Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PowerPoint #1
Types of Theology
2
Systematic Theology
Seeks a coherent and unified understanding of what the Scriptures teach on a particular doctrine
Dogmatic Theology
Examines what the Church has taught in its authoritative creeds and doctrinal statements
Examines what the Church has taught over the centuries of its existence Seeks to develop and understand the teaching of Scripture and its application to the work and ministry of the Church
Historical Theology
Practical Theology
A specific approach to the NT only for theological truths Systematic theology is focused on doctrinal truths of the entire Bible. The purpose of NT theology is to harmonize and systematize theological truth from the different NT authors who had different purposes for writing. Practically, systematic theology is too broad of a subject to be covered in one class.
That discipline that works to clearly articulate the beliefs, practices and teachings of the apostolic Christian faith, derived primarily from the canonical writings of the New Testament as they expound Gods salvation in and through His Son, Jesus Christ. -J. Hernando
NT Theology is specialized because believers are under the New Covenant as found in the NT -Hebrews 8:13 The Church must have foundation truths for doctrine, correction, reproof and instruction - 2 Timothy 3:16 Godly living for the believer today is based upon NT teaching Titus 2:11-13 We must be able to discern between false doctrine and true doctrine - Titus 2:1 Christian ethics must be derived from a synthesis of NT teachings - 1 John 3:16-20
Hebrews 1:1 God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, 2 in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world. 3 And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high
Because each NT author had his own unique perspective at times Because no NT book is exhaustive of truth on any one doctrine Because each NT book addresses and reflects its own unique set of historical circumstances Discuss: Compare the four Gospels in just how they tell the story of Jesus Christ If we did not have the Gospel of John, what would we have missed?
OT Background to NT Theology
8
The promise of one born of a woman who would crush the head of Satan Genesis 3:15 The promise of the birth of a male child who would be the Mighty God Isaiah 9:6 The promise of a final sacrifice for sin Isaiah 53:6 The promise of a New Covenant Jer 31:3134 The promise of a coming kingdom Obadiah 1:21
The Canon: 39 Old Testament books, 27 New Testament books 66 Books of the Bible The words canon and canonical are used to describe books that are recognized as inspired by God and to be included as part of our Bible. The word canon comes from the Greek word that means measuring rule therefore signifying a rule or standard. The key problem is that there were many books which were written that claimed to be inspired but were excluded from our Bible.
Canonization is the dynamic historical process whereby the Church is led by the Spirit to recognize the content and character of the inspired New Testament writings with collateral authority alongside Old Testament writings.
After the ascension of Christ, the church did not have any books of the NT for at least 15 years until James was written in AD 45-50. The writing of the NT book, Revelation, was written about AD 90, a period of 60 years from the ascension of Christ. It is important to realize that the early church had to rely on the OT and oral teachings until books were written and circulated.
deemed to be inspired were widely circulated and gained acceptance. Christian leaders began to formulate lists of books considered inspired. By the 4th century the 27 books of the NT were universally affirmed to be the canon of the NT. The Council of Hippo in AD 393 and the Council in Carthage in AD 397 recognized the 27 books as canonical.
it reflect Gods nature and plan? Does it promote godliness? Is it doctrinally accurate? Does it reflect the work of the Holy Spirit?
was not an apostle but was written under Peters support. Luke was not an apostle but was a close associate of the apostle Paul.
books had the endorsement of a few, but were rejected. Books where the authorship was questioned, were later accepted because of universal approval. i.e. Hebrews
Its development was spontaneous and difficult to trace. No official group or spokesperson conferred canonical status on a particular writing. The Church was used (by God) to recognize the NT canon, not to create it.
Despite regional and local differences, the vast majority of churches recognized and accepted most of the 27 books that make up our NT by the end of the second century. Church councils affirmed what had already been accepted as the 27 canonical books of the NT.
JOHN 18:31-33 20 OY H H I O AN ... THE JEWS, "FOR US IT IS NOT PERMITTED TO KILL ANYONE," SO THAT THE WORD OF JESUS MIGHT BE FULFILLED, WHICH HE SPOKE SIGNIFYING WHAT KIND OF DEATH HE WAS GOING TO TO DIE. ENTERED THEREFORE AGAIN INTO THE PRAETORIUM PILATE AND SUMMONED JESUS AND HE SAID TO HIM, "THOU ART KING OF THE JEWS?
Rylands Papyrus P 52
117-138 A.D.
The NT has no final authority in faith. Anti-supernatural seeks to interpret NT in light of naturalism. i.e. demythologize Treats the NT as any other piece of religious literature. NT gives us a history of religion, not a theology. The Jesus of history must be separated from the Christ of faith i.e. Jesus Seminar
The Jesus Seminar is a group of about 150 biblical scholars and laymen founded in 1985 by Robert Funk and John Dominic Crossan under the auspices of the Westar Institute. The seminar uses votes with colored beads to decide their collective view of the historicity of the deeds and sayings of Jesus of Nazareth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Semin ar
The seminar treats the canonical Gospels as historical sources that represent Jesus' actual words and deeds as well as elaborations of the early Christian community and of the gospel authors. The fellows placed the burden of proof on those who advocate any passage's historicity. Unconcerned with canonical boundaries, they asserted that the Gospel of Thomas may have more authentic material than the Gospel of
An Example And the significance of Jesus is not to be found in his supposed placating of a wrathful God but in the fact that through him our authentic life becomes a possibility in fact for us only when we are freed from ourselves (Bultmann 1984, 30). http://people.bu.edu/wwildman/Weird WildWeb/courses/mwt/dictionary/mwt _themes_760_bultmann.htm
Gospels
Synoptics John
Acts Epistles
Pauline
General
Revelation
John
John,
Paul
Romans,
& 2 Peter
Others
Matthew,
1,2 Corinthians Galatians Ephesians Philippians Colossians 1,2 Thessalonians 1,2 Timothy Titus Philemon
Gospels
What
and Acts
Jesus did, what Jesus said, how the early church obeyed His commands
Pauline
Epistles
to specific churches and their
Instructions
Epistles
to the churches in general
Instructions
Revelation
Kingdom
Now
Pneumatology
Baptism, When
Eschatology
He comes
i.e.
development of Christology
Recognizes the occasional nature of NT writings Understands diversity in NT authors Seeks to harmonize convergent texts
The
Gospels give us the life and teachings of Jesus Christ Acts 1:1 Acts records how the early church obeyed His Great Commission in gathering followers of Jesus Christ Acts 1:8 The Epistles develop the doctrine of Christology and what it means to be a follower of Christ. They also develop how the Church is to make mature followers of Jesus Christ Romans 1:1-5 Revelation prepares believers for the return of Jesus Christ and how to live in