The Imperative of Agricultural Progress and Rural Development

It

is in the agriculture sector that the battle for long-term economic development will be won or lost. -Gunmar Myrdal, Nobel Laureate in Economics main burden of development and employment creation will have to be borne by the part of the economy in which agriculture is the predominant activity, that is the rural sector.

The

-Francis

Blanchard, Director General, ILO

 Agricultural

sector and rural economy must be the dynamic and leading elements in overall strategy of development in developing countries. An agriculture and employment-based strategy of economic development requires at a minimum three basic complementary elements:

(a)

(b)

(c)

Accelerated output growth through technological, institutional and price incentive changes designed to raise the productivity of small farmers; Rising domestic demand for agricultural output derived from an employment oriented urban development strategy; and Diversified, nonagricultural, labor intensive rural development activities that directly and indirectly support and are supported by the farming community

 It

has been observed that agricultural and rural development can be seen as a sine qua non of national development. Without such integrated rural development, industrial growth either would be stultified or, if it succeeded, would create such severe internal imbalances in the economy that the problems of widespread poverty, inequality and unemployment would become even more pronounced. In pursuing development strategies, the following questions must be addressed by development planners and technocrats as it relates to overall

National development:
(1)

(2)

How can total agricultural output and productivity per capita be substantially increased in a manner that will directly benefit the average small farmer and the landless rural dweller while providing a sufficient food surplus to support a growing urban, industrial sector? What is the process by which traditional low-productivity peasant farms are transformed into high-productivity commercial enterprises?

(3) When traditional family farmers and peasant cultivators resist change, is their behavior stubborn and irrational, or are they acting rationally within the context of their particular economic environment?; (4) Are economic and price incentives sufficient to elicit output increases among peasant agriculturists, or are institutional and structural changes in rural farming systems also required? (5) Is raising agricultural productivity sufficient to improve rural life, or must there be concomitant offfarm employment creation along with improvements in educational, medical, and other social services? In other words, what do we mean by rural development, and how it can be achieved?

TWO KINDS OF WORLD AGRICULTURE (1) Highly efficient agriculture of the developed countries, where substantial productive capacity and high output per worker permit a very small member of farmers to feed entire nations; and (2) Inefficient and low-productivity agriculture of developing countries, where in many instances the agricultural sectoral can barely sustain the farm population, let alone the burgeoning urban population, even at a minimum level of subsistence.

 The

gap between the two kinds of agriculture is immense. This is more illustrated in table below. The projection for the end of the century show the productivity gap widening to 40 to 1.Another manifestation of the productivity gap relates to land productivity. Table 2 shows the variation. In developed countries there has been a steady growth of agricultural output since the mid 18th century. This growth has been spurred by technological and biological improvements, which have resulted to even higher levels of labor and land productivity.

The picture is entirely different when we turn to the agricultural production experience of the of the 3rd world nations. In many poor countries, agricultural production methods have changed relatively slowly over time. Rapid rural population growth has compounded the problem by causing great pressure to be exerted on existing resources. Where fertile land is scarce, especially throughout south and Southeast Asia and Africa, rapid population growth has led to an increase in the number of people living in each unit of land. Given the same farming technology and the use of traditional labor non-labor inputs (simple tools, animal power, traditional seeds), we know from the principle of diminishing returns that as more and more people are forced to work on a given piece of land, their marginal (and average) productivity will decline. The net result is a continuous deterioration in real living standards for rural peasants.

 To

avert massive starvation and raise levels of living for average rural dweller, agricultural production and productivity of both labor and land must be rapidly increased. Most 3rd world nations like the Philippines must be more selfsufficient in their food production; others can rely on their non agricultural exports to secure the necessary foreign exchange to import food requirement. But for the majority of debt-ridden, inefficient, and unsuccessful exporters, unless major economic, institutional and structural changes are made in their farming systems, their food dependence, will increase in the coming years.

1960 MDCs LDCs

Agricultural population

1980 MDCs LDCs 75 1,230 125 77

2000 MDCs LDCs 50 1,480 186 135

(millions) Total agri productn (billions of dollars) Per capita agri production (dollars)

115 850 78 43

680 52

1660 63

3,720 91

Country Japan United States Bangladesh Mexico Brazil India Pakistan Nigeria

Average Grain Yield (tons per hectare) 5.8 4.8 2. 2 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.6 0.8

Population (million) 122 241 104 82 143 785 102 105

Sources of Small-Scale Agricultural Progress 1. Technological change and innovation 2. Appropriate government economic policies 3. Supportive social institutions
Improving small scale agriculture

Technology and innovation New agricultural technologies and innovations in farm practices are preconditions for sustained improvements in levels of output and productivity. Two major sources of technological innovation can increase farm yields but have problematic implications for third world agricultural development. (1) Introduction of mechanized agriculture to replace human labor. The introduction of labor saving machinery can have a dramatic effect on the volume of output per worker , especially where land is extensively cultivated and labor

is scarce. For example one man is operating a huge combine harvester can accomplish in a single hour what would require hundreds of workers using traditional methods. In rural areas of most developing nations where land parcels are small, capital is scarce, and labor is abundant, the introduction of heavily mechanized techniques is not only ill suited to the physical environment , more importantly has the effect of creating more rural unemployment without necessarily lowering per unit cost of food production. Importation therefore of such machinery can therefore be anti-developmental in that its efficient deployment requires large tracts of land and tends to exacerbate the already serious problems of rural poverty and unemployment. And if mechanized technique exclude women, the male-female productivity gap could widen further with serious repercussion.

(2). Biological (hybrid seeds), water control (irrigation) and chemical (fertilizer, pesticides, insecticides, etc) innovations- are not without their own problems. They are land augmenting, that is they improve the quality of existing land by raising yields per hectare. Only indirectly do they increase output per worker. Improved seeds; advanced techniques of irrigation and crop rotation; the increasing use of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides; and new developments in veterinary medicines and animal nutrition represent major scientific advances in modern agriculture. These measures are technologically scale-neutral; theoretically they can be applied equally effectively on large and small farms. They do not necessarily require large capital inputs or mechanized equipment.

Land Reform.

Farm structures and land tenure patterns must be adapted to the dual objectives of increasing food production and promoting a wider distribution of the benefits of agrarian progress. Agricultural and rural development that benefits the masses of people can succeed only through a joint effort by the government and all farmers, not just the large farmers, which means providing secured tenure rights to the individual farmer. A small farmers attachment to his land is profound. It is closely bound up with his innermost sense of self-esteem and freedom from coercion. When he is driven off his land or is gradually impoverished through accumulated debt

Not only is his material well-being damaged, but more important his sense of self worth and his desire for self-and family improvement can be permanently destroyed. When land is very unevenly distributed , rural peasants can have little hope for economic advancement, thus Land Reform remains a pre-requisite for development. If programs of land reform can be legislated and effectively implemented by the government , the basis for improved output level and higher standards of living for rural farmers will be established. Unfortunately, many land reform efforts have failed because LDC governments bowed to political pressures from powerful landowning groups and failed to intended reforms.

Supportive policies.

The full benefit of small scale agricultural development cannot be realized unless government support systems are created that provide the necessary incentives, economic opportunities, and access to needed inputs to enable small cultivators to expand their output and raise their productivity. There must be corresponding changes in rural institutions that control production (banks, money lenders, seed and fertilizer distributors) in supporting government aid services (technical and educational extension services, public credit agencies, storage and marketing facilities, rural transport and feeder roads), and in government pricing policies with regard to both inputs (removing factor-price distortion) and out put (paying market-value prices to farmers). Even where land reform is not necessary but where productivity and incomes are low, this broad network of external support services, along with appropriate governmental pricing policies related to both farm inputs and outputs, is an essential condition for sustained agricultural progress.

 Integrated

Development Objectives.

Rural development though dependent primarily on small farmer agricultural progress, implies much more. It encompasses (a) efforts to raise both farm and non farm rural real incomes through job creation, rural industrialization, and the increased provision of education, health and nutrition, housing, and a variety of related social and welfare services; (b) a decreasing inequality in the distribution of rural incomes and a lessening of urbanrural imbalances in income and economic opportunities; and the capacity of the rural sector to sustain and accelerate the pace of these improvements over time.

By restoring a proper balance between urban and rural economic opportunities and by creating the conditions for broad popular participation in national development efforts and rewards, developing nations will have taken a giant step toward the realization of the true meaning of development.

In third world agrarian systems, women plays a crucial role in agricultural production. After the initial task of cutting trees and bushes on a potentially cultivable plot of land by men, women are responsible for all subsequent operations, including removing and burning of felled trees, sowing or planting the plot, weeding, harvesting, and preparing the crop for storage or immediate consumption. In addition to their reproductive roles, they provide an important source of labor for cash crop production, cultivate food for household consumption, raise and market livestock, generate additional income through cottage

Industries, collect firewood and water, and perform household chores including the processing and cooking of foods. Due to the time consuming nature of their diverse responsibilities, women tend to work longer hours than their male counterparts. Studies concerning the allocation of womens time among different activities have greatly increased international recognition of the importance of rural womens economic contribution. It has become clear thAt since women produce a large share of agricultural output, successful agricultural reform require raising womens productivity.

The diversity of womens duties makes it difficult to determine their share of agricultural prodn, much less place an economic value on their work. Current estimates shows 60 to 80 per cent of agricultural labor in addition to household chores are provided by women in rural agricultural production. Much of their work is statistically invisible in that women often receive no payment for the work they perform. Women make an important contribution to the agricultural economy through the labor they supply in the cultivation of cash crops. Though the production and profits from commercial crops are generally controlled by men, women, are usually responsible for the strenuous jobs of weeding and transplanting. As population density increases and land becomes more fragmented, the length of time that women must spend walking to and from the fields increases, often in hot climate that make strenuous work exceedingly difficult.

 Also

women cultivate small vegetable gardens that provide food for domestic consumption. Although the cash value of the produce from the vegetable garden maybe small, it represent an important component of the total resources available to women. Food security of the family is the most important role of women. This is done through supplementation of household earnings, diversification of hh income sources, and raising of livestock to augment hh assets.The prodn of vegetable insulates the family during prices swing of food prices.

 Government

extension program that provides resources exclusively to men tend to exacerbate the existing disparities between mens and womens access to resources. Thus it is important that the design of government extension program reflect the interests of all household members.