Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
+ Issues for Future Business + Strategies to Increase Competitiveness + New Ways to Enhance Business
4.8%
Hydro Installed capacity worldwide reached 1000 GW by 2010 end (Current annual growth rate of 2.5% owing to huge base)
30%
18.7% 9.3%
10.7% 11.5%
India & China expected to take the lead in hydro generation GoI launched 50,000 MW initiative in 2003
+ Water from the reservoir flows due to gravity to drive the turbine.
+ Turbine is connected to a generator. + Power generated is transmitted over power lines.
Reservoir
Pumped Storage
Francis
Kaplan
Turbine selection done based on operating head & discharge required Other turbine types like Bulb turbines, tubular turbines & reversible Francis also used
1 3
Given the increased focus on renewables & impact on climate, imperative to expeditiously develop hydro power & increase its share in nations generation (contributes only 16% generation of nations generation)
3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Annual Plan
6th Plan 7th Plan Annual Plan 8th Plan 9th Plan 10th Plan 11th Plan
1979-80
1980-85 1985-90 1990-92 1992-97 1997-02 2002-07 2007-12
25859
40950 62043 67969 84783 104188 132330 187294
11269
14457 18125 18808 21422 26186 34654 38990
44
35 29 28 25 25 26 21
2
3 4
Thermal - Gas
Hydro Nuclear
63,400
12,000 18,000
Potential for increase exists problems of clear ances, R&R etc. to be sorted
Safety issue, slow progress of Nuclear utting the same under question parks p
TOTAL
93,400
As per Working Group on Power report, Feasible hydro capacity addition of 12,000 MW and nuclear capacity addition of 18,000 MW has been considered as must run during 13th Plan
With thermal fuel constraints & nuclear safety concerns, hydro remains only feasible avenue for increase in capacity addition
Issues of projects for benefit of 12th & 13th Plan to be resolved before addressing concerns for balance projects
4152 9430
14511 66065
2740 6149
9532 34920
TOTAL
148701
84044
Only 16% of identified potential developed. Market potential of 71 GW still exists (excluding Pump Storage)
BHEL
ANDRITZ
(Rangit 120 MW, Kashang 195 MW, Pare 110 MW)
INDIANINDIAN SUPERCRITICAL
ALSTOM
(Teesta VI 500 MW, Jorethang Loop 96 MW, Bhasmey 55 MW, Tidong I 100 MW, Phatabayang 76 MW, Tehri 1000 MW, Ratle 850 MW)
VOITH SIEMENS
2009-10
330 MW (35%) 120 MW (12%) 500 MW (53%)
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
171 MW (17%)
TOTAL
501 MW
(12%) 425 MW (10%)
ANDRITZ
305 MW (33%) 523 MW (56%) 99 MW (11%) 1096 MW (85%) 196 MW (15%) 850 MW (83%)
ALSTOM
VOITH SIEMENS
TOTAL
950 MW
927 MW
1292 MW
1021 MW
4190 MW
Foreign suppliers set up manufacturing base in India (Andritz Hydro, Voith & Alstom) INCREASED COMPETITION Preference for foreign manufacturers shown by private developers (BHEL share only 26% in 11th Plan orders placed by IPPs)- ordering on firm basis
STATUS
4 x 150 MW Ranjit Sagar: Cannot be used any more as machine commissioned more than 10 yrs ago 3x135 MW Ranganadi, 8x125 MW Indira Sagar: Can be used for qualification of projects upto 165 MW capacity
Qualification an issue for 4x194 MW Luhri, 7x307 MW Etalin as per present QR issued
Qualification for 4x205 MW Ratle managed after relaxation by developer Need to commission projects like Koldam, Parbati III & Kameng at the earliest
BHEL can qualify to quote upto 212.5 MW only on base of 6x170 MW Tala project commissioned in Feb, 2007 For qualification in projects upto 250 MW capacity, Parbati II to be commissioned at the earliest
BUSINESS DRIVERS
CHOICES SHAPING BUSINESS FOR TODAY AND THE FUTURE
2 3
R&R Issues
DESCRIPTION
Govt. identified hydro scheme of 50,000 MW in may 2003. PFRs of all 162 have been prepared. Lower interest rates for financing offered to developers Set up to fast track large investment projects Many hydro projects cleared in meeting held in May Changing basis of EIA studies from basin wise to sub-basin wise in order to enhance potential Standard specs for Hydro projects developed by CEA Transmission system planning by Power Grid to be done in accordance with status of DPRs of hydro projects esp. in North East India CEA appointed central advisory body to cater to all issues pertaining to development of hydro projects from concept to commissioning 5,000 MW of hydro power from Bhutan by 2020 signedmarket potential further augmented
Incentives to Developers
Cabinet Committee on Investment Basin wise EIA studies Standardization of Specs Transmission Systems CEA central advisory body for Hydro Agreement with Bhutan
Project
Price Openi ng / Bid Su bmission D ate Nov, 2011 Sept, 2011 Jan, 2012 April, 2012 Aug, 2012
Results
Reasons for delay in ordering Forest Clearance, Land acquisition, Financial Closure Environment clearance awaited Financial Closure PIB Clearance Project on hold
1 2 3 4 5
L1- BHEL L2- Alstom Bid not opened Bid not opened
Technical evaluati on in progress
Patel Gongri
CVPPPL Pakaldul CHPLLP Gulu
2x72 MW (EPC)
4x250 MW (EPC) 2x 12 MW (E&M)
Scope / Rating
2 x 60 MW (E&M)
Results
3 x 31 MW (EPC)
April, 2012
R&R Issues
Logistical Roadblocks
Mukerian
2x9 MW
June, 2004
108 months
Koldam
4x200 MW
July, 2004
48 months
107 months
3 4 5
Kameng TLDP
3x150 MW 4 x 40 MW
Qualifying Requirements
STRATEGIES TO BE ADOPTED
MOVES ENABLING US TO WIN THE GAME
3 1
Optimisation of Design
Qualification Criteria
1 6
Quality Control
3
Increasing Runner Profile database
Advance action being taken for developing new runner profiles
5. Take special measures to reduce cost of input material by developing alternative vendors (including Chinese vendors).
6. Make or buy analysis for cost reduction.
3 4