Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Symposia Series 2
Faculty Disclosure
Dr Knudtson: consultant/speakers bureau:
How confident are you addressing modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis with your patients?
62%
32%
6%
Learning Objectives
Assess the risk factors associated with osteoporosis Manage osteoporosis in the context of comorbidities Evaluate nonpharmacologic preventive approaches
Osteoporosis Defined
Osteoporosis, primary or secondary, is characterized
by compromised bone strength predisposing to an increased risk of fracture Osteoporosis = bone mineral density (BMD) 2.5 SD below young normal mean at hip or spine [WHO] Bone density = grams of mineral/area, volume Bone quality = architecture, turnover, damage accumulation, mineralization Bone strength = density + quality
SD = standard deviation; WHO = World Health Organization. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinicians Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Available at: www.nof.org/professionals/Clinicians_Guide.htm. Accessed April 22, 2008; NIH Consensus Statement. 2000;17:1-45
Prevalence of Osteoporosis*
Osteoporosis is a major health threat in the United States
10 million Americans have osteoporosis, 34 million are at risk Osteoporosis disproportionately affects Caucasian and Asian women; other races/ethnicities are also significantly affected Under-recognized problem in men In men, involvement of all races and ethnicities is significant In the United States, women and men aged 50 years 55% have low bone mass 8 million women and 2 million men have osteoporosis 1 of 2 white women, 1 of 5 men will suffer an osteoporosisrelated fracture Asian Americans with osteoporosis have same fracture risk as white persons
*Estimates based on 2000 census data. Ebeling PR. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1474-1482; National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinicians Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Available at: www.nof.org/professionals/Clinicians_Guide.htm. Accessed April 22, 2008.
20% 6% 2%
3 4
Osteoporotic Fractures Are More Common Than MI, Stroke, and Breast Cancer Combined
2,000,000
1,500,000*
1,500,000 250,000 hip 250,000 forearm 250,000 other sites 500,000 750,000 vertebral 0
1,000,000
Osteoporotic Fractures
MI
Stroke
Breast Cancer
*Annual incidence all ages; annual estimate women 29+; **annual estimate women 30+. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures: 2003. Available at: www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2003PWSecured.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2008; American Heart Association. Heart and Stroke Statistics: 2003 Update. Available at: www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/10590179711482003HDSStatsBookREV7-03.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2008; Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. Bone. 1995;17(5 Suppl):505S-511S.
81%
5%
2 3
4%
4
10
Endocrine disorders
Hypogonadal states GI disorders Hematologic diseases Miscellaneous conditions Medications
CHF = congestive heart failure; ESRD = end-stage renal disease; GI = gastrointestinal; MS = multiple sclerosis.
AACE Osteoporosis Task Force. Endocr Prac. 2001;7:293-312; National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinicians Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Available at: www.nof.org/professionals/Clinicians_Guide.htm. Accessed April 30, 2008.
11
4
3 2
5.18
1.19
1
0 n=
12
Pathophysiology of Osteoporosis
Bone Remodeling
Resting Bone
Activation Resorption
Osteoclasts
Bone
Reversal Formation
Osteoblasts
Bone Osteoid
13
Bone Mineralization
Pathophysiology of Osteoporosis
Fractures
Trauma
14
50 years
pronounced for non load-bearing horizontal trabeculae Decrease in connections between horizontal trabeculae Decrease in trabecular strength and increased susceptibility to fracture
80 years
15
Distal Radius
Femoral Neck
Favus MJ, ed. Primer on the Metabolic Bone Disease and Disorders of the Mineral Metabolism. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999:30-32.
16
Vertebrae
3000
Hip
2000
1000
Colles'
0 35
Riggs B. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1676.
45
Age (years)
55
65
75
85+
17
and protein throughout life Regular physical activity; load-bearing exercise Minimal alcohol intake Stop smoking Take measures to prevent falls Use of hip protectors by patients prone to falling
Ebeling PR. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1474-1482; National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinicians Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Available at: www.nof.org/professionals/Clinicians_Guide.htm. Accessed April 22, 2008.
18
Which of the following is true with regard to vitamin D and bone health?
1. Oral vitamin D reduces the risk of hip fractures by 26% 2. Oral vitamin D has no benefit in preventing falls in osteoporotic patients 3. Only vitamin D absorbed through the skin is effective in preventing osteoporosis 4. Vitamin D supplementation has no effect on nonvertebral fractures
88%
7%
Use your keypad to vote now!
1 2
2%
3
3%
4
19
reduces risk of Hip fracture by 26% Nonvertebral fracture by 23% Falls by 22% ( muscle strength, better balance) Optimal fracture prevention achieved with 25-hydroxyvitamin D mean serum level 100 nmol/L Best sources Milk, salmon, canned tuna, sardines, eggs, liver, sunlight
Bischoff-Ferrari HA , et al. JAMA. 2005;293:2257-2264.
20
February 2008 are based on the newly developed WHO 10year fracture risk model (FRAX) adapted to different population groups The FRAX algorithm Estimates the likelihood of a person breaking a bone due to osteoporosis during the next 10 years Provides a useful way to ensure that people at risk of fracture receive treatment Takes into account 9 clinical risk factors in addition to bone mineral density Available online at http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX
National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinicians Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Available at: www.nof.org/professionals/Clinicians_Guide.htm. Accessed April 22, 2008.
21
Secondary osteoporosis
Previous low-trauma
fracture
22
(% /10 Years)
70
5
50
0 -3
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 BMD T-Score -0.5 0 0.5 1
23
factors Signs and symptoms Physical examination Height assessment (with stadiometer) BMD testing Laboratory tests
Risk
24
Central Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA): Test of Choice for Diagnosing Osteoporosis
Benefits
accurate and precise Profiles all skeletal areas Requires little time Emits low dose of radiation Limitations AP spine measurement affected by vascular calcifications and spinal osteoarthritis Trabecular and cortical bone measured together
AP = anteroposterior.
25
Highly
Yes
Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Diseases/conditions/drugs causing osteoporosis Anyone receiving treatment for osteoporosis Anyone considering therapy for osteoporosis
Yes
Yes
Yes
USPTF. Ann Intern Med 2002 137:526-8; Leib, E. S., et al. J Clin Densitom 1998 7:1-6; Endocr Pract 7:293-312
26
T-Score
Number of SDs above or below sex-matched mean reference
value of young adults T-score = (BMD patient BMD young normal reference) SD young normal reference Comparison to peak bone mass Peak adult bone mass follows a normal distribution (bell curve). Low bone mass on initial DEXA does not necessarily mean bone loss. Person may be at low end of bell curve Used for adult diagnosis Each SD decrease = doubling of fracture risk
NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment. JAMA. 2000;285:785-795.
27
Which of the following applies to the WHO/NOF criteria for diagnosis of osteoporosis?
1. T-score > -1.0 2. T-score between -1 and -2.3 3. T-score is not a WHO/NOF criterion for diagnosing osteoporosis 4. T-score -2.5
15% 6%
Use your keypad to vote now!
1 2 3
77%
2%
4
28
Classification
T-score > -1.0 T-score -1.0 to -2.5 T-score -2.5 T-score -2.5 + fracture(s)
*Measured in T-scores. T-score indicates the number of standard deviations below or above the average peak bone mass in young adults.
Ebeling PR. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1474-1482; National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinicians Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Available at: www.nof.org/professionals/Clinicians_Guide.htm. Accessed April 22, 2008.
29
Fracture Rates Correlate With T-Scores: National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) Study
Data From More Than 163,000 Women
30
with either of the following Low bone mass (T-score -1 to -2.5, osteopenia) at femoral neck, total hip, or spine and 10-year hip fracture risk >3% 10-year all major osteoporosis-related fracture risk >20% based on US-adapted WHO FRAX model
National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinicians Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Available at: www.nof.org/professionals/Clinicians_Guide.htm. Accessed April 22, 2008.
31
long-term (3 months) glucocorticoid therapy Patients with low BMD (T-score 1) receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy Patients receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy who cannot tolerate HRT or had fractures during HRT
ACR = American College of Rheumatology; GIO = glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis; HRT = hormone replacement therapy.
American College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc Committee on Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:1496-1503.
32
Randomized, controlled trials with the bisphosphonate alendronate demonstrated reductions in risk of hip fracture at month 18 by:
1. 2. 3. 4.
46% 41%
12% 1%
Use your keypad to vote now!
1 2 3 4
33
Effects of Alendronate on Cumulative Incidence of Symptomatic Vertebral and Hip Fractures (FIT 1 and 2 Trials)
5
Vertebral
Cumulative Incidence
Hip -63%
PBO P <.014 ALN
Cumulative Incidence
4 3 2 1 0 0 6
-59%
PBO P <.001 ALN
*
12
*
18
* *
24 30
* *
0 0 6 12 18 24
* *
30 36
36
Months
Months
*P <.05
ALN = alendronate; FIT = Fracture Intervention Trial; PBO = placebo.
Black DM, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:4118-4124. 34
34
60%
(33%, 77%) P <.001
Placebo Risedronate 5 mg
12 10 8 6
48%
(7%, 71%) P = .029
4
2 0 Overall Aged 70 Years 2 Prevalent Fractures Low FN BMD Low LS BMD
35
Zoledronic Acid
HORIZON study
3-year study to decrease fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis Pivotal Fracture Trial (PFT) 3-year study to decrease fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis Efficacy 70% vertebral fractures, 40% hip fractures, 25% nonvertebral fractures
36
Zoledronic Acid Reduced Cumulative 3-Year Risk of Hip Fractures (Strata I + II)
3
41%*
0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
37
Disadvantages
Thromb. venous
Cardiovascular diseases
Stroke
Breast cancer
Advantages
38
Hip fracture
1
0 -1
1
0 -1
-2
0 12 24 36
-2
0 12 24 36
Months
P <.001 for all comparisons.
MORE = Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation.
Ettinger B, et al. JAMA. 1999;282:637-645.
Months
39
39
MORE: Reduction in New Vertebral Fractures Among Women Who Completed the Study
% of Patients With Incident Vertebral Fracture
25 20
Placebo Raloxifene hydrochloride 60 mg/d Raloxifene hydrochloride 120 mg/d
RR 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.6) RR 0.5 (95% CI, 0.6-0.9)
15 10
5 0
N = 6828
RR = relative risk.
Ettinger B, et al. JAMA. 1999;282:637-645.
40
40
25
15
10
80
90 100
2 (NS)
4 (NS)
7 (NS)
Placebo 100 IU
200 IU
400 IU
N = 511
Chesnut CH III, et al. Am J Med. 2000;109:267-276.
NS = nonsignificant
41
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2
Placebo
PTH = parathyroid hormone.
Neer RM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1434-1441.
PTH 20 g
42
42
Weekly Dosing
Zoledronic acid
Raloxifene Calcitonin Teriparatide
Zometa
Evista Miacalcin Forteo X
X
X X X X
PMO = postmenopausal.
National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinicians Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Available at: www.nof.org/professionals/Clinicians_Guide.htm. Accessed April 22, 2008. 43
43
What percent of patients will stop their medications within 6-12 months of initiation? 1. <10% 2. 10%-15% 3. 20%-30% 4. 40%-50%
58%
38%
1%
Use your keypad to vote now!
1
3%
2 3 4
44
medications suspend their medications within 6-12 months of initiation due to Side effects Lack of knowledge Reluctance to take regular medications
45
effects of discontinuing alendronate treatment after 5 years vs continuing treatment for 10 years Women who discontinued treatment after 5 years experienced a moderate decline in BMD, increase in biochemical markers, no higher fracture risk except clinical vertebral fractures
46
Osteonecrosis of Jaw
Osteonecrosis of jaw Potential complication of bisphosphonate Rare
occur after dental extraction Most cases occur in cancer patients Most cases associated with high-dose IV bisphosphonate treatment in metastatic cancer patients
60%
47
Case Study
48
57-year-old Asian woman Height: 5 ft 2 in; weight: 101 lb; BMI: 18.5 kg/m2 Postmenopausal for 5 years No HRT Medications: mesalamine for ulcerative colitis No known drug allergies Family history: mother had a hip fracture at age 76 years
49
for 5 years; ulcerative colitis, uses mesalamine; has used systemic steroids orally 3 or 4 times for limited periods of time Diet: balanced, except does not include dairy (lactose intolerant) Exercise: walks 20 minutes a day Smokes pack a day
1. No, she is <65 years of age 2. Yes, she is 5 years postmenopausal 3. Yes, she has multiple risk factors for osteoporosis
0% 2%
2
98%
Aged >70 years Menopause aged <45 years Hypogonadism Fragility fracture Hip fracture in parents Glucocorticoids Malabsorption High bone turnover Anorexia nervosa BMI <18 kg/m2 Immobilization Chronic renal failure Transplantation
Estrogen deficiency Calcium intake <500 mg/d Primary hyperparathyroidism Rheumatoid arthritis Ankylosing spondylitis Anticonvulsants Hyperthyroidism Diabetes mellitus Smoking Alcohol in excess
52
DEXA scan indicates T-score -1.9 lumbar spine; T-score -.9 femoral neck. Does this patient have osteoporosis?
59%
34%
7%
Use your keypad to vote now!
1 2 3
53
Diagnostic criteria* T-score > -1 T-score between -1 and -2.5 T-score -2.5 T-score -2.5 + fragility fracture(s)
*T-score = number of standard deviations below or above the average peak bone mass in
young adults.
National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinicians Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Available at: www.nof.org/professionals/Clinicians_Guide.htm. Accessed April 22, 2008.
54
93%
0%
Use your keypad to vote now!
1
7%
2 3
55
Calcium Intake
(mg/d)
NIH. Dietary Supplement Fact Sheet: Calcium. 2005. Available at:http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/calcium.asp. Accessed April 17, 2008. 56
56
and protein Regular physical activity Minimize alcohol intake Stop smoking Minimize risk of falls Recommend hip protectors for those prone to falls
57
by 47%-51% Prevention or treatment PMO Approved treatment men Approved treatment GIO Fracture efficacy (FIT and FOSIT trials) Year 1 nonvertebral fracture reduction: 47% Year 3 vertebral fracture reduction: 47% Year 3 hip fracture reduction: 51%
FOSIT = Fossa Intervention Trial.
Black DM, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:4118-4124; Pols HA, et al. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9:461-468.
58
40%-65% in a 3- to 5-year period Prevention or treatment of PMO Approved prevention or treatment of GIO Approved in treatment for men Dose: 5 mg/d or 35 mg every week or 75 mg 2 consecutive days a month Fracture efficacy (VERT and HIP trials) Year 3 vertebral fracture reduction: 41%-49% Year 1 vertebral fracture reduction: 65% Year 3 hip fracture reduction: 40%-60%
HIP = Hip Intervention Program; VERT = Vertebral Efficacy With Risedronate Therapy. Deal CL. Cleve Clin J Med. 2002;69:964,968-970,973-976; Harris ST, et al. JAMA. 1999;282:1344-1352; Reginster J, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:83-91.
59
~50% reduction in vertebral fractures by year 3 Bisphosphonate for PMO Dosing 150 mg once a month, MOBILE study 3 mg IV once every 3 months, DIVA study
BONE = Bone, Osteogenesis, Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug ; DIVA = Dosing IntraVenous Administration; MOBILE = Monthly Oral iBandronate In LadiEs.
Miller PJ. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;1315.
Efficacy:
60
Q&A
61
PCE Takeaways
62
PCE Takeaways
Osteoporosis is a preventable diseasenot a
condition of aging Technology for accurate bone density measurement is available Women and men at risk can be identified Safe and effective pharmacologic treatments are available Patient education is critical to encourage persistence with medication in the management of osteoporosis
63
How confident are you now in discussing the various modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis with your patients? 1. Very confident 2. Somewhat confident 3. Not at all confident
89%
10% 1%
Use your keypad to vote now!
1 2 3
64
2008
Symposia Series 2