Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
S. No.
Insurers
Foreign Partners
Regn. No.
Date of Registration
---
512
01.09.1956
HDFC Standard
2
Standard Life Assurance, UK New York Life, USA Prudential Plc, UK Old Mutual, South Africa Sun Life, Canada American International Assurance Co., USA
ICICI Prudential
4
TATA AIG
7
SBI Life
8
BNP Paribas Assurance SA, France ING Insurance International B.V, Netherlands
111 114
29.03.2001 02.08.2001
ING Vysya
9
Bajaj Allianz
10
116 117
03.08.2001 06.08.2001
Metlife
11
Reliance
12
---
121
03.01.2002
Aviva
122
14.05.2002
13
Sahara
14
---
127
06.02.2004
Shriram
15
128
130 133 135 136 138 140 142 143
17.11.2005
14.07.2006 04.09.2007 19.12.2007 08.05.2008 27.06.2008 27.06.2008 26.12.2008 05.11.2009
Bharti AXA
16
Future Generali
17
IDBI Federal
18
Aegon Religare
20
DLF Pramerica
21
IndiaFirst
23
Edelweiss Tokio
24
147
12.05.2011
"Explore and enhance the quality of life of people through financial security by providing products and services of aspired attributes with competitive returns, and by rendering resources for economic development.
VISION
"A trans-nationally competitive financial conglomerate of significance to societies and Pride of India."
SWOT ANALYSIS
Strength :
Weakness :
It is the oldest and most well experienced player having a Pan India presence. LIC has a strong and very well developed distribution network. It is having a huge consumer base and is evolved as one of the most powerful brands of the country. It has a large product portfolio and claim settlement is easier to get.
Its employees and other staff are lethargic and least motivated to render prompt and sincere customer service. After sales customer grievance redressal mechanism is inefficient. Agents not taking into account the needs of people and promote policies having high commissions only. Very slow decision making process and internal problems between top management and lower cadre staff. The top management or bosses are mediocre and there is large scale corruption in main office.
Threats :
There is too much internal
discord.
Entry of new private players in
industry.
Red-tapism is very much
persistent.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the performance of LIC and
private insurance companies in India. To find out the performances of LIC and private insurance companies in each category (size, growth and efficiency) To compare grievance management of LIC and private insurance companies.
LIMITATIONS:
Could reach to a limited number of documents of
different insurance companies in regard to the management and other policies and resultant figures so as to identify the exact cause of their lag in performance.
Due to the limited time could not study all the
RESEARCH DESIGN :
Type of research design : Analytical and descriptive Research Data collection : Statistical Tools : Secondary Sources Weighted Mean Bar Graphs
RESEARCH PROCESS
Size 30% A. Total Premium 10% B. Total No. of Policies 10% C. Total No. of Branches 10% Growth 45% A. First Premium 15% B. Increase in No. of Policies 15% C. Growth in Market Share 15% Grievance Handling 25%
1. SIZE :
(A) TOTAL PREMIUM :
Rank Avg. Premium (in crore)
Points
LIC
164890.388
6.67
PRIVATE CO.
62362.678
0.5
3.33
Average premium of LIC is much more than that of all insurance companies altogether. LICs average premium of the last five years is nearly 2.6 times the average premium of the all other private insurance companies
Rank
Points
1 2
1 0.5
LIC is an undoubted leader in the field of average number of policies per year in the last five years. It is seen that private insurance companies are gaining momentum and are trying to defeat LIC in case of new insurances. Main reason behind LIC having such a large number of policies is the trust of a common man. LIC being a government agency has got a faith of indian mass. People are not yet prepared to give their savings in the hands of private players
28945 70380
2 1
0.5 1
When the matter of total number of branches comes its very much obvious that LIC, being the oldest existing insurance company in India, has the large number of offices in the country by any single insurance company. Since the number of private insurance companies is increasing, with continuous expansion in their business, now the number of branches of all private players has crossed the number of branches of LIC.
Points
0.5 1
LIC has attained lesser growth in the first year premium in past five years in comparison to the private players who have attained the growth of 35.73% in the last five years.
LIC
2 1
0.5 1
Private players are doing extremely well as they are increasing their customer base rapidly.
LIC
-2.424
2 1
0.5 1
LIC is still the market leader in insurance industry with 69.78 % share. But we cannot forget that in last five years market share of LIC has decreased. It was 81.9 % in year 2006-07 which came down to 69.78 % in 2010-11.
3. GRIEVANCE HANDLING :
Avg.% Grievance handled
LIC 70.475
Rank
Points
2 1
0.5 1
Grievance Handling is one of the major issues in any organization. It plays an important role in Insurance sector. People do attract towards companies who handles their grievances. Here we see that private players are much ahead of LIC when the matter comes to grievance management. In the last five years LIC has resolved only 70.475 % of cases brought in front of them while the percentage of cases resolved in case of private players is 81.975 %.
This shows that private players are very serious about their image and are working hard to provide the solution of the problems of the people as early as possible.
Grievance Handling
8.33
16.7
TOTAL POINTS
40
60
LIC and will certainly create a good business for themselves in the coming days.
LIC is very famous but private insurance companies are growing
at exceptionally fast pace. Private companies show due concern in grievance management and brings innovative schemes to attract the customers. Right now they are giving good competition to LIC and very soon they will give very tough competition to Life Corporation of India.