Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1.
What are the most significant factors affecting competition in the metal container industry? What strategy does Crown Cork have for competing in this industry? What advantages, if any. Does a firm the size of Crown Cork have over American Can and Continental Can? How do to you explain the comparisons shown in Exhibit 3 in the case? What recommendations would you make to management?
2.
3.
4.
1.
Identification of industry characteristics. Identification and analysis of Crown Cork & Seals strategy. An explanation of Crown Cork & Seals performance relative to its competitors. Identification of the major problem facing Crown Cork & Seal. Development of recommendations for dealing with Crown Cork & Seals problems.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Suppliers
Manufacturers
Customers
There are very few suppliers These suppliers are large, powerful
Supplier
Manufacturer
Few firms Growth is slow It is a very large market Tough price competition Fixed costs are relatively high Little product differentiation Little value added High transportation costs Close substitutes exist Two-piece cans have brought change to the industry
Large and
Customers
1.
The metal can manufacturers are caught between strong suppliers and customers.
2.
3.
4.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
2.
3.
4.
these Manufacturing Are all of particular many smaller plants with extra can-forming line market these segments strategies Research and development make so follower strategy are obvious much sense ? Marketing ?
use of sales engineers International emphasis on less-developed countries Finance reduce debt and buy back shares
5.
6.
1.
Beer and soft drinks represent growth areas in the metal container industry.
2.
Although beer and soft drinks face threats from aluminum, these market segments face only minimal threats from other materials such as fiber foil, plastic, or glass.
3.
Selling per se is done rather infrequently in the metal container industry and can probably be handled by a few sales executives with a lot of help from top management.
These countries are most likely to make the most of Crown Cork & Seals entire product range, beginning with crowns and gradually moving up to three piece and two-piece metal cans.
2.
3.
4.
Second: Diversification brings with it the risk of neglecting the core business.
Third: This neglect can be especially harmful if there is technological change in the industry.
The retirement of John Cannelly The banning of aerosol containers that use fluorocarbons Legislative regulation of nonreturnable containers
1.
The strategy is indeed risky. Crown sees itself as being in the tin-plate container business for aerosol and beverage cans. Broader definitions tin-plate containers, metal containers, or packaging imply less risk for the company. On the other hand, Crown has been earning above-average returns. DO these returns justify the risks?
2.
Recommendations to radically change Crown Cork & Seals strategy - moves into different types of materials and markets - diversify from Crowns narrow base in metal cans
2.
Political Action/Lobbying
- Crown Cork & Seal should support the efforts of its trade association to prevent the ban on fluorocarbons and - to prevent the enactment of legislation regulating use of nonreturnable cans
3.
I like to end the case and finally with a discussion of some broad questions:
1.
Has Connelly chosen an appropriate balance between risk and return in his corporate strategy? Can you make this or any other business strategy risk-free? Will Crown Corm & Seal become another Head Ski or Volkswagen? Would you bet against the future success of Crown Cork & Seal?
2.
3.