Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Theories that explain leadership effectiveness in terms of SITUATIONAL MODERATOR VARIABLES are called contingency theories. The central idea was that effective leadership was dependent on a mix of factors. The following are the contingency leadership theories: Fiedlers least preferred coworker Path-goal theory Situational theory Normative theory Substitute theory for leadership
Situational variables
Situational variables -relationship between leader LPC score and effectiveness depends on a situation favorability. They are Leader-Member relations Position Power Task structure
# Leader-Member Relations Task structure Leader's Position- Most Effective power leader
1
2 3 4 5
Good
Good Good Good Poor
Structured
Structured Unstructured Unstructured Structured
Strong
Weak Strong Weak Strong
Low LPC
Low LPC Low LPC High LPC High LPC
6
7 8
Poor
Poor Poor
Structured
Unstructured Unstructured
Weak
Strong Weak
High LPC
High LPC Low LPC
Conceptual weakness
LPC does not work in group performance Its more of an attitude but not an option for improving leadership. This neglects the MEDIUM LPC scorers.
The path-goal theory, also known as the pathgoal theory of leader effectiveness was developed by ROBERT HOUSE. It explains how the behavior of a leader influences the satisfaction and performance of the subordinates. the need for leaders to make rewards contingent on the accomplishment of objectives and to aid group members in attaining rewards by clarifying the paths to goals and removing obstacles to performance.
Leadership styles
There are 4 primary types of leadership styles in this theory;
1. Directive Leadership: The leader explains the performance goal and provides specific rules and regulations to guide subordinates toward achieving it. Supportive Leadership: The leader displays personal concern for subordinates. This includes being friendly to subordinates and sensitive to their needs. Achievement-oriented Leadership: The leader emphasises the achievement of difficult tasks and the importance of excellent performance and simultaneously displays confidence that subordinates will perform well. Participative Leadership: The leader consults with subordinates about work, task goals, and paths to resolve goals. This leadership style involves sharing information as well as consulting with subordinates before making decisions.
2.
3.
4.
Situational variables
Conceptual weakness
It mainly depends on the expectancy theory which does not take the emotional reactions into consideration. The expectancy and valence may vary from people to people and change from time to time.
Normative Theory
importance of individual versus group decisions (input and participation). The importance of time-driven versus developmentdriven decisions (time-pressure and quality of decision).
Situation Theory
Conceptual weakness.
The maturity level may regress also in case of any emotional personal strategy. There is no specific time limit for the shift from one maturity level to next.
Kerr and Jermier developed this model in 1978. Substitutes for Leadership-Characteristics of the task, subordinates, or the organization that replace the need for a leader.
-Subordinates
Ability, knowledge, experience, training, independence, professional orientation, indifference to rewards Clarity and routine, methodology, feedback, intrinsic satisfaction Formalization, flexibility, support, cohesiveness
-Task
-Organization
Leadership styles
There is also a concept of NEUTRALISER, where a leader is prevented from acting in a specific way.
Intervening variables --
Path-Goal theory
--
Instrumental, supportive, participative Achievement Task behavior, Relations behavior. Decision tree procedures Instrumental , supportive
--
--
--
Many aspects
Thank you!!!
?????