Contract Law in Cyber Space

Neeraj Aarora
Advocate
FICWA, LLB, MBA (IT), CFE (USA)

Empanelled Legal Expert with CCA, DoIT, Govt. of India

What is E-Contract?
An

E-Contract is the computerized facilitation or automation of a contract in a cross-organizational business progression.

It is a most recent mechanism to govern electronic trading

relationships between business parties and is modeled, specified, executed, enacted, controlled, monitored and deployed (fully or partially) by a software system.
In an e-contract, all the activities are carried out by

electronic means. Thus one of the advantages of an econtract is that it overcomes the delays involved in the manual system and personal biases.
6/4/2013 Neeraj Aarora 2

Validity of E-Contract
UNCITRAL Model Law, Article 11 specifically sets about the

formation and validity of E-Contract.

Article 11 states that in the context of the contract formation

unless otherwise agreed by the parties, on offer and the acceptance of an offer may be expressed by means of data message. Where data message is used in the formation of a contract that contact shall not be denied validity or enforceability on the sole ground that a data message was used for that purpose
Simultaneously, Article 12 states that as between the originator

and the addressee of a data message, a declaration of will or other statement shall not be denied legal effect, validity or enforceability solely on the ground that it is in form of a data message.

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

Formation of an E-Contract
The law has already recognized contract formation using

facsimile, telex and other similar technology. An agreement between the parties is legally valid if it satisfies the requirements of the law regarding its formation. This is evidenced by their compliance to the requirements of the contract law.
In India, it is section 10 of the Indian contract act, 1872

which deals with the requirement of law regarding its formation

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

Ways in which an online contract can be concluded (A)

1. By exchange of e-mail

The parties can conclude a valid contract by making offers and acceptances entirely through e-mails or by combinations of e-mail with paper documents, faxes, oral discussions etc 2. By acceptance of orders entered on e-commerce websites This type of contract is concluded where a website operator offers goods or services for sale, which the customer orders by completing and transmitting an order form displayed on screen.

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

Ways in which .
Click-wrap agreements In click wrap agreements, a party after going through the terms and conditions provided in the website or programme has to normally indicate his assent to the same, by way of clicking on an I agree icon or decline the same by clicking I disagree. This type of acceptance is usually done before receiving the merchandise. 4. Shrink-wrap agreement Shrink-wrap agreements have derived their name from the shrink-wrap packing that usually contains CD Rom of softwares. The term and conditions of accessing the particular software are printed on the shrink-wrap cover of the CD and the vendee after going through the same tears the cover to access the CD Rom. Thus, the user always has the option of returning the software if the new terms are not to his liking for a full refund.
3.
6/4/2013 Neeraj Aarora 6

Ways in which .
5.

6.

Electronic data interchange (EDI) It is the inter-process of communication of business information in a standardized electronic form. That is to say, they are contracts used in trade transactions which enable the transfer of data from one computer to another in such a way that each transaction in the trading cycle can be processed with virtually no paperwork. Through electronic agents According to Rusell and Noving, an agent is anything that can be viewed as perceiving its environment through sensors and acting upon that environment through effectors. A human agent has eyes, ears and other organs for sensors and hands, legs, mouth and other body parts for effectors. According to Jennings, an electronic agent as, a hardware or software-based computer system that enjoys the following properties: autonomy capacity to interact with agents or humans, the capacity to perceive their external environment and to respond to changes that are coming from it and the capacity to exhibit goal-directed behavior by taking the initiative
Neeraj Aarora 7

6/4/2013

Section 10 of the Indian contract act, 1872

It says that All agreements are contract if they are made

by the free consent of parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object and are not hereby expressly declared to be void.
The parties entering into a contract must have an intention

to create a legal relationship. But if there is no intention to create a legal relationship that agreement cannot be treated as a valid contract.

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

Requirements of a Valid Contract

There should be an offer.

It must be accepted by the offeree.

The agreement must be made by the free consent of the parties.

The parties to it must be competent.

Consideration should be lawful.

Consideration should be with a lawful object.

The agreement should not be expressly declared to be void
6/4/2013 Neeraj Aarora 9

FORMATION OF AN AGREEMENT

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

10

A. Offer or Proposal
1. In order to have an agreement, there must first be an offer.

2. The offer can be an offer for a good or a service or

almost anything else for that matter.

3. The general principal that THE OFFEROR IS MASTER

OF HIS/HER OFFER i.e. the person making the offer can frame the contours of the offer and in particular can specify the method of acceptance by the offeree.
4. The invitation to offer is a particular action or statement

which is intended to provoke an offer from another party.

6/4/2013 Neeraj Aarora 11

Online Offer or Proposals

Vendors doing business via. the internet generally:-

a) Provides the detail of goods and services with the prices .

b) Provides the detail of goods and services with the prices and also include some procedure by which the customer may accept the offer for example, I agree or I accept the terms of this offer etc.

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

12

B. Acceptance
1. The next step in agreement formation is called an

acceptance.
2. Acceptance results in the formation of a contract, both

parties are bound and neither can withdraw from the bargain without incurring liability to the other.
3. Acceptance must be expressed or communicated by the

offeree to the offeror, in order to manifest mutual assent.

4. The

general principal that SILENCE CANNOT CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF AN OFFER.

Neeraj Aarora 13

6/4/2013

Online Acceptance
Everyday people express their assent to some terms. In case of surfing the internet, it is generally done by clicking on some icon like I agree and in cases of installing any software, assent is generally made known by the conduct of tearing the CD package and using it. These

actions may appear to be very casual and informal but are of immense
legal importance because they lead to a valid and enforceable contract and those terms that people hardly even bother to read can be strictly enforced against them

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

14

C. Consideration
1. The third aspect of agreement formation is called

consideration. 2. Consideration means that something of value must be exchanged. 3. It is anything of value promised to another when making a contract. It can take the form of money, physical objects, services, promised action, abstinence from a future action and much more. 4. Consideration in a contract must be mutual that is both parties must receive something of value but the value need not be equal or necessarily fair.

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

15

Postal rule vs. instantaneous communication rule

Postal rule Contract through post/correspondence is complete when the acceptor puts his acceptance/assent into transmission so as to be out of the power of the said acceptor and the contract is made at the place where acceptance is made. Instantaneous communication rule Contract through telephone/telex/fax is complete when the acceptance is received by the offeror and the contract is made at the place where the acceptance is received.

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

16

Entores Ltd. vs. Miles Far Eastern Corporation

1. The plaintiffs in London made an offer by telex to the

agents of the defendant corporation in Holland. 2. This was accepted by a telex which was received on the plaintiffs telex machine in London. 3. But the contract was made in England. For that purpose the plaintiffs to serve a writ on the defendant corporation outside of the jurisdiction. 4. The court held that the contract was made in London:
When a contract is made by post it is clear law throughout the common-law countries that the acceptance is complete as soon as the letter is put into the post box and that is the place where the contract is made. But there is no clear rule about contracts made by telephone or by telex. Communication by these means is virtually instantaneous and stands on a different footing.
6/4/2013 Neeraj Aarora 17

 The plaintiffs commenced an action in the City Civil Court at

Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia vs. Girdharilal Parshottamdas and Co

Ahmedabad against the Kedia Ginning Factory & Oil Mills of Khamgaon (defendants) for a decree of Rs. 31,150 on a plea that the defendant had failed to supply cotton seed cake, which they had agreed to supply under an oral contract dated July 22, 1959 negotiated between the parties by conversation on long distance telephone. The plaintiffs submitted that the cause of action for the suit arose at Ahmedabad because the defendants had offered to sell cotton seed cake which offer was accepted by the plaintiffs at Ahmedabad. Therefore, the decision by majority view was that: Telephone is an instantaneous mode of communication just as if the parties were in presence of each other. The exception to the general rule, as applied to post would not apply here. So in this case, the contract would be made at the place where acceptance is received i.e. Ahmedabad.

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

18

The Information Technology Act, 2000 Imp. Provisions

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

19

Definition (section 2 of the IT Act)

1. Originator

The IT Act in sec 2 (1) (za) defines originator as a, person who sends, generates, stores or transmits any electronic message or causes any electronic message to be sent, generated, stored or transmitted to any other person but does not include an intermediary. The importance of this definition which excludes an intermediary is that it delineates the person who is attributable for a message from the system that sends the message. Thus, the law will focus on the person responsible for the message and not on the physical location of electronic equipment.
6/4/2013 Neeraj Aarora 20

2. Addressee

The definition of addressee found in section 2 (1) (b) of the IT Act, is inspired from the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce. It means a person who is intended by the originator to receive the electronic record but does not include any intermediary because it is acting as mere conduit, in the delivery of the message..

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

21

3. Intermediary

The definition of intermediary under section 2 (w)

inserted by the IT Act, with respect to any particular

electronic records means any person who on behalf of another person receives, stores or transmits that record or provides any service with respect to that record and includes telecom service providers, network service providers, internet service providers, web-hosting service providers, search engines, online payment sites, onlineauction sites, online-market places and cyber cafes.
6/4/2013 Neeraj Aarora 22

Validity of contracts formed through electronic meansSection 10A ITA

Section 10A applies when the contract formation such as the communication of the proposals, the acceptance of proposals, the revocation of proposals and acceptances is carried on electronically. The provision states that such a contract will not be termed invalid merely because, these steps of contract formation were carried on-line. Hence, a need was felt that the steps of such contract formation when carried online should be given legal recognition.

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

23

Trimex International vs. Vedanta Aluminum

SATHASIVAM J. after analyzing a voluminous record of email between the parties held that the parties had concluded a contract through such minute to minute correspondence. This precedent also flows from the

settled contractual principles that the intentions of the

parties or the consensus-ad-idem are the material considerations with the form of the agreement, being only

secondary in contract formation and determination

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

24

Attribution of electronic record- Sec. 11 ITA

The aforesaid section lays down conditions as and when an

electronic record shall be attributed to the originator [section 2 (1) (za)

A. If it was sent by the originator himself.

B. By a person who had the authority to act on behalf of the originator in respect of that electro.nic record
C. By an information system programmed by or on behalf of the originator to operate automatically.

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

25

Acknowledgment of receipt- Sec. 12 ITA

1) Where

the originator has not stipulated that the acknowledgment of receipt of electronic record be given in a particular form or by a particular method, an acknowledgment may be given by(a) any communication by the addressee, automated or otherwise; or (b) any conduct of the addressee, sufficient to indicate to the originator that the electronic record has been received.

2) Where the originator has stipulated that the electronic

record shall be binding only on receipt of an acknowledgment of such electronic record by him, then unless acknowledgment has been so received, the electronic record shall be deemed to have been never sent by the originator
6/4/2013 Neeraj Aarora 26

Acknowledgment of receipt- Sec. 12 ITA contd.

(3) Where the originator has not stipulated that the electronic record shall be binding only on receipt of such acknowledgment, and The acknowledgment has not been received by the originator within the time specified or agreed or, if no time has been specified or agreed to within a reasonable time, then the originator may give notice to the addressee stating that no acknowledgment has been received by him and specifying a reasonable time by which the acknowledgment must be received by him and If no acknowledgment is received within the aforesaid time limit he may after giving notice to the addressee, treat the electronic record as though it has never been sent.
6/4/2013 Neeraj Aarora 27

Time and place of despatch and receipt of electronic record- Sec. 13 ITA 1. According to section 13(1) the dispatch of an electronic record occurs when it enters a computer resource outside the control of the originator. The process of dispatch involves sending off (electronic transmission) of the electronic record to a destination. 2. The aforesaid sub-section(2) lays down condition for the time of receipt of an electronic record for:
a) a designated computer resource: it states a situation where the addressee has already designated a computer resource for the purpose of receiving electronic records. b) a non-designated computer resource: it states a situation where the addressee has neither designated a computer resource nor any timing for the purpose of receiving electronic records. The receipt occurs when the electronic record enters the computer resource of the addressee
6/4/2013 Neeraj Aarora 28

Sec. 13 ITA contd

3. The aforesaid sub-section (3) sets forth a more objective

criterion namely, the place of business of the parties (both the originator as well as the addressee) an electronic record is deemed to be dispatched from the place where the originator has his place of business and is deemed to be received at the place where the addressee has his place of business.

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

29

Presumption as to Telegraphic messages Sec. 88 IEA

A. Under section 88 there is a presumption only that the

message received by the addressee corresponds with the message delivered for transmission at the office of origin. There is no provision as to the person who delivered that message of transmission. The proof authorship of the message need not be direct and may be circumstantial. B. No presumption can be made as to the person by whom the telegraphic by whom the telegraphic message was sent. In the absence of evidence to show that it was sent by the person by whom it was purported to be sent and he specifically denied having sent it, held that the message was not proved.

6/4/2013

Neeraj Aarora

30

THANK YOU!