Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Early Period
Communities, mostly rural, left to manage their own
affairs
Panchayats the earliest form of local institutions
introduced
"Panchayats" went into disuse rapidly
16
British Period
Local government legislation on a wider scale started with the Municipal Act of 1850
British Period
Punjab - establishment of municipal committees
taken up in 1862
Institutions were rather informal Inhabitants were given the right to constitute wards as they desired Functions: drainage, water supply, lighting, street pavement, sanitation, etc.
18
British Period
Punjab Municipal Act, 1867 Constitution of municipal committees with power to levy taxes Punjab Municipal Act 1873 - municipalities and towns were classified with varying powers Municipal committees of the third class were not independent Comprised appointed members - take action only with the approval of DC
19
British Period
Lord Ripon's Resolution of 1882, which inter alia stated:
"It was not primarily with a view to improvement in administration, that this measure is put forward and supported. It is chiefly designed as an instrument of political and popular education."
British Period
Punjab Municipal Act 1884 - committees were made corporate bodies Vested with powers to levy taxes Appointment as well as election Municipal committee headed by a President Election subject to the approval of the government
21
British Period
Punjab Municipal Act was re-enacted in 1891 Under the Bombay Municipal Act, 1884, 35 municipal committees were constituted in
Sind
Under the Indian Councils Act, 1892 - the local
British Period
Pace of development of rural local governments increased after report of the Famine Commission of 1880 and Lord Ripon's Resolution of 1882 Punjab District Board Act 1883
British Period
Punjab Municipal Act 1911 - a comprehensive piece of legislation Continued till its repeal under Municipal
Administration Ordinance 1960 Lahore Corporation Act 1941 - transfer of most of the executive powers to an appointed Executive Officer Sindh Municipal Act 1933
27
Conclusions British Period and LG System Local governments were formed in a top-down
witnessed
1959 to 1970 Basic Democrats (BDs) were in control of local
Government Institutions
Political parties were not involved
BDs were used as their substitute
1972
Punjab Local Government Act 1975 - which remained in force
up to 1979
No elections were held - affairs of Local Councils looked after
by Administrators
From 1971 to 1979 elected Local Councils did not exist
Affairs of Local Government were managed by the
Government officials
34
development process
Development work in the districts entrusted to District Councils
(IRDP)(1972)
People Works Program (1973)
36
37
BDs SYSTEM
Hierarchical system of four/five linked tiers Lowest tier, the Union Council, covered a village population of 8000 to 15000 people Comprised Basic Democrats elected on the basis of adult franchise Other tiers - some members elected indirectly by these Basic Democrats Other official members nominated by the Government Officials as Chairmen (ACs, Tehsildar, DC, Commissioner)
40
BDs SYSTEM
Bureaucracy controlling authority Power to:
Quash the proceedings Suspend resolutions passed or orders made by any local body Prohibit the doing of anything proposed to be done To require the local body to take some action
41
BDs SYSTEM
Basic Democracies Scheme not democracy in reality Ayubs concept of controlled democracy Paternalistic colonial view of guardianship Basic Democracies system had a pronounced rural bias in terms of representation and flow of resources Rural areas given access to development resources through the Rural Works Programme
42
BDs SYSTEM
Union Council the most important tier Each council had between four and fifteen elected members Each representative to the council elected by a constituency of roughly 1000 persons
Appointed members - not exceeding "more than one-half of the total number" of the elected members DCs nominated
43
Union Councils
Total Union Council member- ship of 15 with
10 elected members
Town and Union Committees in urban centers
Union Councils
Union Councils were given developmental functions
45
UC Functions
Health, safety and comfort of the inhabitants Supervision of the operations of village police force Assist government revenue officials Responsible for agricultural, industrial and community development Carry out functions assigned by the government or delegated by the District Council
47
industrial
community
development projects
48
Union Councils
Council members hold office for five years May be disqualified for:
Misconduct and persistent absence from meetings If they became government officials Had a pecuniary interest in affairs of the councils
DC could remove members he appointed A majority vote of the next higher council may remove elected members
49
Tehsil Council
Above the Union Councils is the Tehsil Council
Tehsil Council
Additional persons are appointed Appointees not more than the representative members No direct election by the people Chairman of Tehsil Council was AC
51
52
53
Divisional Council
Chairman - Commissioner Composition:
Chairmen of District Council Representatives of government departments Municipal bodies and Cantonment Boards An equal number of appointments made by the Government coming from Chairmen of U.C.
Divisional Council is primarily a coordinating body Proposals for development schemes passed on to the Provincial Development Advisory Council
55
Conclusions
Paternalistic Model Bureaucratic Control Regime Legitimacy Issue Rural Urban Divide
57
58
Constitutional Provisions
The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (Article 7) recognizes local authorities (with power to tax) as organs of the State Article 32 provides that "The State shall encourage local government institutions composed of elected representatives of the areas concerned and in such institutions special representation will be given to peasants, workers and women"
59
The 1979 system was introduced to establish a platform for socio-economic development and to encourage local leadership at the grass-root level in villages and urban areas, so that the common man could get relief from his day to day problems. Union and District Councils were provided for the rural areas and Town Committees, Municipal Corporations and Municipal Committees for the urban areas. In Union Councils, 1,000 to 1,500 people elected one representative. The size of the Union Council varied with the population of the area. The chairman and vice-chairman of the Union Council were elected by the council. Elections for Local Councils were held regularly under 1979 Ordinance;79 to 1991 .
The constitution of the Local Councils and its total Membership after 1991 Election was as under:Sr.No
a b c d e f
No. of Members
156 495 1848 2161 43776 1807 5024
Elections were required to be held in 1994. Following Local Councils were constituted but due to rivalry between the Provincial and Federal Government (Wayne + Wattoo) (Benazir Bhutto), the Local Councils were dissolved and new Elections were not held:a) Metropolitan Corporation, Lahore b) Corporations c) Municipal Committees = = = One 07 74
d) Town Committees
e) Union Councils f) Zila Councils Total
= 135
= 2485 = 34
= 2736
Under the 1979 law, Government was not empowered to dissolve the Local Councils without announcing the schedule of fresh Elections.
Lahore High Court held that the Local Councils could not remain under suspension indefinitely; fresh Elections
In view the above judgments, the Punjab Local Government Ordinance was amended on 04.05.1994 to nullify the effect of judgment. Accordingly, Section-26 (A) was added in the Ordinance.
By virtue of the provisions of Section-26 (a) the powers of the Local Councils were usurped ; All powers and functions of the Local Councils were to be exercised by the Administrator so appointed, till such time the newly elected representatives were to be not inducted in to their offices. The Deputy Commissioners were appointed as Administrators of the Zila Councils and Independent Administrators for Municipal Corporations. The Additional Deputy Commissioners of the Districts as Administrator of Municipal Committees ; Municipal Committees other than District Headquarters were placed under respective Assistant Commissioners. The Project Managers of LG Dep't were notified as its Administrators of Union Councils. These arrangements remained intact up to 20.5.1998.
Sr.No
a b c d e Metropolitan Corporation Municipal Corporations Municipal Committees Town Committees Zila Councils Total
No. of Members
301 765 3062 3142 3455 10725
Elections to the above councils were held in may 1998; No elections were held in 2870 Union Councils and the Project Managers continued to act as Administrators. The people of rural areas at grass root level were deprived of their rights for over six years(1994-99)
The
There was lack of coordination between nation building departments and local councils, affecting their resource mobilization capability. Taxes of local councils were auctioned ;collecting by contractors, resulted in Leakages and harassment to public. Collection of taxes levied by Union Councils depended upon the efforts of their paid Secretaries. These employees were extremely under-paid and had very little facilities which hampered their effectiveness. Both District and Union Councils were empowered to levy taxes in rural areas but some of their taxes over- lapped which caused confusion and also affected the pace of collection of local taxes. For example, the District and Union Councils had common levies such as tax on annual rental value of buildings and lands, market fees, fees at fairs, agricultural shows, industrial exhibitions etc., fee for slaughtering of animals, fees for licenses, tolls on roads and bridges and so on.
There were a number of taxes for which local bodies, both urban and rural, had been empowered but these had not been imposed by the local councils due to some practical area problems. If the taxes permissible under the statutes were imposed by local bodies, the financial crisis which many local councils were facing may have been resolved.
5 6
10 11 12 13
15
Members of the local councils did not have any proper forum to maintain contact with each other. Little peoples participation in development planning Top down approach in planning
16
17
74