Managing Medical Error in the New Medical Home

A review of two residency processes aimed at reducing medical error: A variation on the Morbidity and Mortality Conference Unusual Occurrence Reporting in the Family Medicine Residency Clinic Jessica Burness MD and Elizabeth Klein MD Providence Milwaukie Family Medicine Residency Milwaukie Oregon

Introduction of Participants
Who are you? Where are you from? What do you hope to learn? Destiny by William Bryan: Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice. It is not a thing to be waited for- it is a thing to be achieved. So it is with Managing Medical Error in 2008

Objectives for participants

Discuss the importance of having a system to report and investigate medical error Understand the development and use of our medical error system Be able to develop you own process and form for reporting and investigating medical error Be able to implement physician friendly Morbidity and Mortality Rounds

Medical Mistakes Happen

At least 44,000 and as many as 98,000 people die in hospitals each year as a result of medical errors that could have been prevented, according to estimates from two major studies.
Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.

Medical Mistakes Happen

100-200k people die each year due to medical error in the USA -2X MVA Errors happen 1 in 4 patient visits Increased medical complexity and uncertainty leads to increased errors Residents Errors differ from Practicing Physician Errors

Error Definition
IOM Failure of a planned action to be completed as intended or the use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim AAFP Past President Dr Bruce Bagley A medical error is anything that happens in my office that shouldnt have happened and I absolutely do not want to happen again

Resident vs Practicing MD
35-50 % of Resident Errors due to misdiagnosis or delay in care Practicing Physician Errors are more likely related to process errors, results lost, not acted on, lost specimen, lost or incomplete records

Errors in Family Practice

According to AAFP Policy analyst Susan Dovey, MPH- examined error in office 24% Communication problems 20% Discontinuity of care 19% Lab results- timing, fu 13% Missing values, charting errors

Errors in Family Practice cont

8% Clinical Mistakes (knowledge/skill) 8% Prescribing Errors (dosage, choice, allergy or interaction) 8% other Medical errors in family practice are a result of multiple conditions rather then just prescribing error or bad doctors

Truths about Medical Errors

Errors will happen Since errors happen, systems must be designed to prevent and absorb them Errors are not the same as negligence, therefore need to look at systems not just individuals Must have culture of safety for error reporting

Intense feelings common when medical errors occur

Anxiety, humiliation, fears of being sued or professionally censured Resident evaluation and promotion also a concern However, recent reports show declines in malpractice claims and costs occur when disclosure and apology are implemented.

3 Main Reasons for Lawsuits

1) Matter of justice and fairness 2) Financial compensation for harms and setbacks 3) Out of need for explanation, accountability and concern for care standards and needs not being met

Need Systematic Program for Medical Error Evaluation

Medical error must be disclosed and discussed in a systematic fashion in order for effective change to occur to reduce medical error.
Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.

??? Remains- How do you implement a systematic program for error evaluation and disclosure in the family medicine office??

Future of Family Medicine

New Medical Home is Patient Centered with Integrated Care where Quality is measured and improved and Safety becomes systematic instead of just assumed Quite a challenge..

New model and our office

New Model includes Goal of Systematic Safety in the new Medical Home I wanted to create a culture of safety in our Family Medicine Center and Residency I wanted to look at systems, not individuals View adverse events as OPPORTUNITIES to make our office safer and better for our patients and our staff

Culture of Safety
Empower everyone to point out errors Look for weak links Look for root causes Review and update polices and procedures Avoid punishing those who commit errors, within reason

PLANNING
Innovative Director- Dr Bill Gillanders Our faculty are adventuresome and idealistic Our program is young and willing to pilot new projects- Ex EHR, Electronic Billing, Electronic Orders, Depression Screening in the waiting room etc. We value and ask for input from staff, residents and faculty

Unusual Occurrence Reporting Planning for office use

Hospital UORs have been used for years The hospital form needed revision to be useful in the office Discussions regarding who would fill them out, who would review them and who would follow through on the changes that we wanted to implement

Implementation of UOR process

Bumpy start Lack of consistent follow through Loss of Office Manager Loss of UORs by Medical Director Revised form several times Culture of safety prevailed

Implementation of UOR process continued

UORs reviewed and discussed at all provider and staff meetings- On the agenda at both meetings Encourage staff, residents and faculty to fill out the UOR form Faculty, new office manager and staff like our process

Examples of UORs
Narcotic prescribing, lack of contracts, need for compliance by docs, especially faculty Visual acuity on every patient with eye complaint Steroid injection depigmentation- Didactic and better PARQ Form for steroid injections Missed ischemia on EKG- New form and process for EKG reporting and faculty sign off IUD Perforation- Didactic on IUD PARQ and insertion-new IUD consent form

Examples of UORs continued

Direct hospital admission policies Immunization Errors Medication Errors Test Notification Errors- delay, wrong pt Falls- Children and adults- Fall Prevention TM Perforation with Ear Lavage- better training of Medical Assistants

Lessons Learned
Innovative director and enthusiastic clinic manager really helps Emphasis on improving systems to protect patients and staff is important Promotes good role modeling by faculty Empowers staff because they see results Promotes Culture of Safety

Share your experience

Medical Error Reporting in your clinic or residency Unusual Occurrence Reporting What were your challenges and successes? What were some unexpected outcomes?

Morbidity and Mortality Conference: A Revised Model

Jessica Burness MD

Outline
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Background and Rationale Core Concepts for Revised Model Pilot Our Experience Future Directions

Background and Rationale

Learning to appropriately and effectively address error is an important part of resident education. The Morbidity and Mortality conference is a tool for addressing medical error.

Background and Rationale

The emotional consequences of committing medical errors are not slight.
Douglas, S., Crook, E., Stellini, M. et al. Medical Errors and the Trainee: Ethical Concerns. American Journal of Medical Sciences. 2004; 327: 33-37.

There is evidence that exposure of error in Morbidity and Mortality conferences can cause stress, anxiety and blaming which may lead to future non-disclosure of medical errors.
Wu, A., Folkman, S., McPhee, s., et al. Do House Officers Learn from their Mistakes? JAMA. 1991: 265: 2089-2094.

Background and Rationale

Undue stress and anxiety is not conducive to education. In order to address medical error and be educationally valuable, a Morbidity and Mortality conference must be structured such that it creates a supportive, safe, and non-persecutory environment.

Background and Rationale

There is no consensus or single standard on the appropriate structure of a Morbidity and Mortality conference within a department of Family Medicine or Internal Medicine.
Orlander, J., Fincke, G. Morbidity and Mortality Conference; A Survey of Academic Medicine Departments. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2003; 18: 656-658.

Background and Rationale

There are suggestions in the medical literature for frameworks for Morbidity and Mortality conferences that might foster a supportive, safe, and non-persecutory environment.
Orlander, J., Barber, T., Fincke, G. The Morbidity and Mortality Conference: The Delicate Nature of Learning from Error. Academic Medicine. 2002; 77: 1001-1006.

Background and Rationale

There is no literature to suggest that any Morbidity and Mortality conference format is effective at simultaneously systematically addressing medical error and being perceived as educational, supportive, safe, and non-persecutory.

Core Concepts
All adverse patient outcomes should be identified on a continuous basis. Cases should be generated from the entire practice population. Error and adverse events should be classified and defined according to a basic taxonomy of error. Moderator(s) should ensure the conference environment is supportive and non-persecutory, and that it does not stray from the format.

Core Concepts
Faculty and residents should both participate in generation of cases and discussion of cases. If systems problems or generic mistakes are identified, discussion should be facilitated on how to prevent future similar adverse events. An action plan should be identified and subsequent practice changes should be communicated and implemented.

Pilot Study Model

2 Moderators, faculty member and chief resident Conference begins with brief standard intro about confidentiality, universality of human error, and learning from mistakes.

Pilot Study Model

Brief numerical review of all adverse outcomes for the month and taxonomy of error. Chief resident. Two to three 10 minute case presentations of adverse outcomes or near-misses with clarifying questions only.

Pilot Study Model

Moderators lead discussion after full presentations. Discussion centers on error type, factors leading or contributing to adverse outcome, and/or barriers to good outcome. All discussions end with brainstorming and choosing action ideas to reduce similar future errors or adverse outcomes. Final portion of conference to review actions taken (and results?) from previous conferences.

Goals
Can a Morbidity and Mortality conference be structured such that it simultaneously systematically evaluates medical error and is perceived by residents as being educational, supportive, safe and non-persecutory? Surveys before and after pilot study implementation to attempt to answer the question for this Morbidity and Mortality conference design.

Limitation
The only computerized database currently available to cull data on adverse outcomes is the inpatient database. Ideally, we would have similar ability to access data for outpatient care.

% Respondents answering STRONGLY agree

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 7 Before After

% Respondents answering STRONLY disagree

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 6 East West

Modifications for Providence Milwaukie residency

Half-hour time slot limits us to 1 case Cases presented every 2 months instead of monthly 1 moderator Follow-up process Managing Medical Error Committee for M&M cases and UOR cases

Sample Case
From selection, through presentation and discussion, to follow-up

Call for M and M Cases

Cases (inpatient or outpatient, from our practice) should involve:
1. a poor or unintended outcome which might have been due to or worsened by error or system problems, or 2. near-misses, where there was an error or misstep in care delivery that could have led to a poor patient outcome

The goals of the conference are 1. to learn from each other in a supportive environment and 2. to improve patient care in our practice.

Future Directions
Incorporating ideas from Matrix Process at Cedars Sinai Patient Healthcare Matrix Creation of system to query outpatient data for markers Greater number of cases, rely on databases, not solely volunteers Your ideas?????