Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Objectives
Identify common quality improvement (QI) tools used to focus on important problems List tools for identifying problem causes Recognize tools for defining solutions Review tools used to develop QI plans Plan to display QI data
Reference: Langley, G.J.; Nolan, K.M.; Nolan, T.W.; Norman, C.L.; and Provost, L.P. (1996). The Improvement Guide, San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass Publishers
P
A
Define the problem areas Compare the current state with the desired state Check alignment with organizational mission and goals
Brainstorming Idea writing Impact analysis Pareto Diagram Problem statement Selection grid
Brainstorming
A focused creativity technique designed to collect multiple ideas about an issue Benefits
Encourages creative thinking Generates a large number of ideas Gets all team members involved Eliminates fear of criticism Increases the number of options
Brainstorming Rules
No criticisms or compliments No discussion No questions Speed is important Think broadly Develop wild, outrageous ideas Build on ideas of others Listen Do not interrupt Quantity is important
Brainstorming Steps
1. Clarify the brainstorming objective 2. Write the objective at the top of the flip chart 3. Review brainstorming rules 4. Determine process: free flow or take turns 5. Record each idea on the flip chart 6. Continue until all ideas are exhausted 7. Clarify each idea after all ideas are listed 8. Group like ideas together
Idea Writing
Idea notes may be written before the team meeting Protects anonymity Idea notes shared at the meeting Includes those who cannot attend
Impact Analysis
Confirms the problem or project is worthwhile Indicates the severity of the problem Often uncovers new information Allows for sharing of thoughts, opinions, and ideas
Pareto Diagram
Bar chart that demonstrates the distribution of issues that cause most of the problems Benefits
Applies the 80/20 rule Focuses on the 20% of the work that cause 80% of the problems Gives the biggest return for your efforts Helps explain problem to others
Pareto Diagram
Reasons women do not get mammograms May, 2003
15 10 5 0
Fear No insurance Forgot Test not ordered
12 8 7 3 Total
Problem Statement
Spells out the impact of the current state Defines the opportunities of the desired state Explains the expected impact of correcting the situation Delivers a consistent message
Define Goals
Flow chart the process Fishbone or Cause and Effect Diagram Impact analysis Data Pareto Diagram
Determine cause
Clarifies current knowledge of process Demonstrates the work flow Examines parts of a process and their relationship to each other Identifies the sources of variation for each step from start to finish Points out unnecessary complexity, inefficiency, and redundancy Develops a common understanding
Flowchart Steps
Involve those most knowledgeable about the process Define the boundaries (beginning and end) List the work activities, decisions, and documents Place the activities, decisions, and documents in the order that they occur Connect the activities with arrows
NO A1C due?
YES
Nurse/MA obtains blood sample and documents results
NO
YES
Nurse/MA conducts foot exam and documents on foot exam form Physician/PA/NP enters exam room Physician/PA/NP reviews documentation
Explores and displays the identified causes and relationships leading to a specific outcome Benefits
Involves multiple team members Allows grouping of information Displays related causes Gives ideas for goals Points out data needs Provides ideas for solutions Presents big picture of the problem Easy to understand
Fishbone or Cause & Effect Steps 1. Agree on the problem statement or outcome 2. Identify major cause categories 3. Brainstorm reasons for each of the major causes 4. Clarify the diagram 5. Post for others to review
Outcome
Methods
Environment
Examine Solutions
Brainstorming Impact analysis Pareto Diagram Flowchart Fishbone Collaboration with others Literature
Decision matrix Selection grid Multi-voting Cost-benefit analysis Force Field Analysis
Decision Matrix
Easy to Do
Hard to Do
A.
B.
C.
D.
Selection Grid
Criteria
Worthwhile
Options
A 4 yes 2 no 3 yes 3 no 5 yes 1 no 2 yes 4 no
Cost
3 yes 3 no 5 yes 1 no 2 yes 4 no yes 4 no 4 yes 2 no
Admin Support
3 yes 3 no 4 yes 2 no 3 yes 3 no 3 yes 3 no
Criteria #4
Criteria #5
6 yes
Multi-voting
A group decision-making technique designed to reduce a large list of ideas to a manageable number. Benefits
Eliminates peer pressure Equal participation Allows for consensus Gains buy-in among the team
Multi-voting Steps
1. List ideas or options on flip chart or chalk board 2. Each team member votes for their top three choices 3. Clarify among the team and eliminate choices with one or zero votes 4. Each team member selects top two choices from the remaining list 5. Repeat the process until the top one or two ideas have been selected
Cost-benefit Analysis
Determine the financial impact by comparing the costs and benefits Benefits
Evaluates the cost of a change Supports decision-making Provides supporting documentation for QI teams recommendation
Identify and discuss forces that support or interfere with a change Benefits
Determine Measures
How will we know that a change is an improvement? What are the data needs? Consider:
Check List
Easy-to-use form Minimal data collector training Efficient and fast data collection Detects patterns and trends
Check List
Steps Decide on data to collect Clarify definitions Decide on time period for collection Select sample size Decide who will collect data Design and test the check list Distribute form and collect the data Tally and evaluate
Action Plan
Action Plan Project Name: _________________________________ Goal (s) What are we trying to accomplish? 1. Steps What needs to be done? Project Lead: ________________ Date: ________________ Accountability Who will do it? Deadline When will it be done? Monitoring How is it going? What progress has been made?
2.
3.
4.
5.
Share information Build support Receive feedback Build consensus Eliminate surprises
Presentation
Deliver a consistent message Gain understanding Elicit support Teach and share Receive ideas
Presentation Strategies
Practice
P A
P A D
Pie Chart
Run Chart
40 30 20 10 0
JULY
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
QI References
Brassard M, Ritter D. The Memory Jogger II. GOAL/QPC, Methuen, MA, 1994. Brassard M, Joiner BL. The Team Memory Jogger. GOAL/QPC and Joiner Associates Inc, Methuen, MA, 1995. Langley GJ, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, and Provost LP. The Improvement Guide. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1996. Scholtes PR. The Team Handbook. Joiner Associates, Inc. Madison, WI. 1988.
Creativity References
DeBono E. Serious Creativity. New York: Harper Collins, 1993. Higgens JM, 101 Creative Problem Solving Techniques, Winter Park, FL: New Management Publishing Company, 1994. Plsek PE, Creativity, Innovation, and Quality. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press, 1997. Van Oech R, A Whack on the Side of the Head. New York: Warner Books, 1983.
Additional Information
Patricia L. Baker RN, MS Director, Staff Development 248-465-7324 pbaker@mpro.org
Carol J. Grubba, RN, MSN, BC Project Manager, Continuing Education 248-465-7337 cgrubba@mpro.org
This material was prepared by MPRO, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Michigan, under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 7SOW-MI-CE-05-05
53