Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PROJECT PRESENTATION
Reduction in number of amendments to the contract
By
6
DEFINE
PROJECT CHARTER
PROJECT ID GB BB MBB CHAMPION START DATE PROJECT FOCUSSED PROJECT CURRENT IMPROVED SAVINGS Z Z : : Mr. Brahmadeo Roy : Mr Puvendra D : Mr. Girish SR , Sr DGM/BEQI : Mr Amol Newaskar, GM, MilCom : April 2011 : To reduce Number of amendments to the contract. : Elimination of amendments from the contracts : : : Nov 2011 : Rs7,48,800
COMPLETION DATE
6
DEFINE
PROJECT CHARTER
BUSINESS CASE
We receive enquiries for quotations from the various customers. Quotations are generated against RFQs through SAP and submitted to the customers. We receive orders from the customers. On receipt of orders , Contract review is done. Finance, Marketing, Production Control, Testing, and Quality departments take part in the Contract Review meeting. Concerned departments check the contract from their prospective and if they find any discrepancies, they give feedback to marketing department to seek amendments from the customers. The amendments may be pertaining to the various parameters like payments terms, Inspection, Part No. not correct, Description not matching as per drawing etc. These discrepancies need to be corrected before the items are offered to customer for inspection.
6
DEFINE
PROJECT CHARTER
PROJECT SCOPE: From Receipt of order to the completion of the dispatch of the material.
GOAL STATEMENT: From present status of many amendments to Zero amendments SUPPORT REQUIRED: Bharat Electronics Quality Institute, Sr.DGM, Mktg&CS /MCE . SCHEDULE: Complete within 6 months
6
DEFINE
PRESENT SYSTEM
Presently quotations are submitted to the customers by Marketing departments. Quotations are generated through SAP and also off-line. Because of discrepancy in the SAP data bases, errors are bound to creep in. Before sending the quote to the customers, Part No. and descriptions are not checked by other concerned departments. Sometimes in hurry , Description , Part No. and other commercial terms go unnoticed. Which creates problem when the final order is received. Some times , customer uses his own data base (Old data base viz Part No. and Description and generates order based on that.
On receipt of order , contract review is done with QA, PC, testing, D&E, and Finance Departments. Marketing department takes care of pricing. Other concerned departments give letter to seek amendments to rectify the errors in the contract.
6
DEFINE
SIPOC
Supplier
Customers
Input
Supply Order / Contract
Process
Output
Customer
Discrepancies
Army/Navy/Air force
Conduct Meeting
Feed Back
Receipt of Amendments
6
DEFINE
CTQ
Correct Description
Project Officers
Experienced officer
Other Departments
Elimination of errors
6
DEFINE
KANO STATUS
Correct Description
Description not matching with Drawing Wrong description Old Data base Lack of Knowledge Errors in documents
Must be
SAP Data Base Customer Data base Project Officer Other Departments
6
MEASURE
DATA COLLECETD
AMENDMENTS TO THE CONTRACT
Sl .No.
CUSTOMER PROJECT Date 10-Sep-11
ORDER
AMENDMENT FOR
Types of Amdt
1 2 3 4
GRSE GRSE
PRC6020A PRC6020A
BEL Inspection, Inclusion of Part.Nos for two items BEL Inspection, Inclusion of Part.Nos for two items
7-Sep-11 7-Sep-11
L&T
PRC6020A
Amdt. For the change in the P.No. of data transfer software[ to 458610121218 frm 991910906692]
21-Aug-11
ITBP
LHP265D
Amdt.in P.No.
31-Jul-11
ITBP
LHP265D
Descp. For Sl.No. 1,4, 14, 18, 21[ LHP-265D set, Ni-Cd Bty, Carrying box, Antenna HF-BB Dipole, Data Cable.]
31-Jul-11
Description
6 7 8 9
MO(KAR)
EK896
28-Jul-11
MO(KAR) MO(K)
EK896 PRC6020A
1) TERMS OF PRICE, 2) CHANGE IN PART No. OF X'stor as 429300200123 PO Value is not CORRECT
28-Jul-11 25-Jul-11
BSF
LHP265D
IG/Comn/BSF/3087dt 13.06.2011 and 3244 dt 16.06.2011 1) Antenna nomenclature , Ni Cd Bty & Charger Bty nomenclature
25-Jul-11
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
BSF
LHP265D
IG/Comn/BSF/3087dt 13.06.2011 and 3244 dt 16.06.2011 ED and VAT 5% 10VBLC909 DT. 10.6.2011 4700001687/N10 dt. 09.06.2011 4700001687/N10 dt. 09.06.2011 4700001687/N10 dt. 09.06.2011 4700001687/N10 dt. 09.06.2011 4700001687/N10 dt. 09.06.2011 09BBLC001 Dt. 10.5.10
CHANGE IN NOMENCLATURE FOR 04 ITEMS Part.No., Mistake
25-Jul-11
Tax Description Part No. Terms of price Payment Terms Tax Inspection Description
MO(V) GRSE
EK896 PRC6020A
16-Jul-11 5-Jul-11
GRSE
PRC6020A
TERMS OF PRICE
5-Jul-11
GRSE GRSE
PRC6020A PRC6020A
5-Jul-11 5-Jul-11
GRSE
PRC6020A
BEL Inspec,
5-Jul-11
MO(MB)
EK896
25-Jun-11
18
L&T
PRC6020A
(1)Amdt. For the inclusion of all the P.Nos. in the PO [ wittn by Mktg-Milcomm]
21-Jun-11
Part No.
19 20 21
L&T
PRC6020A
Amdt. For the change in the P.No. of the Data Transfer software ( i.e. to 458610121218)
20-Jun-11
L&T GRSE
PRC6020A PRC6020A
20-Jun-11 10-Jun-11
6
MEASURE
DATA COLLECETD
22
MoD, New Delhi EK896
8-Jun-11
DD Extn
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
MO(V)
LHP265D
07VBLC042 DT. 14.7.08 07VBLC042 DT. 14.7.08 181614 DT. 26.3.07 10KBLC009 DT. 07.04.11 10KBLC009 DT. 07.04.11 10KBLC009 DT. 07.04.2011 10KBLC009 DT. 07.04.2011 10VBLC007 DT.28.6.10 P/W-SSB-2009(17) Dt. 28.03.11 3030003509 DT. 16.4.11
8-Jun-11
Part No. Description DD Extn Part No. Description Part No. Description DD Extn Order Value Tax
MO(V) GSL, GOA MO(K) MO(K) MO(K) MO(K) MO(V) SSB NEW DELHI
Nomenclature wrong. DD Extn till 31.12.2011 BSP Ni-Cd Part No. 1800 100 12331 Nomenclacure Mistake Amdt. for Ni-Cd P.No. & Descp. Amdt. for Ni-Cd P.No. & Descp. DD Extn till 31.12.2011 PRICE Amdt. It should be Rs. 107026958/- instead of Rs 106551036/-
MDL
PRC6020A
7-May-11
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
MO(KAR)
PRC6020A
6-May-11
Payment Terms Indemnity Bond Part No. Description Payment Terms Indemnity Bond DD Extn Terms of price
MO(KAR) BSF
PRC6020A LHP265D
6-May-11 6-May-11
CGHQ
PRC6020A
LC/438/CGS(MP)/75/SO-07/11-12 DT. 18.4.11 1) P.No NOT MATCHING WITH RESPECTIVE DESCRIPTION 3030003509 DT. 16.04.2011 3030003509 DT. 16.04.2011 3030003509 DT. 16.04.2011 3030003509 DT. 16.04.2011
100% Payment on proof of despatch
5-May-11
MDL
PRC6020A
7-Apr-11
MDL
PRC6020A
I-Bond
7-Apr-11
MDL
PRC6020A
7-Apr-11
MDL
PRC6020A
7-Apr-11
41
MO(V)
EK896
15-Mar-11
DD Extn
42
MO(MB)
EK896
SHORT CLOSURE : XF MRC coil .098 mic Henry VAR 496016252558 obsolescence
15-Mar-11
Part No.
43
COD-AGRA
RRF
15-Mar-11
Part No.
44
COD-AGRA
RRF
15-Mar-11
Part No.
6
ANALYSE
Terms of price
Payment Terms Tax
Order Value
6
ANALYSE
Projects
EK896 PRC6020 LHP265D RRF Stars V
Nos. of Errors
44 83 23 2 5
6
7
VRC6100M
1KW
7
3
6
ANALYSE
44
Nos. of Amdt.
EK896 44
PRC6020 83
LHP265D 23
RRF 2
Stars V 5
VRC6100M 7
1KW 3
Nos. of Amdt.
10
20
40
50
60
30
DD Extn
Description
Indemnity Bond
Inspection
Nos.
Nos.
Order Value
Part No.
Payment Terms
Tax
Terms of Price
ANALYSE
6
ANALYSE Sl.No. Types of Amendements 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DD Extn Description Indemnity Bond Inspection Order Value Part No. Payment Terms Tax Terms of Price Nos. 30 45 11 5 4 42 4 17 8
6
ANALYSE
Vital few: 80% of the Amendments are due to the following steps 1 2 3 4 : Description of the items : Part No. of the items : DD Extension : Tax
6
ANALYSE
Receipt from PC
Pricing Decision
Valuation Type by PC
Receipt of Order
Preparation
of Quote
Management Approval
Contract Review
Yes
Creation of
Sale Order
Offering to
the customer
No Intimate to customer
Dispatch of Items
Generation of OBD
Inspect ion
6
ANALYSE
C1
Drawing Title
Wrong Part No.
SAP description
C6
C2
C4
C5
C3
C8
Entry Permit
C10
C11
C7
Terms of price
Customer Process
C12
Commercial terms
Method
C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8
CONSTANTS
Order processing
C9 C10 C11 C12 More no. of Amendments
RESPONSE
ANALYSE
6
IMPROVE
C- FACTORS
C1:Drawing Title
EARLIER PROCESS Drawing Title and Method of designation do not match with SAP description While Generating Quotations , Description comes from SAP Master data Customer uses his own data Base for Part No. and description Due to wrong part no. available with customer or Typographical error, customer gives wrong part no. in the order
IMPROVED PROCESS SAP description has been corrected/Updated for PP/MP of deliverable items SAP description and Drawing Description match
6
IMPROVE
EARLIER PROCESS CQAL/SQAL Inspector inspects the items as per Drawing / Contract / Offering Letter Skill and Experience of Purchase offices and sales officers play vital role in determining correctness of Contract/ Supply Order Many Customers place the order without negotiating the Terms of price. Many Customers place the order without indicating correct Duties and Taxes. Excise , CST & VAT
No changes
6
IMPROVE
EARLIER PROCESS Delivery Date is indicated as per the quotation. Due to some unavoidable reasons DD slip. Sometimes customer does not indicate End use and does not provide us Entry Permit. Octroi and Road Permit etc. Partially done in SAP because of many other reasons.
Customer is requested to provide End Use and Entry Permit along with the order.
Enquiry and Quote are generated through SAP. This makes sure correctness of part No. and description No control over customer process.
C12:Customer Process
IMPROVE
Done manually with little help from SAP Mis-match of SAP description and Drawing Description Mistakes are cropping due to manual typing
6
IMPROVE
DD Extension
Realistic Delivery time is indicated in the quote . At the same time we also monitor strictly
Order type is finalized in the beginning to avoid any avoid any custom, Excise, CST and VAT This confusion is removed by bearing Freight and insurance by BEL.
Terms of price
Entry Permit
Depending on consignee, Customer are requested to provide Entry permit along with the order.
6
IMPROVE
6
IMPROVE
Customer Communication
6
IMPROVE
Customer Communication
6
IMPROVE
6
SAP MASTER DATA BASE CORRECTED
IMPROVE
6
CONTROL
Changes are
updated as and when communication is received from D&E Quotations are generated by the well trained professional Customer communications to generate the order exactly as
6
CONTROL
BENEFITS OF THE IMPROVED SYSTEM On an average 26 hours per operator per month saved
6
CONTROL
Saving
26 hours per operator per months Rs.800 per hour For 3 projects (at least) For 2 operators (at least) Total saving = 26x12x800x3= Rs.7,48,800