
Ratings
Based
The internal ratings based approach allows banks to use their internal estimates of probability of default, loss given default rate, exposure at default and effective maturity subject to approval by the regulator
The Internal Ratings Based Approach The IRB approach categorizes exposures in the banking book as follows:
Credit derivatives and guarantees Rating of guarantor Comprehensive substitutes rating of approach counterparty Exposure amount is adjusted through haircuts Own estimates of haircuts
On-balance sheet netting of loans and deposits Comprehensive approach for financial collateral used with adjustments
The four principles of supervisory review laid down in the second pillar to guide supervisors in their review process are laid out below:
Banks should have a process for assessing their overall capital adequacy in relation to their risk profile and a strategy for maintaining their capital levels. Supervisors should review and evaluate banks internal capital adequacy assessments and strategies, as well as their ability to monitor and ensure their compliance with regulatory capital ratios. Supervisors should take appropriate supervisory action if they are not satisfied with the result of this process.
Supervisors should expect banks to operate above the minimum regulatory capital ratios and should have the ability to require banks to hold capital in excess of the minimum. Supervisors should seek to intervene at an early stage to prevent capital from falling below the minimum levels required to support the risk characteristics of a particular bank and should require rapid remedial action if capital is not maintained or restored.
Risks not captured fully by pillar Risks not covered under pillar I Risks external to the bank not covered under pillar I Compliance by bank with minimum standards