Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
external forces (e.g. constraints from suppliers, customer needs) internal forces (e.g. org growth, office politics, restructuring)
Loss of job Reduction of career prospects Down grading of work Effects in pay Loss of status - empires Reduction in responsibility or job interest Need to learn new skills New and unknown bosses New and known (!) bosses Break up of established work groups Transfer to new, unknown (known!) locations or departments
Loss of rewards
Organisational change occurs when: forces for change strengthen restraining forces lessen, or both processes occur simultaneously
1. Define problem (current state) and target situation (target state). 2. List forces working for and against the desired changes. 3. Rate the strength of each force. 4. Draw diagram (length of line denotes strength of the force). 5. Indicate how important each force is. 6. How to strengthen each important supporting force? 7. How to weaken each important resisting force? 8. Identify resources needed. 9. Make action plan: timings, milestones, responsibilities.
Look for closed attitudes. Look for an entrenched culture. Look for rigid structures and systems. Look for counterproductive change dynamics. Assess the overall resistance to change by:
examining to what extent the various forces of resistance are correlated with one another. describing the resistance threshold in terms of power and resources needed to deal with the resistance.
WHY TO USE?
Force-field analysis focuses our attention on ways of reducing the hindering forces and encouraging the positive ones.
education & communication participation & involvement facilitation & support negotiation & agreement manipulation & co-optation explicit and implicit coercion
Style
Means/context
Benefits
Problems
Circumstances of effectiveness
Participation
Increasing ownership of a decision or process May improve quality of decisions Process is guided/controlled But involvement takes place
Intervention/ manipulation
Direction
Coercion/edict
Change agent retains coordination/contr ol: delegates aspects of change Use of authority to set direction and means of change Exploit use of power through edict or imposition of change
Risk of lack of acceptance and ill-conceived strategy Least successful unless crisis
Transformational change
Economic Shareholder oriented Money incentives Layoffs Downsizing Restructuring Organisational Capability Softer Culture change Emphasis on individual & organisational learning
Stories
Members of the organisation tell these to insiders and outsiders. The history of the organisation is embedded in the present through important past events and personalities, including mavericks that deviate from the norm.
Symbols
These are demonstrated by the language and terminology used in the organisation. They include logos, offices, cars and titles.
Control Systems
These are measurement and reward systems that monitor activities designated as important.
Power Structures
These are most likely to be considered as integral to the nature of the paradigm. Key groups are likely to be associated with an organisations core assumptions and beliefs.
Organisational Structure
These are more informal ways in which the organisation works. Structures are likely to reflect power.
The Paradigm
These are the taken for granted assumptions about the organisation. They partly appear in Mission Statements and other documents but it would be a misrepresentation to say that these were the paradigm.
PARADIGM NHS is a Good Thing Public service Free at point of delivery Clinicians values Providers know Acute sector superior best Ours
POWER Fragmented :- professional - doctors bodies - senior clinicians Old Boy network Politicians
FROM WHAT IS
TO WHAT IS NEEDED
There are three issues that managers leading change need to address Major change requires a shift in the underlying culture of the organisation and therefore the attitudes and behaviors of the employees
If change implementation efforts are to be successful, they need to be designed to fit the organisational context, that is, they need to be context sensitive. Change is about changing people, not organizations. Organizations change when the managers and employees change their way of doing business
A culture web represents culture as an interlinked set of organisational subsystems in which the paradigm drives the visible manifestations of culture, such as the organisational symbols, routines and rituals, stories, control systems and structures
Changing individuals requires considerable investment, for example in communication, education, training and support. That is why this article talks of paths of change
Routines are 'the way things are done round here'. These are powerful instruments to blocking the change process.
There is a need to understand that the 'mundane tools that involve the creation and manipulation of symbols over time have impact to the extent that they re-shape beliefs and expectations' (Tom Peters, 1987) The rituals or rites of organisations have an important role in affecting or consolidating change.
What are the political mechanisms that can be manipulated within organisations? Resources Elites Subsystems Symbolic
Activity areas Resources Building the power base Control of resources Acquisition of/identification with expertise Acquisition of additional resources
Mechanisms Elites Sponsorship by an elite Association with an elite Subsystems Alliance building Team building Symbolic Building on legitimation
Key problems
Overcoming resistance
Breakdown or division of elites Association with change agent Association with respected outsider Removal of resistant elites Need for visible change hero
Time required for building Perceived quality of ideals Perceived as threat by existing elites Striking from too low a power base Potentially destructive: need for rapid rebuilding
Achieving compliance
Giving resources
Partial implementation and participation Implantation of disciples Support for young Turks
The track record of success in bringing about strategic change within organisations is poor. Many simply fail to grasp that it is implementation (that is, actually turning plans into reality) rather than formulation that is the hard par