The Army Plan

Purpose

• Develop strategic planning guidance

with senior leadership direction
• Prepare mid-term, mission-oriented planning
guidance using the strategic guidance
• Translate mission-oriented planning guidance into
functionally-oriented programming guidance

Goal --
Planning influencing the
02/23/09
Army’s Program, Budget 1
 Army Planning Guidance
Using MAPIT to Focus Analysis
Illustrative and
High level of resourcing but
low level of importance tonot
Importance (APGM)
Actual MDEP Analysis
Mission Area Capabilities
8
Most Important
Relative Resourcing of MDEP

7 FPMM
FPMC MDEPs
MDEPRequirement

FPHG

6 RJS1
RB12
5 FPLB FPSA
FPHC FPFE

4 MU17 FPSB FPTA FPFF

FPMJ RJL4
FPSS
3 FPDB
to Program

FPSN
FL6P FPFR
FPEF FPDT
FPDERG04 RH01
FL6Y FPMH
2 MT5Y
FPSM
FPHB
FPER
RA35
FPEP
FPMA MX5T
Relative

RJC5 FPDP
1 RF02
FPFB
FPSC
FPJBFPJC
FLTTRF01
FL8G
RD16 FPQFFPFP
FPEG
FPDH
FPDD
FPFJ
FPLK FPEH
FPEL
FPJA
RD15 RN04
FASP
FTRC
RA08 RD12
RJT7FPLCRJL7 FPLF FPDQ
FPLR
RK12
RL02
RL11
RL07
RL04
AR1R
RK01
SPDP
FPFD
E3RC
RA09
FPDG
FPEE
RK14
RD13RJC0 FL6Q
FPLE
FADI
RE04 RB03
FPQS RJS2
FL8D FPDL
RJT0
RK15
FPED
TAFM
RK13
RK17
FPLP
RL03
MSECRK16
FPFK
MXET
VARY
VTRD
RK10
RN13
RK02
RK11RJC7
RF03
RN08 RK20
MS4B
RK03
0

0 1 2 3 4 5
Relative
Relative MDEP Importance
Importance of MDEP to(MA)
Least Important
MDEPS Mission Area Capabilities High level of importance to
Mission Area Capabilities but
low level of resourcing
02/23/09 2
 The Army Plan
and Program - Budget Cycle
Jan 00 Apr 00 Jul 00 Sep 00 Jan 01 Apr 01 Jul 01 Sep 01
Jan 02
PresB PresB
POM PB ud POM PB ud
issue D FY02- issue D FY 03
s 03 s
POM BES POM BES
FY02- FY02- FY FY 03
07 03 03
POM BES prep POM prep - BES prep POM
prep 07 pre
FY02-03 Update FY03 p
FY02-07 FY03-07
FY 04-
Section III. 09
APGM
(-- Dec 2000) The
Section II.
Army Plan
Army
Guidance Plan
(-- Oct 2000) FY03-17
Section I.
Army Strategic Planning Update
Guidance
02/23/09 (-- Jun 2000) 3
 The Army Plan
Background
F O R C E
For Official Use Only

XXI

The Army Plan

THE
FY 1998 – 2013 (U) ARMY
PLAN
FY 2000 - 2015 (U)
17
75

December 1995

Classified By: LTG Blackwell, DCSOPs, HQDA

Reason: 1.5(b)
Declassify on: December 2005
For Official Use Only
24 March 1998

TAP FY98-13 TAP FY00-15 TAP FY02-17

• Some strategic guidance • First “Reengineered” TAP • Replaced 10 with 7 new
in Sections 1 - 4 • Examined and used best Mission Areas
• Programming guidance practices including • Applied transformation
in Section 5, across other Services & OSD strategy
14 sub-sections • Organized into 3 Sections • Produced draft ASPG
• Included 10 Mission Areas • Produced draft APG --
• Approved by used TAA/MTOFs
Sec Army & CSA • Produced approved APGM

02/23/09 4
 The Army Plan
Overview
Section I
Army Strategic Planning
Guidance (ASPG) DAMO-SS
Feedback Section II
• Relates National, OSD, and Army Planning Guidance
Joint strategic guidance (APG) DAMO-ZR
• Provides Army leadership’s • Expands upon Mission
vision and guidance Areas from ASPG
• Identifies capabilities to
accomplish missions
SA & CSA
approve each Section Section II
Section III Feedback
Army
Army Programming Guid.
Planning
Memo (APGM) PAED
Guidance
Section II
• Uses capabilities from
- Annex -
APG
• Identifies objectives and
resource tasks by PEG
02/23/09 5
 The Army Plan
Incorporates Transformation Strategy
“WHAT WE WILL LOOK LIKE” Section Long-term strategy
I. ‘sets azimuth’
Army The ASPG
12 OCT 99 Army Section Mid-term capabilities
Vision END STATE II.
Plan APG

FY02-17 Section Mid-term

“HOW WE WILL GET THERE” III. program guidance
APGM
Army 1 NOV 99 (DRAFT)
Strategy END STATE
GOALS Program
(ASPG)
LINKAGE TO END STATE Objective
GENERAL LOGIC Memorandum
GENERAL PHASING
FY 02-07

“WHO DOES WHAT BY WHEN”

Transform 15 JAN 00
RESPONSIBILITIES / TERMS OF REFERENCE
BDE TRANSFORMATION ation
MILESTONES
Campaign METRICS / ASSESSMENT PROCESS
MONITOR MECHANISM
NOT PROGRAMMATIC,Plan
BUT FEEDS PROGRAMMATICS
02/23/09 6
 The Army Plan Strategic Nuclear War

Covers the Spectrum… Regional

Conventional
Tactical
Nuclear
Deter Conflict War
Aggression Limited International
Promote Reduce & Coercion Conventional
Regional Potential Conflict

Stability Conflicts Counter-

War
& Threats Raids Strikes Insurgency
Counter
Terrorism
a t
mb
Domestic

o
Disaster Relief

Domestic
Civil Support
Security Assistance
Arms C
Spectrum of Deploy,
Control
Peace
Building Fight, and
Environmental
Operations Peace Support Win
Making Homeland MTWs
Defense
Conduct

Spectrum of Peace
SSC
Operation
s
Provide Peace
Counter
Domesti Drug
Enforcement
7 Mission Areas --
Nation Show of
c Assistance Force Sanctions Responsive &
Support Non-Combatant
Enforcement
Dominant
Humanitarian Peace
Evacuation
Keeping
Occupations
across the
 DCSOPS
Army Planning Guidance
MTOF Process Considers MTOF Scenarios
s
CINC TAP ProcesSection
s II
Intent
rio Army
e na Strategic
e sc Theater
Us Objectives - Planning
Mission Task Organized T OF
Strategic
Force Theater s e M JTL sks Guidanc
Concept U U Ta e- Annex -
(MTOF) Regional P
Scenarios TA
Essential in
Peace Enforcement - Balkans UJTL
Noncombatant Evacuation J TL Tasks
U
Operation - Nigeria e
Peacekeeping - Peru/Ecuador Us Conditions
Peacekeeping - Sinai
Humanitarian Assistance - Congo
Maritime Interdiction Operation - Iran Standards
Counter Drug - Columbia
Consequence Management TAA
National Missile Defense TOF Force
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Structure
Disaster Relief
Universal Joint
Base Engagement Force MTOF
Task List
Base Generating Force
Major Theater War
(UJTL)
 Army Planning Guidance
Uses “METL-like” Structure

7 Mission Areas

• Promote Regional Stability Section II

• Reduce Potential Conflicts
Mission Area Structure
and Threats
Mission Area (definition)
• Deter Aggression and Coercion • Objectives
• Conduct SSC Operations – Tasks
• Deploy, Fight, and Win MTWs • Capabilities
• Support Homeland Defense – Performance
Standards
• Provide Domestic Support

Prioritizes

02/23/09 9
 Army Planning Guidance
Provides Capabilities-Based Planning
Planning Programming/Budgeting
A Task may be required
in more than one Mission Area; and Reducing or eliminating resources for
a Capability may be required in a Task or Capability in one Mission Area,
more than one Task does not change requirement for the same
Task or Capability in another MA

MA1 MA2 MA1 MA2

Task1 T 2 T 3 Task1 T 4 T 5 Task1 T 2 T 3 Task1 T 4 T 5

ask ask ask ask ask ask ask ask

Cap1 Cap2 Cap3 Cap1 Cap4 Cap5 Cap1 Ca 2 Ca 3 Cap1 Ca 4 Ca 5

p p p p

Capability-Based Planning involves--

• Identifying all required capabilities to accomplish each Mission Area
• And, if a later decision alters a mission or reduces or eliminates resources
for task or capability in a Mission Area, this decision
does not change requirement for capability in other Mission Area
 Army Planning Guidance
Mission Area Wiring Diagram
DCSOPS
ODCSOP & Secretariat (LTG Ellis)

Co-leads at
Mission Area Level ADCSOPS DAMO-ZR
(MG Kensinger) (COL Palmatier)

DAMO-SS DAMO- DAMO-OD

(General Officer) (General Officer) (General Officer)

PRS PCT MTW SHD SSC DAC PDS

DAMO-SSP DAMO-SSD DAMO-SSW DAMO-SSW DAMO- DAMO-ODO DAMO-ODS
COL ____ COLBrown COL Brown COL Brown COL ____ LTC Scott COL Fitton

DUSA-IA DUSA-IA ASA(ALT) ASA(M&RA) ASA(M&RA) ASA(M&RA) SAUS

COL Morgan COL Grabowski Mr. Damstetter COL Demasi LTC Hersey COL Smoot VACANT

MAs provide a deliberate link from strategic guidance to essential capabilities.

02/23/09 11
 Army Planning Guidance
Linking Capabilities To Programming
Mission Area To Programming Integration Tool (MAPIT)
provides the means for linking and defining the importance
of a specific MDEP to a specific Capability

Mission Area Hierarchy PEG Hierarchy

MSN AREA 1 PEG 1

OBJ 1 OBJ 1

Task 1 Task 2

Sub-OBJ 1 Sub-OBJ 2

TASK 1 TASK 2 TASK 3 TASK 4

Capability 1 Capability 2 Capability 3

MDEP A MDEP C

MDEP B MDEP D

Planning to Programming relationship --

• A Mission Area Capability may receive resources from many MDEPs
• An MDEP may support many Mission Area Capabilities
02/23/09 12
 The Army Plan
The Intent
Use Operationally Focused Planning
To Shape and Defend the Army Program
TAP
Section III
Army
THE WHITE
HOUSE
DECEMBER
Programming The Army Vision:
1999 Guidance
Memorandum Soldiers on
(APGM)
point
Man Tng Eq Org Sust Inst
TAP for the Nation
Section I
Army
Promote Regional Stability transforming
Strategic
Planning
Reduce Potential Conflicts and Threats the most
Guidance Army
Deter Aggression and Coercion respected
(ASPG) Planning POM:
Transformation Guidance: Conduct Smaller Scale Contingency Ops Capabilities Army in the
Strategy Capabilities
Deploy, Fight & Win Major Theater Wars
Resourced world into a
Required
strategically
TAP Support Homeland Defense
Section II responsive
Army Provide Domestic Support
Planning force that is
Guidance
(APG)
dominant
Mission Areas
and Capabilities Army POM & across the
OSD Issues
MDEPs Resourced and
Budget Estimate fullArmy
spectrum
Answers
 Army Planning Guidance
Using MAPIT to Focus Analysis
Illustrative and
High level of resourcing but
low level of importance tonot
Importance (APGM)
Actual MDEP Analysis
Mission Area Capabilities
8
Most Important
Relative Resourcing of MDEP

7 FPMM
FPMC MDEPs
MDEPRequirement

FPHG

6 RJS1
RB12
5 FPLB FPSA
FPHC FPFE

4 MU17 FPSB FPTA FPFF

FPMJ RJL4
FPSS
3 FPDB
to Program

FPSN
FL6P FPFR
FPEF FPDT
FPDERG04 RH01
FL6Y FPMH
2 MT5Y
FPSM
FPHB
FPER
RA35
FPEP
FPMA MX5T
Relative

RJC5 FPDP
1 RF02
FPFB
FPSC
FPJBFPJC
FLTTRF01
FL8G
RD16 FPQFFPFP
FPEG
FPDH
FPDD
FPFJ
FPLK FPEH
FPEL
FPJA
RD15 RN04
FASP
FTRC
RA08 RD12
RJT7FPLCRJL7 FPLF FPDQ
FPLR
RK12
RL02
RL11
RL07
RL04
AR1R
RK01
SPDP
FPFD
E3RC
RA09
FPDG
FPEE
RK14
RD13RJC0 FL6Q
FPLE
FADI
RE04 RB03
FPQS RJS2
FL8D FPDL
RJT0
RK15
FPED
TAFM
RK13
RK17
FPLP
RL03
MSECRK16
FPFK
MXET
VARY
VTRD
RK10
RN13
RK02
RK11RJC7
RF03
RN08 RK20
MS4B
RK03
0

0 1 2 3 4 5
Relative
Relative MDEP Importance
Importance of MDEP to(MA)
Least Important
MDEPS Mission Area Capabilities High level of importance to
Mission Area Capabilities but
low level of resourcing
02/23/09 14
 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF MAPIT

Web-based, User Friendly Interface Provides: MAPIT generates the interface

•Hierarch •Rating •General Information and stores inputs by using:
• Current Planning Database (TAP MAS)
y Bars
•Definitions •Reports •Help • Current Programming Database (PROBE)

Quality Function Deployment

(QFD):
•Used to determine the relative
importance of MDEPs.
•Systematic, straight forward, well
defined approach.

Prioritized MDEPs
(Based on Mission Area)

02/23/09 15
 The Army Plan
and Program - Budget Cycle
Jan 00 Apr 00 Jul 00 Sep 00 Jan 01 Apr 01 Jul 01 Sep 01
Jan 02
PresB PresB
POM PB ud POM PB ud
issue D FY02- issue D FY 03
s 03 s
POM BES POM BES
FY02- FY02- FY FY 03
07 03 03
POM BES prep POM prep - BES prep POM
prep 07 pre
FY02-03 Update FY03 p
FY02-07 FY03-07
FY 04-
Section III. 09
APGM
(-- Dec 2000) The
Section II.
Army Plan
Army
Guidance Plan
(-- Oct 2000) FY03-17
Section I.
Army Strategic Planning Update
Guidance
02/23/09 (-- Jun 2000) 16
 The Army Plan
Summary
• Provides operationally mission-oriented
planning guidance
• Incorporates Transformation Strategy
• Integrates SECRETARIAT, ARSTAF
and MACOM inputs
• Links Planning Capabilities to
Programming MDEPs

ADCSOPS support is essential Soldiers on point ...

for TAP success
02/23/09 17