SOC250 Everyday Interaction Amy Roberts; Ashleigh Morton; Jace Burgess

INSTITUTIONAL TALK

INSTITUTIONAL INTERACTION
Discourse vs. discourse Institutional settings Institutional talk Conversation analysis

SUMMARY OF READING 1
Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe. 2002. Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: shifting dynamics and identities. Discourse Studies vol. 4, no. 4: pp. 429-453.

TALK IN EDUCATIONAL CONTEXTS

Talking facilitates learning, promoting a theory of learning and cognition that emphasizes language as the mediator of higher mental processes (see Piaget, 1970; Vygotsky, 1978). (p. 429)
Talk is therefore treated as a medium for the conveying of information, with varying degrees of effectiveness, from a speaker to a listener (Maybin, 1994: 132), in a transmission model of learning. (p. 430)

SUMMARY OF READING 2

Mayes, Patricia. 2010. The discursive construction of identity and power in the critical classroom: Implications for applied critical theories. Discourse and Society vol. 21, no. 2: pp. 189-210.

POWER
The findings suggest that applied critical theories are often too simplistic, assuming that power can be straightforwardly transferred from the powerful to the powerless. (p. 189) Heritage (1997) suggests that power may be understood in terms of asymmetries that arise through interaction in institutional settings. (p. 194)

IDENTITY
In the past identity was seen as a fixed, stable property of the individual psyche (Bucholtz and Hall, 2005). (p. 194) Identity is dynamic, intersubjective, constructed moment by moment through social interaction, and, at the same time, subject to existing ideologies and perceived social constraints. It also suggests that identities are best investigated by examining how participants use language in context (Potter and Wetherell, 1987; Widdicombe and Wooffitt, 1995; Edley and Wetherell, 1997; Antaki and Widdicombe, 1998; Wetherell, 1998; Widdicombe, 1998; Coupland, 2001; Bucholtz and Hall, 2005). (p. 195)

RELATIONSHIP OF THEM
Recent work in conversation analysis suggests that power can be analyzed as a dynamic construct that is realized as social identities are constructed through interaction. (p. 194) The important link between power and identity in this framework is the emphasis on how both of these social constructs come into play through discursive action. (p. 194)

SOC250
Talk a catalyst? OR Learning itself? Asymmetrical vs. Symmetrical Guided vs. Controlled Discussion 3 Part formulation: Ask question Respond to question Evaluate response to question

CONNECTING THE DOTS

Dramaturgy (wk 5)
Frontstage and backstage

Rudeness (wk 10)

speech as performative Pragmatics

CONNECTING THE DOTS

Accomplishing sociocultural identity in talk (wk 8)
Discourse markers

The social and moral order in talk (wk 7)

Telling the code

Ethnomethodology (wk 6)

INSTITUTIONALIZED SETTINGS
Community service settings that facilitate its residents with access to education, legal, and health services. I want to expand this definition to include places of employment, churches and services such as Centrelink.

BOSS VS. EMPLOYEE

CRAZY GUY DANCING IN CHURCH

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EaI0U1_IW4

CENTRELINK

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVzE3nQaBqw

PLAY TIME!!!

Q&A ?