Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
University of Phoenix HCS/451 Team B: Qualisia Clayton and Jocelyn Garcia May 29, 2013
Page 1
Objectives
Presentation will include the following:
o Summary of how the scenario might apply to the chosen organization o Information needed and the most appropriate tools for responding to the scenario o Why the process, information, and tools were chosen and how they should contribute to a response o The decision the team made regarding the scenario and how the decision was reached o How any changes resulting from the decisions could be disseminated and implemented in the organization o An explanation of the concept of continuous quality management in the health care industry o Challenges the team faced in this project
Page 2
Introduction
Parkland serves as a level one trauma center along with other hospitals in the area such as Baylor and Methodist hospital. Parkland is funded by Dallas County tax payers, hospital reserve funds and private donations.
(National Center for Biotechnology Information , 2011)
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Information needed and the most appropriate tools for responding to the scenario
Page 7
Page 8
Why the process, information, and tools were chosen and how they should contribute to a response
philosophical and structural elements associated with CQI, including: 1. Epidemiological and clinical studies, coupled with insurance payment and medical records data, often referred to as the basis of evidence-based medicine 2. Involvement of the medical staff governance process, including quality assurance, tissue committees, pharmacy and therapeutics committees, and peer review 14 CHAPTER 1 THE GLOBAL EVOLUTION OF CQI 3. Use of risk-adjusted outcome measures 4. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis 5. Use of quality assurance data and techniques and risk management data
Page 9
Page 10
The decision your team made regarding the scenario and how you reached your decision Identify the issue Solve the issue What strategy to come up with to resolve issue Managing the performance
Page 11
How any changes resulting from your decisions could be disseminated and implemented in the organization
A drastic change in implementing the regulations of the CAP shows a major improvement Page 12
Page 13
An explanation of the concept of continuous quality management in the health care industry
Page 14
Page 16
Conclusion
Quality and risk management are apart of all organizations to solve or improve current or future problem within the organization. Many issues within the organization causes the performance to decrease as well as patient satisfaction. Communication between the risk, quality, and management units will increase patient safety and reduced liability effectively
(Dunne,E., 2007)
Page 18
Questions
Page 19
References
Carroll, R. L. (2009). Risk management handbook for health care organizations (Student ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sollecito, W. A., & Johnson, J. K. (2013). McLaughlin and Kaluzny's Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. Decision Making . (2011). Retrieved on May 25, 2013 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21140861
Sollecito, W. A., & Johnson, J. K. (2013). McLaughlin and Kaluzny's Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. IntegratedQualityMgmtMode. (2010, November). Retrieved May 29, 2013, from yukonhospitals: http://yukonhospitals.ca/Documents/IntegratedQualityMgmtModel_Nov2010.pdf Egerton, B., Moffeit, M., & Dunklin, R. (2013). Chronic Condition. (A. Stewart, M. Beelman, D. Swanson, Editors, D. Lathrop, Producer, & Dallas Morning News) Retrieved May 16, 2013, from Dallas News: http://res.dallasnews.com/graphics/2013_02/parkland/#day5main
Page 20