Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
performance.
they relate to the quantity & cost of inputs in manufacturing goods & providing services.
Quantity standards specify how much of an input should be
Standard Cost
A standard cost is a planned or pre-determined cost
which is calculated from managements standard of efficient operation & the relevant necessary expenditure.
Standard Costing
Standard costing is the preparation of standard costs
and applying them to measure the variations from actual costs and analyzing the causes of variations
correcting actual performance to ensure that the plans are properly set and implemented
Establishing budgets.
Controlling costs, directing and motivating employees and measuring efficiencies. Promoting possible cost reduction. Simplifying costing procedures and expediting cost reports. Assigning costs to materials, work in process, and finished goods inventories. Forming the basis for establishing bids and contracts and for setting sales prices
Set the predetermined standards for sales margin and production costs
the variance
Analyze the variances and ascertaining the causes of variance Take corrective action to avoid adverse variance Adjust the budget in order to make the standards more realistic
Valuation
Planning
Controlling
Evaluating performance by determining how efficiently the current operations are being carried out
Ideal Standard Ideal standards are those that can be attained only
under the best circumstances. These can be achieved through the best possible combination of factors i.e. maximum output at minimum cost. Assumption:
Extremely tight & do not provide for waste & inefficient in any forms. No material is wasted. No units are spoiled. No idle time. Operators work at predetermined speed. The available capacity is fully utilized
Practical standards are those standards that are tight but attainable. Assumption:
Practical Standard
Allow for normal machine downtime Employee rest period. Practical standards are used in Using signaling abnormal condition Forecasting cash flows Planning inventory
Setting Standard
setting standards.
Setting price and quantity standards requires the combined
Setting Standard
Standard must be established for a definite period of
time so that they can be effective in performance evaluation, control & analysis of costs.
Standards are developed for
Connotation of Standard
Standard Price Quantity Material Price Quantity Labor Rate Hour Overhead Rate Hour
Object Matrix
AQ=Actual Quantity AP=Actual Price SQ=Standard Quantity SP=Standard Price
Object AP SP
AQ AQ*AP AQ*SP
SQ -SQ*SP
Basic wage rate per hour Employment taxes Fringe benefit Union negotiation
Variance analysis
When the actual results are better than the expected results, there will be a favorable variance (F).
If the actual results are worse than the expected results, there will be an adverse variance (A).
Profit variance
Selling and Total production administrative Cost variance Cost variance Sales Variance
Overhead variance
Mix Variance
Yield Variance
Mix Variance
Yield Variance
Calender variance
Efficiency variance
Capacity Variance
(ASPPU SCPU)
(SSPPU SCPU)
Problem
ZB Company produce a single product. Variable manufacturing overhead is applied to products on the basis of direct-labor-hours. The standard costs for one unit of product are as under:
Standard Quantity Or Hour 3 Pound 2.5 Hours
2.5 Hours
Standard Cost
Tk.12
Direct Materials
Direct Labor
Variable Manufacturing O/H
Tk. 14
Tk. 3
Tk.35
Tk. 7.5 Tk. 54.50
During June, 2011, 2000 units were produced. The costs associated with Junes operations were as under Actual Quantity Or Hour Direct Materials Direct Labor 6500 Pound 5400 Hours 5400 Hours Actual Price or Rate Tk. 3.80 Tk. 13.75 Tk. 2.85 Actual Cost Tk.24700 Tk.74250 Tk.15390
Requirements: 1. Compute & Comment on the material variance if I. All of the material purchased was used during June. II. 5000 units of materials is used during the period of to produce 1600 units of products 2. Compute & Comment on the Labor variance. 3. Compute & Comment on Manufacturing Overhead Variance.
Requirement: 01 (i) Material Price Variance = (AP SP)*AQ = (Tk.3.80 Tk.4)*6500 pounds = Tk.1300 F Data Derived: Standard Quantity (SQ) = SQ Per Unit * Units Produced = 3 Pounds * 2000 Units = 6000 Pounds Material Quantity Variance = (AQ SQ)*SP = (6500 6000)* Tk.4 = Tk.2000 U Since actual quantity is more than standard quantity to produce 2000 units of product, material quantity variance is unfavorable.
Requirement: 01 (ii) In this situation material price variance is not computed. This is because it is calculated when materials are purchased by purchase manager. Here only quantity variance will be calculated. Here AQ = 5000 units SQ = 3 pounds * 1600 units = 4800 pounds Material Quantity Variance = (AQ SQ)*SP = (5000 4800)* Tk.4 = Tk.800 U Since actual quantity is more than standard quantity to produce 1600 units of product, material quantity variance is unfavorable.
Requirement: 02 Labor Rate Variance = (AR SR)*AH = (Tk13.75 Tk.14)*5400 hours = Tk.1350 F Data Derived: Standard Hour (SH) = SH Per Unit * Units Produced = 2.5 hrs * 2000 Units = 5000 Hours Labor Efficiency Variance = (AH SH)*SR = (5400 5000)* Tk.14 = Tk.5600 U Since actual hours is more than standard hours to produce 2000 units of product, so material quantity variance is unfavorable.
Requirement: 03 Variable O/H Variance = (AR SR)*AH = (Tk.2.85 Tk.3)*5400 hours = Tk.810 F Data Derived: Standard Hour (SH) = SH Per Unit * Units Produced = 2.5 hrs * 2000 Units = 5000 Hours Variable O/H Efficiency Variance = (AH SH)*SR = (5400 5000)* Tk.3 = Tk.1200 U Since actual hours is more than standard hours to produce 2000 units of product, so material quantity variance is unfavorable.
More effective use of materials/ wastage arising from the efficient production process
Use of higher/lower grade of workers Unexpected overtime allowance paid Labor strike leading to utilization of unskilled help Change in labor rate within industry
Labor efficiency variance Purchase of different grade or wrong types of materials Breakdown of machinery High/low labour turnover Changes in production method Introduction of new machinery
Poor working condition Assignment wrong type of worker to work Adequacy of supervision Changes in working condition Change in motivation methods Poor supervision Insufficient training of workers
Fixed overheads expenditure It is meaningless to interpret this kind of variance on its own. It may be caused by the change in the price levels of rent, rates and other fixed expenses
Sales margin price variance Change in the pricing strategies of the company Response to the change of pricing policies of its competitors Higher profit margin with growing demand for the product Lower profit margin for simulating sales
MPV
Purchasing Agent/Manager
MQV Plant Superintendent, Departmental Supervisor, Production Manager, Machine Operator LRV LEV OSV OVV HRD, Departmental Supervisor, Plant Superintendent Plant Superintendent, Departmental Supervisor, Production Manager, Machine Operator
The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) was published in 1992 by Robert Kaplan and David Norton.
The term "scorecard" signifies quantified performance measures and "balanced" signifies that the system is
balanced between:
short-term objectives and long-term objectives
The Balanced Scorecard is a management system that maps an organization's strategic objectives into
internal processes,
customers, and learning and growth.
Strategy
Learning & Growth Objectives Measures Targets Initiative
how shareholders view the firm and which financial goals are desired from the shareholder's perspective.
how the firm is viewed by its customers and how well the firm is serving its targeted customers in order to meet the financial objectives.
Internal
question of
how the firm must learn, improve, and innovate in order to meet its objectives.
Within each of the Balanced Scorecard financial, customer, internal process, and learning perspectives, the firm must define the following:
change
management
plan
for
the
value proposition.
Step Three: Objectives In Step Three, the strategic elements developed in Steps One and Two are decomposed into Strategic Objectives, which are the basic building blocks of strategy and define the organization's strategic intent. Objectives are first initiated and categorized on the Strategic Theme level, categorized by Perspective, linked in cause-effect linkages (Strategy Maps) for each Strategic Theme, and then later merged together to produce one set of Strategic Objectives for the entire organization.
The previously constructed theme Strategy Maps are merged into an overall enterprise-wide Strategy Map that shows how the organization creates value for its customers and stakeholders.
Step Seven: Automation In Step Seven, the implementation process begins by applying performance measurement software to get the right performance information to the right people at the right time. Automation adds structure and discipline to implementing the Balanced Scorecard system, helps transform disparate corporate data into information and knowledge, and helps communicate performance information. In short, automation helps people make better decisions because it offers quick access to actual performance data.
Step Eight: Cascade In Step Eight, the enterprise-level scorecard is cascaded down into business and support unit scorecards, meaning the organizational level scorecard (the first Tier) is translated into business unit or support unit scorecards (the second Tier) and then later to team and individual scorecards (the third Tier). Cascading translates high-level strategy into lower-level objectives, measures, and operational details. Cascading is the key to organization alignment around strategy. Team and individual scorecards link day-to-day work with department goals and corporate vision.
strategy. Performance measures are developed for all objectives at all organization levels.
As the scorecard management system is cascaded down
through
the
organization,
objectives
become
more
operational and tactical, as do the performance measures. Accountability follows the objectives and measures, as
Scorecard relies on a well-defined strategy and an understanding of the linkages between strategic
unlikely to be successful.
performance, but also leading measures that can be used to plan for future performance.
Use of generic metrics: It usually is not sufficient simply to adopt the metrics used by other successful firms. Each firm should put forth the effort to identify the measures that are appropriate for its own strategy and competitive position.