Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
EVALUATION
The term evaluation is derived from the word valoir which means to be worth. Evaluation is the process of judging the value or worth of an individuals achievements or characteristics. Evaluation is a decision making process that leads to suggestions for actions to improve participants
SELF EVALUATION
Self evaluation is defined as judging the quality of ones work, based on evidence and explicit criteria, for the purpose of doing better work in the future. It is one of the best method of performance appraisal, if it can systematically introduce. Self evaluation is the way in which an individual views himself.
To encourage continuing selfevaluation and reflection and to promote an ongoing, innovative approach. To encourage professional growth in interest to the employee individual areas of
To improve morale and motivation by treating the employee as a professional in charge of his or her own professional growth.
CONTD.
To
encourage collegiality and discussion about practices among peers in an organization support employees as they experiment with approaches that will move them to higher levels of performance
To
confidence in their own learning, in trying out new ideas, in changing their practice and in their power to make a difference. for collaborative working, despite initial anxieties about being observed and receiving feedback team-work and greater flexibility in their use of their skills awareness of new techniques and greater insight into thinking planning skills to effective task management ensure more
Enthusiasm
Improved
Increased
Enhanced
Observation can involve experts, can be informal or formal procedures. Feedback from such observation is very valuable. Audit checklist
PEER EVALUATION
Peer review/Evaluation is a process by which employees of the same rank, profession and setting evaluate one anothers job performance against accepted standards.
O Loughlin and Kaulbach
Direct
observation of course
Videotaping Evaluation
materials
Analysis
of portfolios
Establish a policy requiring peer reviews Establish criteria for peer evaluations Procedure for conducting peer evaluations Faculty chosen to conduct peer evaluations shall be tenured and hold on academic rank higher than that of the faculty member being evaluated written report, addressing the criteria, shall be prepared and signed by the evaluator
o. A
CONTD..
o
The department shall archive the evaluations for use in future evaluations
written
One copy of the peer evaluation shall be placed in the permanent personnel file of the person being evaluated All reports of peer evaluations shall be included in the tenure file, and are to be carefully reviewed at the department
PATIENT SATISFACTION
Patient satisfaction is defined as a health care recipients reaction to salient aspects of the context, process, and result of their service experience. - Pascoe (1983)
Patient
satisfaction is dened as the extent of the resemblance between the expected quality of care and the actual received care. - Scarding (1994)
about patient satisfaction equips nurses with useful information about the structure, process and outcome of nursing care is a requirement for therapeutic treatment and is equivalent to self therapy. Satised patients help themselves get healed faster because they are more willing to comply with treatment and adhere to instructions of health care providers, and thus have a shorter recovery time.
It
Medical Quality
reviews
Indices
performances
Judgemental
of the programs and activities of various departments including outpatient care, inpatient care, overall health education activities of the hospital of the various resources available in the hospital for effective health care of effectiveness of hospital personnel including medical, paramedical, nursing as well as nonmedical employees of the hospital. are relevant to the needs of the population it serves.
Evaluation Evaluation
Services
ULITILISATION REVIEW
The utilisation review program includes determining appropriate hospital length of stay and necessary treatments for various illnesses and conditions and reviewing patient medical records on admission and at intervals during hospitalisation to ensure that the patient receives appropriate care.
main aim is to curb the exploding health care costs with conservative use of hospitalisation and expensive diagnostic and treatment procedures. work in liaison with a business organisation to provide healthcare services to the organisations employees at discounted rates. containment to limit each patients diagnostic and treatment measures to the fewest, least expensive procedures that will relieve patient symptoms, avert costly complications, and return the patient to fullest possible function in the shortest time possible.
They
Cost
utilization review nurse is a RN who reviews individual medical cases to confirm that they are getting the most appropriate care. can work for insurance companies, determining whether or not care should be approved in specific situations, and they can also work in hospitals. of this profession do need to possess compassion, but they also need to be able to review situations dispassionately to make decisions which are fair, even if they may be uncomfortable. a hospital, a utilization review nurse examines patient cases if the hospital feels that a patient may not be receiving the appropriate treatment.
They
Members
At
CONTD.
In an insurance company, the utilization review nurse inspects claims to determine whether or not they should be paid. nurse weighs the patient's situation against the policy held by the patient, the standards of the insurance company, and the costs which may be involved in treatment. work in this field, it is usually necessary to hold a current nursing license, and to have experience in the field.
The
To
NEED FOR EVALUATION According to WHO, Evaluation of Health services, is the systematic process of determining the extent to which an action or sets of actions were successful in the achievement of predetermined objectives. It involves measurement of adequacy, efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of the service being evaluated. It renders possible the reallocation of priorities, changes in the assessment of needs, the planning and implementation of care and the management of resources.
ASPECTS OF EVALUATON
Patient
Outcomes
Purposes of Evaluation
Clarify
Facilitate
participants progress towards the achievement of the goals of the programme. the maintenance of strength and elimination of weakness on the part of participants. the participants. sense of accomplishments (psychological security) for the participants and consumer.
Provide
Develop
CONTD.
more reliable and valid instruments for measurement. the overall value (eg: cost, efficiency) of undertaking for both participants and consumer immediately over long period. and maintain standards to meet legal, professional and academic credentials.
Determine
Establish
TYPES OF EVALUATION
Summative
evaluation: It evaluates the progress towards an established outcomes. The summative evaluations focus on the achievements or lack of achievement of outcomes. A Summative Evaluation, on the other hand, looks at more than one learner's performance to see how well a group did. evaluation: It analyzes the response to a specific intervention. Formative evaluations look at the particular pieces of the action plan and the relative importance to the whole. It is therefore tend to focus on the process of carrying out the action plan.
Formative
Monitoring Development
Synthesizing
Recommending
Evaluation
Support& Constraints
Assess
performance in relation to behaviorally stated work goals. a representative sample of employees total work activities . supervisors evaluation with employees self evaluation. specific examples of satisfactory and unsatisfactory performance
Observe
Compare
Cite
CONTD
Indicate
which job areas have highest priority for improvement. conference should be held in good atmosphere. purpose of evaluation is to improve work performance and job satisfaction.
Evaluation
The
dimension scales(JDS)
Behaviorally
(BARS)
Checklists Essays Self
appraisals. by objectives.
Management Peer
Fayol
defined as verifying whether everything occurs in conformity with the plan adopted, the instructions issued and principles established. It has for its object to point out weakness and error in order to rectify them and prevent recurrence. defines controlling or evaluating as seeing that everything is being carried out in accordance with the plan which has been adopted, the orders which have been given and the principles which have been laid down.
Urwick
Critical
Program
Benchmarking Master
Evidence-Based
Eg: PERT
Eg: Benchmarking