A Research Analysis between walls and Omore

PRESENTED BY:

Questionnaire

Research Analysis between walls and Omore

Descriptive statistics Distributions of High and Low user Current position of different companies Analysis of Quality, Taste and Price How Monthly Ice-cream Expense Depends on Age? Test ,whether the proportion of market share is same as the different companies clamed? Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test Test , whether male selection preferences differed significantly from female selection preference. Chi-Square Test for Homogeneity

This Data is Belongs to Students, Businessmen, and Job Holder

PROFESSION Cumulative Frequency Valid STUDENT BUSINESS MAN JOB HOLDER OTHER Total 40 27 31 2 100 Percent 40.0 27.0 31.0 2.0 100.0 Valid Percent 40.0 27.0 31.0 2.0 100.0 Percent 40.0 67.0 98.0 100.0

Frequency Male/Female
SEX Cumulative Frequency Valid MALE FEMALE Total 61 39 100 Percent 61.0 39.0 100.0 Valid Percent 61.0 39.0 100.0 Percent 61.0 100.0

SEX Cumulative Frequency Valid MALE FEMALE Total 61 39 100 Percent 61.0 39.0 100.0 Valid Percent 61.0 39.0 100.0 Percent 61.0 100.0

SEX * FAV_ICE_CREEM Crosstabulation FAV_ICE_CREEM WALLS SEX MALE Count Expected Count % within SEX FEMALE Count Expected Count % within SEX Total Count Expected Count % within SEX 33 36.0 54.1% 26 23.0 66.7% 59 59.0 59.0% OMORE 28 25.0 45.9% 13 16.0 33.3% 41 41.0 41.0% Total 61 61.0 100.0% 39 39.0 100.0% 100 100.0 100.0%

High and Low user

Distributions of High and Low user

MONTHLY_ EXPENCE_ICECREEM * FAV_ICE_ CREEM Crosstabulation Count FAV_ICE_CREEM WALLS MONTHL Y_EXPENCE_ICEC 100.00 REEM 200.00 500.00 1000.00 1500.00 2000.00 2500.00 Total 8 6 10 12 8 10 5 59 OMORE 2 4 11 6 8 8 2 41 Total 10 10 21 18 16 18 7 100

Distributions of High and Low user

Current position of different companies ?

FAV_ICE_CREEM * MY_FAVOURATE_BCOZ Crosstabulation Count MY_FAVOURATE_BCOZ QUALITY FAV_ICE_CREEM WALLS OMORE Total 29 7 36 TASTE 15 24 39 PRICE 15 10 25 Total 59 41 100

Current position of different companies ?

How Monthly Walls Ice-cream Expense Depends on Age?

Model Summary Adjusted R Model 1 R .529

a

Std. Error of the Estimate

R Square .280

Square .272

8.657

a. Predictors: (Constant), MONTHLY_EXPENCE_ICECREEM

ANOVA Model 1 Regression Residual Total Sum of Squares 2849.891 7344.219 10194.110 df

Mean Square 1 98 99 2849.891 74.941

F 38.028

Sig. .000a

a. Predictors: (Constant), MONTHLY_EXPENCE_ICECREEM b. Dependent Variable: AGE

Coefficients a Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1 (Constant) MONTHL Y_EXPENCE_ICEC REEM a. Dependent Variable: AGE B 14.320 3.072 Std. Error 2.182 .498 .529 Coefficients Beta t 6.563 6.167 Sig. .000 .000

Y= a+ bX Y = 14.320 +3.072(X)
Monthly expence of wall ice cream =14.320+ 3.072(Age)

Rs.107 = 14.320+ 3.072(30 years)

NOTE : Age zero , Makes no sense

Chi-Square Goodness-ofFit Test

The test procedure described in this lesson is appropriate when the following conditions are met: The sampling method is simple random sampling. The population is at least 10 times as large as the sample. The variable under study is categorical. The expected value for each level of the variable is at least 5.

Problem#1
Different Ice Cream companies claim that 65% of the market share is covered by Walls, and 35% is cover by Omore. Total 100%

Suppose a randomly-selected 100 customers of different companies shows that Walls 59% , and Omore got 41%
Tell us Is this consistent with Telecom companies 's claim? Use a 0.05 level of significance.

 State the hypotheses.

The first step is to state the null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis. Null hypothesis: The proportion of customers are as fellow, 65% of the customers are of walls, and 35% Omore respectively.

Alternative hypothesis: At least one of the proportions in the null hypothesis is false.

`
Analyze Sample Data. Applying the chi-square goodness of fit test to sample data, we compute the degrees of freedom, the expected frequency counts, and the chi-square test statistic. Based on the chi-square statistic and the degrees of freedom, we determine the P-value.

where DF is the degrees of freedom, k is the number of levels of the categorical variable, n is the number of observations in the sample, Ei is the expected frequency count for level i, Oi is the observed frequency count for level i, and 2 is the chi-square test statistic.

DF= K= 2-1=1 (Ei) = n * pi (E1) = 100 * 0.41 = 41 (E2) = 100 * 0.59 = 59

 2 = [ (Oi - Ei)2 / Ei ] 2 = [ (59 - 65)2 /65 ] + [ (41 - 35)2 / 35 ]

2 = [ 0.554 ] + [ 1.029]
2 = 1.58

We use the Chi-Square Distribution Calculator to find P(2 > 1.58) = 0.2088

 Interpret results.

Since the P-value (0.2088) is more than the significance level (0.05), we can accept the null hypothesis. Means Accept: Null hypothesis: The proportions in the null hypothesis is true.

Chi-Square Test for Homogeneity

This lesson explains how to conduct a chi-square test of homogeneity. The test is applied to a single categorical variable from two different populations. It is used to determine whether frequency counts are distributed identically across different populations.

 In a survey of Ice Cream companies, How people chose preferences? we might ask respondents to identify their favorite company . We might ask the same question of two different populations, such as males and females. We could use a chi-square test for homogeneity to determine whether male selection preferences differed significantly from female selection preference.

 State the hypotheses. The first step is to state the null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis. Null hypothesis: The null hypothesis states that the proportion of boys who prefer the Walls is identical to the proportion of girls. Similarly, for the Omore. Thus
H0: Pboys who prefer Walls H0: Pboys who prefer Omore = Pgirls who prefer Walls = Pgirls who prefer Omore

Alternative hypothesis: At least one of the null hypothesis statements is false.

Formulate an analysis plan. For this

analysis, the significance level is 0.05. Using sample data, we will conduct a chisquare test for homogeneity.

Analyze sample data. Applying the

chi-square test for homogeneity to sample data, we compute the degrees of freedom, the expected frequency counts, and the chi-square test statistic. Based on the chi-square statistic and the degrees of freedom, we determine the P-value.

FAV_ICE_CREEM * SEX Crosstabulation Count SEX MALE FAV_ICE_CREEM WALLS OMORE Total 33 28 61 FEMALE 26 13 39 Total 59 41 100

FAV_ICE_CREEM * SEX Crosstabulation SEX MALE FAV_ICE_CREEM WALLS Count Expected Count OMORE Count Expected Count Total Count Expected Count 33 36.0 28 25.0 61 61.0 FEMALE 26 23.0 13 16.0 39 39.0 Total 59 59.0 41 41.0 100 100.0

Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test N of Valid Cases 100
b

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

df
a

sided) 1 1 1 .213 .299 .210

1.554

1.077 1.570

.297

.150

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.99. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Interpret results. Since the P-value (0.213) is more than the significance level (0.05), we can accept the null hypothesis.

Alternative hypothesis: The null hypothesis statements is true