Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Outline
Need for traffic solutions Possible solutions Intelligent Transportation Systems
3.50
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00 1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
Year
From the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Statistics 2003
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 1982 1990 Year 1994 2000 New York, NYNortheastern, NJ Boston, MA Denver, CO Los Angeles, CA Seattle-Everett, WA
Options
Construct new roads
Covered in geometric design Not likely to happen on a large scale
Reduce Traffic
Travel demand management Alternative transportation
Option 1: Construction
Highway Construction Cost Sampling
Project Route 3, North Boston I-4 Tampa to Orlando I-5 Oregon US 26 Sunset Hwy. Oregon US 12 near Walla Walla River US 101 on Olympic Peninsula Total Cost $395.0 million $403.0 million $30.0 million $10.6 million $36.4 million $1.8 million Lane-Miles 42 73 5.16 2.24 25 0.8 Cost per Lane-Mile $9.4 million $5.5 million $5.8 million $4.8 million $1.5 million $2.2 million
But significant new rail capacity will face the same hurdles as new highway capacity.
CEE 320 Winter 2006
Incidents can comprise 50% of peak period congestion. 1 min delay in clearance = 4 to 5 min of traffic backup. Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents than by recurring peak period congestion.
Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents than by recurring peak period congestion.
Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents than by recurring peak period congestion.
Highway Capacity
Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents than by recurring peak period congestion.
Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents than by recurring peak period congestion.
ATIS: trafficgauge
WAP Traffic
www.wiresoft.net/traffic/seattle
An Example of APTS
http://busview.its.washington.edu/busview_launch.jsp?maps=gif
http://www.busmonster.com
CEE 320 Winter 2006